Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item 6C
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT May 14, 2014 CASE NO: ZA14-037 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Site Plan for Park Village EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Woodmont Land Company is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan to revise the approved Landscape Plan for Park Village on property described Tracts 4, 4D and 4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; and located at 1001 E. Southlake Blvd. and 400 and 430 S. Carroll Ave, Southlake, Texas. The current zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. The proposed zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 9. REQUEST DETAILS: City Council approved a Zoning Change and Site Plan for the Park Village development on October 15, 2013 to allow construction of approximately 196,000 square feet of retail and restaurant development on approximately 22.48 acres at the southwest corner of E. Southlake Blvd. and S. Carroll Ave. Construction is underway on the project. A portion of the property that is south of the future Zena Rucker Rd. is being developed as a retention pond and open space area. The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan to revise the approved Landscape Plan for Park Village. Approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan is required to revise the approved Landscape Plan since the plan was approved as a part of the "S-P-1" - Detailed Site Plan District zoning. No other changes to the approved Zoning and Site Plan or conditions of approval are being requested. A letter from the applicant summarizing the intent of the proposed revisions to the Landscape Plan is included in Attachment C of this report. The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of canopy and accent trees from the number of trees on the approved plan. The number of shrubs to be provided remains unchanged from the approved plan. For 1st reading at City Council, the applicant submitted the Landscape Plan that was presented to the P&Z Commission at the April 17, 2014 meeting that provided 248 canopy trees and 376 accent trees and an alternate plan that provided 248 canopy trees and 442 accent trees and that met the minimum requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. The Landscape Ordinance does not allow plantings otherthan grasses and groundcover to be located closer than 8' from the back of curb for plantings in the public right of way. Approval of a variance to the Landscape Ordinance Section 8.01 is required to allow some of the additional 66 accent trees to be placed as shown on the alternate Landscape Plan. Case No. ZA14-037 The chart below compared the number of trees provided on the originally approved plan, the plan presented to the P&Z Commission on April 17, 2014 and the alternate Landscape Plan submitted for 1st reading at City Council that met the minimum requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. Approved Proposed Alternate Difference Landscape Difference Difference 10/15/13 4/17/14 Plan (Approved — Ordinance (Proposed (Alternate P&Z Proposed Proposed Requirement 4/17/14 P&Z — 5/06/14 CC — 5/06/14 5/06/14) Required) Required) Canopy 330 248 248 -82 248 0 0 Trees Accent 489 376 442 -47 442 -66 0 Trees On May 6, 2014, City Council approved the item at 1st reading (6-0) subject to landscape plan review summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014; approval for alternative landscape plan which shows compliance with the City's landscape ordinances with the exception of allowing and approving the variance to include up to 66 of the canopy trees within the eight -foot buffer and noting that the caliper inches will be the four -inch variety at a minimum of 75% of those canopy trees and 25% for the two-inch caliper requirement; in the event the trees are located within the eight -foot buffer zone they will be maintained to a seven -foot clear height along the sidewalks and 14-foot height along the roadway; noting that any vision or sight triangles located within the project will remain un-obscured; and subject to all other requirements that the zoning for this applicant will remain intact. The Landscape Plan that was originally approved plan on October 15, 2013 and the Alternate Plan that was presented to City Council at 1st reading provided 4" caliper canopy trees for 100% of the canopy trees, which exceeded the requirement in the Landscape Ordinance that 50% of the canopy trees be a minimum 2" caliper and 50% be a minimum 4" caliper. The Landscape Ordinance requires accent trees to be a minimum of 6' in height. The Landscape Plan that was originally approved October 15, 2013 showed Crape Myrtles and Desert Willows at an 8'-10' minimum height and Chaste trees at a minimum of 6'- 8' in height. All subsequent plans, including the alternate plan that was approved by City Council at first reading, have shown the Crape Myrtles at a minimum height of 8'- 10' and the rest of the accent trees at a minimum height of 6'-8' with the exception of an additional species here and there that were shown at a minimum height of 8'-10' as the plans have been revised up to this point. The alternate landscape plan that was approved at first reading also includes additional hardscape improvements extending from the "Village" area. The materials proposed to be used in the added hardscape area include all the materials originally approved for the "Village" and "Rim" areas. VARIANCE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to Landscape Ordinance No. 544, as amended, Section 8.01 to allow some of the additional 66 accent trees to be placed closer than 8' from the back of curb for plantings in the public right of way as shown on the alternate Landscape Plan should City Council prefer the alternate Landscape Plan that meets the minimum requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing Case No. ZA14-037 2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Landscape Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (F) Ordinance No. 480-643a (G) Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA14-037 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Excel Southlake, LP APPLICANT: Woodmont Land Company PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1001 E. Southlake Blvd. and 400 and 430 S. Carroll Ave. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 4, 4D and 4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District HISTORY: - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA08-059) from "AG" Agricultural District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses and regulations for The Plaza on Southlake Blvd. was approved by City Council on December 2, 2008. The site plan for the property, which is located at 1001 E. Southlake Blvd., includes nine one-story retail and office buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA12-090) from "AG" Agricultural District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for Southlake Park Village that included approximately 217,000 square feet of retail development and a parking garage was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 8, 2012 and approved by City Council at 1s` reading December 4, 2012. The case was withdrawn prior to a 2nd reading at Council. - A Preliminary Plat (ZA12-091) for Southlake Park Village was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 8, 2012. The case was withdrawn before moving forward to City Council. - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA13-060) from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District and "AG" Agricultural District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District for Park Village was approved October 15, 2013. - A Preliminary Plat (ZA13-061) for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Park Village was approved October 15, 2013. - A Final Plat (ZA13-119) Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Park Village was approved November 7, 2013. This property is included in the Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan. The following recommendation from the plan pertains to tree plantings along Zena Rucker Rd. Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment A Page 1 Urban Design Recommend a parkway buffer and trees adjacent to Rucker Road. TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Conservation Plan that was approved by City Council October 15, 2013 shows approximately 1.0% of the existing tree canopy be preserved. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for the Park Village Development was held by the applicant on April 8, 2013. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: April 3, 2014; A motion to table the item to the April 17, 2014 meeting was approved (6-0). April 17, 2014; Approved (4-0) subject to the Landscape Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014, further subject to the staff report dated April 11, 2014, and noting the applicant's willingness to provide an alternate Landscape Plan that would meet the Landscape Ordinance and take into account use of the 8' buffer zone from the curb. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 2014; Approved at 1st reading (6-0) subject to landscape plan review summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014; approval for alternative landscape plan which shows compliance with the City's landscape ordinances with the exception of allowing and approving the variance to include up to 66 of the canopy trees within the eight -foot buffer and noting that the caliper inches will be the four -inch variety at a minimum of 75% of those canopy trees and 25% for the two-inch caliper requirement; in the event the trees are located within the eight -foot buffer zone they will be maintained to a seven -foot clear height along the sidewalks and 14-foot height along the roadway; noting that any vision or sight triangles located within the project will remain un-obscured; and subject to all other requirements that the zoning for this applicant will remain intact. