The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7BCITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT May 12, 2015 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Development Plan for Shady Lane EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Hat Creek Development is requesting 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Shady Lane to develop seventeen residential lots and three open space lots on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Ln., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "SF- 1A" Single Family Residential District. Requested Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood # 4. REQUEST DETAILS: ACTION NEEDED: ATTACHMENTS: The applicant is requesting 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Shady Lane to develop seventeen residential lots and three open space lots on approximately 20.5 acres. The Development Plan has been revised since the case was first tabled at 1 st reading on March 3, 2015 to remove one residential lot. With the reduction of one lot, the net density has decreased from approximately 0.965 dwelling units per acre to approximately 0.912 dwelling units per acres and the gross density has decreased from approximately 0.88 dwelling units per acre to approximately 0.83 dwelling units per acre. A comparison of the site data between the originally proposed eighteen lots and the revised plan with seventeen lots is below. Residential Average Lot Gross Net Density Open Space Open Space Lots Size Density 18 33,648 sq. ft. 0.88 0.965 4.74 ac. 23.12% DU/Acre Units/Acre 17 34,032 sq. ft. 0.83 0.912 5.37 ac. 26.20% DU/Acre Units/Acre The existing home on the proposed Lot 6, Block A will remain with the exception of the areas shown in gray, which will be removed. The approximately 1,500 square foot accessory building on Lot 6, Block A is also proposed to remain. Consider 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map Case No. ZA14-144 (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30, 2015 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-690 (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA14-144 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Hat Creek Development OWNERS: Brian Nerney, Clifton Wayne Johnson, Patricia Johnson, Clifton Wayne Johnson, Jr., William Brett Johnson, City of Grapevine PROPERTY LOCATION: 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Ln. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956, 1966 and 1988 and given the "AG" Agricultural District zoning designation. - The "SF-1A" Single Family Residential zoning designation was placed on the property with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 in September of 1989. - The existing home at 909 Shady Ln. was constructed in 1973 (Source: City Building Permit). - The existing home at 853 Shady Ln. was constructed in 1979 (Source: City Building Permit). SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The site is designated "Low Density Residential", which specifies single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential development is consistent with this designation. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Shady Ln. to be a local residential street with 50' of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows a >8' Multi -Use Trail extending from Shady Lane through the Corps of Engineers property to the Grapevine city limit. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing 12' driveway for the home at 853 Shady Lane into a pedestrian trail with 5' sidewalk connections to Shady Lane, the proposed cul-de-sac, and the Corps property. Four (4) foot sidewalks are required along all local residential streets. The Developemnt Plan shows a 4' sidewalk along Shady Lane and along the streets internal to the development. IIMill k6�1•1:i1filIEel k ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development proposes two streets with access onto Shady Lane, which is a local residential street. Traffic Counts are not included for local residential Case No. Attachment A ZA14-144 Pagel streets in the City of Southlake Traffic Count Report. Traffic Impact * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition WATER & SEWER: The property will be served by an existing 8" water line and a 6" sewer line in Shady Ln. TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Plan shows that there is 72.31 % existing tree cover on the site, so Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D requires a minimum of 40% of the existing canopy to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve approximately 66.00% of the existing tree cover. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on January 13, 2015. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: January 22, 2015; Tabled (7-0) to the February 5, 2015 meeting. February 5. 2015; A motion to approve the item, subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30, 2015 and the staff report dated January 30, 2015, noting for the record that the applicant has agreed to articulate on all lots, but especially on Lots 8-15, thirty (30) foot and thirty-five (35) foot setbacks prior to going to Council with the application and will address a percentage of how that will come to fruition, that the applicant will build a sidewalk on the northwest portion of the project on Shady Lane, noting that the applicant has agreed to clean up the creek on the south side of the project, also noting the applicant's willingness to present to Council a second rendering of Lots 8-15, which would have a consistent southern boundary as opposed to the meandering drive as is shown now so that that can be more fully addressed by Council, received a (3-3) vote. A subsequent motion to deny the item also received a (3-3) vote. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: March 3, 2015; tabled (7-0) at 1st reading to the April 7, 2015 meeting. April 7, 2015; placed on the agenda as a Work Session item on April 7th and tabled on consent (6-0) at 1st reading to the April 21, 2015 meeting. April 21, 2015; tabled on consent (6-0) at 1st reading to the May 19, 2015 meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30, Case No. Attachment A ZA14-144 Page 2 2015. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-144 Page 3 Vicinity Map Shady Lane o o ;N 2149 it o pevine ........ SHADY.LN._.._.. 2814 1112 1106 1104 1100 212 200 204 L�10 16 28 201 05 209 13 N 890 2212 2200 2204 2208 c 28 N 2216 2201 2205 2209 2213 0 v o 2y1O o _ W o 'a e(v J o m 2208 2266 2zoa 0 m w ° EE�R ti°° Z5 2212 2420 2440 2460 2480 00 2 Nm o ^ N �rn i9 m o 2419 2423 245 2469 24 N� o Gp N `rS o co 224a 22,3, n m N ti��o 223 N '° m � � N N 2420 2460 2480 2500 2510 2530 2 r8p 2200 2 � 2205 N .1 W E ZA14-144 114 d S -� Zoning Change and Development Plan 114 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA14-144 Page 1 R-PUD REGULATIONS Residential Planned Unit Development District - Land Use and Development Regulations & Open Space Management Plan for the 20.5 acre development known as Shady Lane Property Southlake, Texas Zoning Case # ZA14-144 12 MAY 2015 This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the "SF-20A" Single -Family Residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than twenty two thousand (22,000) square feet. Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty (30) feet. Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet. Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of thirty (30) feet. Lot Width: The minimum lot width shall be one -hundred ten (110) feet, except for Lot 1, Block A, which shall be 100', minimum. Lot widths shall be measured at the Front Yard setback line for each lot as indicated on the Zoning Development Plan. Lot Depth: The minimum lot depth shall be one hundred forty five (145) feet. Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty-five percent (45%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. The existing accessory buildings on Lot 7, Block A shall be allowed to remain. Minimum House Size: All houses shall be a minimum of 3,500 s.f. in floor area. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 1 A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along the internal street frontage of all Residential Lots. Sidewalks and trails within the Open Space Lots shall be as shown on the Zoning Development Plan and Pedestrian Access Plan. Streets: A 31' B-B pavement section with standard 5" curb & 40' R.O.W. with 5' S/W & U.E. on both sides shall be provided along the frontage of all residential lots. The cul-de-sac shall be 90' B-B diameter paving, in a one hundred (109') foot diameter ROAN. Buffer lots: No buffer lots shall be required. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 2 Open Space Management Plan: Intended Usage: The common open space areas of the project are intended for the quiet enjoyment of the residents within the development. Open Space Lots 1 & 2, as primarily visual amenities, shall be kept in their natural state; with the intent of maximizing preservation of the extensive existing tree cover. Occasional trimming of the grounds and drainage -ways may be necessary from time to time, to keep a quality appearance. Open Space Lot 3, the central open space area, with also have preserved trees, but the area between those trees will be fully landscaped, irrigated and maintained on a regular basis, and shall serve as a visual amenity and interior "park -like" atmosphere for the use of the residents. All sidewalks and trails are intended for recreational pedestrian traffic, shall be kept in good condition, and accessible to the public. Any significant changes to the plan must be approved by the City Council. All Common Open Space shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA), to be established for the development. All other areas shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners, including the front yards and required streetscape trees of the residential lots. All property owners shall be required to be a member of the HOA. Dues assessments, required for the maintenance of the common areas and other HOA activities, shall be mandatory. The HOA, through a resident Board of Directors, shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the protected open space within the development, either directly or through a third -party management company. No full-time employees are contemplated to be necessary. The expenses required to maintain the common areas at a quality level shall be estimated annually by the HOA Board, and dues shall be determined and assessed on each property owner in an equitable fashion at such a rate as necessary to maintain such a level of quality. The annual expenses for such open space maintenance are initially estimated to be $30,900, or approximately $1,828 per homeowner. Authority to enforce these requirements, and to place a lien on the property if such dues are not paid, shall be in the form of written Deed Restrictions and Covenants, agreed to by all property owners at purchase, and shall run with the land. Provisions shall be made, in the HOA bylaws and Deed Restrictions, that in the unlikely event the HOA fails to maintain all or a portion of the protected open space in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for it's maintenance and take corrective action, including the provision of extended maintenance. The costs of such maintenance may be charged to the HOA or individual property owners that make up the HOA, and may include administrative costs and penalties which shall become a lien on all property in the development. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 3 Proposed Wall/ Iron Fence Photographs: Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 34, PRTCT 25 I 23 j 24 Blac�l. _ _I'.lon II Volumr3a\�0i. e'1I, PR I _ 15 1a I 27 26 �. G,.. 12 - •• S '40'2 / E 14 .40' w,..i rh,•. Sroc<I&� �♦ I I I I \� I I I�__J •F--' I I _�� I I rl �, r•.; .. v..1�.u,.n //1,1 i.. M A—Z; l:naL d.� �g�Y9 -. 0.'ac. I1 I L'7}J1 29,0%J.__. Y_-- I\ —2 1 12,mi ac 1 __— I 1 I -; -� j '-�.osl wr. 1 _I �•4.J 1 i3.0Y1 ..e ts;_ I... I 6 1 IYl;124.E 2l,IN a.( / 1.4 1.1 /t 71 \ i II s•uxves«;xN Sammy k Belinda %,V l Mmstrang, I-1. No.- 1 D205267836, RPRTCT ID::i /C\ .udY Moyer. �' \\ // )16,(I7s f.l� .`• I Lysw 1 1 r 26.T6 f�G 1 i ♦ — Brr Marianne Mclister, volume 0734, Po9s 2184, DRTCT I 1 ' 26.116 S.,4y, Ab,?go. 1688 City ofTErdpevine_ G' /---------—ur Soulhlake - / aaouxs � Ir �1`Y4�. k'rceman SuT•tr},jk6tract / n.u..k ♦ w r rya%n 1 f \ 1 \ + E.lkg J - / 41- YT dW' r r S 57'38'60' W � owaar:alia. rr ------------IY6Ss9.r. ih-- iI Y I /¢' / ♦ Y/ 1 I '' United Pevin Slea Mnerlco Jody 11 Wright 0 4lolak Pro ert .._j21r D Y� _.r-a lstewau I F icy. � ; 30.798JY jy 1 � Erc smith, Instrument ao,n7d 9.t \� \�`/ % 'et�aa` o No. D203379501, / 81 RPRTCT `\� '�,-� c n �•��+""'^I+ —ie 5 • \ �� / 2/ _ i / rr Opc A c2& r, .a lk,n9ru `� • `\f 2/ , Prdarci3. l:am. la- . I � . � Y.41 x. x. " M n.5 I I 5 City of S—thlake, , 5 2013059-. I� volume 13083, Poge 608, DRTCT 9>, ,230.72' 1nsJ _ S\BT4O'S9 Legend W Concrete Sidewalk ------ 5' Minimum Concrete Trail — — — Flood Plain ------ Estimated Location of ------ Flowage Easement R.O.W. Dedication (shmytam) Common Open Space EAKI Residential Lots 7 —7 Notes: -Front Setbacks are 30' Typical -Rear Setbacks are 30' Typical -Side Setbacks are 15' Typical -There will be no outside storage onsite -Open space lots will be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA). -Trails will be field located to save trees -Open space areas are open to the public but are to be maintained by the H.O.A. Site Data Summary Chart Existing Existing Proposed Number Average Gross Net Density- Open Open Zoning Land use Zoning of Lots Lot Size Acreage Acreage DU/ Gross Space Space (s.f.) Acre Acreage Area/ % SF1A 7eaty R Identlal RPUD 17 34,023 20.50 18.65 0.83 5.37 26.20% Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 5 TREE CONSERVATION PLAN DA ctioEiAEIII 25 [G,.PI L. [GroPe„ine Loke ProOerly] � . 18 3R C 27 26 Bloc PARKA UNDAr , 2. tR I%-\10iP.Jll, PRT36, 1o DT 1329 112 �i\./�/ Wool Survbk Abe�No. 1bbb , E 49 fordpevine_ -f ty-of Southloke o3os4E III y 2 `♦ t 1 37J13eW; 1 22y73ff. �. -� 2201s.E 220',f. +� \ l / /, Sammy h Belinao 1, - _� ,pmap el // L 6 \\ Armslrona. Insl. No. �,�- \'\ "yh `j. D205267836, RPRTC- /<� Ir_.t z Judy I Moyer, (\ \ Hi Marianne MWlisler, Valume, Pagc 21849 DRTCT 1 �, Judy A. Wr'.LuMght Y a I / �� I Un'ted SloleePmer'co PruVe�fy] Eric Smith, �1-Ir-1 No. D203379501, RPRTCT 4 i M.G/ / /1 • OFeoS�<2& 'i Ira _ram / 3.41 Pe/aell3 I Grn. ie � 1 I, I Cily of Southlake. I / 5 29.1f1 59"- r/,� ♦� volume 13083, ooge 'I 1 _ T14 "' / DRTCT S SrMY59 fi08, � W 230..7? ! 1 Fa` 'I Tree Canopy Coverage Total site area 892,823 s.f. Total existing canopy z645,577 s.f. --> 72.31% Preserved tree canopy Preserved tree canopy (green)=426,097 s.f. --> 66.00% Possible preserved tree canopy (yellow) = 84,332 s.f. —> 13.07% Removed tree canopy (red)=135,148 s.f. --> 20.93% z645,577 s.f. --> 100.00% L 8nd Preserved Tree Canopy MW Possible Preserved Tree Canopy Removed Tree Canopy MW Case No. Attachment C ZA14-144 Page 6 USOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: ZA14-144 Project Name: Shady Lane — Residential Development SPIN Neighborhood: #4 Meeting Date: January 13, 2015 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twenty-eight (28) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Kosse Maykus, Maykus Custom Homes City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I City Staff Contact: Richard Schell, Principal Planner, 817-748-8602 Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://%Ymy.cityofsouthiake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand: forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: • Eighteen (18) residential lots and three (3) open space lots. • Proposed Residential Planned Unit Development zoning (current zoning SF-1A). • Approximately 20.5 acres. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-144 Page 1 Shady Lane Development Plan n -J Development & Pedestrian Access Plan Shady Lane QUESTIONS I CONCERNS: • What is the plan for the existing house? 0 Remodel and leave on site —some of it will be removed- family will move in. • What about the 572 easement line? Won't that affect lots 7-15? 0 The easement does prohibit construction of the primary structure, however, we can put pools, cabanas, etc. in that location. • The lots are only 100 feet wide or close to 100 feet. I am concerned about the homes being stacked too close to each other. • This is a PUD? o Yes • Are the lots adjacent to the existing drive being measured using the square footage of that area? Won't it be fenced off for public use? But you're including that property in the square footage for the lots... • I am concerned about Lots 1-5 and drainage. o We have done a lot of study regarding the drainage in this area. We plan to use the existing pipe and bury it to connect with the Corps. property and remove the ponds. We cannot exceed pre-existing conditions. • The north driveway faces my house and I am concerned about head lights... 0 1 can offer to build a natural screen barrier to work with you. • I am worried about the safety of that driveway so close to the curve in the road, accidents occur there often. o The traffic counts will be so minimal-, we feel most residents will use the southern drive. • The northwest triangular piece... is Grapevine selling that to you? o Yes, I'm buying it. • A debate occurred regarding the definition and intent of low density and 9 dwelling unit per acre. • I want to see one house on one acre. • Would you be willing to flag the proposed entrances so people can get a visual of where they will be located? 0 Yes • Discussion continued regarding net density. The applicant stated he is responding to the market, talked about creative use of the property and blending into the neighborhood — this is a green development. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-144 Page 2 • I am concerned about increased traffic. Up to 36 cars will come in and out of the development. o This is the least amount of traffic in a development that is low density residential. • Will you be building sidewalk (along Shady Lane)? o No — it is currently a bar ditch area. • What is the minimum square footage of the homes? o 4,000 minimum I most will average 5,000+ • What will you do with the trail behind the green belt? o The existing 10' concrete trail will remain. We will extend it with a 6' trail to connect to the Corps. property. • I would like to see broader setbacks between the homes; 40 foot total (20/20). o We are doing what is required; 20 foot total (10110). • I would like to see the existing trail something other than concrete. o Concrete is a cleaner material and easier to maintain. • A resident complimented the SPIN process and thanked everyone for attending. He invited the neighbors to take a look at what was done in Estes Park. The proposed development will look similar to the custom home side in Estes Park. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-144 Page 3 Case No.: ZA14-144 REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Three Project Name: Development Plan — Shady Lane APPLICANT: Kosse Maykus Hat Creek Development P.O. Box 92747 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 329-3111 E-mail: kosse@maykus.com Date of Review: 01/30/15 PLANNER: Curtis Young Sage Group, Inc. 1130 N. Carroll Ave. Ste. 200 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 424-2626 E-mail: cyoung@sage-dfw.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/29/15 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. A preliminary plat that conforms to the underlying zoning change and development plan must be processed and approved but City Council and a final plat that conforms to the underlying zoning change and development plan must be processed and filed with the County prior to issuance of any building permits. Show, label and dimension the width of the Shady Ln. right of way (50' local street) and traveled roadway on or adjacent to the site. Dimension the right of way dedication 25' from the centerline. Make sure that the Shady Ln. centerline shown matches the centerline shown on the Evergreen Estates plat. 3. The required minimum radius for the paved surface of a cul-de-sac is 50'. The Fire Marshal has approved the 45' radius turnaround with the stipulation that fire sprinkler systems must be installed in all of the homes in the subdivision. 4. Show the limits of the 100-year flood plain and the 100-year floodway (if any) on the Development Plan. Show the 100-Year flood plain in a Drainage Easement with bearings and dimensions. 5. The property will be served by an existing 8" water line and a 6" sewer line in Shady Ln. Show the correct sizes of existing water and sewer lines that are in Shady Lane on the utility plan. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The required Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted with the proposed Development Plan. The proposed zoning is Residential Planned Unit Development (R-PUD), and The City Council shall consider the application for the Tree Conservation Analysis in conjunction with the corresponding Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 1 development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Analysis if the Council finds that the Analysis provides for the following: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. 2. Since the development is proposed to be an R-PUD and approval of the Tree Conservation Analysis is considered by the City Council, it does not have to comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. As submitted the Tree Conservation Analysis does comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The site has 72.31 % of existing tree cover and 40% of that tree cover would be required to be preserved. The submitted Plan shows that 66% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved and 20% is designated as "Marginal". Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson(a_ci.south lake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Sidewalks shall be required to be constructed with each dwelling. 3. Civil construction plans shall include plan sheets for pre -construction, post -construction and permanent erosion control measures and stabilization. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 2 Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. Ul%lIEll :Z01Ly,l►yilEll k111&1 3. Minimum size for water lines is 8". 4. Waterline shall be looped or extended to property line. 5. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2" blow -off per the City's details. 6. Single family residential developments require fire hydrant spacing of 400' maximum for non -sprinkled residences or 600' for sprinkled residences. Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 7. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards. 8. Proposed sanitary sewer shall be located in parkway - not under pavement, except for crossings. 9. Clearly label all public and private sanitary sewer lines. Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 3 Clearly label all private and public storm lines. 3. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 4. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. 5. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30" RCP and under - 15' easement 42" — 54" RCP - 20' easement 60" — 66" RCP - 25' easement 72" — 102" RCP - 30' easement Over 102" RCP — 3.5 times diameter 6. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site/concept/development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. 1k1;101N MUIEel k/_1 W6191M IMIMIkIII &I * Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre - construction, construction and post -construction erosion control measures. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 4 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements(cD-ci.southlake.tx.us CrlEll kIEllZU Wd91Ly,I►yilEll k111&1 Proposed street names need to be approved by the City of Southlake prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and alternate names as soon as possible. Ia1:74We1kl;Kde]►y,ILy,lEll k111&1 Fire apparatus access, the public street, needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (minimum of 80,000 Ibs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) Cul-de-Sacs must have a 30 foot inside turn radius, and 50 foot radius (100 foot diameter) for an approved turnaround for emergency vehicles. The Fire Marshal has approved the 45' radius turnaround with the stipulation that fire sprinkler systems must be installed in all of the homes in the subdivision. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un-sprinkled homes. (Hydrants do not meet distance requirements on plans) Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. (Hydrants not provided at entrances off of Shady Lane into the two new streets) Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao(aD_ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 19 dwelling units= $57,000.00 will be required. Fees will be collected with the approved developer's agreement. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 5 Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right -Of -Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. 5ft pathway required along Shady Lane and both sides of all interior streets. General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting for this project was held January 13, 2015. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The existing fence on Shady Ln. appears to be in the right of way dedication area. If the fence is to remain, approval a right of way encroachment agreement will be required. The flowage easement note will also be required on the plat. The required minimum radius for the paved surface of a cul-de-sac is 50'. However, the Fire Marshal has approved the 45' radius turnaround with the stipulation that fire sprinkler systems must be installed in all of the homes in the subdivision. No review of proposed signs is intended with this development plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected development plan and other required plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA14-144 Page 6 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Shady Lane 010 2020 2160 009 2145 2149 1112 1108 11 City of Grapevine 2814 Raintree 15 2830 2850 212 g 0 200 204 T 216 2839 59 2869 201 205 209 213 890 221 2800 2820 2200 2204 2208 PATT S Y 2216 2845 2900 2201 2205 2209 2213 W Q 'L510 wT 2848 2850 m �s D LN z9oa ie ry1`t% ^ry0 2849 2851 2900 2208 2200 zzoa 26°0 S L 2212 2440 2460 2480 N 2420 2500 84> 2000 Nm �1p 839 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 9 B 3s 2419 2423 2469 sa 840 1� Z24a 223> s� 830 825 0 23 2 829 001 w 2420 2460 2480 2500 2510 2se 821 GREENBOUG REENB N 2530 SPO 1. Owner Grapevine, City Of ZoningPhysicalAddress SF1-A 1015 SHADY LN • 'Response 0.64 NR 2. Johnson, Patricia Etal SF1-A 1001 SHADY LN 7.98 NR 3. Nerney, Brian SF1-A 853 SHADY LN 8.69 NR 4. USA SF1-A SHADY LN 16.98 NR S. Lehmann, Jean E Etvir Paul A SF20A 1100 SHADY LN 0.67 F 6. Trautman, Barbara Etvir Thomas SF20A 1104 SHADY LN 0.46 O 7. Lotter, Debora & Bruce SF20A 1108 SHADY LN 0.46 O 8. Stewart, Charlie III & Linda S SF20A 1112 SHADY LN 0.48 O 9. Armstrong, Sammy Etux Belinda SF1-A 1012 SHADY LN 1.34 F 10. Norman, Daniel Jr Etux Kimberl SF20A 2212 YEARGAIN CT 0.50 O 11. Jameson, Mark J Etux Nicole (Form from current owners Michael and Amy Monroe) SF20A 2216 YEARGAIN CT 0.72 O 12. Segrest, Eugene Etux Celeste SF20A 2208 YEARGAIN CT 0.47 F 13. Moyer, Judy I SF1-A 1010 SHADY LN 0.79 F 14. McAllister, Marianne SF1-A 1008 SHADY LN 0.74 O 15. Wright, Judy A (Robert S Foree) SF1-A 1004 SHADY LN 0.78 O 16. Johnson, Patricia SF1-A 909 SHADY LN 0.51 NR 17. Smith, Eric SF1-A 906 SHADY LN 0.72 NR 18. Smith, Eric SF1-A 900 SHADY LN 0.90 NR 19. Schreiner, Robert L Etux Ann SF1-A 2444 RAINTREE DR 0.26 NR 20. Gibson, Jed C Etux Michele M SF1-A 2420 RAINTREE DR 0.67 O 21. 