Loading...
Item 7A . L 7 A • Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT August 19, 2014 CASE NO: ZA13 -106 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Chapel Crossing Medical Ltd., 3L Realty Group, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza (formerly called Southlake Medical Plaza) on property described as Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 245 W. State Hwy. 114 and 200 Countryside Ct., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District. Requested Zoning: "S- P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 5. REQUEST DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza, from S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District to S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District. The proposed Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan allows for the construction of an approximately 51,000 square foot, three -story office building in the first phase (Site Plan) and Concept Plan approval for a Phase 2 expansion with approximately 23,000 square feet of floor space. At the July 17, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant also presented an Option "B" Concept Plan, which proposed a separate single story office building with approximately 18,600 square feet of floor space instead of the expansion of the Phase 1 three -story office building. The Planning and Zoning Commission specifically disallowed the Option "B" Concept Plan, so the applicant has dropped that option from consideration by City Council. The Phase 2 expansion will require City Council approval of a Site Plan (including elevations, a color -coded Landscape Plan and all other required plans) following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed "S -P -2" uses and regulations are based on the "0-1" Office District uses and regulations with the following exceptions: Case No. ZA13 -106 • • y t Permitted Uses All uses permitted in the "0-1" Office District to include the following additional use by right: 1. Ambulatory Surgery Center Development Requlations The development will follow 0-1 regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Current zoning requires 1 space for every 150 square feet for medical office. The applicant is requesting a reduction to 1 space for every 200 square feet. 2. Building height shall be increased to three stories (The 0-1 Office District allows a maximum of 2 1 /2 stories). 3. Vertical articulation on the south facade is permitted as shown on the elevations. 4. Building height shall be increased to 60' (The 0-1 Office District allows a maximum height of 35 feet). 5. Covered parking for physicians (20 spaces) as indicated on the drawings. VARIANCES REQUESTED: The following variances are requested to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended: 1. Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on local and collector streets. A variance is requested to allow a commercial driveway onto Countryside Ct., which is a local street. (Please note that Countryside Ct. serves primarily non- residential traffic). 2. Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100' for both driveways. A variance is requested to allow the stacking depths as shown on the Site Plan and Concept Plans with approximately 43' of stacking depth shown on the E. S.H. 114 driveway and approximately 48' of stacking depth shown on the Countryside Ct. driveway. A summary of how the S -P -2 regulations and variance requests differ from the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements for the 0-1 Office District and other City ordinances is below: Case No. ZA13 -106 Development Regulation Proposed "S -P -1" "0-1" Office District or General Requirement Ordinance Requirement Building Height 2'/2 stories or 35 feet 3 stories or 60 feet Facade length no more than 3 times Vertical Articulation As shown on the elevations the building height without vertical offset at least 15% of the building height Parking 1 space / 200 sf for the site 1 space / 150 sf medical as a whole 1 space / 300 sf general office Approval of a Specific Use Permit 20 covered parking spaces allows up to 6 covered spaces 9' x 20' Covered Parking 8 x 20' (more if not visible from public right of way or single family residential property) Tree Preservation Approximately 53.41 % 70% Driveway Stacking Depth 43 feet on E. S.H 114 and 48 Minimum of 100 feet on both drives y g p feet on Countryside Ct. Commercial driveway No commercial driveway on local Driveway on Local Street allowed streets unless the site has no other access ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1 reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) SPIN Meeting Reports dated October 14, 2013 and May 13, 2014 (D) Plans and Support Information (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 13, 2014 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480 -667 (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748 -8072 Richard Schell (817)748 -8602 Case No. ZA13 -106 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Chapel Crossing Medical Ltd. APPLICANT: 