The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7A13 CITY OF S0UTHLA1<.,,E Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 CASE NO: ZA14-082 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Southlake Villas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Castle Development Group, BHB Engineering & Surveying is requesting approval of a zoning change and site plan from "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District on property located at 310 E. Southlake Boulevard. SPIN Neighborhood # 7. DETAILS: On behalf of the Castle Development Group, BHB Engineering & Surveying is requesting approval of a zoning change and site plan from "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow development of four (4) medical / general office buildings totaling approximately 22,448 sf. This proposal will modify a previously approved zoning change and site plan for four (4) general office buildings totaling approximately 31,000 sf. of floor area. The new S-P-1 zoning proposes to allow all listed 0-1 — Office District uses to include specific medical and pharmacy uses. Following the recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the revised list is as follows: • General medical • Physical therapy practice • Compounding pharmacy • Out -patient . Audio therapy surgery • Speech therapy • Medical • Other supporting health service specialists uses similar in nature and • Dialysis clinic character • Medical imaging Revised Site Data Summary Acreage 2.89 acres Existing Zoning S-P-1 Proposed Zoning S-P-1 Future Land Use Office Commercial Open Space (%) 42.31 % Impervious Coverage (%) 57.69% (0-1 cannot exceed 65%) General Office Floor Area 11,224 sq. ft. (2 buildings) Medical Office Floor Area 11,224 sq. ft. (2 buildings) Total Building Floor Area 22,448 square feet (5,612 sq. ft. each) Required Parking 115 spaces Provided Parking 115 spaces Case No. ZA14-082 Proposed Development Regulations: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to include the following: 1. To allow the proposed dumpster screening wall five (5) feet within the eastern building setback, adjacent to neighboring commercial zoning. 2. To allow the proposed materials within the bufferyard as provided on the site plan bufferyard summary chart. 3. To allow existing tree cover to be preserved at a minimum of 7.9% (3,612 sq. ft.) 4. Site lighting shall be consistent with the Site Photometric Plan, providing near zero light at property lines adjacent to residential properties, and a maximum light pole height of 20'. Furthermore, site light poles shall be equipped with motion sensor switches, contingent on City of Southlake Police Department approval. 5. The two southern buildings, A and B, shall be medical use; and the two northern buildings, C and D, shall be general office use. 6. All trees immediately adjacent to residential properties shall be Evergreen consistent with the Landscape Plan. 7. No uses with 24-hour operation shall be permitted within the proposed development. 8. No uses with drive-thru operations shall be permitted within the proposed development. Variances Requested: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective city ordinances with the following requested variances: 1. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of 75 feet at this location. Requesting a variance to allow a forty-two (42') foot stacking depth for the proposed access drive to E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). At the October 23, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant requested to table their item until November 6, 2014. The applicant has submitted revised plans along with a narrative describing the proposed changes; this document is included in Attachment `C' (page 3) of this report. Generally, the changes include the percentage of use from 75% Medical and 25% General Office to 50% Medical and 50% General Office; a decrease in impervious coverage from 62.87% to 57.69% - resulting in a decrease in parking spaces from 147 to 115; the applicant has also brought the interior landscape into compliance so the original variance request has been removed; and, the applicant has proposed to remove the existing wood and brick screening wall and replace it with an 8' screening wall constructed entirely with masonry. On November 6, 2014, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval with multiple stipulations. Please see Attachment `A', page 3 of this report for full motion details. In discussions with police department staff, it has been determined that the motion sensor lights as requested by the Commission, would not result in a safety hazard. The applicant has submitted revisions accordingly for City Council consideration. Current opposition for this Case No. ZA14-082 application exceeds 20% which will require a super majority vote at City Council for approval at second reading. Component Previous Approval Proposed Number of buildings 4 4 Number of lots 4 1 3 — one story Building height 1 — 2 story (later 3 story with 4 — one story attic) Use General office Medical office 50% General office 50% Floor area 31,000 sf 22,448 Zoning S-P-1 with 0-1 uses S-P-1 with 0-1 uses Covered parking 12 spaces None Driveway stacking ± 40 ± 42 variance stone masonry, barrel tile Concrete tile roof, cedar Building materials roof, cedar trim and shall be trim, stucco, cast stone, equal in materials and quality stone veneer of construction Component S-P-1 0-1 Canopy trees = 11 Canopy trees = 11 North Bufferyard Accent trees = 21 Accent trees = 21 Shrubs = 28 Shrubs = 28 Canopy trees = 10 Canopy trees = 10 South Bufferyard Accent trees = 7 Accent trees = 7 Shrubs = 40 Shrubs = 39 East Bufferyard Canopy trees = 3 / 3 Canopy trees = 3 / 3 (SF-1A / C2) Accent trees = 5 / 6 Accent trees = 5 / 6 Shrubs = 7 / 22 Shrubs = 7 / 22 Canopy trees = 11 Canopy trees = 11 West Bufferyard Accent trees = 22 Accent trees = 22 Shrubs = 29 Shrubs = 29 Impervious 57.69% Maximum 65% Coverage Canopy trees = 24 Canopy trees = 24 Accent trees = 48 Accent trees = 48 Interior Landscape Shrubs = 533 Shrubs = 299 Ground cover = 8,139 sf Ground cover = 1,794 sf Seasonal color = 394 sf Seasonal color = 240 sf Case No. ZA14-082 ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT Case No. ZA14-082 Component S-P-1 0-1 Tree Preservation 7.9% 60% Dumpster screen wall 5' within the east bldg. setback Shall not be located in the bufferyard Fence 8' masonry adjacent to all residential F1-8' opaque fence Driveway stacking 42' (variance) 75' Parking spaces 115 115 *Staff reviewed the submitted landscape plan and the proposed bufferyard plant material adjacent to the residential properties is evergreen. (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) SPIN