Loading...
1995-03-07CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 7, 1995 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Gary Fickes; Mayor Pro Tern Jerry Farrier; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Jon Michael Franks. Members: W. Ralph Evans, Andy Wambsganss, and Michael Richarme. COUNC1LMEMBER ABSENT: Stephen Apple CITY STAFF PRESENT: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager; Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager; LouAnn Heath, Director of Finance; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Ron Harper, City Engineer; Tom Elgin, City Planner; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; E. Allen Taylor Jr., City Attorney; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. WORK SESSION: The work session began at 6:30 p.m. whereby Councilmembers and City staff reviewed all agenda items for tonight's meeting. INVOCATION: Councilmember W. Ralph Evans. The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Gary Fiekes. Aeenda Item g2-A. Executive Session Mayor Fickes advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071,551.072, 551.074, 551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advise of the City Attorney with respect to pending and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and to consider the appointment and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devises. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:01 p.m. Council returned to open session at 8:15 p.m. Agenda Item #2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session No action was necessary as the result of the executive session. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page two Agenda Item #3, Approval of the Minutes of February 14. and February 21. 1995 The minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on February 21, 1995 and the Special City Council meeting held on February 14, 1995, were approved as presented. Motion: Wambsganss Second: Richarme Ayes: Wambsganss, Richarme, Evans, Farrier, Franks, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Councilmembers Wambsganss and Franks abstained from voting on the February 14, Special meeting minutes and Mayor Fickes abstained from voting on the February 21, 1995 Regular meeting minutes. Aeenda Item #4-A. Mayor's Renort Mayor Gary Fickes announced important information with regards to the May 6, 1995 General Election, noting filing for office began on February 20, 1995 and will end on March 22, 1995. Early voting will begin on April 17, and end on May 2, 1995. The last day to register to vote in the General Election is April 6, 1995. Agenda Item #4-B. City Manager's Renort No comments were made by the City Manager during this time. Agenda Item #4-C. SPIN Report No comments were made by the Assistant City Manager during this time. Aeenda Item #5. Consent Agenda The Consent agenda consisted of the following items: 5-A. Authorizing the immediate demolition of a portion of the building located at Lot 18, Block 1, West Beach Addition. 5-B. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with a consultant for Economic Development Strategic Plan. 5-C. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Cheatham and Associates for design of S-7, Phase I, Sewer Line. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page three A~,enda Item//5. Continued 5-D. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a renewal agreement between the City of Southlake and Fort Worth Star-Telegram, as the City's official legal publication. 5-E. Award of bid for Paving and Drainage Project, Phase I, White Chapel Blvd., from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114. 5-F. Award of bid for Paving and Drainage Project, Phase II, White Chapel Blvd., from Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709. 5-G. Approval of Change Order #2 for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda, removing items #5-A, #5-F, and #5-G and considering them separately. Motion: Wambsganss Second: Franks Ayes: Wambsganss, Franks, Farrier, Richarme, Evans, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #5-A was removed from the agenda A~enda Item//5-F. Contract Award for White Chanel Pavinm Phase H Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, explained the low bidder was Reynolds Asphalt and Construction Company, however, a bid bond was not presented. Mr. Whitehead commented, if this project were bid again it would mean approximately a one month delay. Mayor Fickes commented the Council does have the option of approving the bid or rejecting the bid and going back out for bids again. Councilmember Richarme stated it would make sense, given Council just approved Phase I on the consent agenda, and all of South White Chapel Blvd. would not be under construction at the same time. Also, the remaining bids were above the engineering estimate. The one bid under the engineering estimate did not have the bid bond. