Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1988-02-16
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 N. Carroll Ave. February 16, 1988 MINUTES Councilmembers Present - Mayor, Councilmembers: Charles Curry, Betty Wooll and Rick Stacy. Johnny H. Westerholm; Springer, David McMahan, Jim City Staff Present City Manager, Lloyd O. Latta, Jr.; Director of Public Works, Bill LeGrand; Police Chief, Jerry Crowder; Fire Chief, R.P. Steele; Accountant, Renee McCarty; City Engineer, Eddie Cheatham and City Attorneys, John F. Boyle and Toni Chamberlain. Invocation'~ David McMahan Mayor, Johnny H. Westerholm called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The minutes of the February 2, 1988 City Council Meeting approved as amended. Motion: Rick Stacy Second: Jim Wooll Ayes: Rick Stacy, Jim Wooll, David McMahan, Charles Curry and Betty Springer Nays: None Approved: 5-0 were Mayor's Report: Mayor, Westerholm noted Girls Scots of America. a Valentine the City received from the The Mayor received a letter from Roy English stating that Boys and Girls Basketball teams have been established. The players are chosen not only on ability to play ball but on scholastic achievement with representatives from different schools and different cities. Those selected from Carroll Schd~ls include: Laura Seemore, Dusty Kenvich and Richard Brown. The game will be played on March 19 at SMU, Moody Coliseum. A proclamation, proclaiming March as Youth Art Month, was read and approved. Motion: Charles Curry Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 2 Fire Chief R.P. Steele was recognized as receiving the honor of being appointed "Fire Chief of the Year" at the annual Tarrant County Firefighters Association Banquet held on February 14, 1988. Mayor Westerholm noted a success story of our Police Department. Several years ago, Kenneth Haley was riding his bike home from DFW one night and was the victim of a hit and run accident. His body laid in the weeds for approximately five months. Southlake Police solved the case this past week when an arrest was made for that crime. Thanks were given to the department. Agenda Item~ #4, City Secretary's Pre-termination Hearing The City Secretary, Sandra L. LeGrand was asked to step agenda item 84. down for Mayor Westerholm read a statement into the record. This is a hearing placed on the City Council agenda at the request of City Councilmembers for the purpose of considering the dismissal or retention of the City Secretary, Sandra L. LeGrand. Ms. LeGrand has the option of having this hearing in an executive session or in a public session. If the hearing is in an executive session, all parties will be excused from City Council Chambers and the hearing will be conducted in the presence of City Council, City Attorney, temporary City Secretary, City Manager, Mrs. LeGrand and her attorney, if she has one, and witnesses that she may call. All witnesses will be excluded except for the time they are testifying before the City Council. The procedures for the hearing will be conducted in the following manner: 1) Any member or members of their intentions and decision Secretary. City Council may state the basis for to consider the dismissal of the City 2) The City Secretary may then present her response and any witnesses she desires to present on her behalf. All testimony presented shall be direct testimony relative to the issue at hand. Any and all questions shall be directed to the Mayor. There shall be no cross examination of any witness by parties presenting evidence. The City Council may respond to questions and ask questions of any witnesses. All witnesses shall limit their remarks to a reasonable time period. City Council does reserve the right to impose a time limit on witnesses. The Mayor as the presiding officer and City Council as a governing body shall conduct the hearing and be in charge of all matters. All witnesses shall be sworn in prior to any testimony. Any decision of City Council shall be made in public. City Council may state its reasons for their decisions. City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 3 Mrs. LeGrand indicated she would like this to be an open hearing. .Mayor Westerholm asked that City Council make any statements at this time. In summary, the reasons given by Coun¢ilmembers include: lack of cohesiveness between managerial offices of Mayor, City Manager and City Secretary, the inability of the City Secretary to adjust to the responsibilities given her under the new City Charter, interfering with the office of City Manager, inability to get along with past City Administrator, Larry Munsie and interfering with other employees and family members Bill and Mike LeGrand. During Mrsl LeGrand's commehts to the Mayor and Council, she denied all of the accusations listed above stating, she was not aware of problems between the City Manager and herself and that City Council listened to only one side of the facts in gathering their information. She denied having problems adjusting but suggested that perhaps the City Manager was the one with the problems in adjusting to the City Charter. She expressed disappointment that City Council members would ~ake such action without even having talked to her about any of the stated problems. She stated she was never given a proper job description, nor had she ever had the opportunity to meet with City Council to work out every day matters. She asked for fairness. The following citizens spoke as witnesses in behalf of Mrs. LeGrand, all supporting the retention of Mrs. LeGrand as the City Secretary. For specific comments, refer to the February 16, 1988 tapes of the City Council Meeting. Witnesses include: Joe Bently, 214 Westwood Dennis Mender, 223 Eastwood Pam Muller, 214 Westwood Ann Barnes, 1350 E. Highland Kim Clancy, 1016 Alamo Mary Hawk, 1740 Sunshine '\ Tim Farmer, Rt. 1, Box 64 C Kathy Farmer, Rt. 1, Box 64A Bill Spivey, Rt. 1, Box 162 Aloha Payne, 1213 Whispering Lane Bill Hardwick, 660 N. Kimball Ave. Sonny James, 305 S. Kimball D.E. Roberts, 1214 Whispering Lane Doris Martin, Jellico Corners Joy Clark, 755 Randol Mill Eleanor Kasper, 750 N. White Chapel James Morgan, Rt. 1 Box 165 City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 4 Sally Hall, 1609 Mockingbird Jerry Farrier, 1336 Glen Cove A.C. Urbanosky, 2859 Raintree Bill Curb, 1640 W. Continental Robert Downard, Rt. 1, Roanoke Harold Knight, 1749 E. Highland Virginia Clow, 820 N. Shady Oaks Letters of support were read from Scott Dyer and Gary Fickes. Motion was made to go into executive session. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: Rick Stacy Ayes: Rick Stacy, Jim~Wo611 and David McMahan Nays: Betty Springer and Charles Curry Approved: 3-2 Councilmembers convened in closed session, under V.T.A.S. Article 6252-17. Upon return, Motioh was made to Secretary. Motion: Charles Curry Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan Nays: None Approved: 5-0 retain Mrs. LeGrand as City Rick Stacy, Jim Wooll and Item #8, Resolution 88-15 Resolution 88-15, calling two public hearings for annexation of property known as 31-D. The petition requesting the annexation of the property was presented to the City Council on January 19, 1988. After discussion, Motion 88-15 with the first public h~aring being held on March 7:30 p.m. and the second public hearing to be held on March 7:30 p.m. at a special City Council meeting. Motion: Rick Stacy Second: Jim Wooll Ayes: Rick Stacy, Jim Wooll, Charles Curry, David McMahan and Betty Springer Nays: None Approved: 5-0 was made and approval given to Resolution 1 at 8 at City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 5 Item ~10, Ordinance #415~ Masonry Requirements Ordinance #415, 2nd reading on Masonry Requirements, was discussed. A suggestion was made that a work session be held on the issue. Public Hearing: Joe Bentley, Woodland Heights He appreciates problems being addressed by this ordinance. He feels 1,000 feet is an appropriate distance from residences, for metal buildings. Also, that the metal buildings be restricted to I-2 zoning. Dennis Men~er, Woodland Heights - He agrees that 1,000 feet is a good rule from residential areas. They are in favor of the old masonry ordinance. Ann Barnes, Highland - She is against the proposed change to the masonry ordinance. She wants only 100% masonry except in industrial areas. She presented petitions. Kim Clancy, Mission Hills - She is against this ordinance. Aloha Payne, Whispering - We need to protect our schools. not want metal buildings around residences or schools. She does Barbara Dofelmier, Cross Timber Hills - Presented a petition regarding the subject. Her addition is now having problems with metal buildings on the western boundary due to the annexation. Sonny James, Kimball - We must protect the residential areas D.E. Roberts - Protect the residential areas. Lawrence Kossoh - sent letter opposing change to masonry ordinance. Public hearing was closed. Motion was made to table the ordinance until the next City Council Meeting, March 1. '\ Motion: Jim Wooll Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Jim Wooll, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Charles Curry