Item 6ACITY 01
SOUTHLAKE
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
August 29, 2012
CASE NO: ZAl2 -007
PROJECT: Zoning Change & Site Plan for Nolen Office Park
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Nolen Medical Investments, LLC, Office Equity Solutions is requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "S -P -1"
Detailed Site Plan District for Nolen Office Park on property described as Tract 11A,
Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and
located at 300 S. Nolen Dr., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood # 8.
REQUEST
DETAILS: The proposed zoning change and site plan allows for the construction of an
approximately 12,000 square foot medical office building on an approximately 1.996
acre tract of land.
The applicant has met with the two adjacent property owner's to the north regarding
Village Center Drive (see Project Description in Attachment C). The applicant is
proposing to dedicate half of the Village Center right -of -way (across both lots),
construct a new drive approach onto S. Nolen Dr. as shown on the Site Plan, and to
pay a roadway impact (street fee) in -lieu of constructing Village Center Drive.
The proposed "S -P -1" uses and regulations are based on the "O -1" Office District uses
and regulations with the following exceptions:
Additional Uses
Supporting health service fields; i.e. medical specialists, dialysis clinic, medical
imaging, physical therapy, audio therapy, speech therapy, prescription pharmacy
Develooment Reaulations
Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. If the lot
fronts two streets, the front yard setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet
adjacent to one of the two streets.
Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than ten (10) feet.
Building Articulation: Articulation will be as shown on the site plan and elevations.
Parking: Parking shall be provided at the ratio of one parking space per every 164
square feet of floor area.
Case No.
ZAl2 -007
Tree Preservation
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
ACTION NEEDED
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
For property sought to be zoned "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District, the City Council
shall consider the application for a Tree Conservation Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application. The applicant is proposing that approximately
21.8% of the existing tree canopy be preserved as shown on the Tree Conservation
Plan.
The property owner to the north is in opposition and he represents more than twenty
percent (20 %) of the 200' buffer area. A supermajority vote will be required for
approval.
1) A variance is requested to reduce the driveway stacking depth for both driveways
from the required seventy -five (75) feet to fifty (50) feet as shown on the
submitted Site Plan.
2) A variance is requested to reduce the driveway separation from the Village
Center intersection at S. Nolen Dr. from 200 feet to 150 feet per the Site Plan.
1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Meeting Report
(E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated August 15, 2012
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G) Ordinance No. 480 -619
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
Dennis Killough (817)748 -8072
Richard Schell (817)748 -8602
Case No.
ZAl2 -007
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
/e1 »I[91ALl116
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
LAND USE CATEGORY:
CURRENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING
I:I6 to] Zvi
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN
Case No.
ZAl2 -007
Nolen Medical Investments, LLC
Office Equity Solutions
300 S. Nolen Dr.
Tract 11A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474
Mixed Use
"AG" Agricultural District
"S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District
There is no development history on this property.
Consolidated Land Use Plan
The underlying land use designation of this property is "Mixed Use ". The
proposed office development is consistent with the recommended scope of
uses under the "Mixed Use" land use designation.
In addition, this property is included in the Crooked /Kimball Small Area Plan.
The Small Area Plan recommends master planning of the mixed use area, with
the preference to have lower intensity uses in the vicinity of the subject
property.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan do not show any trail or
sidewalk segments adjacent to the proposed site, however, five (5) foot
sidewalks are required along all adjacent public streets with all developments
requiring a City Council approved site plan. The required sidewalks are shown
on the site plan along Village Center Drive and Nolen Drive.
Attachment A
Page 1
I I :7 _ 1 ki 61 10] :4 f_ l 1101 ki
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan & Median Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Nolen Drive to be a three lane
undivided arterial with seventy (70) feet of right -of -way north of the
intersection with Crooked Lane. The Plan recommends Village Center Drive
to be a two lane undivided collector with sixty (60) feet of right -of -way.
However, the Crooked /Kimball Small Area Plan includes a recommendation
to "consider the creation of a new 60' ROW 2 -lane divided collector (C2D)
with medians and left- turn /stacking lanes at intersections in the Mobility Plan
to apply to the Village Center Extension roadway ".
Existin_g Area Road Network and Conditions
Nolen Drive is currently a four lane facility adjacent to the subject property.
Village Center Drive has not been constructed east of Kimball Avenue.
Traffic Count
Traffic Impact
Current Proposal
Medical - Dental Office Buildin
12,000 1 434 1 29 1 15 1 21 1 32
WATER & SEWER: The water line to be constructed with this development is proposed to connect
to the future 8" Water Line on Village Center Drive. The sewer line to be
constructed with Phase 1 of this development is proposed to connect to the
existing 8" sewer line at the intersection of S. Nolen Dr. and Crooked Ln.
TREE PRESERVATION: For property sought to be zoned "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District, the City
Council shall consider the application for a Tree Conservation Plan in
conjunction with the corresponding development application. The applicant is
proposing that approximately 21.8% of the existing tree canopy be preserved.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on April 9, 2012. A
SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: May 3, 2012; Motion to table the item to the May 17, 2012 meeting was
approved (7 -0).
Case No. Attachment A
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
The AM /PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times
on S. Nolen Dr.
