Loading...
Item 7CIx THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND OTHER MATERIALS DELIVERED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH ARE PROPRIETARY TO FILLMORE HOSPITALITY, LLC. THESE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN CONFIDENCE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RECIPIENT WILL NOT DISCLOSE, COPY, DISSEMINATE, DISTRIBUTE OR USE THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN OTHER THAN FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE. IF THAT IS NOT THE CASE. YOU SHOULD PROMPTLY RETURN THIS DOCUMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS TO FILLMORE HOSPITALITY, LLC. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS DOCUMENT IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY FILLMORE HOSPITALITY, LLC IMMEDIATELY FOR RETURN INSTRUCTIONS. Document Effective Date: May 19, 2015. General Disclosure. The information in this document is furnished on a confidential basis exclusively for your use and retention and, by accepting this document, you agree not to transmit, reproduce or make available to any other person (other than your legal, tax, accounting and other advisers) all or any part of this document without the express written permission of Fillmore Hospitality, LLC ("FH"). This document is protected by copyright of FH and other laws, all rights reserved. Forward Looking Statements and Projected Property and Management Results. This document contains forward -looking statements based on FH's experience and expectations about the markets in which it invests and assets it manages and the methods by which FH expects to invest and manage in those markets. Those statements are sometimes indicated by words such as "expects," "believes," "seeks," "may," "intends," "attempts," "will" and similar expressions. Such forward -looking statements, including FH's analysis and projections regarding property and management operating and investment results are not guaranties of future performance and are subject to many risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual operating performance and returns could differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied in any forward -looking statements as a result of various factors. FH undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward -looking statement for any reason. FH's expected results and projections are provided for information regarding the FH's investment and management analysis, not as any guarantee or expectation of operating performance and investment results for the Fund's investment portfolio. x .d r= . x. f r 1 v m i 4 Stories 175 Guestrooms 1' 113,822 Square Feet : CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 3 i CAMBRIA Washington, DC�� Nrl _ TlPiil ! ,y Choiceful, relevant pre -arrival communication Amazing first impression Technologically smart Choice Privileges front and center Integrated, mixed use space Interesting seating choices and options Technologically smart ^r - ��� CAMBRIA Washington, DC 1 I 3 Invites you to hang out Convenient options A few things done well Sense of spaciousness Thoughtful efficiency Stylish, yet warm and comfortable Feels like an upgrade as - awe a, CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only CAMBRIA I White Plains, NY mom m aw of Current Rendering A Prior Rendering Cambria offers Upscale, modern, inviting design; Options for guests to personalize their stay, Unexpected service delighters; and a Loyalty program with opportunities to earn more immediate rewards. CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only : i ! i 6i 5 Current Rendering OF 6. Y Prior Rendering s sf b e rer CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 6 Exterior Planning Issues City of . Plan Concerns oo "Amen► • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows • Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with metal spandrel Rear Parking Green Space • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed Guest Room Windows • Concern that windows were "split' with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFIS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco • Both pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFTS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals R -} i4 w } ♦ LJ ■ R i 4 ? w ■ w &vet •- i R 4 rw ww w��■ ra vs wee i ♦ t •i• R t •� sea 4 ■ now ■ Additional 2,000 square feet. e` ♦F 4� OEM -, If �l son arrive s i e a ,■�� Jim ■ :+ ■ ■ # ■ r r �tj ■MI r r ■OF ♦�1 11!M �rl ♦vet 10. w�• wow �� Integration of food & beverage space, expanding the service area to outside. Enhanced amenities. Addition of required safety fencing •. s■ w• ■�! ■ ■!! # illlyR CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only it s aim wow for 2dw .. ADDED FIREPLACE NCOD POOL MOOD ■A7 ■ Nino 'anoon t IF POOL CABANA UPGRADED s BUILT IN SEATING'PLANTER STYLE Ai LIVING WALL UPGRADED CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 9 Exterior Planning Issues Pool/Amenity Area m _ti • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with metal spandrel Rear Parking Green Space • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed Guest Room Windows • Concern that windows were "split" with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFTS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Both pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf ._ • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals Exterior Planning Issues City of • - Plan Concerns Pool/Amenity Area < • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows • Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with metal spandrel Rear Parking Green Space • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed Guest Room Windows • Concern that windows were "split" with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFIS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Comments Both pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker to sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — riorYiefaspandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals Exterior Planning Issues Pool/Amenity Area • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band cern that metal band was removed from Original plan ffffWi,e/ on Windows • Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with rn-=} =' SDandrel Rear Parking Green Space • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed Guest Room Windows • Concern that windows were "split' with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFIS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco ------------- Comments • Both pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass - • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals Exterior Planning Issues Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFTS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Comments R-M vPP- oth pool and patio have actually increased in size R • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements 6ith opaque gla Green space was move _d sir' o lding, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runo • We have moved the furniture off the wall and remov77 mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals Exterior Planning Issues City of • - Plan Concerns Pool/A' • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFTS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Both pool and patio have actually increased in size Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass - A • Green space was o-- e t]ing, bUf can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullio • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals /lu0 saiued papuaaul god - IV11N301:JNOJ bw mw � CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 16 Exterior Planning Issues Pool/Amenity Area • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows • Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with metal spandrel Rear Parking Green Space • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed Guest Room Windows • Concern that windows were "split' with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFIS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco • Both pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel cr, ,. eaner, S er look to those sections ` c MAY, span `lfe glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff m-- A • We have moved the furniture off the wall and remove �" mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 18 Exterior Planning Issues Pool/Amenity Area • Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original — Metal Barr • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows • p Concern that window area on everyfloor was replaced with metals spandrel ._ . Rear Parking Green'c�" • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot h 5en removed guest Room m be Concern that windows were "split" with too many mullions 7t Canopy Angle Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed y Tower Angle Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFIS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Comments Both pool and patio have actually increased in size' • Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250sf _.. 'he metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass tcl - - iF = tions • Actually, drel — so it will look the same but hide the necessary structural element s jjW ith opaque glas"'V�IV '>' oWWrViW`il` iiV`Y ` w6reen space was" 'bu l return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and rem mullio • Change was done to create more visually appealing a structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals [MISTING [MAUP= GF EKTFCCfi V°[RTICAL LCUSRRS IN"GI[L LISU"IMII 6lLllMVM "kVllUVHGSf4N OR GLANS, imam ACrL^L rAAI[L US[b TO a Ci2AX ANF30UM ALUFANIIM M UAL FO tAWH FRAMES a STOMFAO07.1KkO%41 o(AIGRAM OF MERiKAL TEt mgikt AI[ CONOTT11WING UNR ASS➢NNLT. ARCMT[CTURIIL LOUM TO fE pokao ow THE tomot WE OF UNIT. TH4T ADIMNS THROUGH AN OUR WALL (LEFT$ E7tTERioR VTAiC LouvERS :i7UTMA4S1 VIEW QF C"MIMA WOT14 AKT, TX11giPIM: HOW 1 M M IUKATMNSAAF INCCIFF04RTT0 INTO? CRIIiI[NT DfmN (fLLaw, SIMOR EKAM►I,E OF HOW VER7�CAL LCSIVEK A[E Tp [E FM[FCOF0 MTQ TNF WPdX)W RAMIN t/ UNTI Ali 9 r. v4s" P4 WESTIN Dallas, TX I st 44 t a DOUBLETREE I Lovefield. TX E=�� DOUBLETREE sr wr�roN CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 21 Exterior Planning Issues pol/Amenity Area IWONW, Ir = Concern that pool and amenity area was reduced from original submittal Metal Band • Concern that metal band was removed from Original plan Spandrel on Windows Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with metal spandrel Rear Parking Green Space dk • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been Saft-Vmoved `nest Room Windows K:. • Concern that windows were "split' with too many mullions 11WFront Canopy Angle • Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle • Concern that Entry Tower angle had been changed Louvers for VTAC • Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EFTS vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFIS rather than approved Stucco Comments Moth pool and patio have actually increased in size • Original pool design was 452sf - new design is 469sf • Original patio area was 6,250sf - new design is 8,250sf • The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to create a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections • Actually, spandrel glass was used - not metal spandrel - so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements with opaque glass • Green space was moved closer to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion • Change was done to create more visually appealing and structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design - Plano version is old design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look • Term EFIS was an error on plans - it will be a 3-coat system per the original approvals Exterior Planning Issues Pool/Amenity Area Concern that pool and amenity area was • p y reduced from original submittal Metal Ban" • ncern that rl]@tal_ha S. r�rCl„from„�rinipalenlap el on WinINKNOWINT-0 ON WWII- . Concern that window area on every floor was replaced with -ricwr ■-mnrrou yr cam## • Concern that a green space in rear parking lot had been removed nest Room Win • Concern that windows were "split" with too many mullions Front Canopy Angle Concern that front canopy angle/design had changed Entry Tower Angle ncern that Entry Tower anale had been chan uvers for VTAC Concern that louvers were not on original concept drawing EF/S vs Stucco • Concern that plans show EFTS rather than approved Stucco Both pool and patio have actually increased in size"11111. Original pool design was 452sf — new design is 469sf Original patio area was 6,250sf — new design is 8,250 The metal band was removed and replaced with spandrel glass to reate a cleaner, sleeker look to those sections Actuall`; pandrel glass was used — not metal spandrel — so it will look the same, but hide the necessary structural elements opaquNM atass,_ en spa to the building, but we can return it to original approval location if necessary • Moved to improve civil design, landscape and runoff • We have moved the furniture off the wall and removed the mullion= • Change was done to creafe`more visuaTty appearing""and "" _ °' "` " structurally sound design • This was done to update design to Cambria 2.0 prototype (old Cambria 1.4 prototype had angled design — Plano version is AftIiild design) • It was always intended to do upgraded VTAC units rather than PTAC units, and this was discussed during original presentation • We have designed the louver as part of window configuration to minimize visual impact and create clean look: • Term EFIS was an error on plans — it will be a 3-coat�sysi . per the original approvals Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total St - Square Footage of Conference Center chaff Meeting Space Total SF • Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,100sfto 5,079sf • Breakout Rooms shifted from 1,440sf to 1,372sf Kitchen SF • Concern that Kitchen SF decreased from 1,200sf to 920sf Boardroom SF • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Extra Breakout Room SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story • Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf to 8,738sf IV,y. • Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout • Added additional restrooms • Original Ordinance document was incorrect — totaled 5,076sf, not 5,100sf • Still working on the final Kitchen SF • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200sf • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from 288sf to 507sf to accommodate 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room UPGRADED GLASS WALLS r r i r A Ia ! ■ ■ +. +. UPGRADED ■��■ BUILT IN SERVE 4:' STATIONS I -A if i4 ♦ .-s ��� taw tr♦ "+� ♦ r# ♦�# 4 i ri • � a. 4, M 40 4 1 46 a 0, s M 6 t ♦0 t*w ■ 'Ir t•t 4w BREAKOUT SPACE e.g.. memo * ■MIF 0 11 ■al. I ■ ■r AD Ea• +� a qNr ■ i CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 25 Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total SF • Square Footage of Conference Center changed Meeting Space Total SF • Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,100sf to 5,079sf • Breakout Rooms shifted from 1,440sf to 1,372sf Kitchen SF • Concern that Kitchen SF decreased from 1,200sf to 920sf Boardroom SF • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Extra Breakout Room SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story omments • Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf to 8,738sf • Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout • Added additional restrooms • Original Ordinance document was, incorrect — totaled 5,076sf, not 5,100sf • Still working on the final Kitchen SF • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200sf • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from 288sf to 507sf to accommodate 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total SF Boardroom SF • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Extra Breakout Room SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story Comment Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf t 8,738sf • Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout • Added additional restrooms • Ori inat Ordinance,,document was, incorrect - totaled 5 Q76sf not, 5,100sf • Still working 'oni'"e� iria KitcFio'� • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200sf • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from 288sf to 507sf to accommodate 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total S • Square Footage of a er nce-Center c an ed Meeting Space Total Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,100sf to 5,079sf • Concern that Kitchen SF decreased from 1,200sf to 920 Boardroom • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Extra Breakout Room SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story Comments • Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf to 8,738sf • Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout - • Added additional restrooms . •g Original Ordinance document was incorrect totaled 5,076sf, notM5,100sf fi Kitc • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200sf • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from 288sf to 507sf to accommodate 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room r f0 IIIr • r I WE � 4,F-� V010, - UPGRADED GLASS WALLS FOCAL POINT OF CONFERNECE CENTER UPGRADED BUILT IN SERVE STATIONS LIGHTING CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 29 Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total SF • Square Footage of Conf�>vk alia— C. Ned Meeting Space Total SF • Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,1 00sf to 5,079sf Concern that Kitchen SF decreased from 1,200sf vararvvm or • Square Footage Boardroom changed • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story -------_--------- Comments • Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf t' 8,738sf • Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout • Added additional restrooms rininnl C)rHinanra rinri imant %nrac inrnrrart — tntnlari Fi n7Fsf not • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200s = • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from" 14 people instead of original 10 "'%Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room Interior Plannina Issues Conference Center Total SF • Square Footage of C'nnfQrPnr_.a_C 9W, changed Meeting Space Total S • Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,100sf to 5,079sf • Concern that Kitchen SF MEMsed from 1,200sf to 920 Boardrooms _ • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Ex-1r-6 area Vouf oom SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ceiling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story Comments Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf t 8,738sf Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and . - - improve overall layout Added additional restrooms • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200s • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from s e s ` c� mo a e. , 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area — moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room 1 l A . `k ■ on& go& e3t,av Prior Floor Plan at ohs r CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 32 a Interior Plannin Issues Conference Center Total SF • Square Footage of Conference Center changed Meeting Space Total SF • Concern that Meeting Room SF decreased from 5,100sfto 5,079sf • Breakout Rooms shifted from 440sf to_1x372sf n Kitchen SF - ,.- • Concern that Kitchen SF decreased from 1,200sf to 920sf Wardroom SF • Square Footage of Boardroom changed Extra Breakout Room SF • Concern that Extra Breakout Room SF changed Fitness Center SF • Concern that Fitness Center SF changed from 1,995sf to 1,061 sf Tower Interior Ce►'ling Height • Concern that interior Tower ceiling height was changed from 2-stories to 1-story Commehts AM *Overall Conference Center square footage INCREASED from 8,380sf to 8,738sf Most of this space was shifted to increase Boardroom space, and improve overall layout Added additional restrooms Original, Ordinancedocumentwas incorrect- totaled. 5a076sf, not 5.100sf o ng�on el m ' Kitc • Will likely add satellite pantry/prep area to Conference space which will increase Kitchen SF to almost 1,200sf • Boardroom SF was INCREASED from 288sf to " o77ccommodate 14 people instead of original 10 • Boardroom will be focal point of Conference Center • Square Footage changed from 468sf to 456sf • Original Fitness Center layout blocked access to Outdoor Amenity area - moved to allow connection between Indoor and Outdoor space • Space was shifted to create Pub/Bar area and larger dining space • Created much more Resort -style amenity with better flow between Bar/Pub/Fire Pit/Pool area • The 2-story ceiling was part of the old Cambria prototype design, which was found to feel cold and cavernous, resulting in very few guests utilizing the area • Interior 1 st floor ceiling heights are still 12 feet • The proportion and scale of the space is better at 1 story • This allows us to add a Luxury Suite in the Tower space with glass walls throughout the room Prior Rendeng CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only 3 Current Rendering .J 4 _.. rt -_ jp t REMNEW 2 _R 4 -- CONFIDENTIAL - For Intended Parties Only rij 35