The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6ACITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT June 13, 2012 CASE NO: ZAl2 -045 PROJECT: Bonefish Grill Restaurant EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a new 5,620 square foot restaurant building on the southeast corner of Carroll Avenue and E. Southlake Boulevard on approximately 8.7 acres located at 1201 E. Southlake Boulevard within The Shops of Southlake retail center. SPIN #8. DETAILS: OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a new 5,620 square foot restaurant building on the southeast corner of Carroll Avenue and E. Southlake Boulevard. The restaurant location is proposed to be located on a previously approved 8,700 square foot restaurant pad site which featured a patio dining area and porte - cochere vehicle valet area under Planning Case ZA08 -079. The proposed restaurant does not have a porte - cochere drop off and has an approximately 3,000 square foot smaller footprint. ACTION NEEDED: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT At the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting held on June 7, 2012, the Commission recommended approval of the site plan subject to the trash enclosure area being fully enclosed within the building and denying the requested variance to the Overlay Zones Section 43.9(c.2.d) requiring an 8 -foot masonry screen that matches the principle building materials for trash or recycling receptacles. The applicant has now addressed the Planning & Zoning Commissions condition of approval by revising the site plan and attaching this trash storage area to the main building and adding a roof, making it an integral part of the building and no longer needing a variance with their request. 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval Request (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 12, 2012 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Dennis Killough (817) 748 -8072 Daniel Cortez (817) 748 -8070 Case No. ZAl2 -045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Carroll /1709, Ltd APPLICANT: OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: 1201 E. Southlake Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, The Shops of Southlake LAND USE CATEGORY: Town Center CURRENT ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan Zoning District HISTORY: - A rezoning and concept plan for "S -P -2" zoning was approved in May of 1996. - A revised concept plan was proposed in 1999 and deemed to be inconsistent with the "S -P -2" zoning by the Southlake Zoning Board of Adjustments. - City Council approved a change of zoning and concept plan to "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District on May 17, 2005. - A preliminary plat was also approved by City Council on May 17, 2005. - A Final Plat was approved in September 2005. - A site plan was approved in October 2005 for the majority of the site - Building A3 was approved in February 2006. - On October 7, 2008 The City Council approved a restaurant pad site for this location under Planning Case ZA08 -079. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on June 11, 2012 at Southlake Town Hall for the proposed restaurant. A copy of the SPIN report can be found under Attachment `C' of this staff report. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: June 7, 2012; Approved (6 -0) subject to the trash area being fully enclosed within the building, denying the requested variance and subject to the revised Site Plan Summary #2 dated June 7, 2012. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 12, 2012. WCommunity DevelopmenhMEMO12012 Cases1045 - SP - Bonefish GrilAStaff Report Case No. Attachment A ZAl2 -045 Page 1 Vicinity Map Bonefish Grill Restaurant MAIN ST w a U) E SOUTHLAKE BLVD (FM 1709) Restaurant Location w Q J J DR Q U ZAl2 -045 Site Plan 1201 E. Southlake Blvd. N F 0 3 50 700 1,400 �� Feet Case No. Attachment B ZAl2 -045 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Approved Site Plan and Elevations 0 0 EAST- 0 Aq ------ — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — -- -- scH it .. .. . ...... ATIO F AMM E AESTJ RETAIL 11 RESTJ t RETAIL RETAIL t I STM tb 1 FTM 7 CO SOD( 3WR TR TYP 1 2 8' aplex Case No. Attachment C ZA1 2-045 Page 1 01 NORTH ELEVATION MASrWZY M- 03 SOUTH ELEVATION Ma EIS C40MCE r wirK AIXTW MIL [.[NINh / - 1 (J NAJltI EFI /.1' v Tr cac cE BEYOND — "I, MAMMM STORBRONt J 9NLK WAINSOOr I— HA50wh MM - - DltIOK A Da 4 fRAI'E BEYOND 04 EAST ELEVATION .w-.- -- Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 2 02 WEST ELEVATION �Ow Proaosed Site Plan law fASR HYPE bit J ;� �_ ..own � -•� m�o,rt — � — — + I..� T — � � —r• SBB]2�IB'E� • eow— sss J L— - - -- S EPSnNG SA `QNEEISN Y B A L DING ONE STORE STOR EQILL € PROPO6FD COYFRR) 2� PROPOSED EN0.O5fD STgM4£ 5 ONE STORY BUILDING §Ei I I 5,620 SQUARE FEET 91.25' Ia6T tl ` b_' 2V so 9_„45'1!