Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1999-03-23
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MARCH 23, 1999 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans. Members: Debra Edmondson, Gary Fawks, Ronnie Kendall and Wayne Moffat. COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Scott Martin. CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Curtis E. Hawk; Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton; Assistant to the City Manager Shelli Siemer; Director of Finance Lou Ann Heath; Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman; Director of Economic Development Greg Last; Planner Dennis Killough; Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy; Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead; Deputy Directors of Public Works Ron Harper and Charlie Thomas; Capital Projects Coordinator Shawn Poe; City Attorney E. Allen Taylor Jr.; and, City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand. Agenda Item #1, Call to Order Mayor Rick Stacy called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. and announced that Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Scott Martin will not be present tonight as his wife has become ill and he needs to stay with her. Agenda Item #2-A~ Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that the City Council would be going into executive session pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.075, 551.076 to seek consultation with City Attorney regarding pending and contemplated litigations, to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property, a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City, to deliberate the appointment and evaluation of public officials, to confer with one or more employees to receive information from or to question the employees, and to deliberate the deployment of specific occasions for implementations of security personnel or devices. Council adjourned into executive session at 6:10 p.m. Council adjourned into open session at 7:20 p.m. Agenda Item #2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session Motion was made to authorize staff to enter into a purchase agreement to buy the land discussed during executive session in the amount of $45,000 per acre for 61 acres. Motion: Kendall Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 1 Second: Edmondson Ayes: Kendall, Moffat, Edmondson, Evans, Fawks, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #3, Invocation, Joel Calhoun, Assembly of God Church The invocation was given by Joel Calhoun, pastor of the Southlake Assembly of God Church. Reverend Calhoun stated he is new to the community even though the church has been there for a long time, and wants to be a part of the community and has enjoyed serving as the pastor of the month for March. Calhoun stated this Saturday morning at 8:00 a.m. the church will be serving breakfast and host as a speaker, a member of the "Promise Keepers," Smokey John Reed. He welcomed everyone to the meeting. Agenda Item g4-A, Mayor's Report (7:25 p.m.) Mayor Stacy stated during the Mayor's Report that Deputy Director of Public Safety Fire Services Division Garland Wilson, had announcements. Mr. Wilson stated he has three different news items to present: 1) Household Hazardous I~aste Collection and Disposal. In a continuing effort to encourage an environmental safe disposal of household hazardous waste, the City of Southlake will be conducting a one day household hazardous waste collection program for the citizens of Southlake to dispose of chemical waste products such as paint, poison, etc. at no cost to the citizen. This service is limited to residential disposal only for the homeowners of Southlake. The drop site will be located at the Public Works Facility, 1950 East Continental Boulevard, Southlake, and conducted on Saturday, May 1, 1999, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For additional information contact Southlake Fire Services at 481-5581 extension 847. 2) Recall Notice on Carbon Monoxide Alarms. Carbon Monoxide alarms are responded to quite often by the Southlake Fire Department and are seen in most homes in Southlake, therefore, it is important that the community be aware of this recall of the alarms. The alarms are manufactured by Kid Safety. The models could alarm late or not at all. The recall includes the Lifesaver model, manufactured between June 1997 and January 1998 and the Nighthawk model, manufactured between November 1998 and March 1999. The date of manufacturing is on the back of the trait. Director Wilson stated, "If you have a unit fitting this description, call Kids Safety at 888-543-3346, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. EST. You may also contact DPS Inspector Vickie Hess Miller at 481-5581, extension 734, and we will be glad to assist you." 3) Department of Public Safety, City of Southlake. The City of Southlake Department of Public Safety Fire Services Division received national accreditation from the Commission on Fire Safety International on March 19, 1999. This designation identifies Southlake Fire Services as having achieved the required compliance with international recognized standards of professional excellence in fire service operations. As one of only Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 2 fourteen departments in the United States to receive this accreditation Southlake's department is the first in the State of Texas. Southlake is the first Public Safety Department in the nation to receive this award. Mr. Wilson stated, "This award was not achievable without the help of the other departments within the City. They looked at ten major categories including finance, GIS, response times, and goals and objectives." Mayor Stacy made the following announcements: March 24, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. at the Senior Activity Center, the Arbor Day and Tree City USA presentations will take place. Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Martin will be present to receive the award. This event is presented with the efforts of Keep Southlake Beautiful and the City of Southlake Community Services Department. March 29, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., at Johnson Elementary School and again on April 13, 1999 at the 7:00 p.m. at the Senior Activity Center, SPIN will host Town Hall meetings to discuss the Traffic Management Bond Program. March 29, 1999, at Carroll High School, the Southlake Sister Cities will be hosting a pot-luck supper for the delegation of students from Toyoma, Japan. The public is invited to attend and should bring a covered dish. March 30, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., the 1998-99 Leadership Southlake Class is presenting "Family First Town Meeting" sponsored and hosted by WFAA/Channel 8 News. The topic will be "Stress & Depression." The public is invited to attend. April 1, 1999, 7:30 a.m. Southlake Executive Forum will meet at Tuscany's Restaurant in Southlake. City offices will be closed on April 2, 1999 for Easter Holiday. May 6, 1999, National Day of Prayer. Look for more information. Mayor Rick Stacy presented a proclamation to A1 and Megan Suarez, who competed with 25 teams from across America in the "United States Tennis Association Father-Daughter Hard Court Championship" in San Diego, and had their dream come true by winning the national title. Proclamations were presented to Jenise Birks, of the Southlake Fire Department proclaiming "Poison Prevention Week" and to Garland Wilson, proclaiming April 4-10 as Building Safety Week. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report (7:40 p.m.) City Manager Curtis Hawk announced that this will be the last City Council meeting for Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, who will be leaving the City of Southlake with her Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 3 last day being March 31, 1999. Hawk stated, "We will truly miss Lou Ann and thank her for the eight years she has been with the City." Deputy Director of Public Works Ron Harper presented the Town Square Status Report, as follows: Town Square Work continued on three buildings on Phase I. North Carroll Realignment Due to weather related problems and t~anchise utilities we were not able to complete the road prior to the grand opening of Town Square; however, the contractor was able to complete enough of the project to provide access to the site. Town Hall Mr. Harper presented the latest version of the space concept plan. Staff has reviewed this plan to determine conformance with the programming book and conversations with the end users (including Council). This concept plan is to reflect progress and is not intended for official approval from Council. Agenda Item #4-C, SPIN Report (7:45 p.m.) The SPIN Report was presented by Darrell Faglie, representative from SPIN #7, who indicated he had nothing to report. He congratulated Mr. Stebbins and the planners on the project done on Town Square. As a citizen, he is very pleased with the project. Agenda Item #4-D, Parks and Recreation Board Report (7:50 p.m.) The Parks and Recreation Board report was given by Cara White. At the last Park Board meeting the members met with Park Board/JUC Liaison Jim Glover, asking him to discuss with the Joint Utilization Committee (JUC) the joint use facilities and how they are maintaining them. Ms. White stated, "The Parks Division has taken over the maintenance of the CISD fields. Them have been a number of complaints by people who play on the fields. There have been a number of complaints on the Durham Elementary field for a long time. It is not fair for people who play on the fields. The Nature Center was moved about two weeks ago, and they are in the process of pouring the peers for the foundation and they will be moving it back there. The Nature Center and road will not be completed for about two years. The Equestrian Trail Riders of Southlake are having a meeting tomorrow night to discuss trails. We are also talking with the City of Flower Mound, Town of Trophy Club and the City of Roanoke and Marshall Creek about tying the trails in all around Lake Grapevine. The Corps of Engineers are trying to work with us with the trails. This all relates to updating the Trail Master Plan." Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 4 Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda (7:53 p.m.) Mayor Stacy stated this is the time of the evening when Council votes on several items at one time. He informed citizens present of the procedure Council follows in voting on the "consent agenda" and asked if anyone had any comments or opposition to express regarding any items listed in this section of the agenda. Mayor Stacy read the consent agenda items into the record as follows: Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on March 2, 1999, and the minutes of the Special City Council meeting held on February 23, 1999. Authorize the Mayor to enter into agreements between New World Systems Corporation and the City of Southlake for standard software license and services to replace the majority of the City's software operating system. Ordinance No. 480-305, 2na reading (ZA 98-118), Rezoning and Development Plan for Chesapeake Place. The applicant has requested to table this item to the April 6, 1999, City Council meeting. ZA 98-119, Preliminary Plat for Chesapeake Place, on property legally described as Tracts 4A, 4A8, 4A9, 4B, and 4E2, situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and being approximately 54.95 acres. The applicant has requested to table this item to the April 6, 1999, City Council meeting. Ordinance No. 739, 1st reading, Authorizing the issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Tax, and Waterworks and Sewer System (Limited Pledge) Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999," and resolving other matters incident and relating to the issuance, payment, security, sale and delivery of said Certificates. Ordinance No. 740, 1st reading, Authorizing the issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Tax, and Tax Increment Surplus Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999," and resolving other matters incident and relating to the issuance, payment, security, sale and delivery of said Certificates. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda items as follows: Items #5-A, #5-B, tabling Items #5-C and #5-D; and approving Items #8-C and #8-D on first reading. Motion: Mo ffat Second: Evans Ayes: Moffat, Evans, Fawks, Kendall, Edmondson, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Minutes of Regular City Council meeting held on February 23, 1999 and the Special City Council meeting held on February 23, 1999. The minutes were approved 6-0 vote. Authorize the Mayor to enter into agreements between New World Systems Corporation and the City of Southlake for standard software license and services to replace the majority of the City's software operating system. As previously discussed with City Council, our present systems throughout the City are not compatible with each other. This creates inefficiencies in the process of data entry and dissemination. Each department in city government operates in a different environment that does not allow the sharing of information from the various programs. In addition, the majority of the software being utilized is not Year 2000 compliant. One of the specifications in the request for proposal was that all sofavare be Year 2000 compliant. This problem was recognized and prepared for during the 98-99 budget process. The budgeted amount of $724,300 was for the replacement of this software, the conversion of data to the new system, and the purchase and upgrades of AS400's. New World Systems submitted the lowest RFP that would meet the City's needs for $591,095. The estimated cost of this project will be $818,834. This will be an overage of $94,534. However, in preparation for the present fiscal year, the City budgeted approximately $100,000 for the lease purchase of these items, had the City Council chosen to fund in that manner. Ordinance No. 480-305, 2nd reading (ZA 98-118), Rezoning and Development Plan for Chesapeake Place. This item was tabled at the request of the applicant, Four Peaks Development, Inc. 5-D. ZA 98-119, Preliminary Plat for Chesapeake Place. This item was tabled at the request of the applicant, Four Peaks Development, Inc. Ordinance No. 739, 1st reading, Authorizing the issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Tax and Waterworks, and Sewer System Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999." The FY 1998-99 budget includes a capital projects component that provides cost estimates and projected timing of water, sewer, roadway, drainage and building improvement/construction projects. Estimated project costs for FY 1998-99 are $16,647,593. The City is issuing certificates of obligation for these projects because the projects are more than the City can fund in one year from current revenues or other sources of funds. A copy of the memorandum from Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, to the City Manager dated March 18, 1999, is hereby attached to the minutes of the meeting. 8-D. Ordinance No. 740, Ist reading, Authorizing the issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Tax and Tax Increment Surplus Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 6 1999." The agreement for architectural services and construction management services for the Town Hall project were recently approved by the City Council. The total for both of these agreements is $2.7 million ($1.2 million for the architectural services, $390,000 for the construction management fee and $1.11 million for the general conditions fee for construction management). An additional $800,000 is included for infrastructure and to provide funding to initiate the phased construction of the project. The par amount of the certificates is proposed at $3.61 million, of which $110,000 is for accrued interest, issuance costs, underwriter's discount and bond insurance premium. A copy of the memorandum from Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, to the City Manager dated March 18, 1999, is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Agenda Item #6, Public Forum (8:00 p.m.) Walter Tim& 1372 Lakeview Drive, Cross Timber Hills Addition, Southlake. Mr. Tims stated he thought the City was going to start construction of sewer lines in his subdivision. Mayor Stacy responded by saying the city is in the process of getting the appropriate easements before the sewer system can be installed. Boyd Dollar, 525 Brooks Court, Roanoke. Mr. Dollar asked the City Council to help him get his address changed to Southlake, adding, he has had a Roanoke address since he lived in the area. Agenda Item #6-B, FY98 Audit Presentation from Weaver and Tidweli (8:03 p.m.) Gerry L. Gaither, Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. Mr. Gaither presented the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1998. Mr. Gaither stated, "We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of the City of Southlake, Texas, as of and for the year ended September 30, 1998, as listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Southlake at September 30, 1998, and the results of its operations and cash flows of its proprietary fund for the year ten ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles." A copy of the audit report is available for examination in the Office of the City Secretary. Agenda Item #7-A, Ordinance No. 480-301, 2na reading, Rezoning and Site Plan for Barton House Uncommon Care~ Inc. (8:13 p.m.) Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 7 Ordinance No. 480-301, 2"d reading (ZA 98-149), Rezoning and Site Plan for Barton House Uncommon Care, Inc., on property legally described as Tract 6D situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 3.046 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "S-P-I" Detailed Site Plan District with "O-1" Office District uses including a personal care facility for Alzheimer's patients. Owner and Applicant: Uncommon Care, Inc., dba Barton House. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated ten (10) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) response was received from Jack R. Jones, 1250 North White Chapel Boulevard, Southlake, undecided. Mr. Jones said, "Have no problem with this application for zoning changes if Barton House is constructed on the property. Any other businesses, etc., would change our opinion if we were not aware of final decision for property development." Bob Bouchard, applicant, Uncommon Care. Mr. Bouchard was present to answer questions for Council. Councilmember Gary Fawks asked if they had talked with Countryside Bible Church about tying into their sewer system. Robert Montgomery, Civil Engineer. Mr. Montgomery stated John Levitt informed them that the church is only building a sewer system big enough for the church. If they upgrade the system to include the Baron House it will cost them an additional $250,000. Councilmember Gary Fawks asked them if they would remove the student apartment from the plan, as the City must comply with the density ordinances. Fawks stated he is not comfortable saying we are almost in compliance with the 12 unit per acre maximum density. Councilmember Debra Edmondson stated she agreed with Councilmember Fawks. Bob Bouchard stated having the student apartment is helpful to the patients as it allows for someone to be around who can help them out. Frank Powell, Registered Sanitarian. Mr. Powell explained the original report on the sewer system for the project. He stated he has over designed the system and that the system will be built in Type 2 soil. He noted he will be using two 1,500-gallon systems using Type 3 soil calculations, which will make it better. A copy of the report from Mr. Powell is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Councilmember Ronnie Kendall asked Mr. Bouchard if he had any other operations like this that are on septic systems. Mr. Bouchard replied they did not. PUBLIC HEARING: John Larson, 335 Ravenaux Drive, Southlake. Mr. Larson stated he is disappointed in Mr. Montgomery's comments regarding the County's slow response, stating Mr. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 8 Montgomery would not know for four weeks about his septic system issues. Mr. Larson stated he made a fifteen minute phone call and got all his information. Larson stated according to information from David Jefferson, Tarrant County Health Department, that the submission they received from the applicant is not able to be approved at this time. He also addressed the drainage issues with this property. David Jefferson, Tarrant County Health Department. Mr. Jefferson stated he is manager of the environmental issues for Tarrant County. He stated the problems that they have with the applicant's submission is details and not concept. Public hearing closed. Councilmember Gary Fawks stated, "I do want to make it clear that I think these folks are going to do a first class job. I don't have a problem with the use on this particular piece of property or the zoning that is being proposed, and having said that, as we are approving this site plan, I want to say to the developer that the City of Southlake's development policy provides that the plat on this property cannot be approved unless you are using a public equivalent wastewater treatment system. The plat will not go through unless the system meets the requirements." Motion was made to approve ZA 98-149, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 19, 1999; allowing for the reduction of the square footage of the housing units to range between 185 s.f. and 215 s.f.; accepting the driveway configuration as shown; changing the word Ravenaux to Countryside Court; on Item #3, allowing the driveways as shown. Fawks stated, "And requiring that the applicant provide proof of a public equivalent sewer system before acceptance of any plat of this site and prior to issuance of any building permit." Motion: Fawks Second: Kendall Ayes: Fawks, Kendall, Moffat, Edmondson, Evans, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #7-B, Ordinance No. 480-306, 2nd reading, ZA 99-005 (8:45 p.m.) Ordinance No. 480-306, 2nd reading (ZA 99-005), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract lA2 situated in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and being approximately 9.996 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District with a requested zoning of "RE" Residential Estate District. Applicant: Gene Campbell, Inc. Owners: Trigg and Traci Moore. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated eleven (11) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and two (2) responses were received from: Lisa and Bobby Rawls, 165 East Dove Street, Southlake, in favor; Phyllis Skinner, 315 East Dove Street, Southlake, in favor. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 9 Trigg Moore, 6310 Edenberg Drive, Colleyville. Mr. Moore stated they hope to build their home on the ten acre parcel of land. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public heating. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-306, 2nfl reading (ZA 99-005), rezoning this property from Agricultural to Residential Estate Zoning District. Motion: Edmondson Second: Evans Ayes: Edmondson, Evans, Fawks, Kendall, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #7-C~ Ordinance No. 480-304, 2na Reading, ZA 99-002 (8:50 p.m.) Ordinance No. 480-304, 2nd reading (ZA 99-002), Rezoning on property legally described as being Tract lA2 situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being approximately 1.97 acres. Current zoning is "O-1" Office District with a requested zoning of "SF-30" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: V. Patrick Gray Custom Homes, Inc. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated eleven (11) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and four (4) written responses were received, from the following: David Yd.. Callahan, 2411 Taylor Street, Southlake, in favor; Hogue, 1507 East Dove Road, Southlake, opposed, stating, "I am opposed to this zoning because Mrs. Higgins was forced to sell a full acre plat street one-half right of way."; F. C. LeVrier, 1515 East Dove Road, Southlake, opposed, stating, "But would entertain a change from "O-1" to "SF-A", all surrounding property owners have a one-acre plus home site. Mrs. Higgins was selling a .75 acre portion of her property to someone to build a home. The City made her sell a one-acre portion in order for buyer to build a home. We need to be fair and treat everyone on an equal basis, be consistent." Marlo S. Moline, 1481 East Dove Street, Southlake, opposed, stating "I am strongly opposed to this request; Emerald Estates is zoned "SF-1A," all surrounding property owners have one-acre plus home sites. The area has severe drainage problems, which will not be helped with construction of three homes." A Concept Plan is required with a request for "SF-30" Single Family Residential District zoning. Due to the limited scope of the development of this property, the Zoning Administrator has waived the required Concept Plan. An application for a Plat Showing is being processed concurrently with this rezoning application which proposed two lots of approximately 35,000 square feet within the boundary of this request with no new streets or significant public infrastructure. Pat Gray, applicant. Mr. Gray stated he plans on building two single family homes on the property. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 10 PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-304, 2nd reading, rezoning the property from "O-1" Office District to "SF-30" Single Family Residential. Motion: Moffat Second: Fawks Ayes: Moffat, Fawks, Kendall, Edmondson, Evans, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #7-D, Ordinance No. 737~ 2nd reading, Consent to Transfer of Control of Cable Television System and Franchise from Marcus Cable to Paul G. Allen (8:55 p.m.) Director of Community Services Kevin Hugrnan presented for second reading Ordinance No. 737, consent to transfer of control of cable television system and fi'anchise from Marcus Cable to Paul G. Allen, who will be doing business as Charter Communications. Hugman stated there are no financial commitments on the part of the City in affecting this transfer if approved. The transfer agreement provides for substantial fines to Paul G. Allen in the event of failure to meet specified customer service standards. The franchise fees will remain the same as in the current agreement. This transfer agreement will remain in effect until the expiration of the current agreement in June 2008. Mr. Hugman stated the Interact services are included in the agreement as "cable services" and are therefore subject to the same franchise fee. This language was included at the recommendation of the consortium attorneys in order to allow cities to collect franchise fees on Interact services provided by cable operators. Since there is no specific legislation regarding these types of services, excluding them from the definition of cable services would allow the franchise to provide the services without our ability to collect any revenue from these services. The FCC is considering this issue and will likely rule that Interuet services are considered "cable services." Councilmember Debra Edmondson asked Mr. Hugman to go over two items: 1) what did Marcus or Charter do when they added the new channels? And what was the cost increase? Hugman responded, "Because under the old system we were under Harron Cable System (the provider we had before Marcus) they did not require converter boxes for the extended basic service channels. When Marcus bought out the system a couple years ago they did not change any of that. They were providing the signal to Trophy Club, Roanoke and Southlake area through the Trophy Club head end. For the rest of the system, their signal was out of the Fort Worth head end. When they did the fiber optic upgrade they put in converter boxes or required the use of converter boxes to get those channels on the extended basic service tier, unscrambled, with the intent of doing away with the head end at the Trophy Club area and moving everything to one head end at the Fort Worth Office. There was an increase in the price for the service itself, with the extended basic service they had added some channels, and they had gotten FCC approval to increase rates for that upgrade. The biggest effect on the Southlake residents was the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 11 coverter boxes, and the fact that now they had to have a converter box to get that extended basic service level that they did not have to have before. Each converter box was a rental rate of $3.43 per month. For people who have several television sets, they saw an increase on their bills. The basic rate is $32 and on top of that are the fees for the boxes. Councilmember Edmondson asked Mr. Hugman to go over with her again, the basic concessions the City got out of Marcus Cable. Mr. Hugman responded to the following: Customer service standards. Holding the rates down-multiply terminal discount rates (they agreed to a multiply terminal discount rate, instead of $3.43 for each box; for three years they agreed to $3.43 for first box, the second would be $2.43 and the third box and any additional boxes would be $1.43). No more rate increases for the remainder of this calendar year. This language is in the acceptance agreement which is the same for all of the cities. Councilmember Ronnie Kendall asked for an example of an "occurrence." Mr. Hugman stated Marcus maintains a record of all occurrences for purposes of an audit. If the City requests an audit and there is a discrepancy of more than 3% then they will pay the bills (the City costs of the audit). Councilmember Edmondson complimented Mr. Hugman for the hard work and stated he had done a good job in negotiating this agreement, adding that when dealing with a monolpy, it is not an easy situation, and that Kevin probably got the City the best deal possible that he could have gotten the City. Edmondson stated, "I am disappointed that after the City got so many complaints about the cost of the box that Charter was not willing to work with us more including the fact that at one point they had offered fifty cents a rate for the fourth box. I had stated some of my concerns at the previous meeting with the fact that they are going to be using our right-of-ways to provide Internet service and that that service has not yet been classified by FCC as a cable service. The options here would have been no cable at all or this. I chose to vote for the ordinance the last time, because at this point in time it is probably more preferable to have an option out there." Councilmember Gary Fawks stated, "I discussed the contract the next day with Mr. Wareheim and my understanding that the rates went up with the upgrades the system and there was nineteen channels added. I pushed again for fifty cents on the fourth box, and his comment was that we are the only community that are getting the reduced rates on the boxes, and not only that, but his commitment to take them through for the next couple years. We are getting some benefit from this; maybe not as much as we would have hoped, and maybe not even what they promised us to begin with. Hopefully and significantly, we have saved our citizens some money and I hope the service levels are up to par." Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 12 PUBLIC HEARING: No comments during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 737, 2nd reading. Motion: Fawks Second: Evans Ayes: Fawks, Evans, Kendall, Edmondson, Moffat Nays: Stacy Approved: 5-1 vote Agenda Item #8-A, Ordinance No. 480-309, lst reading, ZA 99-025 (9:10 p.m.) Ordinance No. 480-309, 1st reading (ZA 99-025), Rezoning and Site Plan for Southlake Town Square, Phase 2, Block 10, on property legally described as a portion of Tract 3 situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No.481, and being approximately 7.932 acres. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District, with a requested zoning of "S-P-l" Detailed Site Plan District and "C-3" General Commercial District uses including a U.S. Post Office and associated outside storage. Applicant: Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. Owners: The Fechetel Group with general parmers: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Joseph Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, and James Milton Fechtel. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated she will update Council on the Planning and Zoning recommendation, noting a full presentation was given during the Joint City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held earlier this evening. For the site plan approval for Phase 2, of the Post Office and related retail, the Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval with a 5-0 vote, subject to Staff Review comments dated March 12, 1999, however, on Item gl they allow the dumpster screening as proposed and as discussed; Item #2 the setbacks as proposed; Item #3b to allow the articulation as shown; Item #5a-b, accepting the bufferyards and landscape as proposed; Item #7c-d, allowing the parking as proposed; Item gl0, granting all the variations as listed in Item gl0; On Item #15, the P&Z would like to require the sidewalk on the Town Square side and that it not be meandering (they did not feel there was sufficient room on the west side of the road given the new aligmnent of Carroll to accommodate that). The applicant requested that the City provide a crosswalk at the designated crossing area for safety; P&Z would also like to add Item #6a4, the driveways intersecting north Carroll from Lot 1 must be a minimum 50 foot stacking depth and they provided 40 feet. The P &Z also recommended that the chain-link fence that the Post Office is providing, that it be the black vinyl coated chain-link. They also recommended to reconfigure the mail drop area to improve service, stacking and safety, and felt there needed to be some redesign in that area. They accepted the applicant's commitment to improve the aesthetics along the eastern wall along State Street. The applicant has agreed to place the masonry columns 20 foot on center with wrought iron inserts and will also provide some planting materials either inside or outside the wall to enhance the aesthetics. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 13 Frank Bliss, 1362 Lakeview Drive, Southlake. Mr. Bliss stated they would respectfully request approval as submitted in accordance with the letter that was submitted earlier this evening with the following changes. Item #1, Karen Gandy's comments are agreed as to the upgrade of that wall to masonry colunms 20 feet on center with wrought iron and landscaping. Item #6a, 1, 2, 3, and, Item #4, as to impervious coverage. The items that are not in accordance are Items g4, #6a, 1,2,3, with 4th item added which is the 50 foot stacking requirement for the drive on Carroll vs. the 40-foot plan. Councilmember Gary Fawks asked for the 2nd reading to come back with landscape plans for the area along Carroll Avenue. He commented on the aesthetics along the backs of the buildings on this phase. Councilmember Debra Edmondson had questions regarding the lighting that backs up to the properties in Southview Estates. Michael Murray, Urban Architecture. Mr. Murray responded to Ms. Edmondson's question. He stated they have spent quite a bit of time addressing the lighting and orientation to Southview to be sure it does not become a nuisance. The standard antique street lights would be carried through internal to the block along North Carroll Avenue. There was a look at taking the street lights out due to glare. The lights along North Carroll area parking lot fixtures all 22 feet in height and they are carrying the required foot candles at the property line and not moving any light to the west. The lights will be in the range of .5 -1, which is consistent with what is required. Directional heads are all facing to the east and the Post Office will have their standard lights which is internal to the block. Again, the streetscape carried the antique fixtures and along North Carroll will have the parking lot fixtures. Ms. Edmondson stated she had some calls on the brightness of the lights on Carroll Avenue and the property owner on Ownby Court has some concerns about the lights on Carroll and the signage on the building. Brian Stebbins, Town Square. Mr. Stebbins stated they will be consistent with what they have done so far in Town Square. They went through a lot of time to go with the lower level lighting. He stated he sees everything being consistent with what they started with. In terms of the signage itself, there is nothing that will be inconsistent with that. Councilmember Ronnie Kendall asked questions about the parking spaces on the north of the Post Office, asking if they were for employee parking? Stebbins replied, "yes." She asked if there was parking on the north of the building for the public to use? Stebbins replied, "no." Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 14 Larry Janisek, architect for the Post Office. Mr. Janisek stated the lobby was designed to be accessible at both sides of the building at the street. The main entrance is at the tower on the comer. There is also an entrance into the lobby where the actual public service counters are. There are really three ways into the post office. The customer parking will be the street parking right in front of the building. He noted there are six tenants being proposed for Building 10-D. There is enough parking in Lot 2 to have a surplus of parking for the other tenants, employees and for the post office. Councilmember Gary Fawks thanked the Post Office representatives and Mr. Stebbins for allowing the City Council to use their project an a guinea-pig this evening with the fast-tracking. He stated he knows there is a lot to do to make two presentations in one evening. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-309, 1st reading, for zoning and site plan for Southlake Town Square, Phase 2, Block 10; subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated March 12, 1999, per the motion made by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 23, 1999. Motion: Fawks Second: Kendall Councilmember Debra Edmondson commented in regards to impervious coverage and noted that she is usually very strict on that. She stated, "The point has been well made on Saturday that it is a unique development and we are not dealing with a cookie-cutter situation. I think if we are talking five or six spaces, because of the uniqueness of the development, this is not an issue for me." Ayes: Fawks, Kendall, Moffat, Edmondson, Evans, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #8-B, ZA 99-026, Revised Preliminary Plat for Lots 10 & 11, Town Square (9:50 p.m.) ZA 99-026, Revised Preliminary Plat for Block 10 and 11, Southlake Town Square, on property legally described as being a portion of Tract 3 situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 581, and being approximately 11.8 acres. Applicants: Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. Owners: The Fechtel Group with general partners; Alicia Made Fechtel, Charles Joseph Feehtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, and James Milton Fechtel. Frank Bliss, applicant. Mr. Bliss asked the City Council to table this item and to bring it back with the second reading of the ordinance. Motion was made to table ZA 99-026, time certain April 6, 1999, as requested by the applicant. Motion: Fawks Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 15 Second: Evans Ayes: Fawks, Evans, Kendall, Moffat, Edmondson, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote (to table at request of applicant). Agenda Item #9-A, Resolution No. 99-16, Number of Zoning Applications that may be Scheduled on One Agenda. (9:51 p.m.) City Manager Curtis Hawk stated this item is on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Debra Edmondson, in order to attempt once again to limit the length of City Council meetings. He stated since the October meetings, 70% of the meetings adjourned before midnight and 30% exceeded the target time. No one likes long meetings. Perhaps there are other methods for limiting the time spent in meetings which can be considered, such as the time meetings begin, number of meetings for certain items, etc. The previous resolutions, Resolution No. 95-24 and Resolutions 97-22, dealt with points or number of items on the agenda. "The problem we have as a City Council, is there are a number of other items that are not related to development issues and there is no way to tell where the direction will go. Nobody needs to be here after twelve midnight." Councilmember Debra Edmondson commented at the last meeting we heard a couple of important issues after 11:00 p.m. in the evening, with adjournment at 1:00 a.m. Gary Fawks stated the appropriate thing is to say Council is not going to start items after a certain time. Curtis Hawk stated, "There are some things we can do in a different format. One of the things we can consider is:. The Charter says we can have as many Councilmembers as are needed. Maybe we can have a day time meeting for some of the things that do not effect the public. Maybe we ought to look at some alternatives to get some things off the plate." It was suggested no to have presentations by the developers during the work session. The meeting times were discussed with no decisions made. Councilmember Debra Edmondson stated the action requested with this item, was to repeal Resolution No. 97-22, and reconsider Resolution No. 95-24, however, she is willing to discuss other options. It was suggested this item be placed on the agenda; in the meantime Councilmembers are to work together to try and come up with ways to shorten the meetings. Agenda Item #11-A, Discussion: Mid-Year Review (10:15 p.m.) The Mid-Year Review was discussed as follows: Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 16 Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead led the discussions on the Capital Improvements Projects as outlined in the Mid-Year Review information packet. City Manger Curtis Hawk presented the Mid-Year budget considerations, noting he is planning to create a new Department of Engineering. Another issue, is employee benefit enhancements for the next budget year. Director of Finance Lou Ann Heath reviewed the financial report as outlined in the Mid-Year Review. City Manager Curtis Hawk reviewed the calendar for the Traffic Management Bond election. City Manager Curtis Hawk informed Council about Stebbins & Cooper moving out of the building next to the Administration Building and suggested the City lease space for the Economic Development staff as it would be in the same building as the Chamber of Commerce. He stated he will bring this issue forward at the next meeting. Councilmember Edmondson commented on changes that need to be considered for the Sign Ordinance, relating to "open house" signs. She suggested staff look at the Sign Ordinance regarding these types of signs. Councilmembers Fawks and Kendall suggested waiting for a couple of meetings so that other issues can be addressed at the same time. Agenda Item #12, Adjournment (11:00 p.m.) Mayor Rick Stacy adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m. \WP-FILESLMINUTES\CC-MIN-3 -23-99.doc Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 23, 1999 Page 17 City of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 18, 1999 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 739; 1' reading, Authorizing issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas Tax and Waterworks and Sewer System (Limited Pledge) Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999, and resolving other matters incident and relating to the issuance, payment, security, sale and delivery of said Certificates. Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 739 on first reading to issue certificates of obligation for capital improvement projects. Background Information: The FY1998 -99 budget includes a capital projects component that provides cost estimates and projected timing of water, sewer, roadway, drainage and building improvement /construction projects. Estimated project costs for FY1998 -99 are $16,647,593. Attached is a three -page summary of the projects to be funded. Resolution No. 99 -04 was approved by the Council on February 16, 1999. This authorized the publication of a notice in the newspaper of the City's intent to issue certificates of obligation. The certificates are issued by adoption of an ordinance, with the 1st and 2nd readings scheduled for March 23 and April 6, respectively. A public hearing on issuing the certificates is scheduled for April 6. The City would receive funding in May. A copy of the proposed schedule of events is included. The City is issuing certificates of obligation for these projects because the projects are more than the City can fund in one year from current revenues or other sources of funds. There are a number of large water and sewer infrastructure projects in the budget that will provide and improve service throughout the City. The budget also includes improvements to neighborhood street, drainage, and continuation of the neighborhood sewer program. Financial Considerations: Part of the certificates, $7,599,918, is for street and drainage improvements, and to purchase system -wide computer equipment and software to address year 2000 issues. This will be repaid through the City's ad valorem tax rate. These certificates will not affect the FY1998- 99 $.422 tax rate, and it is the City's intent to maintain the tax rate at the same level in the future within the planning parameters of the multi -year ge- Curtis E. Hawk Ordinance No. 739 March 18, 1999 page 2 financial plan. The portion attributable to the drainage improvements, $959,559, may be repaid with revenues from the proposed Southlake Drainage Utility System rather than property taxes. The proposed System was presented to the Council for consideration at the February 23, 1999 Special City Council Meeting. Approximately $7,009,455 is for projects that are part of the City's Impact Fee Study, and the annual debt service for this portion of the certificates will be repaid through collected impact fees. There is $2,038,220 in water and sewer neighborhood projects, which will be repaid through the City's Utility Fund. The remainder, $382,407, will be used for issuance costs as necessary, including accrued interest, 1% underwriter's discount, and bond insurance premium, with any excess remaining after all costs have been paid to be allocated to the projects. Citizen Input/ Board Review: A Public Hearing is scheduled for April 6 with the second reading of the ordinance to issue the certificates. Legal Review: Ed Esquivel with the law firm Fulbright and Jaworski serves as the City's bond counsel, and as such has prepared the Ordinance. Alternatives: In the absence of issuing the certificates, capital projects would be funded on a pay -as- you -go basis. Budgets and the timing of projects would be prioritized based on the amount of revenue projected by fiscal year. Supporting Documents: 1999 Capital Improvement Program Schedule of Events Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Capital Projects listing Ordinance No. 739 Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 739, 1' reading, authorizing the issuance of $17.03 million Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999. Approved for Submittal to City Council: A ' ''y Mina 's Office Fe-- Wi iiI 1 - - � w 5 co 0 w w O w C7 J 0 O 0 w m w H Y a x J w Q Q u) �� el ZH Z c 0 (DO � a Xm m I- WDW 0 2 a (I) Q Z I- W� OW 0 Z O O wir in w U a w J z a Q a ? w� v m o 0 a J m a. ww 2a z�� z m � � 0 a z co w 0 W 2 � R. 0L O 0 74 z <f U.iOz0U 2 o Y o .c a. W W Oft ' ) ; (1 00 °� WZ� W Quo m w O Q z�z li 'li _ w w z w C7 0� DZ cc O W a W W w mW W QQ O Z O W O UDm m p Li z 0 w p - Q 000 0 o OZOI -mZ W O O 5 m U O U 0 O M 0 ; 0 < W � ZU g Z Z Z z 00 wCe 0 ` 0 0 0 o Ce p D C.) (n a L.L. to cA cn Y Z `w W W w Z 0 ;0 p 0 0 Q H W Q) 0 _ 003 Q � 0 0 0 v o oM0 0 0 0 v 0004:D0,-000000 .- 0 000 N O v =0 0 U) 0 0 0 C° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 co w m o O o C° o (0 a 00 d o oe Ln Ln v_ O C° v_ 1 0 o C° 0 0 CO 0 } 000 E N O M N O o0 O (0 a �n v N f ui c0 I.. O Oi O LC) O O T to O � v I N = 4 c° c0 v N N �" O C) v c0 0 O c0 c0 0 C° 0 0 (0 0 V 4 W u,.- N N v r er M r N r N l f� fA r uv O 69 C° CD r N M r N Z �, f fR W IA ��' . tR ER W A W W W W r -,,EA W. - r W W W. fA E9 b (7) , AI 4 Q W n = a ce- N F a_ i C r w co vi °) C W (n I- D O cn Q lL m o a LL Z Q = J w >-> Z m- W <2z -1-0 0 0> w pi W O z Y w li a. Q Q x Yu) xZ oU 1- 0 W 1- mb Z m w J 0 N Ce ET_ Z u.) o 00-010`-' Q g z w w Q u,..<- Y z o m UQ 0 z 0 =U00� ~((n I- Z 1— o ago m Y z 0 CT) C N W _ u_ O m U J 0 z W - _ Q rem2=J W C- W Z� .,tH W a )- z H ommo Q U rQ W w p 1.- • CO Z = W W > VO F ' 2 Nct2 - Zww 1- m O W O (n(n > W V 0 *IL0 0 u (I) cc < Q -. ml mO W _i M ml- <wWM ZD ,,,i--1-- V es 1-00 lih lifl MzMZZF "ppOP >Q J W W Q 1- J W 2 W .� � W Z O W f- O W M Z = Q W w Z Z U w m v cL ? (ntnt O - V wo aY a Q Y U W X H O z W 4 J 2 Z U Z Q M 2 2 W O E c J u.o I'W0W O z J >Z00NJWec 1.. W JQO Z Z <Ce ��ww�I- W ZpCL OIX JO � W QYO a >' O a.% 2 m -U y Z H Wt W - W�OZW� }} J I J i 3 a -3V ZJ Q wW W W W W < WMQZQ0 W 1Y Y > _ I _ 1 - < pm O Zwm 1- 3 > >> - f- 1 7 -17 •Z o� a D M ap O WON; WOOo3�-eo O < NNN`r? w >b -0< O OJ m n. 20a 1- cn0(n (nQprJr 1- 3 NrrrrZ Q.F -NpV)0 1"' rev) izl- r N M vLo( I, 00 O O r N M at LO CO r- 00 O O r N M at cO CO ti CO O 0 r N M v LO � CO O M M M M M M CO I M M M M c- N N N N N N N N N N LL 0 u) Q g (7- 3 CO 0 c W co D Z j X o w W M CO (nN N W J F W - N cc co v� �0 F o) ��� w0 HHIW- Fa0 Z1.-. U M0= d — _ � W W W I-U w W W W 2� J c > ¢ O mQC m ap � (-)222 aa a � Q co o 2 1- a 0 W C1) wO 1-W000 O a 0 a 7CC~ (o �F- W Z V O z 3 HC7 �' Z Z Z W Z W W W W Z W v Li O. to Z U Z o 0° 5 W°°° ° Z O 2° � w 0 w `° z 0 u) < 0 w 0 0 0 ° co cc a 2 0 C Z 7 W ° Q W a) of < O co a0 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O u) O O N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t70 c0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Of ; u) 0 0 I. 0 0 c) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO Cr 0 CD CO a) } O N- C() 0 CO r O co 0 O O 0 0 N CO u) 0 CO 1 () 0 0 CO 0 CO O O 0 ct u) et (O u7 M M 0) O u) O O N. et 0 aO O O O u) O u) Fs 'f a0 O h N CO O u) O 00 O O) O O O N ti N- u) u) 1." w 0 } 0 nt '1) x-- 1.- M 0 CD 0 u) M (D u) M LO M) 0 •-• u) r- O co r- N_ 14) e- h .- M 0) 0 M et N } Z a) LL (A. 69 69690 690 EA 6969ER M '� d A 4(R �69�E�6969��4,4, �� ERfAEiT LL O r 69 69 to • 2 W ~ L1 . . Y V— O a a w co O w z W a a) �. m a w W fl O ; N 0 a z /- O u) Y 0 0 CO V Q J 1- J ° O. 2 w 0 0 cc v 0 a. 1 ' 0 Q O ? U d v Q w W W J 0 Z CO 1— o ? = o o ° c~i 0 a�W o QQ w a UQ U(n O O O < O W Et 71 �o dbh w z Z D w z w 0 0 � a 0 a 0 0 W CO CO W W > CO 0 000 0 0 0 i_ cn O 0< 0z v = i 0 z tX Mz w � IWOOD ZZ OQ(n ' D > W O zz O Z O a 3 Q� O O m pF -w W ma - O(n - w -ZEt1-UI- ww2 (W W I - CD W (1)4C H� } NQ 8 (/)D(A a' g Q <i‹ wa w- N I U - Z iW -_I Q 0wmw ° � O , _ °~w I- CO w Wa- Wo U w< OD Z Il_ co 3 U > ° = Z W Q w ( P O a i. UU UU -W W J Z >O�pQpmJY0 0 Q wZWZwccOc w Q°� w � m wix< I-- �Zwg,O ° � °j -5 0U ) ° ° O W�WCLZ J(n °ZUO _ w Z 1 'm �O ou_ m w - � - _C) . 0O0W> -J O U O Y 2 0 0 m O,- t O W Q ' 0 W Z W W w 00<< 0=00 < • m a •U 12 M D= a 0 w= l- D > O Y Z ° Q S O W W W 2 CC 0 0 0 0 a O �25uiY(n U(n waU Z F- z U (nm g 0z(n2 }00(n 00(i) . _ _ N M o N M tt u) CO t` CO CO 0 v- N M u) CD ti to 0) O N M scr u) CO CO 0) 0 N M O m Nt Tr V ct Nr 'd' Vt u) U) u) u) u) u) u) u) N u) CO CD CO CO (O CO CO CO (D (D N- t- 1` I� N r 0 CO) Q F e. - I" I 1 W Q < < x N N GO ai re ca = Z z z rn I-- Z Z a N Q z z z %) Q O m m m 1 J Z Z Z 0 Y I- 'e Z O *a 05 o W a 0 w w w N 0 0 a IL 1 1 Z Q Q Q P Z Q 0 0 0 W W 1 a0 a oo in 0 "0 0 a 0)100 0, M `0000000) 0, N 0 CO 1 O 0 0 M IA to N Cr) 10 0) 0 if) 11) fR 0 0 0 10 a) } O CD M M ' i M 0 0 O M lt N O 1n 10 O N 0 0 10 b Oi O) r 1O 1) O 0 C) 00 00 O ti 14) CD O O O G ) 1 N O O) ti (70 er 0 1+) CO 1() 0 0 V) 10 >_ W Z LL � GH 1 N ( D v.) M CO a 10 0 0 CD O CC ' N 0) H 40 141 (. 1 N N {A tD M 6R 69 fA N y Z 4. 4 44 iN 44 1 W • 0 — LL ; W 1-- • ce 0 M M a c C — a) C cm N co • c W I- 0 O1- W H a ce V a W O w 2 a Q w Y 0 W Q J w i CD cc u 2( a o , = z m z-) a(n0) 0 W = Z O I- ~ o (n w U Q W w c4 ¢ O 0 m O w Z w w iH W w w co Q W n. co Ll_ LC_ Q H H H Z H Q W J w 0 z 3 WU U mw J Q W } W J (/) O w rzI W Q aJ mw N � Z SYa Z Z (nom adW y Wa y >. �> z . c x <= W 1- �C7 � � U Q' } }} V (Oa - oa . < O m d W J w = J a V Z J Q 1 Q (/)E 0 Zix zQ N O 000 0 W W W O.O w 2 W O ~OJJ Z (O W W q ix F-H1- cc JJO ZSQS w o w J 3 D - - ' + Ice J z0 J Q1Q a ZQw Z a � Z O_ p F 5 2 V _, i- H za a_ a 1-. c g gQ ctQZ �F a - cn F d SS O WO O O 1- I U i co ( = !) � 1-0 D U >00 > a O a, O r N (h 1!) CD izi r - N ch co I` co O O(0 N Cr) V' (1') CD I` CO 0) 0 0) N (Y) T1 (l) co r- 0) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N- h N- I-- co oo co co co co Cp co co oo CA O O O CA a) a) O) O O) .