and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved (to table): 5-0 Item #9~ Enforcin9 City Ordinances A discussion was held concerning the establishment of a enforcement of city ordinances in newly annexed areas. policy on City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 6 Mayor Westerholm explained the reason for needing to establish a policy on enforcement. Public Works Director, Bill LeGrand explained several problems that exist because of situations that were in effect in the newly annexed areas. Portable signs are a big problem, businesses next to residences, junk cars before land was annexed in the city are just a few examples. Tim Farmer, next to Strand Excavating - stated that noise is a big problem for them. They have been in the city for 22 years. Strand was annexed into the city in October 1987. They feel Strand should now comply to city ordinances. John Boyle, City Attorney, stated any citizen can file a complaint if they have a problem. Tim Farmer questioned why they had to file a complaint when a Southlake police officer was there and heard the noise. Kathy Farmer was present and expressed concern over the way the Police Chief has handled the problem. Councilmembers asked that the city staff come up with a recommendation and present to Council for a possible solution. Item #7, Resolution 88-14, Street Priority List Resolution 88-14, establishing a priority list improvements for Tarrant County, was considered. for street Motion was made to approve Resolution 88-14 subject to Highland being the first priority. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: David McMahan Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 Item ~5~ Resolution 88-12, Park Bgard Appointments Resolution 88-12, park board appointments, was discussed. Motion was made to renew the terms of Goldstein, Stacy and Roberts for three year terms and fill the two vacancies at a later date. Motion: Betty Springer Second: Jim Wooll Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 7 Item $6~ Resolution 88-13, Amendment to Election Resolution Resolution 88-13, amendment to election resolution relating to the establishment of city precincts, was discussed. Motion was made and approval given to Resolution 88-13. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: Rick Stacy Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 Item $11~ Ordinance $416, Principal Uses Ordinance $416, principal uses in less categories, was discussed in 1st. reading. restrictive zoning Motion was made and approval given to table Ordinance $416. Motion: Rick Stacy Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved (to table): 5-0 Item $12, Ordinance $334-27~ Special Use Permit Ordinance $334-27, Special Use Permit for an equestrian center, was discussed. The property is a tract of land located on S. White Chapel Rd. Motion was made to approve Ordinance 15 year special exception use permit. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: David McMahan Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, Rick Stacy '\ Nays: None Approved: 5-0 #334-27 in 1st reading for a David McMahan, Jim Wooll and Item $13, Ordinance $334-28~ Zoning Request Ordinance $334-28 (ZA87-50), zoning request for I-1 tract of land and I-2 for a 4.742 acre tract of Lippincott. 2nd reading. There were no public hearing comments for the 2nd. reading. for a 4.7 acre land. Owners, City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 8 Motion was made and approval given for Ordinance Motion: Rick Stacy Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Rick Stacy, Betty Springer, Charles Curry, Jim Wooll Nays: None Approved: 5-0 #334-28. David McMahan and Item #14~ Ordinance #412~ SP1 and SP2 Site Plan Districts Ordinance #412, 2nd reading, for S-P-1 and S-P-2 Site Plan Districts, was discussed. Mr. Boyle outlined the corrections to be made in prohibiting the use of S-P-1 and S-P-2 for residential uses. No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance #412 as corrected by the City Attorney. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: David McMahan Ayes: Jim Wooll, David McMahan, Charles Curry, Betty Springer and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 Item #15, Ordinance #414, Hotel/Motel Districts Ordinance #414, 2nd reading Hotel/Motel Districts, was discussed. There were no comments during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance #414. Motion: David McMahan Second: Charles Curry Ayes: David McMahan, Charles Curry, Jim Wooll, Betty Springer and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 '~ Item #16, Ordinance #417~ Limited Time on Sale of Seasonal Items Ordinance #417, 2nd reading adding new section 5.18 pertaining to temporary limited time permits for the sale of seasonal items, was discussed. There were no comments during the public hearing. City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 9 Motion was made to approve Ordinance #417. Motion: David McMahan Second: Jim Wooll Ayes: David McMahan, Jim Wooll, Charles Curry, Betty Springer and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 Item #17~ Ordinance #419~ Sale of Seasonal Items Ordinance #419, 2nd reading regarding sale of property not zoned for such sales, was discussed. seasonal items on There were no comments during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance #419, 2nd reading. Motion: Jim'Wooll Second: David McMahan Ayes: Jim Wooll, David McMahan, Betty Springer, Charles Curry and Rick Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 Item #18~ Financial Report and Item #20~ Department Reports Motion was made to table Items #18 and 20 until a future meeting. Motion: David McMahan Second: Jim Wooll Ayes: David McMahan, Jim Wooll, Rick Stacy, Betty Springer and Charles Curry Nays: None Approved (to table): 5-0 Item #19, Resolution 88-19~ Budget Amendment IV Resolution 88-19, Fiscal Year 1988 budget amendment IV, funding contract with Lochwood, Andrews a~d Newnam Inc., was discussed. Motion was made to approve Resolution 88-19. Motion: Jim Wooll Second: David McMahan Ayes: Rick Stacy, Jim Wooll, David McMahan, Betty Springer and Charles Curry Nays: None Approved: 5-0 City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 10 Public Forum. Robert Downard - remarked that if he ever has anything to approve he would like it done after midnight. Doris Downard - believes that what happened at the meeting tonight shows the people that City Council does listen to the people. Other Actions Motion was made to cancel the February 19, Special City Council meeting. Motion: C~arles Curry Second: Betty Springer Ayes: Charles Curry, Betty Springer, Rick Stacy and Jim Wooll Nays: David McMahan Approved: 4-1 The meeting was adjo%~rned by Mayor Wes~ ~ C~ ty o~ Southlake V 5/1- $SIGN UP IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK DURING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHTNMI 1,_4dr(LCAWf 4, 1 7-en - e / CITY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE AGENDA ITEM (Please Print) USE 7M1/771//c4 77` -7e he �a/W7 744/ ?g //o//- /.. / 1 o 0,s o v-// /�f .1/di .76e _ 3/ Y(/ a atiut '7,sS- _,__e z)-e_ez& (/ ( / -7czo � �z_,.�) tfi-76. c.61_,A4,4v g/- 0-0 7 7 --4g/ ,. eA,,,_ -�aJ.�W �,t ,4 1 ,, b,_..._, ,,,e,_ _,,/-2 Z.G / , ,,/ v _ JA___,a•-?-)-„e) . AL ) 4-e(t b(r--C_ /eLLe., i I cY 4 tii -(44-?,--1/(,4_,/ #, .:c6,72,,p,-_,.) , a....1-__e„--z..._ tivi) , autip,, kkta 4—,--)—) • 1: At-AA..(z� ay , V f; JoX /6, I I l S-P 1 Ue`l ktA-wake TY 749 h 7 L/,3,- 9S,2Jd ,/ 1 ,C7X/6s' 7 1,3-/V/ , -. 67/2-7 /1,A/ c. ,---),,,,„,,,, 7,7" N-2,- --z_ _ 3 7P-6/ 0 - 4- -- 5 1-CLy H LL Ao0 i /,,1oc_1rN Ge Hap fir- s3 (1. # 1/ a(4--eLiC-:_--726,, ,,,„ w 1 LO, : - Lv, u...„r7\ . 1- ,S ( -i ( - L( ---t':c-f- ,/ ‘,-/),,,d;/)cj /336' •Ge,Y,) 6ieo •ir/)--7,7x /,,/ ,/ Q ) 1..Q�� 9,c1)5--27,0 v Yq.eJ VZ , ql- o\L- UMW A _ ME - SIGN UP IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK DURING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHT l /4 - /7P8 / CITY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE AGENDA ITEM USE (Please Print) ifiliC/-& - (F, -// ,-k-,c, or / / 7 , . 4 1/ \ /42/A4-frt-e--%- . ,it'4( . r/ 1177figlin //pi4iPr .r' -( // /,/,(,ig, _,_,LrAJ (;,(.:,s,.., - , . 51,-_,-1.,41,i,oe- i.a.,7 • t Jf5 i.. f�l,'Y 4t. ' G - ittki }' 1111 pi,a�li�? ' a; !I:i ., q a I'`i. r LI , :II a 4� •. ,''t �t 1 "s Y,! r ' '•t' }"; '1. j f-N .!1A q' as ;` 'I, r p4'4j.'iq; F.,j its, !�� •'• r: 'i= s,,. '�r' �a%+ `";€ 1)' 1 ,�,ii, ' .a'— if�/ti •.ln..�.Y' 4'',.' 4 sty .y� ..,r .t.,. 3 f' f£' it R'''" .4 Ni, §;7 ¢ City ty of ' P .`ems 1 ' �4u. FT ,y1l��� e . childhood is the time to develop nteres s, skil s n a to es that will last a lifetime, and WHEREAS,- through meaningful art activities children develop initiative, self-expression, creative ability, self-evalua- tion, dicipline and a heightened appreciation of the environment, and, WHEREAS, the importance of art in education and recreation is widely recognized, ' NOW THEREFORE, I, JOHNNY H. WESTERHOLM, MAYOR of the City of Southlake, do hereby proclaim March, 1988 as YOUTH ART MONTH and urge all citizens to become interested in, support and ' encourage art programs presented in schools and youth organizations. n r 'PRR r D`. S_S HE/16 H' D f1F EBRUARY, 1988. li . -4?k ,.... ' -.., ,' /1, / , /1./7/47(2,/ Ma or, City of Sou'thlake ,> =.