1998-06-18 P&Z Meeting 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING
June 18, 1998
COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Ann Creighton, Vice-Chairman James Murphy, and
Commissioners Rob Jones, F. C. LeVrier, C. D. Peebles, Mike Sandlin, and Keith Shankland
COMMISSION ABSENT: None
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Debra Drayovitch, City Manager Curtis E. Hawk,
Community Development Director CJreg Last, Public Works Director Bob Whitehead, Interim Parks
and Recreation Director Kevin Hugman, Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, Deputy Director of
Public Works Charlie Thomas, Comprehensive Planner Stefanie Sarakaitis, Staff Engineer Angela
Turner, Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell
There was no Work Session held.
The Executive Session started at 6:13 p.m. and ended at 6:55 p.m. There was no action taken as a
result of the Executive Session.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Creighton at 7:06 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM #2. APPROVAL OF M1NUTES:
Chairman Creighton opened discussion of the minutes of the June 4, 1998, Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
Motion was made to approve the June 4, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes,
as presented.
Motion:
Second:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Sandlin
Jones
Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Creighton
None
Murphy
Approved: 6-0-1
Motion carried.
(Plarming and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #0033)
AGENDA ITEM ~3. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS:
Community Development Director Greg Last stated that we have again qualified with the Texas
Chapter of the American Planning Association for Planning Excellence Recognition. He said this
is the first year that they have adopted this award State-wide. He stated that one component of this
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 1 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
3O
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
._44
award is the Commission's training and complimented Commissioners LeVrier and Jones for having
completed the Council of Governments five-part training series.
AGENDA ITEM #4. ZA 98~055. FINAL PLAT OF PINE MEADOW ESTATES:
AGENDA ITEM # 8. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE. ORDINANCE NO. 480-BB;
AGENDA ITEM #13. ZA 97-142. PLAT REVISION FOR PROPOSED LOTS 1R3R1.1R3R2.
1R3R3. AND 2. BLOCK 1. KIMBALL/1709 ADDITION. AND
AGENDA ITEM #14. ZA 98-038. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK
61. TIMARRON ADDITION. PHASE V:
Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA 98-055, ZA 97-142, and ZA 98-038 and to
continue the Public Hearings to the July 9, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and
to table Ordinance No. 480-BB and to continue the Public Hearing to August 6, 1998, Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting.
Motion: Murphy
Second: LeVrier
Ayes: Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Creighton
Nays: None
Approved: 7-0
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #0115)
Agenda Item #5 was on the Consent Agenda. Chairman Creighton stepped down from Agenda Item
#5, ZA 98-059, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided.
AGENDA ITEM #5. ZA 98-059. FINAL PLAT FOR LOT 1. BLOCK 1. CORNERSTONE
BUSINESS PARK. PHASE II:
Community Development Director Greg Last stated that the applicant's engineer stated that he will
comply with all Review Comments.
Motion was made to approve ZA 98-059, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 12,
1998.
Motion:
Second:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
LeVrier
Jones
LeVfier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Sandlin, Murphy
None
Creighton
Approved: 6-0-1
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #0239)
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 2 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Chairman Creighton resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
AGENDA ITEM #6. ZA 98-051. FINAL PLAT FOR LOTS 1-6. BLOCK 1. HARRELL PLACE:
Comprehensive Planner Stefanie Sarakaitis informed the Commission that this request is for a Final
Plat of property legally described as Tract lC situated in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18,
and being approximately 5.8438 acres. This plat proposes six (6) residential lots. The property is
located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Johnson Road and Harrell Drive. The Current
Zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District and "SF-30" Single Family Residential
District. The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential. The Owner and Applicant is DDFW
Properties.
Ed Childress (LandCon, Inc.) 2501 Parkview Drive, Suite 610, Fort Worth, Texas, presented this
item to the Commission. He stated that they will comply with all of the Staff Review Comments.
He said that since the last P&Z meeting, he has met with City of Southlake staff, including the Parks
Department, adjoining property owners, and Keller I.S.D. engineers and City staff.
Although this case is not a Public Hearing, Chairman Creighton opened the floor to anyone who
wished to speak.
L.D. Tucker, 3300 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated that the meeting he had with the developers
produced nothing new. He stated that he has 35' of property that he cannot do anything with but pay
taxes on it. He asked the Commission to deny this request until the City or the developers do
something to help the drainage problems.
Commissioner Jones asked Mr. Tucker how much of the 35' of property he mentioned is in a
drainage easement, and Mr. Tucker stated that all of it is in a drainage easement.