*Vehicle Trips per Day
May 17, 2012; Motion to table the item to the June 7, 2012 meeting was
approved (5 -0).
June 7, 2012; Motion to table the item to the July 19, 2012 meeting was
approved (6 -0).
July 19, 2012; Motion to table the item to the August 9, 2012 meeting was
approved on consent (5 -0).
August 9, 2012; Approved (6 -0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated August 1, 2012 with the 2 requested variances; 1) the reduction in the
stacking depth for the driveways from 75 -ft. to 50 -ft. and 2) reducing the
separation between Village Center intersection with the driveway from 200 -ft.
to 150 -ft. per the site plan.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 21, 2012; Approved at 1 reading (4 -0) approving the two variances,
the first being to driveway stacking from the required seventy -five (75) feet to
fifty (50) feet for both driveways and the second being to reduce the driveway
separation from the Village Center intersection at S. Nolen Dr. from 200 feet to
150 feet per the site plan and subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4
dated August 1, 2012.
STAFF COMMENTS: The property owner to the north is in opposition and he represents more than
twenty percent (20 %) of the 200' buffer area. A supermajority vote will be
required for approval.
Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated August 15, 2012.
Case No. Attachment A
ZAl2 -007 Page 3
Vicinity Map
Nolen Office Park
F �
SOOT y`AkF 8
Vp (FNj 1,
w
Q
J
J
a
m
Y
N
ZAl2 -007
Zoning Change and Site Plan
300 S. Nolen Dr.
N
C
00
0 350 700 1,4
S Feet
Case No.
ZAl2 -007
Attachment B
Page 1
r * *] ki IIki [Hki /_1N0li %I1T /4
a F 0
a o
Baird, Hampton &Brown, Inc. Q Engineering & Surveying
August 1, 2012
Dennis Killough, AICP, Deputy Director
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
Tel 817- 748 -8072
RE: NOLEN OFFICE PARK
Medical Office Building Development
So. Nolen Drive, Southlake
Mr. Killough:
Submitted herewith are the revised /conformed Zoning, Site Plan and Preliminary Plat documents for Nolen
Office Park; a proposed medical office building development on South Nolen Drive. These plans, and the
associated supporting documentation, are provided for consideration by Planning & Zoning and the City
Council.
The applicant is Office Equity Solutions (OES). With over 30 years of experience in the business, OES are
specialists in office and retail development and leasing. They are a local firm, with offices on Miron Street,
and will be represented by us, Baird, Hampton & Brown — Engineering & Surveying (BHB). Additional
information on OES is available on their website; www.officeegtiitysolutions.com
In the following paragraphs, we've tried to address the development issues that have been identified thus far:
This 3.84 -acre, two -lot, office park is located on the west side of South Nolen Drive, and approximately 600
feet south of Southlake Boulevard. Development of the first lot, adjacent South Nolen Drive, is anticipated to
proceed immediately; and we understand, the second lot will follow at a later date.
The first lot accommodates a 12,000 SF medical office building. The primary tenant is a colorectal surgeon;
the other tenant is anticipated to be a dermatologist. The second lot provides another 12,000 SF office
building; also for medical use.
2030 Plan Village Center Drive, a 2 -lane undivided roadway, is planned to extend along this development's
north property line. The proposed roadway is anticipated to provide a 40 -ft pavement within a 60 -ft right -of-
way. We've met with the two adjacent property owners to the north, who will also be impacted by this
proposed roadway, coordinated with city staff, and identified an alignment for Village Center Drive that we
believe is reasonable and consistent with the 2030 Plan. Please refer to the submitted Plat and Site
Development Plan.
DELIVERING INNOVATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevine, TX 76051 / Tel: 817 - 251 -8550 Fax: 817 - 251 -8810 / TBPE Finn #44
w-ww.BHBINC.com
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 1
Denlm's Killough, AICP
August 1, 2012
Page 2
Zo 1�lin : The current zoning is AG (agricultural) and the future land use is noted as Mixed Use. This
development proposes to rezone the front lot from AG to SP -1 Site Plan Zoning District with an underlying
zoning of Office District. The remaining lot will be rezoned at a later date. Specifics on the SP -1 Zoning are
described in the enclosed document, titled Nolen Office Park SP -1 Detailed Site Plan Zoning_
Site Plan To accompany the SP -1 Site Plan Zoning application, a complete and detailed Site Plan set of
drawings has been prepared for Lot 1. This includes a Site Plan, a Preliminary Drainage Analysis, a
Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan, a Preliminary Utility Plan, a Tree Conservation Plan, a Landscape Plan
and Building Elevations. Additionally, a conceptual layout has been provided for Lot 2. We are seeking a Site
Plan approval for Lot 1; zoning and site plan applications for Lot 2 will be submitted at a later date.
Plate The development has prepared a Preliminany Plat for the overall 3.84- acres; dividing the property
into two lots, and identifying the proposed right- of-way dedication for Village Center Drive. A Final Plat for
the front lot will be submitted upon approval of the Site Plan. The back lot will be platted /developed at a
later date.
