Item 6ACITY OF
SOUTHLAI<,-E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
March 26, 2014
CASE NO: ZA14-006
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for the Westin Hotel
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change
and Site Plan for the Westin Hotel from "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned
Unit Development District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "HC" Hotel
District Uses and other related uses as depicted in the applicants narrative for
the development of a hotel and parking garage on approximately 6.83 acres
located at 1200 E. State Hwy 114. SPIN Neighborhood # 4
DETAILS: Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change
and Site Plan for the Westin Hotel from "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned
Unit Development District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "HC" Hotel
District Uses and other related uses as described in the applicant's narrative
under Attachment `C' of this staff report. The current zoning on this property
was approved by City Council in 2007 for the development of the Gateway
Church campus which also allowed for "HC" Hotel District uses in this area of
their development.
The proposed hotel includes areas with restaurant/lounge, conference/ meeting
space, retail space and other hotel related support services (back of house
services). The proposal also includes a 3-level parking garage with
approximately 400 parking spaces in addition to the 95 surface parking spaces
located mainly around east and south perimeter of the site. The materials used
on both the hotel and parking structure are a mixture of stucco, stone and glass
curtain wall with aluminum and metal accent features throughout. The following
is a site data summary of the proposed hotel:
Westin Hotel
Gross Acreage
6.83
Existing Zoning
NR-PUD
Proposed Zoning
S-P-1
Impervious Coverage
82%
Open Space Acreage (%)
18%
Number of Lots
1
Number of Buildings
1
Number of Floors
7
Total Floor Area
277,150 sq. ft.
Required Parking
495
Provided Parking
500
Case No.
ZA14-006
Variance
Driveway Stacking Depth - The Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires for this
site to have 150-feet of driveway stacking depth at each of the two driveways
(Driveway A and B) for the 500 parking spaces being proposed on site. The
applicant is proposing to have approximately 33-feet at each driveway along
Grace Lane.
On the March 18, 2014 City Council meeting, the applicants request was
approved provided that they return at their second reading with some alternate
fence types for the western and northern boundary other than the wooden
board on board fence they had initially provided. The applicant has indicated to
staff they will provide some fence options for City Council at their second
reading on April 1, 2014.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing
2) Consider 2nd Reading Zoning Change & Site Plan Approval Request
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Meeting Report — January 6, 2014
(E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 11, 2014
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 480-660
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker
Daniel Cortez
Case No.
ZA14-006
(817) 748-8067
(817) 748-8070
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Gateway Church
APPLICANT: Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1200 E. State Hwy 114
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 4, Gateway Church — 114 Campus Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District
REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "HC" Hotel District Uses
HISTORY: - On June 17, 1997 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan for "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development
District under Planning Case ZA96-132 (Ordinance No. 480-222).
- On August 21, 2007 the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for
the Gateway Church campus under Planning Case ZA05-113.
- On August 21, 2007 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan for the Gateway Church campus from "NR-PUD" Non -
Residential Planned Unit Development District to "NR-PUD" Non -
Residential Planned Unit Development District with religious institutions
as the primary use under Planning Case ZA05-112 (Ordinance No. 480-
222a).
- On May 8, 2008 the Planning & Zoning Commission approved a Final
Plat under Planning Case ZA08-029.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on January 6, 2014 for this proposed
development. A copy of this report can be found under Attachment `C' of
this staff report.
SOUTHLAKE 2030:
Case No.
ZA14-006
Consolidated Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Future
Land Use Plan designates this
property as Mixed Use. The
Mixed Use land use
designation is defined within
Southlake 2030 as the
following:
"The range of activities
permitted, the diverse natural
features, and the varying
proximity to thoroughfares of
cASEy
2,r
U
areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned
and coordinated development. New development must be compatible
with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention
should be placed on the design and transition between different uses.
Attachment A
Page 1
Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher -
intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and
residential uses. Nuisance -free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and
assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed
to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those
permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial,
and Office Commercial categories previously discussed."
Hotels within the Mixed Use land use designation are described as the
following:
o Hotel uses should be full -service hotels at market -driven locations,
primarily in the S.H. 114 Corridor. Full -service, for the purposes of
this plan, shall be hotels that include a table -service restaurant
within or directly attached to the hotel. Other services or amenities
typically included would be bell service and room service, as well as
available meeting space.
o The desire is to approve hotels adequate to support market -driven
commerce in the City, paying attention to the product mix such that
the hospitality services in the area are complementary to one
another.
According to both these descriptions, the proposed hotel development is
consistent with the intent of the land use description and hotel
description.
Urban Design Plan
The Urban Design Plan also includes a few recommendations pertaining
to the State Highway 114 corridor where this site is proposed to be
located. They are as follows:
o Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along
the highway, specifically at mid -block locations. Buildings should be
4 — 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the
highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated
along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be
brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low -profile, single story pad
buildings that tend to blend into the background and have limited
visibility from the highway are discouraged
o The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited.
Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no
more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and
pedestrian accessways.
o Structured parking is encouraged over surface parking. Specifically,
shared parking is also encouraged between adjoining
complementary land uses. Special attention should be given to the
design of parking garages to avoid plain facades with views of
parked cars from adjoining properties and rights -of -ways. Fagade
details, vertical and horizontal courses such as cornices, lintels, sills,
and water courses should be used to add interest along facades. To
the extent possible, parking garages should be located behind
Case No. Attachment A
ZA14-006 Page 2
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Case No.
ZA14-006
principal structures to limit views from the highway.
This proposed development has a parking garage located towards the
rear of the site screened from the highway by the hotel making this
request consistent with the intent within the Urban Design Plan
recommendations.
Mobility Master Plan
On the City's Thoroughfare Plan within the Mobility Master Plan Grace
Lane is shown to be a 100-foot, 4-lane divided arterial (A4D). During the
development of the Gateway Church campus, a variance was granted
for Grace Lane to be reduced to an 80-foot divided arterial.
The Active Transportation section of the City's Mobility Master Plan
recommends an 8-foot or greater multi -use trail along the frontage road
of State Highway 114. The applicant is proposing a 10-foot sidewalk
along the frontage road and a 6-foot sidewalk along Grace Lane.
Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed development will have access onto Grace Lane by the
way of two driveways, labeled on the site plan as Driveway A and
Driveway B. Grace Lane is currently built with 100-feet of right-of-way
and a median closest to the State Highway 114 frontage road then
narrows down to an 80-foot undivided roadway.
0WT HIGHLAND RC:_
O
J
J
U
Q
K
LEGEND
COMPLETED
FUTURE EXTENSION
FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
(BY OTHERS)
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was provided by the applicant for this
development. City staff has received comments from its consultant
regarding this TIA. These comments can be found under Attachment `E'
of this report.
Attachment A
Page 3
24hr
-... - Exit Ramp to Carroll Avenue (017W)
West Bound (7,308)
AM
Peak AM (475) 7:45 AM— 8:45 AM
PM
Peak PM (733) 5:30 — 6:30 PM
* Based on the 2013 City of Sonthlake Traffic Count Report
Hotel (310) 276 1 1,127 1 79 1 65 1 98 1 71
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7" Edition
TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 65% tree coverage on this site. The applicant
has indicated to staff that only 40% of these trees are considered to be
healthy. The "S-P-1" zoning district does not require the applicant to
preserve any minimum amount of trees but rather makes their tree
preservation plan subject to City Council's approval. Due to the amount
of grading this development will require, no trees will be preserved and
therefore the applicant did not develop a tree conservation plan.
UTILITIES: Water
The site has access to an existing 20-inch water line along the State
Highway 114 frontage road and an 8-inch water line along Grace Lane.
Sewer
The site will have access to an 8-inch sewer line that was installed
during the development of the Gateway Church campus.
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION: February 20, 2014; Approved (6-0) as presented subject to Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated February 13, 2014 and staff report dated
February 14, 2014 and granting the requested variance.
CITY COUNCIL: 1s' Reading
March 18, 2014; Approved (6-0) noting that the applicant will bring
forward to Council at their second reading some fencing alternatives
where the cedarwood plank (board on board) fence has been shown on
their site plan on the western and northern boundaries and will bring
forward some masonry alternatives, and subject to Site Plan Review
Summary No. 3, dated March 11, 2014 and approving the stacking
depth variance.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 11, 2014.
N:ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12014 Cases1006 - ZSP - Westin HotellStaff Report
Case No. Attachment A
ZA14-006 Page 4
Vicinity Map
Westin Hotel
chi
C)
m m
W
o Q
J
Z
'oo
w
()
1050
1361
rr
1009 C7
0 1170 121
iCAS CT
0
1201 1213 n
1075
T9T
979 950
o
ti
M
1000
LEI
0
'
75
1025
loon
1050
p 2O�
975
10zS
.y
'7,r
975E120
00
0
Cn
950
v
•�•
.1
W E
�-
ZA14-006
S
Zoning Change &
Site Plan
i
0 400 Boo 1.600
Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA14-006 Page 1
Plans and Support Information
Lot 1, Block 4
Gateway Church — 114 Campus Addition
The proposed SP-1 District for the referenced lot shall follow Section 28 "HC" Hotel District guidelines with the
following exceptions:
• Height: No building or structure shall exceed seven (7) stories or 115 feet.
• Maximum Impervious Cover: The maximum impervious cover shall not exceed eighty five (85%) percent
of the total lot area.
Hotel Description and Amenities
The site plan proposes a full service, upper upscale, four star hotel franchised with Starwood Hotels under their
Westin brand (or equivalent), in one phase. The hotel will have up to 280 rooms.
Services to be provided at the hotel to include:
• Three meal restaurant in the lobby (breakfast, lunch and dinner).
