2013-04-08 Meeting Report (Stonebridge Park Southlake, Phase 11)
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
N/A Formal application pending
PROJECT NAME:
Stonebridge Park Southlake, Phase II
SPIN DISTRICT:
SPIN # 11
MEETING DATE:
April 8, 2013; 7:00 PM
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3C 3D
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Five (5)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Monique Schill # 11
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Jay Holman
STAFF PRESENT:
Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I; Terry Carpenter, Officer DPS
STAFF CONTACT:
Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I: (817)748-8069 or lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at 100-125 River Oaks Drive.
Development Details
Revised Site Plan for S-P-2 with Office existing development
The purpose of this request is to allow smaller buildings on separate existing lots
Presented at SPIN:
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
What kind of fencing will be in the back?
Whatever is in place with the existing approved S-P-2 zoning; not sure but I
Î
believe it is wrought iron with screening
Why do they want the lot all the way in the back?
.
Î
What is the setback?
Whatever is in the S-P-2 zoning; I believe it is 20 feet.
Î
Will there be parking in the back?
Not likely; the development is already over parked.
Î
What about the creek?
The development is pretty much complete; there may eventually be a small
Î
bridge built to accommodate the creek and remaining lot.
What is office parking?
I think it is 2 to 1
Î
What about trash bins?
The trash bins will be individually managed. I do not anticipate a lot of trash being
Î
generated from such a low impact use.
What about lighting?
The lighting already exists today
Î
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.