Item 6BCITY 01
SOUTHLAKE
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
August 29, 2012
CASE NO: ZAl2 -008
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Nolen Office Park Addition
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
REQUEST
DETAILS:
ACTION NEEDED
ATTACHMENTS
STAFF CONTACT:
On behalf of Nolen Medical Investments, LLC and Roger Glenn Williams, Office Equity
Solutions is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Nolen
Office Park Addition on property described as Tracts 11 and 11A, Thomas Easter
Survey, Abstract No. 474, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 300 S.
Nolen Dr., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood # 8.
The request is for approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Nolen Office
Park Addition. The applicant has met with the two adjacent property owner's to the
north regarding Village Center Drive. The applicant is proposing to dedicate half of the
Village Center right -of -way across both lots and pay a roadway impact (street fee) in-
lieu of constructing Village Center Drive.
Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Meeting Report
(E) Plat Review Summary No. 4, dated August 1, 2012
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
Dennis Killough (817)748 -8072
Richard Schell (817)748 -8602
Case No.
ZAl2 -008
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Nolen Medical Investments, LLC and Roger Glenn Williams
APPLICANT: Office Equity Solutions
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 300 S. Nolen Dr.
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION: Tract 11A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY: There is no development history on this property.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on April 9, 2012. A
SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: May 3, 2012; Motion to table the item to the May 17, 2012 meeting was
approved (7 -0).
May 17, 2012; Motion to table the item to the June 7, 2012 meeting was
approved (5 -0).
June 7, 2012; Motion to table the item to the July 19, 2012 meeting was
approved (6 -0).
July 19, 2012; Motion to table the item to the August 9, 2012 meeting was
approved on consent (5 -0).
August 9, 2012; Approved (6 -0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated August 1, 2012.
STAFF COMMENTS: For additional background information, please see the staff report for the
associated Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZAl2 -007). Attached is Plat Review
Summary No. 4, dated August 1, 2012.
Case No. Attachment A
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
Vicinity Map
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Nolen Office Park Addition
F S o � ryCq
k
F 17
9)
w
Q
J
J
Q
m �
N ` �2
L, ZAl2 -008
Preliminary Plat
300 S. Nolen Dr.
N
w ,_ F
0 350 700 1,400
s Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT
II
korx
volume I - C.T
LlendM
Rk �l NO. oxu9xsx977
E 35kW
N 80' '00*
nxx -- ----- ---------- ------------- ------ t le �-1 C
E
w'
354.'
Docu No. 96 .ercss 200 Acres s
D T.C.T 8' LOTI I
3.8 86 .970 Ft
166.1
----- s — _______ 453sltms #lbi___
GZ N0 ,
emn cf,rx wane a.
nog R T.Cj.
fmnR—
Case No.
ZAl2-008
Attachment C
Page 1
R . O . W. —.1.
rcm9: of
— E
N �8940
ALI
----- ---- -------
LOT 2
BLOCK
pk,Mt
rff
II
korx
volume I - C.T
LlendM
Rk �l NO. oxu9xsx977
E 35kW
N 80' '00*
nxx -- ----- ---------- ------------- ------ t le �-1 C
E
w'
354.'
Docu No. 96 .ercss 200 Acres s
D T.C.T 8' LOTI I
3.8 86 .970 Ft
166.1
----- s — _______ 453sltms #lbi___
GZ N0 ,
emn cf,rx wane a.
nog R T.Cj.
fmnR—
Case No.
ZAl2-008
Attachment C
Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.: ZAl2 -007
PROJECT NAME: Nolen Office Park
SPIN DISTRICT: 8
MEETING DATE: April 9, 2012
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Pattie Minder, SPIN #8
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Matt Macleod — Office Equity Solutions
Konstantine Bakintas, P.E. — BHB
J.C. Garcia, P.E. — BHB
• STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Richard Schell (817)748 -8602; rschell @ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation: The property is located at 300 S. Nolen Drive between Southlake Blvd.