• Full service lounge in the lobby area (lunch, dinner and late night).
• Room Service (breakfast, lunch, dinner and late night).
• Coffee shop in the lobby area (daytime and evening).
• Roof top restaurant, lounge and private dining (lunch and dinner).
• Business Services (for groups) — including secretarial, translation.
• Bell service .
• Daily Maid Service.
• Evening turndown service.
• Wired and wireless High Speed Internet Access.
• Concierge Service.
• Areas on the lobby level conducive to social business.
• Poolside breakout / social / business areas with cabanas.
Indoor facilities and amenities to include:
• Up to 229 standard guestrooms, measuring 13 to 14 ft by 27 to 30 ft (351 to 420 sf).
• Up to 30 "shotgun" style suites, measuring 13 to 14 ft by 35 to 40 ft (455 to 560 sf).
• Up to 17 two -bay suites, measuring 26 to 28 ft by 27 to 30 ft (702 to 840 sf).
• A concierge level of guest rooms, with a concierge lounge.
• A full service restaurant on the lobby level.
• A full service lounge serving alcoholic beverages on the lobby level.
• The "Haven" — Westin's gathering / social business area, on the lobby level.
• Meeting and conference space totaling up to 22,000 sf including:
o Ballroom —approximately 7,800 sf (capacity- 650 banquet)
u Up to 9 Meeting rooms —a total of up to 6,000 sf (with capacities ranging from 30 to 200)
o Up to 2 Boardrooms, each approximately 600 sf, (capacity of 20)
Roof Top function room, of approximately 4,000 sf, (capacity - 330 banquet).
• Club level fitness center — approximately 2,000 sf.
• Boutique retail space - approximately 2,000 sf.
• Business Center area in the lobby.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA14-006 Page 1
Lot 1, Block 4
Gateway Church —114 Campus Addition
• A roof top restaurant / lounge, with some private dining rooms and an approximately 4,000 sf function
room (with support areas including a lobby, kitchen, restrooms and storage areas)
• Administrative, front, reservations and sales offices.
• Public restrooms, seating areas and other guest support and comfort areas.
• Back of the house areas, including housekeeping / laundry, kitchen, storage, maintenance, mechanical,
employee lockers, employee lounge, human resources and employee training areas.
Outdoor Facilities and Amenities to include:
• Pool area
• Covered canopy in pool area
• Open pavilion
• Pool area Gazebos
• Pool patio area with fireplaces, hardscape and greenscape areas
• Interior courtyard off the meeting space and restaurant
• Roof Top patio area off the function room
• Covered, garage parking.
Parking:
The parking garage shall be a permitted accessory use. It will consist of one (1) ground level and two (2) above-
ground levels.
Total parking provided will be a minimum of 495 spaces (approximately 400 in the parking garage and 95 surface
spaces). This count is based on the Parking Study prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated December
26, 2013.
Landscape:
Interior Area Requirements: The amount of interior landscape area (as defined in Landscape Ordinance No. 544-
B) required for the parking garage shall be 5 percent of the floor area.
Bufferyards:
The proposed bufferyards (as defined in Section 42 — Bufferyards) shall all consist of Type A.
Tree Preservation:
Given that under the proposed site conditions, tree preservation is not possible. Therefore, the tree
preservation requirement for this site (as defined in Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D) shall be zero (0)
percent.
Screening and Fencing:
Proposed dumpsters/compactors and loading areas shall be screened in accordance with approved site plan and
landscape plan.
Retaining Walls:
Proposed retaining walls will be either terraced retaining walls or one single taller retaining wall. They may
consist of gravity, modular or cast -in -place wall(s). The materials may consist of either concrete with concrete
finish, stacked stone, modular blocks, concrete with stone veneer, or stamped concrete.
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment C
Page 2
e Rfl�,
F $43
OMM, NAM
110
•2e��R�
sue.>°ge moo^°� Xmo�s��s
Ell SIM.
�Wam p<AN m
� mo
Proposed Site Plan
I I
I I
I
I I �
g I I I I I
, I I
/�'------- - -T---�------
r---___-_-
WESTIN HOTEL Klm rn
SITE PLAN LOT I,BLOCK4 a $�a ��� and Ass d tes,Inc.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY
TEXAS 76092 ¢ �ww,.n xiarz w�. ew •. .. ro��l u�-ae�i
Case No. Attachment C
ZA14-006 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl 4-006 Page 4
Proposed Landscape Plan
U
�r
BENZENE
ti
74,
I'L
lk.
75,
*6
WESTIN • EM" Kirnley-Horn
LOT 1 r BLOCK 4 M and Associates, Inc.
CITY OF SOMLAKE TARRANT COUNTY
TEXAS 76092
Proposed Landscape Plan
U
�r
BENZENE
ti
74,
I'L
lk.