Bobby Butler, 3210 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated that he met with the developer, Bob
Whitehead, and Angela Turner. He was told in that meeting that the area behind his house was
designed to be a detention area for runoff and it would not be changed. He stated that he is more
concemed now than he has ever been. He asked the Commission to deny this request until
something can be resolved.
Commissioner LeVrier asked Mr. Butler how long the water sits in this easement after the rain has
stopped. Mr. Butler stated that it will continue to flow through for 30 minutes to an hour, but there
are areas in the easement where water stands for days. Commissioner LeVrier asked him to estimate
how close the easement is to his house and to estimate the floor elevation in relation to the water
level elevation in the easement. Mr. Butler stated that the easement was approximately 50' from his
house, and the floor of his house was approximately 1' (one foot) higher than the water level in the
easement.
Donald McMoy, 3200 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated that the drainage plans are not any
different than they were one year ago. He asked the Commission to deny this request until
something can be worked out.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 3 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
City Manager Curtis E. Hawk stated the City Council is aware of the drainage easement on the
property and the ditch that needs to be there if it is constructed according to the plans for the
Cimarron Acres subdivision. At the Preliminary Plat stage, he stated that he made a commitment
to the homeowners that before this proposed subdivision gets built, the City will take the drainage
ditch back to the original design of the ditch. He asked that the homeowners stay involved with this
project through the Developers Agreement at City Council where the drainage issues will be
addressed again. He said if there is something the City Council wants done differently relating to
drainage, they can make that decision at that time. He told the homeowners that the City will make
every attempt to make sure they are at the City Council meeting when the Developers Agreement
is negotiated.
Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that the Dominion subdivision had similar concerns and problems
and as a result of the Developers Agreement process at City Council, there were things that were
done differently to alleviate some of those problems. He stated that he understands where the
homeowners are coming from, but he has seen the City react to a very similar situation and take steps
to help accommodate the concerns of the homeowners.
Chairman Creighton stated that the Commission is very concerned about the homeowners problems,
but it is the City Engineer's opinion that the applicant meets the requirements of the Drainage
Ordinance and the Commission is not in a position to offer a different opinion. She asked that
homeowners to follow this tl~ough to the Developer's Agreement stage at City Council. She said
she understands some of the homeowners may not have realized when they purchased their property,
that it had a pond area designated on the back of it.
Commissioner LeVrier stated that the simple fact that this item was removed from the Consent
Agenda and the homeowners voiced their concerns at two (2) meetings, the City Council will take
note of the situation. He said that by the time this item gets to the Developers Agreement stage, the
City Council will be well aware of the concerns. He asked that the homeowners follow it through
the process and voice their concems to the City Council, too.
Commissioner Peebles stated that the Commission was short on information two (2) weeks ago; they
have been supplied with additional information since that time, and they find it clear that they cannot
deny this plat.
Motion was made to approve ZA 98-051 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 29,
1998.
Motion: Jones
Second: Murphy
Ayes: Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Murphy, Sandlin, LeVrier, Creighton
Nays: None
Approved: 7-0
Motion carried.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 4 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
(Plaiming and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #0999)
AGENDA ITEM #7. Clarification of the Trail System Master Plan designating the side of the road
to locate trails in accordance with the recommendations of the Trail System Master Plan.
Interim Parks and Recreation Director Kevin Hugman presented this item to the Commission, He
stated that in putting the guidelines together, the Parks Board considered existing trails, existing
features, existing terrain, and the safety of cross-over points.
Commissioner Peebles asked Mr. Hugman if he believes he is only required to have the trail on one
(1) side of the street, and Mr. Hugman stated that is true. Commissioner Peebles asked why he feels
that way. Mr. Hugman stated the cross-sections for the arterials in the Trail System Master Plan
only show it on one (1) side of the road.
Chairman Creighton asked Mr. Hugman what the thinking was in putting the trail on the south side
of F.M. 1709 across from Bicentennial Park. He stated that it seemed to make sense to put it on the
south side of F.M. 1709 due to terrain and other reasons. He said when they expand Bicentennial
Park, they will more than likely have a trail on the east side of Shady Oaks so that access would be
provided to the park. He stated that there will also be a light at the intersection of Shady Oaks and
F.M. 1709 so it makes a good transition point. He said that once the park is expanded, it will
probably have a sidewalk along the south side of the park.
Vice-Chairman Murphy asked if there is anyway to go under F.M. 1709 in the huge drainage
easement at the entrance to the park. Director Last stated that there are ways to construct culverts
underneath the roadways, but there are fairly significant costs involved. He said that there is water
running continuously in that ditch.
