Loading...
Item 7CCITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT November 25, 2014 CASE NO: CP14-003 PROJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment for Edwards Park Addition Lots 1 and 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: REQUEST DETAILS: Clayton and Clayton Real Estate is requesting approval of a Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential for the development of 2 residential lots on approximately 2 acres for Edwards Park Addition. SPIN Neighborhood #3 Clayton and Clayton Real Estate is requesting approval of a Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential for the development of two (2) residential lots. Ik PaF er Sp -.vC nsily Ra n�isl 1eliumC s RBitle�Rial PublM5anrPuhlm E COVE R❑ BLACK FORE __�BL CK OREST CensityR ke pe i R ident' L'•v D., Rxi 'W C E K Ty RB � a O a go�n� q 80U10 R � LL MEAD cy Existing Land Use Designations —Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential land use category is defined by the Southlake 2030 Comprehensive Plan as: "The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which excludes acreage in all public Case No. CP14-003 Page 1 rights -of -way. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories described previously. The Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of Southlake. " The applicant is proposing to designate the 2 lots as Medium Density Residential land use designation. The applicant's proposed development complies with the Medium Density Residential land use category, which is defined by the Future Land Use Plan as: "The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single- family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories previously discussed." While the development being proposed is consistent with the Medium Density land use designation it is not with the Low Density designation. This application is being processed in conjunction with a Zoning Change and Concept Plan under Planning Case ZA14-131 and a Preliminary Plat under Planning Case ZA14-132. blic Pak! =r _Ee _ '." C= s ry Rx dent EOOVE R❑ BLAC,"" e ORE ST C=.r>'rty R i!e pe kept L'ry a R till Lom Dmsl Resftl o[ia C E K mR a $ O BpuOE &L Bp ULp R ti ism ae��r��. C au:e � LL M EAB Proposed Land Use Designation —Medium Density Residential ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1st Reading Approval of the Land Use Plan Amendment ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Support Information - Link to Power Point Presentation STAFF CONTACT Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Patty Moos (817) 748-8269 Case No. CP14-003 Page 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Brian and Robin Bulatao APPLICANT: Clayton and Clayton Real Estate PROPERTY SITUATION: 825 E. Dove Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1A1C of the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 525, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. EXISTING LAND USE: Low Density Residential PROPOSED LAND USE: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-30" Single Family Residential District HISTORY: September 19, 1989; City Council approved the "AG" Agricultural District with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 480 and the Official Zoning Map. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on November 3, 2014. A meeting summary report is included as Attachment `C' of this report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: November 20, 2014; Approved (6-1) subject to the Staff Report dated November 14, 2014. WCommunity DevelopmenhMEMOIComp Plan Amendments120141CP14-003 - Edwards Park Addition- 825 E. Dove Case No. Attachment A CP14-003 Page 1 Vicinity Map Edward9 Park Addition �00 gO I g8p 70B 740 780 E. Dove Road 774 5D' 21 21M "} 774 iL50 700 74 TT-5 t a 71 2113 i} o `I4 210B 2109 W o r+ 2104 21US lit V 804 641 CA So? $ 80 875 Sol s 313 917 20 1 9 J A7 4M 9,2 m ,4 4 2= 2jin LL �1-9 1 may{ p P'14-003 Land Use Plan Amendment 0 90 180 360 Feet Case No. Attachment B CP14-003 Page 1 Support Information F�1 z 1 c 1]�ilaFa 3x li{Fi'� �7•!I i 1F� ��� � d e FFf7�� a $lila!! ;�s�f ;x 3 ` Q d7Ia7 1, fl 1F1sEl�. 