75,
*6
WESTIN • EM" Kirnley-Horn
LOT 1 r BLOCK 4 M and Associates, Inc.
CITY OF SOMLAKE TARRANT COUNTY
TEXAS 76092
Proposed Elevations
Y:
II ill !EA I',IIIII
n IIII■ ,
_ is ■,■
L ' It jla�y -
-is
llll
�'__� IIIII�
�� I IIIIII
null i�l,l�l,l�lhl� IIIJI
IIIIII iiiiiliiiiiiil■ ���
II■��nl __ a
iNO I�I,I�II�II� It I■ IIIIII �!liai: --
IIIIII MENEM
IIIIII I�II�II�II� It is IIIIII
Ell! I� is IIIIII I�il=°I=°I=°I='
I�I�. �� "�■ IIIIIIII
rIF ii I■ i���. -
.� IIII
1 1 I .illy I■ I I '����� 1=ira=1i=i�;
•u,- l� IIL� IIII 11 � �
I�i1=iE I.l■ IIIIII ���'�� �
- - IIIIII i�r��� � ■
G �lilt
in w
I:��:
- --- IIIMs
Case No. Attachment C
ZA14-006 Page 5
Conceptual Floor Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA14-006 Page 6
Site Amenities
Case No.
ZA14-006
LANDSCAFE SEATING
BOLLARD
N°2
EXTERIOR AMENITIES CONCEPTS
CASE • ZA14-006
Attachment C
Page 7
Case No.
ZA14-006
METAL PANEL
�nP Ir'
N°4
MATERIALS, MASONRY, GLASS CONCEPT
CASE a ZA14-006
Attachment C
Page 8
Case No. Attachment C
ZA14-006 Page 9
USIOUTHLAK'E
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO. Formal submittal pending
PROJECT NAME: Westin Hotel
SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 4
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2014; 6:00 PM
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Sixteen (16)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry 47
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Paul Bardem and 5 others
• STAFF PRESENT: Patty Moos, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cortez, Planner II: (817)748-8070 or dcortezCa?ci.southlake .txus
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at the northwest comer of Grace Lane at SH114.
Development Details
The plan presented at SPIN:
Y/a;rw
Concept Elevation
Case No. Attachment D
ZA14-006 Page 1
F-'Iolect Location
Protect Site
Case No. Attachment D
ZA14-006 Page 2
H- i, ti 1 1 4
WEST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
Elevations
Development Details:
• Four star full Service Hotel with 270 rooms
• 18,000 sf meeting space and other amenities
• Roof top Lounge and restaurant
• Parking structure in rear tucked into site
QUESTIONS/CONCERNS
What is the schedule for the hotel construction?
Design thru 2014 with construction for 15-18 months and opening in Summer
2016.
Where is the Texas turn -around located in relation to the hotel site and distance from
Grace Lane?
The tum-around is located 300 If west of Grace Lane.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA14-006 Page 3
How many parking spaces are in the parking structure and on ground level?
Approximately 400 garage spaces and 70 on site spaces.
Concern about the Gateway Church parking and the hotel development and if there is a
way for the City, church and hotel to work with traffic on the weekends to help residents
with the heavy traffic. Grace Lane expansion will help with traffic to the north
What is the timeline for the Texas turn -around construction?
The project should start this spring or Summer.
k1eeting presentation adjourned at 6:35 pm
SPIN! Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatves. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meet ng minutes: rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials. City staff, and the publ c of the ssues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summar.zed in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the aaplicant. Interested part es are
strongly encouraged to fol ow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment D
Page 4
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA14-006 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 03/11/2014
Project Name: Westin Hotel
APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. OWNER: Seneca Rochester Harrell Southlake JV
Anna Carrillo, P.E. Warner Stone
801 Cherry St., Ste. 950 16800 Westgrove Dr., Ste. 100
Fort Worth, TX 76102 Addison, TX 75001
Phone: (817) 335-6511 Phone: (214) 265-8686
Fax: Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
02/06/2014 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Daniel Cortez, AICP
Principal Planner
P: (817) 748-8070
E: dcortez ci.southlake.tx.us
1. The following comments pertain to driveways and the Driveway Ordinance No. 634:
a. Both driveways onto the site do not meet the minimum stacking depth of 150-feet. A
Variance has been requested for this requirement.
2. No more than 50% of any facade may be reflective glass. For the purposes of this ordinance,
reflective glass shall be defined as glass having a reflectance of greater than 10%. As
mentioned at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, the glass was proposed to have
less than 10% reflectance.
3. Please be aware no signage is being approved for this development if the zoning change and
site plan are approved. A separate sign permit will need to be obtained for any signage
including but not limited to building signs, directional signs and monument signs.
4. Please add in your development regulations a comment noting the type of lighting that is
proposed to be used on the exterior of the building for aesthetic purposes indicating that the
nighttime rendering that was presented to Council on March 18, 2014 is an acceptable form of
exterior lighting for the building.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sandersonna ci.southlake.tx.us
• Contact Steve Anderson with any general engineering questions. General engineering
Case No. Attachment E
ZA14-006 Page 1
requirements will required during the civil engineering review of this development.
