Item 6IORD. NO
EXECUTUVE
SUMMARY:
REQUEST
DETAILS:
ACTION NEEDED:
ATTACHMENTS
STAFF CONTACT:
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
February 13, 2012
1056
Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan Amendment for the alignment of S.
Village Center Drive generally extending from E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) to
S. Nolen Drive
Staff requests consideration of an amendment to the Mobility and Master Thoroughfare
Plan to revise the alignment of S. Village Center Drive generally extending from E.
Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) to S. Nolen Drive.
This proposed amendment to the city's Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan would
modify the alignment of S. Village Center Drive generally extending from Southlake
Blvd. to S. Nolen Drive. The purpose for this amendment is to recommend an
alternative alignment to retain the current LOS C at the intersection of E. Southlake
Blvd. (FM 1709) and S. Kimball Ave. and improve safety around and access to the
school property at the southwest corner of S. Village Center Drive and S. Kimball Ave.
1. Conduct a public hearing.
2. Consider 2nd reading approval of Ordinance 1056
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) SPIN Report
(D) Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(E) S. Village Center Drive Extension Study — Link to Study
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 1056
Ken Baker (817)748-8067
Caroline Eckel (817)748-8195
Ord. No.
1056
-TeT•1:fr]:Wl]ki11l1kiI70]N►YileiI Eel ki
��•l�j 9:1 We1:/ N
2025 PLAN: The City of Southlake's current Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan was adopted in
2005 as a part of the Southlake 2025 Plan. Minor revisions have since been made to
address areas of importance as the city continues to develop. Generally, this plan is
used to guide the city's transportation system improvements, including existing and
planned extensions of city streets and highways. A primary objective of the
thoroughfare plan is to ensure the reservation of adequate right-of-way on appropriate
alignments and of sufficient width to serve existing and future transportation needs.
The adopted plan recommends that Village Center Drive extend south and east from
Southlake Blvd. to S. Nolen Drive. It is currently shown as a two-lane undivided
collector with a 60 foot right-of-way, with an alignment as follows: from the intersection
of Village Center Drive and Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) south, then east around
Gateway Church, continue east on the south side of the Greenway and Quicksall
properties, create a signalized intersection with Kimball Avenue, then continue east to
"T" into Nolen Drive.
The map below indicates the S. Village Center Drive alignment as included in the
Southlake 2025 Plan:
Ord. No. Attachment A
1056 Page
ALTERNATIVE
ALIGNMENT: The primary purpose of the Village Center Dr. extension is to provide improved and
safer circulation for the CISD property and the undeveloped parcels in the vicinity. A
positive side effect of the improved circulation is that it will alleviate some of the further
congestion anticipated at the intersection of Kimball Ave. and Southlake Blvd. The
development of nearby parcels will deteriorate the operation of the Kimball Ave. signal
to a forecasted level of service (LOS) D. The extension of Village Center Dr. will
alleviate the congestion caused by this development and return this signal's level of
service back to LOS C.
Alternative alignments for the S. Village Center Drive have been evaluated, shown
below as 1N, 1S, 2N, and 2S. The proposed amendment would recommend an
alternative alignment for the extension of S. Village Center Drive, while retaining a
similar course, cross-section, and description.
3A -
-
I /
♦ „"".S"9f! Ali �• •:tip. 1
rsun
�. `.
Im
Izi
pE`_-fir" _-,�lk'�i _ I • ��'
r
■ 1S/2S most closely represent the current adopted alignment.
■ 1 N offers an alternative alignment to shift the western segment of the right-of-
way further north to increase the separation from the Woodland Heights
neighborhood and allow for additional frontage along S. Village Center Drive, in
the event that the Gateway Church property were to be redeveloped. This
alignment, however, divides the parking facilities available for the Gateway
Church property and limits the developable use of the southwest corner of the
Greenway property.
■ 2N moves the thoroughfare more than 100 feet away from the northern edge of
the school building, while the current alignment, or 2S, positions the ROW 45
feet from the existing school building. 2N also provides a simpler and more
efficient geometry for the ROW, a straight line. This alignment would run
parallel to the CISD north entrance driveway causing the closure of the existing
driveway and a shift of the median opening on Kimball to the north. The school
would need to provide a new connection to S. Village Center Drive.
Ord. No. Attachment A
1056 Page 2
1 S/2N is the recommended alternative alignment as it provides a continuous path,
minimizing negative impacts on future development potential in the area and providing
for a safe distance from adjacent school facilities.