3L Realty Group LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 245 W. State Hwy. 114 and 200 Countryside Ct., generally located at the southwest corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District REQUESTED ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY: - A Final Plat was approved in January 1988. - "C -1" zoning was placed on the southern portion of the property with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480, in September 1989. - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA07 -005) from "AG" Agricultural District and "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C -3" district uses for Chapel Crossing Shopping Center to develop 5 buildings totaling approximately 45,000 square feet of retail floor area was approved August 7, 2007. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN Consolidated Land Use Plan The underlying land use designation of this property is "Retail Commercial ". The proposed office development is consistent with the recommended scope of uses under the "Retail Commercial" land use designation. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows 8' multi -use trails planned along the south side of E. S.H. 114 and along the west side of N. White Chapel Blvd. These trails are shown on the proposed plans. Five (5) foot sidewalks are required along all adjacent public streets with all developments requiring a City Council approved site plan. The required 5' sidewalk is shown on the plans along the north side of Countryside Ct. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan & Median Plan Adequate right of way is shown on the Site Plan and Concept Plans for E. S.H. 114, N. White Chapel Blvd. and Countryside Ct. A driveway onto N. White Chapel Blvd. is not permitted by Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Case No. Attachment A ZA13 -106 Page 1 since the minimum distance along the roadway from a commercial driveway to an intersection cannot be met. An access permit from TxDOT will be required prior to construction of the driveway on E. S.H. 114. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Please see the Conclusions section of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) dated July 7, 2014 included in Attachment D of this report. Public Works will be prepared to make a presentation on the results of the TIA to City Council. TREE PRESERVATION: Approximately 35.69% of the existing tree canopy is shown to be preserved on the Tree Preservation Plan. Since the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on July 17, 2014, the applicant has revised the parking layout on the Phase 2 Concept Plan to save the 30" Post Oak that is shown in yellow as marginal. A review comment has been added to revise the Tree Conservation Plan to show that tree in green as saved and to revise the percentage of existing tree canopy to be preserved to 53.41 %. If the requested zoning was for a straight zoning change instead of S -P -2, Generalized Site Plan district, 70% of the existing tree canopy would be required to be preserved. For property sought to be zoned S -P -2, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: SPIN meetings for this project were held by the applicant on October 14, 2013 and May 13, 2014. The SPIN Reports are included as Attachment C of this Staff Report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: July 17, 2014; Approved (6 -0) subject to the staff report dated July 11, 2014, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 11, 2014, specifically approving the variances requested in the staff report dated July 11, 2014, and specifically noting the approval of Option "A" with the motion and the disallowance of Option "B" with the motion, also noting the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the deceleration lane onto Countryside Ct. up to City standards and further noting the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far timing and what would be required for a left turn lane on northbound White Chapel Blvd., referring to striping and asphalt as staff has presented it. CITY COUNCIL: August 5, 2014; the item was tabled on consent to the August 21, 2014 meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 13, 2014. Case No. Attachment A ZA13 -106 Page 2 Vicinity Map Southlake Office Plaza \ I Z 0 C CCI J a 1 o = 1 0 co U W H 2 X96 270 FOX GLENN 200 - 509 507 505 y o 1 90 50 3 14 0 10 0 25 0 19 0 0 1520 X S y 71 2q, 1 1515 4 S o 42 ';,, 3' , 330 4174'f. 415 385 335 101 A, .•yw 250 GO ,v, 20, 141 101 307 3, 251 ' 121 \ O 0 ° 1340 1360 w N (h 1320 _ 1310 o 0 a N 220 Highland N Ln 498 � I N T'•. \' ti •`• R E 1 ��� ZA13 -106 l4,' s y Zoning Change and .