(F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane on the west side of Nolen Drive.
w.o.. Eeai co..,�:.e.i i �.0 o.: Eew conErwaa E»n�ro� t �
CEgtlr.inwxcEP E�¢ >l ' ' � {{
t CI. P �-
_ --- _�_ � - _ - - -_ -T
»N METAbE - -- E'wwY
- --------
EE[IE/.
-- - `
- -- ;T11T
r
Q »con+o iall
.k..� ,
row.1�
lil .» iuo :o�.cd.m.2mi »R..c wa.- com rMn»E
�— - ��s ernar w�sn
� cd►»rtiause�ia
AIC.i.
a.»� I EauEEeE. are w�u
w. so
v \ .pvE
C
�anana.a y `�
u�eveaEem»r \ \\��
Development Details: This site is approximately 3.84 -acre lot which is proposed to be a
two -lot office park located on the west side of South Nolen Drive, and approximately 600
feet south of Southlake Boulevard. Development of the first lot, adjacent to South Nolen
Drive, is anticipated to proceed immediately; and the second lot will follow within
approximately one year. The first lot accommodates a 12,000 SF medical office building.
The primary tenant is a colorectal surgeon; the other tenant is anticipated to be an
endocrinologist. The second lot provides another 12,000 SF office building; also for medical
use.
Case No. Attachment D
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
• How many employees will be on staff there?
Approximately 12 staff members.
• What hours will you be operating?
Eight to Five, normal business hours.
• What kind of lighting will there be?
c, Not sure of the exact type, but we do intend on complying with all City lighting
requirements
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.
The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes: rather it serves to inform elected and appointed
officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general
responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the
applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZAl2 -008 Page 2
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZAl2 -007
Review No.: Four
Project Name: Preliminary Plat — Lots 1 and 2, Nolen Office Park Addition
APPLICANT: Matt Macleod
Office Equity Solutions
365 Miron Dr. Suite A
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 416 -3981
E -mail: mmacleod @officeequitysolutions.com
Date of Review: 08/01/12
SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: J.C. Garcia, P.E.
Baird, Hampton and Brown Engineering &
Surveying, Inc.
4550 SH 360, Suite 180
Grapevine, TX
Phone: (817) 338 -1277
E -mail: jcgarcia @bhbinc.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
07/25/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS
KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8072.
All lots must comply with the underlying zoning regulations. Additionally, proper zoning embracing
such plat is required prior to plat approval. As currently zoned the proposed lots do not comply with the
"AG" agricultural zoning. The applicant is requesting a zoning change of S -P -1 for proposed Lot 1 and
is requesting to defer any zoning change on Lot 2 subject to no final plat being approved for the lot
until an appropriate change of zoning is approved.
2. The streets of a proposed subdivision shall conform to the general intent of the approved
Thoroughfare Plan. It will be the responsibility of the City's Engineer to determine final alignment and
related ROW dedications. Half- streets shall be prohibited except where essential to the reasonable
development of the subdivision in conformance with other requirements of this ordinance, and where
the Council finds it will be practicable to obtain dedication when the adjoining land is platted.
3. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01 (A) as amended, requires that every lot shall abut on a
public or private street. Please provide a clear narrative on the intended timing /phasing of street
construction. The alignment of Village Center as shown on the preliminary plat and corresponding site
plan is subject to City Council approval.
4. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: (name of survey and abstract
number; county and state; total acreage; calls match boundary, boundary in heavy line).
a. The POB must be tied to a survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner, or USGS
monument.
b. Show and label all property corners as to type and size of monuments and whether found
or set.
5. The following changes are needed with regard to easements:
a. Provide easements for water, sewer and /or drainage in compliance with approved
construction plans.
b. Provide access easements in accordance with the approved Concept Plan or Site Plan.
Please change all reference to "public" access easement to "common" access easement.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
Public Works /Engineering Review
Alex Ayala
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748 -8274
E -mail: aayalaCaD-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS
The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance #605.