�',•-. ;'s. City Secretary \ : 1 `. ' February 15, 1988 Mayor John Westerholm Southlake City Hall 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX. 76092 Dear Mr. Westerholm: Almost two years ago, my family and I moved to the -city df Southlake. We did so because we loved the open spaces, the educational system, and the home we selected. We knew and accepted the pending problems with the airport. However, we were not ready to accept the problems that our own city council was causing because of the lack of guidelines regarding zoning in our city. Therefore, I would urge each of you to begin a careful study and adoption of a Master Plan, upon which all future zoning would adhere to. It is not fair that some zoning has been decided solely for the gains of a few individuals. The rights and lifestyle of all of the citizens of Southlake must take precident over these few. It is also important that all hearings must be brought to the attention of all citizens, well in advance of the dates of such hearings. The issues, including land tracts, should be spelled out in a language that everyone can understand. There must be no secrecy in these matters! It is because of the above issue that I am writing. Unfortunately, I will be out of town on the night of Feb. 16, and cannot make your meeting to discuss Ordinance #415. I am deeply opposed to this ordinance, as are all of my neighbors. I do not want any metal buildings anywhere near our home. I will help in any fight to prevent metal buildings near our residential areas all over Southlake. Hence, I support the proposal stating that any building, regardless of zoning or use, if located within 1000 ft. of a residential neighborhood, must be constructed of acceptable masonry material. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Laurence J. Kossak 1203 Ashmoore Ct. Southlake, TX. 76092 0 I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods . Since the large majority of our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake . Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction . Signature Printed Name Street Address ( `71 a . "; micfmEt 4, S%/MEAT i ziz r)0H155 ;AJ Di>uc lic_4---y ./tri _ Aiiie 4 z, ( le,b7, 7)-/-- 4742? __ad fj,e,i,t7 z/m/& wvfri € D i G/f E-. ltio/07-ri 0.4 f/ L-1/-1,crt l'-'- L ' 4,,, , -w,D,A\,.. , /1_ _R k-ADIFtext4,1 IAA .- Co0Ge_ri) i/ AQ/iJ O 1 /�o1/ wi-// /a,6- , f� & , e l tni II an tne- 'Rob(nSOy) 1 14-O4- (h (VercU11L , ... knno-- 0-4 SummR,11;r- j - 11lh'\� cin0� \ i / I ► .e1 R_R1 1)io [INso-1.; ) -I o Q) co/-((.SPe--11.1tiCD -LL tiv/x DR,e�/,i/ I , $c,�7cit f / / riebi„ .V/E�� I V),dh``�� - -43,0 t � Scr2A re,Nile e 6 1410 (,t)W ISP rezA1U JU6L L �17�m,Q c, 1 tit ( N o v\ FP_cw(TT NO 5 I O b'\3 n -ID e.k I •���n V" orv_vt -WEw t-lk t LI 0 S Va‘NtSFE.QAN`S 1bELl, ka Noknc, we- v2-.13 %his `L 1`1--3.-1-.. . I a 111 0 I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods . Since the large majority of our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake . Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction . Signature Printed Name Street Address 41 hp. f A-rTo lac- q UTF 4c4C1A-- A .4 04 � \6V e rL 1 ( i e o2'15h Vo,",, RQ� £ od ///«t 4S7-4 E- So r/7 4,1.44 y1� ien►s Srzr C ,4 5Ihrr zg zee c+s re-1 S ovrd#'.)•, 1 I 6 S • I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature,— Printed Nam Street Address ,ter 1 1` I � W t G`�,l.L� IV 1 r1 i I L .'L ( +' C 1c f 4 , � La c1-Lc-l ' / L rittkibiEy 0 •OADotte 9121 J M _ _ ..=::: '14. , �e t _-„," /O. �%' A' /i . ' I r / 71/ kUU//(/ ! /0;0" %/S /J/' r` � t� ire--.oak/ - a Dr , d :vaA- pA),tt p+ -f -al'Z ./0 17 /l/<s:/ ..; b r I • ( liti-c9„ct ) ii;rivieth /l'Nn T- /017 Missi oi? !fir. J. 6-:\) , ., , \\c, N..,2_,,,_ I '- 6;-,-1 '//,. 9 GUv �f c :. /-✓( e del I iv(Fi (el v.? f/,4,--m C,,,,c P/,� r) I %L1_,I, CIr ' 1J R44 Lz_____i 77P� 7/ � L,l ry --r i�iL C ' > �`�M° �/ L J 73(v �i 0_rnonr-i I vri /h' 3 DI ilL/e :vD T f vet/ I (� - �' 7 C/ X%2t S / / i,eif/f/V / )3 v 27/N,tl c //,,/,/ ,%c. - iiND(-1 )ile.0 E= (- 10 3y )6111 _8 v( ni a_ 1_ I %V,,.) V/9- /4 ,f1)A (2 j TU i 0 S Z Dirq")')i) /JD !3/(,, �' ..(-�U�' Cs l /. / � 1 �l P .�1.1v -S D 1 R E ry OU I u 3 c; j � rn o N� 3 t V D . /1A..--X._ v--h�-1/-r_� J I Y7'111_S R1 1-J/_!V cL)0 R I U 3C' DlL} In:JNl7 it- V D , I Jiti4,-1; 6 ' 1 IV> /11/A(40)(- / facVS /00V S/P/PGAidl ,61-/ 11/ 1(,, ''''v`.) 7 0 &)i. 6(‘4^jt44K-Zr. 1, eD Lk LIK1/7)04)Z / // T „e ,� , „. ! ,ti D /Cfi�cl / / gLrk111 i () � l7/G��r�ii ao - /-/o%t. /4'S7-c 22` /D - CJ i 'e:::.iyt,"�,,,.:C F. 1/Zvi • I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating. types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. ' Since the large ' . majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there , is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built . within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable. masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address , / -___ ii6 , 4 //'you "7 Lr] 4-- r /iyC:c7\, 7 /0/j Ale'2,16v - (.. -‘4,(... ,(--_,/ - r___ F5) Yi c E� / o /7 4 1---4 rV, 6 -'. f i-i- ,. ''„ .: _ F. FosrE7c-- VC-4nlan! _:.: :,! C-i C:: Ic ��u . Gr=,L,k_AG-�EtZ 5c.:3 �'�L,, C,T. -� -- ) . 1 -'r1/nn ` l_.'-G yVl•r\ rl-•'/',i1,,r � L. Z`.,!'C;� / ; ' 7 '�;1 /,,L ,�/'. Ql ��, f<I-'r 14, / )E A.` , /) . JIG- , i_;yi1 C.) v �� _3i11�5 Hi •17L. i it 1\;5 1 3 ALilit I c Die, . 7 , � . . Viz& VA, Ls la k.15 A-L.,Ain.ko '1;2 1 0 71/u--e_-0 -. VG4--- 41 aggl,E 0 1 1.)5 1016 Q caL-42D . Ir� G:'-12-iii�•i r' •, L _n ! y�1<�if) i l! j1 'f' Y�/ ci. `� 6 l' l_ /: i eil L( 0,— ��'' :�n�i�Lii'" -J }M. / 1 / �' /(c :'f'r i(.6 1),Ilr„Jr, A i-. ( 1, r "'3(,. its )/ ./'' i 'lam "Z• 1C•/4 e.I/ .; //. 6/ F/' /O,`:- tila.,,fz,:-/ /1,0-5m 1 J - `( ;-61.( /k-.-! (•►-60(T,6r l� a t`0/6/ /1 /(,c.(`✓()w(e' I' / ! ,y P.e /5„7e.,,,,,x),,/ � /1 I - rJ/ /} / (7,.) - / \^/�'-.�� Lei ri,J .,� /%'..//l/c �/ !0/ / ,4,!..../ ;,,,i.n� 1 v., f Ge-pa-, \-(A, LA,Lys —,-os--___Cck.—. .\,Lc.,,_ \ . �r - _2- 71-1 v v'V'tr15 Or1°C P(� i C )-'-I- 01-0 VV►U U .or, IP 2't /1��z . ;ECG 1 0 y "BC-IN ithL K 5.11 r rna et . • I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in- Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built I within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address I , 1,, .�Gi�,,_.� o u ti 5-f it IUk-(Gt+: . to L7 D i&uA c kci, B I✓d- I j c.�, ,. aV'�e titi— I O S I v1/4 0‘.A.d 131 uct j 1-7317."26, ,--- �%, ii ,�/ " i ( ' C ; � I I G 3 Q Di g r� i) eft/ � �I 1--/.6' cfric__ -D e i 77-7--1 /1):..3g ---D i q 07 n ci -?Id ('-:—77- . 411 ,4,77474.X /" 1/1 �''l'I")'1 L 4'v,II,,,, p. ; 1J�-L,O9 iZ Eri,,,,, &LIQ, ‘ ,, ,)--1 i-K.,...a.)/1 Toil G i i w k iri '/? /3 Lvci.. .2-1-ric/ A,-49, ,1 Li % (� �, 4 0lu — r, ��A , � 1 ie Ftr-r (LI 61 v1 (C I (rk tAek =L(Yi L`7t )C c k-e-- . 1 ty-, _ L.R 331.____-, -a, A('`.2y � cLl,.i�iz , Inlh DiAMQ4cLava_ . ?h,(/' (.,.(----\de ,ti.-y- ._,it1(.-"-- / ;: U�r 12, 2t r el id/ i1 7'2 O 0 0+ur241� Cidek--,&- 30 Aim riCICICk tl c /c �'1 aea,/,,,,ia-,(73C-err2-.. I 218 Eastwood Drive - Southee, Tx. 76092 FebQruiry 8, .'1988 City of. Southlil ►ke Committee Southlake, Tx- '•76092 • Dear Committee Members: I I would like to:add 'my agreement to-the proposal presented. by- Pam Bentleys I would be most as a Southlake homeowners •of your support in keeping the residential/commercial area transitions as harmonious aka possible.' The clause requiring all masonry construction on commercial buildings within 1000. feet of re® sendial areas would help to achieve that end® Many thanks for your consideration. I Sincerely, Dee Loveless • % D/7,71 72/&5 /d'- 410 I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance I regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large I majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address "4// 3771 6-1/ - j/(at_' / 9.: 64/ 4d ie., ,(: , . , el- AZ7 ,msnvoed. a I _ - ,(.),-' E i AJL\L "13 &— i 0 /ke.e_7. —97 Lc- , L,- 7./z/-- 57/-37/,3•1- /Aec\ritj15 q /bf_,57,z-zo-)16-:,, )-271;zz' 4, Z)6?577es 49--/w5f_ic X4---th-s , f)9/(J ,i7,-4)61i:) ,-, c-�. /i7 G�� Gce_ M.`-Nt. / .11a_ (We,Sfwo o Lr, r`& Dc --r'e,�\ \\AAu / 6/__c/,io�,c, pi,,. I / I ,-- L d / I I ' /0 it.-/«-7-.\01163Ji,v --)On Kir- ria I(e-s-A I I I i i 1 e_vey c ,e',v C_/ 7 S'd Piq) 7�E,j /6 A O' I II am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties I must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection I homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable Imasonry construction. Sig Ature Printed Name Street Address WPC--reZe-:- M i c i r4 eE V2 _�ul/i u;i-,- c71 l FAa-{-wa.,-1 ,02. S o ii,I c�,r l I e_ lvi. Su vAm . P- , - j, 4.,,...„/ .- -t.- )040es S 776 0 t 4i ss '8 /..,%siA✓oe,) 0,e S'0,4 oxi` IRi:4,-)9 q _ ^-, cR, c_i 4.n(zsN 4 ✓i 4€s s a f g 45% o,)* Jou?Jz,,freL 6, , e, 6, 0,01kk ` OR..Pls al � r I .i-, -- ig 610 (1) • VO R R I S e9--i e6o1,51,41_1,.."_., c `,/a I , . �,, r- DEG ,,.,Li. efi`Z2 1_ J, 8,0/7,VS"9c' a/7 &w/ s a, �_/,,,, , ,A-1,4 Er__ 6-7 ,zi,5 1--(/4430Z- 2-.) -6-457-arrrb b.A— ge___ (- -- c(—k P /17t--5( z1"1 ( J C-“U-) 0 �_A /_���.,1 L,f\, iq : 1 (u__ir, 4,, i.v, ;�, 4n core C , \ 1 , ��c, J..,, ine e 1Cw A oo7P,r; 21 Wc_,W o-t'i) I I I -0 1, \.