Loading...
Item 6C and 6DSOUTHLAKE 7A19-OR5 v., WL Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council the following is a request for a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Ridgeview at Southlake. ZAl2 -0851 ZAl2 -095 Applicant: Four Peaks — RM, Inc. Owner: Mary S. Cosgrove, Michael P. Cosgrove, and Pat Sheehey Request: Zoning Change and Development Plan for "TZD" Transition Zoning District to "TZD" Transition Zoning District and a Preliminary 'Plat Location: 505 - 519 Davis Blvd. The applicant is requesting a zoning change and development plan from the current "TZD" Transition Zoning District that includes 24 single - family residential lots and 3 general office buildings to a modified "TZD" Transition Zoning District that removes the 3 general office buildings and adds 7 single - family residential lots for a total of 31 residential lots. The development is located at 505 to 519 Davis Boulevard. 2 The future land use designation is Mixed Use. Future Land Use Ridgev iew at South lake ent Mi. Use FUI UM Land Use: Future Land Use LU TYPE •' }� 100 -Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property - -Public ParWOpen space ! - Public/Semi- Public Low Density Residential • - Medium Density Residential Office Commercial ,� - -- - Retail Commercial e _ Mixed Use _ Town Center Regional Retail - Industrial a zoo aoo aoo rexi i j a © r Iy The future land use designation is Mixed Use. The current zoning as previously mentioned is "TZD" Transition Zoning District IL ■ ////{///{{{///�{/ oil 7 , _" ■ The current zoning as previously mentioned is "TZD" Transition Zoning District This is an aerial of the site as it exists today. I "'III I ► y ` 4 P p � Y lG'fea &] Fpm tat 3/ORte� I V 26 1 0 - /sue -f S R I.W D_ .. ... r .. . � And this is the currently approved development plan. As previously stated, there is currently 24 single - family residential lots and 3 general office buildings approved for Ridgeview at Southlake. :. Modifications to Ridgeview • Removal of the 3 General Office Buildings • Approximately 25,807 square feet total of office • Removal of 91 parking spaces • Addition of 7 Residential Lots • Road width of Winding Ridge Trail: • 24 -feet approved • 31 -feet proposed • Tree Preservation • 46.66% Tree Cover Preservation Approved • 51.5% Tree Cover Preservation Proposed • Density Modified • 1.8 d.u. per acre approved • 2.34 d.u. per acre proposed The modifications being proposed to the development consist of the following: [Read Slide] VA City Council • Have a restriction limiting front facing garage doors to five homes with a separating column with no two side by side doors and the garage doors will be made of cedar material - (item 6 Development Standards); • Have a plan for streetscape, signage and mailboxes (Submitted street signage and mailbox designs); • Investigate the removal of the northern retention pond (Revised the site plan with elimination the pond); • Add entrance and amenity features to the southern entrance of the subdivision (Revised south entry plan). Revised Development Standard , �,tbacks: Front Front Facing Garage Side Rear No more than 5, non - consecutive homes shall have 2 single, front facing garage doors. Such doors shall be faced with stained cedar and separated by masonry colunui or wall. (The remaining homes shall be limited to one front facing garage, of similar material). 5' 25• F— F—I F— TZD Development Regulations Min. Lot M. Front Side Rear Max. Lot Max. Size traighl Yard Yard Yard rnm Setback Sedm& Setback Co..... 9,000 s.L I S 15' l S' 1 25 1 60% 75% 6 Wmd i -HEWN �q °'u Fence/Wall Type Locations 3 9 I lU 17.� Qa IS ,6 II 12 z3x.r L 6.. 4 I j I r 6ghhq hoaQ I I r F _ 5 � _ 1 � �� 9 �I' as 27 as 25 i.�,x°, a, ✓ =� L t�emoved Retention PdhUY r s rs L v D And this is the proposed Development Plan. Excluding the modifications as mentioned in the previous slide, all other development regulations would remain the same as previously approved by City Council and are outlined in the zoning booklet that was provided to City Council with your packets. The development regulations as previously approved are as follows: [Read TZD Regulations on slide]. The applicant is showing for all internal streets to have 5 -ffot sidewalks and a 6 -foot sidewalk along Davis Boulevard. [No requirement in Pathways Plan for sidewalk along Davis Boulevard] 10 This would be the south entry. 7 i THE SOUTH ENTR RILKIMM r aT sou'rhLaKe 11 � THE SOUTH ENTRY rose �_ a' orvis eiw THE 5OUTH ENTRY RLDGeVIf'- W aT SOUThLax RI VIC 12 13 U ` 7 ITY OF SOUTHLAKE This concludes staff's presentation. The applicant is present to answer any questions the City Council may have and also has a presentation of their own, are there any questions of staff? 14 F— F—I F— TZD Development Regulations Min. Lot M. Front Side Rear Max. Lot Max. Size traighl Yard Yard Yard rnm Setback Sedm& Setback Co..... 9,000 s.L I S 15' l S' 1 25 1 60% 75% 6 Wmd i -HEWN �q °'u _ - - Fence/Wall Type Locations 3 9 ! lU 17.� Qa ! IS ,6 II L 16I.-. � 4 r6ghhgrhoaQ ! r 1 �t'4• ° ! 