We understand construction of Village Center Drive, as proposed on our Site Plan, will require right- of-way
dedication by this development's Lot 1 and Lot 2; and we are prepared to dedicate this right- of-way at this
time. Please refer to the preliminary plat and enclosed letter from Mr. Williams (owner of Lot 2).
Village Center Drive We've had numerous discussions and meetings with the two adjacent property owner's
to the north regarding Village Center Drive... Both Mr. ShankEn and Mr. Cesander have indicated that they
support our development, but are not interested in dedicating their right -of -way at this time. Furthermore,
we've not been successful 111 negotiating a reasonable fee to acquire their half of the right -of -way.
Therefore, we propose to dedicate our half of the sight- of-way (across both lots), construct a new drive
approach, onto S_ Nolen Drive, as shown on the Site Development Plan; and to pay a roadway impact (street
fee) ill -lieu of constructing Village Center Drive. We will also escrow for the sidewalk along Village Center
Drive.
This new /proposed drive approach is located 150 -ft away from the future Village Center Drive; which is the
minimum separation distance (intersection to driveway) for a collector grade roadway. S. Nolen Drive is
classified as an arterial from E. Southlake Boulevard to Crooked Lane, and as a collector south of Crooked
Lane. The separation distance for an arterial is 2.00 - ft; however, we believe 150 - is reasonable at this
location; approximately +330 -ft from Crooked Lane.
Please note that the proposed drive approach does not align directly across the street from a future driveway
recently approved as part of a zoning change with concept plan (No. ZA11 -027). Furthermore, we are not
able to shift the proposed drive approach far enough south to align with the future driveway. To address this
offset, we've coordinated with the owner, and have determined that the future driveway may be shifted to
align with our proposed drive approach. Please refer to enclosed letter from Mr. Williams, owner of the
property across the street.
Public Infrastructure As part of this first phase of the development we anticipate constructing (1) a public
sidewalk along S. Nolen Drive, (2) a public water line, and (3) a pubic sanitary sewer line. Please refer to the
enclosed Site Plan and Preliminary Utility Site Plan for clarification and alignment of the proposed
infrastructure.
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevule, TX 76051 / Tel: 817 -251 -8550 Fax: 817 -251 -8810 / TBPE Firm #44
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
Dennis Killough, AICP
August 1, 2012
Page 3
Furthermore, a storm drain system, that captures on -site storm water runoff and conveys it to an existing
public drainage easement, will also be constructed; please refer to the Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan.
SPIN Meeting Our project is located in SPIN #8; we've contacted the SPIN Representative, and
attended /participated m a SPIN Meeting on April 9th.
With this application, we respectfully request consideration of the following two variances:
1. Reduce the driveway stacking depth from 75 -ft to 50 -ft, per the submitted Site Development Plan.
2. Reduce the intersection to driveway separation distance from 200 -ft to 150 -ft per the Site Dev. Plan.
Item 1, the stacking depth requirement is driven by the number of parking spaces and number of driveways.
Until Village Parkway is constructed, and depending upon the timing of the development of Lot 2, the total
number of parking spaces per available driveway (to Village Parkway and S. Nolen Drive) triggers a need to
provide a stacking depth of 75 -ft. Please note the proposed driveway provides for left -turn and right -turn out
lanes, and consider allowing for a 50 -ft stacking depth onto S. Nolen Drive and Village Parkway.
Item 2, the intersection to driveway separation distance, is triggered by the classification of S. Nolen as an
arterial; however, S. Nolen is classified as a collector approximately ±240 -ft. east of this location.
In addition, we are aware of the following two site plan development regulations requiring approval:
A. Reduce the parking requirements from 82 (1 space per 146 SF) to 73 (1 space per 164 SF of Bldg.).
B. Reduce the tree preservation requirement from 40% to 22% per the submitted Tree Conservation Plan.
Our ability to provide the required number of parking spaces (Item A), is limited by significant site layout
revisions to accommodate a new drive approach onto S. Nolen Drive. Had we been successful obtaining the
required off -site right -of -way, then we would have been able to meet the required parking count. However,
and based upon our experience with similar facilities, a parking ratio of 1 space per 164 SF of building is
reasonable.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call; I may be reached at 817 - 251 -8550 x301.
Thank you,
BHB Engineering & Surveying
� 1( aD
Konstantine Bakintas, P.E.
Principal, Sr. Civil Enguieer
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevine, TX 76051 / TeL 817 - 251 -8550 Fax: 817- 251 -8810 / TBPE Firm #44
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 3
Deflnis Killough, AICP
August 1, 2012
Page 4
Enclosure: Nolen Office Park SP -1 Zoning
Site Plan (Package Set of Plans)
Mr. Williams Right -of -Way Letter — May 2012
Mr. Williams Driveway Letter -Jul 2012
CC: Office Equity Solutions
e:\ 2011. 000 .000 \2011.719.001 \dots \project d —ipd.. foa s ,W.ke - jW'12.d-
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevine, TX 76051 / Tel: 817- 251 -8550 Fax: 817 -251 -8810 / TBPE Firm 444
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 4
PROPOSED S -P -1 REGULATIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS
a n � o L
a o 3
Baird, Hampton & Brow, Inc. Q Engineering & Surveying
Nolen Office Park
SP- I Detailed Site Plan Zoning
Page 1 of 2
This SP -1 Detailed Site Plan Zoning district is a commercial category designed and
intended for the exclusive use of medical office and professional office and office related
activities. It is established with the base zoning criteria stipulated in 0-1 Office District
zoning per Section 18 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance.
