WS Item 4
Work Session - Zoning Change and Development Plan Shady Lane
ZA14-144
Shady Lane Work Session Overview
Purpose - Have City Council discuss the merits of the two (2) possible
development plans for 20.5 acres located on Shady Lane:
- Residential Planned Unit Development (R-PUD)
- Single Family (SF-1A) Residential Plan.
Staff will provide a comparison of the proposed Residential Planned Unit
Development (R-PUD) Plan to an alternate Single Family (SF-1A) Residential Plan.
Comparison data includes Zoning, Tree Protection and Development Related
Criteria.
Staff Question(s)/Council Discussion
Aerial View
RPUD Development Plan
SF1 A- Development Plan
Questions?
Owners: Brian Nerney, Clifton Wayne Johnson, Patricia Johnson, Clifton Wayne Johnson, Jr., William Brett Johnson, City of Grapevine
Applicant: Hat Creek Development
Requests: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Shady Lane to develop eighteen residential lots and three open space lots on approximately 20.5 acres.
Location: 853, 909, 1001 and 1015 Shady Ln.
ZA14-144
Development Regulations
Development Regulations
Tree Preservation Plan
2030 Pathways Plan
Wall/Fence Exhibit
Planning and Zoning Commission:
February 5. 2015; A motion to approve the item, subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30, 2015 and the staff report dated January 30, 2015, noting for the record
that the applicant has agreed to articulate on all lots, but especially on Lots 8-15, thirty (30) foot and thirty-five (35) foot setbacks prior to going to Council with the application
and will address a percentage of how that will come to fruition, that the applicant will build a sidewalk on the northwest portion of the project on Shady Lane, noting that the applicant
has agreed to clean up the creek on the south side of the project, also noting the applicant’s willingness to present to Council a second rendering of Lots 8-15, which would have a consistent
southern boundary as opposed to the meandering drive as is shown now so that that can be more fully addressed by Council, received a (3-3) vote.
A subsequent motion to deny the item also received a (3-3) vote.
ZA14-144
Alternate B
Alternate C
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Questions?
Utility Plan
Drainage Area map
Sight Visibility