Item 6BCITY OF
SOUTHLAI<,-E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
March 27, 2013
CASE NO: ZA13-001
PROJECT: Site Plan- Memo Corporation
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
REQUEST
DETAILS:
Case No.
ZA13-001
Memo Corporation is requesting approval of a Site Plan for the purpose of
constructing a 22,474 square foot addition to an existing building located at 722
S. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
The applicant is proposing an addition of approximately 8,694 square feet of
office space and approximately 13,780 square feet of warehousing space. The
proposed addition will result in 53,748 square feet of overall building area. The
proposed building materials comply with the Residential Adjacency Overlay
requirements. Development will be consistent with the following Site Data
Summary Chart:
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning
Lt. Industrial
w/ Res. Ad',
Land Use Designation I Med.
Dens. Resid
Net / Gross acreage
3,44 acres
Number of Proposed Lots
1 lot
Area of Open Space
30,528 S ft.
Percentage of Open Space
20%
Area of Impervious Coverage
119,348 S ft.
Percentage of Impervious Space
80%
Proposed Building Area
53,748 S ft.
% of building on site
35%
Number of Stories allowable
1 -2 1/2 Storie
Maximum Proposed Hel ht a.f.f.
25 ft.
Proposed Floor Area Bldg. 1
35,368 S ft.
Proposed Floor Area Bldg. 1 by use
12% Off ce
4,094 S ft.
88% Warehouse
31,274 S ft.
Proposed Floor Area Bldg. 2
18,380 S ft.
Pro osed Floor Area Bldg. 1 by use
25% Office
4,600 S ft.
75% Warehouse
13,780 S ft.
Required parking
74 spaces
Provided parking
Standard
76 spaces
HandIcap
6 spaces
Total
82 spaces
Required Loadina Spaces Bldn 1
4 spaces
Provided Loading Spaces
4 spaces
Re uired Loading Spares Bldg 2
3 s aces
Provided Loading Spa s
3 spaces
VARIANCE
REQUESTS:
The existing office building on the east side of the property to be removed is
approximately 6,000 square feet and used primarily for office with incidental
storage. Approximately 4,094 square feet (12%) of office space will be added to
building 1 and another 4,600 square feet (25%) of additional office space will be
added to building 2. The remaining building area will be used for warehousing.
1) Section 43.13.a.6 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding loading
docks;
2) Section 43.13.a.8 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding 4:1 ratio
setback for residential adjacency;
3) Section 42.4.e of the Zoning Ordinance regarding bufferyards;
4) Section 5 of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 regarding minimum
driveway separations;
5) Tree Preservation Ordinance regarding preservation of existing
tree coverage.
ACTION NEEDED: 1)
Conduct Public Hearing;
2)
Consider Site Plan Approval Request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
SPIN Meeting Report
(E)
Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 27, 2013
(F)
Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G)
Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(H)
Full Size Plans (for Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Matt Jones (817) 748-8269
Case No.
ZA13-001
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Memo Corporation
PROPERTY SITUATION: 722 S. Kimball Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block A, Entek Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: 1-1" Industrial District
HISTORY: A Final Plat (ZA86-059) was approved on December 16, 1986.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Meeting was held for this development on October 22, 2012.
The SPIN Meeting Report is provided under Attachment "D" of this
report.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Land Use Plan
Under the Southlake 2030 Consolidated Land Use Plan the subject
property is designated as Medium Density Residential. The proposed
development not consistent with the underlying land use, however the
proposed expansion is allowed under the existing 1-1 zoning district.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan indicate a planned on -
street bikeway and an existing 6' sidewalk along both S. Kimball Ave.
and Crooked Lane.
TREE PRESERVATION: The existing tree cover on the site is 6.6% and the applicant is required
to preserve 70% of that existing tree cover. The applicant is proposing
to preserve 57% of the existing tree cover. Based on the amount of tree
cover being preserved the applicant does not meet the Tree
Preservation Ordinance Tree Cover Preservation Requirements and a
variance is required.
