Loading...
2013-09-23 Meeting Report (Peyton Place) SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. Formal Submittal Pending PROJECT NAME: Peyton Place SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 9 MEETING DATE: September 23, 2013; 7:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Seventeen (17) SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry #7 APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Tom Matthews STAFF PRESENT: Patty Moos, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation: Located at 859 and 911 S. White Chapel Blvd. and the east portion of 921 S. White Chapel Blvd., north of East Continental Blvd. Development Details Concept Plan for 18.5 acre project with 10 residential lots of at least 1 acre. Three large lots along S. White Chapel divided to add 7 residential lots to the east. Entrance will be off S. White Chapel Blvd. with an enhanced entrance design. The plan presented at SPIN: Preliminary Concept Plan Aerial Concept Plan QUESTIONS / CONCERNS What is the current zoning for the properties? RE (5 acre lot), Ag, and SF-1. Developer will be asking for a zoning change for the Î project. Will all lots be platted at once? All lots will be platted with the exception of the southwest lot 1.2 acre lot located behind Î 921 S. White Chapel Blvd. This lot will be preliminary platted and owned by the current property owner until he decides to sell. He cannot final plat this lot because the lot contains his horse barn on the property line. When he sells, the barn will be removed as part of the final plat for the lot. Who are the owners of the properties? Drew Johnson owns 921 S. White Chapel Blvd., Rob Dean owns 859 and 911 S. White Î Chapel Blvd. Concerns about a negative impact of development on property values, noise, visibility to large homes and privacy. Residents state that they had paid a premium price on their lots to back up to the larger open lots. Concerns about drainage from the north, rates of flow on property, standing water in existing ponds, existing wildlife in ponds, and location of new ponds. Developer will address the drainage as part of the development plan with engineering Î studies. Site will be required to accept water from adjacent properties. Concerns about easements, drainage and utility, and will they be provided for the site. City will require easements for utilities and drainage. Easements will be determined in Î final plat. Question on if there will be building setbacks? Yes, will have building setbacks per zoning. Î Concerns about new ponds being located adjacent to current properties and West Nile virus and mosquitos. What type of fencing will be installed against existing properties? Not masonry, open or wood fences or further discussion with adjacent property owners. Î Traffic concerns on S. White Chapel Blvd. with new development. Will these lots be on septic or on the city sewer? Aerobic systems or sewer are possibilities depending on the location of existing city Î sewer lines and connections. Lot must have a minimum of a one acre lot for aerobic system. Tarrant County monitors these systems. Possible connection for sewer from Timarron or Princeton Park. What are the sizes of the homes on the lots and their cost? 6000 sf minimum and $1.5 million approx. Î Will the development have a HOA? Yes, for maintenance and regulatory enforcement. Î Will this be a dated community? No, the city does not allow gated communities any more. Î Who will regulate the ponds? HOA, but developer not sure of the regulations for the pond. Î Will subdividing the properties affect the number of horses kept on the property? Î What is the process and time frame for the development? Not sure, developer has not submitted an application for zoning and the preliminary plat, Î typically 75-90 days from submittal. He will run the zoning and preliminary plat applications concurrently. Can we voice our opinion? Yes, at Planning and Zoning and City Council meetings. Î Deed restrictions will be placed on property for materials, paving, and landscape Will there be underground utilities? Yes. Î Concern about production builders in the development. Custom builders only. Î Meeting presentation adjourned at 8:05 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.