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Landscape Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014. Below are the motions from the previous approval of the Zoning Change and Site Plan for the Park Village Development. Planning and Zoning Commission on September 9, 2013; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 and Staff Report dated September 13, 2013 with the following stipulations; 1) The Village area will have pavers or integral color concrete, 2) The large fountain feature at Carroll Avenue and 1709 will be a minimum of eighty-five (85) feet across, 3) The small fountain feature within the Village area adjacent to Building N will be a minimum of 600 square feet, 4) The applicant prior to going to City Council will address the screening on the roofs for the mechanical equipment and will have a detail with respect to parapets, 5) This will be one phase construction and the entire project must be completed within 120 days of the initial issuance of a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate of occupancy for any building in the project, 6) The living room area, which is the area in the Village area between Buildings N and O, will be the only area that will have overhead strung lights as depicted in the rendering, 7) The applicant will address the safety features along the pedestrian access in front of the fountain feature at the corner of Case No. Attachment A ZA14-037 Page 2 1709 and Carroll Avenue and will be ready to report to Council regarding their discussion with TXDOT concerning placing hardscape into the right-of-way, 8) The decorative architectural lighting features and also amenities, such as the custom benches, and fire pits, will be substantially similar to what has been presented in the renderings, 9) Noting the applicant's willingness to incorporate Village features into the Rim area buildings 10) That Building Tower Road and Zena Rucker Blvd is part of the phasing stipulation mentioned earlier 11) Including a requirement that improvements needed on S. Carroll Avenue adjacent to the project be completed along with the project, subject to the same stipulations 12) Including a recommendation that variances 1-5 be approved as presented and requested a) Driveway Stacking, b) Driveway Spacing c) Driveway Connections d) Parking Lot Landscape Islands e) Lighting Design. City Council 1s` readinq on October 1, 2013; Approved (7-0) pursuant to the following: site plan review summary No. 4, dated September 25, 2013; accepting Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations with the exception of items 2—fountain to be a minimum of eighty-five (85) feet across and item 5— completion of amenities package; prior to next meeting applicant will bring forward the estimated staging and completion schedule to ensure the amenities package will be more fully described to be completed prior to completion of the property as presented; approval of variances submitted in application —driveway stacking depth, driveway spacing, driveway connections to Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road, parking landscape islands and lighting design; planting box located at southeast corner of Carroll and Zena Rucker shall be stone for lower level and upper portion of the screening wall on Zena Rucker will be brick and wrought iron; applicant will work with staff to verify the Urban Land Institute (ULI) parking study with respect to the requested parking variance; applicant will clearly describe the walking surfaces and flatwork in the items referenced in the Rim buildings, which includes A, B, C, D, E, E.2, F and F.2; request for shade structures and pergolas will not be part of the request and may be provided in conceptual nature and the applicant will come back at a later time for specific approvals for the structures; sign plans will be approved as a separate item; and the fountain size will be a square footage calculation of 3,000 square feet of which the applicant will bring back specific calculations for said fountain to be located at the northeast corner of Carroll and 1709. City Council 2nd readinq on October 15, 2013; Approved (7-0) pursuant to the following stipulations: revised site plan review summary No. 4, dated October 19, 2013, with the addition of the common area architectural enhancements provided to staff in a document dated October 11, 2013 noting the document being a material part of the motion; applicant will provide a $4.75 million letter of credit from a commercial bank acceptable to the City of Southlake with terms and conditions per drawing, subject to final negotiations between the city manager, city attorney and the applicant pursuant to the performance required to complete the common area architectural enhancements provided to the City; applicant will execute a right of access approved by the city attorney; screening wall along Zena Rucker Road will be consistent with the applicant's presentation this evening; the percentage of restaurants GLA to total project GLA will be limited to 18%, which will be pursuant to the ULI methodology in the applicant's presentation this evening; the overall quality and descriptions in amenities and presentations to the city are a material part of this motion; the materials contained in the tower (part of the amenities architectural enhancements provided to city) will be of metal construction; ballards along Case No. Attachment A ZA14-037 Page 3 Carroll and FM 1709 as presented to the City as part of the landscape package will be installed before any certificates of occupancy are issued for the buildings known as the Village Buildings; applicant will work with staff to incorporate within the general contract for completion of the construction overall restrictions regarding the delivery of materials and preferred routes with specific regards to school zones and safety for the residents of Southlake; subject to the following variances: (1) driveway stacking; (2) driveway spacing: (3) driveway connections to Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road; (4) parking lot landscape islands; and (5) lighting design; and subject to the first reading of the ordinance and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations. Case No. Attachment A ZA14-037 Page 4 Vicinity Map Park Village � v aoa sos sos CIVIC PL 05 807 1230 6 �'° 1400 uJ g' 1422 R , 8o9 1200 �'- MAIN ST w o axi xia^^ �Q Zo - N m r J � $00 1400 Q �D CT FOUNTAIN N 8ro z PL w 0 0> 900 910 9181050 1100 1110 1400 L Sp F.M.1709 811 821 1401 1201 1221 1251 1431 1451 1471 829 1545 835 1275 1445 U 1425 1435 1465 841 U N S�6 12121214121s 1224 300 LAKES 1`-1p STMONT DR �8 1213 1215 1217 1219 1221 1301 1ti OO 1`L�9 1200 ^`L 1216 1218 1220 130 e 3^�h 1�1212 FQ REST 2HILLS 9DR21 13 EVE GRE (110 1215 1,LpA O o �201 N W+E ZA14-037 S Zoning Change & Site Plan 0 500 1,000 2,000 � Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA14-037 Page 1 APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO REVISE THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN 'W "Building solid relationships one location at a time..." Tne Woodmont Company April 24te, 2014 Landscape Plan Amendment Proposal City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 460 Southlake, TX. 76092 c/o Mr. Richard Schell Email: rschell(a,ci.southlake.tx.us Project: Park Village Southlake, Texas Dear Mr. Schell, This letter describes proposed amendments to the landscape plans which were initially submitted and approved in September 2013 by the City of Southlake. INTENT OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL The intent of this proposal is to request a reduction in the number of canopy and accent trees as required per the original zoning approved in September 2013. The number of trees originally approved provides a hardship to the developer to maintain the landscaping in a first class manner, continue a consistent planting schedule with the adjacent development and deliver the overall intended high aesthetic quality of the project. In order to achieve minimum coverage for the interior landscape, trees will need to be planted at such close proximity in the buffers, parking islands, and detention pond area that any understory plantings or grasses will struggle to survive in the abundant shade that is created. Also, the proximity of the plantings will allow the canopies of many of the trees species to eventually grow together and cause the trees to struggle, or even worse, fail. It should also be noted that the irrigation requirement for this great number of plants in such a small area could potentially fall under scrutiny for being perceived as irresponsible to the environment. The required density of the trees will obscure the visual relationship with Southlake Town Square and the Shops at Southlake. We feel it is important that all three major developments at the intersection have visibility to one another and maintain consistency in the quantity and quality of landscaping provided. We strongly feel that if the number of plant, as previously approved, are installed, the project will suffer from looking crowded and inappropriate. The revised landscaping plan is far more appropriate for the area and project, and will allow for all of the plant material installed to grow to its full potential and looks its best on the interior of the project and along the buffer yards. Respectfully submitted, The Woodmont Company Case No. Attachment C ZA14-037 Page 1 LANDSCAPE TREE PLAN APPROVED OCTOBER 15, 2013 LANDSCAPE LEGEND ® c��wonuu ne •• • L:ceN:.w�i�:•onA - Canopy Trees - 330 Accent Trees - 489 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. ' j LU BLDG 1 BLD BLDG K r ' I > 7 I A ;'may 0 UiW Ly `Gq aiY oe� `co I H r Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment C Page 2 CANOPYTREE • w� c .,� • ui �. wr�m�. ene,u R� .emm wwm� a�az. ACCENT TREE • u.ou.a,�ws.vn� IWe1kl11:167 UaINMI;v»e1kIel9E,IfiMKIS[1:1;tA iIMIAIIkilW E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. I r� pp o e o J:(01102�-1ae1�aCG\:1�101:� ' � 1 ey'elie.OAeve-.b Uy A NN. °d Canopy Trees - 248 - meets Landscape Ordinance Requirement Accent Trees - 376 - 66 Trees Below Landscape Ordinance Requirement Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment C Page 3 ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE TREE PLAN AT 5/6/2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING (VARIANCE REQUIRED TO ALLOW TREES IN 8' ROW BUFFER) CANOPY TREE • ae.w. w..ena.m ACCENTTREE ® un�cunw.cwxw _ c �neumvrn Canopy Trees - 248 - Meets Landscape Ordinance Requirement Accent Trees - 442 - Meets Landscape Ordinance Requirement Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment C Page 4 APPROVED SITE PLAN S.P.1 AG 1 S.F.tA to ,m - rm a tAna t w.w. wu xa aPs w.w. wu xD. tws w.w. twi tt° ass 1________- ttd-1W17. NO�A%i•21 S. P.1 NlllRd NlDllpt S.P.2 DM iAw, PNS S.P.1 VaPAhi .aa �Pvt,DEza toNM `�` o.Aic1. tea' LUD=OFFICE COMMERCIAL U °'„; .