2010-12-06 Meeting Report (Chicken Express)SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
PROJECT NAME
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION:
ZA 10 -073
Chicken Express
SPIN 4
December 6, 2010; 6 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3A 3C
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirteen (13)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Lou Hillman 4)
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Martin Schelling, Conifer Real Estate
STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I, (817)748 -8070; dcortez(a�ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at 2120 E State Highway 114; northwest of SH114 and N Kimball, just
west of Scooters.
Development Details
The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan that proposes the construction of an
approximately 3,000 square foot quick -serve restaurant with a drive thru on a 40,335
square foot lot. The applicant anticipates hours of operation will be 10:30 a.m. 10 p.m.
daily and staff 20 25 employees. This site was originally zoned industrial; an S -P -2
zoning designation was approved with the Scooter's development to include three
additional pad sites. The proposed use for this lot has been previously approved by the
original concept plan. The applicant is proposing building materials that are not standard
to Chicken Express with the use of Austin stone, Acme brick, and a metal mansard roof.
A variance is being requested regarding the requirement for a pitched roof. The
applicant stated that Chicken Express is a family- oriented business and that the
corporation involves themselves in the community.
QUESTIONS CONCERNS
How many customers will come thru on a daily basis? The intersection is crowded now.
o A traffic study has been done and submitted to the city. Also, Kimball will be
widened to a four -lane divided road in the near future.
How many square feet is the building?
o Approximately 3,046
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN
Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform
elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents
and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the
Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.