Item 6D, 6E and 6F` SOUTHLAKE
CP12-006, ZA12-099, ZA12-112
Owners: Marguerite E. Fechtel Revocable Trust, Rita E. Fechtel Trust,
Merton and Susan M. Skaggs, Ride With Pride, Inc., James and
Joy Duggins, Stephen A. Davis
Applicant: Terra Land Management, Inc.
Requests: 1) Approval of a Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential
2) Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from
"AG" Agricultural District and "SF-1B" Single Family Residential
District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
District for Highland Oaks, a subdivision with 27 residential lots
and 5 open space lots on approximately 16.34 acres
3) Approval of a Preliminary Plat
Location: Generally located west of N. White Chapel Blvd. and north of W.
Highland St,
Future Land Use
Highland Oaks
Land Use Designation:
Low Density Residential
Ilk
Future Land Use Update - 2012
LU_TYPE
100-Year Flood Plain
Corps of Engineers Property
�Y s�or= cT
Public PaWOpen Space
PubliGS=Pablic
Low Density Residential
a Medium Density Residential
office Commercial
Retail Commercial
Mixed Use
-
Town Center
Regional Retail
Industnal
0 M 4M 9b
Feel
r 4 I I,
1
i_..�
L_l
El
DOVE CREEK TRL
1
Zoning
AG: Agricultural District
Highland Oaks
SF-16: Single Family
Residential District
Q AG MCI
® RE M C2
Q SF1A - C3
E3 SF1B - C4
H
® SF2 M NR-PUD
- SF30 M HC
SF20A 77181
Q SF208 Q B2
- R-PUD 11
- MF1 - 12
® MF2 Q SP1
- MH Q SP2
Q CS M DT
01 TZD
W
A(GHI
AND
iT
0 02 Q ECZ
i 1
i
i
CSIFE WHITE
CHAPELHWEL OFFICE PARK Vw
' GRACE C01.1RRl NI TY CHNACH
Ilk
1
i AIIT NIN CREEK
SCMIHLAKE ASSSSEMBLY
It CHURCH
72
t. SI
m
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the
City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it
pertains to the "SF-20A" Single -Family Residential zoning district and the City of
Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following
exceptions:
Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than fifteen thousand
(15,000) square feet.
Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty (30)
feet.
Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet,
twenty (20) feet for side yards facing a street.
Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of twenty-five (25) feet.
Front, Side and Rear Yards for Lot 11, Block 1 shall be as shown and
dimensioned on the Development Pian.
Lot Width/ Depth:
All lots shall meet the lot width and depth requirements of the
"SF-20A" district (100'), except Lot 11, Block 1, which shall be as
shown on the Development Plan.
Lot widths shall be measured at the Front Yard setback line for
each lot as indicated on the Zoning Development Plan.
Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not
exceeding forty percent (40%) of the lot area, except the sum
total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet.
Minimum House Size: All houses shall be a minimum of 3.500 s.f. in floor area.
9
A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along the internal street
frontage of all Residential Lots. Sidewalks and trails within the Open Space Lots
shall be as shown on the Zoning Development Plan and Pedestrian Access Plan.
Streets shall have a 40' R-O-W, with 30' of paving.
Buffer lots: Lots adjacent to property or existing lots that are: currently zoned,
platted as one acre lots, or on the Future Land Use Plan designated
for one acre or larger lots, or zoned and platted as SF-1 or RE
shall:
1. Have a minimum area of 20,000 s.f., and
2. Have a minimum lot dimension of 95'.
10
Site Data Summary Chart
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Number
Gross
Net
Densily-
Open
Open
Land use
Zoning
Zoning
of Lots
Acreage
Acreage
DUI Gross
Space
Spam
Acre
Acreage
Areal %
AG&SFIB
RPIJ1)
27
16.34Ac.
16.104c-
1.65
1 3.11
19,03%
Legena
4: Q�CrKt We"k
6 cancreteTrall
0--n Op. Sip—
Rzidential Lot
R.O.W, Ddl.d-
0-
14 9
12
IT
11
13 i 14 L5 16 I,
17 19 1 20 21
15.012 r X.f. r' �'G�f 13,777 s.f
L ------
L L ------ J L L ------
7T
7
16,903 x.I.
-----------
1 F 4 k
3 11 24K r:
20.4" BLMKI
M4 x.f
8' Iron with Wood Inserts
6' Iron with Optional Wood Inserts
6' Masonry Wall
12
Legend
4'Cxcrete Sid—k -----•- -
GCwcreteTmd .....
Estimated 7r to be Saved —
Esbmated Trees to be PMI* SNW —
k'R EAimatedT—t. be Rvnmed -
--
Slopes greater than 5% —
��
13
rv.r sraec[c
I6
"m`--25 L
AL..�.�.
.,.,..
�Y �e
��� �.w�,mnn �wm •.w �w.niee � � _ � _.�.. 5
14
� �
I
I'
II
III
I:
11ira.m
I I
P
III _
III -
pli:
-- _ - ------
-- _ -L s -_I ---'-��'
u I L—d
---
I
-I-
P I` J _ Y f I I I ---TWC 2— E 1.
L_ —J
MM
� II
15
16
C P 12-006
Planning and Zoning Commission:
• November 8, 2012; Recommended Approval (7-0) subject to
the staff report dated November 2, 2012 and noting the
applicant's willingness to make the design guidelines part
of the zoning application as it moves forward to City
Council.