18.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT — Per 0-1 Office District
18.2 PERMITTED USES - Per 0-1 Office District with the following revisions:
a. Additional Uses — Supporting health service fields; i.e. medical specialists,
dialysis clinic, medical imaging, physical therapy, audio therapy, speech therapy,
prescription pharmacy.
18.3 ACCESSORY USES - Per 0-1 Office District
18.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Per 0-1 Office District
18.5 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - Per 0-1 Office District with the following revisions:
b. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. If the Lot fronts
two streets, the front yard setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet adjacent one of the
two streets.
d. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than ten (10) feet.
j. Building Articulation: Building articulation shall be as shown on the building
elevations.
18.6 ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS OR USES LYING
WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FEET (400') OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY Per 0-1 Office District — Not Applicable
18.7 SITE PLAN - Per 0-1 Office District
18.8 SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES - Per 0-1 Office District
DELIVERING INNOVATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevine, TX 76051 / Tel: 817 - 251 -8550 Fag: 817 - 251 -8810 / TBPE Firm #44
www.BHBINC.com
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 5
Nolen Office Park
SP -1 Detailed Site Plan Zoning
Page 2 of 2
SITE PLAN REGULATIONS
1. Reduce the parking requirements from 82 (1 space per 146 SF) to 73 (1 space per 164 SF of
Bldg.) per the submitted Side Development Plan.
2. Reduce the tree preservation requirement from 40% to 22% per the submitted Tree
Conservation Plan.
PLAN VARIANCE REQUESTS -
1. Reduce the driveway stacking depth from 75 -ft to 50 -ft per the submitted Site Development
Plan.
2. Reduce the intersection to driveway separation distance from 200 -ft to 150 -ft per the Side
Development Plan
e:\ 2011.000 .00012011.719.0011docs \sp -1 detailed site plan zoning.docx
4550 S.H. 360, Suite 180, Grapevine, TX 76051 / Tel: 817- 251 -8550 Fax: 817 - 251 -8810 / TBPE Firm 944
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2 -007 Page 6
SITE PLAN
BUFFERYARD SCHEDULE
N
SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
L ---- - - - - -
�,£
- - -- - -- - -- - --
aew
r��
RON a
1 0 MA 1,
=NT
C9
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl2-007 Page 7
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.: ZAl2 -007
PROJECT NAME: Nolen Office Park
SPIN DISTRICT: 8
MEETING DATE: April 9, 2012
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Pattie Minder, SPIN #8
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Matt Macleod — Office Equity Solutions
Konstantine Bakintas, P.E. — BHB
J.C. Garcia, P.E. — BHB
• STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Richard Schell (817)748 -8602; rschell @ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation: The property is located at 300 S. Nolen Drive between Southlake Blvd.
(F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane on the west side of Nolen Drive.
w.o.. Eeai co..,�:.e.i i �.0 o.: Eew conErwaa E»n�ro� t �
CEgtlr.inwxcEP E�¢ >l ' ' � {{
t CI. P �-
_ --- _�_ � - _ - - -_ -T
»N METAbE - -- E'wwY
- --------
EE[IE/.
-- - `
- -- ;T11T
r
Q »con+o iall
.k..� ,
row.1�
lil .» iuo :o�.cd.m.2mi »R..c wa.- com rMn»E
�— - ��s ernar w�sn
� cd►»rtiause�ia
AIC.i.
a.»� I EauEEeE. are w�u
w. so
v \ .pvE
C
�anana.a y `�
u�eveaEem»r \ \\��
Development Details: This site is approximately 3.84 -acre lot which is proposed to be a
two -lot office park located on the west side of South Nolen Drive, and approximately 600
feet south of Southlake Boulevard. Development of the first lot, adjacent to South Nolen
Drive, is anticipated to proceed immediately; and the second lot will follow within
approximately one year. The first lot accommodates a 12,000 SF medical office building.
The primary tenant is a colorectal surgeon; the other tenant is anticipated to be an
endocrinologist. The second lot provides another 12,000 SF office building; also for medical
use.
Case No. Attachment D
ZAl2 -007 Page 1
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
• How many employees will be on staff there?
Approximately 12 staff members.
• What hours will you be operating?
Eight to Five, normal business hours.
• What kind of lighting will there be?
c, Not sure of the exact type, but we do intend on complying with all City lighting
requirements
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.
The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes: rather it serves to inform elected and appointed
officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general
responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the
applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZAl2 -007 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 08/15/12
Project Name: Site Plan — Nolen Office Park
APPLICANT: Matt Macleod
Office Equity Solutions
365 Miron Dr. Suite A
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 416 -3981
E -mail: mmacleod @officeequitysolutions.com
SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: J.C. Garcia, P.E.
Baird, Hampton and Brown Engineering &
Surveying, Inc.