Lee Engineering's review on the Traffic Impact Analysis provided by the applicant can be
found on the next several pages.
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment E
Page 2
14 3030 LBJ FREEWAY
SUITE 1660
DALLAS, TX 75234
072-248-3006
www-LeeEngineering.com
Viri rcnanac:nne
January 13, 2014
Mr. Steven Anderson, P.E.
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 320
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: Westin Hotel Development - Traffic Impact Analysis Review
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Per your request, we have reviewed the traffic engineering study for the proposed "Westin
Hotel" prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc and dated January 6, 2014. The proposed
development is located to the west of Grace Lane and north of the SH 114 westbound frontage
road in Southlake, Texas.
We offer the following comments on the submitted traffic impact analysis:
• The text of the TIA indicates that the land use is a hotel with associated meeting
facilities and a restaurant. The hotel will have 276 rooms, approximately 25,000 SF of
meeting space and 9,557 SF of restaurant/kitchen space. The proposed development is
planned for operation in 2015.
• The trip generation estimates were correctly developed using the equations provided by
the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The development is projected to generate
2255 daily trips with 146 trips during the AM peak hour and 166 trips during the PM
peak hour. In order to be conservative, the study factored up ITE based trip generation
by 40% to develop the trips numbers used in the study. The number of AM peak hour
trips used in the analysis was 204 and the PM peak hour trips was 232. This
methodology appears to be reasonable.
• The trip distribution percentages appear to be reasonable and are based on the existing
traffic patterns.
• The site is depicted using a single driveway that does not align with the church driveway
across Grace Lane. While the Westin appears to be utilizing an existing driveway
1 V E A R S
OF EXCELLENCE
Case No. Attachment E
ZA14-006 Page 3
approach, the driveways should align so that the future divided Grace Lane can function
with a single median opening serving both driveways in a typical fashion.
• Grace Lane is designated as an A41) arterial with 100' of ROW. Based on the site plan
contained in the TIA, 80-88 feet of right of way is provided across the face of the site. At
the site driveway Grace Lane appears to be 48-52 feet wide with no divided median.
• The TIA states that the site driveways do not satisfy City of Southlake requirements for
stacking depth and that a variance will be requested. The analysis presented in the
study supports the request. It is important to note that the analysis in the study did not
include any traffic on Grace Lane other than site traffic. Driveway egress operations
may change once Grace Lane is extended to the north to Kirkwood. Ultimately any
difficultly exiting the property will likely cause minimal if any impact to traffic on Grace
Lane.
o The requested stacking distance variance appears to be reasonable based on the
information presented in the TIA,
• The TIA indicates acceptable operations are expected at all study area intersections with
the addition of site traffic.
• The TIA was accompanied by a parking technical memorandum where the applicant
recommends reducing the required number of spaces provided by the development
from 620 as required by City code to 495 spaces.
o The methodology and data sources used to justify the parking reduction appear
to be reasonable and within industry norms.
o As a secondary check, Lee Engineering generated parking demand for a 276
space hotel using ITE Parking Generation along with 9,547 feet of restaurant
space. This results in the following parking demands:
85'n -85m
WEEKDAY PARKING Average Average percentile Percentile
DEMAND ANALYSIS Demand Spaces Demand Spaces
Suburban Hotel (310) Weekday 0.89 / room 246 1.08 / 298
room
Restaurant with Bar/Lounge 13.3 / 1,000 17.4 /
(932) Weekday SF 127 1,000 SF 166
WEEKDAY DEMAND
(Not adjusted for Shared parking) 373 - 464
Shared Parking Adjustment
(Hotel use parked at 75% peak) -62 -75
Total Demand 311 389
2
YEARS
i OE EXCELLENCE
Case No. Attachment E
ZA14-006 Page 4
85th
85'n
SATURDAY PARKING
Average
Average
Percentile
Percentile
DEMAND ANALYSIS
Demand
Spaces
Demand
Spaces
Suburban Hotel (310) Saturday
1.2 / room
331
1.54 /
425
room
Restaurant with Bar/Lounge
16.3 / 1,000
20.4 /
(932) Saturday
SF
156
1,000 SF
195
SATURDAY DEMAND
(Not adjusted for Shared parking)
487
-
620
Shared Parking Adjustment
(Hotel use parked at 75% peak)
-83
-106
Total Demand
404
514
o Restaurant and hotel uses peak at different times during the evening allowing parking to
be shared efficiently between the uses. Hotel parking demand is typically 70-75%
during early evening when the restaurant use peaks. This results in the availability of a
significant number of hotel spaces being available for other uses. The 85" percentile
Saturday parking demand exceeds the requested 495 spaces; however, due to shared
parking between the uses as well as the presence of nearby church parking that can be
used as shuttle/overflow or employee parking, the requested reduction in parking
requirements to 495 spaces appears to be reasonable.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to
provide these and are available to address any additional comments or concerns.