Commissioner Peebles asked ifF.M. 1709 has enough R.O.W. to hold trails on both sides. Director
Last stated that F.M. 1709 has the physical capacity to hold trails on both sides, but that apparently
was not the Park Board's intent.
Chairman Creighton stated that she is very concerned that children will cross F.M. 1709 in order to
get to the park at a location that is not a controlled intersection. She asked if the Park Board
considered that possibility and, if so, what was their position. Mr. Hugman stated that they did
consider that, but with the trails along Shady Oaks and White Chapel, they wanted the transition
areas to be at those locations.
Commissioner Jones stated that the City is asking for trouble by putting a trail on the south side, a
park on the north side, and five (5) lanes of traffic in between.
Chairman Creighton stated that there should at least be a sidewalk on both sides of F.M. 1709.
Director Last stated that if the Commission wants sidewalks on both sides of F.M. 1709, then there
needs to be a revision to the trail plan. He said the Commission could recommend a revision to the
trail plan in their motion, but it is probably outside the scope of clarification of the sidewalks.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 5 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
~'~3
_4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Chairman Creighton stated that children coming from Timberlake subdivision who are trying to get
to the soccer fields at the park will not use Shady Oaks and White Chapel; they will use the trail on
the south side of F.M. 1709 until they are across the street from the park, and then dart across the
street.
Mr. Hugman stated that the Park Board considered all of these same concerns and decided the best
option was to put a trail on the south side of F.M. 1709. He said that the Park Board indicated they
would probably build a sidewalk on the park property, thereby providing for pedestrian access in that
manner.
Commissioner Sandlin stated that he believes the Commission is going through the same process
and the same discussion that the Park Board did and will probably end up with the same conclusions.
Commissioner Shankland stated that he does not foresee children going to a light, punching a button,
and waiting to cross the street. He said if the City has the funds and the ability to put a sidewalk on
the north side of the street, then they are better off doing that than having a child get hit by a car.
Mr. Hugman stated that he thinks the Park Board would agree with the Commission in wanting a
sidewalk on the north side of F.M. 1709.
Director Last stated that the Commission could always recommend further evaluation of crossing
at Bicentennial Park, a sidewalk on the north side of F.M. 1709, activated lights between the north
and south sides, etc., but they should not attach these issues to this item.
Commissioner Jones stated that he is certain the Park Board went through exactly the same
deliberations as the Commission is, and he is almost afraid to second-guess them on this issue.
Chairman Creighton opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
Chairman Creighton closed the Public Hearing.
Motion was made approve the clarification of the Trail System Master Plan designating the side of
the road to locate trails in accordance with the recommendations of the Trail System Master Plan.
Motion: Sandlin
Second: Murphy
Ayes: Shankland, Jones, Murphy, Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Creighton
Nays: None
Approved: 7-0
Motion carried.
Chairman Creighton asked that the Parks Board and/or the City Council give some thought to the
possible location of sidewalks on the north side of F.M. 1709 generally between the areas of North
Peytonville and White Chapel with possible consideration given to over or under pass sidewalk
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 6 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
crossings. She stated that one of the Commission's concerns was the safe transit of children from
the neighborhoods to the north and south of F.M. 1709 and their access to Bicentennial Park.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #2252)
Chairman Creighton called for a break at 8:19 p.m.
Chairman Creighton called the meeting back to order at 8:34 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM #9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS. ORDINANCE NO. 48(~-CC:
Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy presented this item to the Commission. The Commission
primarily discussed roof design standards, location of trash receptacles, and mechanical equipment
screening.
Commissioner Jones stated that he is concerned that this ordinance deals entirely with aesthetics and
questioned whether or not the City should be doing this.
Commissioner LeVrier asked if the word "footprint" could be added following the words "6,000
square feet" in Section 3.1 (b). Ms. Gandy stated that she would add it.
Chairman Creighton opened the Public Hearing.
Wayne Haney (SPIN Representative #15) 400 Brock, Southlake, Texas, stated that, as a resident, he
is in favor of this ordinance, but as a SPIN representative, he has received several calls about this
ordinance specifically pertaining to The Remington case which still has a Second Reading at City
Council. He said that the people calling him have said if this ordinance is passed before The
Remington is passed, then it (The Remington) will not be able to go forward due to the residential
adjacency standards; they are worried that it will shrink it to the point that they will no longer be
financially able to do it. He asked if it was possible that the wording was designed in such a way
to hinder The Remington project.
Ms. Gandy stated that she does not think that is the case at all. She said this ordinance began back
in 1995 as The Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance. She does not think that there is any attempt
at all to get this ordinance rushed through specifically for that project.
Commissioner Jones asked staff if this ordinance would negatively impact The Remington. Ms.