1 Archer, Michael Joe Etux Wilma SF1-A 813 SHADY LN 2.29 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 1 22. Azamar, Peter SF1-A 760 SHADY LN 0.34 O 23. Azamar, Peter SF1-A 780 SHADY LN 0.55 O 24. Azamar, Peter SF1-A 770 SHADY LN 0.35 O 25. Azamar, Peter SF1-A 800 SHADY LN 1.45 O 26. Southlake, City Of SF1-A 850 SHADY LN 0.49 NR 27. Southlake, City Of SF1-A 870 SHADY LN 0.83 NR 28. Azamar, Peter SF1-A 810 SHADY LN 0.69 O 29. Novakovic, Roberta SF1-A 2480 RAINTREE DR 2.13 O 30. Johnson, Elizabeth B Etvir C SF1-A 2460 RAINTREE DR 0.97 O 31. Schreiner, Robert Lewis SF1-A 2440 RAINTREE DR 1.09 NR 32. Gibson, Jed C Etux Michele M SF1-A 2420 RAINTREE DR 1.56 O 33. Archer, Michael Joe Etux Wilma SF1-A 813 SHADY LN 1.07 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices sent: Thirty-three (33) Responses received from property owners within 200': Twenty (20) — Attached Responses received from property owners outside 200': Fourteen (14) — Attached plus an additional 123 signed petititions in opposition — link to pdf of signed petitions Responses received from City of Grapevine residents: Seven (7) - Attached Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 2 t4ottficatic)n ROSp07 e Form ZA14-144 22, �D'i5 at s:3(11PM AfMstrang, S;ammy Ftux 1301inda 1012 SYoadTx 76092 DR VIAND DEUYERY �{OViDE COMPLETED F-CIHMS SCMIIA AEC, P O 1 ��f{i . PLEAS 1 P QF THE gEFORE �H� START are hereby Bthe �e ovyner() of the property sa noted above, about favor of (<:,popose-do to (�rtdec`ded (circle or undeiiine onO the proposed Z(ninhar�e and leveiometlt Phan referemed alavue regarding our pegition: space for carnmOln rig 9 a it ett yr- AT ° hw� � oiv _ -- Siqr3atur8' L Addltvnal 6ignature: Data_ ❑ate: f " Printed 1Wame(sj:� .must bw property nwnw(s) whose narne(s a wnknd a' top- Oirernis •contact the Plannin•q ❑gyp pnt. Cne fcxm per pmpertq. Phone number (optional): gl -1 13 -1 L cl Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 3 February 18, 2015 Mayor John Terrell 1400 Main Street Su i to ##270 5cuthlake, Texas 76092 Mr. Mayor Terrell, I am writing to you regarding the pending request for a proposed sub -division being considered on North Shady Ln, I own a home on 1.6 acres directly across from the proposed entry for the new homes. I have had the pleasure of residing here for over a decade. I start each morning walking out with my trusty golden retriever to fetch the morning paper. It's a gorgeous walk that allows me to witness the sun coming up over a pond often filled with ducks, geese, and other beautiful birds. Of course it goes without saying I would love to keep this little paradise of mine just as it is, but as we know time moves and folks must adapt with one's community. I was not happyto hear my neighbors had decided to sell their properties to a developer and registered my opposition on the appropriate form to the Southlake P & Z Board. My wife, son, and I then attended two spin meetings to secure additional information. These meetings allowed us to hear and see what the builder was planning. We expressed several concerns that included traffic, water runoff, and pedestrian safety. We were very impressed and pleased to see that the developer had truly thought out and addressed most of our concerns. We are pleased to inform you that Mr. Maykus has been very open to listening to suggestions made by us and our neighbors. We fully appreciate and respect that some of our neighbors want to adhere to a "1 acre minimum" for each home in this addition. My family has thought long and hard about w#iat the addition will be and how it will fit in with today's neighborhood. We fee! this addition will be an asset to our community and will allow other families enjoy our city and take part in its continued prosperity. We hope you will consider our desires for you and the council to approve this proposal. While the proposed development may not be what everyone considers perfect it does offer quality homes, leaves most of the trees, and provides additional safe sidewalks and trails. Thank you for your service and allowing our input. Sammy Belinda, & Jay Ar strong 012 Shady Ln Southlake, Texas 76092 917-713-7191 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 4 4/1412015 IOcrry of SOUTHLAKE Fwd: Shady Lane Proposal 1 message Usouthlale.tws Mail - Nd: Shady Lane Proposal Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Ken Baker <kbaker@c!.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:38 PM To: Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Sammy armstrong Date: April 13, 2015 at 7:46:17 PM CDT To: mayor@ci.sout hlake.tx.us, place3@ci.south!ake.tx.us, place4@ci.southlake.tx.us, plaGe5@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: kbaker@ci.south !ake.tx. us Subject: Shady Lane Proposal Mr. Mayor & Councilpersons, My name is Sammy Armstrong, my family and I reside at 1012 Shady Ln, Southlake. This is my second letter to state that although I was initially opposed to the new PUD request for the North Shady Ln development I am now supporting it. We have attended every spin meeting, the council meetings, and the citizens meeting regarding this developfinent. I am confident that I am the only Shady Ln resident who has communicated with both the developer and my opposing neighbors from day one. I have stressed to all parties to work together to determine what the very best options are for this land going forward. Those that are opposed have made it clear they do not want to see any type of development and feel that by insisting the developer adhere to 1 acre per home they will negate the project from going forward. They continue to fantasize a pro athelete will buy the land and build a single mansion. (note this property has been on market for over 10 years They insisted that only a "chosen favd' would attend the citizen's meeting with the developer and that no one would discuss how the PUD could possibly work. They went to the citizens meeting determined to see that there was no way the developer could build more than a dozen homes on 1 acre lots, a fact that they repeatly stated when securing the signatures for their petition. Obviously their insights were incorrect. I remain dismayed that you and the majority of the council have made it clear that the PUD is the best option, yet you will not over rule the "citizens of this neighborhood". Forgive me for being frank, but I spoke at the first council meeting and attempted to paint a picture of who truly lives near this developlment. The majority of the citizens who have led the "anti-pud campaingn" do not live near the location. Most of them live over a half mile or more away on side streets and have no interaction with the neighbors who will be most effected by the development. I attended one of the "neighborhood meetings" and it was clear that those in support would not be listened to. I was then shocked when an existing council member showed up and rallied those in opposition to stay the course which was coupled with a campaign speech for Mayor. I was not excited to see and hear the property accross the street from my home had now become campain tool! I must say I feel disinfranchised by the council. As of today I am aware of 4 residents who live within 250' of the proposal who are sending letters stating they support the PUD. There are several more who Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 5 4/14/2015 Usouthlaletxus Mail - Fwd: Shady Lane Proposal actually live on Shady Ln who verbally support the PUD, but have been silenced and defeated by peer pressure from by an aggressive campaign by those who oppose it. I personally have had numerous members of the opposition stop by my home on three occassions and while polite they strived to convince me to retract my support. They have made it clear that if they can secure the support of those living within 250' of the proposal they can mandate a majority vote by the council. I truly wish the council would offer the same value to those living with 250" of the property versus those who live on a queit cul-de-sac over a mile away. I respect the wiunteer work you and the council put forth on behalf of our beautiful city. Now is the time that I must insist that you do what is best for both those who will be most effected by the proposed development and for all the citizens of Southlake. The 2030 plan encompasses a concept that allows a master plan that more than addresses the needs of those that hope to live on larger parcels of land. I live on 1.2 acres with a vegetable garden, small orchard, greenhouse, pool, and beautiful gardens that I work in year round. To my left I have a neighbor who has lived in his home since 1974. The rear of my property is surrounded by modem day large homes on .5 acres. it's totally neat how we all respect each other's life styles and have become friends. Simply put "crying wolf' is a strategy that should never dominate sound judgement. Please step up and be the leaders our city deserves -vote YES for the PUD. Sincerely Sammy J. Armstrong 1012 Shady Ln Southlake, Texas 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 6 Notification Response Form ZA14-1a4 Meeten9 Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 Pint Gibson, Jed C Ffux Michele U 2420 Raintree Dr Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA KA11� FAX OR HAND DELlvr=RY BEFORE THE START OF THE-SCHMULED PUBLIC HEAWNG. Being the owner(s) of the property s* noted above, are hereby - In favor of �sed undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regardang your position: l tCrr. - Signature: �,•..