The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6ECITY OF S0UTHLA1<,.,E Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT January 14, 2015 C�ilRi Q 0[o fillEla `V, PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Glenmore EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Centurion American, G&A Consultants, LLC, is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Glenmore, consisting of 16 residential lots and 3 open space lots on approximately 19.519 acres, on property described as Lot 1 R1, Block 1, Owens Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 800 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agriculutural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood # 6. REQUEST DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Glenmore, consisting of 16 residential lots and 3 open space lots on approximately 19.519 acres. This proposal complies with the Low Density Residential designation in in the 2030 Land Use Plan, which requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Glenmore (ZA14-111) is being processed concurrently with this request. City sewer is not currently available to the site, so the lots will be served by on -site sewage facilities (septic systems). The nearest sewer manhole locations from the proposed Glenmore Trail street are approximately 975' to the west at the east line of Ginger Court and 880' to the east within the Shady Oaks office complex. A dry pipe sewer system that extends to all the lots and to the development borders is required by City Ordinance for future connection to City sewer when it becomes available. The required dry sewer system is shown on the utility plan. ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (Link to PowerPoint) (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated November 13, 2014 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA14-112 -Tit•1 "fel :tell] ki 113 1 ki 1701 N ►yi /el I Eel ki APPLICANT: G&A Consultants, LLC OWNER: Centurion American PROPERTY LOCATION: Generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of Shady Oaks Dr. at 800 W. Southlake Blvd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 R1, Block 1, Owens Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (Medium Density Residential proposed) CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956 and given the "AG" Agricultural District zoning designation. - A preliminary plat (ZA93-020) for Lot 1, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved June 1, 1993. - A final plat (ZA93-021) for Lot 1, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved June 1, 1993. - A plat revision (ZA98-039) for Lots 1 R and 2, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved May 19, 1998. - A Zoning Change and Development Plan and a Preliminary Plat for Glenmore that proposed sixty-one (61) residential lots and four (4) open space lots on approximately 39.512 acres were withdrawn at the August 7, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at the applciant's request. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The site is designated "Low Density Residential", which specifies single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential development is consistent with this designation. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. Southlake Blvd. to be a Farm -to -Market road with 130' of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows an 8' Multi -Use Trail programmed along the north side of W. Southlake Blvd. and an On -Street Bikeway on W. Southlake Blvd. The Pedestrian Access Plan shows the existing 6' sidewalk along the north side of W. Southlake Blvd. to be expanded to 8' in width. A 6' sidewalk is provided along the portion of the open space lot that abuts Shady Oaks Dr. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-112 Page 1 Maior Corridors Urban Design Plan The property is in the "Estate Residential" zone in the Major Corridors Urban Design Plan. The following recommendations pertain to the "Estate Residential" zone in the plan. ■ Reinforce and enhatice the distinct "Estate Residential zone" character by recommending the planting of 6 — 8 foot high shrubs along residential fences that require frequent maintenance along the corridor. This would not only screen existing residential uses from the busy roadway, but also create green edges along the roadway. New residential neighborhood fencing should be limited to masonry, stone and wrought -iron style fencing materials, with tree and shrubbery planting in a naturalistic manner on the parkway side of the fence_ TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Preserve and reinforce the existing character of the estate residential with parkway plantings and trail ametuties as recommended in the plan. ■ Master planning of larger residential or commercial tracts, or multiple tracts, is encouraged over piece -meal development. In addition, the master plan applications should include all the elements of the built environment such as building design, site design wayfuiduig and building signage landscaping, treatment of natural features, bridges, streets, street lighting, etc. Every effort should be made to incorporate recommended urban design elements into the project design. aim! r�urola w.A*A W �e1� ca.vdi�+e�tr 'ili�+rr++F" ,a4 wNr�.++rd st +sa+ywty infawvr.P� aF-fiowerw+-�, a.-r+PMp, s J F rvI ac.�`�li Gl Wi� Vbt� �ylGj 1�I� Resomrnended parkmmy design along the Residential Estate area sboming the --l—arpathmay; informal tie planting, and stone identity marker at key lorahms. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development shows one street access onto W. Southlake Blvd and one street stub to the property to the west. W. Southlake Blvd is currently a six lane divided arterial. Staff recommends providing a street connection to Shady Oaks Dr., which is a two lane undivided collector, so the traffic counts for that section of roadway have also been included below. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-112 Page 2 W. Southlake Blvd. (between Shady •. .. 24hr East Bound (25,998) West Bound (24,997) AM Peak AM (2,725) Peak AM (1,327) 7:15AM-8:15AM 11:30 AM — 12:30 PM PM Peak PM (1,752) Peak PM (2,719) 1:00 PM— 2:00 PM 4:45 PM — 5:45 PM ShadyOaks Dr. (between E. Highland St. & Dove -. 