A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department for connections with
the City's sewer, water or storm drain inlets. Contact Public Works Operations at (817) 748 -8082.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
EASEMENTS
Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW.
All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to city standards.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed
Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works
Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist,
standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website.
http:// www. citvofsouthlake. com/ Pub ]icWorks /engineeringdesign.asp
* A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be approved by Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
* For projects containing diversion or impoundment the following note should be placed in the final plat:
Compliance with the provisions of the City's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the
responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086,
Texas Water Code.
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
*= Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
David Barnes
Fire Marshall
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -008 Page 2
Phone: (817) 748 -8233
E -mail: dbarnesCaD-ci.southlake.tx.us
lrlEll ►1 Ell VIA Wd6]JiIJil Ell k11 &1
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 sq.ft. (per 2006 I.F.C.
Sec. 903.2.10.6 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection at 14135 Midway Rd. Suite
G260, Addison, TX, 75001 Phone # 214 - 638 -7599.
Backflow protection for the fire sprinkler system may be in the building at a riser (instead of in a
vault) if the riser is within 100 feet of a water main.
Fire sprinkler systems are required to be monitored for water flow and valve tamper if over 20
sprinkler heads are on a system. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.4 as amended) Submit plans to Reed
Fire Protection at 14135 Midway Rd. Suite G260 Addison, TX, 75001 Phone # 214 - 638 -7599.
Fire department sprinkler connections are to be five inch Storz connections (or equivalent) with 30
degree elbow and a Knox locking cap.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided to within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay" basis. Fire apparatus access, if necessary, needs to be all
weather surface (asphalt or concrete) 24 feet wide and able to support fire apparatus.
Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (minimum of 75,000 Ibs GVW).
Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. (per
2006 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4 as amended and policy dated 05 -27 -93 and updated 07- 18 -97)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrant may be required depending upon building construction type and square footage and
locations of existing hydrants. (per 2009 I.F.C. Section 508.1. as amended)
Hydrants to have Hydra - Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper outlet for
five -inch diameter hose.
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing R -3 and U Occupancies of 400 feet unsprinklered and
600 feet sprinklered. All others are 300 feet unsprinklered and 600 feet sprinklered. Hydrants are
required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above,
measured as the hose would be laid.
The Fire Department connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the
International Fire Code currently amended and adopted.
All commercial buildings are required to have Knox rapid entry system boxes installed. (per 2009
I.F.C. Sec. 506.1 as adopted) Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire
Marshal's Office. FDC connections must have a Knox Locking Cap.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -008 Page 3
A SPIN meeting was held on April 9, 2012.
The plans as submitted will require Council approved variances to driveway stacking and to the
Tree Preservation Ordinance. A variance request letter has been provided.
Placement of Village Center Drive as shown will create a nonconformity with an approved driveway to
the north. Minimum spacing required between a driveway centerline and an intersecting right of way is
200' and the approved drive to the north is approximately 184' away. The City Engineer has approved
the 184' spacing.
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01 (A) as amended, requires that every lot shall abut on
a public or private street.
A 30' front building line is required along both S. Nolen Dr. and the future Village Center. An S -P -1
regulation to allow the 15' building line along Village Center has been added.
The location of Village Center Dr. shown on the Southlake Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan
does not dictate the alignment of the street. The alignment of Village Center Dr. is subject to City
Council approval.
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
It appears that this property lies within the 75 LDN D /FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
Except as otherwise approved under the propose "S -P -1" zoning this development is subject to
"Non- Residential Overlay" requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43 (IV).
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -008 Page 4
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Nolen Office Park
• •
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Res ..
