Item 6ACITY OF
S0UTHLA1<,.,E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
September 9, 2014
CASE NO: ZA13-106
PROJECT: Zoning Change & Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Chapel Crossing Medical Ltd., 3L Realty Group, LLC is requesting 2nd
reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza
(formerly called Southlake Medical Plaza) on property described as Tract 6J, Thomas
M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1,
Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
and located at 245 W. State Hwy. 114 and 200 Countryside Ct., Southlake, Texas.
Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-2"
Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 5.
REQUEST
DETAILS: The applicant is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site
Plan for Southlake Office Plaza, from S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District to S-P-2
Generalized Site Plan District. The proposed Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan
allows for the construction of an approximately 51,000 square foot, three-story office
building in the first phase (Site Plan) and Concept Plan approval for a Phase 2
expansion with approximately 23,000 square feet of floor space. The Phase 2
expansion will require City Council approval of a Site Plan (including elevations, a
color -coded Landscape Plan and all other required plans) following a recommendation
by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
The proposed "S-P-2" uses and regulations are based on the "0-1" Office District uses
and regulations with the following exceptions:
Permitted Uses
All uses permitted in the "0-1" Office District to include the following additional use by
right:
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Development Regulations
The development will follow 0-1 regulations with the following exceptions:
1. Current zoning requires 1 space for every 150 square feet for medical office.
The applicant is requesting a reduction to 1 space for every 200 square
feet.
Case No.
ZA13-106
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
2. Building height shall be increased to three stories (The 0-1 Office District
allows a maximum of 2 'h stories).
3. Building height shall be increased to 50' for the building and 60' for the
ornamental features and towers (The 0-1 Office District allows a maximum
height of 35 feet to the predominant parapet wall height and the Zoning
Ordinance allows ornamental features, including the towers, to exceed the
district height by 15' to a maximum height of 50').
The following variances are requested to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended:
Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on local and collector streets. A
variance is requested to allow a commercial driveway onto Countryside Ct.,
which is a local street. (Please note that Countryside Ct. serves primarily non-
residential traffic).
2. Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100' for both driveways. A
variance is requested to allow the stacking depths as shown on the Site Plan
and Concept Plans with approximately 43' of stacking depth shown on the E.
S.H. 114 driveway and approximately 48' of stacking depth shown on the
Countryside Ct. driveway.
A summary of how the S-P-2 regulations and variance requests differ from the City's
Zoning Ordinance requirements for the 0-1 Office District and other City ordinances is
below:
Development Regulation
Proposed "S-P-1"
"0-1" Office District or General
Requirement
Ordinance Requirement
3 stories — 50 feet for
Building Height
building height and 60 feet
2% stories or 35 feet
for ornamental features
(towers)
As �I,e..,A 0A the ele.0;4tMaAr
Meets articulation
[a..a.Je Ie.�.�,+L..�. more than +i.�.e�
-2
the building height ,ithei-+. r+ical
requirements
affce+ at Ieac+ 1 COL of the building
Parking
1 space / 200 sf for the site
1 space / 150 sf medical
as a whole
1 space / 300 sf general office
29 .. erl parking
Removed all covered spaces
Approval of a Sperifin Use Permit
mellows up to G. erl spares O' x 29
Tree Preservation
Approximately 53.41 %
70% per Tree Preservation Ordinance
Driveway Stacking Depth
43 feet on E. S.H 114 and 48
Minimum of 100 feet on both drives
feet on Countryside Ct.
Commercial driveway
No commercial driveway on local
Driveway on Local Street
allowed onto Countryside Ct.
streets unless the site has no other
access
At their August 19, 2014 meeting, City Council approved the item at first reading
Case No.
ZA13-106
with the stipulation that the applicant would submit revised plans at 2nd reading to
address the following issues.
1. Revise the elevations consistent with Council's comments and provide
possible alternatives for building elevations noting that there will not be any
articulation variances included therein.
2. Consider a revised site plan that will include less impervious coverage.
3. Redesign the carports to possibly be incorporated into the building design to
reduce their visual impact from White Chapel Blvd. and to be fewer in
number.
4. Provide alternative vehicular access through the project from Countryside
Ct. along the western boundary to 114.
5. Work with Council members to revise the landscaping plan.
6. Address current and "new" street capacity and timeline concerns.
7. Provide more detail and scope and hardscape alternatives which could also
include water features for the hard corner of N. White Chapel and S.H.114,
8. Move the trash enclosure and equipment yard or screen them better.
9. No ambulance or emergency room will be allowed.
The applicant presented conceptual plans at the September 2, 2014 meeting to
receive additional direction from City Council. The following changes have been made
to the plans to address feedback from City Council at the August 19, 2014 and
September 2, 2014 meetings:
1. No covered parking will be provided in any phase.
2. A corner feature element has been added with the Southlake logo, tilted to
face the corner of SH 114 and White Chapel.
3. Significant landscape changes have been made along White Chapel and
screening for building services.
4. All canopy trees to be provided are 4" caliper.
5. Landscaping has been provided on the pad for the future expansion (Three
4" caliper Chinkapin Oaks have been provided on three corners of the
Phase 2 lot).
6. Building elevations have been adjusted to address building presence at 114
and at grade.
7. Building articulation on all facades complies with ordinance requirements.
8. Building materials have been adjusted.
9. Grading plan has been adjusted for landscape design at the corner of S.H.
114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.
10. Detailed landscape renderings have been provided from at grade levels of
White Chapel, SH114, and Countryside Court.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2"d reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
SPIN Meeting Reports dated October 14, 2013 and May 13, 2014
(D)
Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint presentation
(E)
Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 8, 2014
(F)
Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G)
Ordinance No. 480-667
(H)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067
Case No.
ZA13-106
Richard Schell (817)748-8602
Case No.
ZA13-106
-Tet•1"fell :tell]ki11l1ki170]N►yi/elIEel ki
OWNER: Chapel Crossing Medical Ltd.
APPLICANT: 3L Realty Group LLC
PROPERTY LOCATION: 245 W. State Hwy. 114 and 200 Countryside Ct., generally located at the
southwest corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION: Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial
Cfl� NNElli�w11ke7i101E �o0we aIT--M GX 11101 i_ %I"M b]niiC•Ii
REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: - A Final Plat was approved in January 1988.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN
-"C-1" zoning was placed on the southern portion of the property with the
adoption of Ordinance No. 480, in September 1989.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA07-005) from "AG" Agricultural District
and "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan
District with "C-3" district uses for Chapel Crossing Shopping Centerto develop
5 buildings totaling approximately 45,000 square feet of retail floor area was
approved August 7, 2007.
Consolidated Land Use Plan
The underlying land use designation of this property is "Retail Commercial".
The proposed office development is consistent with the recommended scope
of uses under the "Retail Commercial" land use designation.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows 8' multi -use trails
planned along the south side of E. S.H. 114 and along the west side of N.
White Chapel Blvd. These trails are shown on the proposed plans. Five (5) foot
sidewalks are required along all adjacent public streets with all developments
requiring a City Council approved site plan. The required 5' sidewalk is shown
on the plans along the north side of Countryside Ct.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan & Median Plan
Adequate right of way is shown on the Site Plan and Concept Plans for E. S.H.
114, N. White Chapel Blvd. and Countryside Ct. A driveway onto N. White
Chapel Blvd. is not permitted by Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended,
since the minimum distance along the roadway from a commercial driveway to
Case No. Attachment A
ZA13-106 Page 1
an intersection cannot be met. An access permit from TxDOT will be required
prior to construction of the driveway on E. S.H. 114.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Please see the Conclusions section of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) dated
July 7, 2014 included in Attachment D of this report. Public Works will be
prepared to make a presentation on the results of the TIA to City Council.
TREE PRESERVATION: Approximately 35.69% of the existing tree canopy is shown to be preserved on
the Tree Preservation Plan. Since the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting on July 17, 2014, the applicant has revised the parking layout on the
Phase 2 Concept Plan to save the 30" Post Oak that is shown in yellow as
marginal. A review comment has been added to revise the Tree Conservation
Plan to show that tree in green as saved and to revise the percentage of
existing tree canopy to be preserved to 53.41 %. If the requested zoning was
for a straight zoning change instead of S-P-2, Generalized Site Plan district,
70% of the existing tree canopy would be required to be preserved. For
property sought to be zoned S-P-2, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: SPIN meetings for this project were held by the applicant on October 14, 2013
and May 13, 2014. The SPIN Reports are included as Attachment C of this
Staff Report.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: July 17, 2014; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated July 11, 2014,
subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 11, 2014, specifically
approving the variances requested in the staff report dated July 11, 2014, and
specifically noting the approval of Option "A" with the motion and the
disallowance of Option "B" with the motion, also noting the applicant's
willingness to work with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the
deceleration lane onto Countryside Ct. up to City standards and further noting
the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far timing and what would
be required for a left turn lane on northbound White Chapel Blvd., referring to
striping and asphalt as staff has presented it.