- Date: I JA Additional Signature: i, I Date: 1 w ry Printed Narne s : aP tQ' j Musr be property uuner(s; +yhnse name{sJ are pdrYed �Libp.. ofhenerFa�e cvn ct the f'lanr��ng pe�artr;�enE. One farstt r r❑ R . Pap i� 3' Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 7 To Whom It May Concern: I, '� G►�� , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA 14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF-1A Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed �e� Date Address "2- f ..1 /ca ., t-P `e dr- -O Vr l 1- E f, Y Phone 7 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 8 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM McAllister, Marianne 1008 Shady Ln Southlake-Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (pposed9 undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: J ICCr�RT31n16 1 0 Yffg-� DDCtAlYI�AIThTIo aI V 10,'£ 6A)7'p-)76JJ AT iNt� rz-11" 16 7/l�F- PCMAL /� VekhI6 L /-pi 51 Z-E (,j Fir_ �f. ih 1) cilt v "? 1-�E55 . Tff�_ a" PA5 JLRN uPF.ed,Vr 015 ThR64Er H04OaEP WA-5 NO-7 oNf- W04� tdaNTEb 77) M,611NTf11N IHJV , &)(ilL,'- fills ��✓��/�t�SAG 15 JUI4LE 1i b416� .A10% CoA)WIA b3'(Tff iHe- 56( �-L'1u uZW06 /�bl rleI 5 AND W f+A-T ExisT.W 6 -F#i Ac r1►&L Signature: Additional Signature: Date: Date: Printed Name(s): M6P.)r-N1v Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 9 To Whom It May Concern: I, �h' 41 � 157't L , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C 1, 5E 1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF -IA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date -�// <Z Address /U 09 SYY.� ar' Ld Phone 07 4S / ,,Z.-W6 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 10 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Wright, Judy A 1004 Shady Ln Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of Lo:lppDosedto undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ,512� 0/--- �-075 5114g9v4 Signature 3/y "-�CR67 , u � Date: Additional Signature: - - Date: Printed Name(s): --7 04 I-cT66-- Must be property owner(s) whose name( are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 11 To W;re7;h It May Concern: eler-5- .dam OVI, " " , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C 1, 5E 1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF- i A Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Date Z g l Address / edey J , --Ia�Y'/G—�-., Phone 2 6 0 g S r�7 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 12 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Novakovic, Roberta 2480 Raintree Dr Southiake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of =opposedtoundecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: OL uv"$t t l�n (rc�V _ ` 1rR t`rL� - I n rl n o rk S , � v _ f Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): 41�n UfLb Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Phone Number (optional): A Date: I Date: contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 13 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Trautman, Barbara Etvir Thomas 1104.Shady Ln Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: "oVF� Signature. ' { Date: 1 t y t Additional Signature: l 1 Date: (S Printed Name(s): �L6-u LN%'4 Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise bAP,.,ARA. I ulAAA/J Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ?/ ? 1-t� 1-! P Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 14 Notnication Kesponse Form ZAP a-i" Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 610 PM PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the awner(s) of the propeity so noted above, are hereby in favor of � opposed to� undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: �'c `� _� Date: /r,2.1 /S Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): r Must he property owner(a)whose name(s) ariprint6d at lop. Date: contact the Planning Department, One form per property. Phone Number (optional): e7- %9S - oSo�, Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 15 From: Scott Moyer Date: April 14, 2015 at 7:12:58 PM CDT To: "mayor@ci.southlake.tx,us" <mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: North Shady Lane To Whom it May Concem, My name is Scott Moyer. I reside at 1010 Shady Ln. Although first opposed to the RPUD, I since have changed my position on the matter and am now in support of the RPUD. I am sure that the RPUD is the best for those in the immediate vicinity of the development. Sincerely, Scott Moyer Sent from my iPhone Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 16 To Whom It May Concern: plt'-a) L"144,01,14 a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5EI, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF -IA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed P�' Date 1PZ1 / Address Phone.'° / Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 17 From: Jean Lehmann [mail Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:41 PM To: 'mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us'; 'place3@ci.southlake.tx.us; 'place4@ci.sout hlake.tx.us; 'place6@ci.south1ake.tx.us'; 'KBaker@ci.southlae.tx.us' Subject: Shady Development My name is Jean Lehmann and I reside at 1100 Shady Lane in Southlake. Initially, I was opposed to the new PUD request for the North Shady Ln development. However, after careful review of the plan and the quality of home previously built by the developer, I support the current proposal. I understand that many of the neighbors in the area would prefer all 1 acre lots. I believe that meeting this demand would actually undermine the preservation of our immediate community, as it would mean the elimination of the "green space", making any development of the property less desirable. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jean Lehmann Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 18 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Azamar, Peter 780 Shady Ln Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (opposed to) o undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: - Ze)Al, �� A - Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): [ `-r,--`r' Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Phone Number (optional): 6 l G' lL the Planning Department, Date: , 25 Date: form per propeny. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 19 To Whom It May Concern: 1, Pe-ie-(- A 2 a "ar , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF- lA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date a' I k15 Address Phone 1-7- o'7- Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 20 To Whom It May Concern: 1, , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF- 1A Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed r-"-! rf '—�'4'VJo N Date A� /9 ao /� Address aV6 O Phone &II - �U? - 7 0 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 21 To Whom It May Concern: t a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlalce, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF -IA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date Address /i��f¢ /wzf— Phone"� u J� f C' Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 22 To Whom It May Concern: n K)residentofthe Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF -IA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signet Date Addre Phone Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 23 To Whom It May Concern: a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF- 1A Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date Address Phone _ 7 � - Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 24 To Whom It May Concern: 15 ' ` 1 , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. 1 oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF- 1A Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date Address Phone '-91 I Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 25 Forwarded message From: Celeste Segrest « Date: Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM Subject: Shady Lane Project To: KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us Please remove our names from the opposition to the proposed Shady Lane Project. Thanks! Celeste and Gene Segrest Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 26 To Whom It May Concern: I, 1!hA-f�le_ 6f��r/,JZr T , a resident of the Shady Lane neighborhood, am in opposition to the matter Ordinance No. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C 1, 5E 1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas. I oppose a) any Zoning Change on the subject property that does not conform to To the SF -IA Single Family Residential District zoning Or b) the Development Plan as it exists based on several issues, including but not limited to the too high density and insufficient set back from the street and insufficient distance between homes to conform to the current zoning and character of the neighborhood. Signed Date Address L,Aytle— mot/ LAB 7"V' -74!