• E. $OUTHLAKE BLVD. o zo �`3'&. mk'F e'_ rSe.a•..r . Rwa.+u 0 FUTURE wt - a• O c slcNaL AQ owa,'8:.4>�fs 'M11r"T �rr0.� maroN a Q r20 . -Ds^sPe aun ,o��tTMrircs IIII _� - ------1 s ,wlrl •1 u I^ rat a IP�,woUI'DING an BUILDING uE UILDIN�, naa '; IIII o' '1 it - I.asa s.. w K IIII I, I a BUILDING , ar _ 0 _ saM sJ. � a I A b�� 047 UILLDIN6 III a BUILDING Pops.,. BUILDING BUILDIN - ti� 1 aaasr. �- w I B R 1 11 tom, -T PROPOSED ` 1 1i 1 P�a'srPiAr7" ^�•' I�Arro .11 tI~'J -a S.P.1 ra ranoj ` — fl 1 LUD=OFFICE `` BUILDING ,a c� / t:_rr srl Y IIl COMMERCIAL •`l ll C —'Oaa Q 1 �� I 1 ' ,. � rw °• P TM`"s w�'; �` * J fll.. s P p �.,,,,Rr'e'.iey•11 $ �' rasrra- N[ra 0-d 3 R �Y BUILDING € '^„'1 �11 1 cc F/ — ~ xa.P1D UTURE, s r. Ar s as J DRIVE } uuL '°"` I- = BUILDING- - i •ASIw sDNxwESr slt�LIE-K�E 111C A Nsr. tmanwxa BUILDING ' / • : E s.r. . nxtgm � ou,f ® ' x t c ' a - I 1 � mE e BUILDING otnRD Arm :; a PA D t5, I I i. R•s�xxe%'wN.S.R n6IILDsNG F A —aa TIP M '� �{, � 'R C BUILDING F2 w.t+' 1 _ uae s.r. S.P.2 ^°s r 7 I \ I�. - •I ILUD=TOWN CEP s'twPr axe .. i 1 0 werot ' euanaa U. mPJ ® �e.'•'N'fd'tIaprcass '° _ I I j! } 1 I ze •b mrxc li *i: ua Irr FUTURE PATINE >auL RuacalRD. � �$ED tZr. SIGNAL _ - }' --- 3 M'rd9J" w roirP sow .ar oP.N sett for — _ J 5 am xs xwc�� x LUD=MEDIUM D NSIT� EVIDENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I 1 11 A BIxSfa�D10]t]5}PP 0.RT LT ne _I Du w[Pt I L <�ivA xiairo i WINDING 10'u�iil rA�su ` SF- B IDr 1 Px�ir CREEK PROPOSEDn (a,' IRsr. V.1171121 D.w .1 ADDITION LOT 1 BLOCK 2 I e.ss] w reRMMrv�tss Ilt RPOD ZONING I •OFFSITE REf ENTION PARCEL' I It t T.3281 AC. �I 21. 1 •`.1 � PFOPOSID s-P-I ION]NO � �uy2 nuc A a 21" W Sta% 3t Px s ee•ss zs' w 1 1 1 An.rs' I LIFEI w. le Case No. Attachment C ZA14-037 Page 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Two Project Name: Landscape Plan — Park Village APPLICANT: Rick Machak Woodmont Land Company 2100 W. 7"'. St. Fort Worth, TX 76107 Phone: (817) 732-4000 E-mail: rmachakn-woodmont.com Date of Review: 04/11/14 Landscape Architect: Ryan Cheff Mesa Design Group 1807 Ross Ave. Suite 333 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 871-0568 E-mail: rcheff@mesadesigngroup.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/11/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. Show the property boundaries (bolded), sidewalks, bufferyards (hatched), etc. exactly as they are shown on the Council approved site plan submitted with the building permit (Sheet SP-1) and relocate landscape as needed. 2. Show the terraced retaining wall along S. Carroll Ave. and wrapping around to the drive on Zena Rucker Rd. to exactly match the site plan that was approved with the building permit (Sheet SP-1) and the renderings approved by City Council and relocate landscape as needed. 3. Show the articulated screen wall along Zena Rucker Rd. exactly as it is shown on the approved site plan and that was submitted with the building permit (Sheet SP-1) and the renderings approved by City Council and relocate landscape as needed. 4. Revise the symbols for the Little Gem Magnolias on the color landscape plan to match the legend. Landscape Administrator Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 IIFe1k111:167e1»de]►y,ILy,INIk11&_1 Cedar Elm is an acceptable canopy tree if they are provided as container grown trees. We recommend that an additional species be provided in place of some of the Cedar Elms. Relocate any trees within any of the right-of-way site triangles to behind the site triangle. Provide the site lay out as shown on the City Council approved Site Plan, including the sidewalks. Avoid placing the trees within designated utility easements, and within 10-feet of any fire hydrant. Planting a tree within a designated utility easement or within 10' of a fire hydrant is a violation. Case No. Attachment D ZA14-037 Page 1 The following section of Landscape Ordinance No. 544, as amended, pertains to plantings in the right of way. No plant material other than lawn grass and ground cover may be placed closer than 8' from the ultimate cross-section back -of -curb. 8.0 IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC R.O.W. / EASEMENTS 8.1 GENERAL: A developer slial'l be required to provide grass and irrigation in all unpaved areas of the public R.O.W.. A maximum of ten percent (10%) of the required interior plant material may be placed within the R.O.W. parkway. Should the applicant elect to provide plantings in the public R.O.W., no plant material other than 'lawn grass and ground cover may be placed closer than 8' from the ultimate cross-section back -of curb. 8.2 REPLACEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: The City shall endeavor to require replacement of all Iandscapeiirrigation improvements as a part of contracts to install public utilities within public R.O.W. and. or public easements. The City and owner sliall not be responsible for replacing these improvements. In the event the City anticipates utility improvements conflicting with intended landscapeiirrigation improvements, the City may require that the applicant wait to install said improvements until after the public improvements have been installed or under certain circumstances, the City may prohibit landscape improvements within the R.O.W. Informational Comments: A SPIN meeting for the Park Village project was held on April 8, 2013 All previously approved conditions of the S-P-1 zoning change and site plan that was approved October 15, 2013 are not changed with approval of this request to revise the landscape plan. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones except as specified in the S-P-1 zoning regulaitons. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA14-037 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Park Village PROSPECT ST1034 CIVIC PL loss aao as2 ao4 ao aoa � OSS LN M J ao1 aoa a9s ao] aos F 1490 ¢ MAIN ST 0 9ss ]04 2 MAIN ST w O 1so1 �O 700 03 UQU U) ❑ (7 Q ,�. WO ry0 800 002 804 PPS' 1400 F 9 910 EAD CT goo 140 FOUNTAIN N 601 a03 a05 ��] PL W 115 042 U t8 O50 1100 1110 1200 � f � 50 1510� 1540 1560 0 5p 6]0 00 A00 9 1580 F.M. 1709 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD E SOUTHLAKE BLVD eo] s11 21 1001 1401 1155 1575 e19 aeza ]31 ]s1 12 1221 1211 1431 1451 1471 1615 ]21 6 1 ]]1 9 1545 6 1 803 831 ©60 611 621 q, a Z O g35 1445 p00 350 ®0 Of �0 1275 1425 1435 1465 ll � 6p] ]31 Svi 8a1 1. Owner (9/30/2013) Town Square Ventures Lp Zoning DT Physical Address 140 State St Acreage 4.33 Response NR 2. Carroll/1709 Ltd SP2 1201 E Southlake Blvd 8.67 NR 3. Weatherford Loan Company SP1 821 E Southlake Blvd 2.82 NR 4. Weatherford Loan Company SP1 821 E Southlake Blvd 0.55 NR 5. Zelda Partners Ltd AG E Southlake Blvd 6.70 NR 6. Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG 841 E Southlake Blvd 4.24 NR 7. Ali, Zulfiqar Etux Samreen Ali SF20B 300 Lakeside Ct 0.57 NR 8. Poonawala, Shiraz Etux Yasmeen SF20B 302 Lakeside Ct 0.51 NR 9. SI Oak Tree Est Homeownr Assn SF20B 1200 Westmont Dr 3.26 NR 10. Carroll/1709 Ltd SP2 251 S Carroll Ave 0.93 NR 11. East Southlake #2 Ltd SP1 910 E Southlake Blvd 2.39 NR 12. East Southlake #1 Ltd SP1 900 E Southlake Blvd 1.87 NR 13. Mendez Ltd SF1-A 1050 E Southlake Blvd 3.49 NR 14. Mendez Ltd AG 918 E Southlake Blvd 5.41 NR 15. Greenway Crestwood Partners SP2 1100 E Southlake Blvd 2.41 NR 16. Greenway-Southlake Office Prtn SP1 100 N Carroll Ave 1.99 NR 17. Carroll/1709 Ltd SP2 275 S Carroll Ave 2.43 NR 18. Weatherford Loan Company SP1 E Southlake Blvd 4.22 NR 19. Prade, C A Jr Est Etal AG S Carroll Ave 0.09 NR 20. Terra/Winding Creek Llc RPUD S Carroll Ave 4.81 NR 21. Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd SP2 400 S Carroll Ave 12.55 NR 22. Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est AG 400 S Carroll Ave 9.38 NR Case No. Attachment E ZA14-037 Page 1 23. Terra Winding Creek Llc SP2 S Carroll Ave 3.79 NR 24. Terra Winding Creek Llc AG 400 S Carroll Ave 5.76 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Notices Sent: Responses Received: Twenty-four (24) None (0) NR: No Response Case No. Attachment E ZA14-037 Page 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-643a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 4, 4D AND 4G, OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 22.4812 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FORA PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 2 their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tracts 4, 4D and 4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 22.4812 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District, to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan Zoning District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following conditions: Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 3 ZONING NARRATIVE AND PROPOSED S-P-1 REGULATIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS Park Village Woodmont Land Company Southwest Corner of East Southlake Blvd. and South Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas Revised January 9, 2014 Project Description: The main project site consists of 19.9 acres of vacant undeveloped land which is currently zoned AG and S-P-2 by Ordinance No. 480-570 (Zoning Case No. ZA08-059), which is defined by the metes and bounds descriptions included. The site is bounded by East Southlake Blvd. on the north, South Carroll Avenue on the east, proposed Zena Rucker Road on the south and proposed Tower Blvd. on the west. Also included in the project site area is a 2.5 acre tract, located at the southwest corner of South Carroll Avenue and proposed Zena Rucker Road, to be used for a Drainage Retention facility. This tract is also vacant and currently zoned AG. The gross area of the site is 22.48 acres. Our Zoning request is for SP-1 Detailed Site Plan Zoning District with C-3 General Commercial District uses. This site (defined by the attached metes and bounds description) shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480-UU, as amended, as it pertains to Section 22, C-3 General Commercial District uses and regulations. This entire project is to be constructed in one phase including all buildings, water features, other amenities, as well as Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road along the project frontage. Project Amenities will consist of: • Water feature at corner of E. Southlake Blvd. & S. Carroll Ave. • Pedestrian areas with additional water features, landscape and hardscape amenities. • Private park area around retention pond at S. Carroll Ave. & Zena Rucker Road. • Sidewalk or 8' walking trails on all perimeter roads. • Bicycle stops. • Public Art Program. • Valet Parking. Surrounding Property Uses are: A. East — The Shops at Southlake — retail development — SP-2 zoning B. South — undeveloped — RPUD - Medium Density Residential zoning C. West — proposed commercial development — SP-1 zoning D. North — developed across East Southlake — SP-1, SP-2 & SF -IA zoning. Existing Site Conditions: Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 4 A. Topography — The site slopes down from a high point in the middle of the Southlake Blvd. street frontage, to the south and east (from a high elevation of 655 to an elevation of 621 at the southeast corner). The existing steep topography makes it impossible to preserve existing trees. Existing slopes on the site vary from 4% to 20%, which are grades that are not acceptable as final grades for a retail development of this nature, and makes providing accessible paths very difficult. Our approach will be to plant trees in accordance with the Landscape Ordinance, provide a pedestrian friendly atmosphere, and provide sidewalks, water features and useable open spaces. B. Hydrology — the site is undeveloped & the plan is to provide Retention/detention for the difference between the existing condition stormwater runoff and the proposed conditions runoff. The existing drainage pattern is not intended to change in the design. Detention will be provided for the overall site in the 2.5 acre site located at South Carroll & proposed Zena Rucker Road. C. Existing land use — vacant undeveloped D. Overhead electric lines exist along the streets on the north and east frontage of the project. These lines will be placed underground with development of the project. Permitted Uses All those uses permitted in the "C-3" General Commercial District. The Developer will make application with the City for a Master Sign Plan for the project. This site shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480-UU, as amended, as it pertains to Section 22, C-3 General Commercial District uses and regulations with the following modifications: Variances Requested: 1. Driveway Stacking Depth — the required stacking at driveway entrances is 100 feet. We are requesting variable stacking depths as shown on the Site Plan and as listed below measured from the right of way: Drive A — no variance - 130 ft. Drive B — corresponds to existing north drive to Shops at Southlake to east of Carroll. Drive C — no variance - 170 ft. (aligns with existing middle drive to Shops at Southlake). Drive D — 33 feet (ingress/egress from parking area to Zena Rucker). Drive E — 10 feet (ingress/egress from parking area to Tower Blvd.). Drive F — 10 feet (ingress/egress to service area to Tower Blvd.). 2. Driveway Spacing — 500 feet is required between the proposed west R.O.W. line of S. Carroll Ave. and the centerline of the main entrance drive on East Southlake Blvd. (approx. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 5 468 feet is provided) and 500 feet is required between the east R.O.W. of proposed Tower Blvd. and the driveway centerline (approx. 448 feet is provided). 3. Driveway Connections to Tower Blvd. & Zena Rucker Road — commercial & service driveways are not permitted on collector streets unless there is no other public access. We are requesting driveways be allowed as shown on the Site Plan & as recommended in the Traffic Impact Analysis by Halff Assoc., Inc. dated June 25, 2012 & revised in response to the City's consultant (Lee Engineering) review on July 12, 2012. Driveway widths are proposed as follows: Drive D — 30 feet for ingress/egress to the main parking area. Drive E — 50 feet for ingress/egress to the main parking area. Drive F — 55 feet for service entrance only. 4. Parking Lot Landscape Islands — planter islands are required to have a minimum width of 12 feet and shall be equal to the length of a parking space. The parking lot landscape area requirement for this project site is 15 sq.ft. per parking stall. We are requesting that the minimum width of landscape islands be 9 feet, face of curb to face of curb, and that we be allowed to use diamond shaped tree islands, 4 feet by 4 feet to face of curb in limited areas as located and dimensioned on the Site Plan. 5. Lighting Design — the lighting ordinance requires that Luminaires on poles over 42" in height and exterior wall mounted fixtures shall be either high pressured sodium lights or neutral or warm correlated color temperature LED lights or other lights giving a similar soft lighting effect. We are requesting to be allowed to use high pressured sodium for pedestrian scale lights in sidewalk areas only and metal halide for parking areas and wall mounted lights. The proposed metal halide luminaires will meet the same requirements for correlated color temperature LED lights required by the ordinance and will be installed as shown on the Photometrics Plan by WLS Lighting included in the Site Plan submittal. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 6 Development Regulations 1. Proposed Park Village Parking Tabulation a 0a y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M 0 Ln r O O OI 'D °O � O�� V m C a lr b •? C M n a0 M d' W N N Ln � u N Y c o rl M tD V1 O 00 O O Ln M -r Ilk Ln Ln w oo N O N Ic Ln ID V Ln W ID I1 00 o N Q O Q 00 V V11�1 LD V Ln a0 c-I C V h tp V M � ' e W 0�1 N M tiT ID V m V M h r, N N m iA y m c y 0! O m O Ln LD .-I M to Ln Ln O N of Ln n d' M 'I .� a L ° N O N I� III LD R Ln rl M LD 01 M Ln Ln W F c0 V V LD V Ln oc Ln Cl V V oc V LD ;t MI M io V nj V 00 0) N M M W N Ln M V n O ci c-I c-I N c-I N Ln m c OfO v�i -001 y ° o0 O I, n r-I M A Ln at O Ln R Ln C M t61 .1 W O V LD I" M V O ItO I� op .--I V 00 n M e S .... N.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... tL N N a m LD Ln M N tD 00 41 Ln o Ln n M O n R O O O O V w m Ln o Ln m c-I V 01 m of Ln 4 o p°I O N Ln c-I O N c-I 0 0 00 Ln LD N r- o0 C c 0 O rl N O M O, a0 Di , V. V U) M M O\ at N N N c-I .--I N c b In 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O OI OM1 M N V 01 u C Q a m o 0 o O O o 0 0 0 O o O O O O OI o ° a 00 m N a W OJ a N O O O O N O LD .--i O O 00 V1 OI 00 N O tD w N 00 Ln M N lA O O C ID tD LD 00 - V M M a0 LD LD V E v OL O u m Ln M N of o0 O w LD ID r M of N w O M jry ,0 m ID O M V VI V ID ID M r CI CI 00 N M Ln N J Q ° C _ ci Ln N rl n Lr n tD Il 0 41 01 LD tD Lr 7T O m Ln' M' M' M O c M M LD' LD' LD' V M M M lD � •j u Z •O Y K Q D. w CO J M Q OD w U O w LL. LNi O Z� J Y�— WD OD OD Dfl Dfl Dfl Dfl Ofl OD OD OD Ofl Dfl Dfl Dfl ofl OJ N N 'O 'O 'O 'O '6 '6 -O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O '6 '6cL° c-I U C a + Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 7 "Parking Standards and Demand. The fact that a customer usually visits several stores during a single shopping trip and the rate of turnover of the spaces distinguish parking requirements for shopping centers from those of freestanding commercial enterprises. Parking standards are expressed as a parking ratio —the number of parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (93 square meters) of GLA in a shopping center. GLA is a known and realistic factor for measuring the adequacy of parking provisions in relation to retail use. Based on a comprehensive study of parking requirements for shopping center conducted by ULI and the International Council of Shopping Centers in 1999, the following base parking standards are recommended for a typical shopping center today: • Four spaces per 1,000 square feet (93 square meters) of GLA for centers with a GLA of fewer than 400,000 square feet (37,175 square meters) The parking ratios presented above apply to centers that have no more than 10 percent of their GLA occupied by restaurants, entertainment venues, and/or cinema space. For centers where these uses occupy 11 to 20 percent of GLA, a linear incremental increase of .03 space per 1,000 square feet (93 square meters) for each percent above 10 percent is recommended."' Our proposal reflects a restaurant percentage to the total size of 18.21%; therefore, the Center should have an overall parking ratio of 4.24 parking spots. ([18.21% - 10%] = 8.21 x .03 =.24+4=4.24) 1 Retail Development, Fourth Edition by Urban Land Institute - ULI Development Handbook Series, Copyright 2008, (Chapter 4. Planning and Design, Pages 152, 153) NOTE: No additional parking spaces will be required for outside dining/patio seating. The above building area square footage does not include outside seating areas. 