CITY COUNCIL: August 5, 2014; The item was tabled on consent to the August 21, 2014
meeting.
August 19, 2014; Approved at 1st reading (6-1) pursuant to Site Plan Review
Summary No. 4, dated August 13, 2014, noting the following comments with
the motion, the applicant will revise the elevations consistent with Council's
comments and provide possible alternatives for building elevations noting that
there will not be any articulation variances included therein, noting that a
revised site plan will be considered that will include less impervious coverage,
noting that the carports as noted on the site plan to be twenty will be
redesigned as such to be incorporated possibly into the building design to
reduce their visual impact from White Chapel Blvd. and to be fewer in number,
noting that it will be the responsibility of the applicant to provide escrow funds
for a deceleration lane and work with staff to come up with a development plan
to construct same in connection with the White Chapel widening project, noting
that the applicant will provide right of way frontage for the White Chapel
Case No. Attachment A
ZA13-106 Page 2
widening project, noting that the revised site plan will include alternative
vehicular access through the project from Countryside Ct. along the western
boundary to 114, noting that the applicant will work with Council members to
include a revised landscaping plan, noting that more detail and scope and
hardscape alternatives which could also include water features to be included
on the hard corner of White Chapel and 114, approving the driveway stacking
variance and also the driveway on a local street, and incorporating Planning
and Zoning's comments from the prior motion and recommendation to Council.
September 2, 2014; The item was tabled to the September 16, 2014 meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 8, 2014.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA13-106 Page 3
Vicinity Map
Southlake Office Plaza
Z 181
180
1BU
[O 1
W 1
d
o Q
o =
m U
W
2 =
,P 70
93.
Z
5�q 0
FOX GLENN02 °0
509 507 505 you 790
S03
�40
rOO
DSO
9
Rp � 702p
J 5A N X Sh,, 2y0
1 3y 1515
�4
S
�O o_
q2 �
O
4`'S 330
41> 415 385 335
101 2
E N
250 GO�C1 201 141 101 3p1 3
7
3 251 121 8
w
0 340 1360 n�
1320 1310
0
is
220 Highland
N
� N
A
498 -T1
N
w E
ZA13-106
s Zoning Change and
Concept/Site Plan
f�
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA13-106 Page 1
0 SOUTHLAK-E
CASE NO.
PROJECT NAME:
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION:
SPIN MEETING REPORT
ZA13-106
Southlake Medical Offices
SPIN # 5
October 14, 2013: 6:00 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3A— 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Eight (8)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry # 7
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Scott Asbury, 3L Realty Group LLC and Dr. Sanders
• STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Richard Schell, Planner II: (817)748-8602 or rschell(d)ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
• The property is located at the southwest corner of SH 114 and North White Chapel Blvd.
Development Details
• Zoning change and site plan for a 2-phase development. Phase 1 includes an orthopedic
surgeon's office, a 20,000 square foot building on 3 acres of the 6.2 acre site.
• The balance of the property will be presented in conceptual form and return for site plan
approval at a future date. It is anticipated to include three smaller 1-story buildings.
The plan presented at SPIN:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 1
v
ilPf4�Air, _
F,
OVA
Preliminary Elevations
1M:iFWJ "444
QUESTIONS/CONCERNS
• Is the retention pond there now?
o There will not be a retention pond, there will be a detention pond. It will not hold
water at a constant.
• The roofs look flat. Is that normal?
o We recognize we may need to change it up. The equipment is on the roof; we will
need to pitch it or put parapets walls up.
• Is this what you would build everywhere?
o This is a high level project.
• This is special to Southlake?
o Yes, more arch features, masonry and glass.
The back of the building is visible from SH 114. It looks pretty plain.
o Yes, we may need to add more arches and definitely need some windows.
• Will there be a lot of tree removal?
o No
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 2
• What is the separation between the church and the building?
The church has landscaping and there are some existing trees that will be
preserved.
• This is a signature corner and needs to look special.
• Is there sever?
Yes
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council_
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 3
1; SOUTHLAK.-E
CASE NO.