��.s.I_« r{� 1 r. !i •1•.]k�� •+ ice' � �71i"4
The following design considerations are recommended for the revised extension of S.
Village Center Drive:
• Design as a 60' foot (C2U) collector roadway with a speed limit not to exceed 30
mph.
• Design as an "Urban" cross-section roadway which includes curb gutters, street
trees and sidewalks.
• Traffic calming measures should be considered in the design of the roadway.
• At the time the roadway connection to Kimball Avenue is made from the west, the
CISD's north drive connection to Kimball Avenue shall be closed and the western
most school service drive shall be connected to the new roadway.
• Intersection improvements such as pedestrian crosswalks should be considered
at the following locations: 1) the two-way intersection located at the southwest
corner of the Gateway Church property; 2) the intersection at Southwood Drive;
3) the three-way intersection located at the corners of the
Greenway/Quicksall/CISD properties; 4) the intersection of the school's west
drive; and 5) the intersection of S. Kimball Avenue and S. Village Center Drive.
• The northern boundary of the CISD property should be fenced to minimize
potential vehicle/pedestrian conflict.
• During design of the roadway, mitigation measures of the new roadway on
adjacent residential properties such as landscaping, buffering, fencing and
screening shall be considered.
• The portion of the roadway near the intersection of the CISD school drive shall be
designed with a center turn lane in both directions to allow stacking to occur
during school drop of and pick up times.
Ord. No. Attachment A
1056 Page 3
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A city-wide SPIN Meeting was held on November 5, 2012. A summary of comments
received at the SPIN meeting are attached.
P&Z COMMISSION: January 3, 2013; Approved (5-0) subject to Staff Report dated December 27, 2012 and
Staff's recommendation of 1S/2N alternative alignment as it provides a continuous
path, minimizing negative impacts on future development potential in the area and
providing for a safe distance from adjacent school facilities.
CITY COUNCIL: February 5, 2013; Approved (7-0) at 1st reading subject to the following conditions: A
motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 1056, with the recommendation of a
1S/2N alignment and directing staff to provide language regarding residential
adjacency and buffering concerns for the 1S portion of the road alignment at the
second reading of the ordinance.
Ord. No. Attachment A
1056 Page 4
Vicinity Map
South Village Center Drive
Ordinance No. 1056
Mobility and Master
Thoroughfare Amendment
0 625 1.250 2.500
Feet
Ord. No. Attachment B
1056 Page
VS0UTHLA1<,E
C�]C7I]MkEel
PROJECT NAME:
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION:
SPIN MEETING REPORT
`tem,.
S. Village Center Alignment
Citywide
November 5, 2012; 6:00 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3C — 3D
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Fourteen (14)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Rob Baker # 1
• STAFF PRESENTING: Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services
• STAFF PRESENT: Bob Price, Director of Public Works; Steve Anderson, Civil Engineer; and
Caroline Eckel, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services (817)748-8067;
kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Details of Presentation
• The City of Southlake is considering an amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan forthe proposed
future South Village Center between Southlake Boulevard and Nolen Drive.
• S. Village Center is intended to serve as a local collector to reduce congestion on F.M.1709, while
providing residents easier access to businesses and schools.
• Two alignments have been considered and the recommended alignment is "1S" and "2N." This
alignment extends along the southern side of Gateway Church and shifts slightly north approaching
CISD property, as shown below.
The following plans were presented at SPIN:
Ord. No. Attachment C
1056 Page
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
The owners of the Quicksall and Greenway tracts do not like the 1 N" alignment because it would clip
the southwest corner of the property. We do not want to be used as a cut through property or end up
with a dead end road.
o We would work with Gateway Church to explore opportunities for continuing the
development of the road on or along their property. We may be able to use eminent
domain to acquire the needed right-of-way, but that is generally undesirable. It would be
important to complete the road through to Kimball. Council would likely consider funding a
gap here as a critical connection, and pay to put in the missing segment of the road. The
1 N" proposal was included to provide an option with additional separation from Woodland
Heights.
What is the land area of the triangle created by the 1 N" segment at the southwest corner? Would that
area become unusable?
o About a half -acre, and that property would not be appropriate for development but could be
used for open space, a landscaped buffer or pocket park. Under the 1 N" scenario, we would
work with the property owner during the development process to help determine the best use
for that portion of the property.