4550 SH 360. Suite 180
Grapevine, TX
Phone: (817) 338 -1277
E -mail: jcgarcia @bhbinc.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/02/12 AND
08/15/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE
CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU
HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817)
748 -8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8072.
Revise the site plan to remove a tower feature west of the main entrance on the south side of the
building or provide elevations that show the tower feature.
2. Relocate the driveway on S. Nolen Dr. away from the power pole line shown in the driveway or
relocate the pole with construction.
3. The following issues pertain to Village Center Drive:
a. The proposed Village Center Drive alignment straddles two properties. Acquisition of right -
of -way from the adjoining property owners to the north will be required.
b. All lots must front on a street. Applicant proposes to pay impact fees in lieu of constructing
Village Center Dr.
4. Show the relocated 10' X 50' off - street loading space on all plans. The applicant has provided a
site plan showing the loading space relocated out of the fire lane to a space that was previously
shown as a sidewalk area along the west side of the building. This site plan is included in the staff
report and PowerPoint presentation, but the full size copies were printed before the change was
made.
Tree Conservation /Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748 -8229
E -mail: kmartin @ci.southlake.tx.us
IN: 721410101L l R]21 :1VA1[07►[d01ky,IJi14ki11&1
For property sought to be zoned "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Tree Conservation Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development
application. The applicant is proposing that approximately 21.8% of the existing tree canopy be
preserved.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 1
2. The existing tree cover preservation calculations include the area and existing trees within the
proposed public right -of -way. The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall
exclude any area in public rights -of -way as approved by City Council.
3. The 10" Elm ( #216) tree proposed to be preserved on the west corner of the access drive from the
proposed right -of -way will most likely be altered by the proposed waterline.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHARTS:
Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for the north bufferyard, south bufferyard, and interior
landscape required plantings. Please ensure that the existing trees taken credit for can be and are
properly preserved in order to take the existing tree credits. Any altered trees will not count toward
existing tree credits.
2. The parking lot landscape island in the row of parking spaces south of the building is smaller in
width than the required 12'. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back -to -back if
curbed or 13' edge -to -edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking
stall.
3. Shrubs, ornamental grasses, ground cover or a combination of these plant materials need to be
placed in the two (2) proposed landscape areas at the ends of the parking spaces on the west end of
the property.
4. The required bufferyard plant material does not have to be directly within the confines of the bufferyard
area as long as it is in the general area and serves the same purpose.
# Indicates required items.
Indicates informational items.
Public Works /Engineering Review
Alex Ayala
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748 -8274
E -mail: aayalaCaD-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS
A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department for connections with
the City's sewer, water or storm drain inlets. Contact Public Works Operations at (817) 748 -8082.
2. The turnaround radius must conform to fire department standards of 50' min and all fire lane radii must
be 30' minimum.
3. The curb return radius for driveways must be 30' minimum.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
4. Show proposed sidewalks along S. Nolen Dr. and Village Center. Must comply with TDLR/ADA
accessibility standards. The Architectural Site plan will need to be submitted to TDLR for review.
Street intersections must comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments.
This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
EASEMENTS
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15'
minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
2. Additional right -of -way will be needed at the Georgetown Park property when Lot 2, Block 1 is
developed.
The fire hydrants and water meters must be located in an easement or right -of -way.
Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW.
All waterlines and sewer lines in public easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards.
WATER COMMENTS
1. Verify spacing between proposed fire hydrant and the future fire hydrant at the intersection of Village
Center Drive. Fire hydrants shall be spaced at a maximum of 300 linear feet apart, or 600 linear feet if
buildings contain a sprinkler system.
The fire lines need to be separate from the service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS
1. The sewer needs to be extended north to the property line.
All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS
1. The documentation, record drawings and any calculations which demonstrate that detention is not
required should be included as part of the construction drawings submittal and labeled "For
Information Purposes Only ". Contact the Public Works Department for record drawings at (817) 748-
8082.
2. A flood study to prove that detention is not required may be needed as part of the civil construction
plan submittal.
3. The culvert under the driveway will need to be sized to convey the 100 year storm.
4. Drainage divides are difficult to read; they blend in with surrounding lines.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 3
All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be RCP.
The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream
properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
Submit 5 sets of the civil construction plans (22 "x34" full size sheets) and a digital set of half size
sheets (11 "x17 ") with a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review
directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent
construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's
website.
http:// www. citvofsouthlake. com/ Pub ]icWorks /engineeringdesign.asp
A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake
for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the
Performance and Payment Bond in any way.
Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated, Ordinance No. 836.
Fire Department Review
David Barnes
Fire Marshall
Phone: (817) 748 -8233
E -mail: dbarnesC@-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 sq.ft. (per 2006 I.F.C.
Sec. 903.2.10.6 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection at 14135 Midway Rd. Suite
G260, Addison, TX, 75001 Phone # 214 - 638 -7599.
Backflow protection for the fire sprinkler system may be in the building at a riser (instead of in a
vault) if the riser is within 100 feet of a water main.
Fire sprinkler systems are required to be monitored for water flow and valve tamper if over 20
sprinkler heads are on a system. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.4 as amended) Submit plans to Reed
Fire Protection at 14135 Midway Rd. Suite G260 Addison, TX, 75001 Phone # 214 - 638 -7599.