PROJECT NAME:
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION
SPIN MEETING REPORT
ZA13-106
Southlake Medical
SPIN # 5
May 13, 2014: 6:00 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake. TX
City Council Chambers
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirty-seven (37)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: David Alexander and Monique Schill
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Scott Asbury (214) 566-8699
• STAFF PRESENT: Patty Moos, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Patty Moos. Planner I: (817)748-8269 or pmoos(u-)ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation:
• Located at the southwest corner of SH114 and N. White Chapel Boulevard
Development Details:
• Three story medical and office building constructed of masonry, stucco and stone
• White Chapel Boulevard to be widened with median at the intersection with SH114
• Future options include two with main building with building expansion and main building
with separate building on the ,vest side of the property.
• Landscaping will meet the Southlake requirements
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 4
Presented at SPIN:
r)avalnnmant Plan With Fxnnncinn [7ntinn 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 5
SOUTH ELE'':',--",Tl0N
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS:
• There is a detention area near the Countryside church entrance, what will this look like?
o We will work with the church to make it look attractive.
• Will there be a fence along the west property line where there are several large trees?
o We will have a fence and will work around the trees and work with the church.
• For the option with the building proposed on the west property line, what will be there
until the area is developed?
o Grass will be installed on the northwest corner until the future development
occurs.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 6
• The north building elevation has a canopy, will there be a canopy on the south
elevation?
c No, only on the north elevation.
• There will be a screen wall for the roof equipment.
• Will be any work at this time on the west property line?
o Not at this time.
• What will be the impact of the development on the existing church sign?
o We will work with the church to keep the sign looking nice.
Meeting ended: 7:50 pm
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made, Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-106 Page 7
ZONING NARRATIVE AND
PROPOSED S-P-2 REGULATIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS
September 8, 2014
Ken Baker, Director
Planning & Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street
Southlake, TX 76092
Re: Cover Letter/Project Description, Southlake Office Plaza
Dear Mr. Baker:
We are respectfully requesting approval of our concept and site plan for the submittal for
Lot 1, Block A of the Ravenaux Village Addition and Part of the Thomas M Hood survey,
abstract number 706, tract 6J. The roughly 6.2 acre property is currently zoned S-P-2
(generalized site plan district) and is located along the southwest corner of North White
Chapel Blvd. & Northwest Parkway (frontage of S.H.1 14).
As part of this request we would like to propose the following:
The current phase will be a 51,000 square foot three story office building.
Two options are available for expansion use, which will be limited to either
medical office or office space: a three-story addition to the current office
building, or a stand-alone office building. Both scenarios are shown in the
architectural site plan. Final square footage will be dictated by parking and
use.
A dumpster enclosure will be screened per code to match the proposed
building's fagade.
Landscaping per code current city requirement and tree conservation as
required.
The requested zoning is S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District and the development will
follow the 0-1 Office District uses with the following additional uses by right:
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Additionally, the development will follow 0-1 regulations with the following exceptions:
Current zoning requires 1 space for every 150 square feet for medical office
and 1 space for every 300 square feet for office. We are requesting a
development requirement of 1 space for every 200 square feet.
Building height shall be increased to three stories
Maximum predominant building height (actual) shall be increased to 50'-0"
and ornamental elements increased to 60'-0".
The Following Variances are also requested:
A driveway entrance on Countryside Court (a local street)
A reduction of required stacking depth to the dimension provided on the civil
drawings.
City of Southlake Case No. ZA13-106
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-106 Page 1
Since the first reading at City Council, we have made the following changes:
l . No covered parking will be provided in any phase.
2. A corner feature element has been added with the Southlake logo, tilted to face
the corner of SH 114 and White Chapel.
3. Significant landscape changes have been made along White Chapel and
screening for building services.
4. Landscaping has been provided on the pad for the future expansion.
5. Building elevations have been adjusted to address building presence at 1 14 and
at grade.
6. Building materials have been adjusted.
7. Grading plan has adjusted for landscape design.
8. Detailed landscape renderings have been provided from at grade levels of White
Chapel, SH 114, and Countryside Court.
Thank you for your time and attention. Please feel free to contact us if you have any
additional questions or comment.
Sincerely,
Tyler Adams, AIA
Greenlight
City of Southlake Case No. ZA13-106
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-106 Page 2
—w
\
L . BSJ el'
CM - 651-.�
pl eRG — S 03' E
3aa
�
I \ r
9
\\
A
�I
�l
s
PHASE 1 SITE PLAN
PROP. 11
AgNG
THRE
OFFICE BUILD
eLro t5 51,000 SOFT.
:evg eiii: WHEIGHT
R—D FIRE
HYDRANT
8
.—LI
RYDRANT
- �e2.er rD zae':
L - 205.45' en a. a � PROP 5 WE
C1l 20195' dILIRGH DRIVE CHAPEL 9�, W
O1L erro. .. FASTING Elt6
\ l
HNG
S rn" W FERE
"roRANT A"* Countryside Court
DP.