24hr North Bound (2,028) South Bound (1,862) AM Peak AM (338) 7:45 — 8:45 AM Peak AM (334) 7:45 — 8:45 AM PM Peak PM (248) 3:30 — 4:30 PM Peak PM (251) 3:15 — 4:15 PM * Based on the 2013 City ofSouthlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact Single Familv Residential 1 16 1 153 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition 10 WATER & SEWER: The property will be served by an existing 12" water line in Shady Oaks Dr. and a connection provided by the developer to an existing 12" water line in W. Southlake Blvd. at the southwest corner of the Shady Oaks Office complex. City sewer is not currently available to the site, so the lots will be served by on - site sewage facilities (septic systems). The nearest sewer manhole locations from the proposed Glenmore Trail street are approximately 975' to the west at the east line of Ginger Court and 880' to the east within the Shady Oaks office complex. A dry pipe sewer system that extends to all the lots and to the development borders is required by City Ordinance for future connection to City sewer when it becomes available. A dry sewer system is shown on the utility plan. TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Plan shows that there is less than 20% existing tree cover on the site, so Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D requires a minimum of 70% of the existing canopy to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve approximately 72.4% of the existing tree cover. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on September 23, 2014. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: November 20, 2014; A motion to deny the request was approved (5-2). CITY COUNCIL ACTION: January 6, 2015; A motion to table the item to the January 20, 2015 meeting was approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated November 13, 2014. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-112 Page 3 Vicinity Map 800 W. Southlake Blvd. ZA 14-111, ZA 14-112 Zoning Change and Concept Plan Preliminary Plat N 0 650 1,300 2,600 w e Feet s Case No. Attachment B ZA14-112 Page 1 Narrative Letter SIITPLANNING CIVILENGINLLRING PLAT LING CONSULTANTS, LLC LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCI IITECTURP. 0 THPF Finn Nu. 1798 '1'NPLS Finn Nu. 10097700 September 2, 2014 Mr. Ken Baker Director of Planning & Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Glenmore — Zoning Change Request to SF1A G&A Job No. 13104R Mr. Baker: Please accept this letter, on behalf of Centurion American, as an explanation of the proposed Zoning Change Request application for approximately 19 acres of land generally located north of FM 1709, just west of the Shady Oaks Drive intersection. We are requesting a Zoning Change application to change the existing zoning, which is Agricultural, to Single Family Residential (SF1A). The Zoning Change Request is in conformance with the City's Land Use Plan which designates this property as Low Density Residential. A companion Preliminary Plat application has also been submitted to the City for review and includes preliminary utility layouts and a preliminary drainage analysis. The proposed development is a residential subdivision to be known as Glenmore and includes a total of 16, one -acre residential lots. The property is currently being used for residential purposes with two large homesteads as well as agricultural purposes including barns and other accessory structures. Therefore the street network and lot configurations were designed around these home sites to give them adequate size and access. The entrance will be from FM 1709, at the existing median opening across from Stone Lakes Drive, and a future connection to the adjacent property to the west has also been provided. We are proposing that the lots be serviced by onsite sanitary sewer facilities since they are 1 acre minimums. We look forward to working with the City on this project and please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments. You may also refer to the proposed Preliminary Plat which has additional information. Thank you in advance for your consideration of the presented request. Sincer y, - Randi L. Rivera, AICP Senior Planner randi(@Racon.com cc: Mr. Jack Dawson, Centurion American Mr. R. Von Beougher, P.E., G&A Consultants, LLC Z:\2013\13104R\PDFs & Submittals\Zoning\1310411 ZONING LOI 090214.doc 111 Hillside Drive • Lewisville, TX 75057 • P: 972.436.9712 F: 972.436.9715 610 Byron Nelson Blvd, Suite 114 • Roanoke, TX 76262 • P: 682.831.9712 F: 817.890.4043 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-112 Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN i � Sou1 ping. LaOesAdd Zonint: 5F20A j LUD: edium ; I Density esidential i fir. ,v oanP. ,S edr.ae' — I,N -o,¢ r ______ _______ ______ ____I ;,•__ __ IF _____s _____ _________' __9 I I P it ` \ \ / }/ J are N., M�—. G Han xo eHE Addioon l9 Cab. A, =2877 Zoning: SF1A LUD: Low Density / II. Residential II E1, F" Tract 3H lames E. Stary end oI,.— G, Sary v .21061, PG. 897 Zoning: AG LUD: Low Density Residential Low IF — xo—n arms . / am, I N BB'N•6Y N 8Y1 aAa„ /iiJf •r^krPoo, I?v<�* r�'91_ __ ____-___- t f , n II ----- r-=mr s rs. MB■ i'r7.IJ' --,— II Ze.. ur. ` — — —I—Is I va Eo— I \ II II m rrr r Cab. gNLeal17 _ Zoning: AG N.,. -- 'B,Y,.m ,d Irk — — LUD: Low Density I as Residential 'asP, x 8568.10' , I_J�—� M^\,'..��^� \ • R lOG Hall No. 686 Addlclon C,h,A,S'de10111 Zoning: SPI LUD: Office da.� As \ �r I iCommercial �Ne.e lii r I, Ij i?a N 88'f6'f0• g 95929' - - M1709) L_ (13fY R.O.w-) ua Nture U d Use oesignaU,n Low Density Residential EAisting Zoni ng AG Proposed Zoning SF -LA Residential Lot Quantity 19 Residential Dwelling Units 16 Gross Acres 19,519 Interna1511eets 1.051 Net Acres 17.217 Gress Density Ido/acl 0.929 Case No. ZA14-112 Attachment C Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT sou 'RmewLeedAdd Non Zonin�:d 'IDA I oosrNO. . 15, LUD: ERESal DRnc. EDensityesidential I Ensr 15' .no "Sal oRrc 91T 661. —- __________, L_____ _________ _ _____ ___________I unE541 ' �� L J LOT. urlL Esur /I II OR— Ql`15'ESRL _ � \ �•L\ \ aefi7 �+� �� I II LBG Hall Na. 586 Addition I \'•� / c / 11 Cab. a sild. zen \ �/'�.a'`•a.�`\��,_/ aq'b'�/ d / I II y Zoning: SF1A i t ,0"r / I i ► LUD: Low Density ' Residential PROP. 50' I '�'ba 7k ACCESS ESN w I II I$ DRNNADE k 60' EAS. nr _=4 lAma7 II ia ia Ro.w. I — — aewrw'E d — — �I y LNBC(rC(Yw .Y4M' - s9BYTA E a$W'- I D�RIDjG ESYTS' LOTS \•o zed PROP. , — - ion Tr 3H $ I DlR ESHT 47, J p DMVD. ESML n IL � wv IY7sLx — —..11 — I I HH67 I LOT S lames R. Story and Wife• �SIPE._$ B_ Va` CRS Sharon.. star 'Illm� / _ — J I PROP. ,o• N86'49'59.6 •EtA• S '03.8 VOL 21061, PG. 897 ncl l 6 /0 % / I/z' caE unL €Sur 702.91' o rl k� ltsw7 �b / era•- xearYz•w17_____--___-_a 6B. Zoning: AG IISL— I /� I II ^ate I �______ I --asses 1n-Ds LUD: Low Density o zo' soE s.e— zrr A�ccE°ss Ea�.,r r-=_ar_sa� ---- - S B6'44'25� B BO•"*%°TM+OP %".r Ac¢ss Residential x i i-- weevrm•r aasar ( ='•'Nay`— I j uoEr pla ,D' 777.19' EnsEUENr = I x L unL ESAT _1E s• m I PROP. 2" PPW. IS' APFDES1RRIkAN DRnc. Eswr I I \ " w ~I ! ORlac. E.T cass ESNT AOCES5a�A4R.7 I $ O t� L4 1 �•H o w asr.W g I I aE%r 7 A f — — — 1 s I$� -o rren 3I PROP. III �wA• l al%, 7 I Ir Lo, zR m Zoning: SH-A 1 �, � _ — — — -- II Owe, lid 431 TIL Esu�l IW '� cab. A, seas a3v LUD: Low Density 1 _ Zoning:AG B I I xesH•Rrw n].As' /I nmllm'F Residential I A15607 / �ss%• LUD: Low Density Residential ACCESS ESIT FOR —P.., TURXARouwD I �" _tea✓ � I ax.3cer7 k N 88'56•fO' I - - s —$toA R]fa41� E \ 'dd,, — I IR 48.95' NImYYwNE mer Nab aa�a``�- VTIL ESYT sr I I FRCEI 'B 7 obi LBG Hall No. Addltion V11L ESYT ' PROP tD-' H'xr' 6H6 C b. A, Silde 10111 i II� fAANCXISE \ I II 2 I VnL E9uT. \ >b4 \ itl � Zoning: SP1 LUD: Office I NI�# \ 1 I ij m Commercial LD I Laan7 xD. EsuT I/r f 'LMDES' N 88'46'40' A 553.23• se n' - - 3 - - - _ West-SQuthlake Bnuleyard (EM _ R 1709) - - - - - - - - — • (130R.O.W.) J -- _ a ,oe v.sml,n T W T - - - - - Case No. Attachment C ZA14-112 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS FROM TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Conclusions Based upon the analysis findings described above, the following conclusions can be drawn: Intersection Levels of Service —The addition of development traffic has no impact on the operating conditions of existing traffic. The overall intersection Levels of Service (LOSs) for existing AM and PM conditions, and with development traffic added, were found to be the same, at highly acceptable levels (LOS B in the AM and LOS A in the PM) at the intersection analyzed. However, on an approach basis, Glenmore Trail, the development access street intersection with W. Southlake Boulevard, is expected to operate at LOS E in the PM peak traffic hour. It is anticipated that, in order to reduce the delay that will be expected to occur at the W. Southlake Boulevard intersection, some development motorists will re -direct their departure from the development by turning right and exiting to the west to avoid the heavier eastbound traffic on Southlake Blvd. This should improve the LOS for the development approach, since the required average delay reduction in to move from LOS E to LOS ❑ will only be 2.6 seconds. It should also be noted that, with the significant reduction in the size of the development, the application of the City of Southlake Traffic Impact Analysis Threshold Worksheet for the development project shows that all criteria are met. This completed worksheet is provided in Appendix ID. 2. Left Turn Lane Requirements - Since a median opening and an exclusive eastbound left turn lane already exists at the intersection of W. Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Glenmore Trial, no additional left turn lane is required. 3. Right Turn Lane Requirements — Since the combination of the W. Southlake Boulevard speed limit and development right turning volumes do not meetthe TxDOT requirements for a separate right turn I'ane, none is warranted. 4. Access Drive Spacing — Since the distances between the development access street, Glenmore Trail, and the adjacent development access streets and driveways exceed the TxDOT requirements, no spacing modifications are needed. 5. Sight Distances — The generally flat terrain and straight roadway alignment in both directions from the subject development access street intersection with FM 1709, as well as the extra obstruction -free area created by the wide right-of-way, will allow for good sight distance and traffic operating safety conditions. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-112 Page 4 Consultant's Review of Traffic Impact Analysis 7�1Erc enanr:r::qinc November 12, 2014 Ms. Alex Ayala, P.E. City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 320 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Review — Glenmore Trail Residential Dear Ms. Ayala: ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA Per your request, we have reviewed the updated traffic impact analysis for the proposed "Residential development on W. Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709 at Shady Oaks Drive)" prepared by Kelly & Associates and dated October 24, 2014. The study reviewed replaces a previous study originally dated October 23, 2013 and was prepared in response to changes in the proposed development. The currently proposed development now contains a total of 16 single family residential lots. From a traffic operations standpoint, the development does not generate significant traffic volumes and is proposed to have access to the existing roadway network at one location along FM 1709. Based on our review of the revised study, and the proposed 16 lot development size, no additional analysis is needed at this time. The development is predicted to have minimal impact and the traffic generated can be accommodated by the existing roadway network. The development does not require a right -turn deceleration lane. If you have any questions, please contact me or Jody Short at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide traffic engineering services to the City of Southlake and are available to address any additional comments or concerns. Sincerely, John Denholm III, P.E., PTOE Lee Engineering TBPE Firm No. F-450 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1660, Dallas, TX 75234 (972) 248-3006 office (972) 248-3855 fax I www.leeengineering.com Page 1 of 1 Case No. ZA14-112 Attachment C Page 5 JUSOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: ZA14-111 Project Name: Glenmore SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #6 Meeting Date: September 23, 2014 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twelve (12) Host: Craig Rothmeier, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Randi Rivera, G&A Consultants; et al two (2) City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I; Ken Baker, Senior Director of Planning and Development Services City Staff Contact: Richard Schell, Principal Planner: (817) 748-8602 or rschell@ci.south lake.tx. us Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.citvofsouthlake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation: The property is located at 864 W. Southlake Blvd. Development Details: Proposed zoning change and concept plan with preliminary plat for the development of a 16-lot SF-1A — Single Family residential subdivision. The property is currently zoned AG — Agricultural District. The property is approximately 19 acres. The original zoning and comp plan amendment request was denied in June 2014 and withdrawn. This plan has been revised to comply with the land use designation in requesting straight SF-1A zoning. Two (2) of the existing homes are proposed to remain. The applicant stated they are proposing to preserve over 80% of the existing tree canopy. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-112 Page 1 Presented at SPIN: + V CADG m Glenmare 19 A qr ,� PROPOSED PLAN r a P r 1 axe ' QUESTIONS/CONCERNS: • What size are the homes? o We will comply with the minimum size required, however, we anticipate the homes will be 4,000+ square feet. • Will you be tying into existing sewer? o No, SF-1A zoning allows for septic. We will, however, be providing the pipe for future connection when it becomes available. • What is the size of the property? 