2. Loading Zones a. Loading Spaces (minimum 10' x 50') will be provided for individual tenants larger than 10,000 square feet. b. Loading will be provided for typical smaller tenants by using vacant parking spaces outside the fire lane & restricting the deliveries to "off -business" hours. 3. Buildings A, F, F2, J, K, L, M, N and O shall be allowed to have outdoor seating for restaurant related uses in the areas noted on the approved site plan, subject to compliance with city codes and ordinances for outdoor seating. 4. Buildings less than 6,000 square feet shall NOT be required to have a pitched roof as required by the Zoning Ordinance Section 43 — Overlay Zones, paragraph 43.13.a(2). 5. Front, side and rear yards: With the following exceptions, no front, side or rear yard setback is required: a. Buildings along Southlake Boulevard shall maintain a minimum thirty five (35') foot setback from the existing right of way line before additional dedications forturn lanes (as dimensioned on the Site Plan); b. Buildings along Tower Boulevard shall maintain a minimum fifteen (15) foot setback; Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 8 C. Buildings along the South Carroll Avenue shall maintain a twenty five (25') foot setback from the proposed right of way after additional dedications for street widening and required turn lanes (as dimensioned on the Site Plan); d. Buildings along Zena Rucker Road shall maintain a twenty five (25') foot setback. e. No interior building setbacks to interior lot lines will be required if the property is subdivided in the future. 6. Front, side and rear bufferyard: with the following exceptions, no front, side or rear bufferyard is required: a. A twenty (20') foot bufferyard (TYPE "O") shall be provided along Southlake Boulevard; b. A ten (10') foot bufferyard (TYPE "B") shall be provided along Tower Boulevard; C. A ten (10') foot bufferyard (TYPE "E") shall be provided South Carroll Avenue; d. A ten (10') foot bufferyard (TYPE "B") shall be provided along Zena Rucker Road. e. No interior bufferyards along interior lot lines will be required if the property is subdivided in the future. 7. Impervious coverage for the overall site plan area (22.48 acres within this SP-1 district) with the Retention pond area included shall not exceed 75%. There shall be no maximum impervious coverage for individually platted lots within the overall site plan. 8. An 8' wide multi -use trail is proposed along the south side of Zena Rucker Road. As indicated on the Site Plan, the portion of the 8' multi -use trail along the frontage of the residential property to the south of Zena Rucker Road will be constructed when that property is developed. The portion along the Retention pond parcel lot will be constructed with this project. 9. All curb cuts into E. Southlake Boulevard are subject to approval by TxDOT. The Deceleration lane at the main entry drive along with appropriate ROW dedications to maintain parkway widths will be required with the construction of the driveway/street cuts along E. Southlake Boulevard. 10. Deceleration lanes that are recommended in the Traffic Impact Analysis (by Halff Associates, Inc.) along the street frontage of this project along East Southlake Blvd. and South Carroll Avenue will be constructed with this project. The South Carroll Avenue configuration for widening and turn lanes will be based on Scenario 3 of the City of Southlake 2030 Mobility Plan & the report prepared by Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc. dated October 2, 2102. 11. Building Articulation — Building articulation is required in accordance with the Corridor Overlay Zone, in the Zoning Ordinance, Section No. 43, per Exhibit 43-A. We are Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 9 requesting that horizontal and vertical articulation shall be permitted as shown on the site plan and building elevations included in the Site Plan submittal. 12. Building Facade Materials - Building facade materials are allowed as shown on the elevations. 13. Masonry Ordinance — we request a Variance to the Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, to allow the building facade materials as shown on the elevations. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 10 LETTER REQUESTING TO AMEND LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED APRIL 24, 2014 W WORTH I HOUSTON --1 "Building solid relationships one location at a time..." TIm W-d-1 U,pa,Y April 24`s, 2014 Landscape Plan Amendment Proposal City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 460 Southlake, TX. 76092 c/o Mr. Richard Schell Email: rschellna ci.southlake.tx.us Project: Park Village Southlake, Texas Dear Mr. Schell, This letter describes proposed amendments to the landscape plans which were initially submitted and approved in September 2013 by the City of Southlake. INTENT OF AMENDMENT PROPOSAL The intent of this proposal is to request a reduction in the number of canopy and accent trees as required per the original zoning approved in September 2013. The number of trees originally approved provides a hardship to the developer to maintain the landscaping in a first class manner, continue a consistent planting schedule with the adjacent development and deliver the overall intended high aesthetic quality of the project. In order to achieve minimum coverage for the interior landscape, trees will need to be planted at such close proximity in the buffers, parking islands, and detention pond area that any understory plantings or grasses will struggle to survive in the abundant shade that is created. Also, the proximity of the plantings will allow the canopies of many of the trees species to eventually grow together and cause the trees to struggle, or even worse, fail. It should also be noted that the irrigation requirement for this great number of plants in such a small area could potentially fall under scrutiny for being perceived as irresponsible to the environment. The required density of the trees will obscure the visual relationship with Southlake Town Square and the Shops at Southlake. We feel it is important that all three major developments at the intersection have visibility to one another and maintain consistency in the quantity and quality of landscaping provided. We strongly feel that if the number of plant, as previously approved, are installed, the project will suffer from looking crowded and inappropriate. The revised landscaping plan is far more appropriate for the area and project, and will allow for all of the plant material installed to grow to its full potential and looks its best on the interior of the project and along the buffer yards. Respectfully submitted, The Woodmont Company MAP Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 11 Planning and Zoning Commission motion at September 9, 2013 meeting: Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 and Staff Report dated September 13, 2013 with the following stipulations; 1. The Village area will have pavers or integral color concrete; 2. The large fountain feature at Carroll Avenue and 1709 will be a minimum of eighty-five (85) feet across (revised in the City Council I" reading motion to a minimum size of 3, 000 square feet, which is shown as an oval with dimensions of 70 feet by 55 feet in the applicant's presentation at City Council 2nd reading included in Exhibit `B').; 3. The small fountain feature within the Village area adjacent to Building N will be a minimum of 600 square feet (shown in the applicant's presentation in Exhibit `B" as a square dimensioned at 25 feet by 25 feet); 4. The applicant prior to going to City Council will address the screening on the roofs for the mechanical equipment and will have a detail with respect to parapets; 5. This will be one phase construction and the entire project must be completed within 120 days of the initial issuance of a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate of occupancy for any building in the project (revised in the City Council I" reading motion to follow the schedule presented at 2nd reading in the applicant's presentation included in Exhibit `B')' 6. The living room area, which is the area in the Village area between Buildings N and O, will be the only area that will have overhead strung lights as depicted in the rendering; 7. The applicant will address the safety features along the pedestrian access in front of the fountain feature at the corner of 1709 and Carroll Avenue and will be ready to report to Council regarding their discussion with TXDOT concerning placing hardscape into the right-of-way; 8. The decorative architectural lighting features and also amenities, such as the custom benches, and fire pits, will be substantially similar to what has been presented in the renderings; 9. Noting the applicant's willingness to incorporate Village features into the Rim area buildings; 10. That Building Tower Road and Zena Rucker Blvd is part of the phasing stipulation mentioned earlier; 11. Including a requirement that improvements needed on S. Carroll Avenue adjacent to the project be completed along with the project, subject to the same stipulations; 12. Including a recommendation that variances 1-5 be approved as presented and requested a) Driveway Stacking, b) Driveway Spacing c) Driveway Connections d) Parking Lot Landscape Islands e) Lighting Design. City Council 1s' reading motion at October 1, 2013 meeting: Approved 1s' reading (7-0) pursuant to the following: 1. Site plan review summary No. 