5' ME - _ mR E.xuEv- �xE
SIX—
/
,h II I
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-106 Page 3
SUMMARY OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
(DATED JULY 8, 2014)
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Southlake Office Plaza is expected to generate 19.3 trips during the AM peak and
270 trips during the PM peak. The Carillon development is expected to add 950 trips during the
AM peak and 1,947 trips during the PM peak, and is more significant than the Southlake Office
Plaza site in creating congestion within the study area. The following improvements within the
study area are suggested to be constructed by the Southlake Office Plaza developer:
�o Construct a southbound right turn lane from White Chapel Boulevard onto Countryside
Court. Due to the relatively short distance between Countryside Court and the SH 114
eastbound frontage road (approximately 300') the length of the right turn lane should
extend the entire distance of the link.
❖ Construct a 100' northbound left turn lane with 50' taper from White Chapel Boulevard
to westbound Countryside Court. The design should match the current plans for this
lane in the City's project for widening White Chapel Blvd.
❖ In lieu of constructing the above -mentioned northbound left turn lane as a "hooded"
left turn lane in the interim condition prior to White Chapel Blvd. widening to five lanes,
provide a temporary refuge area with two-way center left turn lane striping in the
median just north of the intersection with Countryside Court. The refuge area should be
at least 10 ft wide for a distance of at least 100 ft north of the intersection to allow for
staging of two -stage left turns from Countryside Court.
It is also noted that a variance will be required from TxDOT to construct the Southlake Office
Plaza driveway along the SH 114 eastbound frontage road.
The following improvements in the study area are suggested for implementation by the City or
other developers:
❖ Install a two-phase traffic signal at the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard and
Highland Street. This would greatly improve level of service for north/southbound
traffic at this intersection until the planned two-lane roundabout can be constructed.
•:• Add a lane to the westbound approach of the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard
and the SH 114 westbound frontage road, and change that intersection's phasing to a
four -phase diamond. This would especially improve performance of the westbound left -
turn movement at that intersection.
:• Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Kirkwood Boulevard and White Chapel
Boulevard. This would decrease delay for side -street traffic at the intersection, which is
expected to grow as the Carillon development builds out. This improvement will be
more practical if — according to Southlake's master thoroughfare plan — Kirkwood
Boulevard is expanded to a four -lane divided arterial that continues westward from the
intersection.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-106 Page 5
:a►C•af�eTi Kai [1I:
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Review No.: Five
Project Name: Zoning Change Concept/Site Plan — Southlake Office Plaza
APPLICANT: Scott Asbury
3L Realty Group LLC
13155 Noel Rd. #900
Dallas, TX 75240
Phone: (214) 566-8699
E-mail: sasbury@3Lrealtygroup.com
Date of Review: 09/08/14
OWNER: Dr. Steve Sanders
Chapel Crossing Medical, Ltd.
1440 Eagle Bend
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (972) 839-3777
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
09/05/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
A Plat Revision that complies with the underlying zoning regulations and concept/site plans must be
processed and recorded at Tarrant County prior to issuance of a building permit.
Right of way dedication for a deceleration lane on southbound N. White Chapel Blvd. at the
intersection with Countryside Ct. will be required with the approval of the Plat Revision. The City will
install the deceleration lane with planned improvements to N. White Chapel Blvd. The Planning and
Zoning Commission motion at their July 17, 2014 meeting noted the applicant's willingness to work
with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the deceleration lane onto Countryside Ct. The
P&Z motion also noted the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far timing and what would
be required for a left turn lane on northbound White Chapel Blvd. If the proposed office building is
completed prior to the City completing improvements to N. White Chapel Blvd., the applicant would be
required to install striping and asphalt for the left turn lane.
3. The Texas State Code requires ambulatory surgery centers to have a covered area for passenger
drop off and a generator. The proposed future mechanical yard would screen the required generator.
A canopy cover for the drop off area is shown on the elevations, but if the canopy cover is not
adequate to meet the State Code, approval of a site plan may be required to extend the canopy.
4. Please make the following changes to the Concept Plan (Sheet G101):
a. Revise the boundaries and right of way dedication to match the Site Plan.
b. Revise the symbols on the drainage easement that included the detention pond to match the
easement as shown on the Site Plan.
5. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The following changes are needed:
a. Driveways do not meet the minimum stacking depth of 100'. Approximately 43' of stacking is
provided on SH114 and approximately 47' of stacking is provided on Countryside Ct. Please
revise the stacking dimension and label on the Countryside Ct. drive to the first turning
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 1
movement as it is dimensioned on the S.H. 114 drive. A variance has been requested to allow
the stacking depth as it is shown on the plans.
6. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended
and the Master Pathways Plan. The required 8' multi -use trails are shown along E. S.H. 114 and N.
White Chapel Blvd. and the required 5' sidewalk is shown along Countryside Ct. The Subdivision
Ordinance requires sidewalks to be located at least 2' from back of curb, but staff recommends
locating the sidewalks at least 4' from back of curb for more efficient irrigation of the turf area between
the sidewalk and the curb. If the sidewalks or trails cannot be located entirely in the right of way,
provide pedestrian access easements where the sidewalks cross private property.
7. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
8. Provide architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures. For property within the
Corridor Overlay Zone provide elevation plans with dimensions showing building height, wall height,
wall lengths, dimensions of horizontal and vertical articulation, and the type of exterior construction
material. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a
is required on proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements
of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the
building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential.
a. Dimension the building height to the tops of the parapet walls and architectural features.
b. Provide an east elevation that shows the future mechanical yard with screening.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
Approximately 53.41 % of the existing tree canopy is proposed to be preserved. If the requested zoning
was for a straight zoning change instead of S-P-2, Generalized Site Plan district, 70% of the existing
tree canopy would be required to be preserved. For property sought to be zoned S-P-2, the City
Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the
application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City
Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for
the:
placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 2
creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to the Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
There are four (4) existing trees in the southwest corner of the development proposed to be
preserved. Two (2) are in a parking island and the other two (2) are in a parking island and bufferyard
area. On the Grading Plan approximately two feet (2') of grade cut is proposed within the critical root
zone area of these trees. Please ensure that the site grading conforms to the proposed tree
preservation as shown on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan.
3. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D, a Tree
Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the
percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree
permit (an approved Tree Conservation Plan) related to development, the percentage of existing tree
cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
No comments
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
The "Required" interior landscape area calculations in the Interior Landscape Summary Chart on
Sheet L-2 and on the Site Plan, do not match the required landscape calculations for the Phase 1 Site
Plan or the Phase 2 Concept Plan. The "Required" interior landscape area should be calculated for the
proposed Phase 1 of the development (8,808 sq.ft.); and there should be additional Interior Landscape
Summary Charts provided for Phase 2 (12,450 sq.ft.) The required interior landscaping shown is
12,750 square feet, which is close to the required interior landscaping area for the Phase 2 Concept
Plan.
All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of at least one (1) canopy tree
with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses. seasonal color, or a
combination of these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable. The canopy trees and accent trees
are provided but the other plant materials are not.
3. When parking is provided between the right-of-way and the building set back line, a solid evergreen
hedgerow of plants obtaining a mature height greater than three feet (3') shall be planted. When
planted, this hedge shall be a minimum of two feet (2') in height and planted no further than thirty
inches (30") on center.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 3
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Provide preliminary water, sewer, drainage and grading plans for this development.
3. Show proposed sidewalks on the plans.
4. Construction within SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application
prior to site plan approval.
5. Label curb return radius for the proposed drive. Curb return radii for driveways shall be 30' minimum.
6. Fire lane radii shall be 30' minimum.
7. Dimension the proposed drives. Refer to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 for design criteria.
Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in
the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
ImreF_]Ell ►YilEll kIII &I
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15'
minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
2. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added
to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a
person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to,
Section 11.086, Texas Water Code.
3. A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
4. Civil construction plans shall include plan sheets for pre -construction, post -construction and
permanent erosion control measures and stabilization.
Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 4
waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City
standards.
WATER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for water lines is 8".
2. Waterline shall be looped or extended to property line.
3. Clearly label all public and private lines.
4. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2" blow -off per the City's details.
5. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300' maximum for non -
sprinkled buildings or 600' for sprinkled buildings.
Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed
before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary
sewer system built to City standards.
2. Clearly label all public and private sanitary sewer lines.
3. Sanitary sewer to the property will be required due to proximity of less than 100' to existing manhole
on X Street. Provide field investigation to determine if property will be able to connect to the existing
manhole.
4. Extend sanitary sewer to the future expansion and northwest property line and provide sewer stub to
adjacent property.
Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement.
