Item 6C (2)CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
MEMORANDUM
February 29, 2012
To: City Council
From: Ken Baker, AICP — Director of Planning & Development Services
Subject: Ordinance No. 1021: Southlake 2030 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan
Action
Requested: Conduct Public Hearing and consider 2n Reading of the proposed Ordinance
No. 1021: Southlake 2030 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan.
Background
Information: The City of Southlake approaches land use planning through sector planning, a
method which divides the City into sectors to identify development issues and
to develop recommendations for each individual area. This approach
recognizes that planning issues are numerous and complex, and may vary from
area to area or even site to site. In short, the purpose of a sector plan is to:
• Establish a detailed background for the planning area,
• Identify current development constraints and issues,
• Identify features, resources and areas to be protected or improved,
• Explore development opportunities and
• List recommendations for the future development and conservation of
the area.
This sector plan would be the final sector plan and the sixth sector plan for
formal consideration during the Southlake 2030 Plan process pertaining to land
use.
Financial
Considerations: None.
Strategic Link: The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan relates to all focus areas of the strategy map.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: All meetings of the Southlake 2030 Land Use Plan Committee are open to the
public. The committee met on July 27, 2011, September 1, 2011, October 19,
2011 and January 26, 2012 to discuss the S.H. 114 Corridor.
In addition, a SPIN meeting was held on December 5, 2011 (see the SPIN
report in Attachment A).
A public hearing was held at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on
February 9, 2012.
A public hearing will also be scheduled at a City Council meeting on March 6,
2012.
Planning & Zoning
Commission: February 9, 2012; Approved (6 -0) as presented by staff.
City Council: February 21, 2012; Approved (7 -0) 1s' Reading on consent.
Legal Review: None.
Alternatives: Recommend modifications to the proposed S.H. 114 Corridor Plan or move
forward with the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan as presented.
Attachments: (A) SPIN Meeting Report
(B) Ordinance No. 1021
(C) Southlake 2030 Draft S.H. 114 Corridor Plan
Attachment A:
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
PROJECT NAME: State Highway 114 Corridor Plan
SPIN DISTRICTS: City -wide
MEETING DATE: December 5, 2011
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Eight (8)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry (SPIN #7)
• STAFF PRESENTING: Ken Baker, Director of Planning and Development Services
• STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I; Lorrie Fletcher, Planner 1
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cortez — 817 - 748 -8070 or dcortezaci. south lake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The State Highway 114 Corridor Plan is the final of six sector plans adopted during the Southlake
2030 process. The most prominent land uses include commercial activities, office and public /semi
public uses. The primary objectives for planning in the S.H. 114 corridor are improving specific traffic
intersections, adjusting underlying land use designations as appropriate, maintaining high
development and urban design standards, and ensuring continued quality growth. The Plan further
addresses the unique characteristics and challenges of this major roadway corridor and provides
specific planning recommendations in regard to land use, mobility, and economic development.
Future Land Use Recommendations:
Specific Mobility Recommendations:
• Consider realigning the intersection of Sams School Road and W. Dove Road to line up with
N. Peytonville Ave.
• Consider a dual roundabout at the intersection of W. Highland Street and N. White Chapel
Blvd.
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
• Are the roundabouts proving effective?
o Yes, they improve efficiency of traffic and are safer. Also, as unique features, roundabouts
provide for urban design elements (SL 2025) for art and as landmarks.
• When will sidewalks be addressed specifically?
o The Sidewalk Plan will be formally addressed in FY2013, however, annual priority lists for
construction have been successful. The FY2012 priority list will be presented to SPIN early
next year.
• The change on Kimball Road (600 block) that used to be rural. Now there is increased traffic with
the church and school. On the East side of Kimball, residential sales have declined since 2007
with 8 or 9 foreclosures. Kimball traffic is causing the residential market to fall. The city should
study how to handle the east side of Kimball Rd. (Estancia, Patterson's Pond, etc.).
In regards to ED1 — setting up shovel ready sites: I feel that current process works well (SPIN,
P &Z, City Council). It seems that homeowners would lose direct input. Do we really need to
compete with other cities?
• Carroll Avenue and traffic congestion — what happened to the plan for a Texas turnaround?
o We are currently pursuing a STEP grant; we will continue to explore options with the Mobility
Plan.