1. Williams, Roger G Etal SP2 Office Commercial 1.56 F
2. S -Si Southlake Two Lp SP2 Office Commercial 2.53 NR
3. Dream 7 Equities Llc C2 Retail Commercial 0.68 NR
4. Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L 01 Retail Commercial 1.59 O
5. Downey Enterprises Llc C2 Retail Commercial 0.92 NR
6. Po, Chin & Whey -Ping PO SF1 -A Mixed Use 3.51 NR
7. Thompson, Teresa Jane SF1 -A Mixed Use 4.09 NR
8. Thompson, Wm B & Kim Koelzer SF1 -A Mixed Use 3.95 NR
9. Btr -8 Southlake Llc SP2 Retail Commercial 5.76 NR
10. Carr, Howard E Jr AG Mixed Use 5.82 NR
11. Shanklin, Harold Est & Richard AG Retail Commercial 4.26 O
12. Williams, Roger Glenn Etal AG Mixed Use 3.59 F
13. White, Elbert Clark Jr AG Mixed Use 15.85 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent:
Responses Received
Thirteen (13)
Three (3)
NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
10
3 5
5
9
11
4
6 1
12 1
1
7 2
2
13
8
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Res ..
1. Williams, Roger G Etal SP2 Office Commercial 1.56 F
2. S -Si Southlake Two Lp SP2 Office Commercial 2.53 NR
3. Dream 7 Equities Llc C2 Retail Commercial 0.68 NR
4. Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L 01 Retail Commercial 1.59 O
5. Downey Enterprises Llc C2 Retail Commercial 0.92 NR
6. Po, Chin & Whey -Ping PO SF1 -A Mixed Use 3.51 NR
7. Thompson, Teresa Jane SF1 -A Mixed Use 4.09 NR
8. Thompson, Wm B & Kim Koelzer SF1 -A Mixed Use 3.95 NR
9. Btr -8 Southlake Llc SP2 Retail Commercial 5.76 NR
10. Carr, Howard E Jr AG Mixed Use 5.82 NR
11. Shanklin, Harold Est & Richard AG Retail Commercial 4.26 O
12. Williams, Roger Glenn Etal AG Mixed Use 3.59 F
13. White, Elbert Clark Jr AG Mixed Use 15.85 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent:
Responses Received
Thirteen (13)
Three (3)
NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent:
Responses Received
Thirteen (13)
Three (3)
NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 1
Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Public Comment Form
Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session.
Name:
�� 1 /
s ^J Gt yZ l�'! 1 G� Date•' ❑
Address QtQ E !P -1/
(Include City and State)
I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item:
Agenda Item # TQ
I will speak in SUPPORT of this item
-1 will speak in OPPOSITION to this item
I do not wish to speak, but please record my
SUPPORT OPPOSITION
❑ Citizen Comments (for an item on this agenda)
s
0
Phone: 5/ �6 - 9 - 1 L )
PF.
U
Signature:
Required, Cards will not be read into the record unless
is signed.
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 2
'lay 13 12 04:43p Larry Cesander 5088395970 p.2
Notification Response Form
ZAl2 -008
Meeting Date: May 3, 2012 at 6:30 PM
Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L
PQ Box 187
Westborough Ma, 01581
152531 1 1 R3
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
In favor of opposed t undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Preliminary Plat referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signa�ure:
Additional Signature:
Date: 6Z
Date:
Printed N ame(s): LULAf QL)CQ- -V'. � Q QP\01U
Must he property owner(s) whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. one form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 3
May 13 12 04:43p Larry Cesander 5088395970 p.3
To: City of Southlake
Planning & Development Services
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
From: Laurence P. Cesander
Post Office Box 187
Westborough, MA. 01581 -0187
Date: May 13, 2012
Re: Nolen Office Park Addition
Zoning Change and Site Plan
As the owner of property that will be significantly and negatively impacted by the proposed
Nolen Office Park Addition, and specifically the proposed "Village Center Drive ", I am opposed
to the approval based in part on the following facts:
• The proposed right of way cuts across undeveloped property until it gets to my
developed property (Lot 1 -R -3, Block 1, Georgetown Park). At my property, instead of
utilizing undeveloped property to the South of my property or to the South of the tract in
question, it cuts into my developed lot.
