Loading...
Item 6ACITY OF S0UTHLA1<,,,E Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT November 13, 2013 CASE NO: ZA13-107 PROJECT: Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, Jellico Square Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Armstrong Slake Randol Mill LP, Claymoore Engineering is requesting approval of a Site Plan for the construction of an approximately 5,600 square foot retail building located at 2310 W. Southlake Boulevard. SPIN Neighborhood # 11. DETAILS: Case No. ZA13-107 Claymoore Engineering is requesting construction of an approximately 5,600 located at 2310 W. Southlake Boulevard consistent with the previously approve development. No change to the zoning i zoned "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan Summary: d approval of a Site Plan for the square foot single story retail building The proposed site plan appears to be concept plan for the Jellico Square s being requested. The site is currently District. The following is the Site Data SITE DATA TABLE ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPEMENT START CONSTRUCTION JANUARY 2014 END CONSTRUCTION AUGUST 2D14 PROPERTY DATA EXISTING ZONING SP-2 EXIST NO L. U. D RETAIL COMMERCIAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 AREA OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 0.95 AC = 41.362 SF PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE (BY BLDG) 5,500 SF 141,362 SF = 13-5 AREA OF OPEN SPACE 10.217 SF = 25-0 % OUTSIDE STORAGE 01% TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 5,600 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY USE 5,600 SF (REST. I RETAIL) TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,600 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO 1 1 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 23 (11250) PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 51 (2 ADA) IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 31,145SF=75% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED BY PUD (75') ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT (24' - 2") ACTION NEEDED ATTACHMENTS STAFF CONTACT: Case No. ZA13-107 The following variance has been requested: • Pitched Roof The Overlay Section 43 of the Zoning Ordinance requires for buildings to be pitched roof if they are less than 6,000 square feet. The proposed roof shows a parapet and mansard style and the building is 5,600 square feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) subject to the staff review comments and staff report dated November 5, 2013; and granting the requested variance to the pitched roof requirement as presented. 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval Request (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — LINK TO PRESENTATION (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 5, 2013 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (F) Full Size Plans (for Planning & Zoning Commission only) Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Armstrong Slake Randol Mill LP APPLICANT: Claymoore Engineering PROPERTY SITUATION: 2310 W. Southlake Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Jellico Square Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY:-ZA78-014, Zoning of Drake Estates for Single Family Residential, approved. -ZA85-014, Rezoning of NWC of Randol Mill and F.M. 1709 (current Lots 4R1, 4R2 & 4R3) to Heavy Commercial (changed to C-3 with adoption of Ord. 480 in 1989), approved. -ZA89-044, Rezoning for Lot 6, Drake Estates to "B-2," failed. -ZA96-085, Rezoning of Stonebridge Park to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" uses in the rear of the site and "C-2" uses along F.M. 1709, approved. -ZA97-133 & 178 Final Plats of Stonebridge Park, Lot 1 and Lots 2-6 approved. -ZA00-115, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Jellico Towne Crossing (to include Super Target) to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C- 3" General Commercial uses, failed at P&Z and ultimately withdrawn by the applicant. -ZA00-125, Preliminary Plat associated with ZA00-115, failed and withdrawn. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA13-107 -ZA05-167, Rezoning and Concept Plan / Site Plan for Town Lake Crossing to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses, approved. -ZA05-168, Plat Revision for Lots 1-5, Block 1, Jellico Square, approved. -ZA09-068, Rezoning and Site Plan for Carpe Diem Preschool on Lot 5, Jellico Square, approved. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The existing development is on the northwest corner of West Southlake Boulevard (designated as a 130 foot State right of way) and Randol Mill Avenue (designated as a 140 foot State right of way parkway). Traffic Impact RandolMay 2013 traffic counts on W. Southlake Blvd. 24hr West Bound (WB) (19472) East Bound (EB) (18893) AM Peak A.M. (1308) 11:45 — 12:45 Peak A.M. (2020) 7:00 — 8:00 PM Peak P.M. (2106) 5:30 — 6:30 Peak P.M. (1092) 4:45 — 5:45 Attachment A Page 1 • Vehicle Trips Per Day, 52% & 55% entering & 55% & 45% exiting • The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on W. Southlake Boulevard TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed parking spaces and trash dumpster on the west side of the west access drive contains four (4) existing trees that are a part of the Jellico Square south bufferyard requirements. One tree will be affected and re -located with this development. There are no trees proposed to be removed with this project. SOUTHLAKE 2030: CITIZEN INPUT Consolidated Future Land Use The Southlake 2030 Consolidate Future Land Use Plan designates this area as Retail Commercial. The Retail Commercial category is a lower- to medium -intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood -type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. Pathways / Sidewalk Plan There is an existing 8-foot multi -use trail along West Southlake Blvd. A SPIN meeting was held November 4, 2013. A summary report has been included in Attachment `C' of this report. P&Z ACTION: November 7, 2013; Approved (5-1) subject to the Staff Report Summary No. 3, dated November 5, 2013 and the Staff Report dated November 5, 2013; and granting the requested variance to the pitched roof requirement as presented. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 5, 2013. NACommunity Development\MEMO\2013 Cases\107 - SP - Jellico Square Retail= Packet\Item 6A.docx Case No. Attachment A ZA13-107 Page 2 Vicinity Map Lot 1, Block 1, Jellico Square Addition J J Z C\\ Q Of N� �O Gco �2 '\, N ZA13-107 u r, Site Plan Y �• 0 280 560 1,120 Fee Case No. Attachment B ZA13-107 Page 1 Plans and Support Information ENGINEERING September 30, 2013 Mr. Dennis Killough Department of Planning & Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Site Plan Submittal — Lot 1, Black 1, Jellico Square Addition Dear Dennis: Armstrong Slake Randol Mill LP has plans to develop the 0.95 acre pad site located at the northwest corner of Southlake Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. The pad site is platted as Lot 1, Black 1 of the Jellica Square Addition, Cabinet A, Slide 21003 and is currently zoned as SP-2. The project is planned to consist of a 5,600 square foot retail & restaurant facility. This parcel was shown in the zoning, site plan, and traffic documents submitted when the center was originally developed. Thank you and please call if you have any comments or need additional information. Sin cerely, r,�, U, Matt Moore, P.E. Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 1 LOIDAIM ARCHITECT INC. 2 UI 33 U T H CALH0UH STHEIT sUIrE 12s-H r o H T W H R r H 3 E% A S 7 U 1 U 4 HIz-332-5614 FAX:817-33z-357a October 22, 2013 Lorrie Fletcher City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Roofline Variance- Jellico Square Addition ZA13-107 Mrs. Fletcher: We are requesting relief from the requirement for a pitched roof on the above referenced project for the following reasons: 1. We are anticipating up to two restaurant users, which will require additional rooftop equipment and penetrations which become difficult to nearly impossible on a pitched roof. Code required clearances for exhausts and intakes make locating equipment equally difficult. 2. A pitched roof would also require split systems for air conditioning, necessitating either a roof platform (unsightly) for condensing units, or a screened pad area for ground mounted equipment. Split systems are not as flexible or efficient in their use in commercial applications. Ground mounted equipment is vulnerable to vandalism, and its screening adds another unnecessary design element at the pedestrian level. 3. Over the life of the building, anticipating tenant changes, a flat roof — the available materials and inevitable repair, make for a much more sustainable solution. Changes in tenant demands resulting in changes in roof penetrations on a pitched roof would result in mismatched repairs over time, or complete reroofing of large sections (not economical). 4. We can produce a much more energy efficient building using rigid insulation below the roofing membrane at a more economical cost than the alternatives available to pitched roof designs given the use of the building. We would have no use for an "attic" above the ceiling, and a flat roof provides a much smaller building volume to heat and cool. S. The design we are proposing fits well With the existing buildings on the development, and we are satisfied it meets the intent of the requirement for a pitched roof form. If you have further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Regards, I Robert W. Kelly Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 2 Proposed Site Plan ©2©§. \3\4z Q lm/§ 2 \flP '! _ \ jR;§ .�-_--- -��� }§) Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 3 Landscape Plan "'N:YuN�t3"meY - 8 � a5pp�9a��{�S�Ss a a d ogs"_qv"_o9ec-_seg" 989A9AA8RftAA �� 'q= 4 ii '11�/ z it #i _pp NNypa P$ 11111pI O @;m e� � 5 � m @R gBg pYp4P O 1 i 6 ell) i if if i a SA ifi 7yw � 7 n 6 Kill €i o Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 4 �Z :•m 0 Elevations B 00 O 0000g_000pp0 z yy IR A11 ��E 9� d r l 11 51 2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR DESIGN AND REGULATORY REVIEW ONLY Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 5 ID SOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA13-107 PROJECT NAME: Jellico Square Retail SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 11 MEETING DATE: November 4, 2013; 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Fourteen (14) SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Monique Schill (SPIN #11) APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Matt Moore, Clay Moore Engineering STAFF PRESENT: Patty Moos, Planner I and Ken Baker, Senior Director of Planning and Development Services STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I: (817)748-8069 or Ifletcher(a)ci.south lake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located at the northwest corner of W. Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Road at 2310 W. Southlake Boulevard. Development Details • Concept plan for 5,600 square foot retail/restaurant including a patio area on an undeveloped lot in the Jellico Square development. This is the last parcel to be developed in this center from the concept plan approved by City Council in 2005. • The building will be a one-story structure constructed to the same materials as the main building containing the Sprouts store. • One variance will be requested to allow the roof line to match the main retail building (structures smaller than 6,000 square feet are required to have a pitched roof). The plan presented at SPIN: Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 6 Aerial View Site Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA13-107 Page 7 Building Elevations Landscape Plan QUESTIONS / CONCERNS There were no questions or concerns. (F -- 9— i i i 6:30 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. ZA13-107 Attachment C Page 8 Case No.: ZA13-107 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Three Project Name: Site Plan — Lot 1, Block 1, Jellico Square Addition APPLICANT: Claymoore Engineering Matt Moore. PE 1105 Cheek Sparger Rd., Ste 1 Colleyville, TX 76034 Phone: 817-281-0572 Date of Review: 11/05/13 OWNER: Armstrong Slake Rando Mill LP Andv McHaraue 2100 Wharton St. Ste 700 Pittsburgh, PA 15203 Phone: 813-978-8086 Email: matt@claymooreeng.com Email: amchargue@agoc.