Meeting Summary (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 30, 2014 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-542b (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 / Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Castle Development Group APPLICANT: BHB Engineering & Surveying PROPERTY SITUATION: 310 E. Southlake Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3, W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687 LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial CURRENT ZONING: S-P-1 — Detailed Site Plan District PROPOSED ZONING: S-P-1 — Detailed Site Plan District HISTORY: The Southlake Villas development was originally approved by City Council on March 18, 2008. (ZA07-129) November 3, 2009, City Council approved an amendment to the Southlake Villas zoning/site plan which allowed a change to the original approved request for the finish out of the attic space creating a 3rd floor to Building 1 at the southeast corner of the lot. (ZA09-046) CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held August 12, 2014. See Attachment `D' of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Land Use Plan The Office Commercial category is a commercial category designed and intended for the exclusive use of office and limited to office -related activities. It is established for and will be allocated to those districts best suited for supporting commercial activity of an office character. It has been established to encourage and permit general professional and business offices of high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped surroundings with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so controlled as to be generally compatible with existing and future adjacent and surrounding residential development. Properties with this designation may serve as a transition between established residential neighborhoods, major roadways, and retail development. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan & Median Plan The Southlake 2030 Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this road. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions This location will have one access drive to Southlake Boulevard. There is an additional access point proposed through a common access easement with the adjacent property to the east. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-082 Page 1 24hr I West Bound (25,006) East Bound (25,639) AM I Peak AM (1,501)11:45 AM-12:45 PM I Peak AM (2,720) 7:15 — 8:15 AM PM I Peak PM (2,580) 4:45 — 5:45 PM 'ased on the 2013 Citv ofSonthlake Traffic Com Peak PM (1,702) 12:30 — 1:30 PM Report Original Traffic Impact — Medical 75% / General 25% Revised Traffic Impact — Medical 50% / General 50% Traffic Comparison Analysis Approved Proposed Proposed Item General Total Medical Office Use Office Total square footage 31,000 31,000 11,224 11,224 22,448 Vtpd* 341 341 406 124 530 Peak AM in 42 42 27 15 42 Peak AM out 5 5 14 2 16 Peak PM in 8 8 20 3 23 Peak PM out 38 38 30 14 44 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition WATER & SEWER: Water There is an existing 12-inch water line which runs adjacent to Southlake Boulevard that serves this development. Sewer There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line adjacent to Southlake Boulevard, as well as a 6-inch sanitary sewer line that runs approximately 275 feet from southwest to northeast across the property. TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed tree conservation plan does not conform to the Existing Tree Cover Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-082 Page 2 Sixty percent (60%) of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved and according to the calculations provided only 7.9% (3,612 sqft.) is proposed to be preserved. An S-P-1 regulation has been written to address this item. The only trees proposed to be preserved on the site are one (1) 6" hackberry in the southeast corner of the property, two (2) 6" oak on the northeast border and seven (7) hackberry in the northwest corner of the property. All of the trees are volunteer trees that have grown along the fence line of the property and no internal quality trees are proposed to be preserved. If a fence or wall is built along the west and/or east property lines the trees proposed to be preserved would be altered. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P- 2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. P&Z ACTION: November 6, 2014; Approved (5-0) subject to the following: • Site plan review summary #4, dated October 30, 2014; • Staff report dated October 31, 2014; • Granting the driveway variance request as presented; • Noting that the 20' pole lighting the applicant has presented at the property line will be no brighter than 0.02 foot candles; • The medical use will be limited to the front two buildings fronting Southlake Boulevard; • Amending the landscape plan to indicate all evergreen trees at the perimeter; • There will be no 24-hour operations at any of the facilities; • There will be motion sensors for site lighting subject to approval by the City Department of Public Safety; • All of the 0-1 medical pharmacy uses requested in the application will be permitted noting the pharmacy will be limited to compounding pharmacy with no drive-thru; • And, noting there will be an 8' masonry fence adjacent to all residential lots as presented. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 30, 2014. There is an associated single -lot plat showing in review and pending filing regarding this property. The plat is required to be filed prior to the issuance of any building permits. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-082 Page 3 Vicinity Map Southlake Villas 1034 1fl27 1036 78 22L9918 920 sip 4 M ALD BLV❑ s 6 613 915 917 s79 '9 21 • v r� �r3 82Q w�v $�5 $77 819 u�� UTHLAKE aLV❑ 291 251 271 261 241 600 1 620 1 63 315 1 325 1415 1 425 1 525 1 535 N38 g040 p 1042 s�o sa a E 601 611 ZA 14-882 Zoning change & Site Plan 1.10 `ee` Case No. Attachment B ZA14-082 Page 1 BAIRD, HAMPTON &BROWN, INC. a - B ENGINEERING & SURVEYING September 15, 2014 City of Southlake Department of Planning & Development Services 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Tel: (817) 748-8069 RE: SOUTHLAKE VILLAS OFFICE DEVELOPMENT 310 E. Southlake Blvd., 2.8-Acre Tract BHB Project No. 14.711.00 Department of Planning & Development Services: On behalf of our client, Castle Development Group, we presenting this Site Plan submittal for the proposed Southlake Villas project, located at 310 E. Southlake Blvd. The existing zoning for the 2.8-acre tract is SP-1, and the current use is vacant. This tract is adjacent to existing single-family residences