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page four Agenda Item #5-F. Continued Motion was made to reject all bids for White Chapel Paving, Phase II, from Bear Creek to F.M. 1709 and give permission to re-advertise for bids for this project. Motion: Farrier Second: Richarme Ayes: Farrier, Richarme, Franks, Evans, Wambsganss, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #5-G. Chance Order #2. Bicentennial Park Exoansion. Phase I Motion was made to approve Change Order #2 for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I, as approved by the Southlake Park Development Corporation, deleting $12,060. for solid sod bermuda grass at this time. Motion: Farrier Second: Richarme Ayes: Farrier, Richarme, Evans, Wambsganss, Franks, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CONSENT ITEMS Southlake Building Board of Appeals has ordered the building located at Lot 18, Block 1, Bass Drive to be removed or demolished within 30 days. Staff recommends that the Council authorize the removal of the dangerous part of the structure (chimney) at the expense of the City, on behalf of the owner and assess the removal expenses on the property on which the structure is located. However, this item was removed from the agenda as the chimney had been removed at the time of Council meeting. Select consultant for Economic Development Strategic Plan. Three proposals have been submitted in response to the RFP mailed mid-December, 1994. Based on review of the Economic Development Advisors, it was recommended the selection of PHH Fantus Consulting as the professional consulting firm providing assistance with the preparation of the City of Southlake's Economic Development Strategic Plan. The fee for the project is $24,750. In addition, they request reimbursement for out-of-pocket travel expenses, cost of computer usage, communication services, package delivery, graphic costs, and reproduction costs. These various expenses are billed without mark-up and will not exceed 10% of the project cost. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page five Agenda Item//5. Continued Proposal for Professional Services in connection with the design of S-7 Sewer Line, Section I by Cheatham and Associates. As noted in the proposal, the total fee for Professional Services for this project will be $70,000. Renewal Contract with the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as the legal publication for the City. Contract to begin on March 1, 1995 to expire on February 28, 1996. Current rates for legal notices is included in the contract. In 1989, the City passed a Resolution naming the FOg Worth Star-Telegram as the legal publication, as a requirement of the Home Rule Charter. Contract Award for White Chapel Paving, Phase I, from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114. The base bid consists of pavement repair and a 2-inch asphalt overlay. This will result in a total pavement thickness in this area of 4-inches. The engineer's estimate for this project was $355,370. Staff recommends that the award of the Base Bid and Alternate A in the amount of $334,020. to Sunmount Corporation be awarded. Sunmount Corporation has performed for the City in the past, and has done satisfactory work. Contract Award for White Chapel Paving, Phase II, from Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709. The low bidder was Reynolds Asphalt and Construction in the amount of $223,438.50, however, the bid bond was not available, therefore Council voted to reject all bids and to rebid as soon as possible, realizing only one month will be lost due to this action. The Southlake Park Development Corporation voted earlier this evening to approve the Change Order g2, for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I, subject to removing the addition to furnish and place solid sod bermuda grassed infield areas on fields 4,5,6, & 7, for a cost of $12,060. The total amount of the change order is $22,017. Aeenda Item//6. Public Forum No comments were received during the public forum. Agenda Item #8-A, Ordinance No. 480-160. 1st readlne (ZA 95-01). Ordinance No. 480-160, 1st reading ZA 95-01, Rezoning for 9.494 acres situated in the H. Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 1H. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: William Casner; Applicants: Linda Martin and Tim Piatt. SPIN Neighborhood #14. ,-.. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that ten (10) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 Page six Agenda Item #8-A. Continued Tim Piatt, applicant, was present for the meeting to answer questions for Council. Mr. Piatt explained to Council looped driveways will be built to comply with the Fire Code requirements. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-160, 1st reading, as requested. Motion: Richarme Second: Wambsganss Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Richarme, Wambsganss, Evans, Farrier, Franks, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #8-B, ZA 95-13, Preliminary Plat of Burns/Grubbs Addition. Preliminary Plat for Burns/Grubbs Addition, being 9.494 acres situated in the H. Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract iH. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: William Casner; Applicants: Linda Martin and Timothy Platt. SPIN Neighborhood//14. The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, commented that ten (10) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and three written responses have been received from within the 200' notification area, including: William E. LaFavers, has no problem with the positions of the houses. He does have a problem with the shed which rains the view from his living room- the shed was not approved when built; Mark Struhs, in favor, however, if the plans should change, further consideration by all affected parties should be given before the request is approved; Ken and Gloria Land, in favor. Councilmember Richarme asked staff if the Planning and Zoning Commission stipulated the four conditions listed here; drive to the front and rear lot which fire services feels is adequate; emergency access easement loop; knox box fire access gates; and the rear turn-around lot. Have those been incorporated into plan? Greg Last stated those items should not be made a part of the motion as they are not items listed in the subdivision ordinance. Councilmember Wambsganss noted the zoning approved tonight is less intense than the zoning shown on the Land Use Category. