Loading...
Item 6CCITY 01 SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT June 13, 2012 CASE NO: ZAl2 -049 PROJECT: Site Plan for Lakeside Presbyterian Church Parking Expansion EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: REQUEST DETAILS: ACTION NEEDED ATTACHMENTS: Lakeside Presbyterian Church is requesting approval of a site plan to add twenty -eight (28) parking spaces on property described as Lot 13R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2701 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: CS - Community Service District. SPIN Neighborhood # 11. Lakeside Presbyterian Church is requesting approval of a site plan to add twenty -eight (28) parking spaces along the existing driveway in front of the church. At the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on June 7, 2012, the applicant has added a parking lot island at the end of the existing parking on the west driveway and as a result, reduced the number of added parking spaces shown on the plan from thirty (30) spaces to twenty -eight (28) spaces for a total of ninety -seven (97) spaces. The applicant has also provided a list of proposed plant materials for the parking lot islands. A table showing the required and provided parking lot landscaping for the previous and revised plans is below. 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Site Plan (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) SPIN Meeting Report dated June 11, 2012 (D) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 12, 2012 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (G) Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Case No. ZAl2 -049 Required Provided # of Spaces Added Landscape Island Landscape Island Area (sq.ft.) Area (sq.ft.) Previous Plan 30 600 1,008 Revised Plan 28 560 1,224 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Site Plan (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) SPIN Meeting Report dated June 11, 2012 (D) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 12, 2012 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (G) Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Case No. ZAl2 -049 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748 -8072 Richard Schell (817)748 -8602 Case No. ZAl2 -049 BACKGROUND INFORMATION I 1:1:Z9]:J21 :4wi /_1QQN * *I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION we1kI31W CURRENT ZONING: Lakeside Presbyterian Church 0WLlSRAWTA& W [ii1F1:7a:1h 4t Lot 13R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition r171C•7L•Y�iile rl 71C•7 "CS" Community Service District HISTORY: -A zoning change and concept plan (ZA94 -118) from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District was approved by City Council on December 6, 1994. -A site plan (ZA05 -035) for Lakeside Presbyterian Church was approved by City Council on June 7, 2005. -A plat showing (ZA05 -089) for Lot 13, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition was filed December 9, 2005. -An amended plat (ZA08 -090) for Lot 13R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition was filed on September 19, 2008. PATHWAYS PLAN: The 2025 Pathways Plan shows an 8' multi -use trail crossing the southern portion of the property. A 5' sidewalk is required along all public streets for all developments requiring a City Council approved site plan. The City Engineer has determined that the scope of the development is not roughly proportional to the requirements for the construction of the multi -use trail and sidewalk. TREE PRESERVATION: The 11" Blackjack Oak in the parking landscape median on the northwest side of the property is a tree that was designated to be preserved during the previous Site Plan approval. If the tree dies from the construction of the proposed parking addition, it will be required to be mitigated in accordance with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -D. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held June 11, 2012 at 8:00 p.m. The report from that meeting is PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: June 7, 2012; Approved (4 -1) subject to the applicant's willingness to put a landscaped island at the beginning of the new parking spaces on the west side of the property and subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 1, 2012. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 1, 2012. Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -049 Page 1 Vicinity Map Lakeside Presbyterian Church JL W. Southlake Blvd. a� L a..r ZAl2 -049 Site Plan 2701 W. Southlake Blvd. 0 240 480 960 S iFeet Case No. Attachment B ZAl2 -049 Page 1 S SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ;A[t *a1=101dki Vtldrl=$ SPIN DISTRICT: Ml=1=11111, 17_ 114 MEETING LOCATION: ZA 12 -049 Lakeside Presbyterian Church SPIN # 11 June 11, 2012; 8 :00 PM 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A — 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Seven (7) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Monique Schill, #11; Vic Awtry, # 7 • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: David Musil, Church Representative • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Richard Schell, Planner 11, (817)748 -8602; rschelKc ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located at 2701 West Southlake Boulevard. Development Details • Lakeside Presbyterian Church is requesting approval of a site plan to add thirty (30) parking spaces along the existing driveway in front of the church. • The applicant stated that in 2008, the church had an estimated 105 members and 70 parking spaces; over the last four years„ membership has grown to about 175. Additional parking is needed to accommodate the growth. The applicant presented the following plan: Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -049 Page 1 Enlarged: "Vs %roaw,m 0 s inu eoJ"�nmxnaLLnc L LL p • r1wnPl8liY lfl�AlU. ­MK." ., va �rwv MONUML SIGN •rrw rmn � '., •a rr�x wart rsrm K YIrY�i wa•1M b � - -- _ -.. . . - - ,t_= - - -- .... . .... : Yraerrr - - - - -- wr1r Y W. rf(;r M 0 2 2005 COMMENTS /CONCERNS • When is the second sanctuary going to be built? o We will start making the plans next year.. probably built in about three years. • Are you planning any sidewalk connections to Watermere? o No What happened at the P &Z meeting? o We were asked to submit a plan showing required landscaping. The "NO" vote we received was because we did not have a SPIN meeting prior to the P&Z meeting. ■ A very lengthy discussion took place regarding the activity between the church and the contractor who was awarded the bid for the project. City permits were not obtained properly. The necessity of a site plan approval came after -the -fact. Large amounts of cement and dirt had already been removed from the site. Consequently, the entrance to the church looks pretty tore up and unfinished. What about a stub out at Watermere with future development so there could be a connection? o We can look at the possibility of that.. it would be nice to have Watermere residents join our service. We have a few that are already attending. • What about the contractor who didn't follow the permitting process? Are they helping you resolve this problem? o They have stated that as soon as we gain approval, they will work diligently to get the job done and place high priority on our site. They estimate completion in 4 -5 days. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made_ Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant- Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -049 Page 1 r �ll ­MK." ., va �rwv MONUML SIGN •rrw rmn � '., •a rr�x wart rsrm K YIrY�i wa•1M b � - -- _ -.. . . - - ,t_= - - -- .... . .... : Yraerrr - - - - -- wr1r Y W. rf(;r M 0 2 2005 COMMENTS /CONCERNS • When is the second sanctuary going to be built? o We will start making the plans next year.. probably built in about three years. • Are you planning any sidewalk connections to Watermere? o No What happened at the P &Z meeting? o We were asked to submit a plan showing required landscaping. The "NO" vote we received was because we did not have a SPIN meeting prior to the P&Z meeting. ■ A very lengthy discussion took place regarding the activity between the church and the contractor who was awarded the bid for the project. City permits were not obtained properly. The necessity of a site plan approval came after -the -fact. Large amounts of cement and dirt had already been removed from the site. Consequently, the entrance to the church looks pretty tore up and unfinished. What about a stub out at Watermere with future development so there could be a connection? o We can look at the possibility of that.. it would be nice to have Watermere residents join our service. We have a few that are already attending. • What about the contractor who didn't follow the permitting process? Are they helping you resolve this problem? o They have stated that as soon as we gain approval, they will work diligently to get the job done and place high priority on our site. They estimate completion in 4 -5 days. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made_ Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant- Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -049 Page 1 PREVIOUS SITE PLAN PRESENTED AT P &Z JUNE 7, 2012 � � N17 AC&'NTZ� N ���Q@S� 19YRPSID 9 O� fr 6 r� � N b � Z � o n ''.' � L n.�n51�,.�s •II•I i. Ali. ,I � I 5 •.� I I I •. � I I'_'JS. I. ��© gg �� aj 9��5 Lj 9 •_ ze , 21 CINfCAEfE FlAC I. � . ;'.'i. g F�: •.I�. _ •r.•.l o I .•{.'. i ts ABfALIltJTZONRtlG5P1. m. ra �R:�E. re aim ' Z L ❑.Q= PU➢llC /SB�¢N@LIC ero rc svumuxae , swrnrtnn� n mona Y � gg g� Q ^ 9 C "i M�, €A D { �n �G ZA05 - 035 Case No. ZAl2 -049 Attachment D Page 1 a €a � �.. ��� ° 9 O� fr 6 r� � N b � Z � o n ''.' � L n.�n51�,.�s •II•I i. Ali. ,I � I 5 •.� I I I •. � I I'_'JS. I. ��© gg �� aj 9��5 Lj 9 •_ ze , 21 CINfCAEfE FlAC I. � . ;'.'i. g F�: •.I�. _ •r.•.l o I .•{.'. i ts ABfALIltJTZONRtlG5P1. m. ra �R:�E. re aim ' Z L ❑.Q= PU➢llC /SB�¢N@LIC ero rc svumuxae , swrnrtnn� n mona Y � gg g� Q ^ 9 C "i M�, €A D { �n �G ZA05 - 035 Case No. ZAl2 -049 Attachment D Page 1 M fi \ O r d� M :7 (n N � � x � .i . 4, . b, AD�dG@�TlBIV@7Cc &PZ� r `v i`RpL2NY tl1W£iC a •' ` Z �^ Lf1.0. =PIffi1C1�P aar xr saaeuua aua mua m,.mnz =E 2 4 9 � 9 '1 Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -049 Page 2 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTED JUNE 11, 2012 m I c Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -049 Page 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZAl2 -049 Review No.: Two Project Name: Site Plan — Lakeside Presbyterian Church Date of Review: 06/12/12 Fill aaI191 Ll11aIFi�1f Iky, R M Lakeside Presbyterian Church 2701 W. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 528 -5075 E -mail: dpmusil @prodigy.net 191TA►1 :A1=t gIJiITM Lakeside Presbyterian Church 2701 W. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 528 -5075 E -mail: dpmusil @prodigy.net CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/12/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8072. Correct the site plan to show the dimensions of the added parking island on the west driveway to be twelve (12) feet by eighteen (18) feet. Tree Conservation /Landscape Review E -mail: kmartin @ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748 -8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The 11" Blackjack Oak in the parking landscape median on the northwest side of the property is a tree that was designated to be preserved during the previous Site Plan approval. If the tree dies from the construction of the proposed parking addition, it will be required to be mitigated in accordance with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -D. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: The applicant is providing the required parking lot landscape area at each end of the proposed parking spaces and within the line of parking spaces. In order to reduce the effects of construction on the 11" Blackjack Oak it is recommended that only mulch be placed within the landscape median with the tree. The other required parking lot landscape areas will be required to have the required canopy or accent trees along with the required shrubs, ground cover, or ornamental grasses. Planting Requirements: Each individual parking lot landscape island shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, or seasonal color. Parking lot landscape islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory /accent trees for the required canopy tree. All required landscape areas shall be evenly distributed throughout the entire required parking lot landscape areas. Informational Comments: Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -049 Page 1 A SPIN meeting was held on June 11, 2012 at 8:00 p.m. One additional accessible parking space will be required since the total number of parking spaces will be between 76 and 100 spaces. The 2025 Pathways Plan shows an 8' multi -use trail crossing the southern portion of the property. A 5' sidewalk is required along all public streets for all developments requiring a City Council approved site plan. The City Engineer has determined that the scope of the development is not roughly proportional to the requirements for the construction of the multi -use trail and sidewalk. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off -site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZAl2 -049 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Lakeside Presbyterian Church 4 1 3 10 11 -86 -• # 1 Owner Lakeside Presbyteran Church Zoning CS Land Use Medium Density Residential Acreage 7.43 Respo NR 2 Hall, Jerry G SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.24 F 3 Hall, Jerry SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.54 F 4 Hall, Jerry SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.82 F 5 Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.78 NR 6 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 2.95 NR 7 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 1.63 NR 8 Southlake Care Group Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 3.15 NR 9 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 14.90 NR 10 Wiesman, E I AG Medium Density Residential 13.19 NR 11 Pendley, J Evelyn SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 12 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 13 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 14 Ger /Dar Llc SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 15 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 16 Schmidt, R M SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 17 Parr, Jay C & Margene SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 18 Schultz, Blanche SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 19 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 20 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 21 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 22 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 23 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 24 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 25 Irby, Earline D SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 26 Katen, Luella M Trust SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 1 27 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 28 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 29 Brown Living Trust SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 30 Goad, Doris J SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 31 Miller, Jimmie P Etux Rosamond SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 32 Larson, Alice M SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 33 Frame, Lucile SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 34 Hottenstein, Mary Jo SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 35 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 36 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 37 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 38 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 39 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 40 Robertson, Lula Marie SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 41 Mullelly, Virginia M SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 42 Flynn, Joan E Tr SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 43 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 44 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 45 Miller, Fred J Jr Etux Betty SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 46 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 47 Johnson, Gladys M SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 48 Hubbs, Patricia Lee SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 49 Elm, Mary Jo SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 50 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 51 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 52 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 53 Smith, Royal D SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 54 Fera, Anthony S Etal SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 55 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 56 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 57 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 58 Thomas, William G SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 59 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 60 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 61 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 62 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 63 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 64 Cary, Lois SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 65 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 66 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 67 Ferney, Stephen J & Sandra F SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 68 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 69 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 70 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 71 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 72 Smith, Eleanor SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 73 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 74 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 75 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 76 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 77 Edwards, John III & Barbara SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 78 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 79 Jeffery, Keith A & Stella Tr SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 F 80 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 81 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 2 82 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 83 Southlake Watermark Holdings L SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 84 Keene, Leona C SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 85 Southlake Watermark Holding Lp SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR 86 Morris, Peggy Lee SP2 Medium Density Residential 6.37 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Notices Sent: Responses Received: Eighty -six (86) Three (3) — Attached NR: No Response Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 3 Notification Response Form ZAl2 -049 Meeting Date: June 7, 2012 at 6:30 PM Hall, Jerry PO Box 982005 Fort Worth Tx, 76182 21590 17A PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby (� in favor of (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. opposed to undecided about Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Phone Number (optional): Date=S - -, Date: at to. Otherwise con=!Ihe Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 4 Notification Response Form ZAl2 -049 Meeting Date: June 7, 2012 at 6:30 PM Hall, Jerry G PO Box 982005 Fort Worth Tx, 76182 21590 1A PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): ' °e r Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Phone Number (optional): Date: �, l Z Date: at top. Otherwise cont�he Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 5 Notification Response Form ZAl2 -049 Meeting Date: June 7, 2012 at 6:30 PM Jeffery, Keith A & Stella Tr 301 Watermere Dr Apt 417 Southlake Tx, 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. opposed to undecided about Space for comments regarding your position: Signature Additional Date: 4�� Dater f� Printed Name(s): � -2� A. s���.� [Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Oth ise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -049 Page 6