Would a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Village Center and Kimball?
o We will be studying these new intersections to determine where/whether a signal would be
appropriate. We don't want to encourage cut -through traffic, but we do want to allow for
adequate stacking, and relieve congestion along Kimball near the schools. As we conduct the
study, we may find that a stop sign would work better to achieve these goals.
Will there be a future connection between Kroger and Staples shopping centers?
o There is consideration for a bridge as a part of the Woodland Heights Connector project, the
city would consider a box culvert to allow for an easier connection, but the property owners
have not yet agreed.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the
general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly
encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Ord. No. Attachment C
1056 Page 2
Howard Carr
Real Estate Broker
6800 Westcreek Circle
Fort Worth, exas 76126
Jan 3, 2013
Village Center Drive Extension a11wr the signaIized intersection on
Kimball Ave_, north of Dawson Flementary School, can go North or South
Gn Kimball Ave BUT 1VUF Nast through any propei#y. You have had ainple
time to plan for the traffic cy,1xinsion which you should have planned for
years ago. You kntw how inany students would he attending from the
number of new hornes you approved and pennitted without adequate
planning For the rM[Ttirig traffic 110W. You have held rnany rrteetings
without planning for the traffic flow problenas, hoping that some magical
fairy would solve you problems for you. You should have required that the
developers have a plan even if you -didn't and require Chat they create the
necessaiy roads for their homes that you approved_
I bought my property on Kimball Ave when Southlake Blvd was a two
lane country road and lived here for twenty years before Town, Hal l even
existed. This was to be my retirement home and investment close to our
family. I have had many serious buyers looking for a medical center or
retirement home ccntar, BUT'the City of SoothIake has mn them off by
showing and telling the buyers about the CITY's road pian. NO ONE is
interested its a property with a divided highway through the MIDDLE OF IT
and all the insulting traffic and noise. You havo NOT considered my rights
as a properly owner and TAX PAYING CITIZEN, and you have succccded
ter killing and running off any prospective buyers that I have had.. Some of
the: other property owners would he-nefit by having a rear or additional entry
point to their property BUT NOT 'Tl df C.]UGH the middle: of 0wir
property!! This is a KILLER Fbi, my property for most desirable huyers,
131FF the City doesn't care about my wishcs and rights. How would you f€.TI
about the road berm, built through your home and propcily Withoul your
approval What would your reponse he if you were put in my shocs and
asked to give Kip your retirement for yourself and your family for the CITY.
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page
You laiew before you opened this school flint you hnd drastically
miscalculated the re&ulting tiatl'ic flow hrobleros. You luivc attempted to
co.er up yaur lack of planning and incompetence l>y siniply creatin4t a road
through land that you don`t even o►vti.or plan to purchase but you hope that
someone will Ai• a you their home and property for FRF.F,. How SELFISII
can you get! !'!
MY question to the City is simply again" Flow at+e you going to do this
on land that you do not own and that I vary definitely will never give tip you'?
You can plan for this road to go through your home and property lill'l' K(yl
MINE_
Thank you fir your time
Howard Carr
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 2
r�7y rr
SCUTHLAKE
r arol;ne Ertr-el cce,-keF!Tc:i.sauthlake.tx.uu>
Fwd: Agenda Item No. 15 — Planning & Zoning Meeting -- January 3,2013
Ken Bauer <kbaker ci_southlake_tx_us> Thu. Jan 3, 2013 at 2:13 PIA
Ta: Holly Blake ehblake@ci.southlake.tx_us>, Caroline Eckel <f:eckel ci_southlake_tx_us}
Forwarded message
From: Chrigy Harnmons
Date: Thur Jan 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM
Subject- Agenda Item Nor_ 15 — Planning & Zoning Meeting — January 3r 2013
To: "kbaker ci_southiake.fx_us' �kbaker ei_southlake.tx.us>
Ken_
Please submit this email to Planning & Zoning as our adamant ola ection to the change to the thoroughfare Plan that
would clip the southeast comer of our property_ We appose any alignment that would leave as with an unusable
piece of land, which this would_
Also, please present the attached agreement taetrueen Kimball 17D9, Greenway & CISD_ Please note Exhibit E. which
states that after participating in the offsite drainage (with CtSD), we could tie into the US road) Iocated to the north at
the school. This document should remain on record until atl three parties agree to abandon or change the
document_ We are continuing to taEk to CISD regarding this_
Christy Hammorrs
Vice President
Gneenway Investment Company
2808 Fairmount, Suite 1 DD
Dallas. Texas 75201
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 3
CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
1201 N. C1kflR01-1. AVENUE * SQUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 * �917) A81-37TS
TedGllurrw Ed. 1)
&ffl& nbrAenl
Jahn H. Giell
,Bob Windham
x9ael6�l ^s,prnnlarkda l for
QPffWUnaW 'nalmAWn
Am;12nt ELVAHnlan]ani W AM81enl Inr
fnencol aM Bunr DperdLn Adfmini55q0w SerYic6S
[Sin: Letter of Agreement for Offsita Drainage at
Now Intermediate and Middle Schools on Kimbatl Ave.