to the west, north, and partially the east. The remaining portion of the eastern adjacency is commercial. The City of Southlake Future Land Use Plan recommends the development of this tract to be Office/Commercial Use. Our proposed plan is consistent with the current zoning and that land use recommendation. As you may recall, this property was approved for a zoning change March 19, 2008 (Case ZAO-129), from Agricultural District to SP-1 Detailed Site Plan District with 0-1 Office District uses. On November 4, 2009 this site was again re -zoned (Case ZA09-046) to process the revised site plan, and was approved as submitted including all exceptions and variances from the previous zoning case. The attached Site Plan shows proposed access to the adjacent commercial site, contingent on the owner's approval, which we are currently requesting. This proposed development consists of four 5,979 SF buildings, where three-quarters of the developments building square footage will primarily be used for medical purposes, and one -quarter will be general office. We anticipate the construction of this site to be completed in phases, starting with the southwest proposed building. In order to proceed with development we are requesting a change from the currently approved SP-1 Specific Site Plan District to a revised SP-1 Specific Site Plan District. Statement of Intent and Purpose: Our objective in this zoning request is to proceed with the development of the improvements discussed above. The site layout, architecture, and landscape improvements have been designed as an easily accessible site providing medical and professional office services to the community, while contributing to the aesthetic enrichment of the surrounding neighborhood and the City of Southlake. Design and Architecture: The design approach for the buildings is to combine natural colors, materials, textures and architectural detailing into a high quality, cohesive one-story development. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 1 Please see the attached supporting material, including the SP-1 Zoning Regulation addressing specific site concerns and requested variances. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact us at your convenience via telephone, (817) 251-8550 x302, or email, cfranke@bhbinc.com. Sincerely, BHB Engineering & Surveying, Inc. f � ris Fr e, P.E. Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 2 BAIRD, HAMPTON & BROWN, INC. a - B ENGINEERING & SURVEYING October 29, 2014 Ms. Lorrie Fletcher, Planner City of Southlake 1400 Main St., Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 RE, Case No. ZA14-082 Zoning Change and Site Plan — Southlake Villas Office Development BHB Project Number 14.711.00 Ms. Fletcher, As you know, our Planning and Zoning case was presented last Thursday, October 23r6, At that time we were unaware of any opposition to our proposed development, however several adjacent property owners attended the meeting and shared their concerns. We are writing to share the changes to the proposed Site Plan, which have been made in order to address these concerns. The items listed below have been revised to accommodate the adjacent property owner's wishes. • The proposed land use for the site has been revised to show 50% medical and 50% general office. • The proposed parking has been reduced to the minimum number of spaces required, in order to increase the proposed landscaping and reduce the proposed traffic generated. • The existing screening wall adjacent to the eastern commercial property has been removed, at the request of the adjacent property owner. • The existing brick and wood screening wall will be removed and replaced with an 8' screening wall constructed entirely with masonry. • The proposed landscaping has been increased and now meets or exceeds the City's ordinance. These changes are shown in the revised submittal, anticipated to be presented at the November 6t" Planning and Zoning meeting. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments at your earliest convenience. Please note that we are meeting with the adjacent homeowner's association Monday, November 3'd, to share the revised Site Plan, and address any additional concerns prior to the Planning and Zoning meeting. Sincerely, BHB Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Chris Fr ?ke,E Civil Engineer CC: File EA2014.000.00012014.711.0001DocslSite Plan Revision 10-28-14.doc 4550 SH 360, Ste 180, Grapevine, Texas 760511 Tel: 817-251-85501 Fax: 817-251-8810 TBPE Firm #44 1 TBPLS Firm #10011302 I www.bhbinc.com Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 3 S-P-1 Regulation Document — 11-11-2014 BAIRD, HAMPTON & BROWN, INC. a - B ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Southlake Villas SP-1 Regulations Permitted Uses and Development Regulations: We are proposing the following Permitted Uses and Development Regulations for the property, as follows: Permitted Uses: This property shall be limited to the uses found in the "0-1" Office District, as described in Section 18 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, with inclusion of the following uses: 1. General Medical Practice 2. Out -Patient Surgery 3. Medical Specialists 4. Dialysis Clinic 5. Medical Imaging 6. Physical Therapy 7. Compounding Pharmacy 8. Audio Therapy 9. Speech Therapy 10. Other supporting health service uses similar in nature and character Development Regulations: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to include the following: To allow the proposed dumpster screening wall five (5) feet within the eastern building setback, adjacent to neighboring commercial zoning. To allow the proposed materials within the bufferyard as provided on the site plan bufferyard summary chart. To allow existing tree cover to be preserved at a minimum of 7.9% (3,612 sq. ft.) Site lighting shall be consistent with the Site Photometric Plan, providing near zero light at property lines adjacent to residential properties, and a maximum light pole height of 20'. Furthermore, site light poles shall be equipped with motion sensor switches, contingent on City of Southlake Police Department approval. The two southern buildings, A and B, shall be medical use; and the two northern buildings, C and D, shall be general office use. All trees immediately adjacent to residential properties shall be Evergreen consistent with the Landscape Plan. No uses with 24-hour operation shall be permitted within the proposed development - No uses with drive-thru operations shall be permitted within the proposed development - Variances Requested: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective city ordinances with the following requested variances: 1. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of 75 feet at this location. Requesting a variance to allow a forty-two (42') foot stacking depth for the proposed access drive to E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). 4550 SH 360, Ste 180, Grapevine, Texas 760511 Tel: 817-251-85501 Fax: 817-251-8810 TBPE Firm 444 1 TBPLS Firm #10011302 1 www.bhbinc.com Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 4 Proposed site plan — 11-11-2014 _ _ aloz eaeouo a' 6 ui.(a.u3n5�4 �e.�am wrtiJ3 is. � 6V%31 'ALNf1O71NtllfLtll '3NtllHLnOS ng�a Ea p� og roul •..Oa V uo}dZH •P,!Da �� 3H51i m s�o» {soLLwll aAM3NnHLnos 3uc StlllIA 3NtllHLnos�ito oM anDH� 1K3wdo7r A3_a {C � 3715�d7 NVld znDA%n 3112 u I 4 n� I II I I I f 11A I I , �• IIi11SItIt F =5 i la��a 0 a I m I — 9 =1 C = Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 5 Al Case No. ZA1 4-082 Previously approved site plan (ZA07-129) Attachment C Page 7 Previously approved site plan (ZA09-046) Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 8 Tree preservation plan ass �v 14u,�o �u3� d � -- 'u GYKill'AuulaalHvuarl'aM1nH11W8 s.` z p.. 7u� wwig V ualdwoH W!�8 o 3,m w®n� w IBv1� wasmH DMROGc .3 o�c a �■ of dROtl91N PiaOR9n3a �Y$��r§ y o- �� 4� KWW HOUYAUnNOO �1 4� N MIX 6a� w b AN,�;� B�'k Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 9 Colored landscape plan — 11-11-2014 _ _ �i S�ttuu— Bu�.(an�3nS P ,1",— !!a 3 '�u�'�MO1B i Il0�GU1GH W!99�p� _ sioc dR vw w � a�sn'OLSN3N BVK3.L noo LNvauvi nmanoB (BOL1 W�'MlB 3MtllNlllOS'30Lt SYi71A 3xvimi os xI i ¢g 4 �h�i ¢ F S S il fit- gg J 31w .ph dJlOiI9 SN9YidOi3A3O �� NOId 3d1]SONVI j#�l�en s �j € g 4 _ 371NIVZBEEEEEEEtj . Case No. Attachment C ZA14-082 Page 10 Building elevations All four buildings are proposed to be the same size and design SOUTHLAKE VILLAS BUILDING A - EAST ELEVATION SOUTHLAKE VILLAS BUILDING A -WEST ELEVATION Case No. ZA14-082 CASTLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP CASTLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP U S' 16' 0 S' 16, Attachment C Page 11 SOUTHLAKE VILLAS BUILDING A - NORTH ELEVATION SOUTHLAKE VILLAS BUILDING A - SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTHLAKE VILLAS - NEIGHBOR'S VIEW Case No. ZA14-082 kCA5TLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP D 8' 16' 0 8. u u u CASTLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP A p C n i T E C T i 9 8' Attachment C Page 12 USOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: ZA14-082 Project Name: Southlake Villas Office Development SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #7 Meeting Date: August 12, 2014 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twenty-one (21) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Konstantine Bakintas, Baird, Hampton & Brown, Inc.; et al three (3) from Castle Development Group City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I and Jerod Potts, Planner I City Staff Contact: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I: (817) 748-8069 or Ifletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation: The property is located at 310 E. Southlake Boulevard. Development Details: Previous zoning change and site plan approval for this property was granted previously in 2007 and again in 2009 (ZA07-129 & ZA09-046). The reconfiguration of the proposed plan is not consistent with the approved S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District and site plan that is in place so a new application for zoning change and site plan is required. The proposal is for four (4) single -story office buildings ranging from 4,416 to 6,600 square feet in size. The property is approximately 2.9 acres. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-082 Page 1 Presented at SPIN: _ ' , MMEM ► &AMMdWam, 16 � mil-. �'�'• r'F _ _IM P I,� � r _ SOo�r�ae oPme�tG i w tc- Case No. Attachment D ZA14-082 Page 2 � a. 9P : i:- x a 9 `O� 9 9 0 9� � a+�l� et: G QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: • What variances are you asking for? Impervious coverage looks like it exceeds what is allowed. o We propose to construct a storm water detention basin to help with drainage issues. Our impervious coverage is about 64.6%; the maximum allowed is 65%. • What about the stacking depth? Will you be asking for a variance to that? o That very well could be the case. We are planning a driveway off of Southlake Boulevard and propose a connection to the property to the east which should help. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-082 Page 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA14-082 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 10/30/14 Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan — Southlake Villas Office Development APPLICANT: BHB Engineering Chris Franke, PE 4550 SH 360, Suite 180 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: 817-251-8550 Email: cfranke@bhbinc.com OWNER: Castle Development Group Andrew Miller 5751 Kroger Drive, Suite 127 Keller, TX 76244 Phone: 817-337-3433 Email: amiller@castledevgroup.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/29/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LORRIE FLETCHER AT (817) 748-8069 / Ifletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us or DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072 / dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us. Planning Department Review — Lorrie Fletcher, Planner 1 / Ifletch er(a-)-ci.southIake.tx.us / 817- 748-8069: All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The following changes are needed: a. The driveway shown does not meet the minimum stacking depth of 75 feet. The submitted plan indicates ±42 feet of stacking is provided. A variance has been requested. 2. The submitted site plan proposes a drive approach at the southeast corner leading into the adjacent property. Provide permission from the adjacent property owner for a common access easement. The applicant is currently in negotiation with the adjacent property owner. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The proposed tree conservation plan does not conform to the Existing Tree Cover Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D. Sixty percent (60%) of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved and according to the calculations provided only 7.9% (3,612 sqft.) is proposed to be preserved. An S-P-1 regulation has been written to address this item. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-082 Page 1 The only trees proposed to be preserved on the site are one (1) 6" hackberry in the southeast corner of the property, two (2) oaks on the northeast border and seven (7) hackberry in the northwest corner of the property. All of the trees are volunteer trees that have grown along the fence line of the property and no internal quality trees are proposed to be preserved. If a fence or wall is built along the west and/or east property lines the trees proposed to be preserved would be altered. For property sought to be zoned zoning district, including an S-P-1 Planned Unit Development, or consider the application for a corresponding development appl Zoning Commission shall review Council regarding the application. Council finds that the Plan or Anal for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the ication (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and the application and make a recommendation to the City The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the ysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: The plant materials proposed to be "Provided" within the bufferyards do not meet the minimum plant material quantities required to be planted. An S-P-1 regulation has been written to address this item. # Denotes Required Items. Denotes informational Items. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-082 Page 2 Public Works/Engineering Review Aleiandra Avala, P.E. Om Ghartv Chhetri, P.E. aayala(o-)-ci.southlake.tx.us ochhetri(o-)-ci.southlake.tx.us (817) 748-8274 (817) 748-8089 GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer utility lines are proposed within an easement. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: Manholes shall be required at the end of the 8" sanitary sewer. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Water mains and sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Tie-in to existing storm sewer in FM 1709 requires TxDOT approval. 2. Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100- year storm events. Provide preliminary size of the detention pond. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 3. Weighted C value shall require further review with the civil construction plans to insure that the value used does not underestimate the runoff volumes for this site. Case No. Attachment E ZA14-082 Page 3 4. Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #23 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($309.83/Acre). * Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site/development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. * Runoff coefficients (C) for existing and proposed conditions shall be obtained from iSWMM manual. * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre -construction, construction and post -construction erosion control measures. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements, Assistant Fire Marshal kclements(a)ci.south lake.tx. us 817-748-8233 FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment E ZA14-082 Page 4 Hydrants required at a maximum spacing of 300 feet for commercial locations that contain un-sprinkled buildings. (Adequate hydrants not provided to meet requirements) INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed. Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office. General Informational Comments: No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS —exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA14-082 Page 5 Surrounding Property Owners Southlake Villas 920 922 816 817 819 211 1251 1271 ` 291 1 315 325 415 425 227 261 241 231 7pq 700 n 0 630 LL 70 EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD 535 641 711 721 601 631 tau-" Q X • 1. Blanchard, Felix & Bien SF1-A 915 Emerald Blvd # B 1.02 It O IF 2. Philip, IsaacJBtux Reni J 9F1-A 821 Pearl Dr 1.25 O 3. Nguyen, Lang T Btux M ay Hoang 9F1-A 823 Pearl Dr 1.02 O 4. Mabry, Jay H BtuxJ�ne D 9F1-A 913 Emerald Blvd 1.01 O 5. Calloway'sNursery Inc SP2 291 ESbuthlake Blvd 3.11 NR 6. Providence Bancshares Corp SP2 315 ESouthlake Blvd 1.07 F 7. Providence Bancshares Corp SP2 325 ESouthlake Blvd 1.03 F 8. Fbentgen Fbal Estate Uc SP1 525 ESbuthlake Blvd 1.17 NR 9. Star Fbal Estate Company T2 425 ESbuthlake Blvd 1.04 NR 10. Gla Properties Uc SP2 415 ESbuthlake Blvd 1.00 NR 11. 9iivkumar, Pbonam SF1-A 917 Emerald Blvd 1.18 NR 12. Spinom, Michael BtuxYolanda 9F1-A 915 Emerald Blvd 0.99 O 13. Smthlake Project Group Lp 9P1 310 ESbuthlake Blvd 3.08 NR 14. Holt Dental Care C2 600 ESouthlake Blvd 1.14 F 15. Mellinger, J. rnesJBtuxSaraJ 9F1-A 919 Emerald Blvd 1.07 O 16. Dctn3 381 Office Southlake Tx C2 620 ESouthlake Blvd 1.15 O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Notices Sent: Sixteen (16) Responses Received: In Favor: Two (2) Opposed: Seven (7) One (1) response received outside the 200' buffer as opposed Case No. ZA14-082 NR: No Response Attachment F Page 1 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Providence Bancshares Corp 325 E Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx T6082 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: date: Additional zignakre: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Chherwise cDrdagiKhe Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ,f2--?413 1.00I100A 0:11 Case No. ZA14-082 EVEIL VLOZISLIOL Attachment F Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 . Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Blanchard, Felix & Ellen 2727 Hidden Lake Dr Grapevine Tx 76051 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: `k-Li11 - W00D I N.5e4Ti O A) EE,�JCe f')(reKJMZ LAG' T�a4 , , Nc2 s l�ols� Signature: 3�&�� `� Date:-14 Additional Signature: _� Date: 0 Printed Name(s): 4" e,Jt� tip tL\a Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) ar printed at top. Otherwise contact the Phone Number (optional): "-��--(Q'75 ,�00 Case No. ZA14-082 Department. One form per property. Attachment F Page 3 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Dctn3 381 Office Southlake Tx 620 E Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the in favor of ) brmosed to ol circle or L the proposed Zoning Chan ge so noted above, are hereby Space for comments regarding your position: undecided about one) Plan r1eferenced above. V e' 5L'e io' ? ite. propo-5� d Cyv, k, ww. Hz)1 + 1].e�4-k l 0,Ag 4" Svb)K,L+ projpLa;-/ . _N�e, is +iao ntivCM AcAotm I S Wove- _ -j�ra �%� -} ro� �k U �✓ &,y�U 1l a,, A ilv ALA«-"4 _ Signature: Date: 1,1114/i Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): byeAno, 3& 041'c 56'+Q'_'Ly T� _ Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 4 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Holt Dental Care 600 E Southlake Blvd Ste 100 Southlake Tx 76092 Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the wner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor �of�opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: kY-e Q Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): �h / �- Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 07, --Af- Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 5 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Mabry, Jay H Etux Jane D 913 Emerald Blvd Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of Copposed:to � undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ZI4 1674 zy /d�^oir- 421wo/ ae &-.r c ae r w- . r.J?b /:2k '7f4Cc/1 L?l� 7'��SG b��n.c' / Si74�G, b FiOH►�J O'9Z S'/dCL�S 6-% L"��C e�Ke'iI�LOR7mt/G']�; /in:7':'.i4 t�e_ Qr2ourrf 67 AGt,?