Loading...
Item 6I (2)CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 CASE NO: ZA13-120 PROJECT: Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, Players Circle Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bennet Liu, represented by Dorsett, Swift & Johnson, LLP, is requesting approval of a Site Plan for the development of a 4,171 square foot one story restaurant/office building at 1901 W. Southlake Boulevard on property described as Lot 1 of the Players Circle Addition. SPIN #10. DETAILS: The City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan for the Pavilion at Southlake, now known as Player's Circle, on April 19, 2005. The approved concept plan represented a 3,200 square foot restaurant with a drive through along the east side of the building and 32 parking spaces. The parking provided met the minimum parking ratio required for a restaurant at one (1) space per 100 square feet. The Concept Plan for the overall subdivision included on architectural rendering intended to generally represent the architectural theme of the subdivision. A copy of the approved concept plan and rendering are included in attachment `C' preceding the applicant's proposed site plan. The applicant is proposing the development of a 4,171 square foot one story restaurant/office building with 40 parking spaces at 1901 W. Southlake Boulevard in the Players Circle Addition. The applicant is proposing the uses in the building allow up to a 3,200 square foot restaurant and approximately 971 square foot office space. Parking is provided based on the "floor area by use" allocation of eight (8) spaces for the first 1,000 square feet of professional office floor area and one (1) space per 100 square feet of restaurant floor area. This meets the minimum requirements of the City's parking regulations. The proposed site plan and uses conform to the current zoning and land use designation. However, the proposed 4,171 square foot building area, 40 parking spaces and the 72% impervious coverage of the lot are not consistent with the approved concept plan. The approved concept plan shows a 3,200 square foot restaurant with drive through on the east side of the building, 32 parking spaces with an impervious coverage of 60%. This item was tabled at the October 23, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting following the public hearing and discussion with the applicant regarding the original proposal for a 4,171 sf building with restaurant use and a drive thru. The plan required a minimum of 42 parking spaces but requested a variance to allow only 40. Case No. ZA14-120 At the November 6, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant proposed a revised floor area use for the building by designating a maximum 3,200 sf for restaurant use and 971 square feet for professional office use. This eliminated the previous variance requested for the 2 parking space reduction in the original proposal. The Commission recommended approval, granting the requested variance below. Variances: Driveway Stacking Depth — The common access driveway along the south is expected to have in excess of 49 parking spaces accessing the driveway between this lot and the adjacent lot to the south. A minimum stacking depth of 50 feet is required. A stacking depth of approximately 28 feet is proposed. Case No. ZA14-120 ACTION NEEDED ATTACHMENTS STAFF CONTACT Case No. ZA14-120 Comparison of Approved Concept Plan, Proposed Site Plan and Ordinance 2005 Approved Concept Proposed Players Cirde Ordinance Requirements Plan Lot 1 C-3 district Proposed 4,171 sf Building Roor 3,200 sf Office: 971 sf N/A Area Restaurant: 3,200 sf %Building 10% 13.37% Max 50%of lot area Coverage % Impervious 60% 71.60% 75% Coverage Restaurant: greater of 1 / 100 sf or 1 / 3 seats. Parking 32 40 spaces Office: 8 spaces for 1st 1000 sf 40 spaces required 20' O north; 5' A east; 20' O north; 5' A east; No interior lot No interior lot 20' north; 5' Aeast and Bufferyards bufferyards(south) bufferyards(south) south (ZA05-010 variance) (ZA05-010 variance) Driveway 28 ft. provided; Lots 1/ 2; 28 ft.* 50 ft.; due to increase in Stacking no variance required parking 40 ft. with 10 ft. utility 40 ft. with 10 ft. utility PublicStreet easements on both sides easements on both sides 60 ft. ROW Width of ROW* of ROW (e)isting) *variance requested 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of the proposed site plan. (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No.4, dated October 31, 2014 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses Dennis Killough 817-748-8072 Patty Moos 817-748-8269 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Bennet Liu APPLICANT: Dorsett, Swift & Johnson, LLP PROPERTY SITUATION: 1901 W. Southlake Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Players Circle Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not scheduled for this project. HISTORY: City Council placed the "C-3" zoning on a portion of the property with adoption of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989. On April 19, 2005, City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan and a Preliminary Plat for this and other lots within Players Circle (ZA05-010 and ZA05-011) A Final Plat (ZA05-084) was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission on September 8, 2005 and filed with Tarrant County on March 28, 2006. On February 17, 2009, City Council denied the Site Plan for Lot 1 (ZA07-144). SOUTHLAKE 2030 Pathways Master Plan: A 6' sidewalk currently exists along W. Southlake Boulevard. A four (4) foot sidewalk is proposed along Players Circle adjacent to this site. TREE PRESERVATION: This property is subject to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B. At the time the Concept Plan was submitted and approved for Case ZA05-010, the only quality (protected) trees on the property were located along the east property line and W. Southlake Blvd as shown on the approved Concept Plan included in attachment `C'. Twelve (12) trees exist on site (elm, chinaberry, plum and oak). All, but three (3) trees along the east property line are proposed to be removed with this development. Except for a few voluntary trees that have grown in since the original concept plan was approved, the proposed tree preservation is consistent with the original concept plan. It appears a "good faith" effort has been made. UTILITIES: Water The site will be served by an existing 8-inch water line along Players Circle Sewer This site will be served by an 8-inch sewer line along Players Circle Case No. Attachment A ZA13-120 Page 1 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA13-120 Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) access directly onto Players Circle. This proposed site one common access easement driveway stub outs in to the east property line to allow eventual access back to Peytonville Avenue with future development. Connectivity to Southlake Marketplace is currently provided through two driveways. Players Circle intersects with W. Southlake Boulevard approximately 170 feet to the north of this entry drive. W. Southlake Boulevard is a 7-lane, divided thoroughfare with a continuous landscape median with left -turn lanes. Players Circle is a 2-lane, local commercial street serving the retail development. In the Southlake 2030 Corridor and Urban Design Plan/Median Plan recommends a possible traffic signal at the Players Circle/Meadow Lark intersection as this is a full median opening. Mobility Plan Section MT -24: In addition to limited access for Southlake Marketplace, immediately to the east at Players Circle and Meadowlark there are also some difficulties with traffic access. If the project at Southlake Marketplace is not implemented a traffic signal is recommended to be installed at this location. The City is currently studying the area along FM 1709 from Davis Boulevard to Meadowlark/Players Circle with TxDOT for a future traffic signal. Only one traffic signal will be permitted in this segment. However, a final location for the traffic signal has not been determined at this time. * Based on the 2013 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact Previous Proaosal (10-23-14 P&Z Commission meetina) Restaurant w/Drive —Thru 4,171 sf 2,069 117 112 101 94 (934) Current Proposal 11-6-14 P&Z Commission meetin IN OUT OUT Restaurant w/Drive -Thru 3,200 sf 1,588 89 86 78 72 934 General Office 710 971 sf 1 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 Total 4,171 1 1,599 1 91 1 87 1 79 1 74 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition Attachment A Page 2 UTILITIES: Water The site is served by an existing 8-inch water line in Players Circle. Sewer This is served by an 8-inch sewer line in Players Circle. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: October 23, 2014; Approved (7-0) the motion to table by the applicant to the November 6, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. November 6, 2014; Approved (3-2) subject to the Staff Report, dated October 31, 2014; and subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 31, 2014; and granting the variance request with respect to the stacking depth as presented. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 31, 2014 WCommunity DevelopmentWEMO12013 Cases020 - SP - Players CirclelStaff Report Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment A Page 3 Vicinity Map Players Circle Lot 1 uu 190 190f 211 `' `a o CO r D R 9 CD G y r LYI 0 0 o cn o W d t W ' � Y Q t d 1 T� c,OV'� 1963 70 0 ti a rt Y a 0 a ZA13-120 E Site Plan ,• 5 0 100 200 400 600 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA13-120 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Approved 2005 Concept Plan _• "^s k!�mk'_E7fL7 REM Mir- ' �atet uut+k . 1 JM Mim AM rr - Approved Build Rendering Case No. Attachment C ZA13-120 Page 1 Approved 2005 Concept Plan ]IT¢e SPgcrz l..=" 20 Req. � p 4w SUMARY CHART PER LOT LOIY LOT LOT LOT3 LOT LOTS LOT LOT1 LOTI LOT Lai A=a 0.7 0.6 08 L0 7.6E u6 Total OuOdin ATea (foal riuil 3.200 fi?00 6,270 5,IC0 37,129 0 10,324 Pe;iu Ratio WIN 11260 112W U150 113 seat 0 11150 PuLgSpot Re fired PrwIi d 32 30 32 34 80 V4,O20 64 32 30 32 $1 110 0 Im ervious Covers a 60Y, 67% 62% 60%il% 74% Case No. ZA13-120 COMMIMCM PROPOSM 0 CONCEPT DATA SUMMAKY CHART Zeopg W& ?,.Wed NOTES: c31AO I C Requkedoeeningwells are eisdngtoydtoSFResidenGal. Landus.D,sl-E. RdAc—w - Impervious coverage shall not exceed 75%per lot A—georemjcn la °�? • Resi&0N development resMms shall apply for Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 due Y—b,e ofp osedU, g toprorrmil to SFResidenfi�. Attachment C Page 2 APPLICANT LETTER Dorsett Johnson & Swift, LLP Attorneys and Counselors at Law C. J. de Vilder, Jr. 109 East Third street, Suite 350 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Office: (817) 900-8204 • Fax: (817) 882-8526 cidevilder@dorsettjohnson.com October 30, 2014 City of Southlake Department of Planning & Development Services 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Site Plan Application for 1901 W. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas 76092 To Sir/Madame: Please note that our Site Plan Application is being amended to reflect that 4,171 square foot building will be used as follows: 3,200 square feet for restaurant use 971 square feet for professional office use. As a result of the change in use of the building, the total required parking will be 40 parking spaces (32 for the restaurant and 8 for the professional office). The current plans submitted to the City of Southlake show 40 parking spaces; therefore, we will not be requesting a variance for parking spaces. We will have the site summary charts updated and provided to you as soon as we receive them. Thank you for your attention to this matter and should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (817) 900-8202. Sincerely il C. J. de ilder, Jr. Case No. Attachment C ZA13-120 Page 3 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Yx&Ru 999 GPI Wff-ASW6 Pl SVX31'A1Nnoo iw IC/1 3 .� �16a ow �s xxw ��m,s IZ ate-rar 2te�xe 351YllLlgs doAil*il 519�71'1dOXYI 5110A3✓1IIS Sl XI3090 a [M I �Fd MVA3ln05 3p gg05L XA "NAyl Ng1XX1Y 3l YJ Btl3AYld cm '31Nv11n8NOJ v Stl IFJN3 \I ra r wno�aoaMo3dszan1aa�a I I m i3 o wine iviw ,lm.tid Case No. ZA13-120 A N 4 j A 4 y gg = t e � i f z f 48 ale q pe J g A � i Attachment C Page 4 RENDERED SITE PLAN R-27993T �A�,a ■ Lrt ga65 CU�19Q63' z � - � �Rd �Mas7f•.s�E s015, Y 1 j 61 � ' I 1 I J � � I 1 I 0-12*1 •Ss LAM) Lt++1.n t-rx.oT � 5 CV-11L t t !� 59a 53 4 27 r9* �1 35— ;S S74 LOT r M-M-N crue ivumc 1 ti � Lt15D7Y!' eaa -Au rr. a loon- F-r" ■ L �l L'• liv Ir79 27' L C.�aBh3+L r—S9-ex 5 Ca 79 ua ' i LEGEND sFA [.REEN JUNIPERS ��I LIVE OAK TREE Oft DWF BURFORD HOLLY • � BALLERINA HAWTHORN GULF STREAM NANDINA BALD CYPRESS TREE 0 SEASONAL COLOR I:•:'':•:':I uRIaPE CREPE MYRTLE TREE F40ttiauDA G{tas5 YAUPON HOLLY TREE MULCH OR GRANITE Case No. Attachment C ZA13-120 Page 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN ,ram,,• CDO* O _ _ems - niL*on ACV? �ti . •JhD C1TQ•d 1' f;4 Case No. Attachment C ZA13-120 Page 6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS The building meets vertical and horizontal articulation on all sides North Elevation East Elevation Case No. ZA13-120 FRONT ELEVATION 5CALE:I14 = -o LEFT ELEVATION! Attachment C Page 7 BUILDING ELEVATIONS a� �e �r e: a IRIL ,�+.� _�{ ..�M1 -..rq�r.r�1�.�.:� '.'pif: �,�}{. k:y- wfa .,n }:�.�n...•x-�.i .�r�'..}'...5-:..'T'.y S • k •Y. .�Y' l } n: iiiie 1. 1 �� ,}_^' '�.r 4';b �.,.. .. .�' .. S .� F .� }�: �� �,q 1' Fs�' fir: :-u. ,k. �! � 4 J �:.k e` #u'.: .• �v, �., i�c r:i _. y.r {.._::.a'?.titi.r . r:},'r} '` �1* 'ff'�, ; iiy ' f.:.{��� .. 1. , _y;. .� ., �;y:. `,-•. .'�k"r-nor:*-;i.-� _.. .. - e�';k:. ?:g;". 'r.:.: �., ��. F( REAR ELEVATIQN ,ca,1: w--a SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Case No. ZA13-120 RIGHT ELEVATION 9CALE:114--,'_Cr Attachment C Page 8 EXISTING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View from the North View from the Southwest Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment C Page 9 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA13-120 Review No.: Five Date of Review:11/12/14 Project Name: Site Plan for Players Circle Addition Lot 1 APPLICANT: Ben Liu ENGINEER: JDJR Engineering & Consultants c/o Dorsett Johnson & Swift, LLP James Dewey 500 N. Carroll Avenue, suite 110 2500 Texas Drive, Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Irving, TX 75062 Phone: (817) 900-1712 Phone: (972) 252-5357 Email: Email: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/12/2014 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email: pmoos (a)ci.south lake.tx.us On the Landscape Plan, Sheet 2 of 4: a. Correct the discrepancies between the bufferyard landscape chart on the site plan and the landscape plan. Although the minimum appears to be provided on both plans, there are minor differences. 2. The common driveway along the south is expected to have in excess of 49 parking spaces accessing the driveway which requires a minimum stacking depth of 50 feet. A stacking depth of approximately 28 feet is proposed. (Variance requested) The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a requirement. • A material sample board may more clearly represent the materials being used on the building being proposed. This may be useful during the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and City Council meetings. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartina-ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: This property is subject to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B. At the time the Concept Plan was submitted and approved for Case ZA05-010, the only quality (protected) trees on the property were located along the east property line and W. Southlake Blvd as shown on the Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment D Page 1 approved Concept Plan included in attachment `C'. Twelve (12) trees exist on site (elm, chinaberry, plum and oak). All, but three (3) trees along the east property line are proposed to be removed with this development. One of the trees is located just outside of the boundary of this property. Existing tree credits cannot be taken for a tree that is not on the development site. Except for a few voluntary trees that have grown in since the original concept plan was approved, the proposed tree preservation is consistent with the original concept plan. It appears a "good faith" effort has been made. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Additionally all trees not located in an exempted area must be mitigated. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Remove the existing tree credit summary from the bottom of the Interior Landscape Summary Chart. No trees are being preserved within the interior of the development so no existing tree credits can be taken for required interior landscape trees. 2. The accent tree quantity that is provided in the summary charts does not match the amount of accent trees shown to be planted on the site. The summary charts show that thirty-one (31) accent trees will be planted and only twenty-seven (27) accent trees are shown to be planted across the site. 3. The applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits in the east bufferyard for three (3) trees existing along the east property line. One of these trees is not on the applicant's property and may not count toward existing tree credits to reduce the amount of required bufferyard plantings within the east bufferyard. EXISTING TREE CREDITS: Credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Each lot in the Players Circle development is responsible for handling increased runoff from existing Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment D Page 2 conditions to developed conditions. Describe how increased runoff from site is being handled. This property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction. Structure #19 ($417.61/Ac.) Site = 0.7164 Ac. Fee = $299.18. The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. * A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836. * This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements(a)ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: If the building is classified as an "A2" occupancy with an occupant load in excess of 100 persons, then the building will be required to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system per the 2012 International Fire Code. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes can enter the property and dead-end no further than 150 feet into the property, or an approved turn -around for fire apparatus must be provided. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire hydrant location is satisfactory as shown on the submitted plan. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed near the main entrance to the structure. Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office. General Informational Comments No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan, including monument signs. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment D Page 3 All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS — exterior insulation and finish systems, hardy plank, or other materials) shall not be considered as masonry material. (As amended by Ordinance 480-PPP) Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from any rights -of -way as defined in Section 43.19.d. This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. Rooftop mechanical equipment and / or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from ROW as defined in Section 43.19.d. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. ZA13-120 Attachment D Page 4 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Owner Name Zc)ning 1�� Address ME Acreage Piesponse 1 Myers Meadow Homeowners Assn RPUD 1713 WILD ROSE WAY 4.90 NR 2. Ishan Futures Inc C3 1957 W �THLAKE 0.86 NR 3. Ent in Family Trust C3 1959 W �TM� 1.26 NR 4. 170 Players Uc C3 170 PLAYB:;saR 0.67 NR 5. 8hamsipour, Farid C3 220 PLAYB:;saR 1.10 NR 6. Myers Meadow Homeowners Assn RPUD 100 MEADOWLAWLN 10.78 NR 7. Groves, Fbn D C3 251 PLAYB:;saR 0.97 NR 8. Stampede Properties Lp C3 250 PLAYB:;saR 2.71 NR 9. Yomtoob,Isaac&8hohreh C3 151 PLAYB:;saR 0.69 NR 10. Dlp Ventures C3 201 PLAYB:;saR 0.83 NR 11. Liu, Jason & Bennet & Psyche C3 101 PLAYBRSaR 0.77 NR 12. W & B Kidd Family Ltd Prntshp C2 1963 W �THLAKE 14.12 NR 13. Liu, Jason C3 1901 W �THLAKE 0.77 NR 14. Superintendent of Carroll 18D NR 15. Superintendent of Grapevine NR Colleyville ISD 16. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 17. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR F: In Favor O: Opposed To Notices Sent: Sixteen (16) Responses Received: 0 In Favor: 0 Case No. U: Undecided NR: No Response Opposed: 0 Attachment E Page 1 ZA13-120 Surrounding Property Owner Responses None Received Case No. Attachment F ZA13-120 Page 1