Sbwm water h¢anagamarri for CtSD 5crraof -S", Gramway- 170R/iripvso flarUmys,
r P Klrrrbdh! 1709 Co -Ts mncy
GL8D, Orodaway - 17091 Eleven Par#tiom, LA, (Tommy Ng), Kimball 11709 Co•
tenancy Jerry Quicksall), agrees to design, construct and imptarnent a swrm drainage
,�,F-� manage ent system providing storm water drainage From thin Northwest comer of CISD
itrin #„ MtddleAntermclialte School property across a drainage casement dawn the west property
line of Greenway -1709 f Elsvan Parbm . LP to 17fl9. Tho system shall be designed
re °' 4.} to dandle the one humdred-year flood runofs of ilhe5e P--ewes, properti'e to the east as
F701 Cr,T&np;Wwail as the runoff from wbadland Height%. TWe systom shall not be designed to ilanrtle
adld,ianat rulwffs fuxn properties ►vest of GF9,art4ay - 1700
1 El"v"I' Pa rtn"rs, LP_ Any
future development or construction to the east or the west of the participating properties
that tastes advantage of tKe system within five years of completion witl owe pro-rata costs
to the parWipAft n1 this agreement (Per City of SOLM12W Ordiiiiince)
CISID, Greenway - 1709 1 Eleven Piartnam, LP and KimhaU ) t709 Co -Tenancy are
resportslble for a percentage of the drair-,age contributed, ay their property, to 11se system.
CtSf}: $182,845, Greenwity - 17091 e16van Partners. iP: $09,6M, Kknball J 1709 Co-
7anancy_ $67,653. The tvtdl oust at Constrwflun and Eraglneerir,g is $390rtt 1. Refer to
AlCach rnent °G'.
GISD issued thti% design documents as a sepiarate c mpetitne sealed proposal to the
pubic. Total Pmgrgirrl Management planed adwaKLsaments for tt1e Proposals and issue
the Proposal package. Proposals were then opaneb, myiewed and seaeotad based on
Me moat qualffiod oontractor. Tne praposalswill qe taken to the Carroll I.S.[]_ School
Board For approwl JQnuary 8". Upon the approval of the Carroll independent School
District Boats of Trustees the oungtrudl oln of dia drainage fadlily will proceed subject tD
the review and approval of the City of Sou tlltake_
Upon agreement of the contractor and the price, an iawrow account will be set up at First
State Bank of Texas, GrapevinoOffiice, Pa7VasseyADcount Manager, for the purpose
of payfng the contractor_ Each a wilt r spansibia for depositing Gast} in an agreed
amount by Jenuarya2G01_
During the canstrLiC13n, each parkyr !me bin pariicimtie in the consirucfion process.
Contraubw pay requasis will ne oopied to all psrties for faAew before approval of
payment.
Upon completion of Be pro1ect the remaining M01110S will stay in place unlit such time that
it is detefmirmel ,hat all work is complete and warranted and all Maims are settled. This
Page)
f/
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 4
agreement is subject W eaeemenl and limitations agreeabde to Oreenvray -1708 f
Eleven Partners. LP and Klmballl f 1709 Cc -Tenancy, providing Kimball J 1709,Co-
Teuaucy access to storm drainage inlprovEsmpnt, Soa Exhihds "A`, 'U", 'Q", and -E}.
S�gfwd and r ffocbl v on the data Iusr sot fora? bofow.
lareenw — 7091 Eleven Partners, LP FQ; vev,-,�-l7 efevLAc
ey: ►
Title; PCt? r de RT r A- + ne- i f + he t �
Address: 2301 Cedar Springs, 5. @ 400, Dallea, Tex&5 75201
county C& Daltas
On - VVIU c u'R, ?J y b9we rre, QVilani Puhllc
personally appehrad U:S;- A;L. IA. !M;�2k— , personally MDw to me (or
proved to me on the basis of sa Wactary evidence) ,a be the Person whose no -me is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknovAedged to me chat he executed the some
in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature an the in%Tu ment, the person, or the
entity upon twhalf of which the person acted, executed th-B instrument.