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page seven Aeenda Item g8-B. Continued Motion was made to approve ZA 95-13, Preliminary Plat for Bums/Grubbs Addition, subject to the second Plat Review Summary dated March 3, 1995, deleting item gl. Motion: Richarme Second: Franks Ayes: Richarme, Franks, Farrier, Wambsganss, Evans, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Aeenda Item g8-c. Ordinance No. 480-164, 1st reading ZA 95-02 Ordinance No. 480-164, 1st reading (ZA 95-02), Rezoning for 16.63 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tract 2C. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: Peggy H. Denton; Applicant: H. Creek Development. SPIN Neighborhood g3. At the request of the applicant, motion was made to table this item until the April 4, 1995 City Council Meeting. Motion: Richarme Second: Farrier Ayes: Richarme, Farrier, Franks, Wambsganss, Evans, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote (to table) Aeenda Item g8-D. Ordinance No. 480-165. 1st readine (ZA 95-09) Ordinance No. 480-165, 1st reading (ZA 95-09), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood I, being 18.03 acres situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, Tract 7C. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: Royal E. Smith, Jr; Applicant: PIMAProperties, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #16. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that twenty-two (22) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and eight written responses have been received from within the 200' notification area: Daphine Johnson, in favor; Royal and Marilyn Smith (Owners), in favor; Mary Ausley, opposed; Ladis Pokluda, in favor; Robert A. Jordan, undecided; Carl R. Wilson, undecided; Robert Edmondson, in favor; Marc and Becky Summey, in favor. One written response received from outside the 200' notification area from: Alleane N. Johnston, opposed. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page eight Agenda Item #8-D, Continued Councilmember Richarme commented on the trail system access, asking staff if they are ready to discuss the alternatives with Council. Greg Last, Director of Community Development replied the review letter recommended the stub to tie into the private road that runs to the north. Mr. McMahan suggested that he was going to put a piece of property under contract to better provide access through the water tower site. David McMahan, PIMA Properties, commented he will look for access to the north/east, but he does not want to take out trees to give access. Councilmember Farrier stated he would like the easement to tie onto lohnson Road if possible. Karen Gandy stated she also received a letter from Ms. Osley, stating the lights from the proposed street will shine on her bedroom windows, and that concerns her. David McMahan commented Ms. Osley is mistaken on the location of her property. He explained the location on her house and located it on an aerial transparency for Council. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-165, 1st reading, subject to the second Plan Review Summary dated March 3, 1995, with the developer working with staff to determine the best location for the trail system. Motion: Richarme Second: Wambsganss Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance Ayes: Richarme, Wambsganss, Evans, Franks, Farrier, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #8-E. Ordinance No. 480-166, 1st readine (ZA 95-10) Ordinance No. 480-166, 1st reading (ZA 95-10), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood II, being 13.15 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tract 1. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: Royal E. Smith, Jr.; Applicant: PIMA Properties, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #16. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page nine Agenda Item #8-E, Continued Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that the applicant requested this item be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission the second meeting in April in order to him to have more time to work on the plan, as there will be major changes in the plan, including size of lots in the addition. Motion was made to send ZA 95-10 back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for the 2nd meeting in April, as requested by the applicant. Motion: Wamabsganss Second: Evans Ayes: Wambsganss, Evans, Franks, Farrier, Richarme, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote A~,enda Item #8-F. ZA 95-11. Revised Develonment Plan for Timarron Addition ZA 95-11, Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B, (formerly known as Phase III, Product Type D), being 10.4 acres of the previous Product D area and an additional 38 acres for a total proposed of 48.072 acres situated in the Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797 and the M.W. Davenport Survey, Abstract No. 432. The Development includes 170 single-family residential lots. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #9. The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, stated three (3) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. The applicant has met ail the review comments of the first Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plan Review Summary dated March 3, 1995. Steve Yetts applicant with Timarron Land Development Corporation, was present for the meeting to answer questions for Council. Councilmember Richarme commented about when Timarron first came in and introduced the "Golf Villas". Now we are talking about four (4) times as many dwellings. The density will now be 3.54 units per acre. A discussion was held regarding the streets within the development, and whether or nor they will withstand the additional traffic on the streets. Councilmember Wambsganss addressed the situation that exists on the streets within the Timarron Addition, and said it is not acceptable. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page ten Agenda item #8-F. Continued Councilmember Evans stated when the first concepts came out on Timarron, there was a great amount of discussion that was held regarding the smaller lots. At that time it was a much smaller number of lots. Evans stated he recalls it was about thirty-forty of these houses. That did not bother him at that particular time, but now we see this number, with another one or two of these Villas coming in. He feels they will come back in and ask for rezoning to something other than PUD. Evans also commented on the small lots with traffic and there being no way in and out. Having a gated area would make it worse. Motion was made to approve ZA 95-11, Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B, subject to the second Plat Review Summary dated March 3, 1995, and that the development regulations approved in May 1992 be carried through to this development. Motion: Franks Second: Wambsganss Ayes: Franks, Wambsganss, Farrier, Fickes Nays: Richarme, Evans Approved: 4-2 vote Council adjourned for recess at 10:15 p.m. Council returned to open session at 10:25 p.m. Agenda Item #8-G. ZA 95-12. Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition. Golf Villas A and B ZA 95-12, Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B, (formerly known as Phase III, Product Type D), being 10.4 acres of the previous Product D area and an additional 38 acres for a total proposed of 48.072 acres situated in the Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797 and the M.W. Davenport Survey, Abstract No. 432. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that three (3) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Steve Yetts, Timarron Land Corporation, commented he wants to proceed with this plat even though it may change the number of lots. Yetts indicated he has no concerns with the second Plat Review Summary dated March 3, 1995. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page eleven Aeenda Item #8-G. Continued Motion was made to approve ZA 95-12, subject to the second Plat Review Summary dated March 3, 1995, changing the development regulations to match those approved in May, 1992. Motion: Farrier Second: Franks Ayes: Farrier, Franks, Wambsganss, Fickes Nays: Richarme and Evans Approved: 4-2 vote A~,enda Item #11-A. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 to include a full-service car wash. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated since this issue came before Council last, she stated she contacted other area cities about their ordinances and have found that her earlier recommendation to permit this use in the "C-3" General Commercial DisLrict with a Specific Use Permit ("SUP") is appropriate. This procedure would require submittal of a Concept Plan with each request. The ordinance could also be drafted requiring a Site Plan rather than a Concept Plan which would afford the Commission and the Council an opportunity to review a more detailed plan prior to approval of such a request. Ms. Gandy also recommended that the following items be conditions for SUP approval: l) sanitary sewer be available to the site, 2) location be on a major arterial to insure proper traffic circulation, 3) minimum of ten (10) stacking spaces, 4) a minimum of one parking space per 200 s.f. of total floor area of all buildings, and 5) the wash bay and vacuum/gasoline pump areas be 45 degrees off parallel to the adjoining thoroughfare. Dr. Gene Wright, DVM, 1369 Knox Road, Keller. Dr. Wright stated he has owned the property where he would like to put a car wash for twenty (20) years. He asked Council to consider an amendment to the ordinance to allow for this use. Councilmember Richarme commented, since this issue came up before, he has seen a full spectrum of car washes. He is sensitive because the City allowed the same type facility. Mayor Fickes stated in the corridor study, this type use was placed in the category with automobile repair, lube shops, etc. Council asked to have this item sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission for an amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow for an "S-U-P" in the "C-3" Zoning District for a car-wash. This should go before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the first meeting in April. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page twelve A~,enda Item #8-H. Ordinance No. 506-A. 1st reading, amendine the Sion Ordinance The City Manager, commented that Greg Last, Director of Community Development, has included in the packet the redline/strikeout version #6 of the sign ordinance, which includes the recommendation of the Council at prior meetings. Greg Last reviewed the ordinance with the Council on a section by section bases, making changes throughout the ordinance. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 506-A, 1st reading, with the changes as discussed tonight. Motion: Wambsganss Second: Evans Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Wambsganss, Evans, Farrier, Richarme, Fickes Nays: Franks Approved: 5-1 vote Aeenda Item #8-I. Ordinance No. 635, 1st readine. Code of Ethics and Conduct Curtis Hawk, City Manager, led the discussion on the Code of Ethics and Conduct, stating this ordinance has been discussed on numerous occasions with Council and staff for more than a year. The concern for ethics is not something new, however, there is still not a good model ordinance for the ethics. One of the things we must look at in ethics regulations, one aspect is legal and the other is political. When it gets down to it, the only requirements for eligibility to mn for Council is in the Texas Election Law. To exclude some people from serving on boards and commission would be against the state constitution. Conflict of interest is an issue and the state statutes are clear on this matter. By having the Code of Ethics and Conduct in ordinance form the issues can be dealt with by the City Council. Without the ordinance, the District Attorney would be the authority in dealing with conflict of interest. City Attorney, Allen Taylor, stated the real benefit to the City in having this ordinance over and above just stating the moral and ethical issues and being sure the members are informed ofit, is the localenforeement issue. Right nowifyou believe you have a board or commission member or an officer of the City in any capacity violating this, the only effective remedy is to pass it on to the District Attorney's office. They do not like to get involved in these things, but if they do, they have to treat it as a criminal matter and once you start the chain moving, it moves and they will prosecute. There are a lot of seemingly innocent, unknowing violations you have to address, but by having this ordinance, Council can deal with it as an administrative matter without seeking the full force and power of government on somebody who made a simple error in judgement that Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page thirteen Agenda Item #8-I, Continued was wrong, but didn't cause any direct harm to anybody. You don't have to face the real tough decision of do we have to send this to the District Attorney's office for them to deal with. Councilmember Richarme commented that he feels over the next sixty (60) days we are going to see this issue raised as part of the election. Mayor Fickes stated he knows where Richarme is coming from however, if you are living in the community and have a business in the community, it makes for a vibrant community. Mayor Fickes stated he does not think that because someone works at a bank or works in a construction company, that this excludes them from being on a board of commission or running for Council. The voters can make that decision for Council, and the Council can make that decision when appointing commission members, as we have on many cases. Councilmember Richarme stated he agrees with the Mayor, but the distinction is if the decisions being made by this body, or any other, being made for the personal gain of that individual. Not, are they being made for the betterment of the city. Richarme stated that is something that jumps out as a conflict of interest. Councilmember Wambsganss stated he feels the real issue is whether or not it influences a person's decision. Councilmember Richarme stated he is not trying to exclude a class of citizens from being a part of the city government. Councilmember Farrier stated he feels this electorate is getting more astute, and they will ask the questions. This ordinance will give Council the tool to deal with those who step over the boundaries of common decency and ethics, which is worth having. Maybe a candidate will volunteer to provide a disclosure, but the City cannot make them. Councilmember Richarme stated he wants the ordinance to include on page sixteen of the ordinance, where it talks about distribution of ethics and conduct, that every city official get an annual receipt of the code and provides back to the City, a signature, acknowledging understanding of the code, and every board or applicant get a copy of the code. That new applicants gets a copy of the ordinance. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes March 7, 1995 page fourteen Agenda item #8-I. Continued Allen Taylor stated as part of the Oath of Office, a signature could be required, stating they have read and understand the Code of Ethics and Conduct. Motion was made to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 635, Code of Ethics and Conduct, including the amendments as noted above regarding the annual receipt of the code, with a signature being returned to the City acknowledging their understanding of the code. Motion: Farrier Second: Franks Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Farrier, Franks, Richarme, Wambsganss, Evans, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #12. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Fickes at 1:00 a.m. Motion: Wambsganss Second: Franks Ayes: Wambsganss, Franks, Farrier, Richarme, Evans, Fickes Nays: None Appro_v.~~ ~ahdra L LeGrand City Secretary City of Southlake, Texas CITY COUNCIL MEETING SIGN UP IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK DURING THE MEETING DATE: - 7- NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE AGENDA ITEM y Z / \/ ta OM vimm >>>I ammo ,.