Gandy stated that if the City Council chooses to impose the 4:1 setback requirements on that project,
then it will have a definite impact on them.
Commissioner LeVrier asked when this ordinance would be imposed on a case that has already been
submitted. Director Last stated that there is not a vesting statute by legislature but the ethical and
moral thing to do, typically, would be to allow cases to move through the process under the rules
they are in.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 7 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Commissioner Jones stated that if, in fact, the City Council is about to deny The Remington, he
would like to table this item to the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. He said Mr.
Haney brought up a perfectly legitimate point, and he feels the Commission should let The
Remington move forward under the rules it started with.
Chairman Creighton stated that she is perfectly comfortable with the City Council making its own
decisions regarding how these standards apply to The Remington. She stated that the Commission
is constantly faced with new properties coming forward and holding this ordinance back allows the
opportunity for even more properties to come forward.
Commissioner Peebles asked if they could limit the start date of this ordinance in such a way that
it would only apply to applications received after a certain date. City Attorney Debra Drayovitch
stated that could be done. She suggested the following wording, "The terms of this ordinance shall
apply for all submittals following the effective date of this ordinance."
Chairman Creighton closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Peebles asked for a definition of the word "footprint." Ms. Gandy stated that she
would add that definition.
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-CC, adding a definition for "footprint" in Section
1; adding the word "footprint" after the words "6,000 square feet" in Section 3.1 (B); and stipulating
that the terms of this ordinance shall apply for all submittals following the effective date of this
ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
myes~
Nays:
Approved:
mumhy
Sandlin
Murphy, Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Creighton
Jones
6-1
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #4868)
AGENDA ITEM #10. ZA 98~047. REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE TRAILHEAD:
Comprehensive Planner Stefanie Sarakaitis informed the Commission that this request is for a
Zoning Change on property legally described as being Tracts 6A, 7A, and 7B, situated in the J. J.
Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 19.006 acres. The property is located
on the north side of Johnson Road approximately 180' east of Warrington Lane. The Current Zoning
is "AG" Agricultural District. The Requested Zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential
District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The Owners of the properties are
Jack Johnson (Tracts 7A and 7B) and Hollis Johnson (Tract 6A), The Applicant is Fred Joyce-Mary
Myers Enterprises, Inc. Twenty (20) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 8 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~-~3
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
notification area, and two (2) responses were received with one (1) being undecided and one (1)
being opposed.
Fred Joyce, 455 Randol Mill Avenue, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission.
Mr. Joyce submitted a new plan for the Commission's review. He stated that City staff has not had
the opportunity to review this new plan.
Commissioner Peebles stated that he likes this new plan much better, but he would like to see
Review Comments on it.
Director Last stated that he can see there are not very many issues, and if the Commission feels
comfortable, they could approve the zoning and concept plan and give direction to the applicant to
resubmit before City Council.
Commissioner Sandlin stated that he still does not agree with the setback lines shown, but he would
like to approve the zoning tonight and defer the approval of setback lines to the platting stage.
Director Last stated that another item to consider is if the applicant tables his plat, it will be the
second tabling and due to the requirements of Case Resolution No. 97-22, he will be required to go
to the bottom of the next agenda. He stated that since the next agenda is already full, he most likely
will not be heard. He stated that if the Commission gave staff direction to place the plat high on the
agenda, they probably could do that since it is a plat.
Commissioner Sandlin stated that this is a much better plan than before, and he would like to give
Mr. Joyce somewhat of a comfort level by knowing that at least he has the zoning approved.
Commissioner Peebles asked staff if the Commission approves the zoning based on the plan Mr.
Joyce presented tonight, then could they require him to bring something very close to the
configuration of that plan back at the Preliminary Plat stage. Director Last stated that they could.
Although the Public Hearing was previously closed, Chairman Creighton allowed anyone in the
audience the opportunity to speak.
Wayne Haney, (SPIN Representative #15) 400 Brock Drive, Southlake, Texas, reminded the
Commission of a previous commitment by Mr. Joyce to increase the height of fencing along Gaylord
Johnson's property to 8'.
Mr. Joyce agreed saying that he agreed to place an 8' fence along the east side of Lots 23, 24, and
25 adjacent to Gaylord Johnson's property.
Motion was made to approve ZA 98-047, subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated
June 12, 1998, in accordance with the geometry presented tonight; deferring all requirements relating
to the Subdivision Ordinance until review of the Preliminary Plat at the next meeting; and
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 9 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
acknowledging the applicant's agreement to place an 8' fence along the east side of Lots 23, 24, and
25 adjacent to Gaylord Johnson's property.
