Item 6AWinding Creek Development
Traffic Level of Service on S. Carroll Ave.
(Southlake Blvd to La Paloma Estates)
February 7, 2012
Existing North /South traffic splits
• AM Peak Hour = 64% northbound /36% southbound
• PM Peak Hour = 45% northbound /55% southbound
Link Volume LOS Analysis Results — 2012 and Build Out year (2014)
PQ 13, Halff Report — " It is important to note that the proposed development is
projected to account for only 2.9% of the total traffic on S. Carroll Avenue in the AM
peak hour, and 2.6% of the total traffic in the PM peak hour. There could be slight
delays to through traffic on northbound South Carroll Avenue if vehicles turning left into
the Winding Creek development have to wait for an acceptable gap in southbound
traffic (assuming left turn lanes are not provided at the two site access points." (see
above table)
Pg 13, Recommendation from Halff Report — "Since South Carroll is currently
operating at or near its theoretical hourly capacity during the AM and PM peak hours,
based on traffic counts of 1126 -1127, Halff suggests that the City of Southlake consider
accelerating the construction of the western half of the road, in order to accommodate
the vehicular demand currently using the road."
Staff Review of TIA: Staff engaged anther traffic engineer to review the Winding Creek
TIA to determine if the methodology used to determine the traffic impacts of the Winding
Creek development were appropriate. The traffic engineer, Lee Engineering, found that
the methodology employed in the development of the Halff report were appropriate.
Attached, please find the Lee Engineering review letter.
Recommended Solution:
Ask developer to pre -pay roadway impact fees of $127,281.48 (74 lots x $1,720.02/lot)
to provide the city immediate funding to construct additional asphalt lane on west side of
existing S. Carroll Avenue. This funding will provide the city with the necessary funds to
construct this 3 rd lane (west side). The estimated cost to construct a new asphalt traffic
lane along the western side of S. Carroll Ave. along Winding Creek development south
to La Paloma Estates is $ 97,000.
Impact fees can be used for the construction of this additional lane as capacity is added.
The construction of this asphalt lane, while not matching the permanent eastern side
which is constructed of concrete, would be an interim improvement for several (5 -10)
years until funding can be allocated in the city's Capital Improvement Project budget.
This allows other priorities currently shown in the 5 -Year CIP plan to continue as shown
for budget consideration.
The developer has indicated in conversations today that he is willing to pre -pay
the roadway impact fees if asked.
This solution allows for an immediate interim solution /improvement to the already
heavily congested peak hour traffic on S. Carroll Avenue in the area of the Winding
Creek development.
3030 LBJ FREEWAY
SUITE 1660
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234
972/248 -3006 FAX 972/248 -3855
TOLL FREE 888/298 -3006
Urica rcnain
February 7, 2012
Mr. Gordon Mayer, P.E.
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 320
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: Proposed Winding Creek Traffic Impact Analysis Review
Mr. Mayer:
Per your request, we have reviewed the traffic impact study for the proposed "Winding Creek"
prepared by Halff Associates, Inc. and dated January 31, 2012. The proposed development is
located to the west side of South Carroll Avenue south of FM 1709 in Southlake, Texas. We
offer the following comments on the submitted traffic impact analysis:
• A site plan is provided for the development in the TIA`s appendix. The proposed
development is comprised of 74 single family residential units and is planned to be
completed by 2014 with construction starting in the middle of 2012.
• The trip generation estimates were correctly developed using the equations provided by
the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The development is projected to generate 788
daily trips with 62 trips during the AM peak hour and 80 trips during the PM peak hour.
• The trip distribution percentages appear to be reasonable and are based on the existing
traffic patterns during the AM and PM peak hours on South Carroll Avenue.
• Twenty -four (24) hour traffic volumes and turning movement counts were collected and
are provided in the report's appendix. To estimate the background traffic volumes at
build -out, the consultant used an annual growth rate of 6% which significantly exceeds
typical growth rates. Consequently, the results obtained are conservative estimates of
fixture operating conditions. We do not recommend changes to this growth estimate.
• Based on the site layout, majority of the trips are expected to use the northern site access
point. We would have like to see a higher proportion of northbound trips use the northern
access point. However, we generally agree with the site traffic assignment made by the
consultant and do not recommend any changes at this time.