FNE33 m ant official. seal_ CFIRIGrf J. WN MONS
11&"S71 --Y. l!40)rr,r+-wbr, NotaryPOA0,Swo0iTsmat
NcUry Pubbc r CUMMUap Frp m
01-0�-0d
Illy commission expires:.- M. Y- Eq-- D- -------
-
Kimb� 1 1709 Co-Tenaney '
By_ D, Prea'rd w 47 u. , urki rearr�a., CtYr�erL+fAa a er �,t,
r
Title'
Addreas, 3551 Nprthweal Parkway, Dallas, Texas, 75225
County oi; Daltas
0 a , WoFe nn 1 ry Puldia,
personally appea , person Ily know to m9 (Cif
proved to me on the basis vF 4ati5Factory evkferloo) to ha the parson whasa nama Is
subscribed to the wiithin inshument and aclmow;edged to me that he executed the same
Page 2 of
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 5
In hls authorized capacty, and that by his signature on the instrurnent, the person, ar the
anti u n bah If of he n aeled, executed the instrument.
Nf= my d an i a CNRt$� J. HAMMOTis
/Y4rvw rt/ MGiwvfubk, SaarP ai Tones
fl ry Publit I wtomrwidan Exa-AS
My commissianexpiraa, —7-0 2,
Carroll Independent c oat distrlet
County af: t3e�� I4f{t-
On Q11K • 08 26•` / , befara me. 1aL,— , l".,-Notary Public
persaEally appeared -r - j (. r ) Jam,.,. , personally know to me (or
pouved to me ark the Msis of satisfactory ey denoe) to be tfie person whose name is
subscribed to the wi#hin instrument and aoknnwledged to me that he executed the same
in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument: the person, or the
entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument
WITH ESS my hand andfi official seal.
.1,fA e Ad
fkiMhih FC HOSEA
Notary Public
My aammisjivi gxpirery:k;3;L.
Cato -
Page a of V. w
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 6
2 k
FA
E. SGUTHLAKE OLVD - „
(F M 1709 ) M
t fl
I
k
• }n�
Si�4I1
�G
r�
' Z
CL IOI
4
1
Co
k cF
_
1
M
I
¢
C
rroo
Cl)l�
LL
j
L<U
,�
t
W
CD 0
Cc: Cr
Cr
H
H
LU
0-0
fr
L�'� �y
LJLLJ
CD 06
%T,
k
k
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I �
I �
I
I
I W
ICJ
� ILkj
I
I �
�
�
a+
I ErEFM
cc
� �
I 0 T
guw%W
yFIhr3
I GL1J fA 0
-
* LLI0 Q
P"Io
\W����
4E �#
1 (L 0Lr)
i 0-
12
xL CJCVw
o
I
�
QIF-
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 7
Exhibit `B'
Bciug a.0.552 aues of land in the John & Frmam Survey, Abstract No, 529, City of 5oullhiake,
Tamers} County, Texas and lacing a stxip of land, over, dm)ugh, and across a tract wnvoyad to
Grcca y-1709JElcven Parttu s is vi Iiu i,, 12806, i'_593. (D.R.T.C.T.) and being more
particulariy described as follows:
COiwrT[vi1:NCING at a 5M' iron pin found for the uorthwrst property cwryrr of said Greeuway-
1709EEleven, Partners tract;
THENCE S OV 29' 08" W, along the west prdpertyr line of said Greenway-1709Meven
Fartnars tract} for a dislancc of 22,36 fact to a paint, said paint being the POINT
OF BEGjNNEgC'r,
THENCE S 44° 47' 52" E, for a distance of 28.15 feet to a paint for a cartwz;
THENCE S 000 28' 0$" W, for a distance of286,6G feet to a point fior a corner,
'R9ENCE S 89" 58' 55" W, for a dL5t0 ae of269.66 feet to a paint for, a corner,
THENCE 5 00° 32' 49" W, for a distance of 634.93 feet to a point for a comcr,
THENCE N 890 29' 11" Vd, for a dista� of 2t).00 feet to a point for a earner,
THENM N 00° 32' 49" E, for a distance of 654.74 feet to a faint for a ccmm,,
THENCE N 3T 59' 55" F, for a &tancc of 269,64 fcct to a W3 iron pin found for a comet;
THENCE N OOP 29' 08" E, for a distance of 286, 65 feet 10 the POINT OF B F 1TlR ING,
CM(aini g 4.552 9,cres, more or less.
