Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item 6I
CITY OF SOUTHLAI<,-E Department of Planning & Development Services ��:adrill 0=:»ll:aI November 25, 2014 CASE NO: ZA14-100 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Southlake Town & Country EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant Cencor Realty Services is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Southlake Town & Country for the development of six (6) commercial retail buildings consisting of approximately 165,034 square feet of floor area on approximately 26.13 acres located at 500 W. State Highway 114. SPIN Neighborhood #3 DETAILS: Cencor Realty Services is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Southlake Town & Country for the development of six (6) commercial retail buildings consisting of approximately 165,034 square feet in size on two lots, the dedication of right-of-way for Kirkwood Boulevard and one lot is to remain undeveloped on the east side of Kirkwood Boulevard. The total acreage for the Preliminary Plat boundary is 55.29 acres. A Site Plan for Southlake Town & Country (Planning Case ZA 14-099) is being processed concurrently with this request. This plat is consistent with the proposed development. ACTION NEEDED: Consider Preliminary Plat Approval Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated October 31, 2014 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses (F) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Daniel Cortez (817) 748-8070 Case No. ZA14-100 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Dove 114 Infinity, LLC APPLICANT: Cencor Realty Services PROPERTY SITUATION: 500 W. State Highway 114 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1 F and Tract 1, J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620 letkIDIP IN111111567el1*101low*lI= CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY: - During the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 in 1989, the "AG" Agriculture District zoning was placed on the property. - On May 6, 1997 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from "AG" Agriculture District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District under Ordinance No. 480-220 (Planning Case ZA96-130). TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development is bound to the west by the frontage road of State Highway 114 and Dove Road to the north, a four -lane divided arterial. With the development of this site the applicant is planning to dedicate the right- of-way to construct a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard that is adjacent to the site. Kirkwood Boulevard is shown on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan at ultimate build -out as a 100-foot, 4-lane divided arterial. Based on the site plan submitted there are 7 driveways total that will access this development. Two Driveways are located on the frontage road of State Highway 114 and also along Dove Road, and the last three are located along Kirkwood Boulevard. There are also six right turn deceleration lanes being provided at Driveway 1, Driveway 2, Driveway 3, at Kirkwood Boulevard, Driveway 5 and Driveway 6. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was developed by the applicant for this project by the DeShazo Group dated April 24, 2014. The Executive Summary of this report can be found under Attachment `C' of this report. The City's consultants, Lee Engineering, reviewed the TIA and they provided comments back to the City that were provided in a letter and were sent to the applicant. The City has since met with the applicant regarding these comments and the applicant has provided additional information. All of these comments can be found under Attachment `C' of this staff report. SH 114 Frontage Road - Exit Ramp to Dove Road. (019W) BoundWest 8:45 AM 00 . 00 PM Dove Road — Between State Hwy 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. (019W) Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 1 AM Peak (414) 7:30 AM — 8:30 AM (347) 7:15 AM — 8:15 AM PM Peak (302) 5:00 PM — 6:00 PM (366) 5:00 PM — 6:00 PM * Based on the 2013 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Sh000ina Center 34 1 7.087 1 104 1 66 1 297 1 322 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7rh Edition UTILITIES: Water There is an existing 12-inch water line and 18-inch water line along Dove Road that has the capacity to serve the development. The applicant has also indicated they will be constructing a public 12-inch water line along Kirkwood Boulevard to the south boundary of the development. Sewer The development will connect to two existing 8-inch sanitary sewer lines located at N. White Chapel Boulevard with 8-inch lines. TREE PRESERVATION: The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance allows for any development which was platted or approved under a concept plan prior to September 1, 2005 to adhere to Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B, rather than the current Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D. A Zoning Change and Concept Plan were approved by City Council in 1997 for this property; therefore, the site plan must comply with the requirements of Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B. The City's Landscape Administrator has made an assessment of the applicants Tree Removal and Protection Plan that can be found in the staff report for ZA14-099 under Attachment `E', Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated November 14, 2014. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates this development area as Mixed Use. The following information provided below is from the Consolidated Future Land Use Plan, as it pertains to the Mixed Use land use designation, adopted March 20, 2012 under Ordinance No. 1022. Purpose: To provide an option for large-scale, master -planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. Definition: The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 2 Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher - intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance -free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Mixed Use category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Retail 30% ±20% Office 35% ±30% Residential 15% ±15% Open space 15% ±15% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% 'These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. Scale and Context Criteria: General: ■ Buildings and their pedestrian entrances are to be oriented towards internal streets. ■ Larger -format retail uses (with footprints larger than 40,000 s.f.) shall be located adjacent to the arterial or highway with pedestrian entrances from internal streets. Retail and Office Uses: ■ Pedestrian -oriented or automobile -oriented. Hotel Uses: ■ Hotel uses should be full -service hotels at market -driven locations, primarily in the S.H. 114 Corridor. Full -service, for the purposes of this plan, shall be hotels that include a table -service restaurant within or directly attached to the hotel. Other services or amenities typically included would be bell service and room service, as well as available meeting space. ■ The desire is to approve hotels adequate to support market -driven commerce in the City, paying attention to the product mix such that the hospitality services in the area are complementary to one another. Single-family Residential Uses: ■ Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses. ■ Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 3 They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses. Single-family residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Open Space: ■ Consider environmental elements as "features," rather than constraints. ■ Emphasis shall be placed on preservation of existing wooded areas and stream corridors. ■ Avoid channeling or piping of streams. ■ Streams or creeks should become a focal point rather than the rear of the development. ■ Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors. ■ Well designed and integrated open spaces are critical to the creation of successful mixed -use neighborhoods. ■ Open spaces should be designed to add value to proposed development and not as an "after -thought". To that end, open spaces should maximize frontage along residential and office uses. Open spaces shall occupy a prominent place in the development of a neighborhood and form the center pieces of a community. ■ Open spaces are intended to be the "front -yards" and invite passive recreational activities. Open spaces may be in the form of pocket parks, children's play areas, squares, linear greens, and conservation areas. ■ Use the topography as an advantage, do not flatten the site. ■ Preserve views. Civic Uses: Civic uses such as day -cares, post office, police substation, local government offices, churches, etc. are encouraged. Ideally, civic uses should be located centrally in the development and provide convenient access to all other uses and activities in the development. Civic uses are to be designed to the scale and context of the neighborhood. Uses are encouraged to be appropriately scaled to the proposed development and generally limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet of built area. Overall Character and Design: ➢ Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly. ➢ Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10'. ➢ Buildings are to be oriented towards other buildings (across the street) or towards open spaces. ➢ Minimize the impact of surface parking. ➢ Mix up land uses to maximize shared parking. Street Design Standards: ➢ Internal streets to be designed to accommodate both automobiles and pedestrians. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 4 ➢ Streets to be designed with curb and gutter. ➢ Interconnected street network. ➢ Regular blocks and streets. ➢ Block widths between 400' and 600'. ➢ Design speed <25 mph. SH 114 Corridor Plan The subject site is located within the State Highway 114 Corridor Plan area that was adopted under on March 6, 2012 under Ordinance No. 1021. A copy of this entire plan will be provided to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council in their packets. Maior Corridors Urban Design Plan The Urban Design Plan was adopted February 5, 2008 and contains recommendations for private development. The following information and recommendations are from the Urban Design Plan as it pertains to private development: • Gateway/Identity Fratures © Tower QBtldge 6nhancemente ., ® Low Monument Sign > OEmbankment Enhancements 1Yai1 Amemry Locevan - • D—I.pmcntldentity opp--it➢ T*v "Special consideration should be given to S. H, 114 with respect to both the public and private realms. The SH 114 Corridor is over 200 feet wide and traffic travels an average of over 60 mph. This means that the City's development identity must be shaped with bold strokes which can readily be discerned by a person driving at a high speed with limited peripheral vision. In addition, the elevation of the road changes dramatically in relationship to adjacent and distant land parcels which provides views into some adjacent properties. Given the scale and impact of the highway facility on the cty's existing fabric, creating a sense of place along its corridor is challenging with just public realm improvements. Private development can, where appropriate, complement and enhance the investments in the public right-of-way. To this end, the following are specific recommendations for private development Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 5 along the S. H. 114 corridor: f ■ Preserve existing natural view corridors where appropriate. Specifically, tree stands along the highway should be preserved when they terminate views from the highway. ■ In order to maximize regional access and limit the impact of strip retail development, retail and restaurant development should be concentrated at interchanges in 1-2 storey buildings with higher intensity office and institutional uses at mid block locations. Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along the highway, specifically at mid -block locations. Buildings should be 4 — 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low -profile, single storey pad buildings that tend to blend into the background and have limited visibility from the highway are discouraged. All windows on buildings should be vertically oriented and be articulated with a 4-inch reveal to avoid solid, flat walls, and to create shadow lines and surface texture. Glass curtain walls and facades with more than 60% glass along any elevation shall be discouraged. Along retail store fronts, 1 ' — 2' high knee walls shall limit the amount of glass along each fagade visible from public streets. ■ The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited. Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and pedestrian accessways. Structured parking is encouraged over surface parking. Specifically, shared parking is also encouraged between adjoining complementary land uses. Special attention should be given to the design of parking garages to avoid plain facades with views of parked cars from adjoining properties and rights -of -ways. Fagade details, vertical and horizontal courses such as cornices, lintels, sills, and water courses should be used to add interest along facades. To the extent possible, parking garages should be located behind principal structures to limit views from the highway. All developments greater than 10 acres should be broken up into blocks which can provide easy circulation by cars, people and emergency vehicles, and which interconnect with adjacent properties where possible. This will also facilitate reinvestment and possible redevelopment in future years. ■ Master planning of larger tracts or multiple tracts is encouraged over piece -meal development. In addition, the master plan applications should include all the elements of the built environment such as building design, site design, wayfinding and building signage, landscaping, treatment of natural features, bridges, streets, street lighting, etc. Every Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 6 effort should be made to incorporate recommended urban design elements into the project design. PLAN FOR UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY LINES Implementation of the recommended corridor improvements will considerably improve the visual appearance of the city's major corridors. However, the presence of overhead utility lines and utility poles along the city's major corridors will continue to limit this effort. To this end, the burying of overhead utility lines is a critical complement to the recommended design improvements. Based on existing development and the potential for future development, this plan recommends a prioritization plan for burying overhead utility lines. Although the cost of burying overhead utility lines can be fairly expensive, they can be offset by the aesthetic benefits that will ultimately increase property values, benefiting both adjacent property owners and the city in the long run. Due to limitations on the city's ability to regulate utility companies and the placement of utility lines, this plan recommends a public -private partnership approach to addressing this critical issue of burying utility lines. The City's participation to offset the difference in costs between overhead and underground utilities could include a range of options including zoning entitlements such as mix and intensity of uses, developer's agreements, economic development agreements, TIF reimbursements, and other incentives. During this planning effort, all overhead utility lines along major roadway corridors were identified. Based on existing, pending, and future development, a prioritization plan was developed. The plan on the following page categorizes the burying of overhead utilities. ■ Priority should be placed on the frontages of Southlake Boulevard, Carroll Avenue, and S.H. 114 in the immediate vicinity of the Town Center area. ■ Large, undeveloped tracts along the S.H. 114 corridor should be prioritized. Due to the visibility and high profile nature of development along this corridor, this plan recommends a public -private partnership approach based on new development proposals. ■ Coordinate and prioritize the burying of overhead utility lines along Carroll Avenue from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 in the city's CIP. ■ Bury overhead utility lines in conjunction with roadway improvements to take advantage of cost savings that may be available due to the need to move utilities. ■ Along corridor segments with existing development, prioritize and coordinate the burying of utility lines with major redevelopment of the parcels. " Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 7 Mobility Master Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends for this portion of Kirkwood Boulevard to be a 100-foot, 4-lane divided arterial roadway. As such, the applicant is proposing to construct two lanes of Kirkwood Boulevard leaving the remaining two lanes to be built in the future, potentially if the adjacent property develops. The plan also contains one specific recommendation at the intersection of Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Road which reads: As the property develops to the south of this interesction, traffic is anticipated to increase. A study will be necessary to determine a form of traffic control at this intersection. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 8 Ref. No. Traffic volumes will increase as property to the south develops MT26 and the intersection is built for the continuous connection of Kirkwood. Consider signalization or other traffic Conduct a study of management the Dove/Kirkwood devices at the intersection. intersection of Dove and Kirkwood. Mobility, Efficient Infrastructure, Mobility C1, C2, CB04 Options 3.3, 3.5, 3.9 PW The Pathways Plan recommends for a less than 8-foot sidewalk along the south side of Dove Road and the west side of Kirkwood Boulevard and an 8-foot sidewalk along the east side of Kirkwood Boulevard and the frontage road of State Highway 114. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6-foot sidewalk along the south side of Dove Road and an 8-foot sidewalk on the west side of Kirkwood Boulevard and along the frontage road of State Highway 114 meeting the Pathways Plan recommendations. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: October 9, 2014; Approved to Table (7-0) to the November 6, 2014 meeting. November 6, 2014; Approved to Table (5-0) to the November 20, 2014 meeting. November 20, 2014; Motion to recommend denial (5-2), passed. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated October 31, 2014. WCommunity DevelopmentWEMO12014 Cases000 - PP - Southlake Town & CountrylStaff Report Case No. Attachment A ZA14-100 Page 9 Vicinity Map Southlake Town & Country 40 208 402 209 N 212 p 213 n 217 a 301 114 Q 305 ,J 422 U $ m m p 400 309 iQ 2308 S 2309 100 7 0 80 2304 2305 0 165 185 245 26 N101 500 .Y 2300 2301 684 600 W DOVE RD Y 685 NN as �� 2� 1p1 OJ, 112 116 101 105 109 11 12 00 112 114 ti� 204 Q 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD �,ZLI-],01 00 LT 01 Gco N 114 di S ZA14-100 z. - Preliminary Plat 11 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA14-100 Page 1 Plans and Support Information ' e•�••��'••_r�••>'S- Jn'ALM3n �t13•40 LY0OIB't WI=Y]hOIB Yet 8101 sna.'ur+w�uivuwi Aamnoo? NMQL 3xvIlm os r ■aaoLaim// ,... ,�� .....- 1naixvrwn,3na .e €_§, Z I "PR • -In- �• J� ga �: 1$$� � t 7 I �f 3Y���YF�� s;Ay a r � Iggli a I� y;� 3 � $� IM pia 5>�g��� ��'���a = _�_y. �c-EYr-" 7 IOIIrA*7(IW 1�rlq 1J! � � — — s7 S .4p . aura • snvw° — a Ma `� 0 5 t tll - I34, Lanooaiwaw I= IJg y 1 9F9��� � .�:.:>; I ' "I • i , i amRI 3 • I . 6$<>' jf is I 1 I l '•¢,$3nEf':�'� $S�Y� I I I " 4. OOOWIYOI '�::f�yj'_:<: •.:✓{'•� w �` Y IN p nq 9. a y a Il III W 61 1! • II I ib 5� I I I; s is� ;-yUyI MIX Ell Ili I I d I a 3Y6�IIII ' lJ —41 Case No. ZA14-100 ffiE��C� •_ .t, Attachment C Page 1 "....�^y ..':� ".: `". ••'. OIOLL StlX31'NOLSf H OW 3IS'A NO1SOOHM LCBB on'wN�i n � anon z MJONi' � ioi p+o' � �aoie'z 4 t sioi na � N E CA•,q 11°°�'" '�" svr3i'ALNra�LNvaari D2Y1 ONL3V iS9V'A3 tlreu3AMP-H rS3VW Yyt�aeory y� Qismja�Qjb �„ AUNnoo Y NMol gwww Elos 1nawmawl3aa „„ :.nx m d • b a yy �aFi�o8ag s g� 1yW z =Y iaem B ,5,5 �SQ�QSj��$$�E��diF! 6 <tl� �gg® �ki d® OFF€qW 7�� WHY 8�StllY3tl��ds € y6d gg- e CURUR `jz^F9 �a t;, €aai ,Mi ;e it, a far a 3 ! [ � p3`e Z �b ➢jti ° § 4 5�e dE €#N if g1'y ! • 3� .9 yy[ f 3 Y� P - yyxs3 Y1 d�T 2E4 ! - �i S � - - ILt _ -[pY = 8 EE7i V n'1a , H. 1 ! a =� Y cj j�ee � p a Q e42 � �+a N 5p w M j�9a C€5a•` Na `e as ^n• -; s i$ H�F E� j� Ek E:� E• E88 0 � Y { 9 v p€ E :o �S! r a j C�9 `4 !- a j sa F, sy dia Naj, � a C 0 !! e :9 ja4 s ! ➢ m 9 j IMP Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Findings DeShazo Group Traffic. Transportation Planning. Parking. Design. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Michael Clark, P.E. Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. From: DeShazo Group, Inc. Date: April 24, 2014 Re: A Traffic Impact Analysis for Southlake Center, a Proposed Commercial Development in Southlake, Texas (DeShazo #13057) Introduction The services of DeShazo Group, Inc. were retained by Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. to conduct a Traffic Impact Analysis and Access Assessment for Southlake Center, a proposed commercial development located at the intersection of Dove Road and White Chapel Boulevard in Southlake, Texas (see Exhibit 1). The DeShazo Group is an engineering consulting firm providing licensed engineers skilled in the field of traffic & transportation engineering. This study will examine the potential traffic generated by the proposed development plan and will determine the general availability of access and roadway capacity available to serve it for the following scenarios: • Existing conditions (2013) • Project buildout (2015 - if needed) • Project buildout + 5 years (2020). The 2015 scenario will only be analyzed if the 2020 scenario is found to require mitigation. If the 2020 scenario provides acceptable levels of service without roadway improvements beyond those proposed as part of the project, it can be assumed that the 2015 scenario (which will reflect lower traffic volumes) will also provide acceptable levels of service. Once completed, this report will be provided to City of Southlake staff (Staff) and TxDOT for review and to fulfill the associated requirements of the local approval process. Proposed Development Characteristics This proposed development consists of approximately 200,000 square feet of commercial uses on the western tract and 69 single-family dwelling units on the eastern tract. The overall project is proposed to be fully developed by the end of 2015. Exhibit 2 offers a conceptual site plan and shows the roadway improvements included with the project including: 1) The construction of deceleration lanes on Dove at Kirkwood, on Kirkwood and the site driveways and on SH 114 at Drives 1 and 2, 2) the construction of a raised median on Dove at Drive 3 and 3) the completion of Kirkwood as a 4-lane, divided facility south of Dove. 400 South Houston Street, Suite 330 Dallas, Texas 75202 P. 214.748.6740 F. 214.748.7037 www.deshazogroup.com Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 3 Roadways and Accessibility The following existing roadways will provide primary (direct) access to the subject site and are included in the study area (refer to Exhibit 3 for Southlake's Mobility Plan): • Dove Road a 4-lane, divided roadway with additional turn lanes at major intersections between Kirkwood Boulevard and SH 114 and a 2-lane, undivided roadway east of Kirkwood Boulevard and West of SH 114. Shown as an A4D between Kirkwood Boulevard and SH 114 and an A2U east of Kirkwood Boulevard and West of SH 114 (with the possibility of an upgrade to an A4D if/when traffic volumes warrant). • White Chapel Boulevard a 2-lane, undivided roadway. Shown as an A41D between Dove Road and SH 114 and a C2U north of Dove Road. • SH 114 Frontage Roads o the northbound frontage road is a 4-lane, one-way roadway adjacent to the site and the southbound frontage road is a 3-lane, one-way roadway. • Kirkwood Boulevard a 4-lane, divided roadway north of Dove Road and east of White Chapel Boulevard. The portion of Kirkwood Boulevard between Dove Road and White Chapel Boulevard has not been constructed. The following intersections will also be included in the impact analysis: • Dove Road @ White Chapel Boulevard, • Dove Road @ Kirkwood Boulevard, • Dove Road @ the SH 114 frontage roads, • Dove Road @ 2 site driveways, • White Chapel Boulevard @ 2 site driveways and • SH 114 northbound frontage road @ 2 site driveways. Traffic Volumes The TIA presented in this report will analyze the operational conditions for the peak hours and study area as defined above using standardized analytical methodologies where applicable. It will examine current traffic conditions, future background traffic conditions, future traffic conditions with the proposed project fully developed and operational and a final scenario occurring 5 years after development is complete. Once current traffic information was collected, future background volumes were developed by applying an annual growth rate to the existing count data. Then, the traffic generated by the proposed development was projected using the standard four -step approach: Trip Generation, Mode Split, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment. By adding the site -generated traffic to the future background traffic, the resulting traffic impact to operational conditions may be assessed from which mitigation measures may be recommended. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour traffic volumes were collected in the study area in May and August of 2013. These volumes are shown in Exhibits 4 - 6. Detailed traffic counts can be found in the Appendix. poo; - Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 4 Future Background Traffic Volumes The standard procedure for determining the future background or non -site -related traffic involves several steps. The first is to determine an average annual growth rate for the roadways in the study area. The second is to determine a buildout or horizon year for the analysis. Finally, the existing traffic volumes are factored using the assumed annual growth rate for the selected number of growth years. For this project, we have assumed a horizon/buildout year of 2020 and that an average annual growth rate of 4% will occur each year for the next 7 years. Applying this factor to the existing traffic volumes yields the 2020 background volumes shown in Exhibits 7 - 9. Site -Related Traffic Volumes Trip Generation and Mode Split Trip generation for the Project was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (9' Edition). ITE Trip Generation is a compilation of actual traffic generation data by land use as collected over several decades by creditable sources across the country and it is accepted as the standard methodology to determine trip generation volumes for various land uses where sufficient data exists. Because there is no proposed connection between the commercial and residential developments, the development was analyzed as two separate traffic generators - one east of proposed Kirkwood and one west of proposed Kirkwood. No reductions were applied for internally captured trips (because the ITE Shopping Center land use code already reflects this characteristic) or pass -by trips (motorists who patronize the site, but who already pass through the study area during the peak periods). A summary of the site -related trips calculated for the proposed building program is provided in Table 1 which shows the net trips added by the proposed development. The appropriate ITE Trip Generation Manual-81 Edition excerpts are provided in the Appendix. Table 1 Southlake Center Trip Generation PM Peak Weekend Peak Land Use Quantity Daily LLAMPeak Hour Hour Traffic ut In I Out In I Out Eastern Tract 210—Single Family 69 DU 746 15 43 47 28 38 32 Western Tract 820 — Shopping Center 199,678 SF 8,526 119 73 457 495 712 658 944 — Gas Station 18 Pumps 3,034 112 107 125 125 125 125 Totals 12,306 246 223 629 648 750 690 Trip Distribution and Assignment Traffic generated by the proposed development at site buildout conditions was distributed and assigned to the study area roadway network using professional judgment to interpret the traffic orientation characteristics of existing traffic volumes in the study area and a technical understanding of the available roadway network. Exhibits 10 - 12 illustrate the approach and departure percentages assumed for site - generated traffic in this study. Traffic Volumes Determination of the traffic impact associated with the Project is measured by comparing the change in operational conditions before and after site -related traffic is added to the roadway system. This involves the development of traffic volumes that include both background and site -related traffic. The site -generated traffic was calculated by multiplying the trip generation values (from Table 1) by the corresponding traffic approach and departure orientations (Exhibits 10 - 12). The resulting peak -hour, site -generated traffic volumes of the Project are summarized in Exhibits 13 -15. Page 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 5 Future Background Plus Site Traffic Volumes Adding the new site -related traffic volumes from Exhibits 13 - 15 to the 2020 background traffic volumes shown in Exhibits 7 - 9 yields the total peak period traffic volumes at the Project buildout year shown Exhibits 16 - 18. Access Assessment The access assessment portion of this study will examine three major areas: 1) The spacing between the proposed driveways and adjacent driveways, 2) The spacing between proposed driveways and adjacent public street intersections and 3) The need for acceleration / deceleration lanes based on the projected turning movements at the proposed driveways. Access Point -to -Access Point Spacing The TxDOT Access Management Manual requires 305' between access points on a one-way facility with a posted speed limit of 40 mph as is the case on the SH 114 northbound frontage road in the area of the proposed development (see Appendix). The site plan (Exhibit 2) shows that: Driveway 1 is located approximately 475' from Driveway 2 and Driveway 2 is located approximately 425' from Dove Road Therefore, both distances exceed the minimum separation requirements. The City of Southlake controls the access spacing on both Dove Road White Chapel Boulevard and requires 250' between driveway centerlines and 200' between driveways and street intersections on an arterial. Applying these criteria to the proposed site plan (Exhibit 2), we find that: • Driveway 3 is over 400' from the SH 114 northbound frontage road, • Driveway 4 is approximately 300' from Driveway 3 and 230' from Kirkwood Boulevard, • Driveway 5 is approximately 400' from Dove Road and over 550' from Drive 6 and • Drive 7 is over 300' from Drive 6. Therefore, all distances exceed the minimum driveway separation requirements. Auxiliary Lane Assessment This portion of this study will examine the need for auxiliary or turn lanes based on the projected turning movements at the proposed access points. Both TxDOT and the City of Southlake require that auxiliary turn lanes be provided when the turning movements exceed 50 vehicles per hour for right turns on a roadway with a speed of 40 mph or less (see Appendix). Applying the volume threshold standard to the proposed site traffic (Exhibits 13 -15) shows that: 1) The projected right turn traffic volumes on the SH 114 northbound frontage road at Driveways 1 and 2 exceed the volume threshold for an auxiliary lane (both are shown on the site plan). 2) The projected eastbound right turn traffic volumes on Dove Road at Drive 3 exceed the volume threshold for an auxiliary lane. 3) The projected eastbound right turn traffic volumes on Dove Road at Kirkwood Boulevard exceed the volume threshold for an auxiliary lane (one is proposed and shown on the site plan). 4) The projected right turn traffic volumes on Kirkwood at Driveways 5 and 6 exceed the volume threshold for an auxiliary lane (both are shown on the site plan). Poge 4 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 6 Traffic Impact Analysis Analysis Methodology Traffic operational conditions for unsignalized and signalized roadway intersections are quantitatively measured in terms of average delay per vehicle in a one -hour period through the intersection as a function of roadway capacity and operational characteristics of the traffic signal. The standardized methodology applied herein was developed by the Transportation Research Board as presented in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). HCM also qualitatively rates the overall delay conditions in terms of "Level -of -Service" (LOS) ranging from "A" (free -flowing conditions) to "F" (over -capacity conditions). Generally, LOS D or better is considered an acceptable condition for intersections in urban and suburban areas. Summary of Results The intersection capacity analyses presented in this study were performed using the Synchro 8 software package. Table 2 provides a summary of the intersection operational conditions during the peak periods under the analysis conditions presented previously. Detailed software output is provided in the Appendix. The findings are as follows: Existing (2013) Conditions The following assumptions were included as part of the existing conditions analysis: • The traffic volumes collected in May and August of 2013 are representative of average daily traffic levels. As Table 2 indicates, all interchanges and intersections operate acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak periods with 2013 traffic volumes. In order to determine the feasibility of signalizing the Dove/Kirkwood intersection, a traffic signal warrant analysis has been conducted. This study found that existing volumes do not satisfy the warrant criteria. However, with the addition of seven years of background traffic growth and the retail traffic, the projected volumes satisfy one -hour, four-hour and eight -hour volume warrants. The detailed warrant analysis can be found in the Appendix. Future (2020) Background Conditions The following assumptions were included as part of the future background conditions analysis: • The traffic volumes collected in May and August of 2013 have been increased by 4% per year for seven years to reflect the normal growth in the study area and represent average daily traffic levels for the year 2020. As Table 2 indicates, 1) The SH 114/Dove Road interchange operates acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak periods with 2020 background traffic volumes. 2) The Kirkwood Boulevard / Dove Road intersection fails as an unsignalized operation during the AM peak. If this location is signalized, however, the levels of service will return to acceptable values. 