P&Z COMMISSION: March 7, 2013; tabled (4-0) to the March 21, 2013 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
March 21, 2013; approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Revised Review
Summary No. 2, dated March 20, 2013 and Staff Report dated March
20, 2013, granting all variances; 1) Section 43.13.a.6 of the Zoning
Ordinance regarding loading docks, 2) Section 43.13.a.8 of the Zoning
Ordinance regarding 4:1 ratio setback for residential adjacency, 3)
Section 42.4.e of the Zoning Ordinance regarding bufferyards, 4)
Section 5 of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 regarding minimum
driveway separations, 5) Tree Preservation Ordinance regarding
preservation of existing tree coverage; and noting the applicant's
willingness to address the lights on the north side through replacement,
hooding, directional or sensors and the applicant's willingness to
examine additional possibilities to the northern fagade and the
applicant's willingness to replace the chain link fence with a wood board
Case No. Attachment A
ZA13-001 Page 1
on board fence on the western property line.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 27, 2013.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA13-001 Page 1
Vicinity Map
Memo Corporation
-LL-LL-L-L-L-j
Kimball Hill Ct.
a
E
Crooked Ln.
Case No.
ZA13-001
ZA13-001
Site Plan
722 S. Kimball Ave.
N
W E
0 200 400 800
s 1 Feet
Attachment B
Page 1
Plans and Support Information
�� Memo Corporation
722 South Kimball Avenue. Southlake, Texas 76092 USA �)) Tel 01 817 488 4444 1 Fax 01 817 488 0672 1 www.memoparts.com
City of Southlake
Department of Planning & Development
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
27 December 2012
Site Plan Application
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find attached a completed site plan application for the following proposed project:
Memo Corporation proposes a net addition of roughly 18,000 square feet of office/warehouse to its existing location at
the northeast corner of Crooked Lane and South Kimball Avenue, where Memo Corporation currently occupies
approximately 40,000 SF of office/warehouse situated on 3.85 acres commonly known as 722 South Kimball Avenue.
The net addition of 18,000 SF is a result of the demolition of the 4,500 SF building located directly on S. Kimball Ave and
the erection of a new 4,000 SF office building in its place in addition to an 18,500 SF building on the south side of the
property, with this building containing approximately 5,000 SF office and 13,500 SF warehouse.
This project is aimed to solve Memo's current space requirement while dramatically improving the overall appearance
and code compliance of the site.
Of particular importance is that the building to be demolished currently encroaches on the setback requirements off
Kimball Ave and the new building will be in compliance. Additionally, it is proposed that the new buildings be
constructed to current code standards and the existing warehouse be retrofitted with indoor fire sprinklers.
Additionally, the dumpster located on the front of Kimball will be moved to the back of the building and the loading
docks facing Kimball Avenue will be screened using a combination of trees and screen wall and reoriented towards
Crooked Lane. This will dramatically improve the current condition. It is further proposed that the two entrances from
Crooked Lane be closed and replaced by greenbelt. The entrance from Kimball Ave will be relocated and widened to
accommodate a larger turning radius and aim to eliminate large trucks stopping traffic on Kimball Avenue in order to
back in (as is the current condition).
A SPIN meeting has already been held and the project was received with positive feedback from several key neighbors,
including Carey Pearson, who resides directly across from the property on Kimball Avenue.
In order to accomplish this task, Memo will require two variances to be accepted.
1) Section 43 Overlay Zones III Residential Adjacency Standards 43.13 Development Regulations Paragraph a.(6)
This section requires that loading and service areas be located to the side or rear of the building.
The loading dock currently faces Kimball Avenue with no screen of any type. The project proposes to reorient
the dock to face Crooked Lane and be completely screened via a screen wall on the Kimball Avenue side and
large trees from the Crooked Lane side. Memo believes this is in favor of the neighbors at Miracle Pointe
;;MEMO
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-001 Page 1
Memo Corporation
722 South Kimball Avenue. Southlake, Texas 76092 USA
Tel 01 817 488 4444 1 Fax 01 817 488 0672 1 www.memoparts.com
because in order to comply with the ordinance, the loading docks would need to be located on the west side of
the property adjacent to Miracle Pointe. The proposed reorientation is both an improvement to the current
condition and a significant improvement to the alternative location which would be adjacent to Miracle Pointe
on the west side.