Q"-2WU07-WLd.
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 8
Petear-mination of Cost Participation for
Off -site Dlrajuagc and Sewer Improvements Exhibit "C"
Total Proposal dyad Engineering Fees
$ 340,186rOO
($321,500 Construction Proposal+ S18,696 f nginmring Fees)
Cost of Sanitary Sewer to the Kimball 11709 Ca-Tcnancy Property
$ 10,075.00
Achud Drainage Proposal Casts and Engineering w10 Sanitary Sewer ftbuvc
$ 330,111-00
Carroll ISD Participalion
$ 150,000-00
Costs after Carroll ISD Par iticpatiaa
$ 1 &0,111. Q0
Area C (w/o 3ciffirs "Tract) in acres
17.9
Cost per Acre
S € 002.07
Greenway - 17091 Eleven partners, l,P - Acrmgo Costs
$ 10,062,07 x 8.1 ae =
S 81,502,74
Kimball} 1709 Co-Tenaracy
$ 10,062.07 x 5.2 ac =
$ 52,322-75
Total of the two Acreage Costs
$ 133,825A9
1Lemajaing Costs (nott< l) $ 180,11 I.UO - $ 133,82.5-49 =
$ 46,285.51
Distribution ofthr remaiping costs (4M Acres total between the three parties)
Carroll ISD
32.5 1 45.8 x $ 46,295-51
$ 32,844.52
Gr way - 1709 / Eleven Partners, LP - Ac�mgc Coats
8.1 J 45.9 x $ 46,285,51 =
$ 8,185,87
i[ imbal] 11709 Iwo-TfflanEy
5.2 1
45,8 x
S
46,285.51
= $
5.755,12
Total of remaining casts
$
46,295,51
A.djusrccl Carroll ISD Casts
$
150,000.00 +
$
32,844.52
S
1€82,844,52
Greenway - 17€19 f 1? lone Partners, LP Costs
5
81,50214 +
S
8,185.97
= S
89,688.E+1
Kimball. 11709 Co-Tenznacy Costs
{note 2)
$ 52,322.75 +
$ %255,12 +
S
10,075.00
= S
67,6:52.87
Total
340,I8b-00
is a ponion ofthn conbjblrong drainage area that is nor part of the Hiroo property avomnrs properties
paling in this aj�mranont. This ree}ul#A iva'Re &rn8icilug Casts" that is didtl7 Cc amongthcthwe pavperly
's as shown akve.
Notre 2
included in the prnpmal isa,l gx"nsion of an 8" dia_ Sanitary $ewer line W the west property Zinc of the KiFnWi f
1709 Co-Tetiawy Pmpuay. The purpose of this extension is to serve the Kimball 11709 CO -Tenancy prnp".
The DMI of the extension is $9.505 Msed on the aontr=oft un it Priori picas the Cos( of err&M-dng to total
L1fl,750 for the exttwr on -
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page 9
Petear-mination of Cost Participation for
Off -site Dlrajuagc and Sewer Improvements Exhibit "C"
Total Proposal dyad Engineering Fees
$ 340,186rOO
($321,500 Construction Proposal+ S18,696 f nginmring Fees)
Cost of Sanitary Sewer to the Kimball 11709 Ca-Tcnancy Property
$ 10,075.00
Achud Drainage Proposal Casts and Engineering w10 Sanitary Sewer ftbuvc
$ 330,111-00
Carroll ISD Participalion
$ 150,000-00
Costs after Carroll ISD Par iticpatiaa
$ 1 &0,111. Q0
Area C (w/o 3ciffirs "Tract) in acres
17.9
Cost per Acre
S € 002.07
Greenway - 17091 Eleven partners, l,P - Acrmgo Costs
$ 10,062,07 x 8.1 ae =
S 81,502,74
Kimball} 1709 Co-Tenaracy
$ 10,062.07 x 5.2 ac =
$ 52,322-75
Total of the two Acreage Costs
$ 133,825A9
1Lemajaing Costs (nott< l) $ 180,11 I.UO - $ 133,82.5-49 =
$ 46,285.51
Distribution ofthr remaiping costs (4M Acres total between the three parties)
Carroll ISD
32.5 1 45.8 x $ 46,295-51
$ 32,844.52
Gr way - 1709 / Eleven Partners, LP - Ac�mgc Coats
8.1 J 45.9 x $ 46,285,51 =
$ 8,185,87
i[ imbal] 11709 Iwo-TfflanEy
5.2 1
45,8 x
S
46,285.51
= $
5.755,12
Total of remaining casts
$
46,295,51
A.djusrccl Carroll ISD Casts
$
150,000.00 +
$
32,844.52
S
1€82,844,52
Greenway - 17€19 f 1? lone Partners, LP Costs
5
81,50214 +
S
8,185.97
= S
89,688.E+1
Kimball. 11709 Co-Tenznacy Costs
{note 2)
$ 52,322.75 +
$ %255,12 +
S
10,075.00
= S
67,6:52.87
Total
340,I8b-00
is a ponion ofthn conbjblrong drainage area that is nor part of the Hiroo property avomnrs properties
paling in this aj�mranont. This ree}ul#A iva'Re &rn8icilug Casts" that is didtl7 Cc amongthcthwe pavperly
's as shown akve.