Fire department sprinkler connections are to be five inch Storz connections (or equivalent) with 30
degree elbow and a Knox locking cap.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided to within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay" basis. Fire apparatus access, if necessary, needs to be all
weather surface (asphalt or concrete) 24 feet wide and able to support fire apparatus.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 4
Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (minimum of 75,000 Ibs GVW).
Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. (per
2006 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4 as amended and policy dated 05 -27 -93 and updated 07- 18 -97)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrant may be required depending upon building construction type and square footage and
locations of existing hydrants. (per 2009 I.F.C. Section 508.1. as amended)
Hydrants to have Hydra -Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper outlet for
five -inch diameter hose.
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing R -3 and U Occupancies of 400 feet unsprinklered and
600 feet sprinklered. All others are 300 feet unsprinklered and 600 feet sprinklered. Hydrants are
required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above,
measured as the hose would be laid.
The Fire Department connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the
International Fire Code currently amended and adopted.
All commercial buildings are required to have Knox rapid entry system boxes installed. (per 2009
I.F.C. Sec. 506.1 as adopted) Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire
Marshal's Office. FDC connections must have a Knox Locking Cap.
A SPIN meeting was held on April 9, 2012.
Placement of Village Center Drive as shown will create a nonconformity with an approved driveway to
the north. Minimum spacing required between a driveway centerline and an intersecting right of way is
200' and the approved drive to the north is approximately 184' away. The City Engineer has approved
the 184' spacing.
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01 (A) as amended, requires that every lot shall abut on
a public or private street.
A 30' front building line is required along both S. Nolen Dr. and the future Village Center. An S -P -1
regulation to allow the 15' building line along Village Center has been added.
The location of Village Center Dr. shown on the Southlake Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan
does not dictate the alignment of the street. The alignment of Village Center Dr. is subject to City
Council approval.
For property sought to be zoned "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Tree Conservation Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development
application. The applicant is proposing that 33.92% of the existing tree canopy be preserved.
Except for those requirements that are modified in the S -P -1 zoning regulations, the property must
meet the requirements of the Non - residential Overlay Zone.
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 5
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
It appears that this property lies within the 75 LDN D /FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
Except as otherwise approved under the propose "S -P -1" zoning this development is subject to
"Non- Residential Overlay" requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43 (IV).
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
cc:
Case No. Attachment E
ZAl2 -007 Page 6
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Nolen Office Park
• •
1.
•
Williams, Roger G Etal
SP2
Office Commercial
1.56
4
2.
S -Si Southlake Two Lp
SP2
5
2.53
NR
3
Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L
01
Retail Commercial
1.59
O
4.
Btr -8 Southlake Llc
SP2
Retail Commercial
5.76
6
1
Shanklin, Harold Est & Richard
AG
Retail Commercial
4.26
O
6.
Williams, Roger Glenn Etal
AG
Mixed Use
2
F
7.
White, Elbert Clark Jr
7
Mixed Use
15.85
NR
• •
1.
•
Williams, Roger G Etal
SP2
Office Commercial
1.56
..
F
2.
S -Si Southlake Two Lp
SP2
Office Commercial
2.53
NR
3.
Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L
01
Retail Commercial
1.59
O
4.
Btr -8 Southlake Llc
SP2
Retail Commercial
5.76
NR
5.
Shanklin, Harold Est & Richard
AG
Retail Commercial
4.26
O
6.
Williams, Roger Glenn Etal
AG
Mixed Use
3.59
F
7.
White, Elbert Clark Jr
AG
Mixed Use
15.85
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent:
Responses Received
Seven (7)
Three (3)
NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 1
Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Public Comment Form
Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session.
Name:
�� 1 /
s ^J Gt yZ l�'! 1 G� Date•' ❑
Address QtQ E !P -1/
(Include City and State)
I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item:
Agenda Item # TQ
I will speak in SUPPORT of this item
-1 will speak in OPPOSITION to this item
I do not wish to speak, but please record my
SUPPORT OPPOSITION
❑ Citizen Comments (for an item on this agenda)
s
a
Phone: 5/ �6 - 9 - 1 L )
PF.
U
Signature:
Required, Cards will not be read into the record unless
is signed.
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
Maa 13 12 04:43p Larry Cesander 5088395970 p.1
Notification Response Form
ZAl2 -007
Meeting Date: May 3, 2012 at 6:30 PM
Cesander, Laurence P Etux P L
PO Box 187
Westborough Ma, 01581
15253) 1 1 R3
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of r opposed to 1 undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Sianaature:
Additional Signature:
Date: 0l-JBf IZ
Date:
Printed Name(s): L- -WRNA Q. Ir U_. CA - zr - _
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise Contact the Planning Department_ One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 3
May 13 12 04:43p Larry Cesander 5 088395970 p.3
To: City of Southlake
Planning & Development Services
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Sotithlake, Texas 76092
From: Laurence P. Cesander
Post Office Box 187
Westborough, MA. 01591-0187
Date: May 13, 2012
Ike: Nolen Office bark Addition
Zoning Change and Site Plan
As the owner of property that will be significantly and negatively impacted by the proposed
Nolen Office Park Addition, and specifically the proposed "Village Center Drive ", I am opposed
to the approval based in part on the following facts:
*
The proposed right of way cuts across undeveloped property until it gets to my
developed property (Lot 1 -It -3, Block 1, Ueorgetown Park). At my property, instead of
utilizing undeveloped property to the South of my property or to the South of the tract in
question, it cuts into my developed lot.
