Item 6C and 6D (2)City of Southlake
City Council
October 15, 2013
OVERVIEW
Community Specialty Retail Property
183,750 Net Square Feet
22.5 (gross) Acres
Specialty Grocer, Community Retail, Shops &
Restaurants
Two New Public Roadways
Opening: Fall, 2014
TEAM
Developer
– The Woodmont Company
Architect
– Herschman Architects
Engineer
– Cates, Clark & Associates
Landscape Architect
– MESA
The City of Southlake
Site Plan
2 Retail
Components
– Grocer /
Community Retail
– Specialty Village
Urban streetscape
experience
Pedestrian access
Public / meeting
areas
Construction Phase Plan
Architectural Enhancements
Tower Focal Feature
DAY NIGHT
Screen Wall
Buildings F & F2
Screen Wall
“RIM” Walking Surface & Flatwork
“RIM” Material Types
Salt Sandblasted Concrete Finished Scored Concrete
Common Area Architectural Enhancements
TOTAL COST $3,792,505
throughout project $650,000
LANDSCAPING / IRRIGATION
landscaping, lighting, seating, pond aerator $132,000
DETENTION POND AMENITIES
(30) decorative light poles & fixtures $180,000
DECORATIVE LIGHTING
architectural screen walls on zena rucker road $125,000
SCREEN WALLS –ZENA RUCKER RD
architectural planters & retaining walls $248,005
RETAINING WALLS – CARROLL AVE
(30,000 sf) throughout “village” area $210,000
PAVERS/STAMPED CONCRETE
(95,000 sf) inclusive of upcharge for colored $427,500
concrete in “village” area
CONCRETE – COLOR
(50) located at corner of fm 1709 & carroll ave & $50,000
throughout the “village” area
DECORATIVE BOLLARDS
(25) raised pot planters located in “rim & village” $100,000
areas
PLANTERS –POTS
(8) Raised planters in “village” area $40,000
PLANTERS –CAST IN PLACE
architectural / decorative seating located $100,000
throughout project
SEATING
(1) located in the “rim” area $150,000
ARCHITECTURAL TOWER FEATURE
(1) located in the village area $20,000
FIRE PIT
(2) totaling 84 sf located in the “village” area $60,000
LINEAR FOUNTAIN
(1) 600 sf fountain located east of building “n” $200,000
INTERIOR FOUNTAIN
(1) 3,000 sf fountain @ corner of fm 1709 & carroll $1,100,000
ave
SIGNATURE FOUNTAIN
Project Amenities
The Developer shall be obligated to construct/deliver the “Project
Amenities”, as defined on the preceding schedule, in conjunction with
overall Development:
– Within 30 days of the City’s issuance of the first building permit in the
Development, the Developer would provide letter of credit (“LOC”), in a
form acceptable to the City, in the amount of the estimated cost of the yet‐
to‐be‐constructed Project Amenities, naming The City as the beneficiary.
– The LOC shall be subsequently reduced by the amount of each Project
Amenity upon completion of such Amenity.
– The LOC shall automatically expire/terminate upon completion of all the
Project Amenities.
– Should the Developer fail to complete all Project Amenities within 18
months following the issuance of the first building permit, the City shall
then have the right draw upon the LOC and cause for the construction of
the Project Amenities that are then‐outstanding.
– Developer shall provide the City with a temporary construction easement,
in a form acceptable to the City, to allow the City (and its contractors) to
enter upon the Development property to complete the Project Amenities
by an agreed upon date.
Construction Access Plan
Parking Standards & Demand
“The fact that a customer usually visits several stores during a single shopping trip and the rate of
turnover of the spaces distinguish parking requirements for shopping centers from those of
freestanding commercial enterprises.
Parking standards are expressed as a parking ratio—the number of parking spaces per 1,000 square
feet (93 square meters) of GLA in a shopping center. GLA is a known and realistic factor for
measuring the adequacy of parking provisions in relation to retail use.
