2010-03-08 Meeting Report (Childrens Medical Center)SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO. ZA10 -017
PROJECT NAME: Children's Medical Center
SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN 3
MEETING DATE: March 8, 2010
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirty -nine (39)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Randy Williamson #3)
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Chris Dougherty, Children's; David Cunningham,
project manager; Jeff Kennemer, Hines
STAFF PRESENT: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development and Lorrie
Fletcher, Planner I
S TAFF C Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748 -8069; Ifletcher @ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located on approximately ten acres in the Carillon development along the
north side of SH 114, just east of White Chapel Boulevard.
Development Details
The applicant is proposing the construction of a one -story pediatric Specialty Care
Center. Phase I is proposed as 34,000 square feet to include pediatric subspecialty
outpatient services, pediatric imaging services, pediatric ancillary and diagnostic
services, and shell space for future ambulatory surgery services. Phase II is
proposed to add approximately 35,000 square feet, expanding the services existing
in Phase I and adding multi disciplinary pediatric clinical programs. This Children's
Medical Center will not have inpatient, overnight or emergency services scheduled
services only. This proposal is not a partnership or joint venture. This facility will be
owned and operated by Children's Medical Center.
QUESTIONS CONCERNS
Will this develop reduce parking for the offices already planned to the west?
o No.
The architecture does not look like the French Renaissance theme that was
approved for Carillon... it looks Hill Country.
o We feel the colors and materials we are proposing will compliment the
surrounding European architecture.
How many patients do you anticipate?
o About 20,000 per year in Phase I. The planned hours of operation will be
Monday through Friday, 7AM to 7PM. After the expansion, volume estimates
will depend on the services offered through the expansion.
Where will the people come from?
o People usually come from a 15 mile radius.
What percentage of your current patients come from Southlake?
o We estimate at least 10% at this point; this will likely increase as services
increase.
Won't this facility replicate Baylor Grapevine and Cook's in Ft. Worth?
o Not really, Fort Worth is not easily accessible and there is very little pediatric
subspecialty care being offered at Baylor Grapevine. The medical community
and the community at -large have requested that Children's provide these
services.
Will Hine's be the landlord?
o No, this is a land sale. Children's will own and operate, however, will have to
adhere to the covenants set forth for Carillon.
When will White Chapel get widened?
o When the residential develops during the first phase.
What is the anticipated traffic flow from White Chapel?
o Approximately 30% of visitors will enter or exit at White Chapel. The
scheduled activities will maintain orderly traffic flow.
Have you talked to local physicians?
o Yes, we have gotten regional input for our needs assessment.
Are there other specialty locations?
o Children's has similar facilities in Dallas and in Plano. The need is for more of
the Specialty Care Centers throughout the region and Southlake presents the
greatest need.
What if you have a patient who unexpectedly requires inpatient care? Will you call 9-
1-1?
o This would be a rare occurrence that would require us to transport the child.
Until the Ambulatory Surgery Center is opened, we will have to call 9 -1 -1 in
these very rare instances.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.
The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed
officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general
responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the
applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.