2010-01-11 Meeting Report (Shady Oaks)SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO. ZA09 -075
PROJECT NAME: Shady Oaks
SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN 6
MEETING DATE: January 11, 2010
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Twelve (12)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Ronald Evans #10); Mike Terry #6)
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Paul Spain, Terra Land Management Inc.
STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748 -8069; Ifletcher @ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at 820 Shady Oaks Drive.
Development Details
The applicant is proposing a rezoning of a portion of the Shady Oaks development
that was zoned as SF -20 Single Family Residential District in September 2007, to R-
PUD Residential Planned Unit Development. The proposed rezoning will allow
construction of sixty -three '/3 to Y2 acre home sites on 36.5 acres. This brings the
total number of lots from 136 to 149. The applicant is not requesting any variances
with this application.
QUESTIONS CONCERNS
What will be the first section built?
o The sixteen lots adjacent to Shady Oaks Drive.
When will the wall be built?
o As the lots develop.
Is this proposed change economy driven?
o Yes, it will also enhance the market by offering two product types.
Do you anticipate any drainage issues.
o No, the property is set up in an ideal situation due to previous development to
the south.
What about fencing?
o The stone fencing along Shady Oaks Drive will continue; the remaining
fencing will be built as lots develop; we are proposing a compression wall.
Do you feel you will have enough buyers?
o Yes, long -term we feel Southlake is doing great.
What about trees?
o Trees are valuable; we have and will continue to go to great lengths to keep
as many as possible.
GENERAL CONCERNS
Fencing
Market
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.
The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed
officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general
responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the
applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.