3) The Dove Road/White Chapel roundabout fails during the AM and PM peak periods. If bypass lanes are added, the LOS does improve. In order to determine the feasibility of signalizing the Dove/Kirkwood intersection, a traffic signal warrant analysis has been conducted. This study found that existing volumes do not satisfy the warrant criteria. However, with the addition of seven years of background traffic growth and the retail traffic, the projected volumes satisfy one -hour, four-hour and eight -hour volume warrants. The detailed warrant analysis can be found in the Appendix. Future (2020)'Buildout Plus 5 Years' Conditions The following assumptions were included as part of the future background plus site conditions analysis: • The proposed project will be fully developed by the end of the year 2015 and Poge 5 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 7 Table 2 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Results 2013 2M IntereRien TmMc Sme-d Beh90rd♦1d I.toxment AM PM Weekend AM PM Weekend AM PM Weekend B (I47) B (112) B (I1.1) C (216) B (15.0) B (125) C (30.9) C (27-8) B (14 7) B (14.4) C (20.6) B (129) C (25.9) C (311) B (15.3) C (33-8) D (41.1) B (179) ALL A (42) A (6.0) A (2-8) A (9.0) A (18) A (2.9) F (53-1) F (16Q9) F (10D3) NBL F (1689) F Err F (9ELO) NBT F (900) F (51-6) D (33A) NBR C (232) C (15.6) B (147) Dove @ Kirkw , EBL A (9-2) A (81) A (76) B (10.5) A (86) A (7-8) 5 (lag) A (8.8) A (8.1) '.VBL A (94) A (8-9) A (8.2) SBL D (317) C (111) 6 (10.6; F (106.5) D (32-8) 6 (11.5) F (8779) F (13dZO) F (66.8) SBTR D (31.7) B (12.0) A (89) B (12.0) C (154) A (9.2) C (184) C (18.5) D (27.5) w/signd C (233) C (291) 8 (18.4) A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.0) ALL C (174 B /1l6) A (5-2) F (60.0) E (435) A (6.1) F (98.6) F AM-7) B (10.9) ES B (145) B (11A) A !'511 E (36.9) C (205) A (5.9) F (689) F (74.41 B (I15) w/EB aypm C (24.0) C (15.1) A (55) D (321) D (28.6) A (71) 'AS C (22.6) C (156) A (5.5) F (1045) E (45.8) A (6.6) F (164.8) F (159 7) 5 (11.5) Dove @ White Chapel w/ WH Byp- E 146.0) D (252) A (6.1) F (82-0) F (89-2) B (10.6) NB B (12.6) C (191) A (5.0) D (260) F (75.7) A (5.7) E (38.4) F (231.8) A (9.5) w/AM Byp- 6 (14.0) C (29-8) A (4.7) C (179) F (67-2) A (7-2) SB C (16-8) A (61) A (51) F (53.6) 6 (11.5) A (6.1) F (9£0) C (13-6) B 1105) w/58 Byp- C (139) A (&5) A (5.5) C (18-8) 8 (109) A (7-4) ALL A (19) A (.L6) A (23) A (u) A R0) A (2-5) A RN A /43) A (5-0) 1VBL C (151) 6 (13.7) 5 (110) C (20.7) C (17-4) 6 (12.3) D (254) D (281/ C (213) W. Te Chapel @ Kirkwood 'NBR A (99) 6 (101) A (9-2) B (10.6) B 009) A (9.5) B (212) B (13.1) B (118) SBL A (&0) A (80) A (76) A (81) A (d4) A (78) A (64) A (8.8) A (&3) ALL A (0.3) A (QB) A (1.7) SH IIA NBFR @ Drive 2 'NBR A (9.9) B (12.2) 6 (11-0) ALL A (0.5) A (1-2) A (3.2) SH 114 NBFR @ Drive 1 '.VBR A (100) 6 (13.2) 6 (121) ALL A (1-51 A (1-4) A (17) A (18) A (0.0) A (2.7) A (27) A (3.0) 115 .. (0.0) A (0.0) A P.0) A (aO) A (0.0) F (561) C (21.3) C (211) EBL A (4-3) A (0.0) B (10.6) A (aO) A 10.0) 5 (111) A 10.0) A (0.0) Owe @ Drive ' '.VBL A (0.01 A (0.0) A 10.0) A (aO) A (0.0) A (9.7) A (8.8) A (9.1) SBL B (10.1) A (0.0) B (10.9) A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.0) SBR A (QO) B (L.0) A (0.0) B (146) A (0.0) B (112) C (18.0) A (0.0) ALL A (1.6) A (25) A (1.4) Kirkwood a Drvee 5 EBL A (9.6) 8 (12.2) 5 112-3) ALL A (4.0) A (5-3) A (49) Kirkwood @ Drive 6 EBL A (98) A (9.7) A (9.9) ALL A (1.0) A 1") A (0.6) NBL E (414) E (46.3) C (20-2) Dove @ Drive S NBA 5 (132) C (15.9) 5 p") WBL A (9.0) A (99) A (6.3) ALL A (0.I) A (0-1) A (a.1) NBL A 113) A (8.1) A (8-0) Chapel P Drive y EBL C (17.6) C (20.0) B (140) EBR B (112) 6 (10.4) B (10.3) ALL A (0.1) A (a0) A fall NBL A 1-3.3) A (8.0) A (7.9) ..: 'x Chapel @ Ddve Lu EBL C (161) C (16.5) B (13.9) EBR 6 (11-2) 6 110.3) B (10.1) A 8. C A 6, F. Lv abflarv.ce Ed• wol .ntervcta+ opp• . Case No. ZA14-100 16. Sd E6. WS =.A&V1 SWI, Eazt-, YNs!Ca.r.0 cGG-o. _ n R = Lg t Tnmyn, .4y.�!Acfrootl: [:venting - Page Attachment C Page 8 The traffic volumes collected in May and August of 2013 have been increased by 4% per year for seven years to reflect the normal growth in the study area and represent average daily traffic levels for the year 2020. As Table 2 indicates, 1) The SH 114/Dove Road interchange operates acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak periods with 2020 background plus site traffic volumes. 2) The Kirkwood Boulevard/ Dove Road intersection fails as an unsignalized operation during the AM and PM peak periods. If this location is signalized, however, the levels of service will return to acceptable values. 3) The Dove Road/White Chapel roundabout fails during the AM and PM peak periods. Even if all 4 bypass lanes are added, the LOS does not improve. This single -lane roundabout will need to be widened to a multi -lane roundabout in the very near future and Dove Road may need to be widened to a 4-lane facility. Conclusions and Recommendations This report has examined the access and traffic impact of Southlake Center (a proposed Commercial development in Southlake, Texas) on the adjacent roadway system. The findings indicate the following: 1) All site driveways meet TxDOT and Southlake access spacing requirements, 2) Site Driveways #3 may require an auxiliary/ deceleration lane. 3) The intersection of Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard should be signalized when volumes satisfy the warrant criteria. In order to determine the feasibility of signalizing the Dove/Kirkwood intersection, a traffic signal warrant analysis has been conducted. This study found that existing volumes do not satisfy the warrant criteria. However, with the addition of seven years of background traffic growth and the retail traffic, the projected volumes satisfy one -hour, four-hour and eight -hour volume warrants. The detailed warrant analysis can be found in the Appendix. 4) Because one approach of the single -lane roundabout at Dove and White Chapel already fails during the AM peak period, this roundabout will need to be widened to a multi -lane roundabout in the very near future and Dove Road may need to be widened to a 4-lane facility. By-pass lanes may also be needed by 2020. NOTE: Recommendations for public improvements within the study area presented in this report reflect the opinion of DeShozo based solely upon technical analysis and professional judgment and are not intended to define, imply, or allocate funding sources nor required improvements. Applicable legal precedent indicates that the Owner of a Project should only be required to proportionately fund necessary infrastructure improvements that are directly attributable to implementation of the Project. Such requirements will depend upon the individual circumstances of each project that may be viewed differently by each particular agency/municipality. END OF MEMO Pope Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 9 7LVAC rincinEsinc September 12, 2014 Alex Ayala, P.E. City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 320 Southlake, Texas 76092 ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA Re: Southlake Town & Country Tia Review —August 2014 Revision - (Formerly Southlake Center) Dear Mrs. Ayala: Per your request, we have reviewed the traffic engineering study for the proposed Southlake Town & Country Development. The traffic engineering study reviewed was titled "Southlake Center" and was dated August 9, 2014 by the Deshazo Group. Our review comments are numbered for ease of reference and the numbering does not imply any ranking. We have divided our comments into two categories — Informational Comments are those that require no action by the city or the applicant. Action Comments are those that require a response or action by the City or applicant. We offer the following comments on the submitted traffic impact analysis. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS (REQUIRF NO ACTION BY CITY OR APPLICANT) 1. The proposed development contained in the site plan in the TIA is for the property that is bordered by SH 114 to the west, Dove Road to the north, and North White Chapel Boulevard to the east. The extension of Kirkwood Boulevard bisects the property. The site plan shows commercial development west of Kirkwood Boulevard and vacant land east of Kirkwood Boulevard. The site plan of the TIA indicates that the western portion of the development will contain a grocery store, retail, restaurant, bank, and related commercial uses. The approximate size of the western portion of the development is 204,343 square feet. Gas pumps are not included in the site plan exhibit. The TIA text indicates that the roadway improvements included with the project include the following: o Construction of deceleration lanes on Dove Road at Kirkwood Blvd and Drive 3, On Kirkwood at Drive 5 and Drive 6, and on SH 114 at Drives 1 and 2. o Construction of a raised median on Dove Road at Drive 3. This improvement was not shown on the site plan. o Construction of Kirkwood Boulevard as a 4 lane divided facility south of Dove Road to the project limits. 4. Based on the site traffic assignment the eastbound right turn movement into Driveway 4 does not exceed the City of Southlake threshold. No deceleration lane is shown to Driveway 4 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1660, Dallas, TX 75234 (972) 248-3006 office (972) 248-3855 fax I www.leeengineering.com Page 1 of 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 10 No pass -by or internal capture reductions were performed on the calculated trip totals. This is because the shopping center use was selected for the commercial site and includes internal capture affects already. This is a conservative methodology and we agree with performing the study in this fashion. 6. The TIA indicates that the project is projected to be complete in 2015. No 2015 analysis was presented. The study includes a Future (Buildout + 5 Year) analysis that includes background traffic grown at 4% annually from 2013 until 2020. In our original 2013 TIA reviews for this property we commented that we believe the first, southernmost, driveway on the frontage road, Drive 1, is too close to the freeway exit ramp. The spacing to the exit ramp does not appear to have changed. We still believe the site would be better served by moving the driveway further away from the exit ramp. Based on a comment response letter from previous reviews submittals, TOOT has conceptually approved this configuration though formal documentation of this approval has not been provided. 8. The TIA indicates that the White Chapel at Dove roundabout will operate at acceptable levels of service during the year 2020 under background traffic with the exception of the eastbound approach which is predicted to operate at level of service E. The eastbound level of service E operation is driven by the peak period related to the elementary school north of the site. With development traffic added to the intersection in the year 2020, the study indicates level of service E and F operation in the northbound and westbound directions during the PM peak hour. The study states that the intersection may warrant a northbound and/or westbound right -turn bypass lane. It is important to recognize that the roundabout analysis is highly dependent on the peak hour factor selected for use in the analysis. As volumes grow at a location typically the peaking characteristics level out across the peak hour instead of being concentrated in a single few minute period. Thus, the operation may be slightly better than predicted. The addition of right -turn by-pass lanes to the roundabout would only benefit traffic during the peak 15-30 minutes of the morning and evening peak hour, but would be unnecessary throughout the majority of the day. ACTION COMMENTS (REQUIRE RESPONSE OR ACTION BY CITY OR APPLICANT) Trip generation included in the report indicate that the site is predicted to generate 8,725 trips on a daily basis. This calculation was performed using the ITE Average rate for the shopping center land uses. When the regression equation is used to calculate the estimated daily trips the resulting value is 10,806 trips on a typical weekday. We have previously commented on this item: o "the revised trip generation table should use the equation for the daily trip calculation, resulting in higher predicted daily volumes over the day. These minor changes should be made and reflected in an updated record copy of the TIA for the City. They are not expected to impact the findings or conclusions of the study." Table 5 and Table 6 in the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis appear to contain significant errors. Table 5 is reported as containing the site traffic generated by the shopping center, however, the volumes shown in Table 5 for the Dove Road and Southbound Kirkwood approach are far too high to be site traffic only. Table 6 similarly has volumes that are far too high to be Site + Background based on the information and traffic volumes figures contained in the TIA. o Revise Table 5 and Table 6 with and update the signal warrant accordingly. LCC rmana:unC Case No. ZA14-100 Page 2 of 3 Attachment C Page 11 o Previously we had commented on the signal warrant that: "The signal warrant must be updated to reflect the correct trip generation and land use mixes from the current proposed development." 3. Table 7 in the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis indicates that the signal is not warranted by background traffic growth at the Kirkwood at Dove intersection in the year 2020 and that signalization results from the increase in traffic generated by the site. No 2015 opening day analysis is present that indicates if the signal is warranted at opening day. o Please assess if warrants are expected to be met on opening day. o Based on the warrant provided, the construction of the development results in the need for signalization at the Kirkwood and Dove intersection. Based on the analysis presented, the development should be responsible for the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Road. 4. Page one of the TIA text indicates that the development consists of approximately 200,000 square feet of commercial use on the western tract and 69 single family homes on the eastern tract. o No trip generation or traffic analysis was included for the traffic from the eastern tract. No site plan information related to development on the east side of Kirkwood Boulevard is included in the study. The traffic impact analysis should account for future development of the adjoining tract in some fashion. o Please revise the traffic impact analysis to include development planned for the eastern tract. ■ If no development is currently planned, please update the study to include traffic volumes generated by the maximum use and intensity allowable based on the future land use of the site. 5. The site plan included with the TIA did not contain a scale and driveway throat lengths were not clearly legible on the copy provided to LEE. Based on our visual review of the site plan, and capacity analysis results, the throat lengths appear to be satisfactory and variances, if necessary, should be allowable. Please include a clearly legible site plan, including scale, in future pdf submittals of this study. If you have any questions, please contact me at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services and are available to address any additional comments or concerns. Sincerely, John P. Denholm III, P.E., PTOE Lee Engineering TBPE Firm F-450 Ur: CncinErc:vine Case No. ZA14-100 Page 3 of 3 Attachment C Page 12 DeShazo Group Traffic. Tranngortation Planning. Parking. Design. Technical Memorandum To: Mike Clark — Winkelmann & Associates. Inc. From: Tom Simerly — DeShazo Group, Inc Date: November 13. 2014 Re: Traffic and Transportation Elements for Southlake Center on SH 114 at Dove Road in Southlake, Texas (DeShazo Pr*ctNo 13057) This memorandum is provided to address comments and is a follow-up to discussions held with the City staff. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared by DeShazo several months ago for the referenced commercial development. The purpose of the TIA was to determine the impact of the development and to make recommendations to mitigate any issues that might develop as a result of the development. For a grocery -anchored retail development. the PM peak hour would be the focus for the impact study. The TIA resulted in the following recommendations. 1) All site driveways meet TxDOT's and the City of Southlake's access spacing requirements. 2) Site driveways 91, #2, 45 and 46 will require auxiliary/deceleration lanes, all of which are shown on the site plan 3) The eastbound approach of the Dove RoadiKirkland Boulevard intersection will require an auxiliary/deceleration lane. which is also shown on the site plan 4) The Dove Road/Kirkland Boulevard intersection should be signalized when volumes satisfy the warrant criteria. In order to determine the feasibility of signalizing this intersection, a traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted. This study found that existing volumes do not satisfy the warrant criteria. However. with the addition of seven years' of background traffic growth and the retail traffic. the projected volumes satisfy one -hour, four-hour and eight -hour volume warrants. The detailed warrant analysis can be found in the Appendix. 5) Because one or more of the approaches to the single -lane roundabout at Dove Road and White Chapel will experience unacceptable delays in 2020, a northbound and/or westbound bypass lane may he warranted ac a racult of harkgrnrind traffic increase-,, not site traffic. The latest site plan also shows a deceleration lane at Driveway #3. Deceleration lanes are shown at all driveways except Driveway #4 and Driveway #7, which serves the back of the grocery store. A deceleration lane is also shown for the Dove RoadlKirkwood Boulevard intersection. There is some subjectivity on how to approach a TIA One of the choices that a traffic engineer has to consider concerns the method of calculating the trips generated by a site. There are two ways to calculate trips outlined in the ITE Trip Generation manual_ One method is to use an established average rate which produces trips per thousand square feet of development. The second is to use a Slr4ol, S—to 330 Do. 7exaa 75202 P. 214.149.6743 :. 21t. 748.7037 w..r, deeharoproup.c� Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 13 regression equation developed from a fitted curve using the historical data. which also produces the average rate per thousand square feet of development. For the purposes of this study, DeShazo used the average trips11,000 SF method for determining trips. The City's consultant has suggested revising the study using the regression equation. The regression equation method results in a 241A increase in daily traffic. It should be noted that "passby" trips were not considered in this study The ITE Trip Generation manual allows for a 35% reduction in net traffic based upon people who are already on the road and decide to stop at the grocery or other retailer (passby trip). This reduction was not taken. DeShazo considered the request with one question in mind What additional improvements might be required of the developer if the report were revised to reflect a 24% increase in traffic? The answer: The developer is currently providing all of the mitigation that could be requested: revising the report would not reveal any additional mitigation. The possible exception would be the timing of the need for signalization at the Dove Road/Kirkwood Boulevard intersection. The current study reports that background traffic plus site traffic in the year 2020 may meet three warrants outlined in the Marwal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Existing traffic (plus two years of 4% growth per year) for the projected Buildout of the site in 2015 plus our site traffic meets PM peak hour warrants The north leg (Verizon) drives this single peak -hour warrant. In consideration of the City's consultants recommendation to increase site traffic by 24%, a warrant analysis was conducted with the increase resulting in the intersection meeting only the PM peak hour warrant A single peak hour warrant is not considered sufficient to recommend installing a traffic signal at this time. It would be recommended that conduit and pull boxes be installed at appropriate locations in concert with the construction of Kirkwood Boulevard on the site to facilitate a signal when warranted in the future. Activity on the property to the east and south would trigger a reassessment of the signal An evaluation of the site traffic as a percentage of overall traffic results in a 36% site contribution to the intersection of Dove Road at Kirkwood Boulevard End of Memo SGX kecenref Tralfic aid Trimparami? k wu v .w, Page 2 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 14 DeShazo Group Traffic. Tranapor Ln L_cn Planning. Parking. Design. October 13, 2014 Mr. Mike Clark Winkelman & Associates, Inc. 6750 Hillcrest Plaza Drive, Suite 325 Dallas, TX 75230 RE: Proportionality of Southlake Center Traffic on Kirkwood Boulevard in Southlake, Texas (Project No.13057) Dear Mr. Clark: The DeShazo Group has been asked to determine the proportion of traffic generated by the Southlake Center to the capacity of Kirkwood Boulevard. Kirkwood Boulevard is a proposed four -lane, divided roadway that would serve the east side of the commercial site. Based upon the traffic impact analysis, the largest two-way traffic volume occurs during the weekend peak hour. During this peak hour, a projected 731 trips will use Kirkwood Boulevard. The North Central Texas Council of Governments has guidelines defining capacity for various classifications of roadways. Based upon the location and the cross section of Kirkwood Boulevard, it would be considered a suburban residential, minor arterial. NCTCOG's capacity for this facility is 900 vehicles per lane per hour. This four -lane, divided facility has an hourly capacity of 3,600 vehicles. Therefore, the Southlake Center's proportion of capacity would be 731/3,600, or 20.3 percent (20.3%). Sincerely, DeSHAZO GROUP, INC. Tom Simerly, P.E. President TJSJsk 00C South Houston Strout, Suit- 330 Uallas, iaxas 15202 P. 210-148.6740 F. 214.7s0. 