Loading...
Item 6C13 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF Department of Planning & Development Services �'M drill 0 =: »1911 :aI November 28, 2012 CASE NO: ZAl2 -085 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Ridgeview at Southlake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Mary & Mike Cosgrove and Pat Sheehey, Four Peaks — RM, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Ridgeview at Southlake from "TZD" Transition Zoning District to "TZD" Transition Zoning District on approximately 13.22 acres located at 505 to 519 Davis Boulevard. SPIN Neighborhood #10 DETAILS: Four Peaks — RM, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Ridgeview at Southlake from the current "TZD" Transition Zoning District and approved development plan, consisting of twenty -four (24) residential lots and 3 general office buildings approved by City Council on February 17, 2009 (Planning Case ZA08 -075), to "TZD" Transition Zoning District in order to modify the development plan. The request primarily involves the removal of the three (3) office buildings totaling approximately 25,807 square feet in size from the development plan and proposing to include seven (7) single - family residential lots in its place to make a total of thirty -one (31) single - family residential lots. All other zoning requirements are to remain in place as was previously approved by the City Council. At City Council's 1 Reading on this item, the applicant was asked to provide more information on the following items: • Have a restriction limiting front facing garage doors to five homes with a separating column with no two side by side doors and the garage doors will be made of cedar material; Have a plan for streetscape, signage and mailboxes; Investigate the removal of the northern retention pond; Add entrance and amenity features to the southern entrance of the subdivision. The applicant has provided these items and exhibits to City Council and can also be found under Attachment `C' of this staff report. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider 2 nd Reading Zoning Change and Development Plan Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012 Case No. ZAl2 -085 (E) SPIN Report — Held on October 8, 2012 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (H) Ordinance No. 480 -578a (1) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748 -8067 Daniel Cortez (817) 748 -8070 Case No. ZAl2 -085 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Mary S. Cosgrove, Michael P. Cosgrove, and Pat Sheehey APPLICANT: Four Peaks — RM, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 505, 507, 511, 515 and 519 Davis Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 2A, 2A1, 2A5C, and 2A6 in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 and Tracts 1 and 1C, Thomas J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: TZD — Transition Zoning District REQUESTED ZONING: TZD — Transition Zoning District HISTORY: - The approximately 1,284 square -foot structure at 511 Davis Blvd is identified in several historical publications as the Wilson -Brown House. Tarrant Appraisal District lists the structure as having been built in 1900, but other sources indicate that the main portion of the house may have been built in the early 1880's. It was originally a log structure, but later additions and modifications such as wood or vinyl siding have changed its appearance over the years. The house originally belonged to Robert E. Wilson (1845- 1923), credited as the founder of the Jellico settlement that once existed near the intersection of Southlake and Davis Boulevards, and is shown on an 1895 map of Tarrant County in the same approximate location as can be seen using aerial photography today. Using the TAD data, it is probable that the house is the oldest remaining dwelling in Southlake, and it is almost certain that it is the last remaining structure from the Jellico community, which had all but disappeared by 1920. - Tarrant Appraisal District shows the homes at 515 and 519 Davis Blvd. were built in 1960 and 1972 respectively. - On October 1, 1996 the City Council approved "SF -20A" zoning (Ord. 480- 207) for the Southlake Woods residential subdivision, including a 0.4 -acre access strip to Davis Blvd which was never officially platted as part of Southlake Woods - On April 7, 1998 the City Council approved "S -P -1" zoning (Ord. 480 -272) on the northernmost 3.7 acres of this request for an urgent care medical facility. - On February 17, 2009 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Ridgeview at Southlake under Planning Case ZA08- 075. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on October 8, 2012 at Southlake Town Hall for the proposed development. A copy of the SPIN report can be found under Attachment `E' of this staff report. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development has approximately 1375 -feet of frontage along Davis Boulevard (FM 1938), a five -lane TXDOT roadway with paved shoulders. The development is proposing two new streets that will intersect with Davis Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -085 Pagel Traffic Impact The developer's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), conducted by C &P Engineering, was reviewed by Lee Engineering at the request of City staff in 2008 when this development was initially reviewed. That review is included in Attachment `C' of the report under Planning Case ZA08 -075. An update to traffic study was provided by the applicant and it is noted that the modified development plan being proposed has a reduced impact than the previous proposal. Information from this updated report can be found under Attachment `C' of this staff report. Any potential deceleration lanes as a result of this development would need to be evaluated by the Texas Department of Transportation ( TxDOT). TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant is proposing to preserve a majority of the existing trees along the western boundary with Davis Boulevard. There is approximately 28.9% existing tree cover and the applicant is proposing to preserve 51.5% tree cover. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use The Southlake 2030 Consolidate Future Land Use Plan designates this area as Mixed Use. As proposed, the development being proposed is consistent with the future land use in place. Master Thoroughfare Plan & Median Plan Southlake's Master Thoroughfare Plan calls for Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) to be a multi -lane TXDOT roadway requiring 130 feet of right -of- way. No additional right -of -way is required to be dedicated by these properties at this time. The Median Plan component of Southlake's Urban Design Plan recommends a landscaped median in Davis Blvd with a full median break /opening at this development's northernmost entry. However, it is not anticipated that medians will be constructed on Davis Blvd. in the near future. Pathways / Sidewalk Plan Neither the Pathways Master Plan nor the Sidewalk Plan make any Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -085 Page 2 Blvd and serve the development. A street stub is also proposed to allow for a future connection to undeveloped properties to the south. * Vehicle Trips Per Day (Vtpd) * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Quantities based on Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition recommendations for sidewalks or trails along the east side of Davis Blvd in this location. A 6 -foot sidewalk is proposed along Davis Blvd and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides of internal streets. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: October 18, 2012; Approved (6 -0) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated October 12, 2012 and Staff Report dated October 18, 2012. This motion also includes the applicant's willingness to include in the CC &R's and making deed restrictions that trees along the east boundary will be maintained in perpetuity at a minimum of 4" caliper with an appropriate enforcement by the HOA if they are not maintained and noting the applicant's willingness to abide by the previously approved CC &R's by City Council on February 17, 2009. CITY COUNCIL: 1 St Reading November 6, 2012; Approved (6 -1) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012 and the staff report dated October 31, 2012 and noting that the applicant will provide at the 2nd Reading a restriction limiting front facing garage doors to five homes and that they will have a column spacing in between them and there will be no two side by side and the doors will be made of cedar material to include the motion by Planning & Zoning Commission and will bring back a plan for streetscape, signage, mailbox plan and investigate in removing the northern retention pond and adding entrance and amenity features to the southern entrance of the subdivision. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012. WCommunity DevelopmenhMEMO12012 Cases1085 - ZDP - Ridgeview at SouthlakelStaff Report Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -085 Page 3 Vicinity Map Ridgeview at Southlake ZAl2 -085 Zoning Change & Development Plan 505, 507, 511, 515 and 519 Davis Boulevard N N t 0 550 1,100 2,200 IP S Feet Case No. Attachment B ZAl2 -085 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Currently aaaroved Ridaeview at Southlake Develoament Plan (ZA08 - 075 d�d� a j Case No. ZAl2 -085 I = m f 8 e Ln ru X v ru ru zi 0 ul o > © �- Attachment C Page 1 Proposed Development Plan if ! FS9di� �i� 9jj1 • �F ee �p F Al 7 A pii a F 3 @ 0 � 2 e € " 3 E d b #,�� t Rp� AlZ a ;! H -1 1 1 ! " � tj � � � 8. �.E `tE3j Sqe all ' Al �Ecll a ffA eFb3pp S 6 � {$ e I! i. eta e§ eY t aq a_•I S 8° ! .p ! 