o This encroachment reduces the size of my lot by dramatically reducing the
vegetation along the back side of my property. This vegetation was part of the
original plan/development/requirements of my property.
o The proposed "Village Center Drive" eliminates 75% of the vegetation I enjoy
along the back side of my property, and vegetation/landscaping that was integral
to the original development. In some parts, the Nolen Office Park Addition
proposal completely eliminates any Iandscape barrier and directly connects to my
parking area.
n This proposal significantly reduces the privacy and quiet enjoyment that was part
of the original development of my property, part of what I purchased, and part of
what my tenants consider a reason they have offices in my building.
o Adding more office space should not come at the expense of undermining the
initial development and requirements of existing office space/development.
• As presented, the proposed "Village Center Drive" would directly connect to my parking
area. My parking area would then become a North/South corridor for traffic between
Southlake Boulevard and the new "Village Center Drive ".
o My parking area is not a road. It is not designed to offer any level of through
traffic. It is simply a parking area, and generally a full parking area at that.
o My parking area is not wide enough to be considered a throughway, there is
parking on both sides, and there is pedestrian traffic from the parking spaces to
my office building on what the Nolen Office Park Addition wants to make a road
through my property.
o My parking area, and the direction this proposal funnels traffic, is not a straight
shot to Southlake Boulevard. My parking area snakes behind my building {south
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 4
May 13 12 04:43p Larry Cesander 5080395970 p.4
side), then along the Bast side of the building, then runs parallel along the front of
my building, and then it takes a sharp turn towards (North/South) Southlake
Boulevard. At Southlake Boulevard there is no access. At this point it requires
another sharp right or left turn through tight parking areas to get out to Southlakc
Boulevard. Any level of additional traffic through these very tight and winding
parking areas would not only be a nuisance to owners, tenants, and customers in
Georgetown Park, it would be outright dangerous.
o My parking area, as well as all of the reads in Georgetown Park are private
driveways and privately maintained. These paved areas were never built or
intended for public traffic. Additional traffic through Georgetown Park would
not only put a significant amount of new, unnecessary and dangerous traffic
through this office complex, it would create an additional and unfair cost burden
on the private owners.
As presented, the proposed "Village Center Drive" cuts across the back part of my
parking area eliminating several valuable parking spots and the location of my dumpster.
I do not have the luxury of losing parking spots. In addition the relocation of the
dumpster would have to come at the cost of a) losing more parking spots, b) moving it to
the front of the building, or c) moving it very close to the back door of the building.
None of these options are acceptable.
Being in the back of this complex, we have already experienced break -ins and burglaries.
Additional precautions have been taken including heightened security systems, new
lighting, and the removal & relocation of trees blocking visibility to the front of the
building. One current deterrent is the visibility along the front of our building from the
North/South Georgetown Park driveway and the path that anyone committing a crime
would have to take as an escape route. Currently, anyone committing a crime on my
property would have to complete this long, visible drive and then exit on Southlake
Boulevard. Connecting my parking area in the back to a less - traveled, less- visible, less -
policed side road will no doubt increase crime and burglaries to my building.
Please do not approve this proposal as presented. However, I would be supportive of this
Proposal if it did not cut across the back of my property, reduce my protective vegetation &
landscaping buffer, connect to my parking area, or place any additional traffic through
Georgetown Paris.
Thank you for this consideration,
S`ncere�
! C� J
Laurence P. Cesander
508- 839 -9205 (office)
508 -839- 5970(fax)
413- 388 -1099 (cell)
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 5
Mai 13 12 G4z44p Larry Cesander 5088395970 P.5
111 Ul 13114 1, . j!Jillillill
t It
4 .i ��!•.i l.I�
li 1; 1
J ill I
.1 A
gql
1, lit!