7037 vvw.d.uSs zoprnup.aaa Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 15 2.22- it DrSh_p� Tang & Asschria&s. lrc. ROADWAY LINK$ (DerfvedNuf Ow Morth Central Texas CoWgcil of Covermrrmr g (NCTCOG) +rrodefitp8 yarnrr+etersj For roadway Links in this analysis, per -lane link capacities are defined as the values used in regional transportation mo4eling procedures by N(-7COG. Link capacity is a function of surrounding land d evetopnwnt characteristics (e.g„ eentraI business district, suburban, etc.) and the functiolLai cl;assiffcatiort of the roadway (e.g. arterial, local rtreet, etc_). A igununary of hourly and daily hnk capacities per lane is provided in the table immediately be-Iow. Oy ealc;dating the ratio of volume tp capacity far a roadway 1!'nk- LOS may be defined. Sssed upon guidelines established by XC77COG, LOS criteria are sumntariwd in the second table: Table A. Hourfy Roadway Link S'er Wce Voft+rrres (Per Lane) (f]Orived hum paramafer5 used by North Can&* Texas Councd of GavarrrmentS) AREA ROADWAY FUNMONAL CLASSIFICATION T1'i'li TTincfArterial Minor Arterial collector Local Frontage Road C5D 725 725 475 475 M () (650) Ws2 (425) (650) CUD Fringe 775 (725) 775 50D M5) (450) 501) (45Q 775 (725) Urban 850 62.5 525 525 85D Residential (775) (750) (475} {975) (750) Suburban 925 900 575 575 WO Residential {875j (') (525) (525) (825) Rural 1,025 975 60D 600 975 925 ( ) 876 ( ) (550) {550} (835) k4#4 - Divided or Onr Way 14PAd5 (h444) = Undivided Roads Tahfo B. Daily Roadway Lark Levef-of�Serviae Guidef+nes (derived from Para —faro used by htorfh Centraf rexas Council of GovernnVrXS) Volume/Capacity Level -of -Service Ratio x 50.65 Aj$fC 4,65 { x -� 1.00 D/E x > 1.00 F Traffic 7wx wf Ama4esie Appendix Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 16 A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ASSESSMENT FOR THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE ROAD AND KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Prepared for: wWinkelniann &Associates, Inc. Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. 6750 Hillcrest Plaza Suite 325 Dallas, Texas 75230 Prepared by: DeShazo Group Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3199 Engineers • Plonnels 400 South Houston Street Suite 330 • Union Station Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone:214-748-6740 Fax:214.748.7037 November 12, 2014 DeShazo #13057 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 17 DeShazo Group Traffic. Transportation Planning. Parking. Design. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Mike Clark, P.E. Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. From: DeShazo Group, Inc. Date: November 12, 2014 Re: Traffic Signal Warrant Assessment for the Intersection of Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard in Southlake, Texas (DeShazo #13057) Introduction The services of DeShazo Group, Inc. (DeShazo) were retained by Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. to conduct a Traffic Signal Warrant Assessment for the intersection of Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard in Southlake, Texas. DeShazo is an engineering consulting firm providing licensed engineers skilled in the field of traffic & transportation engineering. The subject intersection Is located on Dove Road approximately 1,000 feet east of the SH 114 northbound frontage road and 1,000 feet west of White Chapel Boulevard (see Exhibit 1). This intersection will also serve a proposed commercial development located south of Dove Road between SH 114 and White Chapel Boulevard (see Exhibit 2). This report will summarize the findings of the Traffic Signal Warrant Assessment in a request for approval of the installation of a traffic signal at the subject intersection. This report will be provided to the City of Southlake staff (Staff) for technical review to fulfill the associated requirements of the local approval process. Signal Warrant Assessment -Existing Conditions Traffic Signal Warrants The Texas MUTCU defines a series of traffic signal warrants to be used in the investigation of a traffic signal installation. These warrants are listed as follows (also see Appendix): Warrant 1- Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 2—Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 3—Peak Hour Warrant 5---School Crossing Warrant 6--Coordinated Signal System Warrant 7—Crash Experience Warrant 4—Pedestrian Volume Warrant 8—Roadway Network 400 South Houston Strout. Su-tc 330 Dallas, ioxas 75202 P. 214-149.6740 M .deshexoproup.com F. 214.748.7037 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 18 Existing Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes to be used in the signal warrant analyses include the sum of the approach volumes (i.e., traffic volumes entering the intersection) on the major street and the higher of the two minor street approach volumes. These volumes were taken from the manual and automated traffic counts collected in May and August of this year and are shown in Table 1(also see Appendix). If current traffic volumes do not satisfy the signal warrant criteria, traffic for the proposed development will be generated and added to the existing volumes for a'future scenario' analysis. Table 1 2013 Hourly Volumes Time start cove We L T R Kirkwood SO L T R cova 19 L T R Kirkwood NO L T R 6.00 AM 50 42 265 7�0 AM 336 141 523 8,00 AM 246 82 470 9 00 AM 94 57 248 10:00 AM 91 40 143 11:00 AM 96 107 ISO 12:00 PM 122 100 267 1:00 PM 113 54 231 2:00 PM 185 74 248 3.00 PM 236 110 215 4:00 P10 206 241 218 slooPM 227 362 280 6�OP10 23s 199 257 7:00PM 1" 8z lsl BUOPM 103 38 Ila 940 PM 77 21 83 10.00 PM 28 3 60 1110o PM 17 4 21 Right Turn Reductions The Texas MUTCO has provisions for different adjustments in the assessment of the traffic -volume -related warrants. for instance, right -turning vehicles may turn "right -on -red" at a traffic signal under the same conditions as turning right at an unsignalized, STOP -controlled intersection approach. At intersection approaches on the minor street where the ability to turn right is uninhibited due to the intersection geometry (e.g., an exclusive right -turn lane exists) or where a disproportionately high percentage of vehicles are turning right (Le., there is not a significant queue of vehicles turning left or traveling straight), then: "Engineering judgment should be used to determine what, if any, portion of the right -turn traffic is subtracted from the minor- street traffic count when evaluating the count against the above signal warrants." 1 Because the data collected was not described in terms of turning movements, no adjustments for right turns have been made. Warrant Analysis The warrant analysis is based on the following assumptions: e The subject intersection will be studied under existing volume conditions. The traffic volumes for this study were collected on a typical weekday in May and August of 2013 (see Appendix). If current traffic volumes do not satisfy the signal warrant criteria, traffic for the proposed development will be generated and added to the existing volumes for a'future scenario' analysis. a Integration of a traffic signal at the subject intersection shall be appropriately coordinated with surrounding, existing traffic signals where applicable. However, these considerations were not directly evaluated as a primary factor in the justification of the traffic signal installation. 1 TXMUTCD 2006- Sect. 4C.01 page 4C-1 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 19 • Based upon background knowledge of the subject intersections, the basis for this traffic signal warrant assessment is derived primarily from vehicular traffic volumes. The pedestrian activity and accident history warrants will only be examined if the volumetric warrants are not satisfied. • The remaining volume -related warrants (1, 2 and 3) are considered in this analysis. The results of the analysis for existing (2013) traffic volumes are summarized in Table 2 and detailed results are provided in Appendix. Table 2 Existing Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Results Weekday Warrant 1. F ishr Hour Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Warrant 2. Four Hour Vehicular Volume Not satisfied Warrant 3. Peak-HoutVehiculat Volume Not Satisfied The Texas MUTCD stipulates that a traffic signal control may be installed at the discretion of the authorized agency responsible for traffic control installation and maintenance provided that one or more of the published signal warrants are met. However, the existing volumes do not satisfy any of the volume -based warrants at the subject intersection. Signal Warrant Assessment -Future Conditions Future Traffic Volumes Table 4 illustrates the future background traffic volumes on Dove and Kirkwood assuming a 4%growth rate over a 7-year period. The traffic volumes to be used in the future signal warrant analyses include the sum of the approach volumes (i.e., traffic volumes entering the intersection) on the major street and the higher of the two minor street approach volumes. The volumes used for analysis include the existing traffic volumes and traffic volumes for the proposed development derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (9`h Edition). ITE Trip Generation is a compilation of actual traffic generation data by land use as collected over several decades by creditable sources across the country and it is accepted as the standard methodology to determine trip generation volumes for various land uses where sufficient data exists. it is assumed that the "mode split" characteristics inherent to the ITE trip rates will adequately reflect the mode choices associated with this development. Table 3 2020 Hourly Background Volumes Time Start I I L Dove WO T R 66 Kirkwood SS L T R 55 Dove i8 L T 349 6:00 AM 7:00AM 442 186 688 8:00 AM 324 108 619 9:OOAM 124 T5 326 10:00AM 120 53 Las 11:00 AM 126 141 208 1240 PM 161 132 351 1:00 PM 149 71 304 2:00 PM 243 97 326 340 PM 311 145 283 4=PM 270 317 287 sm PM 299 476 368 6310 PM 309 262 338 740 PM 190 108 199 8.'00 PM 136 so 155 9M PM 101 28 109 LOVOO PM 37 4 79 1140 PM 22 5 30 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 20 Table 4 summarizes the trip generation calculations for the proposed center. The appropriate excerpts from the ITE Trip Generation Manual•8" Edition are provided in the Appendix Table 4 Southlake Center Trio Generation AM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity Daily Total In out Traffic PM Peak Hour Weekend Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out 820-Shopping Center 204,300 8,725 1 196 122 74 967 464 503 1,391 723 668 rotols 8,723 1 1% 122 74 967 464 $03 1,391 723 668 In order to develop more than just these two hours of trip generation, the ITE manual offers information regarding the hourly, daily and monthly variation factors for shopping centers of various sizes. Exhibit 3 illustrates these factors as shown in the ITE Trip Generation manual (Sr' Edition). Using the factors shown in Table 1 of Exhibit 3, an additional 12 hours of traffic data for the shopping center was generated. Hourly tuming movements were then calculated for the Intersection by applying the trip orientation percentages shown in the OeShazo traffic study dated October 31, 2013 to the shopping center volumes (and assuming that these percentages remain the same all day). The traffic volumes associated with the proposed shopping center are shown in Table S. Table 6 shows the sum of the 2020 background traffic and the 2020 site traffic and it is this volume set which will be used for the future signal warrant analysis. Table 5 Hourly Shopping Center Traffic Using Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard Based on ITE Hourly Shopping Center Trip Rates Time Start t Dow We T R Kickwood S6 t T R Dove E9 t T R L IGrkwaod NB T R 6.00 AM 7:00 AM 33 12 12 7 18 16 4 16 800AM 900AM 10.00 AM 90 33 33 28 50 62 14 62 11-00 AM 90 33 33 37 s0 81 IB 81 12:00PM 90 33 33 36 s0 79 1H 79 1:ODPM 81 30 30 33 45 72 16 72 2:0D PM 106 39 39 34 59 75 17 75 3:00 PM 113 42 42 41 63 91 I1 91 4:OD P►A 114 42 4z 45 63 103 23 IOD 5:0D PM 125 46 46 so 70 111 25 111 GOD PM 87 32 32 36 48 80 18 g0 7:00 PM 64 24 24 23 35 s1 12 51 9:00 PM 49 18 16 19 27 41 9 41 9:0D PM I 22 8 8 8 12 17 4 17 10.00 PM 11:00 PM Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 21 cable 6 Hourly Total Traffic Using Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard Based on ITE Hourly Shopping Center Trip Rates Time Start L 6ovc W9 T __ R 1 66 Kirkwood SB l T R 1 ss 64 _TEB 349 R L IGrkwood NO T R 6-00 AM 7M AM 33 4S4 198 696 18 16 4 16 8:00 AM 324 108 619 9:00 AM 124 75 326 10:00 AM 90 153 86 217 So 62 14 62 11:00 AM 90 159 174 245 so 81 18 81 12:00 PM 90 194 165 387 50 79 IS 79 1:00 PM 81 179 101 337 45 72 16 72 2:c0 PM 106 Z83 137 360 59 75 17 7S 3:co PM 113 352 187 324 63 91 21 91 4:0OPM 114 312 3S9 332 63 300 23 100 S oPM 125 345 523 419 70 Ill 25 111 6CePM 87 342 294 374 48 80 18 80 700PM 64 213 131 222 35 sl 12 sl SMPM 49 1S4 68 174 27 41 9 41 9WPM 22 110 36 117 12 17 4 17 10.00 PM 37 4 79 LIMPI' 22 S 30 Right Turn Reductions The Texas MUTCO has provisions for different adjustments in the assessment of the traffic -volume -related warrants. For instance, right -turning vehicles may turn "right -on -red` at a traffic signal under the same conditions as turning right at an unsignalized, STOP -controlled intersection approach. At intersection approaches on the minor street where the ability to turn right is uninhibited due to the intersection geometry (e.g., an exclusive right -turn lane exists) or where a disproportionately high percentage of vehicles are turning right (i.e., there is not a significant queue of vehicles turning left or traveling straight), then: "Engineering judgment should be used to determine what, if any, portion of the right -turn traffic is subtracted from the minor- street traffic count when eyoluating the count against the above sign! worronts."2 In order to be consistent with the existing conditions analysis, no adjustments for right turns have been made. Warrant Analysis The warrant analysis is based on the following assumptions: • The traffic volumes for this study are composed of existing counts on Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard (May & August 2013 — see Appendix) and a portion of the ITE Trip Generation volumes for the proposed shopping center. • Integration of a traffic signal at the subject intersection shall be appropriately coordinated with surrounding, existing traffic signals where applicable. However, these considerations were not directty evaluated as a primary factor in the justification of the traffic signal installation. • Based upon background knowledge of the subject intersections, the basis for these traffic signal warrants is derived primarily from vehicular traffic volumes. The pedestrian activity and traffic accident history are typically only applicable traffic signal warrants in extreme or severe conditions. 7xrAUTCO 2006- Sect. 4C.01 page 4C-1 Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 22 Appendix A Traffic Signal Warrant Descriptions Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 23 Appendix B Traffic Count Data Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 24 Appendix C Traffic Signal Warrant Summary Case No. Attachment C ZA14-100 Page 25 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA14-100 Review No.: Three Project Name: Preliminary Plat for Southlake Center APPLICANT: Cencor Realty Services David Palmer 3102 Maple Ave., Ste. 500 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 954-0300 Fax: Date of Review: 10/31/2014 OWNER: Dove 114 Infinity, LLC Tim Brittan 1905 N. Pearson Ln. Westlake, TX 76262 Phone: (303) 825-0899 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/22/2014 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Daniel Cortez, AICP Principal Planner Phone: (817) 748-8070 Email: dcorteza-ci.southlake.tx.us Any comments noted in the Site Plan submittal (ZA14-099) must also be addressed if relevant to this preliminary plat. This may include comments from Tree Preservation, Public Works, Fire Department and Community Services. 2. All plats of property in the noise cone as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall provide the avigation easement note on the face of any plat intended to be filed in the County Plat Records. A portion of the property on Lot 1 of Block 2 has the 65'LDN Airport Overlay Zone. Please add this overlay line to Lot 1 of Block 2. Please also be aware that at the time a Final Plat is processed for this lot an Avigation Easement and Release will be required to be placed on the Final Plat for recording. Please contact staff is assistance is needed in identifying specific location of this overlay. 