2. Clearly label all private and public storm lines.
3. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s).
Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100- year storm events.
Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased
runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention
ponds.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 5
4. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be
installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm
sewer:
30" RCP and under - 15' easement
42" — 54" RCP - 20' easement
60" — 66" RCP - 25' easement
72" — 102" RCP - 30' easement
Over 102" RCP — 3.5 times diameter
5. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site/concept/development
plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to
the concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council.
6. Proposed driveway culvert must be sized by an engineer and submitted for approval to the City
Engineer.
* Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
The proposed flume will not be allowed.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #9 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction ($278.14/Acre).
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
1k1;101N M UIEelk/_1 W6191M IMIMIkIII &I
* Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans
shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are
located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/en ink eeringdesign.asp
Submit with Civil Construction Plans
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on SH 114. Permit approval is required
before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must
be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for
consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 6
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements(cD-ci.southlake.tx.us
CrlEll kIEllZU Wd9]JiIJilEll kIII &I
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (per 2012
I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road,
Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599.
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main,
the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check
is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser.
Fire Department sprinkler connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a
30 degree down elbow and a Knox locking cap.
Fire Department sprinkler connections must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet
of Fire Lane access.(FDC location not indicated on the drawing)
All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed.
Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of sprinkled
buildings. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet
wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 80,000 pounds
GVW)
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius.
(per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely
sprinkled buildings.
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
817-748-8607
pkaokci. southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further
details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 7
park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees in the
amount of $2400 per gross acre x 6.2 acres= $14,880 will be required. Fees will be collected with the
approved developer's agreement.
Other informational comments?
General Informational Comments
A SPIN meeting was held May, 13, 2014. A SPIN meeting was held October 14, 2013 for a previous
submittal of this project.
The future expansion or separate office building will be required to comply with all requirements in
Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones, including articulation requriements.
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. Metal halide lighting is
prohibited by the Lighting Ordinance.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation
plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
A permit from TxDOT must be obtained for the driveway along SH 114.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-106 Page 8
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Southlake Office Plaza
f W 1700 N Carroll �11p1 0o N n
= PP��Pp1P
a 270
9S Z 1633 w
502 2p4 0 1629
FOX GLENN 1625
11 509 507 505 1
S y0^ �90 611 4p0
03 7q0 1613 31 6
166 5
�00 160130,
2S0
2
�q O
��0 152p N X Siy7 24
1 �5 1515 14
512 S
00 0
5 92 2qS
O
A6 330
471 415 385 335
01 2
200 V
E CT S�
7
3 50 G0
UN"�R01 141 101 307 3 9
51 7
c"n 33S
4
.1340 1360
M N
N
1320 1310
SPO #
1.
Owner
Hines Southlake Land Lp
Zoning
ECZ
Property Address
100 E State Hwy 114
Acreage
5.06
Response
NR
2.
Zvonecek, Brian
C2
190 W State Hwy 114
1.50
F
3.
Cloninger & Moore Lp
C2
W State Hwy 114
0.58
NR
4.
Cloninger & Moore Lp
C2
200 W State Hwy 114
0.27
NR
5.
Hopkins Dallas Properties Ltd
C2
W State Hwy 114
0.85
F
6.
Dominion Southlake Properties
C3
N White Chapel Blvd
0.40
NR
7.
Dominion Southlake Properties
AG
N White Chapel Blvd
0.90
NR
8.
Dominion Southlake Properties
C3
N White Chapel Blvd
6.33
NR
9.
Countryside Court Llc
SP1
101 Countryside Ct
2.40
NR
10.
Tew Investments Llc
SP1
141 Countryside Ct
2.40
NR
11.
Cullum Chalk & McCain Real Est
SP1
121 Countryside Ct
2.40
NR
12.
Eagle Unlimited Ltd
SP1
201 Countryside Ct
2.40
NR
13.
Countryside Bible Church
SP1
250 Countryside Ct
13.56
U
14.
Greenway-White Chapel Lp
SP2
W State Hwy 114
3.59
F
15.
Greenway-White Chapel Lp
SP2
Countryside Ct
2.57
F
16.
Southlake, City Of
AG
301 W State Hwy 114
2.75
NR
17.
International Ch Four Square G
SP1
251 Countryside Ct
3.85
NR
18.