• We need to keep traffic on 114 and off of Carroll. The 7 -11 corner is a mess. Mobility needs
continued focus. We should have sidewalks leading to Town Square.
• What about the hospital? Is it considered high intensity or low intensity?
o The hospital is a part of the mixed use; transition to residential was considered with a high
quality development plan that placed intensity along S.H. 114 and a highly buffered area along
Highland.
a
y.L .
�
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS
• Are the roundabouts proving effective?
o Yes, they improve efficiency of traffic and are safer. Also, as unique features, roundabouts
provide for urban design elements (SL 2025) for art and as landmarks.
• When will sidewalks be addressed specifically?
o The Sidewalk Plan will be formally addressed in FY2013, however, annual priority lists for
construction have been successful. The FY2012 priority list will be presented to SPIN early
next year.
• The change on Kimball Road (600 block) that used to be rural. Now there is increased traffic with
the church and school. On the East side of Kimball, residential sales have declined since 2007
with 8 or 9 foreclosures. Kimball traffic is causing the residential market to fall. The city should
study how to handle the east side of Kimball Rd. (Estancia, Patterson's Pond, etc.).
In regards to ED1 — setting up shovel ready sites: I feel that current process works well (SPIN,
P &Z, City Council). It seems that homeowners would lose direct input. Do we really need to
compete with other cities?
• Carroll Avenue and traffic congestion — what happened to the plan for a Texas turnaround?
o We are currently pursuing a STEP grant; we will continue to explore options with the Mobility
Plan.
• We need to keep traffic on 114 and off of Carroll. The 7 -11 corner is a mess. Mobility needs
continued focus. We should have sidewalks leading to Town Square.
• What about the hospital? Is it considered high intensity or low intensity?
o The hospital is a part of the mixed use; transition to residential was considered with a high
quality development plan that placed intensity along S.H. 114 and a highly buffered area along
Highland.
• So the Mixed Use adjacent to residential will be considered on a case by case basis?
o Yes, low intensity would be a good recommendation.
• 1 am concerned with "shovel ready "; creating these areas is going to minimize how much
thoughtfulness goes into who comes here.
• The majority of the team should be required to be Southlake residents.
o That is the intention, however, some people who own major property in Southlake would also
be appropriate.
• 1 am concerned about water; the restrictions have become more prevalent. Does the city have a
water plan that can keep up with this development plan?
• We are going to finalize the Land Use Plan first, then ensure that facilities can meet the plan.
• It is a distribution issue that will be helped when a larger water line is placed; we are working
with Westlake regarding that plan. Also, it is a regional issue; consumers need to change their
quantity of consumption.
• The water shortage problems should be fixed first...
o We will be addressing this issue further in the Water/Wastewater /Storm water Plan.
• Will the city consider incentives for residential water wells?
• Not that I am aware of; possibly in the Water Plan.
• The TCEQ regulates ground water consumption so that would have to be considered.
o It's a tough issue... we need to get smarter with irrigation.
• What about recycling gray water?
o We can explore that...
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report
is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff,
and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as
summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly
encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Attachment B:
ORDINANCE NO. 1021
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE S.H. 114 CORRIDOR PLAN AS
AN ELEMENT OF THE SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN, THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.
WHEREAS, a Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas, was approved by
the voters in a duly called Charter election on April 4, 1987; and,
WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI requires an update to the City's
comprehensive plan elements every four years,
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan is an element
of the Southlake 2030 Plan, the City's Comprehensive Master Plan,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan complies
with the Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals, & Objectives,
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan provides the
guiding principles for all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including the Land Use
and Master Thoroughfare Plans, for the S.H. 114 Corridor,
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan has been
formulated with adequate public input,
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the recommendations in the S.H. 114
Corridor Plan herein reflect the community's desires for the future development of the S.H.
114 Corridor,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City
Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this ordinance as if
copied in its entirety.
Section 2. The statements in `Exhibit 1' are hereby adopted as the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan
of the Southlake 2030 Plan.
Section 3. The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and
amended by the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office
of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake, along with a copy of the
ordinance and minute order of the Council so adopting or approving the same.
Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been
heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force until amended
by the City Council as provided herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct
conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting
provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed.
Section 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable,
and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance
shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court
of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council
without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
Section 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this
ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public,
and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be
admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production
thereof.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 21 day of February, 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 6 t " day of March, 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE: