2014-08-26 Meeting Report (Pieter Andries Jewelers)
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO. ZA14-059
PROJECT NAME:
Pieter Andries Jeweler
SPIN DISTRICT:
SPIN # 8
MEETING DATE:
August 26, 2014; 6:00 PM
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Nine (9)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Randy Robbins and 4 others
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Robert Garza, RPGA Architects, 817-332-9477
Email:robgarza@rpgaarchitects.com
STAFF PRESENT:
Patty Moos, Planner I and Jerod Potts, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT:
Patty Moos, Planner I: (817)748-8269 or pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at 2525 E. Southlake Boulevard.
Project Details:
Project is an expansion to the existing building due to professional burglary
Addition in southwest corner is a two story shop with security overlook
East addition is a porte cochere for client security
Green space and offsite parking on the adjacent property, parking construction paid by
adjacent property owner and landscaping paid by Pieter Andries Jeweler
Architecture and articulation to match the existing building
The plan presented at SPIN:
Pieter Andries Jeweler Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Building Elevations
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
What are the site lines and accessibility to the site?
The security force is off duty police officers and the parking will benefit both
properties.
What about the neighbors and a two story building and their privacy?
This is a commercial property with no residential adjacency.
Is the new parking pavement permeable?
This could be considered.
Is the exterior façade consistent with the existing facility?
Yes.
Meeting presentation ended at 6:40 pm
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.