- ,_ e - ,_ a-- LL O co Q FC - 5 City of Southlake, Texas • and Southlake Park Development Corporation (SPDC) 1999 Capital Improvement Proaram i1M.seisti it my d s.wonrae cometaee et oa.rwr. Seam 1St" forty peml• a of iseYre -Conlikows e1 C eaaetlee. Santis 1111011-111 (79. Caged In p rommaa Pu. .es) 3, •_ Pot Oewee films Grpenolon - leer Tax Miwwe Soma. Same 11 Pr000ssd Seh.duls of Events Complete �_ Ds Event 25.1 -99 Megdy Regular STOC Sovrd Magiive SPDC Approvs Resebdoe Declaring leansi a le Uadweake Project sad Calling for a Public Hesriag en the Project (Notice m u s t be published : S days before hese* and allow for a 50 Nay pennon process) 14- Feb-99 Sneezy Publication of Notice of Public Heurmg on SPDC Project 16-Feb-99 Twain Regular City Ceaaal M City Approves RareltdesdAsaiaei = Notice oflameIreism Certificates of Oblipdsa.Ssrile 1999 City Approve Resel.tie. to Aatlerias Notice of anent is twee Certificates of Obfaptise. Sons. 1999 -8 la-Feb-99 Monday First Publication of Noacc of bate[ to issue Ccr fic ics Jf Obligaton. Sews 1999 First Publication of Nonce of Iowa na Lague Certtcatrs of Obligation. Series 1999 -8 25 -Feb-99 Thursday Second Publication of Nonce of keen to Issue Catifcates of Obligation. Series 1999 Second Publication of Notice of latmtto bate Certificates of Obligation. Series 1999.3 16-Mar -99 Tuesday Regular Gtr Colwell Maass 1st Readies of Or te laces Certificate of Obligatio.. Series 1999 lot Readies of Ordinance to Woe Certificates of Obligation. Series 1/99 -8 6-Apr -99 Tuee Soecial SPDC Board Meeting Public Hearin as Project SPDC Approves RseluOo. Antlorisiag the lawaace of tie Sale Tax Reves.e Bonds. Series 1999 Signing of the Bond Purchase Assume* — Regular Gtr Coeval Meeting - 2nd Ratifies of Ordiaaaa' to Rees _ Certificate of Obligation, Series 1999 City Approve Ordinance Authorities the banana of the Certificate of Obligaioos. Series 1999 tad Reading of Ordiu.ce to Issue Certificates of Obliptios, Series 1999 -8 9 City Approve Ordkaace Ant -orit .$ tie kesace of the Certificates of Obl'tptM., Series 1999-8 - City Approves Resection Approvbg the lemace oaths SPDC Saks Tax Revenge Bonds. Series 1999 Signing of the Cacf1care Purchase Agrecme>rts 9- Apr -99 Friday Aaarney General Approves Certificate sod Band Saks 27 Apr Tuesday 4 - May Teesdry Closing of Debt Issues and Delivery of New Money Foods to Cary sod SPDC °1 8oY arms indicate feed Clay Cwal mad SPDC Board active. • I - ,r- Rn^ed br rot !niece impor - / City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 18, 1999 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 740, 1'` Reading, Authorizing the Issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Tax and Tax Increment Surplus Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999 Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 740 on ls` reading to issue certificates of obligation for the first phase of the Town Hall project within the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone. Background Information: The agreement for architectural services and construction management services for the Town Hall project were recently approved by the City Council. The total for both of these agreements is $2.7 million ($1.2 million for the architectural services, $390,000 for the construction management fee and $1.11 million for the general conditions fee for construction management). An additional $800,000 is included for infrastructure and to provide funding to initiate the phased construction of the project. The par amount of the certificates is proposed at $3.61 million, of which $110,000 is for accrued interest, issuance costs, underwriter's discount and bond insurance premium. The Council approved Resolution No. 99 -08 on February 16, 1999 establishing a maximum dollar amount for the certificates at $3.61 million. The certificates are issued and approved by the adoption of an ordinance, with the 1st and 2nd readings scheduled for March 23 and April 6, respectively. The City would receive funding in May. A copy of the proposed schedule of events is included. Financial Considerations: The certificates of obligation will be issued with a dedicated pledge of accumulated tax increment reinvestment zone revenues, and a backup pledge of the City's property tax. The repayment of the certificates will be structured such that interest only would be paid for the first few years, minimizing the initial outlays required. The reinvestment zone was created effective January 1, 1997, meaning that date is the baseline for the values within the zone. City, county, hospital district, and junior college district property taxes collected on the increment values after that date are dedicated to the zone, and will be used to fund the Town Hall and other infrastructure improvements within the zone. Curtis E. Hawk Ordinance No. 740 March 18, 1999 Ige 2 Citizen Input/ Board Review: A Public Hearing is scheduled for April 6 with the second reading of the ordinance to issue the certificates. Legal Review: Ed Esquivel with the law firm Fulbright and Jaworski serves as the City's bond counsel, and as such, has prepared the Resolution. Alternatives: None available other than pay -as- you -go within the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone. Supporting Documents: 1999 Capital Improvement Program Schedule of Events Ordinance No. 740 Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 740, 1' reading, issuing combination Tax, and Tax Increment Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999. Approved for Submittal to City Council: anager's Office 8�ra City of Southlake, Texas • and Southlake Park Development Corporation (SPDC) 1999 Capital Improvement Proaram 1) cu w s..rlri..eesa.b. w ott.p.r. Srrs till (C11y Caveat wyn'sntwtt Pregar•esl tl utg •r tlaw.... hr.l ese ef c .- lame im a fTi c..set an.r..seeses h.aleesl 3 ) •eeili is Pre D. a-agesa j* C.Mar.IW.. Sales Tax Ravenue Bros. Urns IMO Proposed Schedule of Events Campine a' Dn Event 25-1e99 My R.tnlar SPOC S..rd Mason SPOC Approves Rael.tio. Declaring Iabads b Undertake Probes esd Calling for a Public Hoarier on ti. Pnj.et (Nonce must be published l5 days before berm and 'Bow for a 50 by penacn process) 14 -Feb-99 Surds-, ?- ablicanot of Nonce of Public Hearin on SPDC Project I6Fob99 T.esday Reviler are Council Mtn City Approves R.adedo. to Asthenia. Nads Okra* b hose Certificates .(0.d.., Ss 1399 Cty Approve Rasoistirio t o Anchorite Meekest b bees Certificates of Ob6ptioe. Sorbs 19994 IV-Feb-99 Thursday First Publication of Nonce of bstsat to Issue lerica Fast A.blicancn of Nonce of Intent to Issue Cx:ncates of Obliganoo. Series 1999 -8 25- Feb -99 Tbrsd.y Second Publication of Notice absent to Lime Certificaw of Obligation. Series 1999 Second Publication of Notice of Intents) Issue Cemficares of Obligstioa, Series 1999-B 16-Mar -99 Tuesday Re:•Iar C tv Co..al Mende[ 1st Reading of Or to Rase Certificates of Obli atio., Series 1999 1st Reading of Ordinance to Iswo Certificates of Obligation, Series 1999 -B 6- Timidity Special SPDC Board Met:tiog Public Hearing to Project SPDC Approve Resobtio. Autberisi.g tar lmaac, of tit Sales Tax Reve..e Bonds. Series 1333 Signing of the Bood Ptacbase Apemen[ Render Cry Costal Kieft 2nd Rsadl.g of Ordinance be been Certificate of ObUptlo., Series 1999 City Approve Ordiaasee Authorizing the Imaace of the Certificate of Obligatioa. Series 1999 2nd Reading of Ordinance to byte Certificates of Ofdipdoo. Series 1399 -11 .3 • City Approves Ordina.a Aadrriaier the lesaeso(tie Certificates ofObUptio,. Series 1333 -5 - Cty Approves Resoi.tio. Approving tit bless of tit SPDC Sales Tax Reefs.. Beach. Sark 1333 Signing of the Caret:eate Purchase Agreement 9- Apr -99 Friday Acomey General Approves Certificates and Hood Sales 27 -4-99 Tuesday *May -99 Toesd.y Costing of Debt issues and Delivery of New Moony Funds to City and SPDC A1 11.111 amore beam Uet..1 Clay Cestw1 sad SPDC Beard action. For Sindount ..r GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended February 28,1999 with comparative actual amounts for the period ended February 28, 1998 (fiscal month 5 - 41.67%) Adopted Percent Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1998/99 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ RF.VF.N1 JF.S 2/28/99 1998/99 Budget ‚ ‚ s . 1 2/28/98 9/30/98 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $1,116,945 $5,566,171 $6,463,540 86.1% $3,563,568 $3,970,964 89.7% Sales Tax 313,831 1,020,570 3,026,050 33.7% 861,136 2,521,965 34.1% Franchise Fees 265,577 778,408 984,112 79.1% 580,795 883,871 65.7% Fines 54,556 281,519 875,798 32.1% 248,376 630,645 39.4% Charges for Services 19,980 172,398 685,006 25.2% 152,604 590,950 25.8% Permits /Fees 204,120 864,852 2,742,788 31.5% 944,333 2,733,934 34.5% Miscellaneous 26,639 83,484 145,659 57.3% 37,053 278,573 13.3% Interest Income 19.621 69.807 190.004 36.7% 54.773 178.867 30.6% Total Revenues $2,021,270 $8,837,209 $15,112,953 58.5% $6,442,638 $11,789,769 54.6% FXPFNDITT JRF S City Secretary $18,699 $103,946 $301,173 34.5% $85,474 $226,793 37.7% City Manager 25,002 134,364 351,003 38.3% 130,150 338,110 0.0% Support Services 105.080 612 645 2.526.534 24.2% 619.412 1,498,707 41.3% General Government Total 148.780 850.955 3,178.710 26.8% 835.056 2,063,610 40.5% Human Resources 13.306 76.285 209.600 36.4% 80.121 233.923 34.3% Human Resources Total 1 306 76,285 209,600 36.4% 80,121 233.923 34.3% Finance 48,155 202,556 454,166 44.6% 162,750 399,334 40.8% Municipal Court 26,631 126,026 304,770 41.4% 103,749 267,311 38.8% Municipal Court-Teen Court 5_446 44.957 92.633 48.5% 21.052 59.586 35.3% Finance Total 79.813 373.538 851.569 43.9% 287.551 726,231 39.6% Fire 106,976 647,965 1,857,825 34.9% 697,783 1,784,478 39.1% Police 283,102 1,267,210 3,418,246 37.1% 1,097,897 2,822,719 38.9% Public Safety Support 61,883 434,998 1,056,436 41.2% 379,151 1,004,557 37.7% )wilding 45.061 302,302 692.896 43.6% 209.234 567.051 36.9% Public Safety Total 497.021 2,652,475 7.025,403 37.8% 2,384,065 6.178.805 38.6% Streets /Drainage 45,540 293,039 939,167 31.2% 289,028 820,722 35.2% Public Works Administration 49.997 269.792 803.729 33.6% 312.195 783.368 39.9% Public Works Total 95,537 562.831 1,742,896 32.3% 601,2 73 1.604.090 37.5% Community Development 36,937 213,971 531,480 40.3% 180,785 489,319 36.9% Economic Development 6322 35,361 144.832 24.4% 36.689 116.773 31.4% Community Development Total 43.270 249.332 476.312 36.9% 217,474 606,092 35.9% Community Services 23,194 148,323 416,831 35.6% 145,703 342,198 42.6% Parks and Recreation 81,309 407,884 1,454,991 28.0% 390,474 1,154,334 33.8% Library Services 5.725 30.575 162.480 18.8% 0 0 0.0% Community Services Total 110.228 586.782 2,034,302 28.8% 536,177 1.496 532 35.8% Total Expenditures $987.977 55. 352,199 515.718.792 34.0% 54,941.667 $12.909,283 38.3% Excess (deficiency) of Revenue over Expenditures $1,033,293 $3,485,011 ($605,839) 51,500,971 ($1,119,514) OTHER FINANCING SOTJRCFS AND (IJSF.S) Proceeds from lease /CO (net) $0 $0 $694,300 $0 $718,433 Transfer In -Other Funds 65,461 327,303 1,235,527 295,363 715,869 Transfer To -Other Funds (96.3291 (481.643) (1.155.9421 4 (53.869) Total Other Sources /(Uses) ($30,868) ($154,340) $773,885 $295,363 $1,380,433 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues /other sources over Exp. $1.002.425 $3.330.671 $168.046 $1.796.334 $260.919 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $2,858,521 $2,858,521 $2,597,602 Change in reserved fund balance $0 $0 $0 ENDING FUND BALANCE $6.189.192 $3.026.567 $2.858.521 fund balance percentage 19.3% 22.1% 41, WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended February 28, 1999 and February 28, 1998 (fiscal month 5 - 41.67%) Adopted Percent Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1998/99 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVFNI TES 2/28/99 1998/99 Bndlet . •: •' - s 2/28/98 9/30/98 Expended Water Sales - residential $315,544 $1,935,377 $5,220,000 37.1% $1,694,860 $6,053,989 28.0% Water Sales - commercial 73,451 321,707 805,500 39.9% 306,226 846,277 36.2% Sewer Sales 93,352 469,609 975,000 48.2% 384,354 1,037,099 37.1% Sanitation Sales 57,691 280,830 636,000 44.2% 255,582 635,055 40.2% Other utility charges 36,121 147,453 443,315 33.3% 156,428 409,582 38.2% Miscellaneous 1,156 6,501 83,400 7.8% 16,673 167,494 10.0% Interest Income 10.834 53.460 100.000 53.5% 27.940 89.325 31.3% Total Revenues $588,150 $3,214,937 $8,263,215 38.9% $2,842,063 $9,238,821 30.8% EXPENSES Water $196,418 $970,538 $4,504,340 21.5% $1,098,949 $4,965,046 22.1% Utility Billing 15,817 98,079 303,421 32.3% - - 0.0% Sewer 52,769 300,352 747,246 40.2% 276,168 932,115 29.6% Sanitation 44,727 177,104 560,000 31.6% 159,743 496,147 32.2% Debt Service - Revenue Bonds 293.645 1.203.148 2.121.141 56.7% 958.979 1.943.566 49.3% Total Expenses $603,376 $2,749,221 $8,236,148 33.4% $2,493,839 $8,336,874 29.9% Excess (deficiency) of Revenue over Expenses ($15.226) $465.716 $27.067 $348.224 $901.947 OTHER FINANCING SOT JRCFS AND (TJSFS) Transfer In -Other Funds $0 50 $0 $347,560 $834,145 Transfer Out -Other Funds (65.461) (327.303) (785.527) (294.667) (700,000) Total Other Sources /(Uses) ($65,461) ($327.303) ($785,527) $52,893 $134,145 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues and other sources over Expenses ($80.687) $138.413 ($758.460) $401.117 $1.036.092 1.1 /3 - 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1% SALES TAX REPORT 998 -99 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $3.021.050 $1.219.552 $1.801.498 59.63% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR % Inc YEAR % Inc YEAR % Inc MONTH 96 -97 -Dec 97 -98 -Dec 98 -99 -Dec October $161,892 25.8% $237,164 46.5% $310,767 31.0% November 135,367 21.0% 193,664 43.1% 206,887 6.8% December 115,084 10.7% 163,871 42.4% 188,493 15.0% January 198,873 41.7% 266,437 34.0% 313,831 17.8% February 125,671 31.9% 168,914 34.4% 199,573 18.2% March 104,733 1.5% 160,147 52.9% - n/a April 182,384 33.1% 215,299 18.0% - n/a May 152,577 39.5% 217,760 42.7% - n/a 171,813 53.0% 200,233 16.5% - n/a July 223,854 24.5% 274,072 22.4% - n/a August 184,851 39.7% 224,126 21.2% - n/a September 173.917 42.0% 200.169 15.1% _ n/a TOTAL $1,931,017 30.8% $2,521,857 30.6% $1,219,552 18.4% Actual Budget Actual Estimated (budget -est.) % Month 1997 -98 1998 -99 1998 -99 1998 -99 Difference Change October $ 237,164 $ 284,122 $ 310,767 $ 310,767 $ 26,645 9.38% November 193,664 232,009 206,887 206,887 (25,122) - 10.83% December 163,871 196,317 188,493 188,493 (7,824) - 3.99% January 266,437 319,192 313,831 313,831 (5,361) - 1.68% February 168,914 202,359 199,573 199,573 (2,786) - 1.38% March 160,147 191,856 - 191,856 - 0.00% April 215,299 257,928 - 257,928 - 0.00% May 217,760 260,876 - 260,876 - 0.00% June 200,233 239,879 - 239,879 - 0.00% July 274,072 328,338 - 328,338 - 0.00% August 224,126 268,503 - 268,503 - 0.00% September 200.169 239.669 = 239.669 - 0.00% $ 2,521,856 $ 3,021,050 $ 1,219,552 $ 3,006,603 $ (14,448) -0.48% 19.22% 3/11/99 SLSTX99.XLS 446'10 l SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1/2% SALES TAX REPORT 998-99 collected budget balance budget to date balance lament $1,510.525 $609,776 $900.749 59.63% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR % Inc YEAR % Inc YEAR % Inc MONTH 96 -97 -Dec 97 -98 -Dec 98 -99 -Dec - October $80,946 25.8% $118,582 46.5% $155,384 31.0% November 67,684 21.0% 96,832 43.1% 103,444 6.8% December 57,542 10.7% 81,935 42.4% 94,247 15.0% January 99,437 41.7% 133,219 34.0% 156,915 17.8% February 62,836 31.9% 84,457 34.4% 99,787 18.2% March 52,366 1.5% 80,074 52.9% - n/a April 91,192 33.1% 107,650 18.0% - n/a May 76,289 39.5% 108,880 42.7% - n/a 85,906 53.0% ;00, H7 7 16.5 io - nla July 111,927 24.5% 137,036 22.4% - n/a August 92,426 39.7% 112,063 21.2% - n/a September 86 958 42.0% 100.085 15.1% - n/a TOTAL $965,508 30.8% $1,260,929 30.6% $609,776 18.4% Actual Budget Actual Estimated (budget -est.) 1997 -98 1998 -99 1998 -99 ' 1998 -99 Difference Change October $ 118,582 $ 142,061 $ 155,384 $ 155,384 $ 13,322 9.38% November 96,832 116,005 103,444 103,444 (12,561) - 10.83% December 81,936 98,159 94,247 94,247 (3,912) - 3.99% January 133,219 159,596 156,915 156,915 (2,680) - 1.68% February 84,457 101,179 99,787 99,787 (1,393) - 1.38% March 80,074 95,928 - 95,928 - 0.00% April 107,650 128,964 - 128,964 - 0.00% May 108,880 130,438 - 130,438 - 0.00% June 100,117 119,940 - 119,940 - 0.00% July 137,036 164,169 - 164,169 - 0.00% August 112,063 134,251 - 134,251 - 0.00% Imber 100,085 119.835 - 119.835 - 0.00% $ 1,260,928 $ 1,510,525 $ 609,776 $ 1,503,301 $ (7,224) - 0.48% 19.79% 19.22% SLSTX99.XLS liog-// SOUTHLAKE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT 1/2% SALES TAX REPORT 1998 -99 Collected Budget Balance Budget to Date Balance Percent $1.438.525 $554.247 $884.278 61.47% Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Dollar Percent 1997 -98 1998 -99 Increase/ Increase/ MONTH Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) October $ - $ 125,207 125,207 100.0% November - 92,367 92,367 100.0% December - 102,325 102,325 100.0% January - 135,618 135,618 100.0% February - 98,730 98,730 100.0% March - - n/a n/a April - - n/a n/a May 77,337 - n/a n/a June 86,019 - n/a n/a July 108,531 - n/a n/a August 105,651 - n/a n/a September 89 96 - n/a n/a TOTAL $467,504 $554,247 $554,247 n/a Budget Actual Estimated (budget -est.) % 1998 -99 1998 -99 1998 -99 Difference Change October $ 135,242 $ 125,207 $ 125,207 $ (10,035) -7.42% November 110,437 92,367 92,367 (18,070) - 16.36% December 93,447 102,325 102,325 8,878 9.50% January 151,935 135,618 135,618 (16,317) - 10.74% February 96,323 98,730 98,730 2,407 2.50% March 91,324 - 91,324 - 0.00% April 122,774 - 122,774 - 0.00% May 124,177 - 124,177 - 0.00% June 114,182 - 114,182 - 0.00% July 156,289 - 156,289 - 0.00% August 127,807 - 127,807 - 0.00% September 114,588 = 114.588 - 0.00% $ 1,438,525 $ 554,247 $ 1,405,388 $ (33,137) -2.30% 4/6 -/a City of Southlake Comparison of SPDC Sales Tax and Crime Control Sales Tax (Both 1/2 cent Sales Tax) Crime Dollar Percentage Month SPDC Control Difference Difference May -98 $ 108,880 $ 77,337 $ 31,543 28.97% Jun -98 $ 100,117 $ 86,019 $ 14,098 14.08% Jul-98 $ 137,036 $ 108,531 $ 28,505 20.80% Aug -98 $ 112,063 $ 105,651 $ 6,412 5.72% Sep -98 $ 100,085 $ 89,966 $ 10,119 10.11% Oct -98 $155,384 $ 125,207 $ 30,177 19.42% Nov -98 $ 103,444 $ 92,367 $ 11,077 10.71% Dec -98 $ 94,247 $ 102,325 $ (8,078) -8.57% Jan -99 $ 156,915 $ 135,618 $ 21,297 13.57% Feb -99 $ 99.787 $ 98.730 $ 1.057 1.06% Total $ 1,068,170 $ 923,021 $ 145,149 13.59% / / 3 "13 F an g orn Environmental Consultation Frank Powell R.S. Texas Registration # 3115 TNRCC Site Evaluator # 0S4762 P.O. Box 272 Copeville Texas, 75121 972- 843 -0303 Original Report with Design Specifications Uncommon Care N White Chapel Rd Southlake, Texas Presented to Southlake City Council March 23, 1999 OSSF Site Evaluation Report Fangorn Environmental Consultation NAME: Uncommon Care BUILDER : SITE INFORMATION Report No.: 00000095 N. White Chapel Rd., just south of inttrsection with Ravenous., on the west side of rcva SOIL BORri\TG ill DEPTH TEXTURE SOIL DRAINAGE RESTRICTIVE CLASS TEXTURE MOTTLES HORIZON r _______„ , -, ! 1 0-24" ! II i t Loamy Sand ! !none i none 24'4- Ill r Clay , .1 E I 1 nOne 1 ?none , ! i !..... ..... .1 ... r __.... i _._______. ___________________ n , ..; J ■ j SOIL BORING #2 DEPTH TEXTURE SOIL DRAINAGE RESTRICTIVE CLASS TEXTURE MOTTLES HORIZON r • i i I II !Loamy Sand -- 1 !none 1. , 1 - 1 none i , L 1 i 28"+ I III - [Sandy Clay 1 i none i ! none i ! • i ! I 1 L I , : f ---- 1 1 r —-- 1 i ; : t....._ ___.) L i i . 1------- 1 ---- 1 1 -------------- 1 1 ---------- 1 7 t-______..1 1 i 1--- i i____ i SITE FEATURES Large square three acre. lot, with native grass and scattered trees. There is no flood potential, no creeks or ponds. The ' lot slopes downward toward the north and west. The slope is from 3-6%. Public Water supply. Commercial Property. 1 I . 1 1 i .....,-.......‘ ,,,,,, , --- OF T t.v ... -------- • . ,.. - 7 . : . OBSERVATIONS: Professional Design Required signed 7 * 4,1_ Pa-weff_ 12 date f - 1 b (II: . •-. f i 1 RANK POWELL . of‘e . .. page 2 of 2 31 1 5 I ■ A. ''''-- G/S T eFk .4 Permit # Fangorn Environmental Consultation Frank Powell R.S. Texas Professional Sanitarian Registration #3115 TNRCC Site Evaluator Registration #0S4762 P.O. Box 272 Copeville, Texas 75121 Ott` 972 - 843 -0303 Pager 214 - 836 -8I90 Fax 972 - 843 -6007 Drip Emitter Irrigation Design Customer Name: Uncommon Care Builder: Address: N. White Chapel Lane County: Tarrant Subdivisions: City: Southlake Record #: 00095 Design Parameters : Type of Dwelling: Commercial Square Footage: N/A Daily Waste Flow: 3200 Effluent Loading Ratd).20 gal /sq.ft. /day Septic Tank Size: 6800 gallons total Pump Tank Size: 1000 gallon Required Absorption Area: 16000 Design Absorption Area: 16000 Total Length of Piping: 8000 Number of Emitters: 4000 Supply Line Size: 1 1/4" PVC Supply Line Length: 50' -100' Pump Requirements: 0.50 HP Dosing Volume: 300 -500 gallons Check Valve Needed: yes Filter: 100 micron, in line Secondary Treatment: yes Type: aerobic Additional Info: SEE ATTACHED NOTES Designed by: •F TE-Eq `August 30, 1998 ;=RANK POWELL 1 1-13 3115 :Z rti•• Fangorn Environmental Consultation Frank Powell R.S. System Components a) Aerobic Treatment Plant b) check valve c) 100 micron filter d) pressure regulator (15psi to 25psi ) e) chlorinator f) K -Rain mechanical control valve g) 4000 emitters @ 1.0 GPH flow to 1.6 GPH flow System Calculations: a) emitter line required : 8000 linear feet b) emitter spacing : 24" ( typical ) c) emitter sectors : 8 zone la = 12 lines @ 85' zone I b = 12 lines @ 85' zone 2a = 12 lines @ 85' zone 2b = 8 lines @ 121' zone 3a = 11 lines @ 90' zone 3b = 9 lines @ 110' zone 4a = 11 lines @ 90' zone 4b = 14 lines @ 20' -100' d) total number of emitters: 4000 e) emitter flow rate: 1.40 GPH @ 22.5 psi ( generally ) f) total flow : 4000 x 1.40 = 5600 GPH = 5600/60 = 93 GPM g) pumping rate required : 93 GPM / 8 ( # of sectors) = 11.6 GPM h) For one side or building, if a 185 gallon dosing volume were used for an average flow of 1 500 GPD, there would be 8 irrigation cycles per day lasting about 16 minutes each. That would be two cycles per field. Fangorn Environmental Consultation Frank Powell R.S. Uncommon Care attn: Robert Montgomery 3808 Bighorn Trail Plano, Texas 75075 off.: 972- 985 -3219 fax : 972 - 769 -0218 Job Site: N. White Chapel Rd., just south ofRavenaux Southlake Texas 76092 Design Notes: The proposed use of the property will be two 20 bed assisted living units. The TNRCC manual lists 80 GPD (gallons per day) for nursing homes equipped with water saving devices, which gives a total of 3200 GPD or 1600 GPD per unit. Each building will have a 1500 GPD aerobic treatment unit, a 1500 gallon pre - treatment tank and a minimum 1000 gallon pump tank. The added 100 GPD per system should not be any problem because I will be utilizing sub - surface disposal methods, namely drip irrigation. The drip irrigation method will be better suited for the terrain and to go around existing landscaping. Each system will have four drip emitter fields. The fields will be split off a K -Rain distribution valve for rotating the flow between fields. The drip lines will come off a main trunk line and criss cross through the yard and then connect to a return line back to the pre- treatment tank. A valve is to be put at the end of each field connecting the field to the return line. This will enable the maintenance company to flush the line every year, and put the effluent back into the system. The pump float switch will be adjusted to an adequate level below the high water alarm. Since this is sub - surface application and at each cycle of the pump the water is diverted to another segment of the field, the dosing volume may be low allowing the pump to cycle more than once a day. A high water alarm float will be attached in the pump tank in such a way as to allow for one third ofa days use above the alarm float. For Example: if the 1000 gallon tank is 72" in diameter then the radius is 36" and to calculate volume per inch, the following formula is V=3.1416 x 36 x 1 = 4071 cu. in. there is 231 cu in. per gal., dividing yields 4071/231 = 17.6 gal. per inch The float would need to be placed 30 inches below the inlet to the pump tank to maintain a 528 gallon capacity above the alarm. The maintenance contract would need to be in effect for the aerobic treatment and drip irrigation. Because of the nature of the use of the property, I would recommend that chlorine be used continuously in the system even though it is not surface irrigation. The state does not require tests ( BOD, TSS, and Chlorine residual) for sub - surface application, however, due to the nature of the facility, I would recommend a chlorine residual test at each site visit under the maintenance agreement, three per year, and put on the report to the authorized agent. SO DRIA • 1..n. MO ‘_ _-• _....„,-. II . 1 1 1 l ..."''..'" \ i c) ... N 0Q1'41 E 1 , / /2 315.64' A. x 1 ....;'''. . - al , ,•,-°. 1 1 i I I R I I 1 a l• --., sY 1- I / ,, • * • '4, 4,, 1 — ---- i g I • -Nr-- I / . Si--. / I . ; '`.• "- / 1*rio Int 'a .' 111 1-,, \ ' : , le., - l - 1 \ \ \ n ..I,, '4. tt. 0 0 "13.=-. a 1 1 I i E \ '', •s- ,,, 1, I 1 \ 1 • s 's \ 4'. \\\\ \ \ 1 z 1 . ".q .. o ti I \ 7,% , , ..". h , 1 . 1 \ '` ) r ---- 1 1 MI 1 l OA i . A l \ 4 c:, ., ., , % a • i 1 .,-;;:-....i.N s I `1. 1 . r------ — . ---- s • --- ' " 1.. I \ ,, 4 4 it, s 1—---11 r ------ 1,-• • ...- —4,— . _ 1 iTI -a < i 3 , . ,..r. ,,, ,,- \\ • r % r e. . , .:..•0 . : \ ''' ; • I / N .1. v. 1 2 rt i T'e- IS "" • \ ..•: c--". \ \,.( \\ '4. T.Z... .,- ii \......, \ / . ., • S, h3cr •- I A S Pu,o :. \ I oi, . 1 ...,...'' ■ , ▪ , \ \ I S 7,, \ ••,. . • -.-* ..-. c.o \ / 1 <\ \ ,..... / ..17''''' I. . \ \ 'c:6 %, , n ,-- ..q... N ; 4. ... . . , . . _. . s --..,Th ' ic \ 4 a \ \ . \ \ \ 1 ____ __---- \ _ , , \ i 1111 i 4. % ..t. ........--..------ ' "' \< F OP \ -,,,,. / \ ,....„ 1 x , `4 1 \ .. \ ' . 8 ` . \ ' "'ir '''s \ -",•,,,, \\,.. 1 ••••i- ;.. .,.. \ I - .. ' se l•-• " •-•-‘ A ' ■;5_ 1 \ \ 1 3?, % ., . ,,. ?p . \ s G It ,, 1 • \ — - 5 a • 1 \ \ _ a•-• , • \ \\ 1 -•,. ... ; 7 ,--- 1 ‘ , ,.. •• -,, ‘..... •••,, f \ ' — et I, r "1 i \ .31. '' il - '1i. ' _ ___ i I 1 2 --2,— .----\--. - — — - - . \ 1 lq \ \ 11 ;\ i i \ \ 0_ • \ N I 1 _ _ Y,,, \ --\ --- ' it• —..—_ 1 \ I _.,__. _ 5....4 I i 1-, \ • .., \ I. 1 ' - ,— ----- ' 1 ■ x 4 .. __ _ -; . 