\ I ■ I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address vu nod_ (2.f_}_--( U-7)k (.\ vvvp ol Og_41-W000t • n-uby 1 31f7M (cca aa � '�/ CPP0 Ti 4 e I J.,e. -: /6 /9 j, �,"�( e/r c'cr)U;� • 2 ;' TE S iG i=� '. /.Jd I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. . Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address !A%-(Mic,y, Q z4t,, IA),i_i_miy, ., -,ioo, -1,36o )\*KE-visto biz ./L71 .--247)-2-7A0.— 7)).7..,k, 6._ez),,,_44-p-t__ /S 412 . bq -kJ&(114',s • IQ Z 4;,r4-1--, e Gcirlli,/sue, /39, 'A1/ 7h1eage MIA. Gv . 4,4y 033 4 'eJ 41&iV 1)1 ;i /376, Lu,k al, ';is .R k12i , 11v1�1 ) �' t°�r 4 I IL �`'� (/'ci t1/1 �:.Cq . jf "4iEcc' 'I`Jbu0C.1 Q.ao6 SAA'DOLOWC. C. sue- aAtA o O O r6 (LT S10-SSW - .1 icY'J'vsell/ 7 84x I , a�r� �,�' CaA.e0r� �3 Y8 ens �� ,., ‹,.‘--( i'' . -" 4/v--6---- / ) chlo.--0 keEiv ,) /f/e4-- 4 27v , i gC9b V2, 6-• PI .4 WOG 13;i/i e F. D tic iz6 c i/ G7vV' z 4-471A 1-4 672 /33L ac 3 ee i (( 27,Leo-z--.,z 0./(,__7:57r-, ic,,,,a,-i./-- 7-7./se,-- A336 C-7,4) ave. sh a' 4J,r u-o ,flo) FeA-Le j J,b //1)() Cher tC ' Naif 1',',N vvi i e IN vv 0 . FE/Wo'o 1160 Nate,( neLVT jl 'W-0, N1W-s) G5t wcoDfoito-ci LA-3 "76a cr- i,t/-` Pcw,1t`'7r-66 1 --- J ` g3 K 0 cr 4v0A, DP I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance • regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable. masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address "'///6r/)4 c7) t'G , �60 `7 4- 0 v r )''s/c� 7 /0/J IVezi060 - J.-J 0- ,t-., LI.; .rr-.__ F. Fos-ye - lifC-,e/fadNi _ c: u-11i,-,,,,, l..i- 6 i 1 .941k _ Cfa I J I LL,p,C N 5 C, 5 ( r-rc ti� C T. 17):1„: •,fi:7 , '',Et I-1 Z L.C_C.il- :3 C:L/C/ . /Q:2 i`f r/1,0 .19!", *141. l/ " )--°C ".. ,''i- its�,4 /7)L L ciL /G i2 7 iik4a I. .2/'. ri I ` ),, ,�y,-.:-.))Au ;� _ �I77 r-I k W ,t,'yel 0 3 /ac,l 4/O be_ 7 t,� c/r��/ , / li s iii,), P VJ /• 3 At c I /r ' _ ,3. 1Lizt& ��(.,sS 101,, /4-4,u0 - . bvz v(5_1/1(vt—L_ieV(-: (4 agg-te eV,1 iQsa-__2__ 10 I a AL-&-40-7• `J c1:._)e vi ill S - e C n-iu Le /6 /6- it"( / -rite 4-tei 1/L ice: . /--' ,) 1 llv�✓I, ),/,,/ ! .: , `2-,; ! J el Ki c_\/ (/ 11 0 .6 b r P(C47- /L.5 W Cl't=c :S f el`f'_ ! J ^. ,,, . ih.�E � f 41J /�Nn1(/h rei.0 / S / t�,- S% (, )�- `�' /)'( I� ; )/ i� (,-- ')1.� ii)/C. �e// 14 , ic:r. 1`6r /9/c. `-'' �-0-)m 7 7 /2/,✓ L5 (7 7)-2 nJ A a c '- rz/r mil. c(;r 2 4240 it-,t; 1D 4 (—I al-eftklAi---__)-ezil-a.)a,69,v, ( cosoiti A 16 r o),:i.--/e r ic:,2/ff ,e(-4.gwood ,,, - ,\1�,k . --�'. .._/��1 ct C t—, Phi 1 ���ia.I (iti I2S .SAS— !Li ' l c, -D C, - iii _D_/ti43 .1.(.i.614 .2-e,41% ,.. • I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance III regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Nam Street Address L,Lu Y ru i- c i i cc( r c. , f v led-Cr Q/6' / o,J �L l , .Y (,� mite 9/7a • __._ __I___ . / %'` r:. - /-z,/,�;�/6 1 OA/ 'd (._. ) qp7 atm/ /9 /0 ..__c 4//5 5/c)/1 rt?ftti A y i syy7 i • ' 1 cV,C41, .. NI/Yore__ 0/0a&lArla--1"no Dr- �lR ti ,;".dam_ PZAUA,9,41, /J +MZ.. 1 a 17 list's,, lb), ZC ) /7wi4h_ i`c�?T- /617 MSinn r� ' \ L-1 - - iy. Cj R l vol X-dviatA,eyel e w ;�( ki, f 7e 644 e% (6 ,1z O'i 44 r7,a l fv I >n l ckri . P USA-i'U --FT Cy E )03 Co T I arnoncI RI�/d. --7 �� ���ll��, (� �� /b 3 A p//`o/I/I6:V1) T/V �r �� c/,iiu s /�7 /"'; /G /03 f D 1// 0,,-//1/��/ (' i� ✓ ) 64. 5 ii Nn )" j, 7 ) �12Prey lo3v itaoNn �l�dl.. -,%,,„_) 1/.r9=,_- 3-7,9 nl 3 u.i T o") i a. Z Di/L1(Y)(-) AJD 13L6 (Cu&C-1.A (....l <'.( 0cti-1,tA) -SHN43i RIbENOUR / o30 1, jnc- b \,b 3LVb. 697-7-7-9-, K--/,--*(04-1,-.1.-N 'J ���►£S RI �1EAUOH �2 l03v 1�i<} �-,own �� vi) , 111174 61}L jeAC I 1 L�;kW$ /0 ' /0 ,o / Ad. ro,,,-Q7 o -)t.y,„62)/g.-- p,A0L___ ,:sc..w_ 1(ci,c. ), e,c3L-L_Dor-,?odo A--<e.,,,, /a 11 cL / - Qerki v. 1 /r) ? D/c?, 4.:-1/ z. ; . c E /o z z J /cr.-]7 G, V 4-e-1- X I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address )661 1,,,iic,,i_ Dour S$v-(c-k(� to a D(CL u.t o wcL 131 t/� �, r , c�c, ,a_�5e LA._,_ , b a_j Diu,,,-)„o 31 ocl ,..)__ / u a ;------ 1,-/-4-, i 0 2,j— j),,,-4-7,1,0,-,0 /5,..,/ii ri-A,e7,- / _e ,*,,,--i,-, -7,p (-rare: .0eCi 11-1-; / 63V Di.q\„), r) of Wiii zz--4, , ,(' 6 1 e,- ( - e7 ( 1----, d ' , / .e rie:TheC ikril /c5g ---P/q ir), fryc / ,r, _ i r 4-Y1LgvviioACk. / /\JLo ) ?ZL E1eRAI &V/,0, /s 1'AA 4-; 9-1 /leJsovL, '--t 0-. e 4 ( .8/u „A91" _me, 11) (2--,4 .,,,j Ti 14-( G h ,,,v ell. ,,?,2 &,,,t. --i-dc-90/./;,9, G�;,J1Lrrf) 5 // &-��/al I ) k.^(., y},„ , �t,�r i„L., 1 Ai Qnr,9, hk„I ii q i0 For.- r-a1 ® 61 d b _____4 ,---) 13 1:---i-1 N(DA.41 0 ut.eie_ (0 1 (LCAOcarritka, >Re j uu }k-l-kA 1,---- A PL2 -h L-LLe.izJ in I h fp,A Mbocl.8 L icL fri6-1_,-. } /' -f, t zBI/72/ / /NNy /0-v,,' iiff.A GN, . G w (R\si ' ,,, Vent,.. g i0� i 020 0 is in.Aol44 PVuii jd`-• /6, / q a &ry eorr;c'v I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods. Since the large majority or our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address "el) eve f� , e / a-,-4€S /5 5 0 E. A ^ i s/, a' 2 k. Autti7arAtei a u d 4 ii t ,4..t�.. 6111,21:41 0;� i h i G. ( si /jr7 /a o it 1 La 11 yllt--ede--egy,friri San 06 - -(461z3raf{-K! /4-4 3_ IrAA_ (A.A__k__- Lt2 CA-�--- ,I14'(2 2 Li )04/es o is 1 9.0 Z j ci ,- 'L i i. ,r � �� QAS 12�eYYy toa 1�1f(L� L.� 0 j J 1_, w„.442., , L9 4 Id 0�G QAdo (2zto I�SN���bikt, . i � P1,161,p T Pao1/4 o I Zc.,40 45/1 10oRE c r. r i ram= j76,4 L fichzAl ris / Z// 41e� /Wa 4 (-Jr ,,.: ,, J N c _ _ Fe G 3 Z l/` r+S/Pinc�o,ze_�- 0-y- CL � s,4 -i,C� GI-0Q' /9 A �Z/(o '� � 00� Q( J _/ �� /,., ,��5 tr,2 v 4, 1-1,,,file , 1 z—t 0 A5 1 viAZ re_ Cf 4,0-t-k-A__re9._ ,fie-sti i I I)- 0 6 ki---s I l i ,Ass),vn ooir e e, k0 u r ,a/ LlOr,a7- y /07/e `a/ ' ,`; ,e,1r,P Bit- . 44074/ 44-v/on> /a) imdxy,710_ iefit iti , Q0 v` 4,-0z3 4z_ (20 3 z(i ' �f � Pr ��C 79, Dcs'4,7�, // A-A /wore '�% �. ,) ass�1< r es ,, Wf / .,o e -0-)ate✓ ,_.0,,_,,, ji/l14w .LA,,c, A.) 1E- eke) x v ka- \111,-- / , Mil I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods . Since the large majority of our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake. Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction . Signature Printed Name Street Address 2 5c An( M PEARELL 92S LIA EiJooz DANE 'OJ . O EA' Se WOzn�a k Cl /000 1—ak�v06�d br j e • a-14u4es 15,1,4 ® b L.w rztoo° ►�` -, R,e),3 /U1A/AAI/US - 10.50 /(ECX36 D �le- . 0 e J / ' Apt ;r-Slay. ,a.i. L. ' R 7 c 2 a'l(ewcao tt. Ur i NA/A JP Sp.ehm .eie 9 ;,a..0_,e 4 e i r A 0 0&a0,�. Ga`fE. -F5Liv..) Pad ad-P d, 4 441 64,{„.4„e. a ele12--. t3414ed lexe, 4440 ate,k 4, . F,AI.1<ePP S ,,re au g1$ Lake- h/een 1IR. r,`er a. k rs ' 7 7S G aL-br•, a=L < i t/�N Er' 1�SL/ 4S D J- ioo}a Z .2.// - , . 6 /©9- Acyofi.' /&A eaee ` <r 37Ertitio.., ebo u C /�% . �� rV AUire G � h HI� ' , aedge.s` o --P- 114. W o n d Lane, s —1; ? WcUL7112kfice, 92S Lake cJoo el, S)r , n 7:30 /v,9 I am a citizen of Southlake, and I believe any change to the ordinance regulating types of construction materials for commercial properties must continue to protect residential neighborhoods . Since the large majority of our city is still unzoned and undeveloped, there is no effective guarantee what zoning may ultimately be given to any vacant parcel in Southlake . Therefore, the most effective protection homeowners can be given that unsightly buildings will not be located near their property, is to require any commercial structure built within 1, 000 feet of a residential neighborhood, be of acceptable masonry construction. Signature Printed Name Street Address 4bc-m-Ce----fr- 1 Qua 77ifoN Zs-3 z C`t�crevai/ 7 I'm;I Gt);((lams 3/3 / _�RIRg ln/lrj(i� ) / //A Gh e ('.7) Ng y �/ - xr /1 T� 1�dx)rirv��_.e--tSacJ./5-0/%/c" Z-4a.0 FEB1 r 1988 February 15 , 1988 OFFICE OF CITY. SECRETAR, Sandra LeGrand City Secretary ' I City of Southlake Southlake , Texas 76092 Dear Ms . LaGrand , This package contains fifteen pages of signed petitions voicing the wishes of 160 residents about topics currently under discussion by both the Planning and Zoning Commission , and City Council . A group of concerned home owners in the Cross Timber Hills subdivision would like the enclosed to be entered into the official city record of both bodies . The petition reads as follows : 111 The undersigned home owners of Cross Timber Hills agree that • collectively we prefer the: current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : ' 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . I '! 2 . ) To protect existing„one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by, LJ any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . Ms . LeGrand , thank you for your able assistance once again in this matter . Sal ations , W. ine Fer son Jr . I WBF/lcp City. ltr li III PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre . approximately 21 . 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1 /2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE 6 f I ,,' / a ;,/iWbtecty A,,v; - 35 / a . -,f;i4ly f060c 1336 ec,j,/r 6/ C /- U I j-� ��� G M, 1� ,fi n k 7 r,� ��,�Sk �6 z.6 � \lkinv- Vatet tc, -2 Q/-- .L / �� , G,�� •y�/ �a 1 Q , -ram—dor it l i ,, i I i ) i / 4 ICH4t,fP , . /u.7 V 1zi� 1�� 1/11ifi3 -� ,. Ir v 2-/2 Y)' � 73Ka Tom, . c �f f 2 S,) 7S /e j E 1 1 /cti/J.