Motion:
Second:
Ayes;
Nays:
Approved:
Jones
Sandlin
Murphy, Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Creighton
None
7-0
Motion carded.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #6393)
AGENDA ITEM #11. ZA 98-048. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE TRAILHEAD:
Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA 98-048 and to continue the Public Hearing
to the July 9, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and requesting that it be placed at
the beginning of the agenda.
Motion:
Second:
Ayes:
Nays:
Approved:
Murphy
Jones
Sandlin, LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Murphy, Creighton
None
7-0
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #6533)
Chairman Creighton called for a break at 10:15 p.m.
Chairman Creighton called the meeting back to order at 10:22 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM #12. ZA 98-056. REZONING:
Comprehensive Planner Stefanie Sarakaitis informed the Commission that this request is for a
Zoning Change on property legally described as Tract 1D situated in the Absolom H. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. 299, and being approximately 2.477 acres. The property is located on the south
side of East Dove Street approximately 620' west of North Carroll Avenue. The Current Zoning is
"AG" Agricultural District. The Requested Zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District.
The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential. The Owners and Applicants are Michael E.
and Cynthia L. Miller. Eight (8) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'
notification area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor.
Cynthia Miller, 1459 Flamingo Circle, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission.
She stated that they are wanting to build one residence on this property.
Commissioner Peebles asked why it is necessary to have a zoning change just to build one house.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 10 of 11
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
-""3
~4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
37
38
39
4O
41
44
45
,~.46
Director Last stated that in order to get a building permit, the property is required to be platted,
and in order for it to be platted, it must have adequate zoning.
Chairman Creighton opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
Chairman Creighton closed the Public Heating.
Motion was made to approve ZA 98-056.
Motion:
Second:
Ayes:
Nays:
Approved:
Murphy
Sandlin
LeVrier, Peebles, Shankland, Jones, Murphy, Sandlin, Creighton
None
7-0
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #6791)
DUE TO CASE RESOLUTION NO. 97-22, THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE NOT
HEARD ON THIS AGENDA AND WERE CONTINUED TO JULY 9, 1998:
Case #ZA 98-025, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR WALGREEN'S, on property legally
described as a portion of Tract 5D2 situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899,
and Lot 1A2A1, Block 1, Dilg Place Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, Tan'ant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.818 acres. (The Public Hearing was held
and closed on May 7, 1998)
Case #ZA 98-058, SITE PLAN FOR FRENCH SQUARE OFFICE COMPLEX, on property legally
described as Tract 5E situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being
approximately 6.1441 acres. (Public Hearing)
AGENDA ITEM # 16. MEETING ADJOURNMENT:
Chairman Creighton adjourned the meeting at 10:27 p.m. on June 18, 1998.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-18-98, tape 1, section #6795)
ATTEST:
Lori A. Farwell
Community Development Secretary
L:\COMDE V~WP-F1LEShMTGhMIN~ 1998\06-18-98 .'6rpD
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 18, 1998 Page 11 of 11
CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY O F~-.A4~-./~3-~ §
I, ~M/,-~ ~' ~[~ asamember°fthe~~~~'' make ~is affidavit
and hereby on oath state the folloWin=: [ have a substantial interest in a business enti~ or real ~rope~ as defined in
Chapter 171, Texas Local Gove~ent Code, and a vote is to be taken or a decision ts to be made that will have a
special econo~c effect on this business enti~ or real prope~.
The agenda item affecting this business entiW or real prope~ is:
COMPLETE (A)or (B): (A) ~e business enti~ is ~~~t~ ~e); or
(B) The real prope~ is located
I have a substantial interest for ~e follow~g reasons: (check all which ~e applicable)
Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity.
Ownership of 10% or more or $15,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity.
Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year.
Real property is involved and I have an equitable or legal ownership of the property with a fair
mgrket value of at least 52,500.
A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or real property that would
be affected,bYr~ decision of the,,pqbl, ic body of which I am a member.
U'-p~n filing oft'his affi{5'~vit with the City S~retary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision
involving this business entity or real property and from any further participation on this matter by discussion or debate.
Signedthis t~Oe~ayof~]~ ~ , 19~
The State of ~l~e,/_a6 §
Countyof "l~a c ra ~-¢ § ~ ,.._
Before me ~.;;;~ ~.' 0~-ql',~,.I.~/¥,. on this day personally appeared
~ ~ ~ 1<'. (axp~/,,-COx. knov/n to me (or proved to me on the oath of or
through ~ .(description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this [ {3J'l"' day of ~ct v~ p__., A.D. I~ ~.
oran/Public ~
OF ?F.X~,S ~
mm. Exp. 10/27A)1