1
MI A
77
11 ra.
q
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2-008 Page 6
Ma-" 13 12 04:49p Larry Gesander 5088395970 p.6
r
I
,
r
J T
1
i
' P
888 r
t +�
R
r �
k�
I
}
iii
'
s a
lit
511
r
I
,
r
J T
1
i
' P
888 r
t +�
R
r �
a
'
s a
rl
if:
511
0 .y Y
7 .
r
,
r
•
r
I
,
r
J T
1
i
' P
888 r
t +�
R
r �
m t
b �
,
I
Y$
di ' I ; I %t'F
A ll
t c - -- L�
ITITT
RA
NOR
TT
P
„ I i
r i iliilf �`; m
8 j a
a
'
s a
rl
if:
m t
b �
,
I
Y$
di ' I ; I %t'F
A ll
t c - -- L�
ITITT
RA
NOR
TT
P
„ I i
r i iliilf �`; m
8 j a
SITE OEVELOPI ISATPLAN Office Equity Solutions
w ♦ rr��rsr
�t�.I QTFICE PARK uu. RtY61016 aR n�i...�
JIIAS E L.T _ S, ., , ARBTRRLT NO, EF4 a Q D Bprd HAmPt4n /Ji �'OYJR. h
SOUTHLAI�TJUtRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 0.a.�z Prwt en n: � .•w «�rv.. �yir.
Jce
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 7
0 .y Y
r
,
r
•
�{' 1
�,\
•1 �� g '
� gx R
g Pi
Y �.
I
SITE OEVELOPI ISATPLAN Office Equity Solutions
w ♦ rr��rsr
�t�.I QTFICE PARK uu. RtY61016 aR n�i...�
JIIAS E L.T _ S, ., , ARBTRRLT NO, EF4 a Q D Bprd HAmPt4n /Ji �'OYJR. h
SOUTHLAI�TJUtRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 0.a.�z Prwt en n: � .•w «�rv.. �yir.
Jce
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 7
May 18, 2012
Dennis Killough, AICP, Deputy Director
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Soutlilake, Texas 76092
Tel 817 -748 -8072
RE: NOLEN OFFICE PARK
Medical Office Building Development
So. Nolen Drive, Southlake
Mr. Kdlough:
As you know, we own the tract of land on So. Nolen Drive and recently sold a portion of the property to
Nolen Medical Investments; and our property abuts the West property line of the proposed Nolen Office
Park development. Please be informed ihat we are familiar with this proposed project, and are writing to
express our support of this medical office development.
We've met with Office Equity Solutions and have been provided with a complete set of their preliminary
plans and dieir project narrative. We understand the City's 1030 Plan proposes Village Center Drive be
extended from Nolen Drive westward, and we believe the proposed alignment is reasonable.
We also understand that the proposed roadway alignment requires a smart right -of -way dedication from our
property; and we are prepared to provide it.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you, t
'� 1
l
9 't-+
Roger Williams
Tel: 71' q 0 pp
(� 31 q
CC: Office Equity Solutions
e:12011.000.000QDI 1.719.000Ndocskite plan appliwion package%shanklm ldtc, * sa.dike.don
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 8
July ?, 2012
Dennis Killough, AICP, Deputy Director
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
Tel 817- 748 -8072
RE: NOLEN OFFICE PARK
Medical Office Building Development
So. Nolen Drive, Southlake
Mr. Killough:
As you know, we own the tract of land, on the east side of South Nolen Drive, directly across the street from
the referenced project. Our property, known as Lot 1 R Cornerstone Business Park, was recently re -zoned
(ZA11 -027) with a concept plan.
We are writing to again document our support of the proposed Nolen Office Park project; and to
acknowledge that their proposed drive approach cannot lineup exactly with the drive approach shown on our
concept plan.
We understand that when our project proceeds to the site planning stage, we may need to shift our drive
approach to line -up with theirs. We have no objections to accommodating a small shift of our approach, and
support their development as submitted.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you,
Roger Williams
Tel 817- 489 -3141
CC: Office Equity Solutions
x1201 L000,000120I I 714.D001dccslsite plan application packagdwilliams Ictter to souilake.docx
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -008 Page 9