Sincerely,
John P. Denholm III, P.E., PTOE
Lee Engineering
TBPE Firm F-450
Case No.
ZA14-006
f, F--J
YEARS
OF IXCIiLINC I
Attachment E
Page 5
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclementsa-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The proposed structure will be considered a high-rise building as per the City of Southlake
amendments to the 2009 International Fire Code.
2. No comments were made pertaining to the parking structure due to the limited amount of
information provided. (Parking garage will be reviewed with future plan submittal)
3. Automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (per 2009
I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended)
4. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet
from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5'
if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser.
5. The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant. (A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement)
6. Fire department sprinkler connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a
30 degree down elbow and a Knox locking cap.
7. An exterior audible/visual fire alarm device must be installed above the Fire Department
Connection on the building to indicate when a fire alarm condition is present in the building.
8. A Class I standpipe system shall be installed throughout the building to meet the requirements of
the 2009 International Fire Code.
9. An automatic fire alarm system and an emergency voice/alarm communications system is
required as per the City of Southlake amendments to the 2009 International Fire Code.
10. A complete set of plans for the underground fire protection line, fire sprinkler system, and fire
alarm system shall be submitted to Reed Fire Protection for review and approval at 14135
Midway Road in Addison, Texas 75001. Business phone is 214-638-7599.
11. Emergency and Standby Power Systems must comply with Section 604 of the International Fire
Code and NFPA 110 and 111.
12. The egress path markings in the building shall comply with the high-rise building requirements
as indicated in Section 1024 of the 2009 International Fire Code.
13. HVAC units over 2000 cubic feet per minute shall have a duct smoke detector mounted on the
return side of the unit, that when activated, shall send an alarm condition to the building fire
alarm panel and shut the unit down. HVAC units over 15000 cubic feet per minute shall also
have a duct detector mounted on the supply side of the unit that functions as the detector does
Case No. Attachment E
ZA14-006 Page 6
on the return side. If the units are located above ceiling tile, remote reset switches must be
installed below the duct detector location.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
1. Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay" basis for sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access
needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 26 feet wide and able to support the
imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 80,000 pounds GVW)(Maintain 26 feet wide fire
lanes around the entire building)
2. Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn
radius. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
1. All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed near
access to the riser room and near the front entrance to the building. Boxes can be ordered at
www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office.
General Informational Comments
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
All curb radii and fire lanes must meet fire code (2009 IFC) or be approved by the City's Fire
Marshal.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
Approval from TxDOT will be needed for the construction of the sidewalk along the State Hwy
114 frontage road. Coordinate this approval with the Public Works/Engineering Department of
the City.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and
will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA14-006 Page 7
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Westin Hotel
12so
12
13sa
p 5 me
1301
1335 1349 1 9
1501 1749
Z
J
�
�o
U
3fi1
1050
1009
11 ]0 121
12011213 l
1075
S
979 g50
1800
'Y
E KIRKWOOD BLV
1000
�
900
}
`'
1025
❑
UW1
W
M
Q
K
1000
H75
�02s
S
I••
1.
Maietta, Jonathan C & Meredith
SF1-A
1204 COSTA AZUL CT
1.07
NR
2.
Boggaram, B Etux M Singri
SF1-A
1205 COSTA AZUL CT
1.00
NR
3,
Sanchez, Christopher Michael
SF1-A
1700 E HIGHLAND ST
1.54
NR
4.
Lloyd, William E Etux Carol L
SF1-A
1201 ST EMILION CT
0.94
NR
5.
Shafi, Shahid & Ayesha Sayany
SF1-A
1200 COSTA AZUL CT
1.02
NR
6.
Womack, Justen
SF1-A
1201 COSTA AZUL CT
1.03
NR
7.
Schulz, Edwin Etux Laura
AG
1213 CASEY CT
0.29
NR
8.
Nec Carroll & 114 Ltd Prtnshp
AG
950 N CARROLL AVE
0.16
NR
9.
Nec Carroll & 114 Ltd Prtnshp
AG
940 N CARROLL AVE
0.21
NR
10.
Nec Carroll & 114 Ltd Prtnshp
AG
930 CASEY CT
0.02
NR
11.
Kaufman, James C & Denise Hine
SF1-A
625 BRIARWOOD DR
1.35
NR
12.
Slts Grand Avenue Lp
DT
1420 DIVISION ST
2.90
NR
13.
Slts Grand Avenue Lp
DT
1430 DIVISION ST
2.55
NR
14.
Pebl Partnership Ltd
SP1
1110 E SH 114
1.28
F
15.
Schenk, Joel
AG
1075 CASEY Cr
0.38
U
16.
