The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7ACITY 01 SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT November 28, 2012 CASE NO: ZAl2 -087 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Development Plan for Williamsburg Estates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: G &A Consultants, LLC on behalf of Maguire Partners- Solana Land, L.P. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from "NR -PUD" Non Residential Planned Unit Development to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District for Williamsburg Estates on property described as Tracts 1 C1 A, 1 C1 B, 1 C2 and 1 F, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2600 Kirkwood Blvd., Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #1 REQUEST DETAILS: The proposed zoning change and development plan allows for the development of a residential subdivision consisting of thirty three (33) residential lots and two (2) open space /common area lots on approximately 25.12 acres giving the development a density of 1.31 units /acre. The proposed development will be consistent with the following Site Data Summary Chart and the exhibits attached in section "C" of this report. SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART EXISTING /PROPOSED ZONING LAND USE DESIGNATION GROSS /NET ACREAGE RESIDENTIAL LOT COVERAGE OPEN SPACE AREA OPEN SPACE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS PROPOSED X LOTS NRPUD /RPUD MIXED USE 25.12 AC/25.12 AC 50% MAXIMUM 7.969 AC/347,130 SF 31.7096 2,500 SF MINIMUM 33 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 33 UNITS /25.12 AC = 1.31 DU /AC The proposed "R -PUD" regulations for the development of the request are outlined below in attachment "C" of this report. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider 1 St Reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan Case No. ZAl2 -087 ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (1) STAFF CONTACT: Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information (Link to PowerPoint) SPIN Meeting Report Site Plan Revised Review Summary No. 2, dated November 28, 2012 Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owner Responses Ordinance No. 480 -629 Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Dennis Killough (817)748 -8072 Matt Jones (817)748 -8269 Case No. ZAl2 -087 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: G &A Consultants, LLC OWNER: Maguire Partners- Solana Land, L.P. PROPERTY LOCATION: 2600 Kirkwood Blvd PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1 C1 A, 1 C1 B, 1 C2 and 1 F, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: "NR -PUD" Non Residential Planned Unit Development REQUESTED ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: The property was annexed into the City of Southlake in 1964. The property was zoned "NR -PUD" with the adoption of Ordinances 334, 480, and 480 -180. SOUTH LAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan/ S.H. 114 Corridor Plan The property has an underlying land use designation of "Mixed Use" Residential development is permitted within the "Mixed Use" designation. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows an 8' Multi -Use Trail along S 114 and the north side of the development and an On- Street Bikeway along Kirkwood Blvd. The applicant is providing an 8' trail along the north side of the development and the west side of the development. Staff is recommending that the 8' trail along the west side of the development provide stubbs to the properties to the north and south of the development. WATER & SEWER: There is currently a 12" water line along Kirkwood Blvd., as well as a 10" sewer line along Kirkwood Blvd. TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant has provided a Tree Conservation Plan as part of the "R -PUD" included in Attachment "C" of this report and is subject to the approval of City Council. The proposed tree coverage is consistent with the following chart: Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -087 Page 1 Williamsburg Tree Coverage Percentages Total Site Land Area (77.048 acres) Total Tree Coverage Tree Coverage Percent of Total Area Required minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved Total Tree Coverage Total tree coverage to be removed Tree coverage percent to be removed 1,092,227 SF 701.763 SF 64.3% 40% 701.763 SF 318,093 SF 45.3% Total Tree Coverage 701.763 SF Tree coverage to be preserved 191.940 SF (27.4 %) Marginal tree coverage attempted to be preserved 138,426 SF (19.7 %) Total attempted tree cave rage to be preserved 330,366 SF Tree Coverage attempted to be preserved 47.1% CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on October 22, 2012. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report. P &Z COMMISSION: November 8, 2012; Approved (6 -1), subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated November 2, 2012 and Staff Report dated, November 2, 2012. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Revised Review Summary No. 2, dated November 2, 2012. Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -087 Page 2 Case No. Attachment B ZAl2 -087 Page 1 Vicinity Map Williamsburg Estates of Westlake °., i ■u ■u ■u ■u■R SH 114 ° o G ZAl2 -087 r..,, Zoning Development Plan Between SH 114 and Kirkwood Blvd. north of 500 W. Dove Rd. R' _ E 0 362.5 725 1,450 S Feet Case No. Attachment B ZAl2 -087 Page 1 Proposed R -PUD Regulations Development Standards Residential Planned Unit Development District Williamsburg Estates + / - 25.12 Acres PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose and intent of the Residential Planned Unit Development District (RPUD) is to provide for medium density single family uses and open space uses by incorporating specific development standards. II. PERMITTED USES The following uses shall be permitted uses in the RPUD District for Williamsburg Estates: a. All uses permitted under Section 14.2 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance, "SF -20A Single Family Residential District" III. ACCESSORY USES All accessory uses listed under Section 34 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance for the SF -20A Zoning District shall be authorized as accessory uses in RPUD District IV. SPECIFIC USE PERMITS Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any conditions the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance. In this RPUD District , the following development regulations shall be applicable: a. Height: No building or structure shall exceed two and one -half stories, nor shall it exceed thirty -five (35) feet. b. Front Yard: There shall be a minimum front yard setback of twenty (25) feet. c. Side Yard: There shall be a minimum side yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. Corner lots shall also have a minimum side yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. Key lots, or lots that have aside yard along those streets which other lots front onto and are not separated by a block break or street intersection, shall have a minimum side yard setback of twenty five (25) feet. d. Rear Yard: There shall be a minimum rear yard setback of thirty (30) feet. For lots fronting onto a cul -de -sac, there shall be a minimum rear yard setback of twenty five (25) feet. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -087 Page 1 e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not to exceed fifty percent (50 %) of the lot area. f. Lot Area: The minimum area of a residential lot shall be twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. g. Lot Dimensions: Each residential lot shall have a minimum width of eighty (80) feet to be measured at the front yard setback line. The minimum depth of a residential lot shall be one hundred (100) feet. h. Floor Area: The main residence shall contain a minimum of two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of floor area. i. Maximum Residential Density: The maximum number of dwelling units per acre shall not exceed 1.4. j. Lots on which a possible ephemeral stream is located, shall be permitted to reduce the dimensional and area regulations listed above in the event the actual extents of the stream, upon determination of a field survey, encroach the buildable areas. These lots shall not be permitted to have buildable areas within the ephemeral stream. VI. OPEN SPACE, TRAIL, AND BUFFERYARD REQUIREMENTS a. Common Open Space Areas: 1. The minimum amount of common open space area within the development shall not be less than fifteen percent (15 %) of the gross site area. 2. Common open space areas shall consist of those areas used as landscape buffers, open space lots, amenity lots, pedestrian access, greenbelts, FEMA floodplain, and /or drainage areas. 3. Common open space areas shall be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. b. Public Trails: 1. An eight -foot (8') public multi -use trail shall be provided along SH 114 within the open space lot. C. Bufferyards: 1. The bufferyard along SH 114 shall be a variable width. Proposed street and sidewalk pavement and associated improvements shall be permitted within the bufferyard as shown on the approved Development Plan. 2. The bufferyard along SH 114 shall be permitted a masonry wall on the highway ROW line to serve as a visual and noise barrier to the proposed residents. 3. The bufferyard along Kirkwood Blvd shall be variable width. The existing trees and native plants and grasses shall be left in their natural state and the City required plantings for a Type B buffer shall not be required with this RPUD. VII. TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS The following tree preservation requirements shall be applicable to the Williamsburg Estates RPUD District: Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -087 Page 2 a. Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Tree Preservation Requirements: A Tree Conservation Analysis with an Alternative to a Tree Survey shall be required for all Development Plan and Preliminary Plat applications for Williamsburg Estates. b. Final Plat Tree Preservation Requirements: A Tree Conservation Plan shall be required for all Final Plat application for Williamsburg Estates and shall exclude the following areas from the Tree Survey and Tree Replacement requirements: 1. All residential lot building pads plus 15 feet on all sides. 2. All vehicular rights -of -ways. 3. All utility and drainage easements. 4. All floodplain areas. 5. All areas identified on the Tree Conservation Management as areas to be "preserved ". 6. All areas identified on the Tree Conservation Management Plan as areas to be "altered ". All areas identified on the Tree Conservation Management Plan as "marginal" shall have all protected trees surveyed and identified and shall require tree replacements when required bytheTree Preservation Ordinance. The marginal tree coverage category shall be counted towards the minimum tree coverage to be preserved. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -087 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ueld_uaudolanad sy��nsuo�� m , Z 0 m � o � w ' < - c wu u. a __ ki i K s CI I �P o — , Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -087 Page 4 < u < o $ a m ki i K s CI I �P o — , Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -087 Page 4 SPIN MEETING REPORT S0UTHLA1<, SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. PROJECT NAME: SPIN DISTRICT: MEETING DATE: MEETING LOCATION ZA 12 -087 Williamsburg Estates SPIN # 1 October 22, 2012: 6:00 PM 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3C — 3D TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirteen (13) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Ron Evans# 10, RayTremain #9 • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Randi Rivera, G &A Consultants, LLC, et al (5) • STAFF PRESENT: Caroline Eckel, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Matt Jones, Planner I: (817)748 -8269 or miones(@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located between Kirkwood Blvd. and State Highway 114, north of the Verizon Campus: and is approximately 25 acres. Development Details • Zoning Change and Development Plan proposed for approximately 33 single family residential lots. • Current zoning district is NRPUD — Non - Residential Planned Unit Development. • Proposed zoning district is RPUD — Residential Planned Unit Development with regulations that are consistent with a SF -20A — Single Family Residential District. The plan presented at SPIN: Wd * a V` Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -087 Page 1 QUESTIONS 1 CONCERNS • Will the development only have one access point along Kirkwood? o Yes, the development will have one entry at a median cut along Kirkwood Blvd. Kirkwood Blvd. will be constructed as outlined in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. No service road exists and no access will be provided toward S.H. 114. All homes will be sprinkled. • What kind of fence will you have along the perimeter? o An 8' masonry wall is planned along the side facing S.H. 114, along with landscaping and open space buffer. We would like to construct a taller wall, if allowable, to help buffer any noise from S.H. 114. • The average lot area is 18,000 SF, but the minimum lot required is 15,000 SF, will you ever have 15,000 SF lots? o We will have some lots smaller than 18,000 SF and many larger lots. Our smallest lot is 15,200 SF. • We've seen some homes in certain price points trend toward becoming rentals. What are your anticipated starting prices? o $250,000 per lot and $750,000 - 1,000,000 homes. • Who will build? o Ashton Woods. • Are you selling to more than one builder? o Since we only have 33 lots, no. • The proximity to S.H. 114 will be a selling challenge for these homes. o We are designing the homes and development to maximize the buffer. Only 4 homes will have sides facing toward S.H.114. Garages will be oriented on the western sides of these properties. It is also possible that these homes will be sold for less. • Do you have a plan if the homes do not sell at $750,000 - 1,000,000? o If they do not readily bring the price we want, we will amenitize, adding pools and improving finishes to keep prices up. We have built homes for 27 years, including a large number of homes in Trophy Club and Colleyville. We will sell homes. • Will the designs for these properties be consistent architecturally? o We can have deed restrictions to include stipulations for roof types, pitches, % of masonry, etc., as we are able to do so. But ultimately these will be custom built homes tailored to the clients' desires. • Are there typical plans that we could see? o These are custom built homes. But you could look at Hogan's Glen in Trophy Club similarly built homes, one step down in price point. • Will residents have to make a u -turn to enter the property? o No, a median cut would exist at the main entrance, and we would pour the other half of Kirkwood in front of the property. • Will you be able to provide landscaping on the public property along Kirkwood? Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -087 Page 2 o We will be landscaping, and may consider options for doing so as part of our tree conservation plan. We will be able to landscape along the front of our property, but not on someone else's property along Kirkwood. • Will the proposed addition on the north side of Verizon create undesirable views for these new homes? o We will look at sightlines for the homes and add landscaping to buffer. • A large number of wild hogs are currently living on the property. As this is constructed, I do not want them ending up in my front yard. o We have dealt with hogs on other recent developments, and would take care of any potential issues here. • 1 notice there are no towers with turrets, as I had seen previously. o Yes, we are listening to your feedback and would like to design something more timeless, and desirable by neighbors. • Will this have a "Mid- Atlantic" feel as previously described? o Ultimately we will be accommodating clients and constructing custom built homes according to their desires. • Will you include any spec homes? o Yes, typically 3 -4 spec homes. • The noise from S.H. 114 will be a challenge. o We intend to preserve trees, design the roof pitches, and take additional measures to buffer the noise, and buffer along Verizon's Campus as well. • It would be important to keep a natural look, landscaping, buffering noise. Doing so would help these homes, and help keep property values up for everyone. • 1 am glad to hear the lots are larger than I originally thought. Could you send a list of all lot sizes? o Yes, we can send you a site plan with lot sizes. • If this site is developed, we prefer to see houses here, we just want to ensure they are developed in a way that protects our neighboring home values. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes, rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -087 Page 3 Case No.: ZAl2 -087 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Revised Review No.: Two Date of Review: 11/28/12 Project Name: ZDP — Williamsburg Estates APPLICANT: G &A Consultants, LLC 611 Dallas Dr. Ste. 114 Roanoke, TX 76262 Phone: (682) 831 -9712 Fax: (817) 890 -4043 OWNER: Maguire Partners- Solana Land L.P. 1221 N- 1 -35E, Ste. 200 Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone: (469) 892 -7200 Fax: (469) 892 -7202 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/22/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT MATT JONES AT (817) 748 -8072. The 8' path on the west side of the development along SH 114 will need to provide direct connectivity to the north and south of the property by extending to the north and south boundaries of the property. 2. According to the Subdivision Ordinance, a minimum of two planned points of ingress and egress should be provided. The R -PUD proposes only one point of ingress and egress. Per the Fire Department, subdivisions having 30 lots or more shall fire sprinkle all residences. (See Fire Department Comments for details) Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 1 Tree Conservation /Landscape Review Case No. ZAl2 -087 Review No. One Dated: September 19, 2012 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Williamsburg Estates (Zoning Change - Development Plan) Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713 The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on September 10, 2012 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: Provide a Tree Conservation Plan clearly identifying areas to be preserved, areas to be removed, and areas of marginal removal. The plan should also include estimated percent of existing tree coverage, percentage of tree coverage to be conserved, percentage to be removed, and percentage that is marginal. 2. When applicant is seeking a R -PUD zoned development they may seek approval of a Tree Preservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan alternate from the minimum required Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements but it looks like the proposed subdivision design may not comply with the existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements as it applies across the development if a Single Family Zoning was requested. 3. Staff recommends basing the proposed Tree Cove Conservation Plan on the following requirements: Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Case No. ZAl2 -087 Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be reserved* 0%-20% 70% 20.1-40% 60% 40.1%-60% 50% 60.1%-80% 40% 80.1%-100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights -of -way as approved by City Council. b. For property sought to be zoned for Planned Unit Development, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: Attachment E Page 2 placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. BUFFERYARDS: With an R -PUD zoning the applicant may propose alternative bufferyards as part of the developmental regulations. For a Single Family Zoning the minimum of a 25' -G type bufferyard and associated plant material are required to be provided adjacent to the right -of -way of Highway 114. 2. With an R -PUD zoning the applicant may propose alternative bufferyards as part of the developmental regulations. For a Single Family Zoning the minim of a 10' -B type bufferyard and associated plant material are required to be provided adjacent to the right -of -way of West Kirkwood Blvd. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 3 Public Works /Engineering Review Case No. ZAl2 -087 Review No. 1 Date: 9/20/12 Number of Pages: 3 Project Name: Williamsburg Estates Development Plan Contact: Alex Ayala — Civil Engineer Email: aayalaCa_ci. south lake.tx.us Phone: (817) 748 -8274 Fax: (817)748 -8077 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on: 9/10/2012 It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. Cr7 Ell h1 Ell VIA WaT197JiIJiI Ell h111 &'1 This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. Comments with * are informational and /or will be required to be addressed in the Civil Construction Plans. A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department for connections with the City's sewer, water or storm drain inlets. Contact Public Works Operations at (817) 748 -8082. 3. The Public Works Department is currently researching any agreements pertaining to the construction of Kirkwood Blvd. The proposed construction of Kirkwood needs to be identified on the plans. 4. Label the proposed right -of -way for the proposed streets. 5. The driveway shown does not clearly depict the connection to Kirkwood Blvd. 6. Show the curb return radii for all proposed drives, 30' minimum if in the fire lane. 7. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in either direction from the proposed drive on Kirkwood Blvd. Street intersections must comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. EASEMENTS: 1. Show all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage on plat and utility plans. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. A drainage easement will be required for the amenity ponds of this development. The drainage easement must contain access points for maintenance. The plat must have language included that the amenity ponds will be maintained by the Home Owner's Association. 3. The ephemeral stream will need to be in a drainage easement. The width of the easement needs to be determined based on the 100 -year water surface elevation plus 1 -foot freeboard for the stream plus 5 -feet on each side for access and maintenance. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 4 4. Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW. All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Fire hydrants and water meters must be located in an easement or right -of -way. 2. Fire lines will need to be separate from irrigation and service lines. 3. All water and sewer line need to be in easements or right -of -way and must be constructed to City standards. IQZUIill File] ad•]JiIJil21 ill 1116'31 The difference between pre and post development runoff shall be captured in the detention ponds. The proposed detention ponds shall control the discharges of the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events. 2. Verify that the size, shape, and /or location of the detention ponds as depicted on the development plan. Any changes to the size, shape, and /or location of the proposed ponds may require a revision to the development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 3. Base flood elevations (BFE) need to be shown on drainage plans. Finish floor elevations of dwellings along a flood plain will need to be set 2 -feet above the BFE and accurate floodplain limits shown on the plat. 4. Submit a preliminary drainage plan with preliminary calculations for amenity ponds showing the 2, 10 and 100 year runoff calculations. 5. The ephemeral stream along Lots 31, 32 and 33 will need to be in a drainage easement. The easement shall be wide enough to convey the 100 -year storm event with a 1 -foot freeboard plus 5 -feet on each side for maintenance access. Provide channel calculations showing the water surface elevation for a 100 -year storm event. 6. Submit a preliminary grading plan which includes drainage arrows and 2' contours. Contours may be obtained from the City of Southlake. Hydraulic calculations will be required for all proposed storm drain systems. Lot -to -lot drainage will not be allowed and grading plan should clearly depict how runoff will discharge onto street. This property drains into Critical Drainage Structure #3 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($186.15/Acre). All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be RCP. The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" x 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. http:// www. citvofsouthlake. com/ Pub ]icWorks /engineeringdesign.asp Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 5 A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated, Ordinance No. 836. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 6 Fire Department Review Case No. ZAl2 -087 Review No. 1 Dated: 09 -19 -2012 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Williamsburg Estates Contact: Kelly Clements, Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: 817- 748 -8233 Fax: 817- 748 -8181 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 09 -10 -2012. Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and alternate names as soon as possible. Automatic fire sprinkler systems will be required for all residences in the subdivision if a secondary ingress /egress fire access (Fire lane) is not provided. The separation distance between the two ingress /egress areas must be at least half of the greatest linear dimension of the entire subdivision. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus ( minim um of 80,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) Fire lanes require minim 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. Cul -de -Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 100 ft. total diameter for approved turnaround. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants to have Hydra -Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper outlet for five inch diameter hose. Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R -3 and U Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un- sprinkled homes and 600 feet for subdivisions that are completely sprinkled. Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. Add hydrant at main entrance if one if not currently present at this location. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 7 All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the International Fire Code currently amended and adopted. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 8 Informational Comments: Staff recommends providing more information in regards to the type and what the features look like to be provided as part of the amenities. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 or 75 LDN D /FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -087 Page 9 I X11N: T• 111ki 1•]Iki Mill:Z•] »:4WMITY1kiIA *9 - • 1. Owner Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd Zoning AG Land Use Mixed Use, Low Density Residential Acreage 10.07 Response NR 2. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 5.85 NR 3. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 3.08 NR 4. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 2.52 NR 5. Mesenbrink, Daniel S Etux M L RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.67 NR 6. Favero, James R Etux Taryn D RPUD Medium Density Residential, 0.58 NR 7. Ott, Timothy Etux Deborah D RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.56 NR 8. Cary, Carmen 5 & Kenneth C RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.69 F 9. McElroy, Kathleen Brewer RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.57 NR 10. Rayner, Fred RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.54 NR 11. Excel Management Corporation RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.60 NR 12. Burtnett, Michael & 5 Rogers RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.66 O 13. Parker, Thane D Etux Vera E RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.65 NR 14. Fischer, DirkT Etux Elaine RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.68 NR 15. Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn RPUD Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use 1.17 NR 16. Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.10 NR 17. Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.70 NR 18. Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn RPUD Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use 0.09 NR 19. Litwin, Mark S RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.51 NR 20. Arison, loan C Etvir Alan 5 RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.44 O 21. Green, Kayle C Etux Tina A RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 O 22. Agualimpia, Juan & M Issacs RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.38 NR 23. Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential, 0.74 NR Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -087 Page 1 Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Fifty one (56) Responses Received: Six (6) responses have been received, three (3) in favor and three (3) in opposition. Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -087 Page 2 Mixed Use 24. Zhou, Jun Etux Na Li RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.38 NR 25. Bollini, Sashidhar Etux Sesha RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.37 NR 26. Mansoor, Shadan RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 NR 27. Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use 0.32 NR 28. Southlake, City Of RPUD Public /Semi - Public, Medium Density Residential 0.44 NR 29. Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Public /Semi - Public, Medium Density Residential 0.46 NR 30. Kirkwood Hollow Home Own Ass RPUD Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use 0.14 NR 31. Neill, Rosemma & Kay V Gunn SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.50 NR 32. Wise Asset No 9 Ltd SF1 -A Low Density Residential 2.11 NR 33. Wayland, Cheryl Renee SF1 -A Low Density Residential 3.05 NR 34. Redus Texas Land Llc NRPUD Mixed Use 84.04 NR 35. Redus Texas Land Llc NRPUD Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use 11.25 NR 36. Southlake City NRPUD Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential, 4.39 NR 37. Verizon Wireless Texas Llc NRPUD Mixed Use 24.86 NR 38. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 5.25 NR 39. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 12.57 NR 40. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 4.19 NR 41. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.91 NR 42. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.90 NR 43. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 3.65 NR 44. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.26 NR 45. Maguire Ptnrs - Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 1.14 NR 46. Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use 19.99 NR 47. Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use, 0.24 NR 48. Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use, 4.38 NR 49. Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD 100 -Year Flood Plain 0.08 NR 50. Dove 114 Infinity Llc SP2 Mixed Use, 54.44 F 51. T Zero Partners Lp AG Office Commercial 5.64 F Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Fifty one (56) Responses Received: Six (6) responses have been received, three (3) in favor and three (3) in opposition. Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -087 Page 2 PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES Oct 2712 08:3 7a Alan Arson. 662S319715 Notification Response Folf FAl2.087 Nlaedn9 Dads: November 8, 2012 at 6.30 PM Aeison, Joan C Etvir Alan S 422 CoppeTfeld S South T x, 76092 276SE f 8 P, l PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUSUC HEARING. Being the oWner(s) of the property so noted 8b*v0, Ove herebY sed�f��. undedded about in favor of oiapc . �dreie or undehine one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan refemoed above, Space for commetft regarding your posifion: t> ; 'rV vcal+ — < �I Signature: L Ad dibona1 Pfin Merle(. s)= t} 1r : C- C' . Mud be p WMV r(5) whow -W 0 pane POVOd uttW, OtherWMa wnlad the Date: ' :: � a' E t . 