2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634; Section 5.0 Design Criteria; Table 5.1
This states that a minimum distance of 200' is required from the corner of a street to the centerline of a
driveway, and a minimum of 250' is required from centerline to centerline of driveways along the roadway (i.e.
Kimball Avenue).
Currently, the site violates this ordinance both on Kimball Avenue and on Crooked Lane. The proposal is to
eliminate all entrances from Crooked Lane, thus eliminating that violation and to have two entrances from
Kimball Avenue but satisfy one of the conditions, which is having 200' between the street corner and centerline
of the main entrance. The distance between the main entrance and the second driveway will be 234' as
opposed to 250' which is 16' shorter than the required distance. Again, this is a significant improvement to
existing conditions.
Please accept the attached application and accompanying $338.50 check for the application fees.
Thank you and I look forward to working with you on this project.
Best regar s,/
AmAElborai
Chief Financial Officer
Memo Corporation
;MEMO
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-001 Page 2
NH
O
,
NoldZo�9t16NV1Hll105 oAiA c,0m
L e� �v� "zu •'~4
s 10I NV1d 311S
'A li l
c w
OZ
Y
22 RES gpBe e� uuuu L
i �Ea �3 3
x'i na na °a °a °a'e
o \
U \
W \ Ern
\
PR §gg
\ a I
u \\ sos
m - \
o iI — _-
�Ue s\
�y ��
ailY
II a a$ e i ', cip II -g�
—4a} $i �'� gel day �$ i�i �ii d^ •,:� a I��I
EE
R H..
L -J L J
\ BBB a�e
I
I
I
�LJ
� al� \ � e � II � I � � I =� ►6
I I
§ I I
b A 3Ntll U3NOO8o I I
I o
I Jg
i I I 11¢
Case No. Attachment C
ZA13-001 Page 3
USOUTHLAKE
PROJECT NAME:
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION
SPIN MEETING REPORT
Memo Addition
SPIN # 8
October 22, 2012; 7:00 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3C — 3D
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Ten (10)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Patty Minder #8, Ron Evans # 10, Ray
Tremain #9, Vic Awtry #7
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Amr Elborai, Karl Dietz, and Tom Matthews (3)
• STAFF PRESENT: Caroline Eckel, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Caroline Eckel, Planner I: (817)748-8195 or ceckelo_ci.south lake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
• The property is located at 722 S. Kimball Avenue.
Development Details
• Variance proposed for the addition of 20,000 SF of office and warehouse space.
• Current zoning requires new driveways to be separated by a minimum of 250', and
loading docks to be located in the back.
• Proposed variance would request a separation of 234' between driveways, and loading
dock to be located on the front of the building, screened and separated from neighboring
residents.
The plan presented at SPIN:
I �
�► - r�Yeod.rl. a A
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-001 Page 1
QUESTIONS ! CONCERNS
• What will happen to the chain -link fence currently surrounding the property?
o The chain -link will go away and we will replace it with a new fence, likely to be
wrought iron.
• Stone/masonry columns, accenting the wrought iron, would dress up the fence around
the perimeter.
o Exact materials/designs have not yet been determined, but yes, we intend to
dress up the fence and make the property more attractive.
• Are there any restrictions on delivery times, since this is near a school?
o There are no restrictions on delivery times. They typically happen during
standard business hours.
• These are nice improvements. When do you intend to have your plans finalized?
o We have not submitted anything yet. It will be at least another 45 days. Our goal
might be to submit our plans to the city by February.
• The main entry for trucks is currently shown at a hard 90 degrees. This seems difficult
for trucks to maneuver. Can the entry be eased/widened?
o The drawings may appear a bit deceiving. The entry is actually quite wide and
the turning radius is 50'. The angle for the entry is best at 90 degrees to
accommodate the trucks turning in from both directions. But, as we finalize
designs we will ensure that 18-wheelers can pull in easily.
Your business has been a good neighbor. These improvements look nice and we
appreciate your business deciding to stay in Southlake as you expand.
As you make these improvements, will you install efficient sprinklers/irrigation to keep
water on the property, not running out into the street?
o We will adhere to all commercial landscape irrigation requirements. These
requirements should prevent us from wasting water.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-001 Page 2
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA13-001 Revised Review No.: Two
Project Name: Site Plan — Memo Corporation
APPLICANT:
Memo Corporation
722 S. Kimball Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-488-4444 x120
Fax: 817-488-0672
OWNER:
Same
Phone:
Fax:
Date of Review: 03/27/13
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 02/26/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT MATT JONES AT (817) 748-8269.
A Specific Use Permit must be submitted and approved for the proposed "Covered Parking".
This application can be run concurrently with the Site Plan. The applicant has submitted the
SUP Application and is being processed
2. Provide driveway spacing in accordance with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The driveway
spacing between the existing driveway along the north boundary and the new/relocated
driveway must be a minimum 250 feet between centerlines. A Variance has been requested
3. Loading spaces should be located at the side or rear of the building. A variance will be
required for the loading spaces front of the principal building. A Variance has been
requested
4. Label the adjacent properties to the west land use map designation ("L.U.D.=Medium Density
Residential")
5. The proposed addition does not comply with the 4:1 residential adjacency slope setback
extending from the residential property line of Miracle Point located to the west. A Variance
has been requested
6. The existing tree cover on the site is 6.6% and the applicant is required to preserve 70% of
that existing tree cover. The applicant is proposing to preserve 57% of the existing tree cover.
A Variance has been requested
7. Verify that the existing fence meets the following provision: Provide a minimum 8' masonry
wall (f2 type fence) meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Sections 39 and 42 along all
boundaries abutting residential property.
Informational Comments:
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 1
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and
will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a, a fully corrected
site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval
and all required fees must be paid.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Case No. ZA13-001 Review No. Three Dated: March 13, 2013 Number of Pages: 2
Project Name: Memo Corporation Expansion (Site Plan)
Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713
The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on February 18, 2013 . Comments designated with a
number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or
City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to
contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
The existing tree cover on the site is 6.6% and the applicant is required to preserve 70% of that
existing tree cover but is proposing to remove only two (2) existing trees. One of the trees is
within the proposed parking lot south of the Building 1 addition and the other tree is diseased
and a portion of its canopy died. Based on the removal of these two (2) trees the applicant is
proposing to preserve 57% of the existing tree cover. Based on the amount of tree cover being
preserved the applicant does not meet the Tree Preservation Ordinance Tree Cover Preservation
Requirements and will need to request a variance.
2. There are several trees that are shown to be preserved close to the proposed new construction
and the grading plan shows significant grade changes within the areas where the existing trees
are located. Please design the proposed grade changes to properly accommodate the existing
trees proposed to be preserved.
3. Show either all existing trees proposed to be preserved on the Grading Plan, or provide the
existing and proposed grading on the Tree Conservation Plan.
4. Darken the existing topography grades and label the proposed topography grade changes
around the parking lot in the northeast corner of the property.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
* New construction greater in size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,000 square
feet shall require compliance with the regulations of the Landscape Ordinance 544-B as it
applies to the entire square footage of the existing building and proposed addition, and to
Section 42 — Bufferyards, of the Zoning Ordinance.
Because of existing conditions within and along the north and west property lines and
bufferyards, the applicant cannot comply with the required bufferyard regulations unless these
items are removed. The North bufferyard is required to be a 10' — F 1, and the west bufferyard
is required to be a 10' — F2 bufferyard. The applicant will need to request a variance to the
bufferyard regulations because the full requirements for the north and west bufferyards cannot
be provided.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 3
SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERYARDS
Location/L Fence/Screening
enpth of Required / Bufferyard Canopy Accent
Base Line Provided Length Width/Type Trees Trees Shrubs Height &Material
North -
Required
344'
10' - F 1
10
21
28
Provided
344'
N/A
2
3
22
East -
Required
389'
10' — D
16
20
70
Provided
389'
10' - D
13`'
9B
79
South -
Required
355'
10' - D
14
18
64
Provided
317'
10,- C
8°
15
71
West -
Required
441'
10' — F2
18
35
53
Provided
441'
N/A
2
0
0
Note any Credits used in calculations:
A. Three (3) existing tree credits taken.
B. Eleven (11) existing tree credits taken.
C. Three (3) canopy tree credits taken.
Other Comments:
1.