3. Ensure that the acreage shown on the Land Use table on sheet 2 is correct with the acreages shown on the face of the preliminary plat. Informational Comments Require and provide that all newly installed electric utility lines and wires that will be operated at nominal voltages, all telephone utility lines and wires, all cable television and other communication or utility lines and wires, and all terminals shall be installed, placed and constructed underground; and cable television, telephone, and electric transformer and primary switching gear may be pad mounted or placed underground. Unless provided otherwise, no earthwork, grading, utility, street or drainage improvement construction or any public or private improvements shall be allowed until the developer receives approval of a final plat and the City executes a developer's agreement with the developer. All preliminary plats shall substantially conform to the Site Plan approved in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended of the City. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-100 Page 1 A separate Final Plat application will need to be processed, approved and filed with the county prior to the issuance of any building permits for any of these lots. A Preliminary Plat shall expire two years from the date of approval. Said expiration date shall be extended one year from the latest date of filing a Final Plat on a portion of said Preliminary Plat in the County Plat Records. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to monitor the timing of the plat and the potential for expiration. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA14-100 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Southlake Town & Country ao 305 422 v F 400 09 2306 ❑ 2309 100 2-165 185 245 265 285 315 1o1J Soo 2300 Q 2301 ry,� 600 p O do 2 1° $ 2° z01 205 2121 2123 112 116 12 124 2"9 2115 2112 m 2111 1o1 105 log 2108 ENT W 104 O 120 21a4 304 0 1o0 7 112 03 1 3o5 ❑ N 204 206 212 216 30o �2092131oo E KIRKWO S� 1a g8 1 �o0 1 A < 1 Fn 1 A 1 D 1 Z Owner Zoning Address Acreage R-e�s 1• Mansoor, Shadan RPUD 2308 IDLEWILD CT 0.40 O 2• Kurtz, Brian L Etux Melissa RPUD 2309 IDLEWILD CT 0.45 NR 3• Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD 2301 KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.32 O 4• Bradford, Joseph III Etux S RPUD 409 STOCKTON DR 0.46 O 5. Owens, Andrew W Etux Elizabeth RPUD 401 STOCKTON DR 0.47 NR 6. Southlake, City Of CS 2300 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.88 NR 7. Kushwaha, Alok P RPUD 405 STOCKTON DR 0.59 O 8. Chokshi, Rupesh Etux Aparna Z RPUD 403 STOCKTON DR 0.49 O 9• Bollini, Sashidhar Etux Sesha RPUD 2304 IDLEWILD CT 0.37 O 10. Schultz, Todd R RPUD 2305 IDLEWILD CT 0.38 NR 11. Southlake, City Of SF1-A 2235 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.65 NR 12. Morales, Michael D RPUD 2300 IDLEWILD CT 0.38 NR 13. Eady, Linda L Etvir Connie D RPUD 2301 IDLEWILD CT 0.47 O 14. Southlake, City Of RPUD 150 W DOVE RD 0.44 NR 15. Southlake, City Of RPUD 2280 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.54 NR 16. Mullikin, Timothy D SF1-A 2225 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.15 NR 17. Neill, Rosemma & Kay V Gunn SF1-A 2201 SHADY OAKS DR 1.50 F 18. T Zero Partners Lp AG 2001 SHADY OAKS DR 5.64 F 19. Brentwood Residential Assoc SF30 2055 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.02 O 20. Shivers Family Partnership AG 1835 SHADY OAKS DR 21.53 O 21. Thrasher, Wesley A Etux Terrie AG 1975 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.18 NR 22. Gottimukkula, Sohini Etvir S RPUD 109 KEYSTONE DR 0.46 NR 23. Repice, Joseph A Etux Victoria RPUD 105 KEYSTONE DR 0.38 O 24. Verizon Wireless Texas Llc NRPUD 500 W DOVE RD 24.86 NR 25. Simpson, Charles Etux Kathleen SF30 104 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.68 O Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 1 26. Conley, Michael Etux Audrey SF30 100 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.74 O 27. Patel, Prabhudas KTr SF30 101 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.74 NR 28. Currie, John L & Deborah J SF30 105 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.87 O 29. Rodriguez, Joe III Etux Tanya RPUD 113 KEYSTONE DR 0.49 NR 30. Southlake, City Of ECZ 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.63 NR 31. Brown, Kenneth R Sr Etux C J SF1-A 2005 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.71 NR 32. Thrasher, Wesley Etux Terri AG 1965 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.85 NR 33. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD 101 KEYSTONE DR 0.30 NR 34. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD 100 KEYSTONE DR 0.58 NR 35. Southlake, City Of SP1 100 E DOVE RD 10.56 NR 36. Dove 114 Infinity Llc SP2 500 W SH 114 29.49 F 37. Shivers Family Ptnrship Ltd AG 1900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 39.54 O 38. Dove 114 Infinity Llc SP2 500 W SH 114 24.95 F F: In Favor Responses Received: O: Opposed To Seventeen (17) U: Undecided NR: No Response Multiple Responses have also been received from outside the 200-foot buffer that can be found under Attachment `E' of this report. The applicant also provided a petition of signatures to staff in support of the project. This petition will be provided to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council separately. City residents have also provided several additional property owner responses in opposition to the project in addition to a petition and information regarding the applicants petition. All these responses and information will be provided to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council separately. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Dove 114 Infinity Llc 1121 S Carroll Ave Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) . the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Names): z Must be property awner(s) whose nam (s) are Phone Number (optional): Date: Date: printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 3 Notification Response Farm ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM T Zero Partners Lp 13631 Ashridge Dr Dallas Tx 75240 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: -- DateW_/� Additional Signature: t Date; Printed Name(s): / VK/6 Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Phone Number (optional): Case No. ZA14-100 at top. atherv?tse contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Attachment E Page 4 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 V WROJAS 08M.7000ber. 9, 20U at 6..,3iq pg& IJA'1`11& I N001cation Response Um. larja, ek., Southlake, TX 76692 Southlake Tx 76092 Phone, (817)748-8621 Fax: (317)748_8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA KAY.L, FAx. OR kLqAXD UEUME-RY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby ir 'ravor oT I opposed'id-, unde6ded einout (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for conwen-jq regard?nq gout- posljion: `Cj".: t, ce' k -e 'J 4C 5b -��jo- Z7�� 0 (1-4vle oil re In"Le, Ir e- e; e.C3, �"z --I Signature: Date-, UCJ Addjtionai Qnafure: Date: lo Printed Narne(s): vir-ele. MU-0 be VClwrty owrer(s) w;)ose names) are printed at'op- Otherwise contact the €'iat Phone Number.(optional): Sel- 7 L5770 C�' One form per propei ty. Case No. Attachment E ZA1 4-100 Page 5 -_0/06{201d -5=51 18174913445 BRADFORD PAGE 81 Notification Response Foy Z414-1DID Meeting Date: October9, 2074 at 13:30 PM Bradford. Joseph III Etux S 409 Stockton Or Southiske Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DEL11Vr=RY 13FFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of apposed to undecided about (circ or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above - Space for cornments regarding your pasWon: � ignature- �' -- Bata. AdditionalSignature: _ Date:. Printed Name( ): ?1:7rfnl2twl�;'� Muai bd PMPOrty W0i4pF(F) Wt%Z namu(s) are printod ak tup. Qth9rV0&d Wnladlho Plan MN QaWnriwet. One form Per pmpartY. done Number (optional): Addy h �� . ; �;s 10a d AJIJ � � C of r Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 6 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Data: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Dhokshii, Rupesh Etux Aparna Z 403 Stockton or Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed t0 undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space For comments regarding your position: t#, . t op po e- 14 r-0 (_e 7 J _ Q Y - c,D ECG% cal I I e .r 4,— Y'0 I c) Y, �4 11 YU e r c s nu l-wni� A ire i t Signature; Date: Additional Signature. 1, tfj Date: 1 =- Printed Name(s): A& rr\ ,A a rt 4 !'.lust be properly owner(a) whose r*5) ere prinjed at top. Otheivase c:uritact the Planning department One form per property. Phone Number (optional): )5 r, 7 ^ ` Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 7 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Conley, Michael Etux Audrey 100 Brentwood Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above; are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: We were apposed to the original plan presented - 1 year ago. It appears the developer comple ely ignored all homeowner-,/residepts comments and a❑nrernsthis past year and it trying to push the same plan through again. We are 1=SPECiAL.EY OPPOSED to any major commercial development on the 31ock closest to White Chapel (Block 2). This is too close to our homes and Walnut Grove Elemcntary.School. The cityjust last %yrr-k installed a sidewalk along White Chapel from Brzntwaod to Estes Parkv!hich is aviesome (thank you!). We have already used it several times to walk our son to/from scho❑I at Walnut Grove. Please do got destroy this family atmosphere you have created in our area by allowing major retail with all the associated traffic it will: bring so close to ou. homes_ We had seen on interim plan several months ago that had residentW on Block 2 which voe really lined and thought was a step in the right direction. But we have since learned that this plan has been abandoned which is very cisappointing- Signatdf-0-0 — Additional Signature, Printed Names): �t ia�GAe- � %- A rOus: be property owner{s) whose names) are printed at top. 01herwi Date':'- 0. /,21I- Date: fd I Conle rtact the Pliar ing ❑epartment. One fcrT per property. Phone Number (optional): C<i?) QqO -YD � rn Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 8 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting pate: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc 1800 Preston Park Blvd Ste 101 Plano Tx 75093 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (::(:):PP05ed to decided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signs rE. Additional Signature: ,.1 a Date: Date: Printed Name(s): .AP,1e11o,,r Must he property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): F - t 1t-Ld Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 9 May nR 01. nr _:19a R1nk KLJ'1hLUAha, MP 6aps3117334 NDtiftation Response Form ZA14 -100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Kushwaha, Alok P 406 Stockton Dr Southlake Tx 76092 P.1 - - - - - DD� .:. ...... _.;�$......•-,:��..:,_.�;: �,_::: •:*.vim-, iW PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of �pposed undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: . T� ed V)o Signature- - Additional Signature - Printed Name(s)- Must he property owaer(s) whose rtame(s) are Phone Number (optional)_ top. Dfheiwise al Date: I Date: Plarsnirig Depmtrner,t. pne forth pus propo". Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 10 ZA14-100 Meeting date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Neill, Rosemma & Kay V Gunn 4812 Barkridge Trl Fart Worth Tx 76109 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposedto undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature. Y,-.� c` -c - — Date: Additional Signature: Date: a�- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 11 Notification Response Form 1 4-too Meeting date; October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Repice, Joseph A Etux Victoria 105 Keystone Dr Southlaka Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the proso noted above, are hereby in favcr of C—— -- opposed to und-ecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: - Dater f Additional Signature: Date; �1 Printed Nairne(s): OS" t�4rr Must he property nwrai(s) who a i7iwmeme(s) printed at bop. ❑Ihemir s con of the Plamiing Oeparbment. One form pur p apaq. Phone N umber (optional) - Case No. ZA14-100 Attachment E Page 12 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: OCtcber 9, 2014 at 6: 0 PM kiAi,A6 1 AD13r.eSW. Sou"ka Tx 76092 J� PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for cornment,s regarding your position: Signature: 4LicDate: o } NJ Additional Signature, Date: Printed Names): ti rr1ust F.e property OW!Ier{3) whasEb fWmefaj are prInled at tap. OlhenNIse cantarA the Plar,r;ng Deparhnent. On* form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 13 Notification' Response Form ZA14-1aQ Nht,--Wv IDaw., Cwh9w 9, 2Qi4 at 6:30 PM MA,"CL J $outJ7��rCi� 7x �606'2 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETEDFORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF 'TH115= SCHEDULED PUBLIC. HEARING, Bung the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby In favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or uriderline one) the proposed preliminary Plat referenced above. ,pace for comments regarding- your position .: r s1sz4 �S smut, E�l:r.Ji�:, t}i.v,ri.s, ,_ 14�r��cagE� up 'Y'wm' ign5ture. Additicnai Signature: Prince Nsme{a}: _. Mus1 be pmpEHly ovmer(g) milble narnl?QQ are Date: 9 LZ � { ;gip. ❑Chemise contact mLt Planning deRadmenF. One inrrn per propor�y. Pirrone fVr mb-er (optional): Y-! { 7 v q l & Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 14 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date- October 9, 2014 at 6:30 FM IJTLa * Aadrr )-W� 2 Southlake Tx TSai PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of <--QRPose.d t� u: decided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced: above. Space for comments regarding your position: �. dr-p" Signature: c r r , ^ Date: ID" Additional &gnatur Date:. ;, Printed Name(s): _A . r,, c ^ Mu5j to praperty owner(e) whose name(s) are prkftd at tcp- line Manning rep@r men;. Qfw form per RroRi�rtY- Phone Number (optional): q 2'Z` � _ fit') Case No. ZA14-100 Attachment E Page 15 Notification response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM South 12ke Tx 76092J- -- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Belino the owrler(s) of the property so noted abova, are hereby in favor of opposed to - undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, pare for comments regarding your position: V� P 4 Signature: �-` Date: Additional Signature- - Cute: .1 Printed lames); u7kt Do propa-ty o,vner(s) whosn, narrK al - kl�-Hrl are pri ntied as Wp. Otherwise conlsct the Planning one Number (optional): farm pet prop&V- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 16 10.912GA lA 14-1CC jpg Notification Response Form ZA 14-1 e0 Meeting DaW Q ber 9, 2414 at 6:30 PM +JA-nC- ADUt • -Swthlake Tx'T601- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(&) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of ropposed to undecided about (c� ct efte one) tY.e proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position.' t' -, 4.- k'-rf.1 i ) (-V. , I ,rr . . Tl,.,, , a�/�ei �i ,n..I,;,f Cx.r-e d A JLA IL_t4�0 N V r tA ��b J�Ol r � - isnature: Dale: Additional Signature: Date: ! I-~ Printed Name(s); NALim be prrrertv oRnar(fi) iv-asa name(a) ara;)dWiN, At lap, ❑Ibeew190 ccoftotlhu� Plarm ing Depm*mnt, One km par propom. Phone Number (optional): 41�C.dhltY.yo4gls�carJmelUu+4AVlnhax�id6Tiq�gyl yq�9�3?prajedorFi Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 17 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 Pull u�l�'r►�La 4 .qa eke -Ss: gouftake T1C 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETEID FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to) undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed. Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Additional Signature: Date: Printed NaMe(s); -- cLi?P— )ALM be praporty vver`er,$) whose naroo(s) are prig• W at tap- Otherwise 4ardct qua Nanning i]wWUT DM Orw tm per pr *- PhoneNurnber{optional}:sti- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 18 Notlfoation Response Form ZA"14-4 00 Meeting Data: October 9, 2014 at 6;3O Pali SaWhWW Tx 780g2 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS V1A MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARIN0. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline ono) Jhe proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. space for comments r?garding your position: S ��s I' 1 �, i.1 ? �� wmu Signature; a eur 51"t P40-Le— Date: _7 AdditionalSignature: Date: Printed Name(s): 1 0 0m- .__. fL_ �.1u*R be proporty olhmer(r) whose na me(e) GM P&Fhrd et tap- 0d%WNi%W WWI ft Phone !Number (optional): Depar4mena, Ore k= per Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 19 Notification Response Form ZA14.100 I41l efing Data: Oewber 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM A; t R4 I,Z. lug 93 Southiske Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the awner(s) of the property so noted above. are hereby in favor of PPas� ed� undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed PTeliminary Plat referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: �177�4- RL41 �z e �S Signature' - Data: Additional Signature; 'J Date:��� Printed Narn Mmrt sae praprty vwnw(G) hose �iama{s} am pri ted at top. ClthBlake mrUc die Plennfrva bapeftnent. prla fern per p-aperty. Phone Number (op#ional); Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 20 1 p-Qg- 1 d , 09 ' 7 7AY ; Fr— To : 81 7715W77 Notification Response Form ZA14400 U90MM Imo: OtWbW 9, 2M 4 at 6;30 PM mm %'141cJ �'fe'�d Sauttik" Tx 7GO92 6 nlM1V& Df#5F8�p 'Sdw PLrEASE PROVIDE 00IMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted alcove, are Merehy In favor of opposed t o undded about (circle pr underline one) t 7e pr0pos,ed Prellmina�y Plat referenced ahove- Space for comments regarding your pasltlon: 4"Ju r "ter y t04 Signature' 14 5 1 Additional Signature: L �� � T Bate- ICE- y -� v Printed Names)= � t)egal" � � c}� PCC -A' f �rkesitie praFerty rnunerts) whaso x� pIMIGeO �tAGp at191► a rq qx Ptanni Depaitll farm prrp=a* Phone Number {ophnnai}: Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 21 Notification Response Form ZA14.10D Meet!ng Cate, bier S, 2014 at 6:30 PU WArnt�d + .eDae -s: Sbuthlalte Tx i PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORUMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of #fie property so noted above, are hereby in favor of CopWsDedto €,rrdecided about �circGe or underline ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above_ Space for comments regarding your position: Signature; C� Date: 1 o L �1. Additional Signature: Date:? Printed Narne( )- • 4 Must tie prop" owner{%) %Nho s R name(s) am prhve at tap. One form por pmperty- Phone Number (optional): _, -1 Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 22 Notification Response Form ZA14-I D0 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM kA-VAE A fi1Pt2 55; outhlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR RAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of wed to j, undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: . � Date; r . Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s), dA. Cam'-'L- _ rapist be property awner(s) whGB10 name(a) are printed al top. Olhenwise oonlactthe Qtanning DeparbMant. One form per p,'vPery. Phone Number (optionali): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 23 Notification Response Form ZA14.100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM r : 5) C H#1�5lir � I Southlaki fx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Being the owner(s) of the pra er so rioted: above, are hereby in favor of apposed to undecided abort (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: '. 6 nit Signature: o = Date: UlAq Additional Signature. Date: Printed Narne(s): W,ust be properly ownrs{s) whose name(a) are prinled at iap- 01haroAse owtad the Planning Depg0rawt one form per prCP". Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 24 Notifica#ion Response Form ZA1+4.100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PWI I1JA 4N I ADb CkISS. � Sri,-�- k_�_a�_ Southlake Tx 75092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OFF HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC FEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above. are hefieby in favor of Q posed undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date:° Additional Signature: Date Printed Narme{s}: v� '�� "► Must he AropLmtY wane`(s) Wn4re -,ame(s are p+inted M tip. ❑thenuis9 cc ntac9 the Planning ❑eparlment One f= per PTapergr.. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 25 Notification Rssponse Form ZA14-100 Meeting l]a%: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PIN +ice.+: G-, s41 me 61toe Sauthiske Tx 75422 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the ownegsj of the property so noted above, are hereby In favor of op�dt undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for commerr#s regarding your positlow L Signature: � Date. AdditionalSignature'. _ Date: Prin#ed Name(s). fault nN prop" owne(s} Whoae name(s) are prtnled at 112p Other w se aw tact the Planning Deparhmig. One form per prop", Phone Number (optional): -- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 26 Notification Response Form, ZA14-100 Meeting bete_ October 9, 2014 at 6,30 PM South lake- Tx f6-DOE— PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being than owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of KOS ed'� undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Flat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1VV It hrfil. kN jV Signature: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name( ): hfust be a,Qp[)f, rnvr sj whale-har*s) ara printed at tap. Phone Cumber (optional): writact the Planrir g D"rkmarA lA VV is Date One form per property. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 27 Notification Response FDrm ZA14-100 Meeting Data: Dcteber 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM KLA"F i AV(sIZE-93: 163' Lr yew•#tta Southlake Tx 78092 � PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FOFXIS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVER BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor Of poseDto undecided about; (circle or underline one) the pmposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your posftlon: Dove Road, between S.H 114 and N- White Chapel Is not retail destination- The proposal lis not what th a area needs, is incoosisterlt with the surrounding area of h igh-ettd homes and not t he type of developme rrt that teas to be allowed wberr we made a major irnrestrne nt in a single family home i n o quiet area. We are totally opposed to this proposal- The pro pospri zoning change and site plan and the prelimin ary plat represent detreloprnent that is dropped in an area without adjoining retail- Acces_S to retail is not lacking in the area and thus this is not addressing a need. There are numerous grocery and specialtyretail estahlishmentswithin reasanahledistances- Again, we are totally opposed to this type of development In this area o15outhlelce- ignature: Date: AdditionalSignature- L4 & .. ..� Date, ro 1-s r Printed Name(s): —M*--/ &-. PLr bi-> DAAfor .� Nitia Ua proparly mnaWwhm names) are p&bad at tap. Ottmnw%9 concoct the flarnfng oeparhnent Ona form per property. Prone Number (optional): - 2V:y -s*7— ffoaatfiel t M-Ri >~' I E,a._TlRL I'A w,)IAxC' Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 28 Notification Response Form ZA14-SU0 Meeting pate- 0rt-abw % 2BIAnt 6.30 PM Southinke Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE CDIVIPL.E7ED FORMS VIA AVAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCNEOULrzD PUBLIC HEARING. Seingi the owner(s) of tho property so noted above, are hereby fn favor of y vp sed to undecided about (circle o!" underline one) the prnposed Preliminary flat refererood above. Space far corrmmen#t, regarding your poa+itlon: 4 � Signature: „ Cate: 6 Additional Signature: Date- Printed Name(s); -) muirt be pmrvdy waPr(a) -A02e nerae{rl w pNniod of 07fk O tlerMw cuMmt the PianflirnJ Sep riment. Ono kwm Per PropeNF- . Phone INumber {optional): _- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 29 Notification Response Form 7A14-100 Meeting Date. October 9, 2014 at 6.30 PM Ohl _1 7 D "uthlake Tx T6092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners} of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of op used to undecided about (6rcle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for commerce regarding your position: 12 Signature: Date; Additional Signature; Gate: _ Printed Narne(s): PAUst 4e pirjpart' Q►w oqs) whose ntuna(s)'are prin ttat iop. Cgmn%kacontact tl-.e Planning Deper mmll- One fOrm pOrPrORer*- 3411� Phone Number (optional): 9 - / .— Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 30 Tw 0 2 d$ 20144i)-M 11 34;541GMT7 FMFFr. Stephen R E111s Response m" -.:$►1"�.!•+44�¢h+r7_�'y�}!'- Wry l*`V '~ .k, !�'J:k�i'r'.e1�€'t, 1j�k�l�JIGS � - ;�k. `, r?�' y, � �s, _ ..�" � ;;•:�'; �M1�-4- "� -Nphen&SoelyaE11W- I. s� 2U49 V7 F#aad. Tx 713W •ti ._ - 4 F. i+'%�FIRP k J'47�! .11��!4.' 7.L;`f 1/k 7��•ti#711 I.iIG 7'M1,.` w,.ry �..'. wME IMMLED-PUBLIC HEAR ^+!�� r4?4 Y,!4 tinl7J.1 ' .l�A � m A4r ri W4 ly a #vrf Iminery -Plat WO wwd ..._, 7. for O.Maw" no 'Y4eunpewleMdUTE2 p[QA[Oe'[�a.g lr6bi*murlAy:byti r�beaslop-&A crfndachal rwEt MS IR Will 00 n61filWM b] l del'Ud Irons )WGF4311 fdM ard-GsElfttbm Of Sr>, 1 • ;',` :}- -'�.::'.. !a .a10eB nC# n69d �r7d i6� gr�'slara• as waa re. y- av�' _ . ' �. '. ... �. .. ' ..' `4,..'-,:,,'��.:•'-_' - - .-.. ,_ .� �"w-_�- ,'.� -Viggo NuT4 favor:ofil:,ANtwardAhla hpKmtsO?6reII16irOfi(y,burv�fA-anFIi�Itv41uR1�COFardIGOlIrd�6CY.11�9tNEplid.:`- ,. _'k �, eult. r7 S1J�5�e�ltla�ry IrSClE'85 ram%-,- ion Ifs this 6r19%J: If}(Ir�P�9�' r]Ur RtllQrlbiprhubd. vii T-nibbl hla%!h. EMB W.... '...... ,_-• 7rlU ke '�A 'cv+ner[s w,.W. .n0rnef�}efepiw.► laEfop 4.��" `�� — '�k ''��~ - "��� k:" ;� tip♦ ,....a.............................�_._.,i.-',._.,., t..n,,,_._—,.. _'_:i.. }i"'" +.,,,'^a,.•, ._._ _ vim..,..}_, ..,.., ,i .... .,i „ k_... ,.y. .._,. .............._._._.___.. �.. _.,,,..,,__.......a._......, Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 31 Notification Response Form ZA14.100 Watling Do*. 00Wbor 9, 2014 at G 30 PM 5au#hlake Tic 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Being the owner(s) o�� oted above, are herein in favor of opposed to ' undecided about a, a or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 10 ignature, Additionai Sighature, Printed dame(s): Must be pmporty owners) whaee rwnwdv) a•a pi inted at top. Phona Number (optional): Date. Date: I ra cgr4W tk Planning department. One fvrrr• Per Properly - Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 32 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Fleeting Date: October 8, 2014 at 8:30 PM Wtlrrn, fmDC ; Q F-aq6L 5 2 & Rp uW -HoJp- _ outhlake Tx 78092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORAMS V1A MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of c Deed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat refererkiz�ed above. Space for comments regardivig ycur paz�itioh: B •r j22v:L1tqArLyAxt t acldA � R, - U. Signature' Y, LkifD— Additional Signature: Printed Nanne(s): U L Fra D, PAList he property owmisj wmose naane(e) are -•:! a, top, C:Iherulse contact the Planreng Department. Phone Number (optional). Date: Una form per proO". i l I� Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 33 Notification Response Fora ZA14-100 Meeting Data: October 9, 2014 at 6.30 PM -- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OIL HAND I3ELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owrier(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed o Lindecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, space for com ments regarding your positiOln � W-e*'KUq AptovI) ' o R Slow- rT YJ � ���T- Z) - P0Q CC Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must W pmp" ownegs) whoae rrarm(s) are pFALF7d at sap. 0121,erMse conlaGi LhO Plsnn: np Dep "erk One I" per prgmty. Phone dumber (optional): N55� Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 34 111W1611IIFULILF11 NVW,2M14r1,7r-- 1 1/1 kkI 4.104yte ZA14.100 Meeting Date., October 0, 2014 at 6.30 PM -,t-tj j3vo�j jhtt Lki. Sauthlake 7x 76082 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAID, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING - Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of r' opposed to undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed PreHminary Plat referenced above. Space for coax ments regarding }our position: OVI R � � , � P se 14 �..� aJJ & G A I r1l d zu 4 f; r I F J-r A.L u i, E I env, r^r i h 1a 1 r d V at 5(. 401 on*cep / drvr} o�F firnes ! Signature: Additional Signature: Date: i vlIlq Date: Printed la e( ), Lq'SA Hei5-V ;a" Mun se property awf1er{n) whom nwa(a) are pklnlad attep. Cnhclwise omotan [he Planning DaparVrow #, Cn@ km per plgmM. 'hone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 35 I VM11F1 CLICZ"ti/1 J I7t- Jj LYt Ir70 1 VN ism ZA14-100 MeatIng Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM owthlake Tx 76092 rl$ilillll 'A Onvbfiap tl$_tl'd 4i. -NGbffpii Re W a.`•P h .tti'. �::�.�' ._ . PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEOULED PU13L.IC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property se noted above, are hereby in favor o op veal undecided abmit (circle or undedine one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above - Space for comments regarding your position: 6 xrl. 16-6,ovt Signature: LDate:`' Additional Signature, f -�.9uat he pIop&tcAVf:er(5} vApm- r:aenw(Q aee pJntPA at top. -{71t1arMM Mrttart thA Plamirrg Dep� Phone Number (optional): Case No. ZA14-100 Date: One farm per prop" - Attachment E Page 36 Notification Response Form 7-Al 4-100 Meeting Date: 0OWber 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Sauthlake Tx 76692 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS V1I.A MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVIE-RY BEFORE THE START' OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the ewrier(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underlline- one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: Date: Date: Printed Narne(s): ' Must 4e "Ep JJ Y cmmc.�S) vinoae 9amg{6} are �drirW at top. Otherwise c❑rr#act lfne Planning Deparierit. One form per property, Phone Number (optional). Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 37 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM outhlake Tx 78092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE TIME START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the properly so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (oircle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: 1�MA. �YW.f��C 1Y'►V 3e-4 Y 1'*�h�l�'171�Td ti 4L1�} f`1 �L�-'1�"i1 !, Signature: LL Fl a� Date: Additional ignat re: De: i Printed Narrie(s): . ; , �-k. • .. t x MuSI be property cwner(s) whose names) aro prim t tap. Olherniea tant2d t w Planning ❑apartm - One farm per praperty. Phone Number (optional): Lt lg - v Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 38 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 NwIng DwW. October 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM hfXme- 4 AD V,( ! i 7I Wr7 P4a*,! Cr. k14kA-1 c:� ��ociciclr 'FJ:-, Southlake Tat 75092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR KAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUSLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to; undecided about (cir�fd iir-randerline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Do [ rrt t C c x r7 of rb � P I P L+s f 6-e A,4e , G 7 ee2oS-wl Vy 6ov ('hie" e r,I, el U re2P-1et = E'► +7+ 141, pr- a armA , ;n, ao -e ate Additional Signature: 1w 1111e'Fxle t0 -Z!O f Panted Name(s): f°' crr7c� C'r r cf Must he propWy owtr-er;sr vrime name(e) are priinled ed lop. OpmwWa o ntw Uie PlanNng D"p meat, One iofm par property. Phone Number (optional): +7 V"? 40'i Z Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 39 Notification Response Foffn n• 2� ZA14-1 00 6Ar ! quv�, ba#t,- G mbar 9, 2W at 6-30 PAB. IJTt..'.rl cSIP r]CJC1+`.1 oN�fi.;"Ga, t.�lon; R: espoYse +J gn bA Southlake, TX76092 Soulhjake Tx M92 Prone; (817)748-8621 Far, (8 17)748-8(117 EFORE THE START OF T"s;E. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so cooled above, are hereby (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat refemneed above. Pace for comments regarding youir position: ell Signature: Date: IV - Additional ignure'. o Date:12 -!-14 Printed Names}: � a + ,Z id us; ;)e proporry pxvnegs) whose natma(c) are Ar*iteO at LOP. Olherwie p7nlwt the Plal g epa l nant One tam per property. Phone Nun, nal}: Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 40 ZA14-100 P9eeting Date: Octo bar 9, 2014 at 6.30 PM u�•rn� � �uae &04 South lake Tx 76092 - Direct' ei'Wa rsznd mail - pbnses ity,of SPiitti :Pla I�rxirr� �I$.L]elrelgjt�, �-�:i� S.' •_ ram'. ���-•��';':.. ,=... PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS V1A MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVrRY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBL G HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of apaed t undecided about (Circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space far comments regarding your position: 93 Signature: Date: ice. Additional Signature: Date - Printed Iarr7s}- _ PII List be pio, arty avrmer(s) whose name(s) are prinked at top.' Otherwise CDrrlac Phone Number (optional): to a War ing Dap2r1rrhani, Orw fonan per property. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 41 Notification Response Form ZA14-10D thl4eetin Date: October 01 at 6:30 PM �:N �b Southlake Tx 76092 i60 92 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the {property so noted above, are hereby in favor of ppvsed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your posl#ton: ILj ( `fl� Wf l } J i ii 64S } nature. Date: --- Additional Signature, Printed l ame(s): ,} N1us. bo property owner s) whoise names} are Phone Number (optional); Date. �t top. otharwlse contact the F leaning o"rtmern. One lam per poperty. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 42 Notification Response Form ZA14-1 DO Matiing Data: October 9, 2a14 at 6:3U PM INO —Di r Souttdake fx 76092 PLEASE PROM DE COMPLETED FORM VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVER` BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUSLIG HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of �ed unuecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: c3 011 f 1 �s ka n� Signature: CA4 wz3 Date; 10 7 1Y Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): LX -C4 r�l MLrg Le propeq wne,(s) u_noce as wn s) sre pdr Phone Number (optional): Date: Planning pop8l t QTW10M Pm!rPMPWW- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 43 Notification Response Farm ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 0, 2014 at 6.30 PM uyt" iC- A Ao bZk5%; v mv- Cc � r _ t- SouthlAke Tx� 762 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELEVF-RY BEFORE. THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the ro er�y so noted above, are hereby in favor of o_osed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature; Z, { ; , A Additional Signature: Printed Names}: , { Must be property owner(s) whose mma(s) are Phone Number (optional): Date. .. Date: estop. OthermsecadELgtth&RanningDeporkmrt. Cneform per prapcity- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 44 1%sl9F1L%,,YailVlt Y►G iVYioc I Willi ZA14�100 *wring Date., Octcfor 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM ' South ke Tx76092 4:r Solt€9rlak$ € LEA E PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DEUVE Y BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so rioted abDve, are hereby in favor of pPosad to undecided about (circte or underline ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comrnarits regarding your position: k Additional Signature: - rn - — Date: Printed Narne(s). f Ck \,. j (— - - V Must h a property ownnr,$) wM�& tie sj are pdnW i3t top- CVendo?e eontad hhe Plwmkug vbTwnt. Ors f0m pw p -0- Phone Number (optjonal): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 45 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 At 6130 lM Pj?fr Nr- -j AD hf f- - %MV. fx 7�002 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVER BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEAPJNG. Being the awrier(s) of the property so noted labove, are hereby in favor of (opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed PT-efirninary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: to � igrrature: Date: ` Additional igratue; Date: lc r Printed Name(s): - { N1 ust be property cv..mr0) IA16!