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/21/13 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LORRIE FLETCHER AT (817) 748-8069 / Ifletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us or DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072 / dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us. 1. The proposed roof shows a mansard and parapet style. The ordinance requires a pitched roof on any commercial building that is less than 6,000 square feet. The building proposed is 5,600 square feet. A variance has been requested. 2. The building footprint shown on the site plan and elevation need to match and show compliance with horizontal articulation requirements. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on September 30, 2013 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The parking spaces and trash dumpster on the west side of the west access drive will effect approximately four (4) existing trees that are a part of the Jellico Square south bufferyard requirements. Please show the locations of these trees and designate if they will be altered in Case No. Attachment D ZA13-107 Page 1 order to construct the development. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: The parking islands at the ends of the parking spaces on the south side of the building are required to contain the minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. If a light pole is present the island may contain two (2) accent trees in place of the canopy tree. 2. The south bufferyard plant material for the Jellico Square development has already been installed and existing. All that is required to be planted is the interior landscape plant material for the proposed building. Please assess the existing plant material on the site and update the submitted landscape plan. 3. Please submit a color Landscape Plan. # Denotes required items. Denotes informational items. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us No Comments Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 Email: kclements(a)ci.south lake.tx.us The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 1010812013. Comments may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system is required in an A-2 occupancy with a fire area in excess of 5,000 square feet, submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. Case No. Attachment D ZA13-107 Page 2 The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. Fire department sprinkler connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a 30 degree down elbow and a Knox locking cap. Fire Department sprinkler connections must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of Fire Lanes. All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed. Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal's Office. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (minimum of 80,000 pounds GVW) Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: No hydrant problems noted based on submitted information. Case No. Attachment D ZA13-107 Page 3 Informational Comments: No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. Development must comply with all requirements of the approved S-P-2 Zoning District regulations for Jellico Square (480-488a). Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA13-107 Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Jellico Square J ttb a �„o ti K h � M14, � �•A �M10 �s v, U � GtfM1�o MN Z m 2225 1800 y h IL D 5 ^9 , 1 Property Address 2320 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Owner Southlake Crossing Ani Clinic Zoning C3 Acreage 0.64 Response F 2 2210 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Holidan Investments Inc C2 1.04 NR 3 2310 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Armstrong Slake Rando Mill p SP2 0.91 NR 4 2300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 437 North Main Partners Lp SP2 0.82 NR 5 210 RANDOL MILL AVE 437 North Main Partners Lp SP2 3.80 NR 6 250 RANDOL MILL AVE 437 North Main Partners Lp SP2 1.75 NR 7 300 RANDOL MILL AVE Vere Southlake Equity Llc SP2 2.12 NR 8 2325 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Wendys International Inc C2 0.75 FNR 9 2301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Stanley Crossing Lp C2 1.34 NR 10 125 DAVIS BLVD Raio, Steven & Susan M C3 0.85 NR 11 2255 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Star Dunkin'Real Estate Lp C3 0.96 NR 12 2340 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD Southlake Cmc Llc SP2 0.70 F 13 155 STONEBRIDGE LN Stonebridge Monticello Prtns L SP2 0.58 NR 14 165 STONEBRIDGE LN S & S Land Holding Llc SP2 0.61 NR 15 175 STONEBRIDGE LN Stonebridge Monticello Prtns L SP2 1.43 NR 16 170 STONEBRIDGE LN First Carlyle Capital Funding SP1 4.31 NR 17 150 STONEBRIDGE LN Fscf II Llc SP1 1.36 NR NR: No Res Responses. F. In Favor O. Opposed To U. Undecided Responses Received: Two (2) — Both In Favor (please see attached) ponse Case No. Attachment E ZA13-170 Page 1 Notification Response Form ZA13-107 Meeting Date: November 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM Southlake Crossing Ani Clinic 2320 W Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx, 76092 343 4R1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: �� 7 Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): r1-. cn>r,-�,o«-, Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA13-170 Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA13-107 Meeting Date: November 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM Southlake Cmc Llc 2320 W Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx, 76092 40456K 1 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby n favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: �Q�-� _ Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): le. Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment E ZA13-170 Page 3