Loading...
1987-037RESOLUTION 87-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMEND- ING THE FORT WORTH WATER CONTRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake approved a contract agree- ment with the City of Fort Worth for the purchase of a surface water supply on March 31,1987; and, WHEREAS, in a letter to City -Administrator, Lloyd 0. Latta Jr, dated April 7,1987, they wish to have that agreement amended; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: The Fort Worth Water Contract be amended, substituting Section 17, as stated in the attached letter from Fort Worth Water Department to Mr. Lloyd 0. Latta Jr., dated April 7,1987. PASSED AND APPROVED this ti4e 21't do pf Apri1;,JJ87 Jclinn E' Westerholm Meyor City of Southlake, Texa AT ,ST : zz/k, Sandra L. Fe -Grand City Secretary, City of Southlake, Texas RT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT 1 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION 817) 870-8220 APR 131987 OFFICE' Cff CITY SECRE'& April 7, 1987 Mr. Lloyd Latta, City Administrator City of Southlake 667 North Carrol Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Lloyd: Recently, we were informed by Eddie Cheatham that Southlake's City Council had agreed to accept the draft water contract submitted to you earlier this year. We are prepared to submit the contract to our City Council for approval, but in order to do so we need to revise slightly the wording of section 17, System Development Charge. As you know, Fort Worth has been actively engaged in the negotiation of new sewer contracts with our wholesale customers. Part of this "give-and-take" has resulted in a uniform System Access Fees section that satisfies the requirements of both Fort Worth and the wholesale customers regarding access fees charged for new and enlarged connections. I would like to substitute for section 17 the following wording for the new Southlake contract: 17 System Access Fees In the event the City of Fort Worth adopts an ordinance which will provide for advance capital contributions for new or enlarged water connections within the jurisdictional limits of Fort Worth, Southlake agrees to pay to Fort Worth on a quarterly basis a charge for each new or enlarged connection for water service made within Southlake's jurisdiction served by the Fort Worth system. The charge to Southlake for such connection shall be based upon the size and type of connection and shall be equal to the charge imposed for the same size and/or type of connection made within the jurisdiction of Fort Worth. The charge for each size and/or type of new connection shall be equal to those as contained in the Fort Worth ordinance adopting water system access fees. Fort Worth agrees that all monies remitted to it pursuant to this section will be placed in a separate account to be used exclusively for general benefit capital improvements, and will not be used for operation and maintenance expenses. CI Mr. Lloyd Latta April 7, 1987 Continued Page 2 Southlake shall provide to Fort Worth such information that relates to the making of new and/or enlarged connections within its jurisdiction as may be requested by the Director, including but not limited to building permits, with each quarterly payment required in this section. Fort Worth will cause to be deposited into the proper revenue account the appropriate charge as provided for in water access fees ordinances for each new or enlarged connection for water service made within Fort Worth's jurisdiction. In reviewing this revised language on system access fees, you might recall that the Fort Worth City Council adopted a wastewater system access fee ordinance on March 31, 1987, that is scheduled to go into effect on May 1, 1987. The full amount of the wastewater fees will be phased -in as follows: Fiscal Year beginning Oct. 1 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Percent of fees to be charged 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Water fees have now been postponed indefinitely, but it is likely that future proposals will include a similar phase-in pattern. Thus, Southlake would not be faced with the collection of water access fees unless and until the Fort Worth City Council elects to implement such fees. Please advise me as to Southlake's approval of the revised wording for system access fees. Upon resolution of this revised language we are prepared to recommend the contract for Fort Worth City Council approval. Your cooperation in this long process has been much appreciated. S' ere y, Ric and W. Sawey Water Director RWS:bd cc: Mr. Eddie Cheatham, Eddie Cheatham do Associates, Inc., 1601 Lamar Blvd. East, Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Gary Steinberger, Assistant City Attorney