0 19.5 acres. • What is happening with the skinny piece that connects to Shady Oaks? o That piece has been labeled 'X' lot and will be owned and maintained by the HOA. It will be used as a water utility easement and also access easement for the existing home to the south_ • What fencing is proposed on the southern border? o Each homeowner / builder will construct fence in compliance with regulations in any areas that do not have existing fencing. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-112 Page 2 • What about street lighting? o And street lighting will comply with city requirements. • I do not see a drainage plan... o We are currently working on the required sewer plan to show the pipe. Drainage will be controlled through easements, inlets and detention facility as required. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-112 Page 3 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Glenmore APPLICANT: Randi Rivera G&A Consultants 111 Hillside Dr. Lewisville, TX 75057 Phone: (972) 436-9712 E-mail: randi@gacon.com Review No.: Three Date of Review: 11/13/14 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Jack Dawson Centurion American 1221 N. 1-35E, Suite 200 Carrollton, TX Phone: (469) 892-7200 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/03/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. The property is already platted as Lot 1 R, Owens Addition, so a Plat Revision or a Plat Vacation must be processed and recorded prior to approval and recording of a Final Plat. Staff recommends providing a street connection to Shady Oaks Dr. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The submitted Tree Conservation Plan shows that there is less than twenty percent (20%) tree cover across the property. A minimum of seventy percent (70%) of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved and the applicant is proposing to preserve 72.4%. An 8" water line is proposed to be installed within an easement along the south property line of Lot 19X and north property line of Lot 13. The proposed water line will cause the alteration of existing trees on the east end of Lot 19X and on the north side of Lot13. If the trees are designated to be preserved and they are altered they will be required to be mitigated. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 1 Existing tree credits are being proposed to be taken for existing trees within the south bufferyard along West Southlake Blvd. Upon inspection for the acceptance of the subdivision the trees taken credit for must be in healthy condition or they will be required to be replaced. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Updated Traffic Impact Analysis reflecting the current site plans has been received. 3. Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 3. Dry sewer pipe system shall be installed for future use if not providing sewer per Ordinance No. 440 and 514. Provide sewer taps for each lot. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 2 4. The City does not allow the 8" sewer line to be land locked as shown along the western property line so that City crews cannot access the line for maintenance in the future. Please relocate the proposed 8" dry sewer line located along the western property line onto Glenmore Trail or work with City staff to determine an alternate sewer line location. 5. Civil construction plans shall require finish floor elevations shown on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets. Plans shall include addresses for future reference when sewer is extended to this development. Minimum size for water lines and sanitary sewer is 8". Nearest sewer manhole locations from the proposed Glenmore Trail street are approximately 880' to the east and 975' to the west. Manholes are located along the east property line of Ginger Court to the west and within the site of the Shady Oaks office complex to the east. Sanitary sewer main locations to this site are further than 100'. Development shall require septic systems. Refer to Tarrant County website for requirements. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Water lines and sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standard. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 2. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site/concept/development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #20 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($214.29/Acre). Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 3 Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre - construction, construction and post -construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: klements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for residences over 6,000 square feet. (per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.3.1.3 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. aIC7All Ae1kiIAlois] iyiliyiIA0111& a Fire apparatus access, public street, needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (minimum of 80,000 Ibs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un-sprinkled homes. Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 4 Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 r)kao(o-)ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 14 new dwelling units= $42,000.00 will be required. Fees will be collected with the approved developer's agreement. Pathway Comments: Provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. A Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right -Of - Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Other informational comments? The screening wall must have articulation per the Corridor Overlay District to match other subdivision walls along FM1709. It shall not run in a straight line without being offset by a minimum of 6 feet every 60 feet and it shall not be located closer to the right of way than one half the width of the required bufferyard. General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting for this project was held on September 23, 2014. All lots must comply with the requested SF-1A zoning regulations. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 5 Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected concept plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. The property is not served by City sewer, so please note the following section from the Zoning Ordinance (also see Public Works comments and attached related ordinances in the staff report for ZA14-111): C�]T �ill'f7i�a0 • �f:�i�CY�iLTiirc�rc�i[ HEALTH REGULATIONS: SEWAGE DISPOSAL - If the permitted use is not to be immediately served by a sewage collection system connected to an approved community treatment plant or public sewage facility, then such use shall be connected to an approved on -site sewage facility (OSSF) designed and constructed in conformance with the methods and standards approved by the State Department of Health, City's Plumbing Code, and Ordinance No. 514. Where the use of an on -site sewage facility (OSSF) is to be employed, the minimum lot size must be one acre per family, residence or commercial structure, with a minimum usable area of at least one acre, and the use must be approved by the City Council of the City of Southlake. The minimum usable area requirement of one (1) acre per lot shall exclude all areas of the lot (As amended by Ordinance 480-JJJ and 480-VVV): a. In any flood plains as identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM); b. In any drainage and flowage easements; and c. Having topographical limitations as regulated under the standards for on -site sewage facilities in the Texas Administrative Code Chapter 285. For properties proposing an on - site sewage facility, a plan is required that shows the type and location of the on -site sewage facility, topography of the site, location of spray fields, all easements, impact on any existing trees, and any additional information required by the Authorized Agent responsible for on -site sewage facility permitting and inspections. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-YYY.) All lots to be served by a private or septic system must have that system installed in accordance with Ordinance No. 514 and any other applicable city ordinances. Occupancy of any building or structure shall be prohibited and no certificate of occupancy issued unless the provisions of this subsection and of subsection 33.13 are fully complied with. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA14-112 Page 6 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Glenmore 722 403 111 9 713 10 !01 ,0 1203 ^ 307 303 305 ( 309 311 313 315 31T 0 1204 1202 1200 300 302 30C '�' Og �� 312 3t4 316 318 320 470 150 `0 1120 � F a U wo 0 K R RD% OfY o W w 1.¢ �EDOM LN o� 1100 100 OJd Q� 0,2 640 620 D W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 800 660 600 702 500 480 410 300 400 N 19 an eo3 FM. 1709 p 1p v0 702 � t01 2m 10 'o D 100 tp 103 705 �p1 102 W 527 v 475 465 445 425 351 0 om w m 7000 918 0 3�1101 91g 101 o Y ^010I 7�e/ t09 10 ~ 103 'ems 102 435 g105 t10 9�v W t 113 7p 105 y 2 O ^ 7,ag 702 2 203 112 Q 107 SPO 1. Owner Clarkson, Daniel J ZoningPhysicalAddress SF20A 306 BLANCO CIR •Response 0.46 NR 2. Stiefel, Richard M Etux Becky SF20A 310 BLANCO CIR 0.48 NR 3. Ruestow, Gregory Etux Linda SF20A 316 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 4. Stengle, Eric J Etux Donna D SF20A 318 BLANCO CIR 0.46 U S. Roosma, John Etux Cindy SF20A 314 BLANCO CIR 0.46 O 6. Miritello, John G Etux Anne SF20A 312 BLANCO CIR 0.47 NR 7. Stacy, James R Etux Diane C SF1-A 1000 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.13 O 8. Southlake Shady Oaks Buildings SP1 640 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.14 NR 9. Wm Real Estate Ltd RPUD 1001 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.39 NR 10. Smith, Joe V AG 803 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.98 NR 11. Jogerst, James Etux Katrina RPUD 101 WOODGLEN CT 0.60 O 12. Hall, Mark RPUD 103 WOODGLEN CT 0.36 NR 13. Nick, Jeffrey A Etux Carol I RPUD 100 WOODGLEN CT 0.54 NR 14. Thompson, Hugh A Etux Janet L SF20A 313 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 15. Hamilton, Jay Scott SF20A 315 BLANCO CIR 0.47 NR 16. Brett, Kevin Etux Susan SF20A 307 BLANCO CIR 0.53 NR 17. Randolph, Whitney Etvir Greg SF20A 309 BLANCO CIR 0.48 NR 18. Baker, Joseph R Etux Jill H SF20A 311 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 19. Hahn, Charles Etux Jessica SF20A 317 BLANCO CIR 0.59 NR 20. Sales, Taft L Etux Keeva SF20A 319 BLANCO CIR 0.50 NR 21. Norman, Kyle B Etux Catherine SF20A 320 BLANCO CIR 0.56 NR 22. James, Rhonda & Cassie James SF1-A 430 SHADY OAKS DR 3.22 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 1 23. Highberger, Rhonda Etvir Larry SF1-A 310 SHADY OAKS DR 1.10 NR 24. Stacy, Randall W SF1-A 300 SHADY OAKS DR 0.98 O 25. Stacy, Ronald T Etux Barbara K SF1-A 330 SHADY OAKS DR 1.04 NR 26. Stacy, Roy J Est SF1-A 320 SHADY OAKS DR 5.61 NR 27. Cadg Glenmore Llc AG 800 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 19.71 NR 28. Fountain Five Zero Two Tr AG 250 SHADY OAKS DR 10.22 NR 29. Southlake, City Of CS 315 SHADY OAKS DR 5.15 NR 30. Southlake, City Of CS 285 SHADY OAKS DR 7.14 NR 31. Southlake, City Of CS 275 SHADY OAKS DR 3.88 NR 32. Meeks, Scott J Etux Monica R SF20A 308 BLANCO CIR 0.63 NR 33. Stacy, James R Sr Etux Sharon AG 980 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.24 NR 34. Wayland, Marcus D AG 817 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.90 NR 35. Timber Lake Res Assoc Inc RPUD 100 TIMBER LAKE PL 2.82 O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Thirty-five (35) Responses Received Within 200': Five (5) — Response forms attached plus two (2) green cards in opposition from the November 20, P&Z meeting from property owners within 200' who spoke in opposition - Attached Responses Received Outside 200': Fifteen (15) - Attached Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA14-112 Meeting Date: November 20, 2014 at 6-30 PM Stengle, Eric J Etux Donna D . 318 Blanco Cir Southlake Tx 76€192 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING_ Being the owner(s) of the property sta noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided Ibout�) (circle or underline oriel the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): Must he property ❑VVr[en(S) Whose name(s) qte p.irited at top_ Phone Number (optional): w a � Date:l Date:l ,— —wise wnw�ci me rtannjrtg uepartment. One farm Per p:-operty, Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 3 Notification Response Form ZA14-112 Meeting Date: November 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM Roosma, John Etux Cindy 314 Blanco Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of Qo Cps d to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: l Signature: Additional SignatE Printed Names): Must be property owner(s) who Phone Number (optional): 116 45-bib Date: I Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 4 Notification Response Form ZA14-112 Meeting Date: November 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM Jogerst, James Etux Katrina 101 Woodglen Ct Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the�roe�qy so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about circ,"Fe—or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: `/ v Additional Signature: ell - Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. Phone Number (optional): Date: Date: u - to r form per property. Case No. ZA14-112 Attachment F Page 5 Notification Response Form ZA14-e12 Meeting Date: November 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM Timber Lalm Res Assoc Inc 1600 Preston Park Blvd Ste 101 Plano Tx 75093 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed`w undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: We arc stroalgly against this concept plan and zoning change. 