'o AWY2 — tw pw Phone Number (opt onal ); ;o - - '? 33 - 0 i Case No. ZAl2 -087 Attachment G Page 1 Notification R esponse Form ZAl2 -087 Meeting Date: November 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM Burtnett, Michael & S Bagel 2811 Tyler St Southlake Tic. 76092 227680: 1 6 '(0 PLEASE PROVIDE C OMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED 'PUBLIC HEARING. . Being the owner(s) of the pro erty so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about irela or un edine one the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. gnnr -o fr%r o- evrFlFnanta npna rdinn vni nosifinn +ir_,ln l Signature: Additional mature'. Printed Name(s):, W4AIWI M1 u" ba pruperty - awner(s) %where names] are pr nted at Phone Number (optional): Date: Date: - -° e go ��s top Iherw" owtact th NolInIng DoWment One form per pros -Pfly Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -087 Page 2 Notfirication Response fang es to: ZA ? - 087 :tt�r cif 5oUthlak Meeting Date: November 8, 2012at+6:30 PM P� Wring A".D.ev lnprr�er�t:5e:VjCes. r+1ti.atr+n .ts prs Cary, {Carmen S & Kenneth C 508 Rourd Hollow Ln 4 2 Southlake Tx, 76092 `A . � � 21 , 227680 1 2 71 r ax �°Zj748077 - PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA IYIAIL� FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being this o ) of the property so noted above, are hereby i favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underfine ore) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for ccrnments regarding your position: Signature: d i l N i l f Date: A dditional Signature: Date- Or4 Printed Marne : ' d , , Most be property ownef(6) whose mame(s) are printed at WP. Otherwise amts a Plarrv" D Ww , Gne foam Fwpropa Phone Number (option Case No. ZAl2 -087 Attachment G Page 3 Notification Response Form ZAl2 -D87 Meeting Date. November 8. 2012 at 6:30 PIN Dove 114 Infinity Llc -1121 S Carroll Ave Soukhlake Tx, 76092 A1620 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL,. FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. . Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby =vo oppose d to undecided about (circle or underline ore) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position. Signature Add itic] Printed Narne(s): rulwsi be priDWLy owier(s) wh Phone Number (optional): r Date; Date: per propeo. Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -087 Page 4 Notification. Response Formal ZA 12 -087 Meeting Date: November 8, 2012 at 6 :30 PM Green, Kayle C Etax Tina A 421 Capper St outhlake Tx, 75002 22766F 1 9 " o- �i #sr� �IC�`FT�� reS�1111$:tD, Y s R t x - N.: PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE E THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLiD HEARING. . Being the o ner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one). the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: a 7S 4 Ae - R r l )qo T d r , ill tl. is ' MA aTrWr2"` Signature: Date: / o Additional Signature: � Date: Printed Narne(s): I -K4E &eb T , r ZJ Must be property,oLwo-c-t(s) wtiosenatne(sy pnirt atiop. Other cmTEEb `tl7e Planning Dcpart,•nerit. Cr)efban tierprcputy. Phone Number (optional): 2N 1 9V 'r 1 Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -087 Page 5 Notification Response Farm ZAl2 UBI Meating Date: November 8, 20112 at 6:311 Pill T Zero Partners Lp 136631 Ashridge Dallas Tx, 75240 }1620 18 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the properly so noted above, are hereby in favor of _ opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Charge and Development Plan referenced above- Space for comments regarding your position Signature- Additional Sign ii Printed Name(s): Must be property owmer(s) wlh Phone lumber (optional): One form per property- Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -087 Page 6 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -629 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 1 C1A, 1 C1 B, 1C2 AND 1 F, T. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 25.12 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "NR -PUD" NON RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "R -PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "NR -PUD" Non Residential Planned Unit Development District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 1 and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 2 those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tracts 1 C1 A, 1C113, 1 C2 and 1F, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately 25.12 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "NR -PUD" Non Residential Planned Unit Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 3 Development District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following conditions: Reserve for conditions of approval. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 4 appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 4 th day of December, 2012. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 15 day of January, 2013. MAYOR Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 6 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: EXHIBIT "A" Being on property described as: Tracts 1 C1 A, 1 C1 B, 1 C2 and 1F, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134 Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 7 x:1:11:311MAi RESERVED FOR APPROVED SITE PLAN AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -087 Page 8