- /35C, i rk r)- r- 1 r v I `NI - I .67 ' , ,\I1,,.Lc_ '.) -fa - f I CAL t : i �dv cu .0 /35V 7 u .- // ..1S'/-ZD9�/ c� 1,2/z S' I t' — --��n . I V ct/ 41 — 2 D�'i 'tom ' 2.'/z—2'o • /351 ,✓� ' Of 4 773 ! _/I - 'gex yZ .4 a PiCk-ZC , k Q>- /339 I � . -Yl-(ob ( Y >ct- i. a_/3 _ l 1 • • • PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . I 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial . or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . INAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE i • /1- r •' i 1/37••3 b( se 5`i/_S,54-D • z/z. 8 5(1 1 .�1 : A r33a (mow 6 �/ i /- e3# 2. jf r/ r 1 /4. a , Ap, r 1 ' ' I;.- -4.. Pr 1 A 71s 44 ii TM • i` u. -4r.. . _ ,,iiiiwse I it Sim. 5s75ir 1 ill, MOWN' iir-- , • . 11 , ei 'ma, 0.11 AU erg '-, I ,- , 1J tY81 1 ,313 N)EcelDiv (i{ r\ 4g l- 2./-l43 .4 - 2--/3-PY1 IIii(LA-A-ei)-77- 0., I 1/0~ ./335-/y�Rhaw 6/P4 ! 1 ck,-/c— , 1 e1/,l �e a_- /3 i1,1*mOcdtjAl \- 3 S'-' a et,clo .Gtei\ : ' (i-Fl- k.s/ (r 1 AAJ.C.. if Al —0—if 1 ) 3 37 l `e_,J , ' c/p,, { z1 ' /7 7 A, ,Z- /3-D S ' 1 --1 6-- d>4,7 al --/s3-Fr/! I Gi it • tip6 -6 _ c ; e ; 2'13 ? Ji' Gro ve.s /3,39 a-64' ' Y.) /- to 6 (n (1 -7) 1 1 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to - build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE W.C. 14 1Lam. 13 2co L6� ,tt-,. L/32&- Sea4, 9✓ Afr., Q 4o3- q-N LDiCg 6/ f b 6 � �? /-, 6 4' - �ppou I ige A AWAY ec_14 (- kairz-ccdcio l 36.2 44-irr;uthe,i LI R I/0Y —sY 0v I/ , I I a e__[_ PkJIiS Let eee,a Vim- / ��w, / �d 9/G T (, �_e.iuinvi o_AJ ► 3(Q-7 A0koruu0 )-'?m ' J al_ jJA-vx NiC. 6..A C� l J col Ln ,E l�^,} l o t qr.( LJ wLL,, - ` -Sd L_ / 9 . 6'4 /.3 J.161-kairw IN d-q95 ; e,,,e, 44 DekA /35to t,q460e-Ki z ( -0 3 4 e 2 z-io-g7' r., le /0• 1 . / Gf1 `ice V/ /PI —/ p -�Y�' MOREYWeoD] ! 355 1-l4,LiV! ►JJ 4S 1 S29 4 0,0-om 411d 1 2-y10/ S'g 1 it ,�� t _Vick I) D o v g a.._ 13 G / C,4 r<e v 1 e� Li DES'- fro 6, 6 ( �C,l , )404 /yam PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order 'to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre . approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAM ADDRES TELEPHONE IG DAT 4 . , , 1/ "5—, � z 4l Ai //-��� � �3�� i tvri. 1 ,--, . W/10-- 1 i ,S ed , ,?/^ ‘ V-52- Laaf 1 itil)JI jy‘ I p,Y,N ctinJ \-549 AktArilA,' k) AI_ LK ) -69 )7, ifge„ 1 v-i)5/6/ I j ,Demmis itd-e 05° bkeo,eto M.. 18l'-4137,Z cl'i, ,0 a/ NO 63/.6t*WesliusretaYQ (3 5 0 t, u eL4S �I ?) -.4 31 a , n,�.c. )3� Ode;e /�6 L�,ire v,e�M. `17/-8©a/ ' Le f 2-7/3 jil :lit r_.Z 13 / .40 P'/— e'�'-'d / �-- 6 , r ,,.V�t.P.n - I I374 b--1/ILik) )1/ " #/- 67Z 1,!�� ��, z�/3IFc a 71 , I/ 12 /7 NI, ; i /O / l iLq, e(ueL.., ; `8l - OS �0 r �! 37.J�" / 9 :-- 0i. • tea ' 1 , j /� l \g"4t 1!J„ 4u� %fcis'&„/ ,. -- • .:.Sg-/ l j. r j r i 1 ("1'47 4 dif-Aate 1.2 11.3 AY i 645e#0fittrhOSO i I % l.at-vi ef,0 Di. �7? - 50(f e 1 . '741/1:4-40- 71/3/8;e1 I I PETITION I The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore . we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by, any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed, then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE; 9haiie /192.5e0 i37g lallaiad fr. qv- /37 - AdaigAlez,vii 21/31w1 75 ,- n_iw,errFCrG ormi 13 7J, 1e eci ee-r ZV', S/d/- /3 9 4 � — /i1�� ''" l � '/LL . (-OK A M1zf,/Iok/e�GY /3v( (,�00 4�roo/ �;,t rgg -8SP y ,.) - ' S ?-/ /V ' „, e./ .v e-is id q a)t3e--PAreok z/f7.--zs---0 0 cZa?z-Ar-kr. 1 , Dtid &I BB S /3'7'7 Gc ood/6;ro ak se/-750 0 -/3--g8` —.2 -Mis /34/7 Esc :4 ?/-7-9Z 5 iiritee--;76 � �e1 I E?1g ?�/i 135�//�o�D/�i2oo� 4Sl^$ Z� 41— P4 -- `5-/3-Ag 2Uit?& / 3S &XX7bof Lie/Hof1.77 b 1331 w0,9 � 1'- t7I . - ?/3%a' f , a e- G �� � 3/J /3 , a �' l. 6cf- 335E J� .p / :,—� 43/e ' q0 rr et r/ --. /' 1 j I ti ii R6P r_rf lcivnie /)�3 t()6A �X l�Lr�. 140 — 011 tZs— ,0/irev4p-/3-eri I .,. 1 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . I 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by, any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed, then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . INAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE /'3 �� � 1 ,hfla ,)nit 3 ( noo►rttRa) _r.) - 4 I -2-1-4-\k C l /��,O1LA - '2- 177 i e '. r1 eU A . 7 JOOA??1 k a "I gl-gq 4 , L�jLf. r/' " ' , . E4u 1 1. aim 1356 WoedbytioL. Lln gb(`51271 ' AIMEE 2 13 q)6. /' -X l -55 (1)CiPetk &/z / . - 5_ii0 ? i -2 3 144 1" , r . r�sar��.v���r� ' ' $ 44,11,1t1.4 =EMI qTg 11636 , 1 1 •‘ /4 W/3/28"- (7:,--r- _ - •,- ,‘ / 07,--,-- '2/3 ffr AllArB17 / / z/FW / one I AP 4 ) / - " - -c...3 (PE-- , _.,..„, ,i6e, %. 4., 4.-- ,R:-/. _-ieif , I/ d,eu i___o litait' IMEMIM° if ( 0.S 45 e / 06:J7:AMMEN (-(g -q 6 6 V /)1 I ' i, r� ' ,1 T t •166, It •1 ,f u. l? O 44£6,/£a) iC. 14P-0 I ' ! j Oki Spa IN l- z iAt 0 (L 4& GM �`r3vq,% 1 I. i , - 0 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre . approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1 /2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE j� L—L L1j ! c G' I — ' l ( rl I -Atz�� �t Fe ti.•-is CC 133�r \-c c E C- '-t- \ -SN cT) j �L . E 1!i ti��c� ;� - J D" ���O�I t�r1•) i Op�1A 134 R Fopuf L6ito 4 -6 )16, 14,c,,,,, — ,C/.�s( _ 1.4_� s .',, ICyr Qc1,�)ds' 1 '�q � �v ����— lisdghl '� ��— � ,, 7- too Li OR >F.rirvtl /341 ror-es-t i-otlf, et R l- UfiV i -a, - 0 / 8, IOr eh , (4lc 1/ 7 Forc7s ' L/�/ o3 q 4.•i �� 'a l3-�'a� ‘i i e642es( h - 5ukt‘4 )335 motes; -z-/e LIg -1S ic- 4 ,)v,,,.x j,l „,5_, Sue'rt- ' l-318 !i2r�e5f ,LCt;1 - 4'S I -S// '�W lli1 a 1 �13/f�" j 1 LL v / V►�K oz eggs { 13 43 FoRcs-1 L . �9 38 - €3 1 i 1 �,41‘: c 3 S� i {JoMO L -1i,)F-1 6xo J. 1 evTdiJt1i tE- /UE Si -7644 � � e u a� 1�-$ 2.-ido .r- ! z,6 / i- u y ,(e/- ��0-0 .L� e/c),,-4.� I -/`l- '- Ailil)511/1464207".( 13 ,d uu ip MILL VP --1e7S- ! uti,(n` 57,ii,e;1_,-/4-6,41 1 411 . . - PETITION • The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to 1 decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 ; 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This ' would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . - 3 . ) No industrial - or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . 140 NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE DD ''I /35/7 .Woo elbrock G i/ //I • A - 'O'-sir ' ' litC dra Al 1-1r4 s'eri ,. V e0i► 133 VU00bRezK.0-1 !4'1-. (9"3 j ti /i3/ 1 o gif-s l 3 0�� � e,�,� c r �q'L INriiet)-0410441Lti �-j�31 gg ,,, , ; !1• ,,,,j,,,g, 7/J7 21131 g • 1rJ f.9!►I( 1201 (40,4 Cre4c / , �<-7 27. ' 1 �,,7a,//; 13/r�� 1 r, Z A3gr« Lae Zae.a /'/_N• iziJ-/° / 1 i.,�i. 1, .-/3 d'� y LL f 1 ,/ 4411107 i, Yam►+l�Pi21Ji?r� iY °JQ`fl'C!/U � � � 2.-/3_dytrifir , - , .-./ -Fs on-4 n pi 332i /-'/ /,' a 5 fJI !•f ;di R 3 3P .-, i is — Ci Illingt - 2 ` -•$a+ i' iffri. fLei/5°,7 /j.ia Q.ie ,- eV-1/ .i-*1--- I" ied,,, ' ../Y'ff,/ t;i ./V-,, i A ;. 2 -C . .Uar .4/-- 4ir ' eft-7-5/a {,' . , 02-/3-efI •O., j fi t • f i j j • 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial . or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NA E ADDRESS TELEPHONE • SIGN DATE 1A� :Au: 6:4, 4/, )37r2 L'A,,i. ?d/—o 7,� 1 _,�.,�, -, Mo l�� i (/7 3 6 ; -a�c�,,/-r� flyc,t i L � ... 7 '�J ! �� i • �r 1 M Pry/► acD 13�5 �vcc, �a i'�� I/- 7el as- ,— ' --/ '_& 09 yI jilt_ a . I i .0/24 13/6 rid/ � $,#c �2— 2 I , � Ps c3 ! a- 615- td lacy, ge,662w ortq Abi-c..‹./ z 2-)3i?— 273‘ ,j ' ! yI,yf Ar2,560 1W 1 ,10 ' r5+ L-4 1, "T l5 1—g-3v 3 .1, /J, " ') --/+- d2 Z 1741,4- i9 7 ./.356-- --e,93,1/ co WI—Ark i , 7 • 1 'd i W-6.1A., --- c.:2-1,--49-\ I 3 yx 31)467/7'--4/Ni (1 f —)--c?' 7 D i ,-.--' es. '-e-- 1.2 -1 (1,(-61 li ! ��C; L, o ! 13 (a .4 f�� g1- ,7 I A� _< i i i 1 i ( , 7,i ; ; i 1 I 1 I 411 PETITION IThe undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to Protect our investment and way of life : I1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre . approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be I allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . / 411 NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN . j DATE 1 detri / V,__'2)-3)6e5_ -07,e4e 71/2 26, Li ii,„- ! , 1 I4I 0'/Z. 4 I 1 ail at WittigA /3(a Cross 7:�.I L Or_, j Lia43 5/ Al —`-' ; .2.a. -,- li.icgy li t cia I3sise,�ossT, th OA- 9,I61v/ i' i /3-�� /t i/3S5 02�. j � 7//6 ai j c.I. —/3 —XV, witv...,- i3Qp re,05s1--..akeick 44--z049 i k-NicActt \t-0,14_ '3r:31-. nirc).%Tinac L-k--', \ -5999 1.--ryi- yattikp?6?—a-n' All ' t j __ J `k -i 0 J • i 1 4 I j f 4 I - i i i i • 411 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by, any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . • NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE /SIG ' DATE /737 7721/ aP i3*/G 651.57 /VA9?1 13`?C7_ t't5/02/v Ce-r,"4/ S68'7_ / p 1 z/,3/��' s Olt /7�-12 .6'14r4 1 t‘/,>-, 74 3 " 6z_L-A-- -/''70 a9/11/1)f la t t, /V 4514 ,1,9yEui cv -/e2- 4 /c%. eiC I o?-'c' 11, 1 1 III PETITION IThe undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate I growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . .Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : I1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre . approximately 21 . 