Loading...
1992-038City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 92-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS, APPROVING A POLICY POSITION ON VEHICLE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM; ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Dallas -Fort Worth ozone non -attainment area consists of Collin, Denton, Dallas and Tarrant Counties; and WHEREAS, Collin and Denton Counties must implement at least a basic" auto inspection and maintenance program by 1994 to meet Clean Air Act requirements; and WHEREAS, the existing "basic" inspection and maintenance program in Dallas and Tarrant Counties has a high rate of non - participation from car owners and needs better enforcement to be effective; and WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments supports cooperative, cost-effective approaches to air quality programs and has adopted a resolution approving a policy position on vehicle inspection and maintenance program; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake supports the position taken by the North Central Texas Council of Governments; and, WHEREAS, other options proposed by the Texas Air Control Board have merit but do not include a commitment to enhance the current program for greater effectiveness; and, WHEREAS, the Dallas -Fort Worth ozone non -attainment area is not required at this time to implement the other more stringent options recommended by the Texas Air Control Board. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLARE, THAT: Section 1. The City of Southlake adopts the Consensus Position (see attachment 1) developed by the Air Quality Advisory Committee of the North Central Texas Council of Governments. Section 2. This resolution shall be in effect immediately upon its adoption. Passed and approved this 1st day of September, 1992. ATTEST: City Secretary 92-38.RES/0RD&RES/B Mayor Attachment 1 North Central Texas Council of Governments Air Quality Advisory Committee CONSENSUS POSITION AUTO INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM DALLAS/FORT WORTH METROPLEX June 10, 1992 o This region supports a cooperative, cost-effective approach to reach air quality goals. o The selection of an I/M program should be undertaken in conjunction with other control strategies, as part of a comprehensive State Implementaion Plan development process. Cost effectiveness of VM program should be developed. o Under the Clean Air Act, moderate non -attainment areas, such as the 4 -county Dallas -Fort Worth area, are not required to implement centralized "high-tech" programs at this time. o Test operators now using the 2 -speed test "Bar 90" technology in Dallas and Tarrant Counties need an opportunity to recoup their investment over the next 3-4 years. o Decentralized programs can significantly improve emissions reductions if enforcement compliance reaches 90 percent. o Current timetable is proposed by TACE, based upon TACB & Department of Public Safety preference for centralized system in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. o TACB should consider funding and developing a more effective enforcement program to support the current decentralized network, instead of switching now in favor of new technology. Nearly $20 million a year is returned to the general fund from test fees in our area, only a small portion of which is now allocated in return to enforcement of the test program. o TACB should await published guidance from EPA and evaluate the effectiveness of other centralized high-tech" systems before recommending such programs in Dallas/Fort Worth. In addition, MOBILE 5.0 software is forthcoming, with effectiveness to be quantified with its use. o Existing options reduce the incentives for a nine -county integrated program. o The effectiveness of the "high-tech" test has not been demonstrated (i.e. would more vehicles fail this particular test?) o Some options would require up to four trips: safety check, initial emissions inspection, repair if needed, and completed inspection. This would result in great inconvenience to car owners. o The TACB options propose confusing systems based on model years and various locations. A confusing system would hurt the credibility of the program. 0 There is no clear guidance from State at this time whether the Dallas -Fort Worth area needs to focus on NOx testing and control strategy. This issue may be clarified in the next 12-18 months. o There is no demonstrated effectiveness for the pressure test. If the test is indeed necessary, options other than testing as part of a centralized emissions test could be considered, for example, by asking car manufacturers and dealers to conduct the pressure test. o National data from EPA indicate that 10 percent of vehicles produce nearly 50 percent of mobile source emissions. A cost effective program should target these gross polluters. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Texas Legislature should provide sufficient resources & powers to the Texas Air Control Board to fund aggressive enforcement of the decentralized program through the Department of Public Safety and local air pollution control programs. 2. The Dallas/Fort Worth region should pursue the option of Collin and Denton Counties implementing a decentralized inspection and maintenance program. 3. The perimeter counties of the Dallas -Forth metropolitan region (i.e., Parker, Rockwall, Johnson, Ellis, Kaufman) should be asked to consider opting for some form of a basic I/M program. 4. TACB should consider implementation of a decentralized computer system, with real-time enforcement capability, to reduce/remove the discrepancy with centralized networks. If the TACB needs additional funding to implement the computer system, then the TACB should seek funding from the Legislature.