City Council:
• December 4, 2012; Motion to table to the January 15, 2013
meeting was approved (7-0).
• January 15, 2013; Approved at 1st reading (5-2) subject to
the staff report dated January 9, 2013.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated October 12, 2012 and noting the staff report of the
same date.
17
ZA12-099
Planning and Zoning Commission:
• November 8, 2012; Recommended Approval (7-0) subject to the
Development Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 2, 2012 noting
the staff report dated November 2, 2012 and noting the applicant's
willingness to include the design guidelines as part of the application as it
goes to Council so that it can be part of the zoning request.
City Council:
• December 4, 2012; Motion to table to the January 15. 2013 meeting was
approved (7-0)
• January 15, 2013: Approved at 15t reading (7-0) subject to Development
Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 9, 2013 and the applicant
providing exhibit "A" known as the Highland Oaks design guidelines dated
December 12th.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated October 12, 2012 and noting the staff report of the
same date.
ZA12-112
Planning and Zoning Commission:
• November 8, 2012; Recommended Approval (7-0) subject to
the Development Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated
November 2, 2012 noting the staff report dated November 2,
2012 and noting the applicant's willingness to include the
design guidelines as part of the application as it goes to
Council so that it can be part of the zoning request.
City Council:
• December 4, 2012; Motion to table to the January 15, 2013
meeting was approved (7-0)
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated October 12, 2012 and noting the staff report of the
same date.
19
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
20
Site Data Summary Chart
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Number
Gross
Net
Open
Land use
Zoning
Zoning
of Lots
Acreage
Acreage
Space
alt
Area/
9n
G & SF1B
RPUD
27
16.34 AC.
16.10 Ac.15,00%
Legend
4' Concrete Sideool& ---------
WConcreterrail ......
Cammon Open Spare
Residential Lots
R.O.W. Ded'Iradon
10
1if �BAO'. 150
s • I -
s
J
IN 551 .f
s I i
a�J' .I �SJSft r s§ol r-
1, g _
4
�oo __j
�-
21
- - - - - - - - - - -
I rti,2
NI 21
i,2-s.
12
----------
II Ji 10 I
9
------ 1:71
W21"ivy
OPEN SPACE INCREASED FROM 15% TO 19.03%
22
23
24
25
L-------
I F - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
L- - - - - - - - - -
"4 z.1 20,433 ..r.
8' Iron with Wood Inserts
6' Iron with Optional Wood Inserts
6' Masonry Wall
16m, f m I'Mx F
If.
ism,.r. 15.D81
-Oc-
- - - - - - - - - -
20321sf it 20.015 s.f.
.......... ..
26
Tree Canopy Coverage
Total site area 711,986 s.f.
Total e>dsdng canopy ai7g,532 s.f. --a 25.22%
Preserved tree canopy
Preserved tree canopy (green) = 102,684 s.f. •-> 57.20%
Possible Preserved tree canopy (yellow) - 19,916 s.r.--> 11.09%
122,600 s.f. --> 68.29%
27
II �
Ili
�.
II
li:
II
II:
11•_
I
II lI
I
-71
I
---
I
ti f
LUF-
l� --- ~ �`
C�D
..�.,�. -
---------------
F
.. i--
���
29
Tree CdngW Ca✓erage
ittdl6iGkq fdl0p/ =136,934 s.f.f 3139%'_ �1
vr�v tl�rd�wif�l s2�ss 5.t->a9.u9t - -�.
nmLtle PYaa�e44®m Vl ll�m�) a I8,573 63.71% r: ••�w
Legend it �'
T perartR SidmlX--••••• � lba5 � � 1---.�
Ez mxa Treeseoe l+pi9tle seaea � '�. - � ��- E
Ek nvteJsrees to p<Reno[e1 li'i �� Q I � "ie __ _
Sbves oeaeo 11�n 514 111 �— � �
ki jl
Fence Legeatl
6 F9PxN m35mM1 wa '
b ,im tnmwl w[ma waaE YeaO I F-_ —�
Ifun van) le
Scekreesw be Ae:emltvl tl/1M1s
tliscreum W [ne wmarty umee �1,
Note:
fi Cmuett Teal e,m9 w9tla[tl vnRcehNE [o[aM0 (o sarc Yrces. .. -
30
Site Data Summary Chart
Ekliaap
Eklr6na
erpPv.'C
NPm
Grow
Net
Deiwas.
ripen
been
LaM use
—119
2 MD
I
at Lob
I
An W
DW Gross
Space
Span
Aue Awea9e +u�I% wwuvu.wvi w+ � )y�.. I' .a.sxri.wuaws. as. .
AG PPUD 15 926 ac 9.07 P[. Ib2
r_____ r 61AC.
jL5,383 ar, 15,009 s.f. �'"7 �J�o 1 s.E Ili ISAB c, f. I. 9 Aw1.wR m.amafrw
Legend
9' Cwcrete
Common Open Space
Resltlenbal lDts I
0 a
P.O.w. llediretion I zD.osz s.r' �� 16,45±.:. �✓
Fence Legend
W�
6 Pmposetl mm rywall
os9 I5,Wl_r.L
6'Imnnew!wood Peerls(EAm Park} I 2o,D1a f-
6'1.. fence w( o*wal wood inseRs-
(Bte5 Park) -
Side fences will be determined by the
discretic, or the properly owncn SI 2 3 d
sl 2p.019 s.r. �' 20,%A>f� iivU±y.r
I
31