29 2e j n 2° zs "'! X 11 ..., d., ''��__ ! t.. '< ;' -_ •M . - D A V I S $ L V D. - - And this is the proposed Development Plan. Excluding the modifications as mentioned in the previous slide, all other development regulations would remain the same as previously approved by City Council and are outlined in the zoning booklet that was provided to City Council with your packets. The development regulations as previously approved are as follows: [Read TZD Regulations on slide]. The applicant is showing for all internal streets to have 5 -ffot sidewalks and a 6 -foot sidewalk along Davis Boulevard. [No requirement in Pathways Plan for sidewalk along Davis Boulevard] 15 This is an aerial with the proposed development plan scaled to fit the location. 16 f � mf f /,J ; .p i t ` k R 1 � t This is an aerial with the proposed development plan scaled to fit the location. 16 i I - <' � � i'r- Tom- " •" t �� A 31 I 3o I as as n ze { ti DM VI S '0LVD. ' This the proposed landscape plan. This plan is identical to the plan that was approved by Council in reference to the tree species located adjacent to the Southlake Woods subdivision. The applicant has indicated to staff they are willing to work with those same adjacent property owners if they would like to see some change to the tree species adjacent to their lots. 17 _ V s , �� — — a DAV I s BLvD- t This is the proposed tree conservation plan. The site has approximately 29% percent tree cover and under this plan the applicant proposes to preserve approximately 51.5% of the tree cover. As previously mentioned the previously approved tree conservation plan preserved approximately 46.6% of the tree cover. W ��,H ELM�, M HOLL . ......... - ............ 2 7 2 LAVIS BLVD. PIRIEUM -Y PLAT .,DG EVCW A�R SOUTK �E II I .. Wr U S ITEJ ------- sft� 19 49eG fFNMG _ �� _ ww i ML'0.Y11fANiCO �...- - - DAV15 BLV � NORTH ENTRY PLANT This is a rendering of the north entry to the development. 20 AI fj00p "` R eW THE N ORTH ENTR 3T 80 hi"t - - 21 5ECTION THRU RIDGMEW PARK R;DUeVIeW And this is a section view of the Ridgeview Park and adjacent residential lots. 22 Planning & Zoning Commission • October 18, 2012; Approved (6 -0) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated October 12, 2012 and Staff Report dated October 18, 2012. This motion also includes the applicant's willingness to include in the CC &R's and making deed restrictions that trees along the east boundary will be maintained in perpetuity at a minimum of 4" caliper with an appropriate enforcement by the HOA if they are not maintained and noting the applicant's willingness to abide by the previously approved CC &R's by City Council on February 17, 2009. • November 8, 2012; Approved (7 -0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated November 2, 2012 and Staff Report dated November 2, 2012. [Read Slide] 23 City Council • Have a restriction limiting front facing garage doors to five homes with a separating column with no two side by side doors and the garage doors will be made of cedar material - (item 6 Development Standards); • Have a plan for streetscape, signage and mailboxes (Submitted street signage and mailbox designs); • Investigate the removal of the northern retention pond (Revised the site plan with elimination the pond); • Add entrance and amenity features to the southern entrance of the subdivision (Revised south entry plan). 24 Revised Development Standard , �,tbacks: Front Front Facing Garage Side Rear No more than 5, non - consecutive homes shall have 2 single, front facing garage doors. Such doors shall be faced with stained cedar and separated by masonry colunui or wall. (The remaining homes shall be limited to one front facing garage, of similar material). 5' 25• 25 F— F—I F— TZD Development Regulations Min. Lot M. Front Side Rear Max. Lot Max. Size traighl Yard Yard Yard rnm Setback Sedm& Setback Co..... 9,000 s.L I S 15' l S' 1 25 1 60% 75% 6 Wmd i -HEWN �q °'u Fence/Wall Type Locations 3 9 I lU 17.� Qa IS ,6 II 12 z3x.r L 6.. 4 I j I r 6ghhq hoaQ I I r F _ 5 � _ 1 � �� 9 �I' as 27 as 25 i.�,x°, a, ✓ =� L t�emoved Retention PdhUY r s rs L v D And this is the proposed Development Plan. Excluding the modifications as mentioned in the previous slide, all other development regulations would remain the same as previously approved by City Council and are outlined in the zoning booklet that was provided to City Council with your packets. The development regulations as previously approved are as follows: [Read TZD Regulations on slide]. The applicant is showing for all internal streets to have 5 -ffot sidewalks and a 6 -foot sidewalk along Davis Boulevard. [No requirement in Pathways Plan for sidewalk along Davis Boulevard] 26 This would be the south entry. i 7 I THE SOUTH ENTR ,k .a RIli�EVIEW ar_ aT souThLaNe 27 � THE SOUTH ENTRY rose �_ a' orvis eiw THE 5OUTH ENTRY RLDGeVIf'- W aT SOUThLax RI VIC i 29 U ` 7 ITY OF SOUTHLAKE This concludes staff's presentation. The applicant is present to answer any questions the City Council may have and also has a presentation of their own, are there any questions of staff? 30 31 32 �.�•' `fit' s� ,+ 4 r� �' , F ,;y: _ .t ,: :r 'iY�'� . 34 .F 35 36 a 37