-- I. A a .. ;ras, Concept /Site Plan 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet' i Case No. Attachment B ZA13 -106 Page 1 SOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA13 -106 PROJECT NAME: Southlake Medical Offices SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 5 MEETING DATE: October 14, 2013; 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A— 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Eight (8) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry # 7 • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Scott Asbury, 3L Realty Group LLC and Dr. Sanders • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Richard Schell, Planner II: (817)748 -8602 or rschell @ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located at the southwest corner of SH 114 and North White Chapel Blvd. Development Details • Zoning change and site plan for a 2 -phase development. Phase 1 includes an orthopedic surgeon's office, a 20,000 square foot building on 3 acres of the 6.2 acre site. • The balance of the property will be presented in conceptual form and return for site plan approval at a future date. It is anticipated to include three smaller 1 -story buildings. The plan presented at SPIN: Case No. Attachment C ZA13 -106 Page 1 A /$ / Preliminary Elevations r .. I I I l . ., QUESTIONS / CONCERNS • Is the retention pond there now? o There will not be a retention pond, there will be a detention pond. It will not hold water at a constant. • The roofs look flat. Is that normal? o We recognize we may need to change it up. The equipment is on the roof; we will need to pitch it or put parapets walls up. • Is this what you would build everywhere? o This is a high level project. • This is special to Southlake? o Yes, more arch features, masonry and glass. • The back of the building is visible from SH 114. It looks pretty plain. o Yes, we may need to add more arches and definitely need some windows. • Will there be a lot of tree removal? o No Case No. Attachment C ZA13 -106 Page 2 • What is the separation between the church and the building? o The church has landscaping and there are some existing trees that will be preserved. • This is a signature corner and needs to look special. • Is there sewer? o Yes SPIN Meng Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Repressartatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the pubic of the issues and questions raised by residents and The general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA13 -106 Page 3 4 io si� �1ii '- M� : :, 4 '-'4; . ..;;..„ i 4.6 se a' Irj lint, A -._ - 00e."3�C - - - ¶ "%1 y .....;.,e... _ ir l _ f - NORTH ELEVATION • 01 _ a , I _____ I _ Mil MOM a 'y SOUTH ELEVATION QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: • There is a detention area near the Countryside church entrance, what will this look like? o We will work with the church to make it look attractive. • Will there be a fence along the west property line where there are several large trees? o We will have a fence and will work around the trees and work with the church. • For the option with the building proposed on the west property line, what will be there until the area is developed? o Grass will be installed on the northwest corner until the future development occurs. Case No. Attachment C ZA13 -106 Page 6 • The north building elevation has a canopy, will there be a canopy on the south elevation? o No, only on the north elevation. • There will be a screen wall for the roof equipment. • Will be any work at this time on the west property line? o Not at this time. • What will be the impact of the development on the existing church sign? o We will work with the church to keep the sign looking nice. Meeting ended: 7:50 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA13 -106 Page 7 ZONING NARRATIVE AND PROPOSED S -P -1 REGULATIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS August 19, 2014 Ken Baker, Director Planning & Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Cover Letter /Project Description, Southlake Office Plaza Dear Mr. Baker: We are respectfully requesting approval of our concept and site plan for the submittal for Lot 1, Block A of the Ravenaux Village Addition and Part of the Thomas M Hood survey, abstract number 706, tract 6J. The roughly 6.2 acre property is currently zoned S -P -2 (generalized site plan district) and is located along the southwest corner of North White Chapel Blvd. & Northwest Parkway (frontage of S.H.1 14). As part of this request we would like to propose the following: 1. The current phase will be a 51,000 square foot three story office building. 2. Two options are available for expansion use, which will be limited to either medical office or office space: a three -story addition to the current office building, or a stand -alone office building. Both scenarios are shown in the architectural site plan. Final square footage will be dictated by parking and use. 3. A dumpster enclosure will be screened per code to match the proposed building's facade. 4. Landscaping per code current city requirement and tree conservation as required. The requested zoning is S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District and the development will follow the 0-1 Office District uses with the following additional uses by right: 1. Ambulatory Surgery Center Additionally, the development will follow 0-1 regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Current zoning requires 1 space for every 150 square feet for medical office and 1 space for every 300 square feet for office. We are requesting a development requirement of 1 space for every 200 square feet. 2. Building height shall be increased to three stories 3. Building height (actual) shall be increased to 60' -0 ". 