1 have living in Timber v Lake subdivision for the last 15 years. It has been extremely dangerous to get on the Soutblake Blvd. from 'Timber Lake subdivision (Timer Lake Place), especially to make a left turn to get on West Bound Southlake Blvd to drop of the kids at the Carroll Senior High School. There wi11 be very few seconds when both sides of Southlake are cleared for oncoming traffic. There are normally long waiting lines especially in the morning time to enter Southlake Blvd. during those few seconds which comes in every 5-10 minutes interval. This site plan indicates the entrance Aril) be located just across from the entrance of the Timber Lake subdivision. This will create extremely hazardous situations for the residents of both subdivisions. Unless the city or Texas Department of Traffic is planning to install a traffic light, we are very against this zoning change and concept plan. Signature: Date: lr l f t'q-1 Additional Signature: Date: -4C Printed Name((): •%� 41 Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning oepadmenL One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 6 Not>flca#ion (Response Form ZAI4-112 . Meeting Date: NOVeMbor 20, Z014 at 3:30 PM Timber Lake Res Assoc Inc 1800 Pm tan Paris Blvd Ste 101 Piano Tx 7=3 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELNERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted abovs, are hereby in favor of posed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: V'_0 h'vY? a --- Or-) -�W'5 l o tid . #o v i'n " / h a vl /7 /1 Signature: data: Additional Signature: Fete: Pflnted Name(s): 46PI Ueiv, Must be pmpefty awneKse whu" name(a) era p6nied at top. OthwMee cvntao! thd Manning Depa"gnt Or►e iarrn p ptlrprape Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 7 &,Zog Oonmmssxon Meeting '" comment Form i3 yievis on ari Agenda Item,. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 8 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 9 Responses Received Outside 200' a�.. rr Y -Ij F SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southiake.tx.us> FW: Glendora Estates 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:24 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> For your case file - --Original Message -- From: Sherry Berman _ Sent: Monday, December 01, zu14 3:22 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glendora Estates Dear Mayor and City Council members, I have been following the Glenmore project from the beginning and this neighborhood has come a long ways from where it was 17 months ago. Although it is not perfect it is so much better than from the 67 homes they wanted originally. They are not asking for variances. I spoke with Randi Riviera and asked if they could put a trail out onto Shady Oaks so the residence could walk to the new community center. She said that they could do that. There is a matching entrance/exit to Timberlake and we have been very concerned about having 4 cars trying to enter the intersection all at once. We felt this was a huge issue with the medium density proposed earlier but do not see it as much of a problem with the current plan. I know P&Z wanted a road through Shady Oaks but there are several of us from Timberlake's that see that as an issue. If traffic backs up on Shady Oaks, then cars will be cutting thru the Glenmore neighborhood to get to 1709 faster. We also know that this neighborhood is in the middle of acreage on both sides We hope that the rest of the open space will also develop into 1 acre homes. That will make is consistent with Ginger Estates which are also one acre lots. I know the developer wanted to buy the Stacy Property but the Stacy's wanted too many concessions (homes for his kids) and keeping a barn etc. We feel the developer has gone back to the drawing board and given what was asked of them which was to follow the land use plan. This plan follows it now and fits into the 2030 plan. hope that you will support this developer on this project. Thank you for your time, Sherry Berman 818 Parkdale Dr. Timberlakes Subdivision 817-329-2970 817-371-9966 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 10 { f! Y 'F�f' SOUTHLAKE Fwd: Glendora Estates 1 message Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> -�,)A i(-r-! r ( Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:29 PM To: Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori - sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Sherry Berman <sherry.berman@me.com> Date: December 4, 2014 at 6:18:12 PM CST To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Re: Glendora Estates Dear Mayor and City Council members, Thank you so much for your support on the Glenmore project. We really appreciate it. I just have to laugh, I did not realize I called the Glenmore Estates in the subject line Glendora estates.... isn't Glendora the bad witch in a children's show? Sherry On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Sherry Berman Dear Mayor and City Council members, I have been following the Glenmore project from the beginning and this neighborhood has come a long ways from where it was 17 months ago. Although it is not perfect it is so much better than from the 67 homes they wanted originally. They are not asking for variances. I spoke with Randi Riviera and asked if they could put a trail out onto Shady Oaks so the residence could walk to the new community center. She said that they could do that. There is a matching entrance/exit to Timberlake and we have been very concerned about having 4 cars trying to enter the intersection all at once. We felt this was a huge issue with the medium density proposed earlier but do not see it as much of a problem with the current plan. I know P&Z wanted a road through Shady Oaks but there are several of us from Timberlake's that see that as an issue. If traffic backs up on Shady Oaks, then cars will be cutting thru the Glenmore neighborhood to get to 1709 faster. We also know that this neighborhood is in the middle of acreage on both sides We hope that the rest of the open space will also develop into 1 acre homes. That will make is Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 11 consistent with Ginger Estates which are also one acre lots. I know the developer wanted to buy the Stacy Property but the Stacy's wanted too many concessions (homes for his kids) and keeping a barn etc. We feel the developer has gone back to the drawing board and given what was asked of them which was to follow the land use plan. This plan follows it now and fits into the 2030 plan. hope that you will support this developer on this project. Thank you for your time, Sherry