Johnson, Deborah Bohannon Etal
AG
1033 CASEY CT
0.43
NR
17.
Collins, Ted Etux Gayla
SF1-A
997 CASEY CT
0.42
NR
18.
Carroll ISD
AG
1375 E HIGHLAND ST
0.70
NR
19.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
1301 E KIRKWOOD BLVD
0.23
NR
20.
Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc
AG
1680 E SH 114
3.09
NR
21.
Coty, Rita
SF1-A
600 CHERRY LN
1.00
NR
22.
Vision Southlake Dev Llc
NRPUD
640 N KIMBALL AVE
0.04
F
23.
Ekstrom, Delton E
SF1-A
650 CHERRY CT
0.99
NR
24.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
700 BLESSED WAY
82.01
NR
25.
Carroll ISD
AG
1361 E HIGHLAND ST
1.04
NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 1
26.
Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc
AG
1730 E SH 114
8.08
NR
27.
Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc
AG
1700 E SH 114
1.11
NR
28.
Moss, Angelia J Etvir Jack A
SF1-A
550 CHERRY LN
1.09
NR
29.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
1200 E SH 114
6.78
NR
30.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
1501 E HIGHLAND ST
22.52
NR
31.
Vision Southlake Dev Llc
NRPUD
650 N KIMBALL AVE
0.73
F
32.
Slts Land Lp
DT
1301 E SH 114
0.92
NR
33.
Patrizio Southlake Llc
C3
1281 E SH 114
1.12
NR
34.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
701 BLESSED WAY
34.29
NR
35.
Brown, Ronni Etvir Richard
SF1-A
600 BRIARWOOD DR
1.27
NR
36.
Carroll ISD
AG
1349 E HIGHLAND ST
1.60
NR
37.
Gateway Church
NRPUD
2000 E KIRKWOOD BLVD
20.94
NR
38.
Carroll ISD
CS
1335 E HIGHLAND ST
3.92
NR
39.
Carroll ISD
CS
-
1.59
NR
40.
Carroll ISD
CS
-
0.76
NR
41.
Carroll ISD
CS
1301 E HIGHLAND ST
0.32
NR
42.
Carroll ISD
AG
-
0.64
NR
43.
Steele, Crystal M Etvir Robert
AG
1212 CASEY CT
0.30
F
44.
Carroll ISD
AG
1009 N CARROLL AVE
0.43
NR
45.
Southlake, City Of
AG
-
0.13
NR
46.
Southlake, City Of
AG
1371 E HIGHLAND ST
0.26
NR
47.
Carroll ISD
AG
1379 E HIGHLAND ST
0.77
NR
48.
Southlake, City Of
AG
-
0.26
NR
49.
Southlake, City Of
AG
-
0.15
NR
50.
Knight, Harold I Etux Shirley
AG
1749 E HIGHLAND ST
12.50
NR
51.
Greenway-Carroll Road Prtnrs
C3
1201 E SH 114
7.09
NR
52.
Fechtel, Joe Est
NRPUD
1778 E SH 114
0.08
NR
53.
Slts Land Lp
DT
245 N CARROLL AVE
13.48
NR
54.
Slts Grand Avenue Lp
DT
1501 E SH 114
0.27
NR
55.
Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc
AG
1750 E SH 114
7.84
NR
56.
Pafel, Thomas D Etux Marcia L
SF1-A
550 BRIARWOOD DR
1.05
NR
Cantrell, Mike L Etux Sue IV
SF1-A
1203 BLYTHE LN
3
58.
Thomas, Donald Etux Connie
SF1-A
1350 E HIGHLAND ST
0.90
NR
59.
D'Souza, Adam Etux Swati
SF1-A
1200 BLYTHE LN
0.92
NR
60.
Carroll Road Baptist Church
CS
1282 E HIGHLAND ST
1.03
NR
61.
Butcher, Adam Wayne
SF1-A
1200 ST EMILION CT
0.99
NR
62.
Meyer, Colin J Etux Jessica M
SF1-A
1204 ST EMILION CT
0.98
NR
Herndon, Boyd K Etux Susan K
SF1-A
1201 ASHMOORE CT
0.91
O
64.
Carroll ISD
SP1
1800 E KIRKWOOD BLVD
24.43
NR
65.
Vision Southlake Dev Llc
SP1
600 N KIMBALL AVE
9.96
F
66.
Fechtel, Joe Est
NRPUD
1774 E SH 114
0.25
NR
F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent: Forty -One (41)
Responses Received: Seven (7)
Case No.
