Loading...
2013-04-08 Meeting Report (Stonebridge Park Southlake, Phase 11) SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. N/A Formal application pending PROJECT NAME: Stonebridge Park Southlake, Phase II SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 11 MEETING DATE: April 8, 2013; 7:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3C 3D TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Five (5) SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Monique Schill # 11 APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Jay Holman STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I; Terry Carpenter, Officer DPS STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I: (817)748-8069 or lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation The property is located at 100-125 River Oaks Drive. Development Details Revised Site Plan for S-P-2 with Office existing development The purpose of this request is to allow smaller buildings on separate existing lots Presented at SPIN: QUESTIONS / CONCERNS What kind of fencing will be in the back? Whatever is in place with the existing approved S-P-2 zoning; not sure but I Î believe it is wrought iron with screening Why do they want the lot all the way in the back? . Î What is the setback? Whatever is in the S-P-2 zoning; I believe it is 20 feet. Î Will there be parking in the back? Not likely; the development is already over parked. Î What about the creek? The development is pretty much complete; there may eventually be a small Î bridge built to accommodate the creek and remaining lot. What is office parking? I think it is 2 to 1 Î What about trash bins? The trash bins will be individually managed. I do not anticipate a lot of trash being Î generated from such a low impact use. What about lighting? The lighting already exists today Î SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.