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where bv , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre . then 3/4 acre lots would be I allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre I subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . I ® N'AME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE 'i �' , : < .�v �1 /2/7 i I,�0 i&c{-4� C�!��� 7 t/Z� l; J. 7_� i,2 - %L A.7 I f nn I I tiJ L22-1 . H©V--7A-1,l `--O. 1 i_' 1 -y atOO v 14�l.��Q ,t ;2/� f Ii ; i21� jMo2��r.f �� ¢8J -`75�-�- 1jp , A 114 , . • I � �Z1 Mm..,, '' -?¢�q 7_ ��}� 'T.i I j ! i — ; t I i I I 111 PETITION owners of Cross Timbers Hills The undersigned home agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will nave to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 . 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial . or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE ' f /Y1/466/ F./S c Rex- / )/ th00i 6 c Lid! YY/ - a�" 7 �t10.no;,\L du-Jul 1-/5- nurccG 15041-kp b j 1374 Woo, ,6r240t< i/ 1/ - 56'33 �,, } �—/`�—�'F i I R0 W. 13Di-A IL)b /3741 Wvaar3,FoO4 ',v litS/ -SAY33 , z 1 �Pf f i l j r N j � t i i I j I 1 � I j I a 1 I 110 PETITION The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : 1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by , any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial . or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . III NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGN DATE net idp,h4,e' /i5raleato-Z 4 ,r. 9 / zeti z�j24M .lop • L 1 I 1 � i I I I ti I 1 I � � I i ! L { f I I ; ; i I S IPETITION I The undersigned home owners of Cross Timbers Hills agree that collectively we prefer the current one acre requirement for home construction . However , we realize that in order to stimulate growth and increase our tax base that lot sizes will have to I decrease . Therefore , we state the following in order to protect our investment and way of life : I1 . ) Lot sizes not to be less than 1/2 acre , approximately 21 , 500 square feet . 2 . ) To protect existing one acre subdivisions , require any new subdivisions to use a step down lay out . Where by. any lots adjoining the current one acre subdivision would also be 1 acre , then 3/4 acre lots would be allowed , then down to a minimum of 1/2 acre lots . This would create a buffer of gradual lot size reduction within the new subdivision and around the current 1 acre subdivisions . 3 . ) No industrial or commercial developments be allowed to build adjacent to existing residential developments . III NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE AN — DATE +e✓e_ keil'er: I13dgG460A,,,,,/_ 1 , 46—�-'‘9 i.�? �1 / y • ,/ i e -A, 3a RJ I. - 0 - le; —(r /'0, cc ,A, , GS . millillim IP 1 i 1 f , ■ =air 167717A City of Southlake Duthla a INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Tabled on 2/16/88 meeting DATE: 3/1/88 FROM: Finance Department Renee McCarty TO: Budget Comparison Report SUBJECT: Budget Comparison Data for the month of January, 1988 • The following charts and budget comparisons are provided to exhibit the financial performance of the City of Southlake for the month of January, 1988 . Revenue and expenditure projections are compared to actual with the use of charts produced by software outside the City, available on a one time basis . In the interest of time and money, the budget comparison reports are computer generated material . To the best of my knowledge, all year to date figures are correct. A negative figure will appear in the Current Expenditure column when a general ledger adjustment has been made , which is greater than the current expenditure. For example , a clerk' s wage in the Administration Department should have been allocated so that a portion of it is applied to the City Secretary/Mayor/Council Department. The allocation was made for the first time this month; therefore, it was made for four months . Another good example is account number 314. 00 in the Police Department. A negative figure appears here because there were no current expenditures , and a check was voided, originally issued in a prior period. An example in the Water Fund Revenue Report is account 320 . 00 Garbage Tax. The negative activity here represents an adjusting entry that reclassed the figure to a liability account . It was posted as a - revenue in December and reclassed in January. Feel free to contact me with any questions you may have . I - - - -- -- - - ---- - -- - - - -' -- - - - - - - - - --I CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CASH FLOW 1987 - 88 Thousands $1400 $1200 , %A $1000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 I I I OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FISCAL YEAR RECEIPTS I DISBURSMENT - - GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • . FISCAL YEAR 1988 T I-1 o!-i ,.:_i I-1,_1 s; / ,'IlitlQ tl-T-- • ;8OO . . .. r i4 . _ :%. �j•*=- 5. rr..r BUDGETED REVENUE YEAR TO DATE L_____I BUDGETED EXPENDITURES YTD VA-1 ACTUAL REVENUE RECEIVED YTD \ ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS YTD ***FIGURES ARE CUMULATIVE _.-.-. GENERAL FUND REVENUES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FISCAL YEAR 1988 Ti ,,,a,-0,3 (33 . 33% OF THE YEAR) $1400 S1200 $1000 $800 • $600 -.03-- • W --,---,--e- S400 .::--.,,,,--.-,;,-.,,- -..-...,:-.: 89,813 OF 3-=::-:-- =%- -' BLDG IS IBM 3- ,...-- 200 --.5:- ---, - ,,,-, immi____ M? Ad val Sales Franc (,-__ ,,Dul t Bldg Zoning Other Rev PROJECTED FY28 - -, ACTUAL YTD OCT, NOV, DEC, Jii\ri ____ i • . . . . REVENUE PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Thousands $700 . - WOO. - $500 - %' i l.- / / $400 - „.„,:z. $300 r $200 f'� i !".,-____ „ it.. , �0 OCT, c_} DECJANFEBMAR APR kilAY JUN JUL AUG SEP L ( 1 � V DE� FCC • L 2J ANTICIPATED BUDGETED • OCT - JAN ACTUAL REVENUES • ' ANTICIPATE THAT 88 . 2% OF THE BUDGETED REVENUES WILL BE RECEIVED. 2/26/88 ems... -_ - GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FISCAL YEAR 1988 ThOLHal-HE; (33 . 33% OF THE YEAR) 8 0 0 -- $e 0 0 .1400 $2 0 0 10 ADM (.--:ouRT FIRE PC.,L I CE BLDG STREET PIA,R1,-S PW P Rai EC..T E C.) F 88 ACTUAL YID OCT, NOV, DEC, JAN I MEM- IMMO 1MM MEM _I REVENUE PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Thousands $700 $600 $500 • $400 $300 $200 $100 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ANTICIPATED BUDGETED OCT - JAN ACTUAL REVENUES ANTICIPATE THAT 88 . 2o OF THE BUDGETED REVENUES WILL BE RECEIVED. 2/26/88 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ENCUMBRANCE REPORT PERIOD ENDING JANUARY, 1988 DEPART. ACCOUNT NUMBER PURCHASE AMOUNT SUB-TOTAL SUB-TOTAL NO. ORDER NO. BY ACCT BY DEPT 100 100100552500 1343 $ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100100582500 1438 80.00 80.00 180.00 105 100105530500 1279 32.00 32.00 100105557400 1570 25.00 25.00 100105564000 1183 86.38 86.38 100105570000 1651 180.00 180.00 100105571000 1651 221.00 221.00 544.38 -I 110 100110552500 1510 1,200.00 100110552500 1502 238.35 1,438.35 1,438.35 I 120 100120531600 1423 24.79 24.79 100120562500 1551 428.65 100120562500 1552 10.64 100120562500 1514 9.04 I 100120562500 1543 125.00 100120562500 1477 250.00 823.33 100120566500 1549 147.50 I 100120566500 1548 123.20 100120566500 1553 175.00 445.70 1,293.82 I 130 100130521200 100130531500 1485 155.00 155.00 1430 155.40 155.40 100130532500 1481 250.00 250.00 100130562500 1482 250.00 250.00 810.40 ' J 150 100150582500 1128 143.76 100150582500 1365 83.82 227.58 I100150534500 1600 2,728.00 2,728.00 2,955.58 200 200200523400 1587 68.00 68.00 I 200200562500 1605 11.65 200200562500 1603 4.22 200200562500 1368 57.74 73.61 200200564000 1331 75.00 75.00 I 200200567000 1333 50.00 50.00 200200582500 1602 5.00 200200582500 1161 180.00 185.00 451.61 I $7,674.14$7,674.14 $7,674.14 I o/ %b4ru Page 1 MONTH January 1988 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PI • BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT T'ERMITS ISSUED: TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT i THIS MO. OF FEE LAST MO. OF FEE Single Family 1 1,374. 50 4 ' 4,304. 50 oundation -0- -0- -0- -0- Commercial -0- -0- -0- -0- ommercial Add/on 2 1,138. 00 1 81. 00 Additions/Accessory Bldg. 6 1,598.00 4 567.00 Miming Pools 1 252.00 3 504. 00 Jub-Contractors: Electric 12 905. 05 12 11,941.28 Plumbing 11 487.50 12 1 ,139.25 Heat/Air 4 197. 00 3 2,398. 00 Septic -0- -0- 6 360. 00 Culvert -0- -0- 3 195. 00 Demolition -0- -0- • -0- -0- )ther Fees: Septic Letters 3 45 . 00 4 60. 00 • C.O. 1 25. 00 3 75 . 00 IMisc. Building 4 104. 00 9 248. 00 .1isc. Sales: Accident Re orts 16 44. 50 20 40. 00 P I City Maps 9 28. 00 9 26. 00 Copies 6 6 . 00 3 8. 00 'Signs 3 150. 00 -0- -0- chools -0- -0- -0- -0- Excavation -0- -0- -0- -0- FOTAL 79 6 ,352.55 96 21 ,947.03 _BUILDING DEPOSITS TO DATE THIS YEAR: 94 ,567. 14 BUILDING VALUATION THIS YEAR YEAR TO DATE 'single Family 310,000. 00 1 ,703 , 880. 24 oundation -0- 0 'Commercial -0- 11 ,745 , 140. 00 (Commercial Add/on 196 ,64.2.29 259 ;442. 29 AdA; tions/Accessory .Bldg. 214 ,649. 57 389 , 031 . 97 ISv ling Pools 25 ,000. 00 158 ,500. 00 Scnools -0- -0- I TOTAL 746 ,291 . 86 14 ,255 ,994 . 