c This encroachment reduces the size of my lot by dramatically reducing the
vegetation along the back side of my property. This vegetation was part of the
original planldevelopment/requirements of my property.
o The proposed "Village Center Drive" eliminates 75% of the vegetation I enjoy
along the back side of my property, and vegetation4andscaping that was integral
to the original development. In some parts, the Nolen Office Park Addition
proposal completely eliminates any Iandscape barrier and diTec connects to my
parking area.
o This proposal significantly reduces the privacy and quiet enjoyment that was part
of the original development of any property, part of what I purchased, and part of
what my tenants consider a. reason they have of in my building.
o Adding more office space should not come at the expense of underminiag the
initial development and requirements of existing office space/development.
• As presented, the proposed "Village Center Drive" would directly connect to my parking
area. My parking area would then become a NortwSouth corridor for traffic between
Southlake Boulevard and the new "Village Center Drive ".
o My parking area is not a road. It is not designed to offer any level of through
traffic. It is simply a parking area, and generally a full parking area at that.
o My parking area is not wide enough to be considered a throughway, there is
parking on both sides, and there is pedestrian traffic from the parking spaces to
my office building on what the Nolen Office Park Addition wants to make a road
through my property.
o My parking area, and the direction this proposal ftarmtels traffic, is not a straight
shot to Southlake Boulevard. My parUng area snakes belt ad any building (south
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 4
May 19 12 04:43pa Larrzj Cesander 5088395370 p.4
side), then along the East side of the building, then runs parallel along the front of
my building, and then it takes a sharp turn. towards (North/South) Southlake
Boulevard. At Southlake Boulevard there is no access. At this point it requires
another sharp right or left turn through tight parking areas to get out to Southlake
Boulevard. Any level of additional traffic through these very tight and winding
parking areas would not only be a nuisance to owners, tenants, and customers in
Georgetown Park, it would be outright dangerous.
o My parking area, as well as all of the roads in Georgetown Park are private
driveways and privately maintained, These paved areas were never built or
intended for public traffic. Additional traffic through Georgetown Park would
not only put a significant amount of new, unnecessary and dangerous traffic
through this office complex, it would create an additional and unfair cost burden
on the private owners_
As presented, the proposed "Village Center Drive' cuts across the back part of my
parking area eliminating several valuable parking spots and the locatiorn of ruy durrnpster.
I do not have the luxury of lasing parking spots. In addition the relocation of the
dumpster would have to come at the cost of a) losing more parking spots, b) moving it to
the front of the building, or c) moving it very close to the back door of the building,
None of these options are acceptable.
Being in the back of this complex, we have already experienced break -ins and burglaries.
Additional precautions have been taken including heightened security systems, new
lighting;, and the removal & relocation of trees blacking visibility to the front of the
building. One current deterrent is the visibility along the front of our building from the
Nortbl South Georgetown Dark driveway and the path that anyone committing a crime
would have to take as an escape route. Currently, anyone committing a crime on my
property would have to complete this long, visible drive: and then exit on Southlake
Boulevard_ Connecting Amy parking area in the back to a less - traveled, less - visible, less-
policed side toad will no doubt increase crime and burglaries to my building.
Please do not approve this proposal as presented. However, I would be supportive of this
proposal if it did not cut across the back of my property, reduce my protective vegetation &
landscaping buffer, connect to my parking area, or place any additional traffic through
Georgetown Panic.
Thank you for this consideration.
Sncerel
1✓auzen.e P. Ccsander
508 -839 -9205 (office)
508- 839- 5970(fax)
413 -388 -1099 (cell)
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 5
na5 13 12 04:44p L-arr-tj Cesander 5088395970 P-5
F--- 1-4
tmz��
I h
-7
HER E
4i 1 -2
-T
kll
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2-007 Page 6
Mai 13 12 04z49p LarrU Gesander 5068395970 p.6
p
i
7
7�
o�
gig
o �A
w
m v Ry
8
e
ro 7
o a
2.. u g>�
%
slate aEVaopgglnxrnr aly
,7 I
Offiee Equity Solutions
iii
o y
f�A
��
B F �'�
MOEFYi�€FIeE PAEtlf
1
a N
jjjj
cq
� � R_
a
THWIIB ElIRTPji 44RYEY,A6@rpAt7 H0. G7C
�Imllarcrnawwrcounv.rexas
a0.;
fl£IISdP OEIK
B ��. IfpflF�pi1. � �llNll� kIG.