4, dated September 25, 2013; 2. Accepting Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations with the exception Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 12 of items 2—fountain to be a minimum of eighty-five (85) feet across and item 5— completion of amenities package; 3. Prior to next meeting applicant will bring forward the estimated staging and completion schedule to ensure the amenities package will be more fully described to be completed prior to completion of the property as presented; 4. Approval of variances submitted in application —driveway stacking depth, driveway spacing, driveway connections to Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road, parking landscape islands and lighting design; 5. Planting box located at southeast corner of Carroll and Zena Rucker shall be stone for lower level and upper portion of the screening wall on Zena Rucker will be brick and wrought iron; 6. Applicant will work with staff to verify the Urban Land Institute (ULI) parking study with respect to the requested parking variance; 7. Applicant will clearly describe the walking surfaces and flatwork in the items referenced in the Rim buildings, which includes A, B, C, D, E, E.2, F and F.2; 8. Request for shade structures and pergolas will not be part of the request and may be provided in conceptual nature and the applicant will come back at a later time for specific approvals for the structures (removed from attached S-P-1 regulations); 9. Sign plans will be approved as a separate item; 10. The fountain size will be a square footage calculation of 3,000 square feet of which the applicant will bring back specific calculations for said fountain to be located at the northeast corner of Carrol I and 1709 (shown as an oval with dimensions of 70 feet by 55 feet in the applicant's presentation at City Council 2nd reading included in Exhibit «, City Council 2nd reading motion at October 15, 2013 meeting: Approved 2nd reading (7-0) pursuant to the following stipulations: 1. Revised site plan review summary No. 4, dated October 19, 2013; a. The curb curve radii for fire lanes at drives E and F need to be a minimum 30' or approved by the Fire Marshal. b. Access onto the private property located west of this development must be coordinated with the property owner and shown on the civil construction plans. All access easements shall be negotiated and approved prior to the approval of Civil Construction Plans. For driveways along FM 1709, coordination with TxDOT shall be required. C. Currently, Driveway E on Tower Blvd. does not align with the Tower Plaza driveway as shown on the approved Tower Plaza site plan, which increases the potential for left turn traffic conflicts at this location. The applicant is working with the developer of Tower Plaza to relocate their drive to align with the Southlake Park Village drive. 2. With the addition of the common area architectural enhancements provided to staff in a document dated October 11, 2013, noting the document being a material part of the motion (included in Exhibit "B"); 3. Applicant will provide a $4.75 million letter of credit from a commercial bank acceptable to the City of Southlake with terms and conditions per drawing, subject to final negotiations between the City Manager, City Attorney and the applicant, pursuant to the performance required to complete the common area architectural enhancements provided to the City and the applicant will execute a right of access Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 13 approved by the City Attorney to allow the City to access the property if the City has to construct the common area architectural enhancements; 4. Screening wall along Zena Rucker Road will be consistent with the applicant's presentation this evening (included in Exhibit "B"); 5. The percentage of restaurants GLA to total project GLA will be limited to 18%, which will be pursuant to the ULI methodology in the applicant's presentation this evening (included in the S-P-1 regulations above); 6. The overall quality and descriptions in amenities and presentations to the City are a material part of this motion; 7. The materials contained in the tower (part of the amenities architectural enhancements provided to City) will be of metal construction; 8. Bollards along Carroll and FM 1709 as presented to the City as part of the landscape package will be installed before any certificates of occupancy are issued for the buildings known as the Village Buildings; 9. Applicant will work with staff to incorporate within the general contract for completion of the construction overall restrictions regarding the delivery of materials and preferred routes with specific regards to school zones and safety for the residents of Southlake (included in Exhibit "B"); 10. Subject to the following variances: (1) driveway stacking; (2) driveway spacing: (3) driveway connections to Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road; (4) parking lot landscape islands; and (5) lighting design; 11. And subject to the first reading of the ordinance and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations. Motions for Ordinance No. 480-643a: Planning and Zoning Commission motion at April 17, 2014 meeting: April 17, 2014; Approved (4-0) subject to the Landscape Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014, further subject to the staff report dated April 11, 2014, and noting the applicant's willingness to provide an alternate Landscape Plan that would meet the Landscape Ordinance and take into account use of the 8' buffer zone from the curb. City Council 1st reading motion at May 6, 2014 meeting: May 6, 2014; Approved at 1st reading (6-0) subject to landscape plan review summary No. 2, dated April 11, 2014; approval for alternative landscape plan which shows compliance with the City's landscape ordinances with the exception of allowing and approving the variance to include up to 66 of the canopy trees within the eight -foot buffer and noting that the caliper inches will be the four -inch variety at a minimum of 75% of those canopy trees and 25% for the two-inch caliper requirement; in the event the trees are located within the eight -foot buffer zone they will be maintained to a seven -foot clear height along the sidewalks and 14-foot height along the roadway; noting that any vision or sight triangles located within the project will remain un-obscured; and subject to all other requirements that the zoning forthis applicant will remain intact. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 14 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 15 That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to post the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 16 a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 61" day of May, 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 17 DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 18 1*:1:11:3kdviv Being described as Tracts 4, 4D and 4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 22.4812 acres, and more fully and completely described below: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR PLAT BOUNDARY 22,4812 ACRE TRACT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE O. W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 8991N THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PART OF THE 49.724 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ANNE SHANNON AND OGDEN K. SHAH NON III, CO -TRUSTEES OF THE ANITA H. PRADE TESTAMENTARY TRUST B, AS RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NO. D211012231 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND ALSO BEING A PART OF THE 19.299 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RCP SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD 12, LTD. BY DEED AND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO. D203471724 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT AN "X" SET IN CONCRETE FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 49.724 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ANNE SHANNON AND OGDEN K. SHANNON III, CO -TRUSTEES OF THE ANITA H. PRADE TESTAMENTARY TRUST B, AS RECORDED VOLUME 10315. PAGE 1256 (COUNTY CLERKS FILE NO. D211012231) OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AN 0.151 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED LIS PENDENS NOTICE FOR WIDENING OF SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY) AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 10316 AT PAGE 1258 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND FURTHER EVIDENCE IN JUDGMENT IN ABSENCE OF OBJECTION RECORDED IN VOLUME 10479 AT PAGE 595 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) WITH THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY) (69.18 FOOT WIDE AT THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 01' 02' 58" EAST (BASIS OF BEARING PER TEXAS NORTH CENTRAL ZONE 4202 STATE PLANE COORDINATES) AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE AND BEING COMMON TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PRADE 49.724 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 847.51 FEET TO A 518" IRON ROD SET FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00° 53' 15" EAST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CARROLL AVENUE FOR A DISTANCE OF 297.79 FEET TO A •/::"IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 38.000 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO TERRAIWINDING CREEK LLC, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NUMBER D212056812 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 88" 59' 25" WEST AND DEPARTING THE WEST LINE OF SAID CARROLL AVENUE AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TERRAIWINDING CREEK LLC, 38.000 ACRE TRACT FORA DISTANCE OF 479.19 FEET TO IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 38.000 ACRE TRACT, AND BEING IN THE EAST LINE OF THE 8.597 