2. Please match the required south bufferyard on the Site Plan with the required south bufferyard
on the Landscape Plan. The south bufferyard on the Site Plan is labeled a 10'-D and is 354.94'
long, and the Bufferyards Landscape Requirements Chart labels it a 10'- C and 317' long. The
correct bufferyard is a 10'-D and 354.94' long. Also correct the plant material quantities to
reflect a 10'-D, 354.94' bufferyard requirements.
The required plant material for a 354.94' 10-D bufferyard is as follows:
Canopy Trees = 14
Accent Trees = 18
Shrubs = 64
3. Label all bufferyards on the Landscape Plan.
4. The Landscape Plan is required to be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect.
QUALIFICATION TO PREPARE PLANS: For all lots greater than 30,000 square feet, Landscape
Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect.
4 Denotes required items.
* Denotes informational items.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 4
Public Works/Engineering Review
Case No. ZA13-001 Review No. 2 Dated: 311113 Number of Pages: 1
Project Name: Memo Corporation Expansion
Contact: Steve Anderson, Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 Fax: (817) 748-8077
Email: snderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 2/26/13 It is the applicant's
responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Detention pond calculations/functionality need to be for the 2-yr, 10-yr and
100-yr storms.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 3 copies of the civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed
Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public
Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction
plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer's Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be
approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure.
Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to
placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the
City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The
Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 5
Fire Department Review
Case No. ZA13-001 Review No. 2 Dated: 02-26-2013
Project Name: Memo Corporation
Number of Pages: 1
Contact: Kelly Clements, Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: 817-748-8233 Fax: 817-748-8181
The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on 02-26-2013. Comments designated with a number
may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City
Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to
contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (per
2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite
G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. Any addition to the existing structure will
require the installation of an automatic sprinkler system throughout the existing and new
structure.
A fire alarm system must be installed in accordance with NFPA 72 and the IFC 2009 edition
with the City of Southlake amendments. A weatherproof audible/visual device must be
installed above the FDC.
Backflow protection (Double Check Valve) for fire sprinkler system may be installed in the
building at the riser, instead of in an underground vault, if the riser is within 100 feet of the city
water main. The riser room must be a minimum of 6 feet by 6 feet.
Fire Department Connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a 30 degree
down elbow and a Knox locking cap. (Plans indicate two, 2 1/2" connections)
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the
building on a "hose lay" basis. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all weather surface, asphalt
or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (minimum of
80,000 pounds GVW). (Plans indicate 250 foot hose lay distance requirements are met,
which is acceptable for a fully sprinkled building)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants to have Hydra-Storz connections with butterfly vanes on pumper outlet for five -inch
diameter hose.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA13-001 Page 6
Surrounding Property Owners
Memo Corporation
SPO #
1
Owner
Reddy, Srilatha Etvir S Reddy
160
SF20A
Land Use
Medium Density Residential
Acreage
0.48
Response
NR
2
Elborai, Adel M
11
Medium Density Residential
3.41
NR
3
Thomas Family Partnership Lllp
SP2
Industrial
14.14
NR
4
St Johns Bapt Ch Grand Prairie
CS
Public/Semi-Public
12.89
NR
5
Donohue, Gerard S & Julia D
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
6
Mark, Robert Etux Carrie
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