1.14i laln JM s Qa W - m oY W a� �-- IIIIIii �fi COD ij 79 pl HIMSBLI-lYl 0�93� 3 s SSs 1��9at Il P3i;rxiF$1 iF °Yayggx �aa�a&169i CHEYENNE P_!!LAI ,ga N ,,.r..v —srcu— 1 I d---- = — — --- --- ---- jYlei V � I Case No. Attachment C CP14-003 Page 1 ton October 13, 2014 64ton Kct;iI IC_,it7tc City of 5outhlake Planning Department 1440 Main Street, Suite 310 South!ake, Texas 76092 RE: Plat, Zoning, [nnrept Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment To whom it may conoem: We are requesting a plat, change In zoning, and comprehensive plan amendment. Hlstorv, The property in 21010 was used as a single family residence on the north part of property and a place of business and storage on the south part of the property, Tarrant County still shows the property taxed in two parts residential and commercial. The improvements have all been removed. Surround1ngAreai an the North side of Dove Road properties are Low Density Residences. On the West side of the subject property, the property is part of a Medium Density development Estes Park (lot sling is 20,000 plus square foot). On the South side of the subject propertyr the property is part of a Medium Density develcpmen t Estes Park (lot slung is 20,01X plus square foo#), On the East side of the property, the property is Estes Park a medium density development- This one lot is platted as a one acre lot. Bases for Request: The subdivision Ordinance #483 requires a minimum lot site of 30)OW square adjacent to a platted property of one acre or greater. Our proposed property will fallow the ordlnance requirement of two 30,D00 square foot lots and serve as a buffer to the other 20,000 square foot lots as was intended in the ordinance. The two lots will be Lot 91- 33,029 net square feet and lot 92 •34,511 square feet. Jmprovements to Area- The 52 foot dediratipn on the north part of the property will allow for future expansion of Dove Road without the need of purchasing rlght -of -way. The sidewalk will be continued through the property along Dave Road (122 feet) and wall allow for safe pedestrlan traffic. the connecting of the present dead end street Castle flock Orive t❑ a new Cul-de-sac (60' radius) will enhance the safety of the adjoining property owners as well as the completion of sidewalks. The sidewalk completion will allow residences within Estes Park to walk through the development safely. in summary, we believe the development of these two lots meet the objectives of the ordinance, effectively meet the objectives of the appropriate growth of Southlake, as well as improve the CltVs Infrastructure - Respectfully Submitted, Arthur H. Cla�t:on Mobiile BI1.821.0114 Karc-rl C. Young Ma6tle 917.291.5500 Ko6erlt 1=_ Clayton Mobte 817.U4.4 152 make Fax 817-124.0884 4ssvcote fax 91 7-424.ON4 4�seca(e Fax 817.424.0884 cl�ymnandcl�poa�mfrixan 1 cl�anrtakso�e�rerimnne� cl�tonurdehy6orr�gnrlxom PO Box 92700 • Southlaka,Texas 76092 • www.claytonandclaytonrealestate.corm Case No. Attachment C CP14-003 Page 2 USOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: ZA14-131 Project Name: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Edwards Park Addition SPIN Neighborhood: 3 Meeting Date: November 3, 2014 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 10 Host: Monique Schill Applicant(s) Presenting: Art Clayton City Staff Present: Patty Moos, Planner I City Staff Contact: Patty Moos, Planner I, 817-748-8269 Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.citVofsouthlake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: • Applicant is seeking a zoning change and plat for 2 SF-30 lots located at 825 E. Dove Road for SPIN #3. • Existing 2 acres on the south side of E. Dove Road. • Currently low density land use surrounded by medium density use • Plan to visit with the Estes Park HOA and neighborhoods • Building a cul-de-sac at the end of Castle Rock Drive instead of building a street thru to Cheyenne Park Lane. • 4-foot sidewalks around the cul-de-sac and 6-foot sidewalk along E. Dove Road. • Landscape bufferyard along E. Dove Road. • Water line extension, fire hydrants and sewer connections going in with the development. QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: 1. Estes Park HOA- Is the cul-de-sac going in? Yes 2. Where do the lots front? The north lot fronts on E. Dove Road and the south lot fronts on Castle Rock Drive. 3. Concern about the south lot benefiting from the Estes Park HOA for the landscape maintenance and holiday lights without participating in the cost. No. Trying to correct the missed connections. Houses will be high quality 4,000 sf minimum. 4. Immediately adjacent homes are 6,000 sf+ and prefers the houses to be larger, if Case No. Attachment C CP14-003 Page 3 possible. 5. Wants quality of the home to be comparable to Estes Park homes. Will be a quality constructed home with energy efficient design. 6. Wants to be able to have the HOA be involved in order to have input in the architectural control and wants to work with the developer to have a level of comfort with the house architecture standard. 7. What will be the size of the house at 825 E. Dove Road? Lot 1 will be a minimum of 4,500 sf with piers, walls with energy efficient standards, well build with many high end details. 8. Will the sidewalk be installed on E. Dove Road? Yes. 9. What are the sideyard setbacks? 20-feet. Presentation: 6:00-6:30 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C CP14-003 Page 4