� o 7 - Phone Ozpf '- Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 27 Responses Received from Outside 200' U" CIF SCILITHILAKERichard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: planning and zoning commission Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM To: Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake_tx.us>, Cheryl Taylor <ctaylor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Commissioners, Please see the email below. Thank you. Hello Lori Payne, I would like this email forwarded to the members of the planning zoning commission. Dear Mem bers, am writing to your in reference of an agenda item, #7, thatwas scheduled for the meeting tonight, January22, that was tabled, Ordinance # ZA14-144, a proposed development at the north end on Shady Lane. I am in favor of the development of the properties as currently zone SF1Aand would like it to remain as s uch. i am concerned about the builder's current proposal and placement of an entrance to the development immediately south to the curve on Shady Lane. I think this is dangerous, and could potential to lead to injuries. After meeting with the builder he stated that the city's engineer has signed off on this development. When the agenda is rescheduled, can you please have the city's engineer present atthe meeting to address our concerns. Thanks. Janet Rogers Kevin Middleton 425 Shady Lane 817-310-3625 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 28 Rom Sent: ri may, February 27, 2015 3.12 PM To: mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us; place1@ci.south lake. tx.us; place2@ci.southlake_tx.us; place3@ci.southlake.tx.us; place4@ci.southlake.tx.us; places@ci.southlake.tx.us; place6@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: RE: Shady Lane rezoning, March 3, 2015 Dear Mayor and Mernbers of the citycouncil, We are writing to your in reference of an agenda item scheduled for the meeting March 3, 2015, a proposed developm ant at the north end on Shady Lane. We are in favor of the developm ent of the properties as currently zone SF1Aand would like itto remain as such. We are concerned aboutthe builder's current proposal and placementof an entrance to the development immediately south to the curare on Shady Lane. We think this is dangerous for our neighborhood, and could potential to lead to injuries. We are opposed to 2 entrances on Shadyi_ane forthe one development. Thanks for your time. Respectfully, Janet Rogers Kevin Middleton 425 Shady Lane Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 29 0 Crry OF SOUTHLAKE FW: Shady Lane Development 1 message Kosse <Kosse@maykus.com> To: dkillough@cityofsouthlake.com Begin forwarded message: From: KAYLE GREEN Date: February 5, 2015 at 8:51:30 AM CST To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Shady Lane Development Mr. Baker, Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us> Hello, my name is Kayle Green and I reside at 421 Copperfield Street in Southlake. I am contacting you to express my genuine support of the Shady Lane neighborhood development project. Since I am traveling out of town and cannot attend tonight's P&Z meeting, which I believe is open to the public, I want to express my gratitude for your services and consideration of what I believe to be an outstanding development plan. Consistent with the spirit of the Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan and its emphasis on sidewalks, green zones, tree preservation, and protection of the natural environment, it is my opinion that the Shady Lane Development, as proposed, materially satisfies the stated guidelines. Certainly, by comparison, the development holds up quite well against the other recent and forthcoming residential developments that have been approved. I have never personally met Mr. Maykus, but I know his firm by reputation. I also have seen the high quality of homes and uniqueness in his approach to designing and building custom homes. Unfortunately, he cannot develop all of Southlake residential for us ... instead, we have had to endure a litany of tract developments which are not what most of us would consider in the spirit of the 2030 Plan. Shady Lane is a gorgeous area, the proper development of which will raise the value of surrounding homes and enhance Southlake as a desired place to live. Thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to answer any questions. Kayle Green Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:13 PM httpsl/mail.g oog lexor*-oi lh#Onu i=2&i Irab1641 b8aMm ev,-pt&searof-- i nboAtFr 14b60187b0W df3&si m1=14b60187b00a1 dr3 V2 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 30 216/2015 Ci.southlale.bcu_s Mail - FW: Shady Lane Development 421 Copperfield Street Southlake, Texas 214-284-5256 Resident since 2005 9 WL-ts r. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. W F— www.avast.com htlps://mail.g oog Ie.cortJmaiUu/0/7ui=2&ilFab1641b8a8&�.ievFpt&search=inbc)gt[r-14b80187bDDaidr3&sim1=14b60187b00a1 dP3 2J2 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 31 February 24, 2015 City of Southlake, Planning and Development Services Mr. Ken Baker, AICP— Senior Director 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Development Plan for Shady Lane Dear Sir, My name is Kayle Green and 1 have been a resident of Southlake, Texas, since 2005. 1 am writing to express my genuine interest in and support of the pending Development Plan for Shady Lane. My strong support of the neighborhood development is a function of following two key factors: (i) the revised proposal for development appears quite consistent with the spirit of the Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan and its emphasis on sidewalks, green zones, tree preservation, and protection of the natural environment and (ii) the Shady Lane plat/plan, in combination with Mr. Maykus's custom build approach, will yield a gorgeous development that will compare quite favorably to many of the less attractive tract developments already approved and currently under construction. I have not met Mr. Maykus, but I am quite familiar with his work product and reputation as a successful custom developer and builder throughout Southlake and the surrounding areas. As such, I ask that you strongly consider the aforementioned attributes and recommend the plan for approval. Thank you for serving our community and for your consideration. Kind Regards, Kayle Green 421 Copperfield Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Cell: 214-284-5256 FEB2 7 2015 Dept Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 32 To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: rschelI@ci.southlake.tx.us• i Subject: Use of the City"s SOP map to establish percent of oposition to a zoning change. Dear City Council Members, The Council may already be aware of this concern as I have asked your Principal Planner" Richard Schell, AICP" to bring it your attention. ZA14-144 will be coming up for review and approval in the next couple of City Council meetings. In a meeting with Mr. Schell, it was explained to me how the opposition to a zoning change proposal was evaluated for reaching the 20% area number in the Buffer Zone shown on your SPO Map of the Shady Ln proposal. If a 20% area opposition was reached then a Super Majority of Council members would be needed for approval. The numerator in the equation is the land area in the 200' buffer that has opposition. The denominator is the total land area in the buffer. This method works great, if all area is bordered by Southlake properties, but in this unique case it does not. To the East is Corp of Engineers, Grapevine Lake, property and they will not express opposition. To the North are City of Grapevine residences, some who have received letters about the Zoning proposal change. Their letters came from the City of Grapevine after being advised of the change through our planning Department. Any opposition to the change, from the Grapevine residences is kept separate from the Southlake opposition, and not added to the numerator in your equation. This may be the correct thing to do as the city boundaries dictate certain rights. If this is the legal method then so be it. On the other hand, the land area on the SPO map in Grapevine, should not be counted in the denominator of the equation. The land area owned by the Corp of Engineers, that won't oppose, should also not be included in the denominator. This would give these residents, of Shady Ln. , an equal say with all other residents of the city, on zoning change proposals. It was said that our city attorney would probably be needed to address this concern. I have tried to contact him, but as of yet, have not received a return call. Your attention, on this subject, is requested before this zoning change comes up for vote. Respectfully, Shady Ln. area resident David Dowd ' " 214-236-3077 817-481-0083 g Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 33 r-- •,� j A i r r, - r SPO Map Shady Ln N ZA 14-144 Legend w E 0 Case Parcels 200-ft Buffer of Case Parcels S 0 SPO Parcels SPO Parcels in Buffer 300 ISO 0 300 Feet ROWArea in Buffer 0 Grapevine Area in Buffer Southlake City Limit Boundary Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 34 From; Carol Dowd Date: February 25; 20115 at 12:18:06 PM CST To: " mayor(q_) ci. south la ke.tx. us" <maycr@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: rezoning Shady Lane ZA14-144 Reply -To: Carol Dowd Dear Mayor Terrell, We are long term residents of the Shady Lane neighborhood and we bought our property because of the space engendered by a SF1A zoned neighborhood and because we loved the beauty and the country feeling_ Rezoning the Shady Lane ZA14-144 development in the Shady Lane neighborhood will be essentially allowing a pocket of medium density houses to be built into a low density housing zone from the 2030 plan. We think a much better development plan can be made than ZA,14-144. Mayor Terrell, you were elected and entrusted with the duty to protect the rules and regulations of zoning that we as citizens bought into_ Please protect the zoning that we bought into and invested our homes into and that follows the 2030 plan_ South lake strives to be the best and to take the high road. Please listen to your Shady Lane citizens. Protect The Tradition) No Rezoning. Respectfully, Carol Perusek Dowd 2900 Hillcastle Ln Southlake; TX cadowdo.verizon.net 817.481.0083 817.932.0552 cell Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 35 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:52 PM To: mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Subject: Opposition to ZA14-144 request for Zoning change {Shady LN} W Mayor. I am a mom berofthe 5hadyLn neighborhood. I use 5hadyLn as the oniyauuess to my home. lam opposed to any change to the current SF-1Azoning of the properly in question. I bought into this neighborhood in 1978. This neighborhood has always been zoned Agriculture or SF-1A. Even today people are buying residences Isere, expecting the inning to remain unchanged. The properly In question will sell, with the existlng Zoning when the Selling price and the Market price reach equilibrium. Then developmentwiil be made in compliance with the SF-1A zoning. lam looking to you to protect my investor ant and expectations. Thank you for your service to the city Regards ❑avid Dowd Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 36 From: Carol Dowq Date: April 5, 2015 at 10:35:44 PM CDT To: mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: ZA14-144 Dear Mayor Terrell, A contingent of Shady Lane neighbors met with Mr. Maykus to see his SF1A plan on March 18. The Shady Lane Neighborhood had a large meeting with this contingent to discuss the Maykus SF1A plan. The o%etwhelming consensus of the majority of Shady Lane neighbors is that we oppose rezoning. We wish the property ofZA14- 144 to remain SHA. Respectfully, Carol Dowd 2900 Hlllcastle Ln. Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 37 CrTY pt�!F �[�t �y 4.� 1 1 ll�AKE Fwd: Shady Lane Rezoning Opposition 1 message Richard Schell <rschell@cl.sauthlake.tx.us> Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:09 PM To. Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Lon Payne <lpayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Date: March 2, 2015 at 9:37:29 PM CST To: Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.south lake.tx.us> Subject: Fwd: Shady Lane Rezoning Opposition Lori - sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Suzanne Kaiser - _ Date: March 2, 2015 at 9:06:19 PM CST To: City of Southlake <mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Shady Lane Re7nninn Onnosition Reply -To: Suzanne Kaise, Mayor Terrell, oppose the rezoning of the Shady Lane property that violates the Southlake 2030 Future Plan Use, changing the zoning from SF-1A. Please consider the Southlake citizens when voting on this issue. Respectfully, Suzanne Kaiser Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 38 Mayor and Council, Please allow me to voice my concerns why I'm opposed to the proposed north Shady Lane re -zoning. • 1 think it should be consistent with the area (Shady Lane and Raintree area). • If it is allowed it would open the door for the recent disallowed development on the south end of Shady Lane. • Freddy Joyce was restricted when he developed in the Raintree area. • The area in the flood plain should not be a consideration. 0 A very big concern is the ponds. (I have never seen them dry or drop over 2 feet even in 1981 when Grapevine dropped 13 feet.) If the ponds are filled and built on in a few years when they settle and the builder is gone who is Liable? I don't want the City responsible because the City allowed building permits. If someone can sue over hot spilled coffee and win, this would be a piece of cake! Thanks for your consideration, A.C. Urbanosky Evelyn Urbanosky Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 39 From: Kate Sheffielri _ Date: March 2, 2015 at 9:06:20 PM CST To: "mayor@ci.south lake. tx.us" <mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: 480-690 (ZA14-144) John, want to be sure that to voice that I, like all my neighbors, am staunchly opposed to the matterordinance no. 480-690 (ZA14-144), the proposed zoning change and development plan for Hat Creek Development on property described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas locate at 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady lane, Southlake, TX We are all opposed to ANY zoning change on the subject property that does not conform to the SF-1A single family residential district zoning. The development plan is too dense with grossly insufficient infrastructure to support additional traffic. It's absurd to think that any person who has driven this road would ever allow such a plan to come before this body. The RPUD supposition alone is laughable given the size of the plan. What is the compelling reason to re -zone the community other than to line the pockets of someone who is not part of it? In what way does this genuinely benefit the majority of the current citizens of the community? These are the two most salient questions -whose answers easily defeat the motion. Sincerely yours, Katherine Sheffield Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 40 HAftm A. Musgrove 2423 Raintiee Or ^ r:'. w rT Soulhlake TX 7.M-5533 iills!,1111t}ujl►„fe��ar�l�l�l.jt�l:�rtlij i Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 41 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 42 From: Scott Satchec Date: February 28, 2015 at 7:13:58 PM CST To:"mayorandcitycouncil@ci.south lake. tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci. southlake.tx.us> Subject: Opposition Mayor Terrell and Members of the City Council, would like to advise you and the other city council members that I am in opposition of a zoning change in regards to the Shady Lane Neighborhood. I also plan to attend the March 3, 2015 council meeting. Thank you for your time. Scott Satcher 2725 Raintree Drive Southlake TX 76092 (Sent via iPhone) Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 43 From: Karen Sorge Date: March 1, 2015 at 11:37:17 PM CST To: rnayor@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: karen sorg Subject: Shady Lane Development Hi John, Hope you and your family are doing well. Seen such a long time since our boys hung out together. I can't quite grasp they are seniors, soon to be in college! Anyway, the reason for my writing to you is to affirm my objection to the Shady Lane Development. I purchased land in this unique SF-1A neighborhood in Southlake because it was SF-1A ! I do not feel that the restriction should be allowed to be changed for this developer. This is part of the beauty of Southlake and the restriction of 1 acre minimums should be kept. I do feel it would be quite the injustice to change it. Kind regards, Karen Sorge 2600 Raintree Drive Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 44 From. Date: March 1, 2015 at 1:54:17 PM CST To: mayor@ci.south lake. tx.us Subject: (no subject) we oppose north Shady Ln development EG and EG Standifer Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 45 From: Mark Galanos Date: March 3, 2015 at 3:00:04 PM CS i To: "KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us" <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Shady Lane Devlopement mr. baker- 1 own the house located at 2755 raintree not far from this proposed development. i am writing you to voice my strong SUPPORT of this plan. it has been thoughtfully laid out and would be of tremendous value to our city. please add this message to the response from others within southlake. thanks. Mark Galanos ci 4.448.8223 Brexen Real Estate, LLC Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 46 From: Paul Locklin [mailto Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 1:25 PM To: mayor@ci.southlake.tx_us Subject: Zoning Change in Shady Lane Neighborhood Dear Mayor Terrell, My name is Paul Locklin. My signature is one of over 150 in the petitions against RPUD zoning in the Shady Lane neighborhood. I am writing you today to let you know that I am still against changing the zoning off Shady lane to allow RPUD zoning. Our neighborhood is united and the overwhelming majority of us want to keep the SF -IA zoning that is currently in place and is so on the Southlake 2030 Future Use Plan. I realize that the Hat Creek Development proposal has been tabled for the next Council Meeting but wanted to re -express my feelings about the matter. Please hold firm to your position as a council member and do not abandon the wishes of the property owners that will be.atfected by a zoning change. Thank you, Paul Locklin 2620 Rolling Ln Southlake TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 47 Responses from City of Grapevine Residents r Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date; January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PO Box 95104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of undecided about ccf>pp-os-e�� (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date. i / y •sue Additional Sigbature: Date: Printed Name(s)-Name(s)- La Z+li 1I Must be proputy awner;s) whose name(s)re printed nt top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ;q-:,M,W-J r,,01z '-T� "V!' Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 48 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2016 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PO Box 95104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORICAS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEnULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) okhe.property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed toP�eo undecided about (Circle underlinne the proposed ,Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: rue, . I -to Signature- - -- pate; Additional Signature- Date: l ,k -t S Printed Name(s): Must be proparty owner(s) whose names) are pinled at top. Othenxtse contact the Planning Department. One fl Phone Number (optional): per property - Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 49 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PO Box 95104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: /c� Al') 2.pl-15 v Additional Signature: Date: (Jl J6n) Printed Name(s): AN-rIF--J zZ AJA7A L- /M l Fi Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): l Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 50 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PC BOX 96104 Grapevine Tx 76099 ADir c q bs60"ns4nd_4riAQ;-. m. of es D• ' Ftannin .. f ....: �/a•,. r i' d .I:ii'. 4..�r.. r.n...C.1:iR�tf�li� Li-�.J � r 'v IQ PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: was - 1`1Y'� jo DRM)1:0 rnsr 1 , ` x f d s -_K,;l f l'r Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): "AZV A. aY Must be prop" owner(s) whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise cc wefty the Planning Date: 1 l5-26/S` Date: DNS �3WE:5 One form per property. Phone Number (optional)- f) q - 6 (D9- %5 _ Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 51 r. Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PO Box 96104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. l5eing the owner(s) of the property so noted above; are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: /' �J�1/5 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s):� I f21x_L c-: )Xf2-Ts Must be property owner(s) whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 52 Notification Response Form ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6:30 PM Grapevine, City Of PO Box 95104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of 6pposedto undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature. - Printed Name(s): S Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise Date: 5 Date: the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): / 7 7Cx, ola Case No. ZA14-144 Attachment F Page 53 Notification Response Fort ZA14-144 Meeting Date: January 22, 2015 at 6;30 PM Grapevine, City Of Po Box 95104 Grapevine Tx 76099 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED rORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HARE] DELIVERY BEFORE THEATART OF THE aCHEI7t1LED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner.(s.) of..the.property- so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to' undecided about (CirCl or un erline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: km OYA-)IA b(T01' Signature: Additional Signature: _ Printed Name(s)- biol Li. rz) ark dya.(-'Thm 12ni is".- fili,w,a-c Date: Date: Must be property owner(s) whose names re printed af�tap. O�herwlse contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 54 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 55 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-144 Page 56 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-690 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 5C1, 5E1, 5E AND 5D2C, SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 20.496 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-1A" Single Family Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 1 Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 2 those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 20.496 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 3 incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 5 ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2015. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2015. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being described as Tracts 5C1, 5E1, 5E and 5D2C, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas,being approximately 20.496 acres and being more fully and completely described below: Field Notes Description for a tract of land in the Samuel, Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being that tract of land described in a deed to Clifton Wayne Johnson and wife, Patricia Ann Johnson, recorded in Volume 5430, Page 588, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Together With a tract of land described in a deed to Clifton Wayne Johnson, Clifton Wayne Johnson, Jr., and William Brett Johnson, recorded in Volume 9708, Page 1491, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Also Together With a tract of land described in a deed to the City of Grapevine, recorded in Volume 10422, Page 62, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Also Together With a tract of land described in a deed to Brian Nk�rnwv, recorded in instrunuem Number D209236430, Real Property Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Also lvguthcr 4V ith a portion of Shady Lane, to be vacated by city ordinance, and being described as one (1) tract by metes and bounds as fellows: Beginning at a 112" iron pin found in the existing east line of Shady Lane for the most southerly corner of said Johnson tract described in Volume 5430, Page 588, said point also being the most northerly southwest comer of said Nerney tract; Thence North 01 degree 08 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 252.64 feet along the existing east line of Shady Lane to a 112" iron pin found for the northwest corner of said Johnson tract described in Volume 5430, Page 588, and for the most southerly corner of said Johnson et al tract described in Volume 9708, Page 1491; Thence North 00 degree 48 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 469.25 feet along the west line of said Johnson et al tract to the existing ❑orrh4ast cxornerofShady Lane; Thence North 56 degrees 49 minutes 06 seconds West at 44.76 feet, passim the; ScnitliCMt corner of said City of Grapevine tract and the former west line of Shady Lane, in all, atotai dlstanec ol'3 k8.26 feet along the existing northerly line of Shady Lane to the southwest comer of said City of Grapevine tract; Thence North 00 degree 30 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 44.28 feet to the northwest corner of said City of Grapevine tract, and to the south line of Block 1, Parra Linda Estates, Section II, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-136, Page 34, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 23 seconds East at 251.12 feet passing the northeast corner of said City of Grapevine tract, and the former west line r+f Shady Lane; at 287.82 feet passing. the funner cast line of Shady Lane and the northwest corner of said Johnson er a tract; at 1,083.39 feet passing a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concrete monument found ("COE-Mon") for the northeast corner of said Johnson et al tract, for the northwest comer of said Nernev tract, and for the sat rthcast comer of Block 1, Parra Linda Estates, Section 1, according to tine plat r: corded in Volume 388-130, Page i 1, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; in all, a total distance of 1,465.40 feet to a COE-Mon for the northeast corner of said Nemeytract; Thence the following courses and distances along the southeasterly line of said Nerneytract: South 08 degrees 22 minutes 53 seconds West a distance of324.87 feet; South 85 degrees 40 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 233.13 feet to a COE-Mon; South 57 degrees 38 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 129.25 feet to a COE-Mon; South 35 degrees 56 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of320.45 feet; South 00 degree 34 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 218.91 feet; South 61 degrees 21minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 357.23 feet; South 20 degrees 30 minutes 59 seconds West a distance of 94.84 feet; South 87 degrees 40 minutes 59 seconds West a distance of 230.72 feet to the most southerly southwest corner of said Nerney tract and to the existing east line of Shady Lane; Thence North 01 degree 42 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 207.67 feet along the most westerly line of said Nerney tract and the existing east line of Shady Lane to the to the Point of Beginning, said described tract containing 20.496 acres of land. Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 8 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment G ZA14-144 Page 9