7
Prokopeas, Chris
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.46
O
8
Akintade, Oluwafunmilayo 0
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
9
Kollar, George M
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.51
U
10
Fox, Todd Etux Kim
SF1-A
Low Density Residential
2.41
NR
11
Pearson, Carey Etux Kelly
SF1-A
Low Density Residential
2.08
F
12
Veranda Designer Homes Ltd
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.44
NR
13
Rae, Gary S Etux Patricia M
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
14
Miracle Pointe Development Lp
SP1
Medium Density Residential
0.91
F
15
Denis, Melisa Etvir Jean -Franc
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.71
F
16
710 Kimball Llc
01
Medium Density Residential
1.01
NR
17
710 Kimball Llc
01
Medium Density Residential
0.13
NR
18
Elborai, Adel M
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.67
NR
19
Elborai, Adel M
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
1.26
NR
20
Kimball Circle Estates Llc
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.84
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty (20)
Responses Received: Five (5) responses have been received, three (3) in favor, one (1)
opposed, and one (1) undecided
Case No. Attachment F
ZA13-001 Page 1
Property Owner Responses
Notification Response Form
ZA13-001
Meeting Date: March 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Prokopeas, Chris
2129 Kimball Hill Ct
Southlake Tx, 76092
22609 2 4
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to -') undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
eAvn oDAo�ec' fo +!.'V- VU-LJ bUdr2 ] �tr fx '&IJ ;-jCA5C%js
i 4S +1G �l,l C iH' C15 apf4L d wee'oryV "/t
c �l
FK
l��Lj�ciiv I cis}ir (,J �k�'lDusc - ��h two Ct y tn�s b c-;td� _ c�fCe�f�s f _r
lS i f �iMk }f 'i' fuv ;, VCCsl r evlt i 6b (y�Dt /n111 f f J C (i �2 SFf' '{VGswe
A
®® ,� ✓ �i�iC vtai Fh �lt'�`t1`G�r 4,> hide s'fkvcfucl
Signature: Date: i-23-20�3
Additional Signature:
Date:
Printed Name(s)-
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at t p. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-001 Page 1
_�z= -Y - -_ MOR52013�t�k�
605 as Kimball Ave
Southlake Tx, 76092
25470 3
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
Efavor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
r I ,
— A P- �— �al
')ignature:
Wditional Signature:
Date. -
Date:
Tinted Name(s):
ust be property nwmr(s) whose name(s) are pit ted at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
'hone Number (optional): t -�Ov
Case No.
ZA13-001
Attachment G
Page 2
Notification Response Form
ZA13-001
Meeting Date: March 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Kollar, George M
2137 Kimball Hill Ct
Southlake Tx, 76092
22609 2 6
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
1�
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
�`1 Q o C cry rcr�l5`� C�� o 11 cf Q a lsk:4 r, a-, SR Q,� �S? , 1",
1�A
o�d
�/22- v 0bum t-
Signature: R.
Additional Signature:
At Cs
Date: 3 Qi 3
Date:
Printed Name(s): �oOa—
Must be property owner(s) whose names) printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-001 Page 3
Mar 1913 08:09p The Donis 8174240114
Notification Response Form
ZA13-001
Meeting Date: March 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Denis, IMeliea Etvir Jean -Franc
2118 Miracle Point Or
Southiake Tx, 76092
26235F 2 5
p.1
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the ow s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
`�- (circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
S uef o r'T Loft"h 0 c
cl'Fmt�a� 41,
43
Signature: Date: 1 S 3
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Names): -'\ t ki k- rI T-S
r,1 ist he rr-rxi; ty owrWjs) whose naa*5) are printad at tap. 01hemiw cor*W ft ~4ng 06peftwt One fmm Per P►aP6dY-
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-001 Page 4
Mar 1913 08:09P The Denis 8174240114
Notification Response Form
ZA13-M
Meeting Dabs: March 7. 2013 at 6:30 PM
Miracle Poinbe Deveiopmarrt Lp
PO Banc 1353
Grapevine Tx, 76099
26235F 2 4
p.2
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
(in:favor of opposed to undecided about
(drde or underline orie)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Sovr() LoAot3L� Q60,'S T-i,�
o�-' P
KT-,-AA3A1-L-
� i8
Signature: Date: I
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s):
Must be property owner(s) whose name(&) are printed at bop. OftmAse conWd she Planning Department One forth per imPwtY•
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment G
ZA13-001 Page 5