ZA14-006
NR: No Response
Attachment F
Page 2
Notification Response Form
ZA14-006
Meeting Date: February 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Herndon, Boyd K Etux Susan K
1201 Ashmoore Ct
Southlake Tx 76092
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of (opposed to' undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
1V4.0'n C Off -/I r to c #---, � 6 I de /-"Wj
AX--A
II & pkv
C` W64
i 1441 r
c
( '�'t
[ ( I ->-� w ff Aq I, jo-
f L sc
Signature: ra04 Date:
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s): _
Must be property owner(s) whose
Date:
,4 .. ff A rK4 6 n
are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZA14-006
Meeting Date: February 20i
2014 at 6.30 PM
Pebl Partnership Ltd
PO Box 96017
Southlake Tx 76092
'+tit
nl-
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature:
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s):',�r,
Must be property owner(s) whose names) are printed at
Date: Z "12_r�
Date:
the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional): _ Zt32
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment F
Page 4
Notification Response Form
ZA14-006
Meeting Date: February 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Schenk, Joel
1075 Casey Ct
Southlake Tx 76092
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to und_ec ded abou�
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
e^G�- ii
Signature:
Additional Sid"nature:
Printed Name(s): jc;4
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top.
Phone Number (optional):
Date:,-9 /
Date J�� ✓�
ise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
qC)q o3<A�
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 5
Notification Response Form
ZA14-006
Meeting Date: February 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Vision Southlake Dev Llc
PO Box 2260
Keller Tx 76244
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
7nfavor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature:
Additional Signatu
Printed Name(s): C�a,,'O l +�`fi
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Ot
Phone Number (optional):
Date: o�
Date: 1 lI
contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 6
Feb 20 2014 0:49AM I09
817-329-4190 P.1
Notification Response Form
ZA14AO
Meeting Date: February 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Cantrell, Mike L Etiix Sue
1203 Blythe Ln
"uthlake Tx 76092.
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the Qrner(e) of the prop,so, noted.ab�ye�are hereby
in favor of apposed t i 6ndecided about
(circle or 4nderline one)
the proposed Zoping Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments _.. position:
/. I� W,'7'A/M'4'Nz
- i
Signature: Date:
Additional Signature: Date:
tt
Printed Names}:C�nite,yz TrC �t
Faust be property owners) whose rnarne(s) are printed at tap. Otherwise contact the Planning Department- One [corm per property.
Phone Number (optional): �U/ — -r �
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 7
Notification Response Form
ZA14-006
Meeting Date: February 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Steele, Crystal M Etvir Robert
1212 Casey Ct
Southlake Tx 76092
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
Lj favor of .% opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced aboveRmlved
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: �=
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s): _
Must be property owner(s) whose
FEB 21� 2014
IPIarr-p.'�,." Dept
Date:
Date:
are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 8
Usouthlalebws Mail - Paul Barham and the Westin project
�GCry
SO THL.AK
Paul Barham and the Westin project
1 ,flessacts,
Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM
To: dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Good afternoon, Dan:
This afternoon I spoke at some length with Paul Barham. First, thank you for speaking with me on Wednesday and
sharing Paul's contact info with me - it was so helpful. Second, I wanted to say how excited our family is about the
Westin project and its potential impact on development of the Casey Court properties. We've been waiting for some time
to see movement on development of the 114/N. Carroll Rd comer, and having a Westin property in Southlake seems like
a wonderful use of the acquired Gateway land. Please pass on our support for the Westin project to members of council.
I will observe the Mar. 18 meeting and plan to attend the Apr. 1 meeting. And please let me know if you need any
additional information from us.
Thank you again for your time and helpful feedback,
Robin Amerine
Co-owner
1033 Casey Court
https://mail.google.co"mail/uV017ui=2& k-219e8bdlec&ueA-pt&q=Paul%2OBarham&gs=true&search=q uery&fh=1449e2d9d0443lc3&sim1=1449e2d9d04431c3 1/1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA14-006 Page 9
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-660
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 4, GATEWAY CHURCH — 114
CAMPUS ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 6.826 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "NR-PUD"
NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AS
DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B",
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and
use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other
purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "NR-PUD" Non -
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 1
Residential Planned Unit Development District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and
effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types
of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by
requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress
points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing
on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare;
effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of
population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered
among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular
uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most
appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 2
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public
interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably
invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the
classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the
changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic,
and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and
air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and
facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that
there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined
that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close
proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land
were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning
classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote
the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and
amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 3
be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being legally described as Lot 1, Block 4, Gateway Church — 114 Campus
Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according
to the plat filed as Instrument # D210005156, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texas, being approximately 6.826 acres, and described in Exhibit "A" from "NR-
PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District to "S-P-1" Detailed
Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following conditions:
1) RESERVED FOR CITY COUNCIL MOTION
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 4
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete
hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and
its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of
buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except
in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of
the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 5
as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether
pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance
but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and
place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this
ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for
any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this
ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this
ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 18t" day of March, 2014.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 1st day of April, 2014.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA14-006 Page 7
Exhibit A
RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment G
Page 8
Exhibit B
RESERVED FOR APPROVED SITE PLAN
Case No.
ZA14-006
Attachment G
Page 9