4. Covered parking (20) as indicated on the drawings. 5. The vertical articulation on the south side of the building is allowed as shown on the elevations. The Following Variances are also requested: 1. A driveway entrance on Countryside Court (a local street) 2. A reduction of required stacking depth to the dimension provided on the civil drawings. City of Southlake Case No. ZA13 -106 Case No. Attachment D ZA13 -106 Page 1 Since the submission to P&Z, we have made the following changes: 1. The parking lot for the future expansion has been revised to change the status of the large oak tree from marginal to preserved, Thank you for your time and attention. Please feel free to contact us if you have any additional questions or comment. Sincerely, Tyler Adams, AIA Greenlight City of Southlake Case No. ZA13 -106 Case No. Attachment D ZA13 -106 Page 2 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN s e - ORm•,, 77 - 57.0.,0 a. - ssrar n , � l p er ` c b ,,,c, l I acJ: C EXPANSION 1 ___ 6 / '.. v ° of t/ --- THREE . Rr • / - - I T .. ° o / OFFICE BU / 4' - 0.4, \ I i e, ° °^ �- - - G.,EO s is. 5 ,.000 SO.7 ' \ i - - - 1 s uo ar wniER'cawEnl SP HEIGHT R rc i = ie i 1 " - -- -- 1 = - = l s> I /7-,),, o, '__ WM.': % ©-__ = - t; \ \� f - II V¢ _" - - -- ' \ :P•41#0 ante203.11100119SenwZMVERTO ..r. • - ` ` 0 �. c _ w irv c _ c , ..".1 . - - -_ . I i I .3 - 1 o.z •� \/ ' E____ �' x.,11 z2c � - 1 / \\ \_� _ e o vG .-aA. ❑ 1. �ocmniarci �ocr+� -\ \ oNSf(E Zan_ __I.,ii _ - - - • ' W \ \OErprioIpr _ __ -, _ __ _ __ - Zr:: E- _ I "1 ic•. I s Q {� e __ - - -- 7at°� x ' L R-Y'M•O. ML ,_ .i.. _ ICI rrY „� R =M3.6T 5 :71 7.7 - - - -- _ _- _ - c V C tRI VE I tell • —tea Cx. - �•! - - - _ — - Hnia4r HWH OuI C E_ E _ i 5IDE*. ' cH Ors. - s MT! 20 . � _- _ E . Countryside Court E .t. ` „. FIR . E. ssw A6 y E..sa.� .u. wery w mu ermoum n.03-7. •sm TStixl w7,,," .atv= I °..� wo nemvmss. ^.... s.. 1 '" • -• " Case No. Attachment D ZA13 -106 Page 3 CONCEPT PLAN WITH PHASE 2 EXPANSION rr • 4 �'`�N. .: � q 2S LANDSCAPE SUFFER ALONG a P -Hi \ 17� 3o BUILD NGS_-TBACN 1 , 'g' ti 77 FUTURE FARB NG AREA . i tr* ' Pi 1 11 0 li PI' � � � - CROSS Par- �+oEko srmzE;ANe �„ : e Bes s: • � . ' �� DECORATIVE SWARDS 0 + + + + • OO 01+,, 4 � .f.4, `` �. �sL ` U ♦ « e � LOFT; 5 PACE. � O iip. [�) �[ r�aa e AT 1@GllC �' 10 4 p PY A 9 0 V E • �0 �'A•�,\ • • • '.w■ « •� ++ • FR_'VIO FIB COFPLE c S « a a I U • v \ ' 0 / • ` ``. \ / ` 0* COVERED PARKNG - +� '�. ' E + • + • S Q �o� - O��a�� o - _ . NA ND t .' 0 _ ,YARD i: / O, I .„ 25%IDLOADNGS,/ Q ■ i �e ;�w 0 0od � `� ,a te ��, « ►� `` } t n ,„,,. e � . • 1� ~ •` + ' 'a� . 3P 3U lDIkG SE -3?Ck • 1 1 °F ���f�f�feN��e if L� -gip — : : ' ' . ' . ' • its A 1 `. \ = t •e•Ne• • a .'.' 4 1 .rn•N �N•N. ' ou.1. : sicLDwR� • u /c •//i gee•••. • `'i�� / � , ~ • ! •W0 70'R `` * `•`•`+ • APE • - oiin .• list. VNN. + + + �! SUFFER iS:ANx a.cNG } 1•.e /l . �,e•••• ' .. .• • \�, + /V riNIT<CNAFEL I'D S.P••. �:: a ° °�° ••N Rf•M•f.•••N•N•111f1 N•N• �N••. NM•fN••N•NNNI•l /L .1 ••• / 00.•.•:• ii i 13'3J LOMG SETBACK iM.�.•.0 t «::d �•NNN••N•�auNNi -.u•. - - �N••• I 5' SICE YARD LANDSCAPING SUFFER ♦••t••Nr.;UF� \ \ AAi.liO Ai.'�" '� �tPNOSCAPE BUFFER ALONG COUN CWRT :OUm N➢F. RNnn+G3l1TURE TEAL E% =NS ON i~ +••.. � —"loot �ERSNIC , r °^ Countryside Court HONEYCOMB PATIMIN DEMO A DE -CE POND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROG, IIORTN TRUENCRTN 1 Concept Plan Case No. Attachment D ZA13 -106 Page 4 SUMMARY OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DATED JULY 8, 2014) CONCLUSIONS The proposed Southlake Office Plaza is expected to generate 193 trips during the AM peak and 270 trips during the PM peak. The Carillon development is expected to add 950 trips during the AM peak and 1,947 trips during the PM peak, and is more significant than the Southlake Office Plaza site in creating congestion within the study area. The following improvements within the study area are suggested to be constructed by the Southlake Office Plaza developer: • Construct a southbound right turn lane from White Chapel Boulevard onto Countryside Court. Due to the relatively short distance between Countryside Court and the SH 114 eastbound frontage road (approximately 300') the length of the right turn lane should extend the entire distance of the link. • Construct a 100' northbound left turn lane with 50' taper from White Chapel Boulevard to westbound Countryside Court. The design should match the current plans for this lane in the City's project for widening White Chapel Blvd. • In lieu of constructing the above - mentioned northbound left turn lane as a "hooded" left turn lane in the interim condition prior to White Chapel Blvd. widening to five lanes, provide a temporary refuge area with two -way center left turn lane striping in the median just north of the intersection with Countryside