Berman 818 Parkdale Dr. Timberlakes Subdivision 817-329-2970 817-371-9956 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 12 Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlakeAx.us> FW: Comment on Glenmore Development 1 message _ Lori Payne <lpayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hbiake a@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Mark Falkenberc Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201411:00 AM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Comment on Glenmore Development I am a homeowner and resident in the Timber Lake Community of Southlake. I have followed the proposals for the development of "Glenmore", the 20 acres that are located across 1709 from Timber Lake. I have no objection to the current proposal for development of 16 one -acre residential lots. I want low density zoning to remain in place. Mark C. Falkenberg 706 Shomcrest Drive Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 13 crrr pp sOt.rrHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Southlake Zoning for Proposed Glenmore 1 message .LA / 11 Z Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:32 AM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.south lake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori -sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Cathy Leu __ _ - __.....,,- Date: December 2., cu14 at 7:32:25 AM CST To: <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Southlake Zoning for Proposed Glenmore I live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. I want the low density zoning to remain. Thank you, Cathy & David Lee 705 Timber Lake Circle Southlake, Texas 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 14 ICITY Of SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: We support low destiny zoning in Southlake 1 message 2 L( f 12 Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:24 PM To: Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: " MitziLong` _ Date: December 1, 2014 at 10:16:17 PM CST To: <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southiake.tx.us> Subject: We support low destiny zoning in Southlake Dear Mayor and Southlake City Council members: I live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. I want the low density zoning to remain. Warm Regards, Johnny and Mitzi Long 913 Edgemeer Lane Southlake, TX 76092 Timberlake Resident since 1997 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 15 IDOTT or SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Glenmore - Timber Lake Resident 1 message ;,) Al i-(_ I l I I/ Z Y P Y @ Tue, _.. Lori Payne <I a ne ci.southlake.tx.us> Dec 2, 2014 at 4:29 PM To; Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Laura Luloh [ Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:28 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glenmore - Timber Lake Resident I live in the Timber Lake Community, and 1 have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. 1 went the low density zoning to remain. Thank you for listening! Laura Luloh 505 Timber Lake Way Southlake, TX 76092 817-713-7162 Sent from my iPhone Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 16 13CITY (X SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: 1709 Development aka Glenmore 1 message : IIglc(--1 l Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci,southlake.tx,us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Thomas Nusspickel [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 5:31 PM To:'mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us' Cc: txnuss@verizon.net Subject: 1709 Development aka Glenmore Good Afternoon, live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community, aka Glenmore. I want the low density zoning to remain. Thank you, Thomas & Kristin Nusspickel 704 Shadow Glen Dr. Southlake, TX 76092 REAL TIME RESOL117ION5:: Thomas Nusspickel Senior Vice President - Consumer Operations w 214.438.5477 /1 m 302.275.3890 Case No. ZA14-112 Attachment F Page 17 Southlake, TX 76092 a u Lori Payne <lpayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:59 PM To: Holly Blake <hblake@ci.south lake. tx.us>, Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori - sent from my Phone Begin forwarded message: From: Lynn Pettigrew Date: December 3, 2014 at 2:30:21 PM CST To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Glenmore I live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. I want the low density zoning to remain. Thank You Lynn Pettigrew 804 Ridgedale Court Southlake, TX 7609 Lynn Pettigrew Administrative Coordinator for Family, Men, Women CollegeNoung Adult and Emerging Ministries White's Chapel United Methodist Church 185 S. White Chapel Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 817-481-4147 ext. 219 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 18 C rT'y' OF SOUTH Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlakeAx.us> FW: Glenmore 2 messages �42 4 1 q_ 10 1112— Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> For your case file From: aundrea ree' Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:42 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glenmore I live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. 1 want the low density zoning to remain and think this is a great use of the land. Thank You Aundrea Reel 702 Lakehurst Ct Southiake, TX 76092 Lori Payne <lpayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> For your case file From: Craig Reel Sent: Monday, December 01, 201412:45 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glenmore 1 live in the Timber Lake Community, and I have no objection to the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for 20 acres across from the Timber Lake Community aka Glenmore. I want the low density zoning to remain and think this is a great use of the land. Thank You Craig Reel 702 Lakehurst Ct Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 19 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: FAVORABLE vote for GLENMORE Property requested 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:48 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori - sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Frances Schad Date: December 1, 2014 at 6:25:49 PM CST To:<mayorandcitycnuncil@ci.south lake, tx.us> Subject: FAVORABLE vote for GLENMORE Property requested Dear Council Member — As a resident of the Timber Lake Subdivision I respectfully request that you VOTE IN FAVOR OF the zoning change and concept plan for Glenmore on property described as Lot 1 R1, Owens Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 800 West Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, being presented at the December 2, 2014, City Council Meeting. I am in favor of the zoning change because the proposal is for 16 one -acre residential lots, the developer is honoring the low density zoning, and the plan will comply with the City's current land use plan and the City's 2030 Plan. Please recognize this proposal for an opportunity to show the citizens of Southlake that you take the current City's land use seriously and that you are committed to low density growth. Thank you, Frances Scharii 302 Timber Lake Drive Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 20 IUCrry Or SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Thank for favorable Glenmore vote 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southiake.tx.us> Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Frances Scharli I _...� Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:02 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southiake.tx.us Subject: Thank for favorable Glenmore vote Council Members - thank you for supporting the Glenmore development last night, December 2, 2014. As a Timber Lake resident and a citizen of Southlake I think you made the best decision for future Glenmore neighbors and all of Southlake. also believe City residents greatly appreciate the Council's action as it indicates that you are committed to the 2030 plan and take seriously low density zoning. Again thank you, Frances Scharli Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 21 Holly Blake <hblake@ei.southlakeAx.us> FW: Proposed Glenmore Community 1 message 2 q-!// 1 J/ Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlakeAx.us> Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11;03 AM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlakeAx.us> From: Marcellette Shermar Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:20 AM To: mayoranddtycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: , t; i° Sub jCLU rioposed Glenmore Community Mayor Terrell and Council, have been a resident in the Timber Lake sub -division for 20 years and have no objection to Glenmore, the 16 one -acre residential lots proposed for the 20 acres across Timber Lake. I feel very strongly about low -density zoning remaining in this area of Southlake due to growing traffic congestion and access into the neighborhood. Thank you for your service to our community, it is a pleasure and an honor to be a Southlake resident. Marcy Sherman Marcellette Sherman, CFRE Executive Vice President North Texas Commission 8445 Freeport Parkway, Suite 640 Irving, Texas 75063 972 621-0400 x 707 a 17 707-7710 cell Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 22 IDc rry OT SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Glenmore Development - support for Low Density Proposal 1 message Lori Payne <lpayne@ci.south lake.tx.us> Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:33 AM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori - sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Lee and Sally Simpsoi Date: December 2, 2014 at 6:37:43 AM CST To: mayorandcitycounciI@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glenmore Development - support for Low Density Proposal Dear Mayor and City Council, We have lived in the Timber Lake Community for 17 years. We want to express our support for the current proposal for development of Glenmore for the following reasons: --LOW density of 16 one acre homesites on 20 acres - currently zoned LOW density and no change in zoning required —meets the guidelines of the City's 2030 Plan —no variances being requested —minimizes the impact on traffic ingress/egress to 1709, directly across from Timber Lakes, due to LOW density --buffers the Glenmore residential development/traffic from future commercial development at the Shady Oaks/1709 location, by NOT providing ingress/egress onto Shady Oaks --provides road access to the LOW density zoned property directly west, where the current homeowners have indicated a desire to sell for residential development —if/when future development directly west of the property occurs, a second ingress/egress for this community could be built directly across from the Stone Lakes (eastern) entrance While we support this development, we would like to see the following: --more open green space/medians at the entrance along 1709, to be consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods: Timber Lake, Lakecrest, Stone Lakes, Southridge Lakes —trails/paths thru development to Shady Oaks and 1709 (to access community center, Bicentennial Park, nearby intermediate and high schools) —request by the City to TxDOT to consider installing traffic signal at the 1709 ingress/egress for Timber Lake and Glenmore; or alternatively a request for traffic signal at Stone Lakes (eastern entrance) and future ingress/egress point for land/future development west of Glenmore Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 23 Thank you . Lee and Sally Simpson 509 Timber Lake Way Southlake, TX 76092 817.488,2526 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 24 Ct y OF SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Glenwood development 1 message/�-- Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:49 PM To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Lori - sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Laurie Stark Date: December 1, zu14 at 6:23:35 PM CST To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Glenwood development Dear Mayor and City Council, My husband, family and I have lived in Southlake for over 20 years. During that time we have watched as one development after is built. We live in Timber Lake, across the street from the proposed Glenwood development. I would ask you to please stick with a low density option of one acre lots in this development. Southlake Blvd. has become a nightmare with all of the retail development, especially around Town Square. I would passionately request that you approve only low density housing across from Timber Lake so that the traffic does not get any more treacherous for those of us trying to leave the development via 1709. Thank you for your consideration. Laurie and Colin Starks 307 Timber Lake Way Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 25 IDr-rry Of SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southiake.tx.0 FW: My Support For Low Density Development Of The Gilmore Projec 1 message 2 Vq Al— f' J �/ Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 To: Ken Baker <KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hbiake@ci.south lake.tx.us> From: Warren Wit Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:08 AM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southiake.tx.us Subject: My Support For Low Density Development Of The Gilmore Project Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, My wife and I support the low density developemnet of the Gilmore project. Best regards, Warren & Melinda Witt 709 Timber Lake Circle Southlake, TX 76092 817.481.9644 (H) Case No. Attachment F ZA14-112 Page 26