Countryside Bible Church
SP2
201 Countryside Ct
6.13
U
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Eighteen (18)
Responses Received: Four (4) - Three (3) in favor and one undecided
Case No. Attachment F
ZA13-106 Page 1
Notification Response Form
ZA73-106
Meeting Date: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Greenway-White Chapel Lp
2808 Fairmount 5t Ste 100
Dallas Tx 75201
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of)
f opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline fine)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature:
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s):
Must be property owner(s) who
Phone Number (optional):
Date: O
Date:
canta:t the Plannirig Department. One form per property.
Case No.
ZA13-106
Attachment F
Page 2
day, 13. R14 1:HFV TXI=
Notification Response Form
ZA13-106
Meeting Date., M2y 22, 2014 at 6.30 PM
Zvonecok, Briar
Pa Box 93654
Southl2ke Tx 76692
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
_ n
Signature:
Additional Sig
Printed Name(s): _ S�
Must be =perty owners} whose rtame{a are .printed tik tip...
Phone Number (optional)_ &4-L _ 2 �'9�5
Date: ff-lzeK
Date:
Case No. Attachment F
ZA13-106 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZA13-106
Meeting Date: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Hopkins Dallas Properties Ltd
7995 LBJ Fwy Ste 250
Dallas Tx 75251
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property s❑ noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature:
Additional Signature:
Date: ��-
Date:
Printed Name(s): /=A ce 564'!; A -; V/6-7 v x- 6.1,9
Must be property owner(s) whose names} are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Plannirg Department. One Mrm per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA13-106 Page 4
Notification Response Form
ZA13-106
fleeting Date: May 22, 2014 at 6_30 PM
Countryside Bibie Church
250 Countryside Ct
Southlake Tx 76092
#6eumkk Sk Sw 310
snillh� Tx 76M
1Fla� �'l7�7�6-1�1TI
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undeci�about
(,circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
.a�.� ' �s« .;,i„i. ■. "� ram_ r •l, ' r' � :•r+
r
6 �w � 4G /W 6,aa
Signature: _ w Date:�a-!
Additional Signature:
Date:
Printed Name(s)- tAy4pj �_hj)%4.A t.. �+
Must be p]rcperty nwner(s) r4hpsa name(s) are printed at lop. 011tiernise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional): '� 130"
Case No. Attachment F
ZA13-106 Page 5
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-667
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 6J,
THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOT 1, BLOCK A,
RAVENAUX VILLAGE, AN ADDITION TO CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.14
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT
TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B",
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S-P-2" Generalized
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 1
Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 2
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition
to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 6.14 acres, and
more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan
District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 3
Plan and Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and
subject to the following conditions:
Planning and Zoning Commission motion from the July 17, 2014 meeting:
Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated July 11, 2014, subject to Site Plan Review
Summary No. 3, dated July 11, 2014, specifically approving the variances requested in the
staff report dated July 11, 2014, and specifically noting the approval of Option "A" with the
motion and the disallowance of Option "B" with the motion, also noting the applicant's
willingness to work with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the deceleration
lane onto Countryside Ct. up to City standards and further noting the applicant's willingness
to work with the City as far timing and what would be required for a left turn lane on
northbound White Chapel Blvd., referring to striping and asphalt as staff has presented it.
City Council 1s' reading motion from the August 19, 2014 meeting:
Approved at 1s' reading (6-1) pursuant to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August
13, 2014, noting the following comments with the motion, the applicant will revise the
elevations consistent with Council's comments and provide possible alternatives for building
elevations noting that there will not be any articulation variances included therein, noting
that a revised site plan will be considered that will include less impervious coverage, noting
that the carports as noted on the site plan to be twenty will be redesigned as such to be
incorporated possibly into the building design to reduce their visual impact from White
Chapel Blvd. and to be fewer in number, noting that it will be the responsibility of the
applicant to provide escrow funds for a deceleration lane and work with staff to come up with
a development plan to construct same in connection with the White Chapel widening
project, noting that the applicant will provide right of way frontage for the White Chapel
widening project, noting that the revised site plan will include alternative vehicular access
through the project from Countryside Ct. along the western boundary to 114, noting that the
applicant will work with Council members to include a revised landscaping plan, noting that
more detail and scope and hardscape alternatives which could also include water features
to be included on the hard corner of White Chapel and 114, approving the driveway
stacking variance and also the driveway on a local street, and incorporating Planning and
Zoning's comments from the prior motion and recommendation to Council.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 4
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 5
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 191" day of August, 2014.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2014.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, being approximately 6.14 acres, and more fully and completely described below:
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No.
ZA13-106
Attachment G
Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for approved site plan and concept plan
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-106 Page 9