Court. The refuge area should be at least 10 ft wide for a distance of at least 100 ft north of the intersection to allow for staging of two -stage left turns from Countryside Court. It is also noted that a variance will be required from TxDOT to construct the Southlake Office Plaza driveway along the SH 114 eastbound frontage road. The following improvements in the study area are suggested for implementation by the City or other developers: + Install a two -phase traffic signal at the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard and Highland Street. This would greatly improve level of service for north /southbound traffic at this intersection until the planned two -lane roundabout can be constructed. + Add a lane to the westbound approach of the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard and the SH 114 westbound frontage road, and change that intersection's phasing to a four -phase diamond. This would especially improve performance of the westbound left - turn movement at that intersection. + Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Kirkwood Boulevard and White Chapel Boulevard. This would decrease delay for side - street traffic at the intersection, which is expected to grow as the Carillon development builds out. This improvement will be more practical if — according to Southlake's master thoroughfare plan — Kirkwood Boulevard is expanded to a four -lane divided arterial that continues westward from the intersection. Case No. Attachment D ZA13 -106 Page 5 CONCEPT /SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA13 -106 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 08/13/14 Project Name: Zoning Change Concept/Site Plan — Southlake Office Plaza APPLICANT: Scott Asbury OWNER: Dr. Steve Sanders 3L Realty Group LLC Chapel Crossing Medical, Ltd. 13155 Noel Rd. #900 1440 Eagle Bend Dallas, TX 75240 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (214) 566 -8699 Phone: (972) 839 -3777 E -mail: sasbury@3Lrealtygroup.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/04/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602. 1. A Plat Revision that complies with the underlying zoning regulations and concept/site plans must be processed and recorded at Tarrant County prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Right of way dedication for a deceleration lane on southbound N. White Chapel Blvd. at the intersection with Countryside Ct. will be required with the approval of the Plat Revision. The City will install the deceleration lane with planned improvements to N. White Chapel Blvd. The Planning and Zoning Commission motion at their July 17, 2014 meeting noted the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the deceleration lane onto Countryside Ct. The P &Z motion also noted the applicant's willingness to work with the City as far timing and what would be required for a left turn lane on northbound White Chapel Blvd. If the proposed office building is completed prior to the City completing improvements to N. White Chapel Blvd., the applicant would be required to install striping and asphalt for the left turn lane. 3. The Texas State Code requires ambulatory surgery centers to have a covered area for passenger drop off and a generator. The proposed future mechanical yard would screen the required generator. A canopy cover for the drop off area is shown on the elevations, but if the canopy cover is not adequate to meet the State Code, approval of a site plan may be required to extend the canopy. 4. Provide a color coded Tree Preservation Plan and change the 30" Post Oak designated in yellow as "Marginal" to green to show the tree as "Saved" per the revised narrative and S -P -2 regulations dated August 4, 2014, which states that the parking lot layout has been revised to save the 30" Post Oak. 5. Please make the following changes to the Concept Plan (Sheet G101): a. Revise the boundaries and right of way dedication to match the Site Plan. b. Revise the symbols on the drainage easement that included the detention pond to match the easement as shown on the Site Plan. 6. All driveways /points of ingess /egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The following changes are needed: Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 1 a. Driveways do not meet the minimum stacking depth of 100'. Approximately 43' of stacking is provided on SH114 and approximately 47' of stacking is provided on Countryside Ct. Please revise the stacking dimension and label on the Countryside Ct. drive to the first turning movement as it is dimensioned on the S.H. 114 drive. A variance has been requested to allow the stacking depth as it is shown on the plans. 7. Provide sidewalks and /or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The required 8' multi -use trails are shown along E. S.H. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. and the required 5' sidewalk is shown along Countryside Ct. The Subdivision Ordinance requires sidewalks to be located at least 2' from back of curb, but staff recommends locating the sidewalks at least 4' from back of curb for more efficient irrigation of the turf area between the sidewalk and the curb. If the sidewalks or trails cannot be located entirely in the right of way, provide pedestrian access easements where the sidewalks cross private property. 8. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. 9. Provide architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures. For property within the Corridor Overlay Zone provide elevation plans with dimensions showing building height, wall height, wall lengths, dimensions of horizontal and vertical articulation, and the type of exterior construction material. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a is required on proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and /or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. a. Dimension the building height to the tops of the parapet walls and architectural features. b. Provide an east elevation that shows the future mechanical yard with screening. c. Dimension the elevations of the covered parking structures with the height to the bottom of the cover and the overall height. Tree Conservation /Landscape Review E -mail: kmartin @ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748 -8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Approximately 53.41% of the existing tree canopy is proposed to be preserved once the 30" post oak that is shown as "Marginal" is changed to "To be Saved" per the statement added to the narrative and S -P -2 regulations dated August 4, 2014. If the requested zoning was for a straight zoning change instead of S -P -2, Generalized Site Plan district, 70% of the existing tree canopy would be required to be preserved. For property sought to be zoned S -P -2, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 2 ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man -made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. There are four (4) existing trees in the southwest corner of the development proposed to be preserved. Two (2) are in a parking island and the other two (2) are in a parking island and bufferyard area. On the Grading Plan approximately two feet (2') of grade cut is proposed within the critical root zone area of these trees. Please ensure that the site grading conforms to the proposed tree preservation as shown on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan. 3. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -D, a Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit (an approved Tree Conservation Plan) related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1. No comments LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The "Required" interior landscape area calculations in the Interior Landscape Summary Chart on Sheet L -2 and on the Site Plan, do not match the required landscape calculations for the Phase 1 Site Plan or the Phase 2 Concept Plan. The "Required" interior landscape area should be calculated for the proposed Phase 1 of the development (8,808 sq.ft.); and there should be additional Interior Landscape Summary Charts provided for Phase 2 (12,450 sq.ft.) The required interior landscaping shown is 12,750 square feet, which is close to the required interior landscaping area for the Phase 2 Concept Plan. 2. All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of at least one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses. seasonal color, or a Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 3 combination of these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable. The canopy trees and accent trees are provided but the other plant materials are not. 3. When parking is provided between the right -of -way and the building set back line, a solid evergreen hedgerow of plants obtaining a mature height greater than three feet (3') shall be planted. When planted, this hedge shall be a minimum of two feet (2') in height and planted no further than thirty inches (30 ") on center. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works /Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748 -8101 E -mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Provide preliminary water, sewer, drainage and grading plans for this development. 3. Show proposed sidewalks on the plans. 4. Construction within SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. 5. Label curb return radius for the proposed drive. Curb return radii for driveways shall be 30' minimum. 6. Fire lane radii shall be 30' minimum. 7. Dimension the proposed drives. Refer to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 for design criteria. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR /ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://vvww.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 4 2. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. 3. A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. 4. Civil construction plans shall include plan sheets for pre- construction, post- construction and permanent erosion control measures and stabilization. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: 1. Minimum size for water lines is 8 ". 