�= nwniRe are Pi I led at tap O'henuiso coillLv the FllanniV Oepukunk One form per POP". Phone Number (optional)' Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 46 Notiflcatlon Response Fora ZA14-100 Meeting D@te: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM &ul Y6X PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORM S VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above. are hereby in fmmr Qf oppnsed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position'. Additional Signature: P`inted Namer( ): fi s b- � � y,ust he property+ Qwt4gvi) rig &5 rnsn*95 are prinlad at tap. Phone Number (optional); 1 — R —.a _ Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 47 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Da#rtyehi p October 9. 2014 at 5-30 P aa"} * • r r—qR1rj,) 40� Southlake 7x 76692 'y n1€fl#�Q.r� •�7,4-=Z!`tq`��}`! :'-y..5. 'M1 -.. �f+ti Y� __��� PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULE] PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property sc noted above, are hereby in favor cf opposed to undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above_ Space for comments regarding your position: F xs P, pn uF_ Signature: Additional SWature: Date. Ho f Date'. Printed Name(s): o . MLrabt prup" awnER(S) W hose namg(s} are printed al iap. ❑Ihenv7se Cni)Lact sfre Pfanr=,)g D&Da!tment ons faT, par lrupurty Phone Number (optional): _. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 48 101aW2814 99: 22 2148558200 M RTOMPXGEFLIL9R1Q�T PAM K/81 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Webnq Diu. o/beyE�9. 2014J' ate. 3U Fm SouEn a Tx fair 6 - -- PLEASE PROVIDE OMPL,E D FO'RMS WA MAIL, FAX 4R HAND I)ELI11ER1r BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PU13LJC HEARING, Being the CWPP5r 1a) of the rty so noted above, are hereby in favor of pp ssed to ur dmided ahaut (01WO Or 4Anderifoc one) the proposed Preliminary Flat referenced above. SPace fnr commenft regarding your poaloon; is Signature; _ Date: Ak c Addf jonalSignature.- � Date, Printed Names);— M"I Ge pro ORY a1w M81 whose rm%4-t) ve �rirtred �t+r y ()t?� Oxu 4 nnic man n.n iF. One form perpra y, Phone 'Number {optional}: -Sal Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 49 Notification Response Form ZA14-10 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PII ►,a e a � o tom: _ 4-VaiVfc2 southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner{s) of the property so anted above, are hereby in favor of op�o undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: W, gnatu Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): -I i) I �- Must b-a property owner(5) vntiase nama(a) are printed at tap- Phone Number (optional): Case No. ZA14-100 ooetiiect the Planning DeparPrOM. Date: per p:4peity. Attachment E Page 50 1711 LIIIV-1ML1Li1I I%U0jJW1 NOW I y1111 ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM We� ¢e: A outhla ke fix 76092 — Gi* -South so cgs -Re, ls+.YT.Q: '' •?�-rSF, :,al.•�.e PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of oppase3Tt ; undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above - Space for comments regarding your position: Nr, 'iC_ LJ Signature: Date; 1-'1-1 Additional Signature. Date: Printed Narne(s); 7oL�o , �; { Mist be p-aGerty pwr:E 1(2) whose narna(e) am pi irlted A top. Ot erwige DOMWl the Ptarl ling DFLpartrrient. Ona fa, in per property. Phone Number (optional)= `2 L'� 114 qq� I Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 51 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM ,tltcv4" �- Southla 78492 PLEASE PROVTDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OFF HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PU13LIO HEARING, Being the owner(s) Cthso noted above, are hereby in fa►ror cf undeoided about (e ons) the proposed Prellminwy Plat referenced above - Space for comments regarding your position' - Signature: k Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): •� Must pe property M-Ur(a) yajose rkqrre(s) ars printe:i at tap. Olhermt* Phone Number (optional): Date: zb 0 Date; Dsparhngrt#. One fnmf Per propwt- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 52 s3VLIltLP41vlI VLF,= %01t.-Zo I WE lid ZA14-100 Meeting Date_ October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM �ft�J Ki{.t' South Tx 78092 .. Y�.h-�' 16, L.st-siC ,,�: _ •.w•r. b+,, _a. _ _ - - PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING - Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above_ are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Prellmlinary Plat referenced above - Space for comments regarding your position: jk") &AW(O V.)) Signature: E)2te: _ Additional Signature: Date; Printed Name(s): , i .; M.-ibt be property owners) whose rname(s) are printed hl top- OthefAsi@ 4 Phone Number (optional): Case No. ZA14-100 the Planning Department. One form per pmparly. Attachment E Page 53 1#1J111r9,CALM -+11 1 %09619 ZA t 4-100 MeeUng DaW October 912D14 at 6.30 PM r� ,A(,G.c, t Te_�,IC o,r j AL, ouE1 ke Tx 76092 hB 33 1137ll aate��}} Ii.rY CF61i .. .:_ any. "�:/':; u,.t.�'Ji'r.'• , `'�-S•youthlakoTX 7 y� PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF TKE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners) of the Property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed #a undecided about (ojrlk or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: r- j, r,C�+ e-f- ,--. 11 1 r11 over rI �on .r a e �t - signature: ` r I [ Date: A ! L� Additional Signature: c 4. Date'. Printed Name(s): ri n. c ►� } ! a(-4 fret h4:ist+je property avner(rj+ihrmA ryamA(s) sre printed aEtop. fteiw cnrrtactthe Pjannlrwg Dapartmont. One Farm per proPedY- Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 54 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 5:30 PM 0AI" Southlake 'ix 7092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIAk MAIL, FAX OR HAND 1381LI E.RY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of ti10 sa noted above. are hereby iri favor of �0pposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: L) M. 0 ��. q r o ce- v,,-i G.-N rt-5 C4 d-e- 5 r- r I�rl�tu �, Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Names)' 1�0 Y+ 4 �A \w 0 �— Must be nrqpuM oavnar(s) wthm nme(s) are printed at top. Olhgrwlsa wrAaa ha Planning f:e-�afhne-7t. Ono farm pEi proper}'. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 55 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Me*gng Date: October 14 at 6:30 PICA Sou W 'rx Aso PLEASE PROVIIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the o rrer(s) of the progert so noted above, are hereby in favor of COP posed to ��ndeoided about ��. (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your po;si#ion: Additional Signature, Date: Printed Narne(s): Ily I}++ P.9ust bQ p upoi ty CA%r or(s) tpy,9o5e -jame(a� a pdnied at tap_ Otherwise Qnntaa2 tite Planning Nvedmani. Ono farm per prop". Phone Number (optional). Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 56 Do] 061405:14p CORINTHIAN Notification Response Form Z A14-100 Meeting date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 FYI u.q,m p � Az r ;. SodV"ke Tx 76092 _ B147420097 p,1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED POPBS VIA MAIL, PAX DR HAND DELNERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING - Being the owrwer(s) of the=�dl noted alone, are hereby in favor of vppundecided abaft (circle or underline one) the proposed liminary Plat refetencsd above. Space for commonts regarding your position: igr Additions( 3ii na ure: Printed fwame(s)' - T NIU4,. 9e p opeTly Uwrevn s] wioss -is flos] ire pFLn Fed at tup. Phone Number (optional)' Date; Z/ Date: Inc 101M WFP0P5FtY- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 57 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date., October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM h_.ifirme 4 A,"b _ ,D& 1fj Igo u v► d ] 1011 bU..7 La-.v► e— Scuthlake Tx 78092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space far comments regarding your position: SiSt-5 d�vclb n►e lLk i {l vt vt kYu�* ;r '� I✓64'C. OctG� La -'1. " Is io�-A&� L.L W l #'" i.lp- opc vtc r� o S�ti 2,r -s ac 1 �s . 1c < - avz, vlr� �+ u ktivx�x. 13 +racx t glzsYzs 5acrll� lrc a.,kkt-Ki-, CLAACr[dv, 111 ;nrua. .+i.a tc4r�'u'taca ry u� wc_. Lind -Up w 'i tk AAAOI'Lk ' e a c1 ed kit UtK 5 five . �,1 i �, CAI t ' ►'4 '� lM.� nti �cl. c�-� Vc 5idW,t-+ j "crdL 6vi� [5 v%a� ct �x�tLt�LL Cre U07a{ e, l iy�u j f i5 4 -w vial vkawi Signature: .} Date: 1615l2,DIL} Additional Signature. ]ate: Printed Name(s): l-r.6 &V1' tti+nwze M ust be praporty awmcr(s) wrio9a narne(s) are printed at top. 01h®r se owtart the Planning Department. Une form perFF operty. Prone Number (optional): -611- 4'11 -)LP-1 Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 58 I■vii l TV4041 wo 1 5xG3F %rlh %.+e■•• ZA'14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM �e� slpoeE-==ti: Southlake Tx 75092 - 'Direct:que-tiqjvs:and :t 76, -ho. �• Div PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (apposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature, Date' Addition • r atujw, Date: Printed Nam.e(s}: er n' e;-(- r �`l l _ -- klm;t uo pro perty� owners] whose riame(s) ara printnd Ht top. O[hcr:u� c:,rrtact the Planning Depa nt. Ong form per 15-,-30 4p. Phone Number (optional). - Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 59 Notification Response Form ZA1 4-100 Meeting Data; October 9, 2014 at 6,30 PM z _. sbLA ake Txx PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THe SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners) of the e�o noted move, are hereby in favor of opp� o undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed PFeliminary Flat referenced above, Space for comments r/egfarding your position: If f e fA z3,yi J 1"r�i A 1., _1�1 �fli r i nature: Date: Additional Signature; { Date'�6 Printed lame(): rUl h,1uaY fae prop" iwm*r o wt» . nernXga aria Pcinted Atop, Othemviss canlactthe PizAnog napaitnem. Ong form per property, Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 60 Notification Response Form ZA14.100 Nkeeiing Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PRI r#A"Ld i "bit , PAT 9 iC K c8i 06-P a 16 51- KT-0 f-1 � v outhl2ke Tx70k PLEAS'E PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PLIBLiC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of oppo uMecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed preliminary Plat referenced above_ Space for comments regarding your position: L R C/Al an ve, hvlym� I ritUCy Date. r1 I AdditionalSignature: , f =� Date. Printed Name(s): C ' l — Must be prcportV c+ner(s) whets rm*a) are prinw situp, 0 herw m awlecohe Planning Dapardnent CM foam per properly. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 61 Notification Response Fora ZA 14-I Do Meeting Date. October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM i� � spa o e,t-Src: South lake Tx 78092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, rAX OR HAND pELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the }proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding yosarpvsition: bWLJ-.' �4Xx b,,uelo or lz&ke-4 Add. .2t;e t"'I (Am� signature- ri Date: A I AdditionalSignature: �� Dates t-f%4 Printed Name( ), ?ept f � ?uljjm be pfapoity Gwnar(s) virios= games) are prir Phone Number (Dptional): Case No. ZA14-100 top, Otherviw oankact the Planning oapartment_ un6 Tenn Per prupenu- Attachment E Page 62 Notification Response a Form ZA 14-9 00 Meeting date, October 9, 2014 at 6.,30 PM Y- r'e jj () fwlarl lan( 6 Southleke Tic �602 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC KEARIN . Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (opposed�lo undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, Space for corn ments regarding your position: YY1.Yti'1 f (-', Signature: n o Date: Additional Signature: k&bftPq\- Date: IL.. Printed ame(a}: XA,' -v x I : w . l 414Lisl be property owner{3) whose names) are printed at tap_ Phone Number (optional), Other* so an ritact the PlarMing dapatrnant one form per property. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 63 It1l LIlltP0tr%Xmm ■t VL#m1-M1W 1 adr1i1i ZA14-100 M+ve'ing Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Sotjjh- ke fx 76M 1;!'Ibo OL- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA EMAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owvner(s) of the.- pmparty so noted above, are hereby in favor of C posed.to undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position; W Lam- SS Cost .4�, --- y- ignatu : m - Date: �I Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s). I Y K 0 Muv be ryope_riy wjrvggS) whose names) are printed at top. OthaWse oiwM 7t the PI ar4ft Qep drnent One fi0 m P2q. Proporty. Phone Number (optional): � ^ `333.� Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 64 Notification Response Form ZA1 d-1 a6 Meeting date. October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM WfCMF -f AUb�E56: N&kkA {es f E vvr> x 5outhiake Tx 7609 �rjy�y1?BIII;.f@SQ#`. *Wbo r .> PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of Copposed to undecided about (circle or undehine one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: W d/ f 10 ! 1 lr lkvv -. 14 +[ �hc J44 G.n& fy-s a fl Cr-&-G3h lm E �-' G (.es eme; � ��s Signature: f Date: I0 Irv] 7- 6 �16~1 lai sled Addii oonal Si nat€are: Date: _ ,Q Printed Names): a � � -"i� Must be p,aperty ovinAr(s) whose ame(s} are printed at ton. Otherwise contact lh- la i p �e�.yll�rtt, Ong farp�r 12 1 "7or �� r Prone Number (optional): 3,5 / - a z�;- fujtic{ o� 'J ll ��i st�s�a�., t3�csl�wt�a�� � �� ti ti ►�� �Ic. , l �c� Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 65 0v4 „J', 2014 02:04 PM Mdnhar Patel 9728521646 VALE. 11 1 Nollf edon Response Form ZAI&IOO Meeting Vete: October 0, 2014 at 6.30 PM 8ouddake Tx TOM — PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DIE LIVERY BEFORE THE STAR' OF THE SCHEDULED PUSLIC HEARING- "rng the awner(s) of the property so noW above, are hereby in favor of oppose to 4nc9 about (oracle or unded ane) the proposed Preliftnary Plat referenced obo►re. Space for emments regard#ng your poaftrw. Signature:._ ,a?—, _ fake: o -. Additional Signature: � Date; _. Printed Name(s), foot be property (F-flefW %WNCO mo*o)"pdmbw AttoR. Od krry corfhkiA1�m Ptarwhg Depertmwst ❑rw 3uir;: Farr pw"ny. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 66 Notification Response Form ZA'14-100 Meeting le: October 9, 2014 at 6.30 1 �a ZouthlLskLe Tic 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF TKE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Beirng the owner(s) of the property so noted abova, are hereby in favor of opposed to� undecided about 6-06 or underime ore] the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above - Space for comments regarding your position: ignatu Additional Signature: Printed Narne(s): Must be prapeq oumer{a} whose } - r �( - G , k are printed at lop. Olharwfw o ntect the Plarxling Phor)e Number (optional): Date: 1 4 Date: One form per properly. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 67 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 5:30 PM 0 $ 4 s1v4ts5: _LW) lain Southlake x 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in flavor of - opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position_ uc al 2Ci A&S �c;5 uu £ Date: Signature: r Additional Signature: Printed Names): din Must be property oviner(s) whose nama(s) are printed at top. Phone Number (optional): Date: contaot the Planning Department One farm per property. �02-'�Z_3i0-YgN Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 68 Notification response Form ZA9 4-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Jmqi South Iake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of �Rsed to uncle ided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for commenft regarding your position: Signature; Date: ` � r Additional Signature: Printed Narne(s): I t (' 'A-st he F51 upeity ownagr,) ivh Dse� names) are prinW at tap. Phone !Number (optional): Date: "-y- Mherwiee cwiaarhe Planning Departmant, or..e fora prr properly. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 69 I Tk1111 11..91Llvl r Ilk oo fj z 1.-#0 9 LJI I II ZA14-100 Meeting Date. October 9, 2014 at 6.30 PM KOA-Me- d A-be--Esrl southiake 7x 76092 � vW.,!t:77 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, PAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in flavor of <Eit undecided about (circle or underline once) the proposed Preliminary Flat referenced above - Space for comments regarding youf position: T" nj r Signature: Additional Signature: Date,, Date: 4., Printed Narne(s): L 1 &L- -�ius# be. propoi'y yarer(s) whoso riamg(s) are 11WT toP. CYIILeIV contact 0a Pta whg NpBrbmprrt. QnB frnrn per prop". Phone Number (optional): _ 0 - ti2 ff- CFO S -- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 70 Notification Response Form ZA14 100 Mwetirtg [fete. O+C ober 9, 2014 at 5;30 PEA YA9nAd' Y AC-vjt 15ft1 S uiiiake Tx 7092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFDRE THE STAR`" OF THIS SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the own(s) of the property so noted above, are, hereby in favor at (o�ppiormdunriecided about (circle or underline ona) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space €or comments regard1ng your position: Signature; Additional Sig Date: ,o a rye Date: Printed Name(s)� - Must 6o Pwpor4f =W(s) wna&e rgMnn(6j W6 I]ntWd stop, One fairn p� property. Rhone Number (oPtiortalj. T2!T9 2��d INSTI-75 1401kEZL89 WE0;T1 KV/SeAT Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 71 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date., October 9, 2014 at 6.30 PM Southiake Tx f00 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULE❑ PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the Property so noted above, are hereby iri favor of QtppasDedtin undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 0 Signature: Date: t Additional Signature: Date: Printed Names): i `3 h1u5t bE property awnpgaj whose nerne(sJ are prFntcd at :op. Okher.'Ase contad the Plennigg DeGartment. One farm per property. � �r Phone Number* (optional): � E Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 72 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM SouthlakeTx 7 —� PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HARD DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the ro erty so noted above, are hereby in favor of Copp'ose)do undecided about (circle at underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Cia q 7lF�r � wr. � r� G>rl5 i+'J( O ae-e- rjLe- tjs [+ya LOP V �,� � anew sue} '6d Wit G ear1 q r)rtr.6 k eau� oku . ! r n ■ F e►u + rJ� [_ . . Signature: Additional Signature: Date: la - -3- i � Date: Printed Names}: Rrl�st �e prop�rry owner{s) whose rram�(s) era printed attc;p, Oth arise contact °he Fanning Qapartm--nt. One form per pmperty- Phone Number (optional): S r-? - Yro - 2 7 oc, Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 73 Notification Response Farm ZA14.