--. • . .. A /a � ' h 7W �" ..� ".. " �„.a„�` t S z .F a� L. @ :': :,*, 1� �i . a2ewas.,. �.4;. ` \� �... Sign Type Permitted Structure Overall Height Letter /Logo Height (lcttcrflogo) Sign Area Num of Signs Other Requirements Attached (General) N/A Dist< from ROW Height 1.5 sf for every l' in bldg. or 1 per street fronts e 50' 24" lease space width; max 400 sf; 8 Residential adjacency; Not allowed on any 51' -100' 30" also limited to middle 75% of facade other than the main front of the building hi 101'•150' 36" which taco property 151' -200' property; lease width P Petty zoned for single-family 201'- 250' 48" residential uses it the cannot is ot extcnd 150' of the tty; cannxtend above roof line; cannot protrude greater than 18" kJ CL 251'•300' 54" t > 301' 60" F Monument (General) Sign bases to be constructed 6' excluding base; N/A 200 sf with max of 100 sf per 1 per street frontage c/) of the same material as the base may be frontage Illumhnation: Internal only; front building facade on the additional 2' tack y c and materials same site or shall be stone or not to be visible from public ROW to brick CL Freestanding (General) Shall be constructed or 20'; must have 7' of N/A W 200 sf with max of 10(1 al' covered with materials which clearance below sign face per 1 per street frontage; SH Residential adjacency: Not allowed within 150' C7 match the masonry portion of 114: only within 200' of of any property zoned for single- family the principle e m building or shall ROW and 200' thin residential uses; Internal illumination only, be stone or bride spacing; except for neon; No closer than 100' to Others: min 7 acres, 10 intersecting ROW lessees Ground (Genera!) N/A 4' N/A 12 sf; 6 sf max per face N/A May not be placed in public ROW Business Attached, freestanding r 8 Same as general Same as general Same as general monument 8 Same as general Same as general a 4 a Readerbaard Frtxuarhdng or monument Same az eneral as general i C1 8 Same as general Cannot exceed 2/3 of sign per Same Z face 8 Manual or electronic may only be approved by a conditional permit by Council; must have lockable covering Menuboard Freestanding monument or 6'; Freestanding may N/A a attached extend to and 24 sf, one face 2 per site i Z 8ro P Must be located at the side or rear of building level w Z Subdivision Entry Monument or attached Monument: 6' Same as general Monument: 100 sf; max 50 sf 1 monument or 2 at- lathed Same as general Attached: Cannot per face project above wall Attached: 32 sf per st, entrance a (not in combination) Subdivision Freestanding or monument Freestanding: 12' N/A Directory —, Monument: 6' 100 sf, wiUn 50' max per face 1 per street entrance Same as general except: residential adjacency and location don't apply Banner; Pennants, Attached Same as general streamers 2 per site Screamers 8 Same as general 100 sf; no max for except: streamers not Only for 30 days 3 times a calendar year, 60 allowed above roof days between; must be attached to supporting line sW cruces Balloons, Floating Attached 50' to end of tether Same as general Same as 1 > 3 cubic ft.; no limit on Duration same as above Devices line smaller sizes Model Home Monument, freestanding, 6'; Freestanding may y Same as general 100 sf, with 50' mar er face 1 si ground extend to ground P gn per builder per Same as general except: material, residential subdivision adjacency and location don't apply Special Purpose Attached or freestanding Same as general Same as general 100 sf, with 50' max per face 4 per event or occasion Same as general except: place 30 days before event and remove after 3 days; material, res. ` • -- - adjacency and location don't apply Search Lights I _ _______ - i rcestandirh6 N/A N/A N/A 2 per sitc Same as general except for 7 dys twice a calendar year, with 60 days between; material ( 1 t I requirements don't apply Construction Freestanding, monument Same as erheal 8 Sane as general ground Same as general 1 per site Same as general except: placed any time after y � building permit for conunerdal, developer's 0 Z agreement for residential; must be removed upon CO (90% Tots for residential) D evelopment Freestanding, reestanding, monument or Same as general Same as general Saline as general d ground 8 1 per site Same as general except: duration (above): material, residential adjacency, and location cc don't apply Subdivision Marketing Ground Same as general N/A Same as eneml tt B 3 signs max adver- rising the Same as general except; > 50' from Intersecting same Item per grouping ROW; > 10' apart; placed 12:00 noon Friday to te 0 ta Political Ground 12:00 noon Monday N/A N/A N/A i . Unlimited N/A Tradesman Ground Same as general N/A Same as general Same as general Same as general except: placed only after building permit, removed after completion of trade advertised Real Estate Ground, freestanding, Same as general N/A monument or attached 50 sf 1 per every 5 acres N/A except: ground: 6'; attached: below roof line Window N/A N/A N/A Not to obscure more than 50% N/A May not include exposed gas tubes within two window area feet of window glass Garage/Yard Sale Ground Same as general N/A Same as general 4 per sale Placement 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday or on any legal holiday Off -site Development Freestanding or monument Same as general N/A except: freestanding: 100 sf with a mar of 50 sf per 1 per subdivision plus I U spacing measured radially; must be __ 15' face more for those with > 200 removed alter 75% of buildin L Permits issued G: \ORD \SIGNS \COMPARE3.WPD . r 1 1 • J {xe ..�.