Notre 2
included in the prnpmal isa,l gx"nsion of an 8" dia_ Sanitary $ewer line W the west property Zinc of the KiFnWi f
1709 Co-Tetiawy Pmpuay. The purpose of this extension is to serve the Kimball 11709 CO -Tenancy prnp".
The DMI of the extension is $9.505 Msed on the aontr=oft un it Priori picas the Cos( of err&M-dng to total
L1fl,750 for the exttwr on -
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page10
Thence: South 01 degraes L t min. West, with dia West line of said1448 acre h=1, passing [lie
Surdltwost rumor of said 3 d148 t trnu, and continuing wish Cho Wort lilt! of a 3 "m tract of land
conveyed co JJL Egell and wife, S-N- >,3:,e!. , by deed recorded in Volume 76S I, Pagn 864, D" Rmords
Tatraot Oounly, Texas, a total disrtance a P 967.d5 Seat to a paint in the North line of a 12.00 a= tract of
]and wnveyad to Miehael laoobs by dead recorded in VolWna7ISO, Pega P351, Deed Records Tarrant
County. Twcns, a " ia#$t non rod found lifr corner,
Thanna_ North RA degree! 54 min_ Weak with the Xw6 tine of lacaba tract, a distance af4ti4.83 f6et, a 14
inck-rod sel for carnu;
Thencc: NoQtb 03 dcgrers I I min. East with di6 E dt Be of a 11.3429 awe tract of land
caoveyai tv Fi rax Nal ional Bm k of Orapcvhm by deed recomkd In Volume 10912, P%e 2G3 S, Deed
RcmAt Tutttrl County, Texas, a dislarxt 0970-4)1 feef tt« a paint in the said South thn of Sonthl;sbc
Boulevard a YS inoh iron rod found for corn-r;
Thence- South 89 degrees 14 t151n. 32 sec_ East, with the said South line of Sauthiake Boulevardr a
dist.me of 324.55 feet to [he beginn Inb of a cprve to the right; having a ecaum] angle aPO4 dogreea 21 min.
36 sec_, a radius of 184<t_8G feet, a VS inch hart rod found for ranter-,
Thence: Fa mft with mid eru vo Ca the rigs !cone being A ith She said $fali6 line of South lake
Boulevard, an art; disImm of 140.39 feet to the PLACE OF SECM N(3 rW CONTAINING 411 A87
syuaro feel or 10.3601 arras of I41ud,
aP VV✓
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page11
*1411r-111� m
Subject to any required gavernmenml or municipal authorities approval. Carroll
Inavpeodent School District &Im1 i prvv ide and not apprrse aacesfi to tho muca or dljvm
mnaecdng the existing drive (to be corLATUMed by trthera) along the nw h boundary of
the Carroll Independent School District's MWdlel nlumediate school property from the
described Kirab I-1709 Co -Tenancy and Greenway-J 709fElevett Partners L.P_
properties. Cirmll ISD waald require ndjaeenLdevelepments to get their approval for
A,c canfigumtian of tho portion oftho road or driven which fall ou Sdicol District
property befbm bryginning work.
M
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page12
Front: Martha Taylor
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 7:16 PM
To: mayor(�—ci.Sauthlake.tx.us
Subject: Village Center Alignment
Enclosed is a letter xith comments on the proposed Village Center Realignment on the agenda for Feb. 5 Council meeting.
Thank You
1vlartha Taylor
Dear Mayor and City Council Members'.