• The report indicates that the westbound approach to the existing intersection of South
Carroll Avenue and Westmont Drive currently operates at poor levels of service.
Additionally, the eastbound approach to the intersection of South Carroll Avenue and
North Access is projected to operate at poor level of service. Some discussion of this poor
level of service should be included in the report.
• Although capacity analyses indicate that the northbound left turn movement at the North
Access location is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service, simulation
analysis performed using SimTraffic indicates that a maximum queue of 225 feet and 95`
percentile queue of 125 feet can be expected at this location on South Carroll Avenue
during the PM peak hour. Although left turn deceleration lanes are not required based on
the City's guidelines provided in Driveway Ordinance No. 634, stopping the heavy
northbound through movement could be avoided if a northbound left turn lane was
provided. Left turn deceleration analysis performed by using TxDOT's criteria indicates
that the South Carroll Avenue at North Access location does meet the requirements for
the provision of a left turn lane.
• The site plan for the proposed residential development includes a stubbed out street to the
west that will serve the adjacent property that is shown as residential on the City of
Southlake's land -use plan. If and when this property is developed, the northbound left
turn traffic volumes at the South Carroll Avenue and North Access location are expected
to increase.
• The provision of a northbound left turn lane will have a negligible impact on the traffic
operations at the intersection of South Carroll Avenue and Westmont Drive. However, if
a left turn lane is not provided, left turn vehicles would block the northbound through
vehicles creating gaps in traffic flow along South Carroll Avenue, thereby helping the
westbound traffic at the intersection of South Carroll Avenue and Westmont Drive to
complete their maneuver.
Link analysis results indicate that South Carroll Avenue currently operates at poor levels
of service and will continue to operate at poor levels of service under 2014 background
and total traffic conditions. South Carroll Avenue is classified as an Arterial in the City
of Southlake's Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan. If the roadway is widened to a
four -lane section, the roadway is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under
2014 traffic conditions. Additionally, widening of South Carroll Avenue is projected to
reduce the delay for the cross - street approaches to South Carroll Avenue.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (972) 248 -3006. We appreciate the opportunity
to provide these and are available to address any additional comments or concerns.
Sincerely,
Jos ph T. Short, P.E., PTOE
President
Exhibit A
Winding Creek
Phase I
Design Guidelines
February 1, 2012
Winding Creek, Southlake, Texas
Terra /Shady Oaks Development
Preface
"New world luxury, old world charm" sets the standard for the quality of lifestyle
you'll experience living in this neighborhood. Winding Creek will be an exclusive
community of luxury estate homes all inspired by Old World European design in the
prestigious city of Southlake, Texas. Each custom residence will be designed to reflect a
specific style of European architecture including English, French, Italian and German.
Creativity and personal touches are strongly encouraged within the boundaries
established in this book as set by the Design Review Committee (DRC). These
guidelines will ensure the quality of the entire community while protecting the lasting
value of your home's investment. It is the desire of the DRC to facilitate the
development of a residential community that portrays a timeless elegance that can be
preserved for generations.
OA
Table of Contents
Preface
1: Introduction
1.1 Intent of Guidelines
1.2 Design Review Committee
2: Architectural Styles
2.1 General Guidelines
2.2 Styles
a. French
b. English Tudor
c. Tuscan
d. German (South Texas Hill Country)
3: Architectural Guidelines
3.1 Building Height
3.2 Roof
3.3 Building Massing
3.4 Exterior Walls & Finishes
3.5 Chimneys
3.6 Doors & Windows
3.7 In -house Sprinkler System
3.8 Accessory Structures
4: Site Development
4.1 Building Setbacks
4.2 Lot Coverage
4.3 Easements
4.4 Lot Grading and Drainage
4.5 Driveways, Sidewalks, & Parking
4.6 Outdoor Living Spaces & Detached Structures
4.7 Tree Preservation
4.8 Pool & Spa
4.9 Service Yards & Utility Areas
4.10 Walls & Fencing
4.11 Lighting
4.12 Residence Identification
5: Landscape Requirements
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Landscape Guidelines
5.3 Irrigation Requirements
5.4 Meters
5.5 Drainage
6: Design Review Procedures
6.1 Design Review Procedures
2
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
3
6.2 Plan Submittal
15
7: Construction and Builder Regulations
15
7.1 Construction Area
15
7.2 Working Hours
15
7.3 Debris & Trash
15
7.4 Signage
15
7.5 Disturbances
15
Exhibit A
16
1: Introduction
1.1 Intent of Guidelines
The guidelines set forth in the book have been carefully written in order to create
a harmonious community and preserve the quality of each resident's investment in their
home. These guidelines are to be the standard that all residences to be built in Winding
Creek will follow. These guidelines will be administered and enforced by the Winding
Creek Design Review Committee (DRC). It is the intent of the DRC to allow for
creativity, individuality, and personal expression to be encouraged while staying within
the limits of necessary restrictions created for the good of all residents.