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO TERRAIWINDING CREEK, LLC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER COUNTY CLERKS FILE NUMBER D212056832 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 12` 31' 32" EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID 8.597 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.65 FEET TO A Y" IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 00' 46' 32" WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 8.597 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.58 FEET TO AN ALUMINUM DISC FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 8.597 ACRE TRACT; THENCE NORTH 89` 49' 31" WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TERRAIWINDING CREEK 8.597 ACRE TRACT, FOR A DISTANCE OF 374.74 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM CAP FOUND FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 88° 19' 05" WEST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TERRAIWINDING CREEK 8.597 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 113.93 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM CAP FOUND FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TERRAlWINDING CREEK 8.597 ACRE TRACT AND BEING IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID RCP SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD # 2, LTD., CALLED 19.299 ACRE TRACT, SAME BEING THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO VISION SOUTHWEST SILVERLAKE, LLC, BY DEED RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO. D207135294 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 00" 44' 54" WEST (NORTH 00" IT 53" WEST PER DEED) AND FOLLOWING SAID RCP SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD # 2, LTD., CALLED 19.299 ACRE TRACT, SAME BEING THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO VISION SOUTHWEST SILVERLAKE, LLC, BY DEED RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO. D207135294 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS FOR A DISTANCE OF 391.00 FEET TO A 518" IRON ROD SET FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 12° 25' 00" WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO. D211300126 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR A DISTANCE OF 521.00 FEET TO A "X" FOUND IN CONCRETE IN THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE AFORESAID SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709); THENCE NORTH 88° 54' 51" EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) AS ESTABLISHED BY SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEED TO THE STATE OF TEXAS RECORDED IN VOLUME 9769 AT PAGE 2091 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR A DISTANCE OF 454.45 FEET TO A 112" IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00"41'40" WITH A RADIUS OF 11,394.16 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 89. 09' 45" EAST AT A DISTANCE OF 136.09 FEET - THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (F.M. 1709) AND ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 138.09 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD SET FOR CORNER, SAID POINT BEING IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID PRADE 49.724 ACRE TRACVT, SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFORESAID 19.299 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RGP SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD #2, LTD., AS RECORDED UNDER DOCUMENT NO. D203471724 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED 0.226 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 9769 AT PAGE 2091 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00' 53'49" WITH A RADIUS OF 11394.16 AND ACHORD BEARING NORTH 89° 57' 29" EAST AT A DISTANCE OF 178.38 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) AS REFLECTED IN SAID LIS PENDES NOTICE AND FOLLOWING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 178.38 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD SET FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 89° 29' 29" EAST AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) AS REFLECTED IN SAID LIS PENDES NOTICE FOR A DISTANCE OF 261.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 22.4812 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 19 EXHIBIT `EB" SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 5F.1A v liRo ud.:`.°Ll.S� S.P.1x A P.Irwc u.e OITt.I LVO•OFFICE CO—ERCIAL .1c.1. L� E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. FUFURE �: SIGNAL 1p r - -- _rV TI, M BUILDING �° 8 BIALDNNG I LOW E No BInLNMNGBULONG - +I, "N3InLDING J PROPOSED t _ PROPOS q ,If1 W-tom 9 LuI>e OFFlCE i ,¢ CONYERCIAL V , Is,u! LO 1 - 1 oMVE i, Il tr. $ V AM W ` W _ A O ------- r>tiw samwi5r wsn=rE uc � � N \ / MNLDING ; . v =•— I I fir — �l e El u.aneo �BURDINO P 4�w ir. 8ili1MN0 Fi I � � e. �mi � � _ � � Rwr fir � o � L ` • ¢ rye[. a rr i f . ILN O-TOWN OWN C I f 1 TINISK IJ 41 n FUTURE YEN► BACKER RD, PROPOSEDD ZlA ~ CKEfi kD. FUTURE � I }is ig rls �9+a D NSITY ESIOExEIAL I w w„ pEry9� ES pENiIAL IT�w.n[erw/A'rt ilgi. +pror,rara oai T DWO IRM _ zx a'w.r PROPOSED °3F LOT 7 BLOCK 2 'OFFSITE REWNTION PARCEL' I I F. �} � 3� wr l �� 4 rnaocrca s-s-I I e ' . o� RFE GN6 w !rr cs • siu. „n /AL7i R4x w. ,e Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 20 Pm�wned Signal ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 BLDG D i4 L.SOUTHLAKE BLVD. W 0 f BLDG) BLDG K BLDG L BLDG N"� HLDGM j rf j BLDGO G =� �✓ s` I Y BLDGE :) O�� 1 a BLDG E2 BLDG F BLDG F2 4 PROPOSED ZENA RUCKER RD. -----I&— ��e�g sg�t IIII 11 Illl I Illl I IIII I IIII I IIII 1111 I IIII I III I III I III I III I Ld I a I J II ,I II �I I I I 31 I I I I l II 11 I1 Y1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �I�II II` I I II I;I I II Ili III I III I �I II II 111 _ 111 �\ 11 11 411 It: M Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 21 1h l^' s, � • 0Z-- I ■ x. s ■93 R I PHASING PLAN Construction Phase Plan Date of Commencement F--7 Day I F--7 Day 90 7-7 Day 150 F--7 Day 180 DaY210 Day 315 Case No. ZA1 4-037 "o— E. SWTHLAKE BLVD. N Ko BUILDING B IIDL— kfHfl+d4* PROPOSED ZEMA ROCKER. Attachment F Page 23 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN i, SOUTHLAKE BLVD. l IIIIIIIIIII LIlIIIMilI�LI11111'� � _ II�OM6 9ViILl V -- - n - { BULLCIwC II S �l Pft^' - IgllIF eua^�ol III�IIIILIlI ��rII�III1ll�llLILL� 9 .pF ' a .a .nre - P11-1, PIiiW cJ111 11 P:PPc- I'll ERGO CONTROL PLM PUBLIC INPROVEMENTf vux oP SE- Case LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 LANDSCAPELEGEND RED OAP Ouamue ahumordi •LIVE OAK Ouercus rirginiana OGINGKO Ginkgo blobs 14.RTF:11 RFD fFDAR Junima -gin— CRAPE MYRTLE • Logomhaomio x faunoi'Tuararara' ® va STETREE " wag^'.a waan •DESERTWILLOW ChIMPsls lbrearls LANDSCAPE LEGEND TEKAS 3111E Leuuyh,llum au,as�a��s DWARF/URFORD HOLLY Ilex burfo dWeana' REDYUCCA H.w..loe Parvifolia CRAPE IAYRTLE ®DWARF Lagamt—amd— ASIAN JASMINE T2cfelotpermum asla[icum PURPLE LEAF WNTERCREEPER LuonYmaue furtunei SEASONAL COLOR , • p IQI eu O eLDG c A 1 I' 1 a �11' BLDGD �dlLIt ti%• II I RIDGE 'I 'i I � M I BLDGG • • I KL. t' M.I1.t_ II ' PROPOSED ZENA R R RD. II j tlii aI I ,I I . I II �„ E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 9 DG P aLDG r xl.lxi PR0P(1SFn JFNA RI1[:K RRI R RD l'o.—.1fol, x Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 25 TREE CONSERVATION PLAN SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 26 ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS �w E. SOLITHLAKE BLVD. i � I IIII I I IIII o4 b' BLDG I RLDG J BLDG R II II IIll II w ' BLDGA • f I') _. _ _ IIII - �.'; Miw of lntegml/Stamped/ 6005F wuntaln Colored C—t—d _ 3,0005E FouMaln _ 1 - Mck Pavers - - I .:. BLDG L III ` \�- �1• 1 I 1111 BLDG H i' �j `e a 3 B Y It .. ! HLDG BLDG M V Qf 1111 RI.DGC Q T T•. }f ]'Scx 3T Tawet/F (Feature BLDG o '' . 10 M m ..• 1� I 6 iLa BLDGn ,,,✓✓✓'���""" D A 1I1 1I { ys�Q i.+ r=. ',. BLDG F. � r �'. —' E t✓ � 4 :: u (� Eli \\V [p� BLDGE2 - !` fl RLDGF RLIx: R2 1 �q '«K ,X, FF Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 27 Park Village Southlake, Texas COMMON AREA ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS 10/11/2013 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION COST 1 SIGNATURE FOUNTAIN (1) 3,000 SF fountain at corner of FM 1709 & Carroll Ave $ 1,100,000 2 INTERIOR FOUNTAIN (1) 600 SF fountain located east of Building "N" $ 200,000 3 LINEAR FOUNDTAIN(S) (2), totalling 84 SF, located in the "Village" area $ 60,000 4 FIRE PIT (1), located in the "Village" area $ 20,000 5 ARCHITECTURAL TOWER FEATURE (1), located in the "Rim" area $ 150,000 6 SEATING Architectural/decorative seating located throughout development $ 100,000 7 PLANTERS - CAST IN PLACE (8), raised planters in "Village" area $ 40,000 8 PLANTERS - POTS (25), raised pot planters located in Rim and Village areas $ 100,000 9 DECORATIVE BOLLARDS (50), located at corner of FM 1709 & Carroll and throughout the "Village" area $ 50,000 10 CONCRETE - COLOR UPCHARGE (95,000 sf), inclusive of upcharge for colored concrete in "Village" area. $ 427,500 11 IPAVERS / STAMPED CONCRETE (30,000 sf), located throughout the "Village" area $ 210,000 12 RETAINING WALLS - CARROLL AVE Architectural planters and retaining walls $ 248,005 13 SCREEN WALLS - ZENA RUCKER RD Architectural screenwalls on Zena Rucker Rd $ 125,000 14 DECORATIVE LIGHTING (30), decorative light poles and fixtures. $ 180,000 15 DENTENTION POND AMENITIES Landscaping, lighting, seating and pond aeriator $ 132,000 16 LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION Throughout project $ 650,000 TOTAL COST $ 3,792,505 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 28 Project Amenities PRRKVILLRGE -0-&k&- The Developer shall be obligated to construct/deliver the "Project Amenities", as defined on the preceding schedule, in conjunction with overall Development: Within 30 days of the City's issuance of the first building permit in the Development, the Developer would provide letter of credit ("LOC"), in a form acceptable to the City, in the amount of the estimated cost of the yet - to -be -constructed Project Amenities, naming The City as the beneficiary. - The LOC shall be subsequently reduced by the amount of each Project Amenity upon completion of such Amenity. - The LOC shall automatically expire/terminate upon completion of all the Project Amenities. - Should the Developer fail to complete all Project Amenities within 18 months following the issuance of the first building permit, the City shall then have the right draw upon the LOC and cause for the construction of the Project Amenities that are then -outstanding. - Developer shall provide the City with a temporary construction easement, in a form acceptable to the City, to allow the City (and its contractors) to enter upon the Development property to complete the Project Amenities by an agreed upon date. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 29 LORA, a Ir O`er- NIGHT I MESA MESA CUSTOM BENCHES SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CUSTOM BENCHES SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment F Page 31 MESA MESA FIRE PITS iw r :•'? -..1 �",. sir � ; _� �� . SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS HARDSCAPE DETAILS SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment F Page 32 _ — now _ 1 3� 4 ti i MESA PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 34 MESA VILLAGE CENTER EXPERIENCE SOUTHLAKE PARK VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE FOR VILLAGE CENTER Enhanced Paging Materials PRUVILLHSE J�-- Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 35 "RIM" Walking Surface & Flatwork PROPOSED ZEIN RUCKER RD. II f'C "RIM" Material Types PRRKVIIIRGI - 0o�142,1- - PRRKVILLHGE - 0oU Finished Scored Concrete Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment F Page 36 Screen Wall ZENA RUCKER ROAD SCREEN WALL Screen Wall 1,!Edk e p- a ear PRRK VILLRGE -e- C Buildings F & F2 PERS-EVE RENDERING 111. I-CHMANARCH IrvCTS - - tKto I'1 ase No. ZA14-037 Attachment F Page 37 ZENA RUCKER ROAD SCREEN WALL (STAMPED CONCRETE WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE WHITE STRIPE) Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 38 MATERIALS FACADE • ae r• e. umo • um•'wn• '� cunuEEo sroxF .. i . _ , MEriY)GGIMOM COMPPNY I PARK ALL GE I SOIIMIAK v MORM l:"�■II ■nui �n oLrraoE GuoE mr WEEMEMENE F M TMALSCNEWLE IMM HERSCHMANARCHITECTS THEWOONAC14TCOWANY PARKMUAGE I SOLrTHLAKE.TX Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 39 ELEVATIONS \ L= - H IIIiE HERSCHMANARCHITECTS THEWOODMONTCOMPANY PARKVLSAGE SOUTHIAKE.TX - � rjil sF F. kc w— 710N 1 lill Will LJ r ELEYA7ION DESIGN CONCEPT: BUIMINGA 11,MHEaERSCHMANARCHITECTS THEWOODMONTCOMPANY PARKVILLAGE I SOUTHLAKETX MIM. Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 40 �RIL ""_.� ener oarom. ener ena SEVATION DESIGN CONGER. BUILDING A 'NHERSCHMANARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK MLLAGE I SOUTHLAKE1% `♦7�' .. : i�I c.asia.o sm�o-art en�L ELEVATION OESIGNCONCER. BUILDING6 H.ERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK IALLAGE 11 SOUTHUKETX t♦r_ Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 41 F Al l ! y CJ. OVATION DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING& IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONT COMPANY PARK IALLAGE I SOUTHLSKET% MOM i ELEVATION DESIGN CONCEPP BUILDING C HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK VILLAGE I SOUTHLAKET% W#j= Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 42 �r snEErmLE HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOODMONTCOMPANY PARK VLIAGE 11 UTHL4KE,N K61[SRI sk&�. ,I{ R I EIP/AIION DESIGN CONCEM BUILDING D HERSCHMANIARCHITECTS THEWOCONOMCOMPANY PARKVLAGE SWH-AKETX 11M Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 43 T'6 _ ®TN Nry.l ..ter Y 0 ELEVATION DMCN CONCEPT: SUILUINGO IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONT COMPANY PARK MLLAGE 11 SOUTHLSKETX tj I'f I n .• .. ..... ! `-'• MATCH DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING ITS HMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOCOMONTCOMPAW [ PARKYLAGE I SOUTHLAKETX Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 44 6T�bLerepii- _. My TZ Lk, PT I I re !; BUILDING DELGN_CONC_ EPT: BUILDING E I TSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOCCIMONTCOMPANY PARK VLIAGE SCJTHLII'ETX `8][N a�q�m r it ® ip vr.pl - ' I _' enc. au.. ne. ma cumnm smw cmwr.e s•-- anu 24 ' �� emramm e BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDINGF2 ® H.ERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK VILLAGE 11 s UTHLAKEI% M]&10 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 45 m ReNc PwtiO Culonctl _ cepng snna cgeY a s�.re ' CJ! BUILDING DESIGNCCNCEPT: BUILDINGF2 IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONT COMPANY PARK IALLAGE I SOUTHLSKET% M][�' lBnHMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOODMOWCOMPANY f PARKvLAGE SOUTHLAKEfx Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 46 r ELEVATION DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK MLLAGE 11 SOUTHIAREI% M[*Ml m.Fx Y CJ. ELEVATION DESIGN CDNCEFT: BNIIDINGF IN H.ERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK VILLAGE 11 SOUIHLSKEI% Itl16= Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 47 "-, .......... MIMI, �- - l [ conoi.a sioi. e.�w eri�k ELEVATION DESIGN CONCELR: BUILDING F2 HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK IALLAGE I SOUTHLAKEI% « !� L r7 Elk - ELEVATION CJ. DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING F2 H.ERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONI COMPANY PARK VILLAGE I SOUTHLAKE7% I#)QM Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 48 C�.SHEETTITLE HERSCHNIAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMONT COMPANY PARKVILLAOE iOuTHLAKE.Tx I�ypwm ov � Ti jTCv �1_ -- .,I I �? MATION DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING I ® HERSCHMNI AN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMOCOMPANY PARK VILLAGEI SOUTHUKETX KOVMI Case No. ZA14-037 Attachment F Page 49 ELEVATION DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS TNEWOODMONTCOMPAM PARK 4ILLAGE 11 SOUTHIAKETX M)ZMI 1 n EIEYAiIONDE5IGN CONCEPT: BUIId NG1 I TSCHMANARCHITEM THEWOCOMONTCOWAW [ PARKVLAGE SOXHLA1ETX Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 50 BUIIDINGDESIGNCONCEPI: BUILDING ITS HMAN ARCHITECTS REWOOONOMCOMPAW PARK VILLAGE I SOUTHLPI'ETx `O)PI.0 .• ........ .. `-" IIUIIDING DEPON CONCeE: VAU7INGK ITS HMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOOONONTCOMPAW j PARKV"GE I SCUTHLAKETK Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 51 lA~M I' ',. [unu.ed Stme FaMo xe FY a elwMml &� elwNreM elwohenl -- BUILDING DE&GNCONCEPT: BUILDING ITS HMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOOUCMCOMPAW PARK VILLAGE LAKETX " �� sHEErmI� LWMM HE w.ua.RSCHMANARCHITECTS THE WOODMONT COMPANY PARKIALLAGE SOIRHLAKET% �is Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 52 .......-.. • U, eunnNGD NOONC- nmciNci IT2S HMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOOU laJCOMPAW PARKIALLAGE I SCIXHLAKETA t419:01 \ I lWDINGDEMGNCX3MCWf 8UlLMH l ITS HMANARCHITEM THEWOOCTHEWOOONCMCOWANY�PARK�➢lAGEISWHLAKETX �ICIIAGEISW�HLAKFTX �ICI� Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 53 AI' -. . .•.......... &RDING 0®CrNCONCEPL BUILDING L ITS HMANARCHITEM THEWOCCYMOMCOMPAW PARKVLAGE I SOUMLAKETX .....-... • U' NINDING DEMN CONCBL MUYNGM ITHMANARCHITEM THEWOCONOMCOMPAW j PARKVLAGE STHLAKETX Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 54 BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPT. BUILDING M ITS HMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOODMONLCOMPANY PARKVRLAGE SOJT,L,ETx T s I BUILDINGDMGNCONCEP BUILDING ITS HMANARCHITECTS THEWOCCMONLCOMPANY�PARK�IIAGE SOJLHLnVE':< t�X.`� Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 55 LI BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPT: BUILDING IN,H CHMANARCHITECTS THEWOOOMONTCOMPAW PARKVILLAGE 11 SOUTHLAKETK tlxfMl ...... BUILDING DEOGN CONCE". MOM N H623CHMANARCHITECTS THEWOCOMONTCOMPAW [ PARKV"GE I SOUTHLACE.T% Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 56 e t BURDING DESIGN CONCEM. BUILDING O IN HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THEWOODMONTCOMPAM PARK 4ILLAGE I SOUTHLAKM �P.Mj ._ a i i o BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPT: BUDING0 H.ERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS THE WOODMOM COMPANY PARK VILLAGE SOUTHUKET% I/Xj' Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 57 •�pz� HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS BUILDING DESIGN CONCEW: NIILDING O THE WOODMONT COMPANY <'✓LLAGE I SOUTHIAKETX+L[!� SHADE STRUCTURES ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY - SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PER COUNCIL MOTION WOOD/FAB RIC COMMERCIA I UMBRELLA ALUMINUM/FABRIC COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA COMMERCIAL PIVOT UMBRELLA OFFSET COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA SMALLSCALE COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA UMBRELLA EXAMPLES G HERSCHMANARCHITECTS TI IL WOODMONT COMPANY PARK VILLAGE SOUTIILAKE,TX ��yM II Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 58 SHADE STRUCTURES ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY - SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PER COUNCIL MOTION BRIC%AND WOOD PERGOLA DMEN& NAL WORD PERGOLA DIMENNONAL WOOD PERGOLA FEMMIXARBRMES 110 HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS MEWOOD.ICNTC0.WMY PARKMLLAGE I SODMLAE.TX Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 59 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH ORDINANCE NO. 480-643a Reserved for Approved Landscape Plan Case No. Attachment F ZA14-037 Page 60