4:52 )- ' '''' ( 1'1- Y --- - ■ - '..,.---- ---- \ ,._.. _...... Q, i t r r V D',. \li 1:41. W .ic ..E777 4 " 7 p: 7 , - , „ ,-, i; i- t g Y' r \ i r r — — -- -,...\----,-- —.).. PA VING 315.51 1 I 1 A -__ .1 4 4 ....4 1 1 I 1 NORTH WHITE CHAPLE BLVD. i _ O H C Z Z ➢ D D >mo m II° on o ° I II° ��o s m f W E0 2 p 1 a r O moo. 2 A ° `� m i z m '. J _ a � �w,ocrvr�e n y ` - % _ : � ■ C °z 1.- 1 1 ! I g o z IA; Z ' I I o -.svr.ct..Rr A 1 L \ � J 0 \ 1 o - m I C ; � n 1 • //\ ; z i _ it m M - ,, 0 I' 2 Z I I', =!51∎ m I = O _ iI v�� L ■ 5 z Z _ o I ,:r 1 > i ''N �. o ' -i>w� 4 _ 0 1 1 1�I Ai d 0 1 - I Z v 1 f D z SID ir, Q• .� � ° L___ �!i ___ a X / i•�0•i00•i0.0.4.00OOI = 989 , -_, ,-- '''' s '' /.., M -. Al ' ' - ' c o U 0 ^' { ® y a N y L.._ mo_ e.> ,73 0 ,i • ® n x -. ® o ® ° z n °c 5 D Z O Z -, I S ° O ~ A A C • ° x ° O ® . O C A ~ O O A O vi Z - O S A n : ® O i, Zb °o n A ^7 g. m ✓i 10 1, 2 Z ® i m C ��" "i 7 F, iI I m z c l 9 • - . '- - - o 1./f I i BS 1i i o jtj o 111 : E ` o E 91 4 i i 1 .44' S / / L _ I� y- - x � 1100 A � i �00000 �' 111 r 11 n ® 4 • 4 04:- i�i�i�i i� INI m p I II II Lll_ l�� OA i n �������������������� /..' 1 1 ° ° . 0 1111 1 111 r - - g .4 :104�� ;■•■•∎••■•■•4 0.14 INI I I ` r -4 1 A . .:�•�..t��.� ..���.��:.� IP A . A 1 • 1 0 \ \III - � . / _ _ _ m a °V ° ∎ \ e7 Q,-A,,.1 S v ° FmF ° �\ ■ 41 ° Va v ■ .. ° 40 70 v ° c ' O N C € 0 , rn N a w ry 1 . � ' 1 ,o -- ° V '47 v ° p Q o ° • z ' � r j 0 z ,,, ,,,z r_ZO c z, > °G �o omNZ z o z > zZ °v Q �� \ ° 9 °_ ° ° . z!ED mi L0 D O D y C oC r1S x 0 ,O x° n ,Ar 0 „-2 ° x' ,, an -< m 0 a g �-, r-� I Q 0 '1" ( r 1; g ?;-; "-'`,4> i b O ;; E ' 53 ` ^ ; L^ = `-) 5 -2%o - ' m — �°_c° n up �lo ® o, Z m ° K 2 u,. o cc ■ v® o f =:;,,, ��• -' 7i _c �'� >N mom . <�O A OtiZ ® Z Z f� ~ 2 Om z c 201 �T. 4.111 0r- r) O o m I - n N � o -- > ' - s O 0 r"'p to Cz 0 z n r ,. m ,O <-'m 0v, ¢> ° 'i'' 1" 7 <,- -, ° 0 > o c ,a � m n , c g,„ c >o,', z? oZ �2 !'0 , z m z ® i.. Fa �"'!` Z C7 ° r n, rm K C - Z ' Z mom >' "C �- z ° a o.'°o '. V ® <0 0 Zz,�n, y� > zZOy_oz cc -r,> <_, 0 1, o — i " 11 , ", D • m In r Z z n. c7 _, C1 C Z C V i ® ti ,� , v+ O �. � v. v° e m 0 >(:›0- Z ° O A r-o 0 v, < 0 <? > x 'J A < 0 ,A n r, !T C` 1C.,•, t 3P O ol °c ` �' , o� o Z m A Cn 1-- Lt ? z z m m 3 z a ti 0 0 — ! 0 c_ Nc m ..n Z y v -' m A o ; D S o �i L i m I s Im ° ° i O j L0 (i) K _ 1 A 0 1 J r Flush water return to treatment plant Manual or solenoid control valve i1 Flush line i - -emu Is / —°° Compression adapter _ t t i s ; _ t _ WASTEFLOW 2' Driplines ----111*. Vacuum • _ ` Emitters - - —. - breaker Valve box /_ k Header ; ., Ii - 1 line 11 II 1 u Manual or solenoid control valve V acuum breakers laced at high spots ll 1 P 9 P Pressure regulator _} Filt -r Treated effluent intake Typical Subsurface Disposal Field Installation Detail DIAGRAM 1 ▪ RAINBIRD BIRD Xerigation® ell . 1110 40 Emission Devices Oil Landscape Dripline Landscape Dripllne OS Primary Application METRIC M Landscape Dripline is the next generation in pressure M odel Row Spacing Con Length Model Flow Specing Coll Langfh compensating, inline emitter tubing delivering unmatched GPM In. a. nh cm m ell clog - resistance for long term reliability. It can be used to irrigate L0.06 12 -100 .61 12 100 LD 0642-100 23 30,5 305 W-06-12-500 .61 72 500 LD 06 12 -500 2.3 30,5 1524 ground cover, mixed plantings, slope plantings and hedge rows. 7o- 0912100 .92 12 100 LD- 09 -12- 100 3.5 305 305 117- 0912500 .92 12 500 00-09 -12 -500 3.5 305 1524 ell 4 Features W-06-18-100 .61 1r 100 W-06-18-100 2.3 457 305 W * . - 6 78 500 W-06-18-500 23 457 1524 01 •Patented, cylindrical design of the ADI (Advanced Drip Inline) i e . CD -09 18 100 .92 - 18 100 _' L0-09-18-100 as 45.7 30.5 emitter with dual outlet ports eliminates the need to install 0009 -18 -500 .92 18 500 W-0918-500 1 5 45 1524 ell LD -06 -24 -100 .61 24 100 CD- 06- 24100 23 61.0 30.5 :Ef an air relief valve or automatic flush valve on each inline tubing 1.0,--06:271:506,_,J ;.61 24 500 L00524-500 24 -500 2.3 61,0 152.4 IPS zone when tubing is installed at grade and mulched over. LD- 0924100 :92 X 00 L009 -24 -100 3s 01,0 30,5 .2450 LD- 090 ; 1",' 4 ' 24 500 LD -09 -14 -500 3,5 61,0 152,4 U •Pressure compensation ensures consistent flow from each inline emitter throughout the entire length of tubing run. all *Cylindrical shape of the factory installed ADI emitter "welds" to Landscape Dripllne Maximum Lateral Lengths ell the inner circumference of the polyethylene tubing, creating a physical barrier that keeps the emitter securely in place even AflefPreaam► M.ranLaalateralLengtl/Mean ill a yet tt i t when tubing is kinked. . ▪ •Choice of flow rates, spacing and coil lengths provides design ►s * ,- t59 130 • , 222 174 =, ., ;Lta •� -7 ii, a 4' .'14' . ^', in 3 is 859 �`t t -2, b V7'4 - . Xr� , ON flexibility for a variety of non - turfgrass applications. 11 , 1l i Operating Range . i - < „p r .6 LL °i_ >, .0 . - 'i. w:.- ,.W *Pressure: 8 -60 psi (0,6 -4,0 Bars) ell METRIC *Temperature: Up to 100° F (43.3° C) water ell 1 Inlet Pressure Maximum Lateral Length (Meters) Up to 125° F (51.7° C) ambient Bars 30,5 cm 45,7 em 81 a em Nominal Row (I/D): Nominal Flow (7/79: Nominal now M/h : ' •Flow Rates: 0.61 GPH and 0.92 GPH (2,3 I/h and 3,51/h) 7,3 3,5 2,3 3,5 2,3 3,5 I, 0 48,5 396 67.7 53,0 86,3 65,2 •Filtration: 120 -mesh (125- micron) 1 76.8 521 1094 70.4 1393 87.5 IIIII 24 92.7 64 3 1326 88,1 170.1 109.1 Specifications 3.1 104.2 71. 749,0 98.1 191.1 121,6 ea 4.1 119.5 81.7 170,1 111,0 218,2 138,1 •Outside Diameter: 0.630" (16 mm) ell *Inside Diameter: 0.540" (13,7 mm) r. •Wall Thickness: 0.045" (1,1 mm) LD -09. 1-1-70 .• ell I Made! wil Length df Tubing es Land- 100 = 100' Cylindrical Shape , scape (30,5 m) Oil Dripline 500 = 500' (152,4 m) ,, Emitter Spacing ?. ✓ 12 = 12" (30,5 cm) f ell 1 8 = 18" (45,7 cm) CO 24 =24 "(61,0 cm) i O Flaw Rate i 111 ' ell sZ 09-- .91 GPH (2,5 Uh) CZ 09= .92 GPH (3,5 dh) , 41 eli Landscape Dripllne ADI Emitter ell M 136 Xerigation www.rainbird.com 1999 2000 Catalog Ifil fa -.1 1 Ei D - _ D o NORWALK L WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT COMPANY ! SINGULRIR . BICI-KINETIC® WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM 0 it 1 ll 0 Automatically reduces all Enhances property domestic wastewater to a value while clear, odorless liquid in protecting the just 24 hours`" environment , ,(, ii: ,,, „.„,_ , ir , , ,- ik ` . x j 't , .'� r° t gar K Z ' ' f/ , ,.„. G R 0 ' , N RTL /C • Energy efficient C:ri • Automatic operation • Precast concrete tank 0 500 to 1500 gallons per day Ce ",I,ed«, "s " "SFS " Clas.v I .............._ 1 Ezi ANIE2 NOR WALK WASTEWQUIPMENT COMPANY wow THE STATE -OF- THE -ART RIVALS THE PERFORMANCE OF ALTERNATIVE TO THE THE MOST ADVANCED 3 TROUBLESOME SEPTIC TANK... WASTEWATER TREATMENT ll The Singulair plant quietly, efficiently and automatically EQUIPMENT IN THE WORLD... '" treats all incoming wastewater in just twenty -four hours. The Singulair plant is the only onsite wastewater treatment III Incorporating the most upt -to -date technology, the system system performance certified and fully listed by NSF reduces all domestic wastewater to a clear, odorless liquid. International and the Canadian Standards Association. The IIIII The Singulair plant employs the extended aeration process, Singulair system complies with U.S. EPA guidelines and la similar to the treatment method used by most municipal meets all requirements of NSF Standard 40.The entire wastewater treatment facilities. This process involves a system is listed by CSA for safety, reliability and quality. natural, biological breakdown of the organic matter in the These certifications insure that the Singulair system will wastewater. Once complete treatment has been reliably protect you, your family and the environment. accomplished, a stabilized effluent is safely returned to the environment. The Singulair system is a trouble -free answer CONTROL CENTER WITH to wastewater disposal. It contributes to property value TIME CLOCK AUTOMATICALLY is and insures a safe, sanitary home environment. REDUCES OPERATING COSTS... ,,i FLOW EQUALIZED THROUGH Every Singulair aerator is supplied ALL TREATMENT STAGES... - - , . with a prewired electrical control i center for fully automatic operation. P• Flow equalization guarantees adequate retention in each The control center is contained in a treatment stage. Wastewater enters the system and is gasketed, lockable, corrosion equalized within the pretreatment chamber, while anaerobic resistant enclosure for safety and ,,., bacteria and gravity precondition the waste before it flows protection of components and into the aeration chamber. In the aeration chamber, aerobic wiring. Each control center is i'` bacteria convert the waste into stable substances. Flow equipped with a resettable circuit equalization maximizes this biological oxidation and insures breaker, on /off /automatic selector twenty -four hour retention. Following aeration, the liquids switch, red warning light, adjustable �, flow into the clarification chamber where flow equalization time clock and audible alarm. The enhances the settling of biologically active substances. As time clock is factory preset for normal operating conditions, '- the fine particles settle, they are returned to the aeration but can be adjusted byyourfactory- trained Norweco distributor chamber by the Bio- Static sludge return. Only clarified if necessary. The Singulair system has been performance ` liquids enter the final treatment stage, the Bio- Kinetic certified with the aerator operating only 30 minutes per hour. system. This revolutionary device incorporates filtration, Intermittent operation results in direct savings in electrical costs .• settling, non - mechanical flow equalization, optional and longer aerator life. The distributor's name, address and 6., disinfection, adjustable outlet weir and optional telephone number are prominently displayed on the control dechlorination. Throughout all treatment stages, flow center cover. All system controls and necessary owner P"' equalization assures process efficiency and effluent quality. information are conveniently located at your fingertips. .- OPTIONAL BIO- SANITIZER -_� - ��� DISINFECTING TABLETS Specifically formulated for use in the Singulair system, Bio - Sanitizer - " `' tablets provide efficient and reliable disinfection when chlorination is ',724,----"""*"'" desirable. Manufactured from pure calcium hypochlorite, Bio - Sanitizer ! tablets dissolve slowly and evenly, providing effective, economical =3 bacteria killing power. Each tablet contains a minimum of 70 _ available chlorine and can be used to provide positive disinfection ` x when required. Packaged in easily handled and resealable containers, Bio- Sanitizer tablets are available from your local distributor in 4 Ib., "" 25 Ib. and 45 Ib. polyethylene pails or 100 Ib. polyethylene drums. _ - 2 • _ 2- :. _.2I — o ° m = 770 Z Z co 70 D m cn c - 0 5• 1 3 ) C r R o 71 1 0 cn o cn > - m o o° o �, o00079 cD c o c a o a o � (� av 3o 3m* uv < ��_0 sv -0 Wo o y O m 7, _i iI m Z = O v v w n '� fi Z <' c CD °' - v _ o O Q �- cn ul a ■ �° O ° c °a O o O -0 -' c ° - N D °<' O Z C w- E ; < a3o 5- 0c �.o �o - ' cQ v so D cn a) -- 0 w0(1),_(.0,0 ri CI 3 � c 33 7 �o I ��� �`� �Qa � 3 � Z VI a c i o O �, o m c m ilik ° (D m c C C m - n C -O O C `G C 7 O CD CD o cn I XI m iv N � ' n ' Cn CD u CO a (D 3 g' - o n -' j " - .1 m 0 11116, X a (D ...< CD C 0 n • Uli O O CD XI V, m - v -‘.003 O (D = t4 n 4 • �x o tv q j a.�x4 n n (D w'.< C m N O D v ,- CD D O ,. CD Q - 7 C C m • CO m' � ,, CO N - O O r a ..: v v '< CD - o 3 00 w D m » i (7 o a) - O `< o O 3 3 C 3 fl- v i _ r: `° � �, 3,0 0 v ncO Fa � 3' M0a a v / - = m a < w c - '< CO c cn a cQ ° ;, M a W m� m 3 O r I M 9.. d . • •gym zoo Z Q -o mo- * m 4 -O.0?w (D-0 cQpR1 m c o 0 0_,0o -, o 0 < o_o v c a) n) c Ai W v D m cn c (D c Q v (D o sv �. \ a �°= -. C vCV m N Q a < O v w C H• * iii , D -0 6� v w a z + v CD v m c O zs cn CD-0 CD(/) se∎ : ! 1 F 1 = : , // i ., / / < k) � ` { - 5. a c c - v m a o O p m o ° 0 Q- 4 ° cn Q = (D g 0 3 - s CD Z ■ Cn • ' ` _ z O a o ° v� ° m (D o o cnm ° 0- v 3 o 0 m n a) iii D ° v vo � =� cow v : o v m v 0 = m cn 0 a- m 3 k c n 3 Cv 8 Q o 0 c O O o ( � D o ` < ■ ILA! c v c n o . c c o v o . ) Q cn a 3 CO C r a cD <) o k) ...5-s (Q c Q p 0 a o m m m r 7, c m 3 s) (D (Dw • I Cn* = z cQ rn Q a O) � c a W cn < (� -{ cn cn n iv CS - cn - (D a n 0 0 0 0 3 O cn (D -1 W a r (n o1 v O C v Q o ( o 0 03 0 N° o O -p C 0 v O C D CD O o MOM o - O < m C_ r O ° n (DCCnCV 3 , 'p 3 ai - D D mm0 is Z o N c CD m O - O m O C n 3 N o Q • h Q. Q , 3 -° CD O v Q c 7 E3 C ,_ c m _ , m e cn c n 1 1 o (D m O o Q C A D o 3 03- c. O O O 0 3 m v 5 . o Q - a 3 (D co ° � r � cn F-. Q O Da Z O --0 o 3 cn `<- o D Q < v m c n O n° v v v cQ 0 a M ° ° o ° 0 0 3 m a° o n 0 o 0_°(2,_-10 o c cn < c G S C7 (D CD a rm C 0 3 CD a) 0 C N � . O , m XI N o C. o Q D 3 a -° N ` ic .0 � wQO- . Q =QoCa � Q� =.� � El 3. cn n /r O CD n X (� D ( Sv o = - Sv 3 C C (D CD Q v 3 . 7 Cn n) r o C(1) (3 O Cv o a (D 7 v � (D r O O CD Cn — o o C. CD v a Cll c (D o o w N . 0D o v O co Z (D - < ' C C ll 7 v C° o (D a v o a- 0 m Z O C ° ). • Sll 3 . a o a m a s v W . -CV 50 zzm o � aCV ° N v '� (W Sl 0 i m m o v c -4, _. r �� _, c` D " . -, D-D O � o n v = o . y Z -"o ( D 0 J �n 5 te a„ 3 0 N m w .. o — cn cn m vac O a c) (D ° W v cu cn n) ( o o c o 5 . o co o c CD C c - o o o m ° cD 3 o m . 