All new residences, additions and alterations to existing residences, site work, and
landscaping will require approval of the DRC.
In order to preserve the quality of life and investment for all home owners the
following areas will be the focus of the guidelines set forth in this book:
a. Purity of chosen Architectural style and quality as shown throughout history in
regards to size, scale, materials, and colors
b. Consideration of the privacy of residents including visual boundaries
c. Establishment of visually appealing exteriors — including landscape, lighting, and
parking
1.2 Design Review Committee
a. The Design Review Committee (DRC) will consist of all plans for construction being
reviewed and approved by the developer until the Homeowner's Association assumes
control of the development.
b. The DRC shall have the right to amend, adopt, or repeal any rules or regulations set
forth in these guidelines.
c. The DRC shall make decisions without prejudice, striving to maintain a consistency
throughout the development. The DRC shall be held non - liable for any damage or
loss suffered or claimed by owners, builders, or contractors with reference to approval
or disapproval of plans and submittals.
2: Architectural Styles
2.1 General Guidelines
a. All residences within the Winding Creek community should reflect consistent
architectural detailing that is appropriate for one of the approved styles. These styles
include French, English Tudor, and Tuscan. Each residence should strive within its
detailing to reflect the history and heritage of the chosen architectural style to
preserve the visual authenticity of that style.
0
2.2 Styles
a. French:
The French style of architecture, specifically a French Eclectic style was brought
to America after World War I where many Americans served in France and were able
to see first hand the elegance and distinctive style of the French. French homes are
typically characterized by their steeply pitched hipped roofs, flared eaves, brick, stone
or stucco walls, and occasionally decorative half - timbering.
French homes can be divided into three sub types. These include symmetrical,
asymmetrical and towered. When the front elevation is symmetrical there is typically
a massive hipped roof with dormers that are arched, circular, hipped or gabled, evenly
spaced across the front of the home. In an asymmetrical design the style, while
similar to the symmetrical at the roof, contains off - center entryways and
asymmetrical facades. Some French homes contain a prominent round tower with a
conical roof. The tower typically serves as the main entryway.
French homes can vary in style but all generally hold to more formal Renaissance
detailing. Beautiful detailing such as French doors, stone quoins, pilasters, pediments,
and decorative railings can all be utilized to create an elegant and luxurious
appearance.
VA
b.
English Tudor:
What can be characterized as English Tudor today is what has been loosely based
on various Medieval English homes, ranging from thatch - roofed folk cottages to
grand manor houses. English Tudor can be distinguished from the French style
primarily by the use of gables rather than hipped roofs.
These homes are typically made of brick or stone and can often contain half -
timbered decorative details on the fagade and heavy chimneys. Large chimneys are
found on nearly all Tudor homes and have complex masonry patterns on their lower
halves. Overlapping gables, parapets and beautifully patterned brick or stone are all
historic details which add to the charm of the Tudor style. Parapeted gables can be
found on the more formal English Tudor homes built in America from about 1895 to
:)f.
c. Tuscan:
Tuscan architecture is often described as having a "simple grandeur ". The great
Italian masters had an ability to combine the rustic with the polished to create an
elegant estate built from masses of stone and timber.
The style today is characterized by stucco or stone exterior and a clay barrel tile
roof. Unlike the French and Tudor styles the Italian homes feature low sloped roof
lines with either hips or gables. The roof typically has a large overhang sometimes
with exposed wood rafter tails.