8' Si $� § F1j�3 l�6�55� €FBI t� f °a tp �a3 $eF �� Ea�E a3uF I 9 H . Es H1 Eei Hi Ead ES E�6 !1 �F �3� a All w a �= 222 i f $ i C ink It Rya n €j ti t� ��' = •acme � �� - � s ^§ Is S -A gdn 0 1 0 Q r'4 N y 4 a3 In -� U � C N 4� I, • ^I f0 d a� a. _O ' W Q) M V) ru x C U ru ai Y ro i 0 V) o� IM r Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 2 mo g �3� a All w a �= 222 i f $ i C ink It Rya n €j ti t� ��' = •acme � �� - � s ^§ Is S -A gdn 0 1 0 Q r'4 N y 4 a3 In -� U � C N 4� I, • ^I f0 d a� a. _O ' W Q) M V) ru x C U ru ai Y ro i 0 V) o� IM r Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 2 C, CO - - C Qj I T AI&� it _.� 2•. L 7� � u L , Ak Z fn A0 r, m g � 3 n wr di o _ � C B ill . tj M • • a g^ � a � z � vl Rd � ,� �o r 9F /��I Lo F- 61, W S2r O n o i i �S h N!^S'� a " r rL� ..� I M ✓1 Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 3 Case No. ZAl2 -085 ;0 *00 • r♦ 5 T i gg i ; 1 \ �. - s fl r}l4 of � 1 }� _l �ll I �� }�,� ) l �� � • l l E F448 ua a_Y__ cm w Lr) / o b N �k r. a 4 j N V) ry U Fagg i7� r.r N J` e i 6 g$gq Rp a$ t � 4. y y E 5 S Q t iX L" Wi > $ � � Z'v ❑ � �ri £ {n� �r CL O Lr) / o b N �k r. a 4 j N V) ry U r.r N J` e i I r 1 �a i A f > Q i� 4 A • dJ Q U 1V T J V 0 0 0 z t r i F i f f r i I- a U S r gIJ Attachment C Page 4 a l 1- -i SAGE GROUP, INC. ( D� .. S—Wv, T. flow ru: air+ — 1 ' , 1 6 CONC TRAM RlLUreVI%.w aT SOUTjiLaKf. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 5 DAVI5 BLVD THE SOUTH ENTRY � f / , I,^ Case No. ZAl 2-085 fC (40 A JA- I 0 M4 g awn � w Attachment C Page 6 I Ridgeview Decorative Street Items: Price $469 00 Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 7 3 " FLUTED -1B DBC36- 2933 -3X THE RIDGE SITE TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DEVELOPMENT SITE This report addresses the proposed development of The Ridge site - a 13.22 acre site of 31 single family lots. The Ridge site is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard between Southlake Boulevard and Michael Drive. A location map has been included as Figure 1 on the next page of this report. An aerial photograph of the area and a concept plan of the site have been included in the Appendix of this report. Ingress and egress for the site will occur at the site's two proposed driveways on Davis Boulevard. HISTORY OF SITE AND PURPOSE OF STUDY The Ridge site was originally conceived as a mixed use development with both single family lots and medical office buildings. Table 1 has been prepared to summarize the land uses and intensities included in the original concept plan in 2008. A copy of the 2008 concept plan has been included in the Appendix. TABLE 1 2008 Land Uses and Intensities ORIGINAL LAND USE ORIGINAL INTENSITIES Single - Family Residential 24 lots Medical Office Buildings 3 buildings 22,620 totalSquare feet The purpose of conducting this traffic study was to compare the land uses, intensities of the land uses, and the trip generation of the proposed 2012 concept plan to those of the 2008 concept plan. This study purpose was determined through conversations with Gordon Mayer, City Traffic Engineer. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 8 COMPARISON OF LAND USES AND INTENSITIES Table 2 has been prepared to summarize in a side by side comparison the land uses and intensit1 ies of the 2008 and 2012 plans. TABLE 2 Comparison of Land Uses and Intensities LAND USE AND INTENSITY 2008 CONCEPT PLAN 2012 CONCEPT PLAN Single Family Residential 24 lots 31 lots Medical Office Building 22.620 square feet None COMPARISON OF TRIP GENERATION Estimated vehicle trip ends for each plan were calculated utilizing trip generation rates and characteristics collected and compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the eighth edition of their trip generation handbook. Table 3 has been prepared to summarize in a side by side comparison the trip ends projected to be generated by the 2008 and 2012 plans. We have used the ITE rates - whether formula or average rate - that resulted in the higher calculated trip ends. Copies of the ITE data sheets used to develop Table 3 have been attached to this report. TABLE 3 Comparison of Calculated Trip Ends TYPE OF TRIP END 2008 CONCEPT PLAN 2012 CONCEPT PLAN 24 -Hour 1.097 trips per day 354 trips per day Morning Peak Hour 79 trips per hour 31 trips per hour Afternoon Peak Hour 1 107 trips per hour 1 37 trips per hour Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 9 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The results of our comparisons between the 2008 and the 2012 concept plans have been listed below. The 22,620 square feet of medical office buildings in the 2008 plan have been replaced with seven (7) single family residential lots in the proposed 2012 plan. The 2008 plan will generate 743 more trips per day than the proposed 2012 plan. The 2008 plan will generate 48 more trips per hour during the morning peak hour than the proposed 2012 plan. The 2008 plan will generate 70 more trips per hour during the afternoon peak hour than the proposed 2012 plan. CONCLUSION AND CLOSING The currently proposed 2012 concept plan for The Ridge site will generate less vehicular trip ends than the original 2008 plan. As a result the 2012 plan will have a lesser impact on traffic service levels along Davis Boulevard. We have appreciated the opportunity to assist you in the preparation of a traffic study for this proposed residential site in Southlake. Please do not hesitate to contact our office should you have any questions or comments concerning this report. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -085 Page 10 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZAl2 -085 Project Name: Ridgeview at Southlake Review No.: Two Date of Review: 10/12/2012 APPLICANT: Four Peaks — RM, Inc. PLANNING: Sage Group, Inc. Tom Matthews 2600 E. Southlake Blvd. Ste. #120 -323 Curtis Young 1130 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (214) 676 -3434 Phone: (817) 424 -2626 Fax: (817) 481 -4074 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/10/2012 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DANIEL CORTEZ AT (817) 748 -8070. 1. Parking shall be restricted on the "inside" lane around the park located on the south end of the project. Notice of such restriction will be made by the installation of signs reading: "Parking on this side of street is limited to designated parking spaces only ". The specific wording of the signs may change as recommended or approved by the Director of Public Works. Said signs will be created and installed by the developer at the time the project is constructed and whose installation will be a requirement for "Substantial Completion" and City acceptance of the subdivision. Ongoing maintenance of the signs and their replacement, as the case may be, will be the responsibility of the Ridgeview Homeowners Association. Tree Conservation /Landscape Review Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748 -8229 E -mail: kmartin @ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing to preserve four (4) additional existing trees and six (6) marginal trees as compared to the previously approved development Tree Conservation Plan. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. BUFFERYARDS: 1. With a Transitional Zoning District (TZD) the applicant may propose alternative bufferyards as part of the developmental regulations. For Single Family Zoning adjacent to the F.M. 1938 corridor the minimum of a 15' -Q type bufferyard and associated plant material is required to be provided along the west property line adjacent to Davis Boulevard. Public Works /Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Case No. ZAl2 -085 Attachment D Page 1 Phone: (817) 748 -8274 E -mail: aayala @ci.southlake.tx.us Eel Ell ki 121 ZTA Wd97JihTJ14ki 11 &_1 This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. 2. A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department for connections with the City's sewer, water or storm drain inlets. Contact Public Works Operations at (817) 748- 8082. 3. Alignment of the southernmost driveway on Davis Blvd. will need to be aligned center -to- center with the Sonic Driveway. 4. Show the dimensions for the proposed drive, including the median. 5. Provide a preliminary grading plan. 6. The cul -de -sac radius must conform to fire department standards of 50' min. back -to -back. 41' radius is unacceptable. 7. All radii in fire lanes must be 30' minimum. Show the curb return radii at all intersections. 8. Verify width of sidewalk on Davis Blvd. with Master Pathways Plan. 9. Label the proposed right -of -way for all proposed streets. Median openings on Davis Blvd. will need to be surveyed and shown accurately on the plans. Driveway spacing between existing driveways and proposed driveways will need to meet TxDOT's minimum spacing requirements. Street intersections must comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. A drainage easement will be required for access onto and around the detention pond for maintenance. The plat will need to indicate that the Homeowner's Association will be responsible for the maintenance and up -keep of the detention pond. Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW. All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: 1. Fire hydrants and water meters must be located in an easement or right -of -way. 2. Fire hydrants shall be spaced a maximum of 300 linear feet apart. Fire lines are separate from the service lines. !1Ye1 ill 111 Ifell x'69ATiV21 :Z9191►yiIJil21 ill 11 &5 Sewer line on the southern end of Winding Ridge Tr. needs to be extended to the south property line to provide future connection to the property to the south. All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -085 Page 2 1. The difference between pre and post development runoff shall be captured in the detention pond. The proposed detention pond shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events. Calculations must demonstrate how increased runoff from the site is being detained. 