2. Waterline shall be looped or extended to property line. 3. Clearly label all public and private lines. 4. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2" blow -off per the City's details. 5. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300' maximum for non - sprinkled buildings or 600' for sprinkled buildings. • Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. • The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. • Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. • Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8 ". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards. 2. Clearly label all public and private sanitary sewer lines. 3. Sanitary sewer to the property will be required due to proximity of less than 100' to existing manhole on X Street. Provide field investigation to determine if property will be able to connect to the existing manhole. 4. Extend sanitary sewer to the future expansion and northwest property line and provide sewer stub to adjacent property. • Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 5 1. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement. 2. Clearly label all private and public storm lines. 3. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 4. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30" RCP and under - 15' easement 42" — 54" RCP - 20' easement 60" — 66" RCP - 25' easement 72" — 102" RCP - 30' easement Over 102" RCP — 3.5 times diameter 5. Verify size, shape, and /or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site /concept/development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and /or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the concept/site /development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 6. Proposed driveway culvert must be sized by an engineer and submitted for approval to the City Engineer. Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. • Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #9 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($278.14/Acre). Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22 "x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http: / /www.cityofsouthlake.com/Public Works /engineeringdesign. asp • Submit with Civil Construction Plans • Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. • A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 -8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 6 * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *= Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748 -8671 E -mail: kclements(c�ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214 - 638 -7599. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. Fire Department sprinkler connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a 30 degree down elbow and a Knox locking cap. Fire Department sprinkler connections must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of Fire Lane access.(FDC location not indicated on the drawing) All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed. Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all- weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 80,000 pounds GVW) Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely sprinkled buildings. Community Service /Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 7 817- 748 -8607 pkao(aci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land /park dedication requirements: Non - residential developments must provide dedicated parks and /or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every fifty (50) non - residential gross acres of development. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non - residential park dedication fees in the amount of $2400 per gross acre x 6.2 acres= $14,880 will be required. Fees will be collected with the approved developer's agreement. Other informational comments? General Informational Comments • A SPIN meeting was held May, 13, 2014. A SPIN meeting was held October 14, 2013 for a previous submittal of this project. The future expansion or separate office building will be required to comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones, including articulation requriements. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. • All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. Metal halide lighting is prohibited by the Lighting Ordinance. • All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • A permit from TxDOT must be obtained for the driveway along SH 114. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA13 -106 Page 8 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Southlake Office Plaza \ 1700N Carroll � >.. �_ I ii-r5, lAp1A x Sys 2'0 z! Z � �I 1 o 8 FOX GLENN '' = le 511 509 507 505 4 /90 ��p 503 �' /.70 f�'•• V 74 to 79 20G 290 v12 y �o ft/ , N' X S y 7 2 ., lq 1515 512 5 420 24s % 413/4 330 417 415 385 335 101 200 m T S h 'L ' co pli i 141 101 ao7 51 379 2 33s 1340 1380 N F, ' Ir/ 1320 1310 I I I § I SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 1. Hines Southlake Land Lp ECZ 100 E State Hwy 114 5.06 NR 2. Zvonecek, Brian C2 190 W State Hwy 114 1.50 F 3. Cloninger & Moore Lp C2 W State Hwy 114 0.58 NR 4. Cloninger & Moore Lp C2 200 W State Hwy 114 0.27 NR 5. Hopkins Dallas Properties Ltd C2 W State Hwy 114 0.85 F 6. Dominion Southlake Properties C3 N White Chapel Blvd 0.40 NR 7. Dominion Southlake Properties AG N White Chapel Blvd 0.90 NR 8. Dominion Southlake Properties C3 N White Chapel Blvd 6.33 NR 9. Countryside Court Llc SP1 101 Countryside Ct 2.40 NR 10. Tew Investments LIc SP1 141 Countryside Ct 2.40 NR 11. Cullum Chalk & McCain Real Est SP1 121 Countryside Ct 2.40 NR 12. Eagle Unlimited Ltd SP1 201 Countryside Ct 2.40 NR 13. Countryside Bible Church SP1 250 Countryside Ct 13.56 U 14. Greenway -White Chapel Lp SP2 W State Hwy 114 3.59 F 15. Greenway -White Chapel Lp SP2 Countryside Ct 2.57 F 16. Southlake, City Of AG 301 W State Hwy 114 2.75 NR 17. International Ch Four Square G SP1 251 Countryside Ct 3.85 NR 18. Countryside Bible Church SP2 201 Countryside Ct 6.13 U Responses: F: In Favor 0: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Eighteen (18) Responses Received: Four (4) - Three (3) in favor and one undecided Case No. Attachment F ZA13 -106 Page 1 Notification Response Form ZA13 -106 Meeting Data: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM Greenway White Chapel 2808 Fairmount St Ste 100 Dallas Tx 76201 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby i n favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: i / 9 / Date: ers �7 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): : . Must be property owner(s) whose s } are E� name( at top• 1 • - contact the Planning Department. One form per property Phone Number (optional): ("x 14-1 € f) Case No. Attachment F Page 2 ZA13 -106 May. 13. 2014 3:30PM TXIE No. 9615 P. 1 Notification Response Form ZA13 -106 Meeting Dais: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM Zvoneoek, Brian Po Box 93434 Sougrake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the pr party so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above, Space for comments roegarding yourr .. a tdes tyyte,. l ueve pe.• at, MIA /A tbAs ort pl Signature: Date: f //K Additional Signatu - Dom Printed Name(s): Af-n1 q\Alizet4 i .e!?•.piairy!.nWr in gritted at a.taetaeltl,. pepwt [— One- S owupeF a e,t. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA13 -106 Page 3 Notification Response Form ZA13 -106 Meeting Date: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM Hopkins Dallas Properties Ltd 7995 LBJ Fwy Ste 250 Dallas Tx 75251 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: � u5e. Signature: Date: r/«-/tv Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 5 V/ c G.A Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One forth per property Phone Number (optional): 2 R/ 33 '/ - vPf/ Case No. Attachment F ZA13 -106 Page 4 Notification Response Form iiiiiiisposises log ZAt 3-106 : 91490e :'• Meeting Date: May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM - • flibilibeittaarlispinsailkosissa oRaimpsivia Countryside Bible Church 141B5 tip 31$ 250 Countryside Ct 1'X ,7th Southiake Tx 76092 itasiFill7F49401121 • 7F • PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecid d about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ,t GA* otridt 4v tki. C/Ad k . 66 e- -- , # per -- tao). 14R host . &► / psi G AvAftatr. 'Kt 4r * 041 CAmearir:it. (mar\ Signature: 134y, C L(& Date: 5-•24-Pf Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 111440/ e. tti. k . �r�.'ISi1 Must be property own (s) whose name(*) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Pig Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ?i ta- la/ Case No. Attachment F ZA13 -106 Page 5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -667 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 6J, THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOT 1, BLOCK A, RAVENAUX VILLAGE, AN ADDITION TO CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.14 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S -P -2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO "S -P -2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 6.14 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site Plan and Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B ", and subject to the following conditions: 1. Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 3 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 4 ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 5 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 reading the day of , 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2 reading the day of , 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" Being described as Tract 6J, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 1, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 6.14 acres, and more fully and completely described below: Reserved for metes and bounds description Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 7 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved site plan and concept plan Case No. Attachment G ZA13 -106 Page 8