_I
1
K
II
R
§H zi
S
1 — IL LUI' Li ` f 11
I
�` - --
1
-
1
— z
p
Ii' +LL
j
I �
iiiili
o �A
w
m v Ry
8
e
ro 7
o a
2.. u g>�
%
slate aEVaopgglnxrnr aly
,7 I
Offiee Equity Solutions
iii
o y
f�A
��
B F �'�
MOEFYi�€FIeE PAEtlf
1
a N
jjjj
cq
� � R_
a
THWIIB ElIRTPji 44RYEY,A6@rpAt7 H0. G7C
�Imllarcrnawwrcounv.rexas
a0.;
fl£IISdP OEIK
B ��. IfpflF�pi1. � �llNll� kIG.
_I
1
K
II
R
§H zi
S
1 — IL LUI' Li ` f 11
I
�` - --
1
-
1
— z
p
Ii' +LL
o �A
w
m v Ry
8
e
$
ro 7
« "
g
slate aEVaopgglnxrnr aly
99q
Offiee Equity Solutions
1
!LF
��
B F �'�
MOEFYi�€FIeE PAEtlf
•. trn��.. ray..w.
a N
jjjj
cq
� � R_
a
THWIIB ElIRTPji 44RYEY,A6@rpAt7 H0. G7C
�Imllarcrnawwrcounv.rexas
a0.;
fl£IISdP OEIK
B ��. IfpflF�pi1. � �llNll� kIG.
_I
1
K
II
R
§H zi
S
1 — IL LUI' Li ` f 11
I
�` - --
1
-
— z
p
j
_
iiiili
$
ro 7
« "
g
slate aEVaopgglnxrnr aly
99q
Offiee Equity Solutions
1
!LF
��
B F �'�
MOEFYi�€FIeE PAEtlf
•. trn��.. ray..w.
a N
jjjj
cq
� � R_
a
THWIIB ElIRTPji 44RYEY,A6@rpAt7 H0. G7C
�Imllarcrnawwrcounv.rexas
a0.;
fl£IISdP OEIK
B ��. IfpflF�pi1. � �llNll� kIG.
_I
1
K
II
R
§H zi
S
1 — IL LUI' Li ` f 11
I
[� i t
o gi
" � 3
� p yg q g ._
! O 4
yR
x 6L ;
99q
I , t
a v i
1
a
jjjj
&
I
_I
1
K
K G 5 nv-
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 7
o gi
" � 3
� p yg q g ._
! O 4
El
a a
99q
�
a
jjjj
&
I
1
K
II
R
§H zi
S
1 — IL LUI' Li ` f 11
I
�` - --
1
-
K G 5 nv-
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 7
o gi
" � 3
� p yg q g ._
! O 4
El
a a
99q
�
jjjj
`riii
p
j
_
iiiili
K G 5 nv-
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 7
May 18, 2012
Dennis Mough, AICP, Deputy Director
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
Tel 817 -748 -8072
RE: NOLEN OFFICE PARK
Medical Office Building Development
So. Nolen Drive, Southlake
Mr. "ought
As you know, we own the tract of land on So. Nolen Drive and recently sold a portion of the property to
Nolen Medical Investments; and our property abuts the West property line of the proposed Nolen Office
Park development. Please be informed ihat eve are familiar with this proposed project, and are writing to
express our support of this medical office development
We've met with Office Equity Solutions and have been provided with a complete set of their preliminary
plans and their project narrative. We understand the City's 2030 Plan proposes Village Center Drive be
extended from Nolen Drive westward, and we believe the proposed alignment is reasonable.
We also understand that the proposed roadway aligntent requires a small right -of -way dedication from our
property; and we are prepared to provide it
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you,
6
0
Roger Williams LI'
Tel: 061 q gq
CC: Office Equity Solutions
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 8
July ?, 2012
Dennis Killough, AICP, Deputy Director
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
Tel 917-748-8072
RE: NOLEN OFFICE PARK
Medical Office Building Development
So. Nolen Drive, Southlake
Mr. Killough:
As you know, we own the tract of land, on the east side of South Nolen Drive, directly across the street from
the referenced project. Out property, known as Lot 1 R Cornerstone Business Park, was recently re -zoned
(ZA11 -027) with a concept plan.
We are writing to again document our support of the proposed Nolen Office Park project, and to
acknowledge that their proposed drive approach cannot lineup exactly with the drive approach shown on our
concept plan.
We understand that when our project proceeds to the site planning stage, we may need to shift our drive
approach to line -up with theirs. We have no objections to accommodating a small shift of our approach, and
support their development as submitted.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you,
Roger Williams
Tel 817 - 489 -3141
CC: Office Equity Solutions
e:12011.000,00012011 714.000ocsWte plan application packag6williarns Ietter to somlake.docx
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl2 -007 Page 9
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480 -619
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT
11A, THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474,
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 1.996 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG"
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "S -P -1" DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT
"B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural
District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 1
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 2
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tract 11A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 1.996 acres, and more fully and
completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "S -P -1" Detailed
Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit "B ", and subject to the following conditions:
1.
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 3
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 4
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 5
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 St reading the 21 day of August, 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2 nd reading the day of , 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Tract 11A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, being approximately 1.996 acres, and more fully and completely described
below:
Reserved for Corrected Metes and Bounds Description
Case No.
ZAl2 -007
Attachment G
Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for Approved Development
Case No. Attachment G
ZAl2 -007 Page 9