Based on a comprehensive study of parking requirements for shopping center conducted by ULI and
the International Council of Shopping Centers in 1999, the following base parking standards are
recommended for a typical shopping center today:
Four spaces per 1,000 square feet (93 square meters) of GLA for centers with a GLA of fewer than
400,000 square feet (37,175 square meters)
The parking ratios presented above apply to centers that have no more than 10 percent of their GLA
occupied by restaurants, entertainment venues, and/or cinema space. For centers where these uses
occupy 11 to 20 percent of GLA, a linear incremental increase of .03 space per 1,000 square feet (93
square meters) for each percent above 10 percent is recommended.”1
Our proposal reflects a restaurant percentage to the total size of 18.21%; therefore, the Center
should have an overall parking ratio of 4.24 parking spots. ([18.21% ‐ 10%] = 8.21 x .03 = .24 + 4 =
4.24)
– 1 Retail Development, Fourth Edition by Urban Land Institute ‐ ULI Development Handbook Series, Copyright
2008, (Chapter 4. Planning and Design, Pages 152, 153)
Material Types & Site Plan Key
Brick
Cultured Stone
Ceramic Tile Accents
Cast Stone
Architectural Metals
Grocer / Community
Buildings A, B & C
Community
Building D
Community
Buildings E & E2
Community
Buildings F & F2
The Village
The Village
Interior Village Perspective
Village
Buildings I, J & K
Village
Buildings L & M
Village
Building N
Village
Building N
Village
Building N
Village
Building O
Village
Building O
Village
Building O
Zena Rucker Road
West View Perspective
Zena Rucker Road
Building F South & F2 East Elevation
Hardscape / Landscape
Hardscape / Landscape
Interior View Perspective
Custom Benches
Custom Benches
Fire Pits
Plaza Gateway Fountain
Corner Fountain Perspective
Village Center Fountain
Linear Water Features
Pedestrian Experience
Village Center Experience
Enhanced Paving Materials
Shade Structures
THANK YOU
PARK VILLAGE PARKING ANALYSIS
10.1.2013
building area less storage
net retail /
restaurant area net retail area
Building Total Sub Total Retail Sales Area
Serving & Kitchen
Area
Building A 21,006 (6,186) 14,820 14,820 0
Building B 22,205 (3,800) 18,405 18,405 0
Building E 20,503 (1,077) 19,426 19,426 0
Building C 3,142 (471) 2,671 2,671 0
Building D 10,658 (1,614) 9,044 9,044 0
Building E2 11,298 (1,732) 9,566 9,566 0
Building F 8,710 (1,314) 7,396 7,396 0
Building F2 9,618 (1,450) 8,168 4,768 3,400
Building O 25,336 (4,040) 21,296 13,773 7,523
Building N 15,666 (2,402) 13,264 5,231 8,033
Building M 6,447 (1,050) 5,397 3,697 1,700
Building L 4,993 (749) 4,244 0 4,244
Building K 5,688 (853) 4,835 0 4,835
Building J 9,057 (1,143) 7,914 7,914 0
Building I 8,973 (1,431) 7,542 7,542 0
LL Space 450 (68) 382 382 0
Totals 183,750 (29,380) 154,369 124,635 29,734
100.00% ‐15.99% 84.01% 67.83% 16.18%
storage areas are est. at 15%
net restaurant area
Method: Park Village... (Net GLA at 1 per 200 SF) + (Storage areas at 1 per 1,000)
Method: Urban Land Institute... (see narrative)
([16.18% ‐ 10%] = 6.18 x .03 = .1854 + 4 = 4.1854) = 769 Parking Spaces
( 154,369 SF ÷ 200 ) + ( 29,380 ÷ 1,000 ) = 801 Parking Spaces
( 124,635 SF ÷ 200 ) + ( 29,734 ÷ 100 ) + ( 29,380 ÷ 1,000 ) = 950 Parking Spaces ‐ 10% Variance = 854 Parking Spaces
Method: Shops at Soutlake… (Gross BSF at 1 per 200)
Method: City Ordinance… (Net Retail GLA at 1 per 200) + (Net Restaurant at 1 per 100) + (Storage Areas at 1 per 1,000)
( 183,750 SF ÷ 200 ) = 919 Parking Spaces ‐ 10% Variance = 827 Parking Spaces
Parking Standards & Demand
“The fact that a customer usually visits several stores during a single shopping trip and the rate of
turnover of the spaces distinguish parking requirements for shopping centers from those of
freestanding commercial enterprises.
Parking standards are expressed as a parking ratio—the number of parking spaces per 1,000 square
feet (93 square meters) of GLA in a shopping center. GLA is a known and realistic factor for
measuring the adequacy of parking provisions in relation to retail use.
Based on a comprehensive study of parking requirements for shopping center conducted by ULI and
the International Council of Shopping Centers in 1999, the following base parking standards are
recommended for a typical shopping center today:
Four spaces per 1,000 square feet (93 square meters) of GLA for centers with a GLA of fewer than
400,000 square feet (37,175 square meters)
The parking ratios presented above apply to centers that have no more than 10 percent of their GLA
occupied by restaurants, entertainment venues, and/or cinema space. For centers where these uses
occupy 11 to 20 percent of GLA, a linear incremental increase of .03 space per 1,000 square feet (93
square meters) for each percent above 10 percent is recommended.”1
Our proposal reflects a restaurant percentage to the total size of 18.11%; therefore, the Center
should have an overall parking ratio of 4.24 parking spots. ([18.11% ‐ 10%] = 8.11 x .03 = .2433 + 4 =
4.2433)
– 1 Retail Development, Fourth Edition by Urban Land Institute ‐ ULI Development Handbook Series, Copyright
2008, (Chapter 4. Planning and Design, Pages 152, 153)
City of Southlake will issue certificates of
occupancy for up to 120,000 SF of space until
the following amenities are completed:
– One (1) 3,000 SF fountain at the NEC of the
project
– One (1) 600 SF fountain east of Building N
– Two (2) 45 SF fountain features
– Twelve (12) seating benches
– Impervious hardscape in the “village” area,
sidewalks and drive ways constructed with
integral colored concrete and other upgraded
materials