2. Verify that the size, shape, and /or location of the detention pond, as depicted on the development plan, will be adequate to meet the detention requirements. Any changes to the size, shape, and /or location of the proposed pond may require a revision to the development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. * Provide information certifying that the detention pond located in the Southlake Wood Subdivision has been sized for fully developed flows from the Ridgeview site. * Calculations will be required to verify that the proposed streets and the proposed curb inlets will be able to convey the volume of storm water at proposed conditions. * The majority of the runoff generated by the proposed site improvements discharges into adjacent storm drain systems. Calculations will be required which demonstrate that the receiving storm drain systems have the capacity necessary to convey the runoff without negatively impacting downstream conditions. Pre and post conditions will need to be analyzed. * A TxDOT Drainage Permit will be required to discharge into the Davis Blvd. storm drain system. Copies of the permit will need to be submitted to the Public Works Department. * All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be RCP. * This property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #18 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($212.61/Acre). * The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" x 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. http:// www. citvofsouthlake. com/ PubIicWorks /engineeringdesign.asp * An access permit from TxDOT is required prior to construction of any driveways on FM 1938. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated, Ordinance No. 836. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements, Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748 -8233 Email: KClements @ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and alternate names as soon as possible. Automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for residences over 6,000 sq.ft. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.3.1.3 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection 14135 Midway Rd. Suite G260 Addison, Tex. 75001 Phone # 214 - 638 -7599. Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -085 Page 3 FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (minimum of 80,000 Ibs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) South end of Winding Ridge and Bluffview does not comply. Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4 as amended and policy dated 05 -27 -93 and updated 07- 18 -97) (For example, Winding Ridge at Bluffiew, both intersections) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: • Relocate fire hydrants to provide required maximum 400 foot spacing between hydrants, which will require adding and relocating hydrants. Hydrants must be provided at all intersecting streets. • Hydrants to have Hydra -Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper outlet for five inch diameter hose. • Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R -3 and U Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un- sprinkled homes and 600 feet for subdivisions that are completely sprinkled. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: • All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the International Fire Code currently amended and adopted. Informational Comments No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. A meeting with the Parks & Recreation Board may be necessary due to the modifications being proposed prior to any permits being issued for the development. Please contact Kari Happold with Community Services at (817) 748 -8018 for further information. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1938. Please note the trails along the F.M. 1938 R.O.W. require a R.O.W. use permit from TxDOT and construction plans must be coordinated with them and the City. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -085 Page 4 S SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZAl2 -085 PROJECT NAME SPIN DISTRICT: MEETING DATE MEETING LOCATION Ridgeview at Southlake SPIN # 10 October 8, 2012; 6:00 PM 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A — 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Six (6) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Ron Evans # 10 • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Curtis Young, Sage Group, Inc., et al (1) • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cortez, Planner ll: (817)748 -8070 or dcortez(a ci. south Iake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard approximately 600 feet south of Southlake Boulevard; and is approximately 13.22 acres. Development Details • Previously approved in 2009 as a Transitional Zoning District (TZD) consisting of residential and office uses. • Proposed amendment to replace the three (3) previously approved commercial office buildings with seven (7) single family residential lots, comparable to the twenty -four (24) single family lots already within the district. Price point for homes approximately $500K. The plan presented at SPIN: 7, 7 rrl - - -- • -_•• D A V I S - B L V D. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -085 Page 1 QUESTIONS 1 CONCERNS • There were no questions or concerns raised following the applicant's presentation. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes, rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -085 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Ridgeview at Southlake 11 d� 9 12 8 10 13 4 7 37 15 27 6 16 26 17 18 30 36 39 5 19 28 20 r35 21 32 4 22 46 23 31 3 24 41 5 44 2 2 1 43 40 SPO # 1. JM Owner Kuelbs, Gregory G Property Address 600 DAVIS BLVD Zoning RE Acreage 3.06 Response NR 2. Kuelbs, Gregory G 504 DAVIS BLVD RE 2.03 NR 3. Kuelbs, Gregory G 500 DAVIS BLVD RE 5.50 NR 4. Key, Dorothy 300 DAVIS BLVD RE 6.09 NR 5. Mantheiy, Joseph Etux Peggy 200 DAVIS BLVD RE 5.08 NR 6. Drews Realty Group 190 DAVIS BLVD SP2 1.35 NR 7. Encore Retail Dev Co Lp 180 DAVIS BLVD SP2 1.56 NR 8. Wendys International Inc 2325 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD C2 0.75 NR 9. Stanley Crossing Lp 2301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD C2 1.34 NR 10. Southlake Dunhill Holdings 1 2225 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD C3 2.59 NR 11. Walmart Real Estate Bus Trust 2201 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD C3 5.84 NR 12. Raio, Steven & Susan M 125 DAVIS BLVD C3 0.85 NR 13. Springs, William A & Jennifer 1908 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.44 NR 14. Harder, Timothy R 1912 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.43 NR 15. Forst, Robert Etux Ginger 1916 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.61 NR 16. Birmingham, James Etux Betsy 1920 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.66 NR 17. Casonhua, Darren Etux Renee 600 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.58 NR 18. Davis, Scott M Etux Mary S 604 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.49 NR 19. Whitman, Eric B Etux Shelly D 608 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.46 NR 20. Mikolasik, Ryan Etux Aimee 612 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.45 NR 21. Stewart, David A Etux Nicole D 616 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.56 NR 22. Griffin, Peter 620 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.52 F 23. Shurtz, Todd R Etux Elizabeth 624 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.50 F 24. Vetter, Bradley G Etux Cynthia 628 HONEYSUCKLE HOLLOW SF20A 0.79 NR 25. Kim, Dean H Etux Margaret 1923 WHITE OAK CLEARING SF20A 0.49 NR Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -085 Page 1 26. Schloss, Duncan M 1915 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.46 NR 27. Igbal, Ahmed Etux Azmat P 1909 SHOOTING STAR LN SF20A 0.46 NR 28. Durant, Thomas Bently 1920 COUNTRY MOSS WAY SF20A 0.55 NR 29. Veerabathina, Sanjay Etux N 1921 BIG BEND COVE SF20A 0.46 NR 30. Koontz, Lana J Etvir Robert 1917 BIG BEND COVE SF20A 0.46 NR 31. Plows, Ian A Etux Soo Nee 1922 WHITE OAK CLEARING SF20A 0.46 NR 32. Wang, Bobby Y Etux Nai -Chia 1917 COUNTRY MOSS WAY SF20A 0.48 NR 33. Drews Realty Group Inc 170 DAVIS BLVD C2 0.24 NR 34. Mantheiy, Joseph Etux Peggy 220 DAVIS BLVD AG 0.72 NR 35. Cosgrove, Mary & J P Sheehey J 519 DAVIS BLVD TZD 1.61 NR 36. Cosgrove, Mary & J P Sheehey J 519 DAVIS BLVD TZD 1.55 NR 37. Venus Partners Vi Lp 505 DAVIS BLVD TZD 3.97 NR 38. Sheehey, John P Jr & Eileen 507 DAVIS BLVD TZD 0.47 NR 39. Cosgrove, Michael P 511 DAVIS BLVD TZD 1.38 NR 40. Chester Assets Ltd 685 DAVIS BLVD AG 12.75 NR 41. Chester Assets Ltd 585 DAVIS BLVD AG 0.95 NR 42. Chester Assets Ltd 605 DAVIS BLVD AG 0.29 NR 43. Chester Assets Ltd 661 DAVIS BLVD AG 1.46 NR 44. Chester Assets Ltd 603 DAVIS BLVD AG 3.02 NR 45. Chester Assets Ltd 601 DAVIS BLVD AG 0.47 NR 46. Cosgrove, Mary S 515 DAVIS BLVD TZD 5.23 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Responses Received: Three (3) - All In Favor Case No. ZAl2 -085 NR: No Response Attachment F Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Notification Response: Form ZAl2 -085 Meeting Date: October 18, 2012 at 8:30 PM Griffin, Peter 520 Honeysuckle Holw South lake Tx, 75092 39619 1 18 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position; Signature: '- 4 Date:, Additional Signature. ! r Date. Printed Name(s): So,-5z4tj Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherevise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -085 Page 1 Lori, I am writing on behaN of the Southlake Lake Woods Homeowners Association and residents in support of :he proposed RidgmAew subdivision. This project is going before P&Zthis evening. The developer (Four Peaks Development) has met with the interested neighbors of Sauthlake Woods, presented basically the same plan that was proposed and approved several years ago and supported strongly b our residents, nut never got off tha ground. The only change to the plan currently is the inclusion of a few more homes, and the removal of the originally proposed office buildings, which the Southlake' -Foods neighbors are very much in favo r of. I have included two letters of support from residents who could not attenb the meeting tonight, and I wish to document the approval and support of the Southlake Woods Homeowners Association. and its 160 h€ rtes for public record. If you would be so kind as to share this with the P &Z Board members and with the members of our City Council and Mayor, I would greatly appraeiate i1, P Ions g call ma if any additional infcnnation is needed. thank you! On Behalf of the Southlake Woods Homeowner's Association and residents, Sincerely, O (8 1 7) 909 8834 President of Southlake Woods Homeowner's Association and resident of Southlake Woods community Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -085 Page 2 Notification ' Response Form ZAl2 -085 Meeting Elate: October 18, 2012 at 6:30 PM Shurtz, Todd R Etux Elizabeth 624 Honeysuckle Holw Southlake Tx, 76092 39619 1 19 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favar of opposed to undecided about . (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: /C.. Date: t Date: Additional Signature: 4 - �j 1 � Printed Name(s): _ 10 t. LI Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at tap. contact the Planning Department. One form per property. 'one Number (optional): Case No. Attachment G ZAl2 -085 Page 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -578a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 2A, 2A1, 2A5C, AND 2A6 IN THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500 AND TRACTS 1 AND 1C, THOMAS J. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1502, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 13.22 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "TZD" TRANSITION ZONING DISTRICT TO "TZD" TRANSITION ZONING DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "TZD" Transition Zoning District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whetherthese changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 2 existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being legally described as Tracts 2A, 2A1, 2A5C, and 2A6 in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 and Tracts 1 and 1C, Thomas J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 13.22 Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 3 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "TZD" Transition Zoning District to "TZD" Transition Zoning District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following conditions: 1. Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012 and the staff report dated October 31, 2012 and noting that the applicant will provide at the 2 nd Reading a restriction limiting front facing garage doors to five homes and that they will have a column spacing in between them and there will be no two side by side and the doors will be made of cedar material to include the motion by Planning & Zoning Commission and will bring back a plan for streetscape, signage, mailbox plan and investigate in removing the northern retention pond and adding entrance and amenity features to the southern entrance of the subdivision. 2. Reserved for approved conditions from 2 nd Reading SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 4 of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 5 affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 6th day of November, 2012. John Terrell, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 4th day of December, 2012. Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 6 John Terrell, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 7 M:/:II:11111i1_YI Being described as Tracts 2A, 2A1, 2A5C, and 2A6 in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 and Tracts 1 and 1C, Thomas J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 13.22 acres, and more fully and completely described by metes and bounds as follows: Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 8 *3:11 M 1 .1 Reserved for Approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment H ZAl2 -085 Page 9