-100 Meadng Date: October 8, 2014 at 6:30 Pali ' �M'� l $aut;�fake Tx 7BOI�Z PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING_ Being the owner(s) of #*.pmperty so noted above, are hereby in favor of 1. 'opposed � undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: MVWM r dE a r/fe114'A c C; f rC ti_n. � f 'S{�.�� , .n r� rn .✓5 ! [r,�..-c f I4'I:J,' f cc�F � G'.� ��c>.I '%�j + �,4���rr"f�.•�� r =i!—Y. UiY6�' G A'� fr !T J✓_ /ifJ l`+ L1 C�� f��F•` Signature: - Date: . Additional Signature- Date: -- Printed Names}: Must uti property ownar(s) whose nerna(s) aTQ pritlted at ton. Otherwise c❑ntad the PlariOng ❑epartmant. One farm per property. Phone Number (optional). 4424 Case No. ZA14-100 Attachment E Page 74 Notification Response Form ZA'14-100 Meeting Date: Cctpber 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM KiAvm) E- + A. ae655: zar— law forx w'f-t-r nt Southiai a 'Tx 7 092 -- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed �toundecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for corn ment>s regardisng your position: Signature: f Date: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): 4_0 Murat be property ownar(s) whoEm nmm a(s) are Phone Number (op#ionai): Date: Lks at to p. 01hiprwise cortaet the Planrrl% EMpartmeM. une Sam per propenyr- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 75 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: Octaber 6, 2014 a# 6:30 PEA Simpson, Charles Etex ICathln 104 Brentwood Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX CAR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START 4F THE SCHEDULED PUBL1O BEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above. are hereby in favor of opposedD undecided about (circle or underline one) the preposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: We are 1M opposed to the pears as cu rrentl y proposed. We have met repeatedly with the devaIpper to express ourtancerns no avail. This is essentially the same retail plan proposed by an earlier developerr presented to the November 21, 2013 P&Zr and subse quently withdrawn by the developer. The main objectlon of the surrounding homeowners and HOAs is to the In Iacement of a m assive Kroger and the ksueFs ao ornpanying this type of "Soper Store akin to a <3iant Walrnart into the middle of e)o sting residential areas with high end homes- In additioh, uve have nQt been conv:;i,ced of thene.*d for ahother gravery store in Sotrthlake; rurrenttywe can convei)lentiy rev 0k I Srocery stores within rain uses froln N. White Ch2p,21 and SW 114, Our knernsts have been in helping to shape the development of this beautiful piece of property into si"ething that Is an approprlat,e "Gateway" to Southlak@, that complements existing 5outhlake devpa n pments, and that minsitiom seamlessly into the already existing surrounding high and housing areas_ This type of development does not fit into the surrounding areas cr the rural feel of the "Narth" Side of SoutMake. It IS also Jis4urbing that the demographics targeted by the developer are not even our Southlake citizens but residents of Trophy Club, Westtake and Roanoke. Signature; _ ^ � a -r Date: 10114 Additional signature; Date: fC Printed t 4>f1�oo Must be property cam er(s) whose rwne(s) are printed at top. Otherwise canted the Planning Departnwnt. One form tiler property - Phone Number optional): 0" 4k-O$ Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 76 Notification Response Form ZA 14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6.30 PR Kathleen V. Simpson, 104 Brentwood Circle President, Brentwood Residential Assntiation, Inc. 120 Brentwood Circle (T AD Acct#40987728) Southlake, TX 76092-3716 PLEASE, PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the awner�s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor cf opposed toundecided about Cl erline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Our HOAvehemently opposes the proposed donIoprnFnt, site, anc alat. As yoe, r, :al., :'ris project vra:; prF,�ented November 2413 by a different developer and was turned away by PUTor multiple reasons some of which im;ludcd! 4vermic:irnlag ies+dent opposition, Poor quality of developmeM lack of need of anathw grooery stare to serve Southlake, an6 Resident opposition of " Bjg Box When the new developer started, a group of homeowners were eager to work with thern to shape this gateway to Sntithlake property only to finr} out they had no intention of working with neighbors in good faith to address their concerns. And once they realized the level of opposltion, rather than try'?ng to work with homeowners, they resorted to hiring a high powered PR Spin doctor who boasts an her website: 'If failure is not an option, ya-LNe come to the right place." Combined with a team of attorneys and the distribution of misleading flyers suggesting 5outhlake's Yupport of this project, this developer has tried to lntim date residents, mislead them, and eaten now, refuses to confirm details of the project. As aA example, the PR firm nati€bed us that they were including a Starbucks, sushi and a few other things. We asiced in an mail if that meant the jewelry, clothtng, and furniture sales initiaily prolapsed had been removed. The only answer they would provide Is a non -answer: we hate shared a list of the cmfirmed upscnie rarnewdes that wil! be included in out Town & Country Kroger. We are still' developing pomntlaf future offerings." Signature_ Additional Signature: U Printed Narrle(s),fi'kaCs V. Must kse property ownar(s) vdltasa nam3(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the P Phone Number (optional): Date: 15L51 I q- Date: IZ& I �G-(u-r 1� ITLXoJ ❑apartment. Orie ftirm per property. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 77 Notification Response Form -Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Kathleen V. Simpson,104 Brentwood Circle President, Brentwood Residential Association, Inc_ 2051 N. White Chapel Blvd (TAD Acct#40937736) 5outhlake, TX 76092-3716 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of th"roperty so noted above, are hereby 4' in favor of CopLosedd undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: We are 100% oppo5cd w the plan as currently proposed, VAYE DO NOT NEED A d1 .': ... SUPERSI'OR , AKA A SUPERWALMART LOOKAL.IKE ACROSS i°i'OM OUR ifi�.�a.s 'a`cszsi�„.;`•.` BEAUTIFUL HOMES. This is an inappropriate place for such a development. In `i"0arn&�uuntryt,i�ger addition, we are ver►1 disturbed by the apparent lack of integrity displayed by O;y::;. the developer. After neighbors on the North side repeatedly expressed their ;;,ndtsctlremhuolni�au¢€tppart ?,owingC -:0.4449<. concerns, they have attempted to mislead Soutillake citizens into believing ,? Doe,MaA��jr� that the City of 5outhlake wants them to express their suppoi"t to the Planner's atid'H trvh��lrap�l office and they have handed out hundreds of Lhese misleading flyers. Our sl o utbcsesr t �ariifet� t great city should not be working, with developers with this questionable level of ethical standards. Cer� ;�r�ur� ilt✓ar�katipn;P�....:._.,.`:: 3arr��t�laa��s�9Rd U. Lve-1622:: Date: Signature',�Awt,,- Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): KATRLebi 1, St m p'SONJ i?e�! (�(61jc cjjWt-) Must be property owner(s) whose narne(s) are printed at top_ 01herwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. C--Ibrai! WO Phone Number (optional): ,/V-2-,CL)c l �j G. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 78 Notification Response Form ZA14-I DO Meeting Khtte: MOW! 9, 2014 at 9:3D PM u= o ae• SIP+Go t Sf9Rac��u�}rl 3A Cato-tG R0 Southlake Tifi6k — PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVER BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted abOVer are hereby in favor of �osed to� undecided about (circle or underiine one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: r 1 { w Signature: C4111 Date. Additional Signature: Date: 1 , , 14 Printed Name(s): Must the pmpeq avrner(s) whose nems�&) we panted at lop. Otherwise aoWarl the Planting bepariment, One lkm Per;;;PertY Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 79 Notification Response Forth ZA14-100 Meeting Data: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM KOA"L. f Avac& 'a D c- 5 r 0f1 3ouiiilaki Tx'760 6w, Cbum> 1btCc W -5WT*LA-k6j IX 71149 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELlV9RY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners) of the property so noted above, are horeby in favor of apposed tc undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: I Signature: Date: ! Additional S ignalture: Date: :. Printed I alne(s): AJ Muss he prop" ownei(w ++moor nairdw wa pi'eMW at Wp. Otherwise coetact the Rennin0 oap®nmeM. One kTm Pw prupffty, Phone Number (optional). - Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 80 Notification Response form i•}�Tr C 5ltr+: Meeting Date; October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM �etss: uthl Tx 7'BO 2 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DFLIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the pro a so noted above, are hereby in favor cf opposed to undecided about (arc a or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comrnents regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name()' MU5t vo POD", cnvner(s} whom � Phone Number (optional): a r Cute: Date: -7-141 { C" i ! prani�dat!ca. dthuwiseccwladihePla-Ir,m 'apartmant.Or* famper prop". Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 81 Notification Response Form 14-100 Meeting Date: October g, 2014 at 6:30 FM 41VF /4r fF 1 pocL D 16 STOCITZ' DIe ioutt~IakW1fi - IN 0 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are horeby in favor of 4opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the }proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: t� C, Signature: Date- Additional Signature; 4i' '1 ' bate. ro 1;1 V Printed Name(): .%Aur.t he prepeny oww(s) whaae nan*S) are Phone Number (optional): at oftywwise onta ut kh9 Planrft Qapaf nor � 1 Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 82 1 W70 L I I a.Ck LZ Vf i Y1c,%Jt.r 1Ji 4;Jw 1 SJFa11 ZA14-1 D4 meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:�0 PM ►�,�-rte + ��a�ec-ems= - �f,0 66thla6 Tx 76092 r :: P[annlfi6A-' - 16j0 4o s : - ,._ :fit; PLEASE PROVIDE COUPLETE❑ FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted abover are hereby in favor of (�pposedo' undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: 1 �2� al�- Additional Signature: Printed ar-ne(s): 11Z PAIXX t 6P prupefry owners, ti:'h name(s) are printed at &OP. 01tx w[ee cortad the Phone Number (op4ional); Case No. ZA14-100 Date- 13ePnrtMAN- 0nr.3 form per pmperty- Attachment E Page 83 Notification Response Form Z,#14-1 D0 Mee ng Date: October 9, 2014 at 8.30 PIV r,n e + asp s: Svuthlake Tx 7�08 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE- SDHEDULIED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the properly so noted above, are hereby in favor cf (o:pposed:t()) undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your Position: Signature: Date. Additional Signature: Panted Marne( ), a e 67ua� he propeoty vwnl;r{s; MWIP name(e) are printrd at WP, Qdw;wrea Date: Pianning DAParl t. One foam W propftdY• Phone Number (optional); Case No. ZA14-100 Attachment E Page 84 Notification Response Form Z A 14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM �1fmx� # t1nDe�: Scuthiake Ti 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLF-TED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULIED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners) of the property so noted above_ are hereby in favor of opposedto.. . undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed PT-elirminary Plat referenced above. Space for comrnents regarding your position: Signature: Date:G`� Additionai Signature: Printed N2me(s): 14j:15, ba property over.zr(s) whose ara printed at tap- 0gmnviee carilact the Planning Daparlm—1 Phone Number (opiionai): Date: `arm per prope*. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 85 Notification Response Farm ZA1 a4-100 ti g a i r 8, 2014 at 6M PM �y�A D vu#t#a#[� Tx TB092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE❑ FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of apposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 4 l J k Signature: �� Date: ' N Additional Signature: }ate: Printed Nar1e (). l • r �) :olust be picperky mvrw(s) whose narne{s} are p4nlad at top, OthsrwisL- contact the PlanNftD D&p®rtrnenk. Ona farm per prop Y- Phone Number (cptional), Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 86 Notification Response Form ZA14-,100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 5:30 FIM FJj",- i A-bCe—&, SoTA-1-06 Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVER' BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the proup�e-rky ao noted above, are hereby in favor of s to'1' undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat re# renced above. Space for comments rogarding your position: Signature": - --- . Additiona;jn1:Dr(aj Si Picture; Printed N(s): Musk be properS whose rramo(s) are 1 PhL>ne Number (aptienai): Date: . I Date,, " jj pip Ing dapeFtrnant Onh fairn pe- pYapn ; Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 87 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 al southPak Txis PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF SHE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to-- undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Spero for comments regarding your position: Vv(e dw r)6�:- \Ali. A 4r I V- ��Ffr'j -ILL- t 41. Signature: Date� Additional Signature: Date: Vi"Printed Name(s): �-S ).A i VC01 Mu5' bi� propo.7 ov;ner(F) v1h,�rw&, name(&) Wpdrrlod a tv . 01har<hse cants Plannlrkg Depafterlt. Ore Form per property. Phone dumber {optional}:`r- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 88 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: O&Dber 9, 2Q14 at 6:30 PM IJ E +�A4J)�#JS: _ .._ puthl0lce�x T6 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DEU ERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, BcDInrg the owner(s) of the property so noted above. are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or undedine ore) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: dditicnalSignature: ,trl d 'l1 Date: I U Printed Name() lr hlcaet oa proper avm arfA wnasr~ noire(a) we prink Phone Number (optional)' at lop. 0!h9rw1sc contact the Planning Department. One farm per PTQGeFtY. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 89 Notification Response Form ZA14-I00 Meeting Date. October 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM Southlake x 7609 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUSLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (� opposed to u , ecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for commerrts regarding your pas itiyyo%n. Signatures' Additional Signature: Printed Names): la(� r4lust Le propemly awnerfs) viriase {sj are Phone !Number (optional); re -fit cTv r i10 �- I i tir c� L�" at RQp- 4lherwrse copbgd the Planning Department, SCp Date; Date: Per pMpe0y- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 90 Notification Response Form ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 El f hdA-me- + Aw.)Lk . AA ArV-L14sF'Lie11 VJ�;ti Southfake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE MART OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the mvner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Flat referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: i z - LL"" s ��1 Ic U4 ivx `e. A't ! a ho klw Signature: _ Date: AdditionalSignature: Date: Printed Name(s): .r 4Ctk,, t— ;%lust be property owners} whoso 9amF(s} aro pr'-nCed at ap,. therwise rnnlarl Lha Planni,c pr3yrtrnerd, Inc rnrn per p � v �{ Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 91 Notification Response Form ZA1 4-100 Meeting Date: Ofr bor 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM k+�11+4f + A'DbtC55: l_4C'M �-'l De- Avcc o RC wn" H,L L-D Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC FEARING. Being owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Platt referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: t0 aj-t Additional Signature: Date - Printed Name(s)' i4e0-- L A-J1 t LJD Muel be prmport f cwne*(s) wWMSO Mafne(S) are printad ut tap. Otherwise cordact'hre PlannIN depurtmard. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 92 Notification Response i=onn ZA14-100 Meeting Date: October 9, 2014 at 6:30 Paul yAq,nkl w Roer—c'Ss: Zj� rav southll Tx Tem PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position' 1} !� cep s��rT ignatu Date: 4 - Additional Signature: � Date: Printed Narne(s): TA/W MuS, bD prap" awner(s) whose rw nKs) are primed at by OthvrMW onWxM the F%nN" DePadment. Ona Form pei p^opON- Phone [Number (optional): q17 - 9 - r Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 93 Notification Response Form ZA14-"100 Mmong Date- OcWbor 9, 2M4 at 6:30 PA WAI nr e 4 /m 41 "� 'TvArJ 10�' Z RccOS Y Vrvr�t +A V6 Rqnu,r.+0 NOGG GONE 80ut Jsk�a Tx 7t&2 PLEAS PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of posed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above. Space for cornments regafdIn9 your position: Signature; Date:' ° AdditionalSignature: Date: r �l Printed Name(s): J V ers 2` c c a y r L)14 AJ4 C- ZZV Los Mu2kt be propert} owner(e) v�ho56 namawam prw&d#ttm OdwmmMcoroolhePlurnrilngDepadmionI One fprm Per PrWvP y. 'hone Number (optional); -- Case No. Attachment E ZA14-100 Page 94