Originally built to be a natural part of the rolling hills of the Tuscany region in
Italy, these homes blend in beautifully with natural surroundings and often feature
extensive outdoor living areas such as patios, courtyards and terraces. The overall
feeling is one of warmth which is reflected in the color schemes of natural earth tones
found in Tuscan homes.
3: Architectural Guidelines
3.1 Building Height
a. Height Measurement — Height will be measured from the finished lot grade to the
midpoint of the highest pitched or hipped roof above. The measurement locations
will be chosen based upon which points are most restrictive.
b. Height Guidelines — The maximum height shall be limited to 30' -0" or as approved.
3.2 Roof
E
a. Design — Roof design and slope must be appropriate for the chosen architectural style.
It is highly encouraged that all roofs be designed with careful attention to the slope of
the roof. Moderate to steep roofs are encouraged and flat roofs are discouraged. The
roof must show matching pitches at all visible hips. Minimum roof pitch shall be
10/12 on all styles except Tuscan. Tuscan style homes shall have a minimum roof
pitch of 6/12.
b. Mechanical Equipment — Mechanical equipment may not be visible on roof structures.
c. Vents — Plumbing vents should be minimally visible from the street. If there must be
a vent visible to the street then it should blend in color with the roof.
d. Material — Roof material should be appropriate to the design style chosen. Metal
roofing is allowed in small areas as a detail element and should typically be made of
copper. Thirty -five year composition shingle roofing is acceptable on the French and
English Tudor styles. For Tuscan style homes a concrete or clay barrel tile roof shall
be required. Roofing materials must be submitted for approval prior to installation
and labeled on all submitted elevations.
e. Guttering — All street front roof guttering and downspouts on each residence must be
half - round. All other roof guttering can be standard metal guttering with color
matching trim.
3.3 Building Massing
a. Primary massing of the residence should be a reflection of the primary interior rooms
within the residence. Secondary massing should be a reflection of the secondary
interior rooms within the residence. The concept is to design homes with simple roof
lines that reflect the interior spaces that are being housed.
b. Massing should not try to lump several interior rooms together into one dominant
mass.
3.4 Exterior Walls & Finishes
a. Acceptable Materials:
i. Brick
ii. Stone
iii. Cast Stone
iv. Stucco
v. Masonite/Hardi Siding allowed on side and rear elevations not to exceed 20% of
wall area
b. Unacceptable Materials:
i. E.F.I.S.
c. Material Variation — The exterior materials must be authentic and not artificial. There
shall not be more than three exterior materials (including exterior walls, window /door
surrounds, accents, etc.) The DRC will evaluate whether additional materials shall be
allowed on a case by case basis.
d. Colors — Colors should be appropriate to the architectural style chosen. Colors should
be non - invasive and subdued rather than bold and bright. All exterior materials
should comply with one color palate including all exterior paint, brick/stone, trim,
mortar, window mullions, balusters, columns, etc.)
3.5 Chimneys
a. All chimneys shall be 100% masonry (stone, brick or stucco) no wood allowed.
3.6 Doors & Windows
10
a. Acceptable Windows:
i. All windows must be equal to aluminum clad wood or vinyl with exterior muntins.
All window brands must be submitted for approval prior to installation. ( Muntins
cannot be located between the panes of glass).
ii. Windows shall be appropriate to style, size and shape as consistent with chosen
architectural style.
iii. All windows on all sides of the residence must have exterior muntins made of
vinyl or have no muntins.
b. Unacceptable Windows:
i. Aluminum
ii. Windows with muntins "trapped" between glass panes
iii. Skylights that are visible from the street
c. Window Details
i. Windows may not be of reflective or darkly tinted glass.
ii. Windows must be consistent in size, shape, style and detail throughout the entire
residence.
iii. Shutters (when used) should "fit the window" and appear to be fully operable.
iv. Windows must be compliant with all fire and safety regulations.
d. Doors
i. Doors shall me made of wood, multi -paned glass, decorative iron, metal or
fiberglass..
ii. Doors with muntins should have them placed on the exterior of the glass panes
rather than being "trapped" inside them.
e. Garage Doors
i. All garage doors shall be made equal to sectional wood or wood -clad. Decorative
fiberglass doors may be used if submitted for approval and accepted by the DRC.
ii. Garage doors shall be placed at right angles to the street where possible. If this is
not possible then a single garage door may face the street with a minimum setback
of twenty feet from the front building line. Front facing garage door must be
screened at the building line with a wing -wall and drive gate at least six feet tall.