`raru i` l`h¢ .5r.�c.:ess cts r.StL� 4.3 mtie,:oc9 f�; 4:oAlze . .Caar`/. COW& 4rrJers czrc Signature: Date: ld Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 3alne- �, abrV rid i�i�Y'y Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise col tact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 5l c--7- Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 6 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Nguyen, Long T Etux May Hoang 823 Pearl Dr Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor oppose�to ` ndecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: r kfI Signature: C� Additional Signature: _ Printed Name(s): tolm /SUcleu q' Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) pr printed at p. therwise contact Phone Number (optional): $11 A - 23Z.$ Case No. ZA14-082 r Date: ® / Date: to zr 014 One form per property. Attachment F Page 7 1QM=14 vso Southlake Villas proposal R. May To: lIetcher@ci.southlake.tK.us Dear Ms. Fletcher, CIAOU"deAm s Mall - SOU Nsle Vlllea pnpffld Lorne Fletcher altletcher@cl.southleke.tx.uv Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:37 AM As a resident of Diamond Circle Estates I have concerns about any commercial development that backs up to any resident's home. I have a fair amount of experience regarding these issues. My concerns revolve around privacy, security, noise and property value impact. Privacy issues for the residents directly affected by this proposed project can be minimized by providing a brick fence of 7 ft or higher and the planting of trees or large gnawing bushes to create a barrier between the residents and the businesses. This will help with noise and prcrAde some privacy and an incremental amount of security. There is precedence for this as is evident by the plans negotiated by the residents and developer during the project at 630 Southlake Blvd. the developer built a high brick wall and plarrted trees in the neighbors yard behind the project and worked out an agreement to address lighting issues and refuse disposal. The proposed buildings at Southlake Villas cannot have any windows of a height, either from elevation or basic structural design which would allow visual access into neighbors property. Property values, as you are aware, can be negatively impacted by poor esthetics. The proposed structures must meet the highest standards of structural taste and decor. I would be supportive of a project whereby the developer works directly with the residents who are most affected by this commercial property and their privacy, security, noise and property %clue concerns are mitigated. I will oppose a development which cannot provide these fundamental protections to the homeowners. Regards, FZch O'Day Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 8 From: Long Nguyen Date: November 5, 2014 at 9:12:48 PM CST To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: May Hoang Subject: Southlake Villas Development Council members, We are wilting with regards to Ordinance No. 480-542b (ZA14-082). My wife and I live at 823 Pearl Drive in Southlake. When we decided to buy our home in 2009 we were fully aware of the zoning of the property that borders our eastern property line. With young children, we spend many of our afternoons and momings in our backyard that backs up to the proposed development. Recently the new owners of this property have proposed the development of Southlake Villas, a medical office complex, which will require a change in zoning. The proposed change to Medical Office zoning will increase traffic patterns, noise, loss of privacy and home value. We appreciate the efforts that the owners and developer have made to help alleviate our concerns. However, we feel that the proposed plan as it currently stands does not go far enough. First, we request no more than 25% medical office use that is limited to the southeast building. This will limit the total number of vehicles per day and keep that traffic furthest away from any residential property. Also we need to be guaranteed that these medical offices will maintain normal business hours. The current trend for medical offices is to offer their patients extended and weekend hours. These hours are good for the business, but they impose heavily on our privacy and security. These hours are especially true of dialysis centers, radiology suites, and sleep study centers. We find that these types of practices or any practice with extended hours as unacceptable in residential areas, Next, we propose several changes to help with privacy and noise abatement. The current plan has no evergreens in the landscape design. We propose a change in the landscape design to include 80% evergreens. This ensures year round privacy coverage and noise abatement. Furthermore, to ensure privacy we cannot have security cameras facing outward from the proposed development into any residential property. Lastly, we want the parking lights to have motion activation and be turned off by 9pm. This would limit light pollution into our backyards and bedrooms and help with privacy. We understand and want the owner of this property to have a successful and profitable business. We believe that the requests that we have laid out here are reasonable and is accommodating to all parties involved. If you have any questions or would like to speak with us please call or email us. Respectfully, Long Nguyen, MD 214-704-4505 May Hoang, PharmD 214-808-0433 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 9 Ffonx Felix Blanchard Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 2:30 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Fwd: Southlake Villas ZA14-082 Dear Mayor and City Council, We are not happy about the Planning and Zoning ruling last night about the Southlake Villas project. P and Z said that the project was much improved from two weeks ago, which is true. But not improved from the original approval. The developer want to go from zero medical to 50% medical. We think the increased traffic and noise next to a residential area is not acceptable. We have agreed to 25% medical, but they say that is not enough because of economics. They knew what was approved when they bought it, same as i knew there was commercial behind my property when i bought it. We feel that the approved plan was approved with a lot of thought and consideration and should be honored as it is today. We tried to be reasonable and that is why we agreed to the increase of 25% medical, even though the original plan has zero medical. I have attached previous communication to help you understand the history. As elected officials we feel you need to protect the residential areas that have made Southlake what it is today. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 10 Thank you for your time. Felix and Ellen Blanchard 915B Emerald Bluff. Southlake, TX 817-675-2400 Begin forwarded message: From: felix Blanchard Date: November 4, 2014 at 10:18:32 AM CST Subject: Southlake Villas7A14-082 To: kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us I have attached an email from Lorrie Fletcher dated August 26th. I spoke at the last meeting concerning Southlake Villas and was very upset that I was not allowed to speak after the developer and staff said that they did not know anyone did not like the proposal and the SPIN meeting was not well attended. As you can see from the email in August, I was informed they were dropping their proposal. I was not notified of the SPIN meeting and I faxed my opposition on the Monday before the meeting. So, I was very confused why your committee was not informed that there was opposition. We met with the developer last night and are still confused. 1. They agreed to an 8 foot masonry fence. It is my understanding that was the original agreement and they were trying to get brick and wood to save money. 2. They agreed to motion detection on 20 ft exterior lights after 9 PM. Great idea and appreciated. 3. They still want to increase medical use from 0% to 50%. 1 have concerns about noise and traffic. I also have concerns about after normal business hours and weekend activity. Can they put a 24 hour medical facility? I would support an increase from 0% to 25% medical if they used the building on the south east comer. But only if they were limited to normal business hours. The developer said that Doctors can use the office space without changing to medical. That really confused me because I thought that is why they were changing from office to medical. If that is true, the 50% they are proposing to be office can be doctors and what will the 50% medical be used for?? 4. They agreed to increase landscape buffer. Which I appreciate. We also discussed last night, they would use 80% evergreen trees to help with the noise in the winter. They said they were using 8-12 ft trees. The fence is 8 ft. They said in 5 years the trees will look like the drawings they Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 11 submitted. I think they should use 10 ft or taller trees to help with the noise now. I don't think we should have to wait 5 years for the trees to grow taller than the fence. I purchased the acre behind the proposal with the full understanding that there was an approved commercial site adjacent to my property. I made the large investment in Southlake because I thought the developer would have to honor the approved site plan. The residents need protection, the problem that the existing approved plan is too expensive to build is an issue the developer should have considered before they bought it. Four years ago i sold my half of Southlake's largest homebuilding company. I understand that things change and I understand business. I don't have the history that some of the other residents have discussed with the multiple changes on this property. They discussed that Calloways was rejected on this property because of traffic, seems like if this plan is approved the traffic would be just as bad as Calloways. We have lived in Grapevine over 20 years and are very excited about building our dream home in Southlake. I want the developer to be successful and I hope that we can all enjoy the great town of Southlake. I appreciate your time and consideration. Felix Blanchard 817-675-2400 Begin forwarded message: Date: August 26, 2014 at 10:19:45 AM CDT Subject: Re: commercial construction site From: Lorne Fletcher <lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us> To: felix Blanchard Mr. Blanchard, We have an application in our office for a rezoning and site plan for that property, however, there has been discussion that they are dropping their proposal and sticking with what was approved years ago. I have not gotten any updates since that conversation. If they do move forward with their application, you will be notified of public hearing dates. The buildings on the old and new site plan are one-story. On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:27 PM, felix Blanchard rote: Lorrie, I own the lot at 915B Emerald Blvd. it looks like there is activity on the commercial tract that backs up to my property. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 12 Can you please update me on what is going on. I have a copy of the approved building layout from several years ago. It has notation on the approved sheets that they are to be one story buildings and I hope that is the case. Thank you Felix Blanchard 817-675-2400 2727 Hidden Lake Dr Grapevine, Tx 76051 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 13 Michael Spinozzi Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM To: hblake@cI.southlake.tx.us Cc: felix Blanchard lisaquinr Michael Spinozzi 7olanda Spinozzi Please forward to the members of the planning and zoning commission. To the members of the Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, am writing you regarding case number ZA14-082 Southlake Villas. My name is Mike Spinozzi and I live at 915A Emerald Blvd. My family has lived at this address for 8years. was involved with the prior plan which was approved in 2007 and modified in 2009. During the review and approval process both the planning and zoning commission and city council were concerned with the amount of traffic and activity that this plan would generate and its subsequent impact on quality of life and property values for the residents of Diamond Circle Estates. The approved plan was 31,000 square feet and estimated to generate 403 vehicle trips per day. The residents were concerned with the density but were assured that these would be low traffic, general offices with 8-5 hours on Monday through Friday. We were also given assurances by the developer that extensive landscaping buffers would be used and a masonry wall would be constructed. This was all acceptable and the plan was approved. As we move to the current proposal it slightly reduces the density but GREATLY INCREASES THE TRAFFIC. The current proposal is estimated to generate 520 vehicle trips per day which is a 