7 O , c O O iv c N o , O c 3-, 3 a v < a m a < 0 C a cD n m o o ; /� a w O a S G N o O m CD - v C O CD N CD CS CO '--. 7 G o v (n (� (CD ° a Y c v . ° ° . m o a t v c � ' ° 3 ccn v m ° v CQ Q m m Z c 0 o c cn cNn v O r '� v -°- ° a m v a< „ C a 0 v 0 ) � ® c c v o cQ - . Eh a w o cn O � <n N 5 O m 3 a 0 Q O fl- o CD 5- a) a v . cn CD 7, 5 a C -0 5- v 5 . CD cn 3= 2 �i m c cn n- -0 a 0 em u) a O m v m n ' > ° vc��'. p v � a ��C <�ovm ° z AO D cf)0 )= 3 �� c5 v ° -4 11 �o a �oQC m r ma- a3Om°-�mv ao3 - m � c ��cQOCO3cnw cNn y 3 c c v sv (73. v cn p C p n sv O O n 07 c �, m p < cn - o - o n - C 3 p a 2 M - (D m o cn -, Cv M m -'° w _ � CD << vi v ' ° -0 CL o ° c m c n c � � 0 o o o 3� c �. m 11 3 c • � � ° O ) O O o '" m o p n < co -, v _. a w p v Cv m y 0 a) cn O cn m c Q v =� ° o ° �� o ° -v ° o O �' X1 0 7 ` D ° CD m � r Z O S o O_ ` a ( T ) � . -0 o CD ( 5 O - -. 0 W Q 0) /w v 0 C D o CD Q . to CD c v n o m °) c o c v c o • cn a a) co v -. v m w < (� m a (/) cQ o < Q) ;4 . - (D (D O- < v Cn - tv Cv - 6 w Cv Sy N Sy n' cn • o cD () N o a 0 G O Q o a w 0 0 0 0 0 ( .- Q 0 (a o o a 0 G O Q G O Z C D , c n o O N C O 5 (D S 0 c h, c - w (7) ° PM CD o w ( CS o 5 ' m ci ° `� ` D0c D m m17 o o0-. -oao(3 o'Z'D a 5 , o m y cn D o o o 3 a 3 c c� -, - n O n (D���Q� = D �, non o� ° Fa -' c , c� M • a: Es (n O 5 v T C o C 7 C Z co El n 3 3 ,.< a C = ^ ° n o o ° c • c c o v o v IL! � m m ° 0 v Cin vD - Z v 5-- (L[,) y vmo0w °mo - 0 g - 0m 9. R . 3v. =vwm� Q �� Pio (D -s C CD 0 (1) c c -I ° O cD ° 3 1 - O Q �' w c 3 0 m a 3 cn o cn 3 c Q' m °) C 0 3 5 sv a ) ° d uoum�++ ° ° Z ° a c ° - O 0 -o 5 - a w m w x o < O C ca a a- o v �� D2 (DV 70� o w � - o P � m7 0 o (3.o( )c � 7om w `� ° � ` 0 _0 a m rn � � -,( /) 0 � �mCVz svzS��m� a� o ��o ��� � - co. 0 a v C x C (D p (D ° 7 4< O CD D D- a Z CD ( D 02, N (D 0 3 0 0 0 (n 0 -0 c 3- 5 O n x co- w w • -I r O cn O CD co n a) (D - 0 `< v - 0 C v Sv O () O n T (D C C C 3 C7 o v a • a C (D o O O C C) O y CD /� < W C 5 E3 5. O o a w C O o ? o N 3 C 7 < .. C V/ (D (D a O cn O p Z Z m CD O CD a G p (Q Q a a (D O Q n C 00 O CD 0 Q - O 0 > CO (D W n v O v (1) R Z < 3 0_, < 3 Q o Cv m a 0' a cn 3 ° ° *o v 3 0.. 7, 3 0 C a *"< 0 p v m = m m v 0 73 a Z a C - cD (D ' a o N '- o c v v - -' C ,--. - 0 (D r. � n cn c m m n� cn O� O� v n o° v 0- (D � o n o c � Z CD 7,h C - C D O Cn Cll Cll C) C '-. CS 3 N O CD (1) 0 ° rrl a) 03 co o o- : -o if) 3 co am- ao 0 0 3 0 � ' v * z - Q cD 0 0 Q (D c. 0 p M __ 3+ • • • • 0 • • 4 _1 o - Co(7' -0 m 0 m 3 Q (Q 'm c-Q,v m ,D C 0 OOI mcmwr > - >m m 1 1 v �.W0v° • QvR ° Q7.mCZ ��o <Q� a M o (° v 7 a, cn a, F, O ° ° D D ,- ° - °- 10 ° m < o . v (D 0 /XI a CO ° ° Q cQ v cQ .- . w — ° o Co. `< *. c c o v c - 0 CO 3 a r -1 w v o o_ o c ° o , 0- 0- C cn ° Q 'Q o n XI -- - •,( Qr a m * o � Q omcC D � D _ X000 m O m 5 m m �' o D ° g r Z D-° c o < ° ° c - . v - Q m a ((n eD * a O' Q O -0 o - Q v ml Z O O CC N O a CD O aaeaaeaiNa;$ e "� fr '11 6 0 0 0 x ° * o . 3 ° o� - 3 3< Q -1 - o c O ▪ 7- 7 Z = � a) -0 �v,� T= N - . O 7 .+ N 3 C rf O , - (D a - - • ` c o n m Q W o ' v c v N m — ( T � G Q 0 ' * N ' O (D Z - n m m ° Nm5va °o o = o p n � z Q o v_ = .- D -.< R1 .O 13 N Z ED ca o � ° � ° ° O x� c� 73 � - o m * ° o v c° o r m 0 3 O `G O -2 0 v (D W O < 3 5- a 7' o a _ w -, v Q Q • = o - - m c * c o (0 W5-"*— 0- Z \ , -.1 � °m m „ ,_... s�?s4 �� ( i2-5 . oma) — r 14 Z _, S Q O c , < - -. O 3 -, >S:dcea eaascceaceat eeuc�, ° �� (D (p (D ° (p O r O o CO C N w O co c N o O • ( Q (° (D (D 0 3 �� Z co N 0 (D v (D v o o v N "_ ___ -- c C 0 O (D O (° r' C O n Cmv O m •< - w c Q 3 ,< * * ,- m } � - v. m ,__,_a) om v al co -- ‹ m , v ° V Q _ _ 0 W Z TI o o m (° cn m O' y c o O o v D- a 0 m 0-0 cn m 0 o ° co c D ° (� �' c� m - 11 Z y Xi 0 3 3 Q m Ulll T * Z � � _ h 3 x� m m.� N m N .-. O ° v (D (D n ° O =,, §. (D ° O m 7,1 r 1 f, - � * � -hN ° o 5- °�n Q_ � 0 M a (D -, o = - o o (D `< -, W - .:< gv ' m < M z 1111 a m�mn� m c°����� ' < �v 4 `� mc�cnmz�z�DzD v Q0 �3 o -m Q v N RI Cn �p , z _ C OV — o - m o vC O Cn cn v v v�oQ�N' v v�m �s 1 e .. g, s e e aT I �_ ( p �' (D O N c ' c N (D C O e . C C -s " ' m All aeeacx ee a€ a ee l _ O 7 (D O 3 Q CQ � N ° �. r C n ° ( ) w J s -. O N N (D < (p Q G a Q O- m- cn (n v VI . v • Z N O5 7"° O N 7• Q .--• , -� Z v Q o C C .<• o (° = 3 = 0 C cn c,' cn Q O n -, o g (D ° m- (n g m Q T o v° :WE< o ° ' � v ° a_ Q m v � N (D W . v - ° 6 - a- v :0_21 ( D v-0 a O 0 C C-D N (D cn (D Q N m iys _ _ = Z mi 0 Q (n m m o (° �, n ca m cn Z n p � ' O (� O m ( Q (Q (D O A m 7 c o c ° (o - cc! cu (a 3 O D m o v ( D v O v _co. O m o v O cn o ° (/) 3 m° • Z (� c Q ° ° ° 3 Q v v v ° 0- s -1 v •< 0 �' m v m o o v = '- � . v v c n c m 5 ED F c i c c� FD v v o. c -�zN o cn : --Iwo o v n, cn-P Z ZD O D O O (D O 100,15* xi-x,° Q N 0 O O (D Q Q ( (D L O O p (D ° 0 D m p Z o m _o 7 (n - n O - 7 7 a W O C° Z a =a 7 v ° � �v (Q� c - �`` o ° 00 0.5' v 3 y o, O I c ; _ (0 5. °- cD o c m ° o (n 3 m 3 v c- 0 rn Z m m co ` G C (n Q n c c (o O � - Q (D C (D = 0 k< M c....1 r" r " I I 1 J (D O Z 3 v 5-0 C ° - (D (1), ?" O �_ _ z 370 / moo \� A� ? N D Q O R o o C , v v 0 3 o (° o cn ° O <- p 0/ * .9. y i O Q ° o < c 3 0 ' f9a M 04'S a," , . c C oo v °. 11i'- c C Z O m o a Qn(o 2oo nv °c ° �R ; :.i i ts �;�i��`�^� i.> M m v T O-' cQ ° 7 ' 3 ii v c 3 o a o Q N E ‘t `� ' \� 9. k v p� ,° ° , v D- v o w c 3 ° v 3 7 E - n m i l_it Q cn co v (D Q n C ° (D 7 Q (D 3 O s Z� °-�� v ( Q v, ° v m Q m w 0 3 D0 c9 r p 3 C to O a) o �5 0 m C DD O v Q" � a a m 0 mi E U LJ o n 3 o ` O cD C - p v C7 o z rz Z a x�� 0W0 <_ (��(� � � m 70 m . M m - o °m 0 ° 0co 0 0 mM Xi m c Q ,w Q-° o (D v c o m m Do mi r Z Cl/ 3 v -o o Q ° � _ o • p v,c 3 _ „� Q o o m • = c (D CL G o m m N0 CD -1 m m C 3 0 �. 0 0 0 D o u) n- 0 Q 3 m o v o 3 O 3 9. c c m a) � , v D c ») Q o n) ' 3 3 m a m m Q n c Q o ° m C _= v O ' v `D v 3 C Q3Q-m mPvo: - "w ° Q .oD ° 05 m h o 6 v� E,`) m _ � _ v Z C, N n N • N N -0 O N (p a) X N O 3 3 7 - 0 n O O- ' O cn o 2°_ CQ m 3 'n IT1 z o ° n m m m D D o° c ' D v r a r v m `° v v o . co 7 . O m- m Q w c Q o o v O . Q L v o Z y n n c cn n -0 a ° C m m' 0 Q C, (D < (n a, �, Q 3 (p O ff + CD M p c C ?. D 115 Cn CD p (n ( (D Q V p' N 0 7 O N Z q7 Q a n 0 3 /�/ D n 0 cn N li 7 N o m �fl 3 • o Xi ��� O ° �Q °° a ��'� o n D j ij 7 7 ° Q °- Q (D C 0 v< a o Z cm ° cn v (n 3 (- C O(n D (n - (D _ (D (n a _, 0 m o Xi C) c .-. 0 m o . m (n Q o z m m `° o N � Q C c n, v Gs � O i i — �= o m b `.° ‹. C 7< (D - ° 0 Q c 7 Q `< ,- (D - . y r < m S (n c vi -0 m - LI - - � om ° m vmQ c g oa,o �' v • -• a a Cnn � �o co u) i'n C0 � aa -I t7Jm m o m C-) <ovv F (1) m D' v N �oQ ° v n Co • cn m o x (n c c, < Q �_ o Z< Z o° Z Ch c0 wxx� 0 ° , < 7 <m *d O vmm 3°v` <m p ma o= s �� 0„ • C u) 1 (D N° a N C N P ,_ 7 . 0 7 -t, - N 0 v N N TS 0 (D r N ° (Q - O O V, ,-,a) p ( D 7 O O CD (D v C � C a° m Et E m m -..4 1 0 ° co 3 m< v O E v 7. v o ° ° c .< -, 3 0 - © N N N - (D ° (D D cn ° 0 C ( ° C (D Q) 0 < CD 0) co D x ( n < (0 (n - a (o N Q D <. Q O a M T a _ 0 3 D cD 3 -a n � ' -O c o C 7 C 3 N a /� O 0 O � ' ; 0 x N r (D3 - (D v co '- c c° ° O . _ co 3 N )2° r O ( m m 3 m in C) (n O �Q ° vv p = � 0 3 3 0 0 co 0 m c o n Q Z C m o m in Z c a) a n, oc 7 R1 A a 7 v _; O. Q o v v cn Cr) v z v v * o ° 7 u) ° c c �' a �? v v m o .. o - ,� s < o Z °< o f ° Q c° �• v v— O . c m o CD n o c c n o 0 Q D c 3 (0 (0 Q cD . ° � � o 0 Q _ r — . —. 111. r MIN Fangorn Environmental Consultation Frank Powell R.S. Texas Registration # 3115 TNRCC Site Evaluator # OS4762 P.O. Box 272 Copeville Texas, 75121 972 - 843 -0303 Basis for Drip Irrigation Septic Design Uncommon Care N White Chapel Rd Southlake, Texas Presented to Southlake City Council March 23, 1999 On -Site Sewage Facilities Workshops Booklet, OSSF Rules by Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Subchapter D: Planning, Construction and Installation Standards for OSSFS §285.33 Criteria for Sewage Disposal Systems. Section (b) Disposal processes - proprietary Subsection (3) Drip Irrigation. pg. 102 & 103 Drip Irrigation. A drip irrigation system consist of small diameter pressurized lines directly buried in the soil to a nominal depth of 6 inches. The lines contain pressure reducing emitters spaced at 30 inch maximum intervals. The purpose of the pressure reducing emitter is to restrict the flow of effluent from the pipe into the surrounding soil to a very low rate. This distribution method promotes uniform wetting of the soil in the root zone of surface vegetation. Since the near surface root zone of plants will absorb water, even in Class IV soils, this type if system may be used for on -site disposal in these soils. The system must be equipped with a filtering device capable of filtering to 100 microns and meet drip irrigation (pressure emitter) manufacturer requirements. (A) Drainfield layout. The drainfield shall consist of a matrix of lines and emitters arranged in almost any configuration where the layout would ensure equal distribution throughout the drainfield. The system must be equipped with a mechanism to flush from the drainfield back to the treatment unit. (B) Effluent quality. Treatment preceding this disposal process shall treat the wastewater to a degree to preclude plugging of the emitters. This quality shall be determined by the executive director. (C) System maintenance. On -going maintenance contracts in accordance with the maintenance provisions of §285.7 of this title (relating to Additional Application Requirements for Surface Irrigation Systems) shall be required for all emitter systems. Systems must be equipped to flush the system back to the treatment unit. (D) Loading Rates. Pressure emitters can be used in all classes of soils using loading rates as specified in §285.91(1) of this title (relating to Tables). Emitters are assumed to wet four square feet of absorptive area per emitter, however, overlapping areas shall only be' counted once toward absorptive area requirements. (E) There shall be a minimum of 1 foot of soil between the drip emitter and ground water or solid or fractured rock. (F) No device associated with a drip irrigation system shall be installed which has not been labelled by the manufacturer as suitable for use with domestic sewage or is on an approved list of the executive director in accordance with §285.32(b)(5) of this title (relating to Treatment processes - proprietary). f 8El y * m 0 m • II @ r (D C ` 0 04 m m Cr H to F' r K ' p Z m ►-, o r� m w H 'H • 1 ..� H H H H t b Pj a rh 0 Cr fA r ul sii H tr 0 Pi C, H ti H 0 H n O (D ti n N - '1 0 a . F''' H Z > m w D H a n a a m SD n (D -- to n C P 0� r H a m m P a) m 11 �' ' m rx:' Z D H b —J �, �o ()CO -. r• a. 1 1:3 rr CO m , w r a H- o (n rr rr tr (D D �,. (D '4 r m v H 0 rr n W 0 0 0 0 o y h7: • o- N • N • W �: s1 (D 0 0 I- o Ul co t� r: 0 rr Cr rn HI 0 H Z . o (. 0 rr �� _o r n .-• ' la P 0 '' ll (q o o B. ro (n 1--. (f) ( 11 w ti d 'T1 m 0 C7 0 Z 4 TABLE 111 WASTEWATER USAGE RATE This table shall be used for estimating the hydraulic loading rates only ( daily wastewater usage rate (0) for sizing septic tank liquid capacity and drainfield area). Sizing formulas are based on residential strength BOD Commercial /institutional facilities must pretreat their wastewater to 140 BOD or increase disposal area. Actual water usage data or other methods of calculating wastewater usage rates may be used by the system designer if it is accurate and acceptable to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission or its authorized agents. USAGE RATE USAGE RATE GALLONSIDAY GALLONS':IDAY TYPE JP I AGILITY 4Without Water Saving Water Saving Single family dwelling (one or two bedrooms) - less than 1,500 square feet. 225 180 Single family dwelling (three bedrooms) - less than 2,500 square feet. 300 240 Single family dwelling (four bedrooms) - less than 3,500 square feet. 375 300 Single family dwelling (five bedrooms) - less than 4,500 square feet. 450 360 Single family dwelling (six bedrooms) - less than 5,500 square feet. Greater than 5,500 square feet, each additional 1,500 square feet 525 420 or increment thereof. 75 60 Condominium or Townhouse (one or two bedrooms) 225 180 Condominium or Townhouse (each additional bedroom) 75 60 Mobile home (one or two bedrooms) 225 180 Mobile home (each additional bedroom) 75 60 Country Clubs (per member) 25 20 Apartment houses (per bedroom) 125 100 Boarding schools (per room capacity) 50 40 Day care centers (per child with kitchen) 25 20 Day care centers (per child without kitchen) 15 12 Factories (per person per shift) 15 12 Hospitals (per bed) 200 160 Hotels and motels (per bed) 75 60 Nursing homes (per bed) 100 80 Laundries (self service per machine) 250 200 Lounges (bar and tables per person) 10 8 Movie Theaters (per seat) 5 4 Office buildings (no food or showers per occupant) 5 4 Office buildings (with food service per occupant) 10 Parks (with bathhouse per person) 15 12 Parks (without bathhouse per person) 10 Restaurants (per seat) 35 28 Restaurants (fast food per seat) 15 Schools (with food service & gym per student) 25 20 Schools (without food service) 15 Service stations (per vehicle) 10 8 Stores (per washroom) 200 160 Swimming pool bathhouses (per person) 10 8 Travel trailer /RV parks (per space) 50 40 Vet clinics per animal) 10 8 Construction sites (per worker) 50 40 Youth camps (per camper) 30 24 140