My husband and I are requesting that city council take action to move the
proposed alignment of Village Center Road from 1 S to the more desirable 1 N
alignment.
T,aeenty-five years ago when we moved to Southlake this property was zoned
agriculture for the Zembrod Horse Farm. Zoning and land use were changed to
support the office category and church (Community Service). We supported this
changeaswe feltthisfitwellwiththe residentialneighborh00d. Now we are
threatened vvith a road intended for heavy commercial use only a feet+ feet from
our yard. Cur property is at the right angle bend of the road in the Sf alignment
and vehicles will eventually end up in our backyard. We will have the constant
annoyance of headlights and noise fromtraffic disrupting ou€tranquility. The
church has proposed using the property for a Bible College butwe don:t know
whatthe future holds. If it eventually is zoned as commercial property the 1 N
alignmentwould provide a buffer between residential and commercial and
provide space for other buildings alongthe shared fence.
Movingthe road to the north does not changethe original intentionof the road,
an alternate route to Kimball Rd. andthe schools. andwould be beneficial to
everyone. Our neighborhood would have a buffer and the city would not be
obligated to provide an expensive masonry fence. H i storically that type fence
has been provided to every other residential neighborhood with this situation.
Also, it would soften the road and encourage drivers to use the road as intended.
It would seem that P and Z did not considerthe letterwe provided expressing our
concerns. rill they could ask was whywe were not there. This was the same
evening thatthe issue concerning the lights at the Carroll High School was
presented and the meeting ran very late and we were notable to stay to present
our case. We are disappointedthat P and did not listen t0 our concerns and
are requesting City Council choose the 1 N option.
Please consider making this slight adjustment on the road alignment as this has
a huge impact on the future of our neighborhood.
Thankyou,
Martha T. Tayfor
John _ Taylor
Ord. No. Attachment F
1056 Page13
C�lNI]Iki/e1�[���[��i[�)~7�
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,
FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED MOBILITY AND MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP TO INDICATE THE GENERAL ALIGNMENT OF
SOUTH VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE GENERALLY EXTENDING FROM EAST
SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) to SOUTH NOLEN DRIVE AND TO
BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL..
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local
Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter provides for the adoption and updating of a
Comprehensive Master Plan and its components, including the Master Thoroughfare Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded a recommendation foran amendment
to the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1
Pursuant to Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter, the Comprehensive Master Plan, of which the
Master Thoroughfare Plan is a component, may be submitted in whole or in part from time to time to the
Council for their adoption, accompanied by a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and
shall contain a planning consideration for a period of at least ten (10) years. The proposed amendments to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan, noted by graphical depiction in Exhibit "A" and attached hereto, is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
• Design as a 60' foot (C2U) collector roadway with a speed limit not to exceed 30
mph.
• Design as an "Urban" cross-section roadway which includes curb gutters, street
trees and sidewalks.
• Traffic calming measures should be considered in the design of the roadway.
• At the time the roadway connection to Kimball Avenue is made from the west,
the CISD's north drive connection to Kimball Avenue shall be closed and the
western most school service drive shall be connected to the new roadway.
• Intersection improvements such as pedestrian crosswalks should be considered
at the following locations: 1) the two-way intersection located at the southwest
Ord. No. Attachment G
1056 Page
corner of the Gateway Church property; 2) the intersection at Southwood Drive;
3) the three-way intersection located at the corners of the
Greenway/Quicksall/CISD properties; 4) the intersection of the school's west
drive; and 5) the intersection of S. Kimball Avenue and S. Village Center Drive.
• The northern boundary of the CISD property should be fenced to minimize
potential vehicle/pedestrian conflict.
• During design of the roadway, mitigation measures of the new roadway on
adjacent residential properties such as landscaping, buffering, fencing and
screening shall be considered.
• The portion of the roadway near the intersection of the CISD school drive shall
be designed with a center turn lane in both directions to allow stacking to occur
during school drop of and pick up times.
l;�ME" IEel kil W.,
The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City
Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake,
along with a copy of the minute order of the Council so adopting or approving same. Any existing element of
the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full
force and effect until amended by the City Council as provided herein.
SECTION 3
This ordinance shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 5th day of February, 2013.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 19th day of February, 2013.
MAYOR John Terrell
ATTEST:
Ord. No. Attachment G
1056 Page 2
CITY SECRETARY
/_1NINIde1y/2101_M•2Mel 21i1VMAW_1►1Dan xeL14Ira
CITY ATTORNEY
Ord. No.
1056
Attachment G
Page 3