50 I_ . _ _ A , / , . . ) i �_-- PAGE MONTH January 1988 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT PERMITS ISSUED: TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT THIS MO. OF FEE LAST MO. , OF FEE Single Family 1 1 ,374.50 Commercial Add-on 2 1,138.00 Commercial -0- -0- Additions/Accessory Bldg. 6 1,598. 00 Swimming Pools 1 252.00 Misc. Sales 31 78.50 Foundation Only -0- -0- Sub-Contractors: Electric 12 905.05 Plumbing 11 487.50 Heat/Air 4 197.00 Septic -0- -0- Culvert -0- -0- ' Demolition -0- -0- Signs 3 150.00 Schools -0- -0- Other Fees 8 174. 00 TOTAL 79 6 ,354. 55 BUILDING DEPOSITS TO DATE THIS YEAR: 6,354.55 BUILDING VALUATION THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE Single Family 310. 000. 00 310,000.00 Commercial Add-on 196 ,642.29 196,642 .29 Commercial -0- -0- Additions/Accessory Bldg. 214 ,649.57 214 ,649.57 Swimming Pools 25 .000.00 25 ,000.00 Foundation Only -0- -0- ' TOTAL 746 ,291. 86 746,291.86 • 1 MONTH January 1988 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT I IMPACT FEES : TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT THIS MO. OF FEE LAST MO. OF FEE ' Road Impact 1 1,000.00 Year To Date Road Fees 1,000. 00 Sewer Impact 1 500.00 ' Year To Date Sewer Fees 500.00 I � #ze#411-_,dgriSubmitted by: ( ddilAj I • • • . . r I I11.111 J 11 In'.l'nii i nn�.I I I b. i" FJSCA1 ___All _ I .1.987-19138 - .egory OCIDDCR NOVF mclR DECEMBER JANUARY FEBUARY MARQl ':tinily $1,189.50: $1,447.00 $4 , 304. 50 1 ,374. 50 vitiation -0- -0- -0- -0- nnercial -0- , 51,699.00 -0- -0- nn. Add $684.00; 17.00 81.00 1 ,138.00 1./Acces. $594.00 776.00 567. 00 1 ,598.00 Pools $635.501 207.00 504 . 00 252. 00 ectric $723.88. 385.07 11 , 941 . 28 905.05 ['riling $2,007.00 2,241.00 1 , 139. 25 487.50 • at/Air $218.00: 1,348.50 2,398. 00 197.00 . ptic $105.00' 480.00 360. 00 -0- • l vert $65.00 260.00 195. 00 -0- rolition -0- ' -0- -0- -0- Letters $90.00 120.00 60. 00 45.00 ). $125.00, 25.00 75 .00 25.00 a c. Bldg. -0- 113.00 248. 00 104 .00 dd. 1lgiurts $56.00: 75.00 40. 00 44.50 ty i<lvs $46.00: 26.00 26. 00 28.00 1>'les - _ $5.10. .60 8. 00 6. 00 • gns $215.00 100.00 -0- 150.00 - !Tools -0- -0- -0- . -0- ;avation -0- 189.00 -0- -0- • ma r ` . . w -- - - I'.Y�.•'1'.11 lit j 11 akin OCIOBCR 1'OV1?1131 1 DEC1NI3EI1 JANUARY as MY itlN1C1 - ad Impact $1,000.00 $25,928.00 $4,000.00 • $1,000.00 w1,•er Impact • $500.00 $13,064.00 $2 ,000.00 $ 500.00 • • MONTH January, 1988 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT IMPACT FEES : TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT THIS MO. OF FEE LAST MO. OF FEE Road Impact 1 1,000. 00 4 4,000.00 Year To Date Road Fees 31,928.00 Sewer Impact 1 500.00 4 2,000.00 Year To Date Sewer Fees 16,064.00 II Submitted by: • ? 4J CATEGORY OCTOBER N0VEMBER I1EL'I:MBER JANUARY FEIUARY MARCH Organizational , Registration: $105.00 $15 .00 _0_ • Rental , Lodge Deposits, Lodge Lights: • Dallfield /1 $20.00 • • Anllfield I3 Field Prepare. . • Concession: Rental • Sales • ' I ZONING DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE For The Month Ending January 31, 1988 Zoning $ 100.00 No . of Cases 2 Platting 520.00 No . of Cases 2 Board of Adjustment No . of Cases 0 Special Exception Use No . of Cases 0 Site Plan 465.50 No. of Cases 1 Misc . Sales ( Zoning) 145.30 No . of Receipts 6 Total Revenue $1,230.80 Total No . Cases 9 1 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE III FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT TO: City Manager, Lloyd O. Latta , Jr . For the Month of January 1988 THIS YEAR MONTH TO DATE Responses Structure Fires House 0 0 Mobile Home 0 0 Office Building 0 0 Retail - Restaurant 0 0 Factory - Industry , etc . 0 0 IGrass Fires 3 3 Car Fires 1 1 F. Truck Fires 2 2 Car Accident - 2 2 ITruck Accident 4 . 4 IMutual Aid for City cf Grapevine 4 4 Mutual Aid for City of Colleyville 0 0 IMutual Aid for City of Keller 0 0 Mutual Aid for Trophy Club 0 0 - 7 7 Fire Calls in Westlake IEMS Calls in Westlake 4 4 Fire Calls in Tarrant County 3 3 IEMS Calls in Tarrant County 2 9 I • Fire Calls in Denton County ] ] ( + EMS Calls in Denton County 0 0 IFalse Alarms in City ] a False Alarms in Tarrant County 0 (0 I FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT PAGE 2 THIS YEAR MONTH TO DAL_ RESPONSES False Alarms in Denton County 0 0 False Alarms in Westlake 0 0 Ambulance Calls in City 14 14 Rescue/Ambulance Assist Calls in City 9 9 Miscellaneous Call ( see attached sheet ) 6 6 TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS 63 63 TOTAL FIRE LOSS VALUE $300 S30: Man hours Expended: Numb Of hc:: On Emergency Calls 25E Meetings (4 per month ) 4 E Average men per meeting 12 Special Training Sessions or Drills Maintenance (other than normal maintenance ) TOTAL MAN HOURS EXPENDED Special Remarks : I 1 I Respectfu] ] y Submitted , / h . P ? c c T Fire Ch ei 1 Date : / 8/ FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT IPAGE 3 MISCELLANEOUS CALLS FOR MONTH OF JANUARY 1988 ' F88-002 - Down Power Line/Pole F88-017 Gasoline Spill F88-020 - Natural Gas Leak ' F88-026 - Smoke Investigation in House F88-039 - Diesel Spill ' F88-042 - Dumpster Fire 1 1 1 1 1 1 I - i ' ' • '.MONTHLY POLICE REPORT January 1988 PRESENT PAST YEAR TO MONTH MONTH , DATE . TOTAL RADIO CALLS 2992 3163 2992 TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 794 532 794 ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED 32 16 32 1 Major Accidents (Involving Injury) 6 . 7 6 Minor Accidents (Property Damage Only) 26 9 26 -r TOTAL WARRANTS ; 64 37 ..64 Total Warrants1 Served 65 73 .65 Total Amount .Collected 8320 8000 8320 TOTAL ARREST 5 - 106 _4_ 68 106 Felony Arrests. • .- 10 2 •10 Misdemeanor Arrests 78 66 •'78 Juvenile Arrests 18 17 '18 TOTAL CASES FILED 22 9 22 Felony 5 2 5 Misdemeanor 13 7 13 Juvenile Referrals - 4 1 4 TOTAL OFFENSES REPORTED 34 . 35 .34 H TOTAL . OFFENSES CLEARED 11 14 11 CLEARANCE .RATE 32% _ 40%. -32f BURGLARIES REPORTED 9 ' 8 ._ '9 •. Value - 'Stolen Property 20369 _ 1352 20369 Value - -Recovered Property 2300 - 50 • • 2300 p,• THEFTS REPORTED 15 15 45 Value - Stolen Property ' + 13092 2338 ' 13092 Value - Recovered Property 17214 1296 17214 - . -r CRIME PREVENTION PRESENTATIONS • 1 0 1 — SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1987 ANNUAL REPORT I PERSONNEL: 1986 1987 1988 SWORN PERSONNEL 13 18 19 ICIVILIAN PERSONNEL 5 5 6 18 23 25 • I POLICE ACTIVITY 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 17,695 16,725 32,718 TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 4,330 6,247 7,125 TOTAL ARRESTS 404 594 742 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 264 279 268 I I I I I I PART ONE POLICE PATROL ACTIVITY 1986 1987 TOTAL CALLS 16,725 32,718 T 15,993 or 96 TOTAL CITATIONS 6,247 7 ,125 '^ 878 or 14. 17 TOTAL ARRESTS 594 742 T 148 or 30 TOTAL ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED 279 268 4 11 or 4 ARRESTS 1985 1986 1987 FELONY 44 57 67 MISDEMEANOR 349 539 586 JUVENILE 11 46 89 404 642 742 ACCIDENTS 1985 1986 1987 NON-INJURY 176 194 203 INJURY ACCIDENTS 86 89 64 FATALITIES 2 4 1 264 287 268 1 i 1 PART TWO CRIMINAL OFFENSES INDEX CRIMES 1985 1986 1987 CHANGE MURDER/HOMICIDE 1 0 0 RAPE 0 0 1 it 1 or 100 ROBBERY 0 1 1 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 11 21 7 4 14 or 66.6% BURGLARY 119 109 79 4/ 30 or 27.5>_ THEFT 63 74 148 j` 74 or 100 °. MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 17 7 11 ' 4 or 57 7: TOTAL CRIME INDEX 211 212 247 I - ON VIEW OFFENSES 35 70 50 ell 20 or 28.5 (Narcotics, Weapons, Driving) OTHER REPORTED OFFENSES 50 55 177 1' 122 or 222 TOTAL REPORTED OFFENSES 296 336 474 1' 138 or 41 The total crime index for the City of Southlake for 1987 is 247. This is the figure that will appear in the Uniform Crime Reports for both State and Federal Crime Records Division reports. PART THREE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS ACTIVITY 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL REPORTED OFFENSES 296 336 408 TOTAL OFFENSE CLEARED 92 140 92 I CLEARANCE PERCENTAGE 31% 41.6% 22.5% STOLEN PROPERTY REPORTED $ 204,663 $ 395,392 $ 510,686 STOLEN PROPERTY RECOVERED 23,512 191 ,616 457,221 I TOTAL CASES FILED 57 91 103 Felony 18 35 42 Misdemeanor 29 51 30 Juvenile 10 5 31 CRIME PREVENTION PRESENTATIONS 9 29 14 S0UTULAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1987 QUARTERLY REPORTS POLICE ACTIVITIES 1st QUAR. 2nd QUAR. 3rd QUAR. 4th QUAR. TOTALS RADIO CALLS 8,183 7,973 8,383 8,179 32,718 TOTAL OFF. REPORTED 92 100 157 123 472 OFFENSES CLEARED 18 15 21 38 92 ACCIDENTS 57 86 72 53 ' 268 ARRESTS 228 167 202 145 742 CITATIONS ISSUED 1,822 1,883 1 ,807 1,613 7,125 CRIME INDEX 39 55 78 75 247 1987 CRIME INDEX 1st QUAR. 2nd QUAR. 3rd QUAR. 4th QUAR. TOTALS IMURDER/HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 I RAPE 0 0 0 1; 1 ROBBERY 0 0 1 0 1 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 0 5 0' 7 BURGLARY 21 27 15 16 79 THEFT/LARCENY 13 26 55 54 148 IMOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 3 2 2 4 11 39 55 78 75. 247 1 / . . 