2013-01-28 Meeting Report (Ridgeview South)
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
N/A Formal application pending
PROJECT NAME:
Ridgeview South
SPIN DISTRICT:
SPIN # 10
MEETING DATE:
January 28, 2013; 7:00 PM
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3A 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Fourteen (14)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Monique Schill # 11, Vic Awtry # 7
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Tom Matthews and Curtis Young
STAFF PRESENT:
Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT:
Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I: (817)748-8069 or lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at 605 Davis Boulevard.
Development Details
Proposing 41 lots on approximately 18.79 acres
Development proposed to be consistent with the approved Ridgeview development to
the north and include a sidewalk connection
Large detention pond at the SE corner
Presented at SPIN:
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
Will there be a masonry wall along the south side?
There is one that exists and a mix of wood and brick
Î
The fencing is existing; we will have to take a look and give it some thought. We
Î
are planning a landscape buffer, however, we may need to supplement any
gaps.
Who will maintain fencing and common areas?
There will be an HOA established that will provide maintenance.
Î
Are there going to be turn lanes on Davis?
Î
Will the homes all be two story?
Most probably but some might be single story.
Î
How big are the homes?
2500 to 4500 square feet
Î
How many homes per acre?
Approximately 2,01 or 2.04
Î
When will construction start?
This development is still being engineered; we hope to start the approved portion
Î
to the north in the next 60 days. Ridgeview South may start in June and be
completed late Summer.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.