• _ + ® ® °° r_�a�' �. ti]5• , . o-xixs CFR9vu'N•E mcvrt nwvrt LOT 1 BLOCK 1 •r•°•0�en.w.vn ° THE SRWPS OF SWTHLAK CAB. A. PG. 12 59. PRTCT ZON SP? - - Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 3 k z W , L 4. )EXISTING J ; �r::.:.�11• �, �ll� ww ..��••��IIII REST �. I RETAIL STORY A !! -- �� - ru . A\ 1 Q1� R •�' • � rinn � E � law fASR HYPE bit J ;� �_ ..own � -•� m�o,rt — � — — + I..� T — � � —r• SBB]2�IB'E� • eow— sss J L— - - -- S EPSnNG SA `QNEEISN Y B A L DING ONE STORE STOR EQILL € PROPO6FD COYFRR) 2� PROPOSED EN0.O5fD STgM4£ 5 ONE STORY BUILDING §Ei I I 5,620 SQUARE FEET 91.25' Ia6T tl ` b_' 2V so 9_„45'1!• _ + ® ® °° r_�a�' �. ti]5• , . o-xixs CFR9vu'N•E mcvrt nwvrt LOT 1 BLOCK 1 •r•°•0�en.w.vn ° THE SRWPS OF SWTHLAK CAB. A. PG. 12 59. PRTCT ZON SP? - - Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 3 O Z W z W Q J J CC cc Q v 2 F— C0 D= 1125'16" R =252.50' L= 50.33' D= 1125'16" R-252.50' L= 50.33' EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD F. M. HIGHWAY NO. 1709 D= 13'41'08" R= 211.33 L= 50.48' • • 0 • 39 '48" - - 91.00 — cp f`J I I ! I 0 i 1 .0 LEGEND 0 LIVE OAK TREE 0 CREPE MYRTLE TREE Case No. ZAl2 -045 Attachment C Page 4 C* TAM JUNIPERS <g, MAIDEN GRASS SEASONAL COLOR O BERMUDA GRASS ZAl2 -045 Case No. ZAl2 -045 Attachment C Page 4 |� � � $ $(!� � �� [ || [ � � & &��l� � ■� d m� 4 | � � | | � I�t , ( , �� ) � || � | � § � $ |&. ! , § |� | |� . |b■ §§ § H M § §§ 11 g § |§ §/S ( ■b ! § h�d ■§ b[ §$ §| ± |§ § § Case No. Attachment C ZAl2- 45 Page 5 Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 6 ] 9 q g i t Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 6 Revised Elevations for Enclosed Trash Storage Area ' .' � III �•lil■C►�� ■�� h. o n � /^I !.. ■..■ � Ili 1� � ;�,� ,� H In MIN: IIIN �W,05 d 4 INIll fa MENEMEM Milli M i 111H IN- R ISTP! .. . ... ..... 5 11 HR IE IR - Ma ,, �� ll =,,.,.,., w ■ ■i ICI Ali ==. — = I � :�I �� ilia _ _ ��,�I��I =00 PAM - Lo Case No. Attachment C ZA1 2-045 Page 7 USOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZAl2 -045 PROJECT NAME: Bonefish Grill Restaurant SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 8 MEETING DATE: June 11. 2012. 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A — 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Four (4) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT: Ray Tremain # 9 • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Jim Dewey, Project Engineer David Palmer, Cencor Realty • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher. Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I, (817)748 -8070: dcortez(a,)ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located at the southeast corner of Southlake Boulevard and South Carroll Avenue. in the Shops of Southlake shopping center. Development Details • The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a new 5,620 square foot restaurant building on the southeast corner of Carroll Avenue and E. Southlake Boulevard. The restaurant is proposed to be located on the previously approved restaurant pad site which featured an 8,700 square foot restaurant with patio dining area and porte - cochere drop off for vehicles under Planning Case ZA08 -079. The proposed restaurant does not have a porte - cochere drop off and has an approximately 3.000 square foot smaller footprint. It does, however, feature an outdoor dining area on the north side as well as a covered seating patio area on the south side. The applicant presented the following plans: Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 8 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD F. W. lfBNWAY NO. T/OY - Y I LII a I Trig] — G i COMMENTS /CONCERNS No one other than the SPIN representative and the applicants were present. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 9 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD F. AL HOMAY NO. 170E ' ,®r.1 a LML— u L 11 4 N D COMMENTS /CONCERNS No one other than the SPIN representative and the applicants were present. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 9 ,®r.1 a LML— COMMENTS /CONCERNS No one other than the SPIN representative and the applicants were present. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZAl2 -045 Page 9 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZAl2 -045 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 06/12/2012 Project Name: Bonefish Grill Restaurant APPLICANT: JDJR Engineers & Consultants OWNER: Carroll /1709, LTD Jim Dewey 2500 Texas Dr., Ste. 100 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (972) 252 -5357 Fax: David Palmer 3202 Maple Ave., Ste. 200 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/21/2012 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DANIEL CORTEZ AT (817) 748 -8070. Correct the land use designations on the adjacent properties shown on the site plan. Public Works /Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748 -8101 E -mail: sanderson(o)-ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or in the ROW. All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" x 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. http:// www. cityofsouthlake.com /PublicWorks /engineeringdesign.asp Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated, Ordinance No. 836. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. Informational Comments No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. If signage with a variance request is intended to be submitted, staff recommends this be submitted with plans showing sign dimensions so processing can occur concurrently with the site plan request. Contact Lorrie Fletcher with specific questions regarding sign variance processing at (817) 748 -8069. Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -045 Page 1 All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. Denotes Informational Comment Guidelines for Shops at Southlake Building Massing & Scale: A building's massing is its exterior volume and its scale is the relationship of its overall size and its component parts with its adjoining buildings, spaces, and people. • A building's massing shall relate to its site, use, and to the massing of adjacent buildings. • A building's massing shall serve to define entry points and help orient pedestrians. • The scale of individual building facade components shall relate to one another and the human scale, particularly at the street level. • Buildings and /or facades shall emphasize and frame or terminate important vistas. Building Rhythm: A building's rhythm is (are) the pattern(s) created by the regular recurrence or alteration of its constituent architectural components. Variations in the rhythms within individual building facades shall be achieved within any block of building facades. Breaks in the predominant rhythm may also be used to reinforce changes in massing and important elements such as building entrances or pedestrian pass- through. Architectural Elements: Architectural elements are the individual components of a building, including walls, doors, windows, cornices, parapets, roofs, pediments, and other features. Architectural composition is the relationship between the architectural elements in an individual building. • Architectural elements shall be designed to the appropriate scale and proportions of the selected architectural style. For example, building designs based on an Art Deco style shall utilize architectural elements of a scale and proportion characteristic of that style. Building Entrances: The design and location of building entrances are important to help define the pedestrian environment and create retail - friendly environments. • Entrances shall be easily identifiable as primary points of access to buildings. • Building entrances may be defined and articulated by architectural elements such as lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns, porticos, porches, overhangs, railings, balustrades, and others as appropriate. All building elements should be compatible with the architectural style, materials, colors, and details of the building as a whole. • Entrances to upper level uses may be defined and integrated into the design of the overall building facade. Facade Treatments: Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -045 Page 2 • All sides of a building shall be consistent with respect to style, colors, and details only to the extent that they establish continuity with the main street -front facade. • Display windows are encouraged along the main facades of buildings. Buildings should avoid long, monotonous, uninterrupted walls. Building wall offsets, including projections, recesses, niches, fenestration, or changes of materials or color shall be used to add architectural variety and interest, and to relieve the visual impact of a blank wall. • Parapet and roof -line offsets between facades may be provided in order to break down the scale of the block and create architectural interest and variety. • Architectural elements, such as canopies, awnings, roof and floor overhangs, and colonnades shall be provided as appropriate to protect pedestrians, help unify parts of a building or block, provide human scale, or provide a backdrop for signage and graphics. Building Materials: Exterior finish building materials shall consist of: • Masonry, which is defined as brick, cast stone, glass fiber reinforced concrete, glass fiber reinforced gypsum, and split face concrete masonry units • Stucco, including synthetic stucco (exterior insulation finishing system - EFIS) • Glazed ceramic and porcelain tile • Fiber reinforced plastic (with the exception of plastic or vinyl siding) - used for exterior building components, including but not limited to: cornice and entablature elements, decorative columns and pilasters, storefront trim, railings, and balustrades, spandrel panels, and similar elements. • Painted steel and aluminum, cast iron, bronze, brass, copper (including terne coated) • Roofing materials (visible from any public right -of -way): copper, factory finished painted metal, slate, synthetic slate, terra cotta, cement tile, glass fiber shingles. • Materials other than those listed above may be used for architectural trim and accent applications including, but not limited to, cornices and decorative brackets, frieze panels, decorative lintels, shutters, and porch or balcony railings. Lighting: The placement and orientation of lighting can be a critical part of creating an inviting and safe downtown environment. • Exterior lighting shall be architecturally integrated with the building's style, material, and color. • Lighting intensities shall be controlled to ensure that excessive light spillage and glare are not directed toward neighboring areas and motorists. • Pedestrian level lighting of building entrance -ways shall be provided. • Illuminations of portions of buildings, direct or indirect, may be used for safety or aesthetic results. Pedestrian Network: Sidewalks are a critical part of pedestrian connectivity. In order to enhance the safety of the pedestrian environment, all development shall be subject to the following: • The street network, with its adjoining sidewalks, shall function as the primary pedestrian network. • Mid -block pedestrian connections from the street to parking lots at the rear of the building(s) may be provided at key points. • Pedestrian crosswalks shall be clearly designated and provided at all key street intersections. • Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6' -0" measured from the face of the curb to the building facade. That portion of the sidewalk that is free of any obstructions to allow for the passage of pedestrians shall be a minimum of 4' -0 ". Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -045 Page 3 Streetscape Treatment: The following guidelines for streetscape standards are provided in order to create an attractive and animated sidewalk environment. The developer shall propose a well - designed and unified streetscape plan for key streets in the Downtown district. • Street trees shall be planted in accordance with a unified landscaping plan proposed by the developer and approved by City Council. • Street Furnishings shall be installed in accordance with a streetscape plan proposed by the developer and approved by City Council. Street furnishings may include planting strips, raised planters, trash receptacles, street light standards, street signs, wayfinding signs, media boxes, seating, public art, water features, fire hydrants, etc. Case No. Attachment D ZAl2 -045 Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Bonefish Grill Restaurant F� 16 1 F 17 0 12 g 13 �1 11 18 10 14 2 3 4 5 8 7 6 SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response 1. Greenway - Southlake Office Prtn SP1 Office Commercial 1.99 NR 2. Ali, Zulfiqar Etux Samreen Ali SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.57 NR 3. Poonawala, Shiraz Etux Yasmeen SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.51 NR 4. Cravens, Jane H SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.54 NR 5. Carkner, Philip Etux Ginny SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.70 NR 6. Bellany, Rodney Etux Tammy SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.50 NR 7. Griffith, Mark E SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.79 NR 8. Drake, Thomas E Etux Donna A SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.63 NR 9. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 8.67 NR 10. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 0.93 NR 11. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 7.38 NR 12. Southlake, City Of SP2 Town Center 0.78 NR 13. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 8.93 NR 14. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 2.43 NR 15. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.38 NR 16. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 4.33 NR 17. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 0.94 NR 18. Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est AG Office Commercial, Medium Density Residential 15.42 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Notices Sent: Eleven (11) Responses Received: None Case No. ZAl2 -045 NR: No Response Attachment E Page 1 Property Owner Responses NONE Case No. Attachment F ZAl2 -045 Page 1