11 IBUDGET AMENDMENT IV I 2/16/88 I. 0 . I I I I I I 1 • . I ACTIVITY SUMMARY GENERAL FUND REVENUE Budget Amendment 02/16/88 EXPENSE FY86 FY87 FY87 FY88 CODE DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET REVISED TOTAL REQUEST 405.00 Contribution from Developers -0- -0- -0- 55,000 Budget Amendment Total -0- -0- -0- 55,000 Previous Budget Total $1,491,124 $2,127,505 $2,120,582 $2,382,163 (per G F Amendment) $1,491,124 $2,127,505 $2,120,582 $2,437,163 ACTIVITY SUMMARY 105 Administration Budget Amendment 02/16/88 EXPENSE FY86 FY87 FY87 FY88 CODE DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET REVISED TOTAL REQUEST 915.00 Animal Control Participation -0- 5,000 -0- 25,000 Amendment (11,000) Total After Amendment -0- 5,000 -0- 14,000 Previous Budget Total 227,483 487,949 545,498 382,032 Amendment (11,000) Effect of Anendn nt=New Budget Total $ 227,483 $ 487,949 $ 545,498 $ 371,032 ammo mom 411.11. mom. 105 ADMINISTRATION BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Budget Amendment 02/16/88 • 915.00 Animal control participation account is decreased by $11,000 (from $25,000 to $14,000) . This $11,000 is placed in the Public Works Department in the new account for the HWY 114 Engineering Study, account number 938.00. • ACTIVITY SUMMARY 240 Public Works Budget Amendment 02/16/88 EXPENSE FY86 FY87 FY87 FY88 CODE DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET REVISED TOTAL REQUEST 938.00 114 Engineering Study -0- -0- -0- 66,000 Total of Amendment -0- -0- -0- 66,000 Previous Budget Total 45,087 58,821 55,556 18,644 New Budget Total $ 45,087 $ 58,821 $ 55,556 $ 84,644 240 PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Budget Amendment 02/16/88 938.00 HWY 114 Engineering Study account has been established to accumulate costs associated with a schematic design study contracted with Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam for $66,000. $55,000 of the contracted price will be contributed by developers and the other $11,000 is taken from Animal Control in the Administration Departrnent per this budget amendment. 1987-88 BUDGET SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS Budget Amendment 02/16/88 GENERAL WATER GENERAL TOTALS FUND FUND OBLIGATION (MEMORANDUM DEBT SERV ONLY) FUND . Revenue: Taxes 1,578,163 162,284 1,740,447 Fines/Court 400,000 400,000 Licenses and Permits 298,500 298,500 Miscellaneous and Other 53,500 46,000 99,500 Impact Fees 36,000 60,000 96,000 'Water Sales 1,736,633 1,736,633 Garbage 150,000 150,000 Concession Stand 16,000 16,000 School District Contribution-Sewer Line 60,575 60,575 IBM Contribution - Water Line 103,632 103,632 Contribution From Developers 55,000 55,000 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR REVENUE 2,437,163 2,156,840 162,284 4,756,287 WITHDRAWAL FROM RESERVE 77,899 77,899 TOTAL 2,234,739 4,834,186 Expenditures: City Secretary/Mayor and City Council 52,872 52,872 Administration 371,032 371,032 Municipal Court 129,888 129,888 Fire 265,174 265,174 Police 717,683 717,683 Building/Zoning 142,471 142,471 Street 561,294 561,294 Parks 76,105 76,105 Public'Works 84,644 84,644 Debt Service 411,802 162,284 574,086 - Water Service 1,762,937 1,762,937 TOTAL 2,401,163 2,174,739 162,284 4,738,186 NET OPERATING SURPLUS 36,000 60,000 -0- 96,000 MONTH ,Ta nuzry 1 A88 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PARKS MONTHLY REPORT • GE: TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT THIS MONTH OF FEE LAST MONTH OF FEE Organizational , Registration -0- . 1 15.00 Rental , Lodge : Deposits , Lodge (Clean up) LIGHTS: : Ballfield #1 Ballfield #3 • Field Preparation Concession: Rental Sales f TOTAL -0- 1 $15. 00 Parks Deposit To Date This Year: !t140.00 1 • 1960 - DEC. TOTAL - 2 PULLED METERS 1958 - ' + 2 NEW TAPS 1960 JAN. TOTAL WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT • MONTH JANUARY 1988 GALLONS PUMPED THIS MONTH FROM WELLS 2,468,400 PURCE SED FROM FORT WORTH 19,256,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 21,724,400 NEW WATER TAPS INSTALLED 2 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 0 METER CHANGE OUTS 3/4"= 16 1"= 2 3/4" to 1"= 0 2"= 0 4"= 0 LEAXS 2 PULLED METERS 2 LOCXED METERS 10 Customer request or Delinquent Payment PROCESSED WORE ORDERS 75 FLUSHED `__ LAKE DRIVE, SUNSHINE, S. CARROLL, E. DO` LINES F £ONTIYE L, W WATER IMPACT FEES $- 1,000.00 TOTAL TO DATE $ 1,000.00 1987 - $23,500.00 1986 - $11,000.00 • ee7q 1-7771I • WATER SUPERINTENDENT • I • I MONTHLY REPORT SEND REPORT TO: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF WATER HYGIENE WATER WORKS OPERATION FOR 1100 WEST 49th STREET AUSTIN,TEXAS 78756 GROUND WATER SUPPLIES (1) Name of System CITY OF SOUTHLAKE County TARRANT (la) Water System I.D. No. 7700075 Month of .TANITARY 19 88 Day Pumpage to Distribution System in Thousand Gale. (6) (7) (8) Taste (9) of (2)Direct 1 (3)From Gnd. (4)Purchased (5)Total Disinfection Corrosion and Odor Month from Wells Storage from Others Pumpage Control Control 1 810,413 0 810,413 ON WELLS BECAUSE 36r r WATER TINE RROKF. 2 818.400 0 818,400 " rr it rr rr It rt 3 839.587 0 839,587 " tt It tt II 't It 4 0 758,000 758.000 5 0 697,000 697,000 6 0 550,000 550 .000 7 0 606,000. 606,000 8 0 682 ,000 682,000 9 0 718.000 718 ,000 to 0 807,000 807,000 tt 0 801,000 801,000 12 0 749,000 749,000 13 0 747,000 747,000 14 0 619,000 619,000 is 0 671,000 671,000 16 0 694,000 694,000 17 0 71 ,000 71 ,000 18 0 852,000 852 ,000 C:OMPTITER PRORT,FMS , 19 0 938 ,000 938,000 WATFR SAMPT.FS - MFCATTVF 20 0 463,000, 463,000 21 0 585 ,000 585,000 22 0 484,000 484,000 ('nMPTJTFR PRnRT FMS - 23 0 896.000 896,000 24 0 659,0011 659,000 25. 0 591,000 591 ,000 26 0 621.000 621,000 27 0 980,000 980,000 28 0 791,000 791,000 29 0 613.000 613,000 30 0 700,000 7nn,nnn 31 0 913,000 913,000 Total 2,468,40CJ9,256,000 21,724.4 Avg. 822,80C 621.161 700.787 Max. 839,587 980 .000 980 ,000 • Min. 810,412 0 71,000 No. of Active Water Services (10) 1960 Chemical Analysis (11) 11-R3 Dates and Results of Bacteriological Analyses (12) 7 SAMPT,FS -NFCATTVF SOUTH CARROLL Reservoirs or Tanks Cleaned (13) 8-8 7 Dead Ends Flushed (14) F. CONTTNF.NTAT, BRUMLOW ( General Remarks (15) TAKE nR IVE EAST DOVE A Submitted By (16) iLj..�, �t-e Certificate No. (17) 454-2 9-3113 FORM NO. H-a I • ., IMPACT FEES 1986 WATER $ 11,000.00 SEWER $ 10,000.00 • 1987 WATER $ 23,500.00 SEWER $ 19,967.75 I1988 JANUARY WATER $ 1,000.00 SEWER $ 500.00 IFEBRUARY WATER SEWER MARCH WATER SEWER 1 APRIL WATER SEWER MAY WATER SEWER JUNE WATER SEWER IJULY WATER SEWER AUGUST WATER SEWER ISEPTEMBER WATER SEWER OCTOBER WATER SEWER NOVEMBER WATER SEWER IDECEMBER WATER SEWER f GRAND TOTAL WATER SEWER I 1989 IJANUARY WATER SEWER FEBRUARY WATER SEWER IMARCH WATER SEWER IAPRIL WATER SEWER MAY WAtbR SEWER IJUNE WATER SEWER JULY WATER SEWER AUGUST WATER SEWER SEPTEMBER WATER • SEWER OCTOBER WATER SEWER NOVEMBER WATER SEWER 1 DECEMBER WATER SEWER WAThR TAPS INSTALLATION SEPTEMBER4- 1987 PAID 3/4" Meter INSTALLED 1. PJ'S CONVENIENCE STORE- 101 ENW PARKWAY 9-1-87 (Temporally) 9- 1-87 2. WENDELL DOBBS - 1060 THOUSAND OAKS 8-18-8 7 9- 2-87 I 3. BILL TAYLOR - 3290 LAKE DRIVE 8-17-87 9-11-87 1 4. M.W. McMILLIAN -3280 LAKE DRIVE 8-17-87 9-11-87 5. ROBERT GATLIN - 3270 LAKE DRIVE 8-17-87 9-11-87 I OCTOBER - 1987 1 1. DAVID RAMSEY - 127 N. PEYTONVILLE 8-31-8 7 9-23-87 2. JERRY McCONNELL - 1646 ROYAL OAKS COURT 10-1-87 10-14-87 I 3. TERRY SISK CONT. - 2113 GREENBRIAR 10-16-8 7 10-19-8 7 4. TERRY SISK CONT. - 2110 GREENBRIAR 10 -16-87 10-20-87 5. HOMER FRENCH-12 0 0 WEST DOVE 9-9-8 7 10-2 0-8 7 1 6. PJ'S CONVENIENCE STORE - 101 ENW PARKWAY. . . . 9-1-87 10-21-8 7 1 7. G.O. STEVENS - 1401 PLAiTATION DRIVE 10-26-87 10-27-87 1 NOVELBER - 1987 NO NEW WATER TAPS THISMONTH. 1 DECEMBER - 1987 1. MEGHANI & ASSOCIATES - 435 SHADY LANE 12-02-87 . :12-9-87 2. G.L. HITCHCOCK - 1110 HARBOR HAVEN 12-08-87 12-9-87 I 3. COLONIAL SAVINGS - 1701 RANDAL MILL 12-08-87 12-9-87 4. CUSTOM ONE HAAG & CO. - 1479 FLAMINGO CIRCLE. 12-14-87 12-16-87 I JANUARY - 1988 1. MARK STRUHS -700 S. WHITE CHAPEL 12-22-87 1-04-88 2. RICHARD OSBORN - 1204 W. CONTINENTAL 12-22-87 1-05-88 WiV1LK MILKS A1NL, LMPAU1 iGLS r " LU, AN,) I1ID ,u,. WI"1,11n, T1-1L; ,•,.A17, 1 DECEMBER 1987 WATER DEPOSITS WATER IMPACT FEES y 12- 2-87 MEGHANI F, ASSOCIATES 435 SHADY LANE 26904 $ 360.00 26903 $ 500.00 12- 8-87 G. L. HITCHCOCK 1110 HARBOR HAVEN 27020 $ 360.00 27019 $ 500.00 12- 8-87 COLONIAL SAVINGS 1701 RANDAL MILL 27026 $ 360.00 PREVIOUS WATER SERVICE AT THIS ADDRESS 12-14-87 CUSTOM ONE HAAG & CO. 1479 FLAMINGO CIRCLE 27162 $ 360.00 27161 $ 500.00 12-22-87 M. A. McCLENDON (OSBORN) 27322 $ 360.00 27321 $ 500.00 1204 W. CONTINENTAL 12-22-87 MARK STRUHS 700 SO. WHITE CHAPEL 27339 $ 360.00 27338 $ 500.00 $2,160.00 $2,500.00 JANUARY 1988 1-20-88 SUNFLOWER HOMES 1018-A DIAMOND 27888 $ 360.00 27887 $ 500.00 1-27-88 HART BOAT E* MOTOR 1219 BRUMLOW 28579 $ 360.00 28580 $ 500.00 $ 720.00 $1,000.00 LI.11':11. l.UUli l tiI ' ii l II.I:.I"')L. I . OF Januai y 1988 • . Janual-y 1987 Plea Trl Plea CASES SET FOR TRIAL . 4 CASES HEARD 16 0q 28 66 CASES DISMISSED 01 01 01 10 WARRANTS ISSUED 0_4 114 WARRANTS SERVED 65 46 CASES APPEALED 32 45 CASES RESET 11 10 PAST DUE LETTERS 57 76 CASES REFERED TO DDC 4q 24 CITATIONS ISSUED 793 803 CITATIONS PAID 319 337 TOTAL REVENUE 28 ,762 . 00 27,808. 00 FINES COLLECTED FROM COURT 368 . 00 --- WARRANTS COLLECTED 8 320.00 --- Trial for January 16 reset due to bad weather 1 Jury trial subject found guilty