29% increase or 117 cars per day. That's a large increase in the amount of activity and noise especially given that the proximity of 6 residential homes.. The driver of the additional traffic is the proposed change to allow medical offices into this development. The developer is proposing that 50% of the development be dedicated to medical offices. The neighborhood is willing to compromise and allow 25% medical offices if they would be designated for building B which is on the southeast part of the lot and it is the building furthest from the residents. Also, if 3 general office buildings and 1 medical office were built the estimated vehicles per day would be 402 which is the SAME AMOUNT IN THE EXISTING PLAN. We believe this is a fair compromise. Further, we would like operating hours to be formally stipulated for this development at 8-5 Monday through Friday. The developer wants the flexibility to market to a broader potential tenant pool (medical community) and the risk of a 7 day a week or even a 24 hour business is very real and quite unacceptable to the neighborhood. There have to be firm , enforceable limits on the activity that is allowed on this property given its proximity to our homes and neighborhood. As you consider balancing the needs of the developer with the needs of the neighborhood please consider the following question: what is the reason for this change? The developer has told us the current plan is economically unviable. Well, he knew this when he bought it. Why should the neighborhood further compromise quality of life and property values to improve the developers economic situation? We certainly don't need more office space or medical office space in our community. We are willing to agree to 1 medical office building and 3 general office with stipulated hours. The developer has also agreed to a masonry 8 foot wall and additional trees as noise and sight buffers. This is appreciated and acceptable. The trees need to be at least 10 feet tall and evergreen. We will be losing several 25 inch oak trees on this property so every effort should be made to landscape the property accordingly. Lights on the property should be motion activated after 9pm. Further, no security cameras should be allowed to preserve our privacy. Thank you for consideration. Sincerely, Mike Spinozzi Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 14 jjm Wed, Nov5, 2014 at 1:18 AM To: Iftetcher@ci.southlake.tx.us, dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: lisaquinn Myname is James Mellingerand I live at 919 Emerald BlvdSouthlake, Texas 76092. 1 am writing inregards to ZA14- 082. 1 was present atthe 10/23/2014 P&Z meeting as well as at a meeting on 11/3/2014 with thedeveloper and the neighboring residents. I will be unable to attend the meetingon 11/6/2014 as I was previously scheduled to be out of town. I would like to record myopposition to therevised plan that is being proposed. Although much progress has been made in making this an acceptabledevelopment it is still contains too much medical square footage, which willcause excessive traffic and noise which is unacceptable. One building of medical use, which was whatwas originally proposed in the August 12, 2014 Spin meeting would bean acceptablecompromise. The developer isconsidering turning off the parking lot light at night and making them motionsensitive, Ithink this should be required. I feel really bad that they cannot save more of the ebsting trees; Ithink they need to be more creative and eliminate or relocate some parking to makethis happen. I am also fearful of anysecurity cameras point at residential properties and think these should not beallowed to protect our privacy. Also Iwould like some assurances as to thegeneral hours of operations of these businesses. I understand the everybusiness has occasional times when some night and weekend work is required but Iwould be opposed to any business located at this development where their normalhours of operation included nights and lorweekends as this would severallyimpact the neighboring residents. Thank You James Mellinger Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 15 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Spinozzi, Michael Etux Yolanda 916 Emerald Blvd Southlake Tx 76092 Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of CIED undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: '%I �, QPJ,flsM�)EVC- 7-eF"6- -r IS '--Pvv L Wrrt-�— �:LiU�i& 4—,iAL-- A)eL--: S A=r 7y -F qw�j . I [MczST C A�� t a3 C c--, M o(sF7 Aj1A-rs rA k-0 Signature: Additional Signature: I S � t �r r w►4�- . Date: Date: Printed Name(s): L(A� a Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA14-082 Page 16 Notification Response Form ZA14-082 Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM Philip, Isaac J Etux Reni J 821 Pearl Dr Southlake Tx 76092 Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: In c S h I w r I I ► '�� `� �-� c w� Q rG6�. I U P,c 1 vi a'o `v ` cam--d s c uvpj ar,' v � U Signature: c,Q) Additional Signature: Spa C �W Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. 1-�00- Date: 2_ Phone Number (optional): g / ? -- 5 5 f —Y 7—S-3 Case No. ZA14-082 Date: ID 2- form per property. Attachment F Page 17 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-542B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3, SITUATED IN THE W.W. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 687, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.887 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having Case No. ZA14-082 a proprietary interest in said property; and Attachment G Page 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other Case No. Attachment G ZA14-082 Page 2 dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 3, situated in the W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687, and being approximately 2.887 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following specific conditions: SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the Case No. ZA14-082 herein changes in zoning. Attachment G Page 3 SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and Case No. Attachment G ZA14-082 Page 4 that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to post the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. Case No. Attachment G ZA14-082 Page 5 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA14-082 Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" Being Tract 3, situated in the W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687, and being approximately 2.887 acres and more fully described as: Case No. Attachment G ZA14-082 Page 7 EXHIBIT "B" APPROVED SITE PLAN APPROVED ELEVATIONS Case No. ZA14-082 Attachment G Page 8