All other special conditions must be submitted to the DRC for approval. The
DRC will take in to account the size /shape of the lot and the surrounding
landscape in determining special garage placement conditions.
3.7 In -House Sprinkler System: All residences will contain in -house sprinkler systems
if required by the City of Southlake.
3.8 Accessory Structures: All structures on one lot must reflect consistently the same
architectural style as the main residence.
4: Site Development
4.1 Building Setbacks
a. Each individual lot shall be required to maintain and meet the minimum requirements
as set forth by the City of Southlake Zoning Regulations.
b. In addition to the City of Southlake requirements, Winding Creek will require a
minimum 30' -0" front building line, 10' -0" side yard building lines, and a 25' -0" rear
building line on all lots except for four cul -de -sac "pie- shaped" lots.
4.2 Lot Coverage
11
a. The footprint of the main level of each residence shall not exceed 40% of the entire
area of the lot. Footprint is defined as all areas that are contained within four walls
and garages. (Excludes open porches, patios, porte chocheres, etc.)
b. Each residence shall contain a minimum of 3,500 s.f. living space and a 3 -car garage.
4.3 Easements
a. It shall be the responsibility of the owner/builder to review the plat and locate any and
all utility and drainage easements on the site.
b. No structure shall be allowed to encroach within any and all easements.
c. Landscaping and driveways are allowed within the easement and must be maintained
by the homeowner.
4.4 Lot Grading and Drainage
a. All grading, excavation, fill, drainage, and site work designed and installed shall meet
the City of Southlake requirements.
b. Every effort should be made to save as many existing trees as possible.
c. Each residential design should strive to blend in with the existing topography of the
lot and in no case shall there be retaining walls greater than 4' -0" in height. Each
retaining wall at its end points should blend in to the existing grade.
4.5 Driveways, Sidewalks & Parking
a. All driveways, sidewalks, and parking areas shall be made of concrete, stone, or
pavestone and shall be patterned or stained and textured.
4.6 Outdoor Living Spaces & Detached Structures
a. All outdoor living spaces and detached structures shall meet the requirements of the
City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance.
b. The maximum height of all detached structures shall be no more than 18' -0 ".
c. The design of all structures on the lot shall reflect the architectural styling, material
selection, quality, and colors of the primary residence.
4.7 Tree Preservation
a. Tree preservation must adhere to the requirements of the City of Southlake Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
b. Each lot shall contain no less than four 4" minimum caliper trees. This can be
accomplished through the use of existing or new trees. Two of the four trees must be
"street -scape trees ".
4.8 Pool & Spa
a. Pools shall be a minimum of 10' -0" from the property lines.
b. With consideration to adjacent estates pools, spas, and any game courts or
recreational equipment should be located so as to be screened from view and sound
insulated from neighboring lots and streets. All are subject to the approval of the
DRC.
c. Pool and recreational lighting shall not exceed two foot candles at property lines.
d. Pool lines must be tied into the sewer line.
e. Pools must be fenced in compliance with National pool safety laws.
4.9 Service Yards & Utility Areas
a. A service yard is an area designated for the storage of trash, maintenance tools,
firewood, pool equipment, air conditioning equipment, mechanical equipment, etc.
These areas must be screened from public view by a 6' -0" minimum mature height
landscaping material.
12
b. Electric meters, telephone panels, etc. must be screened from public view as well.
They may be located in the service yard, mechanical room or meter closets. These
should all be designed to resemble the primary residence and not be facing the street.
c. Only storage buildings designed by a Registered Architect and submitted to the DRC
for approval will be allowed.
4.10 Walls & Fencing
a. Front yard fences that are visible from the street shall be a minimum of 6' -0" in
height and must be constructed of wrought iron.
b. Any fencing that is adjacent to common green space, or open space shall be a
minimum of 6' -0" in height and must be constructed of wrought iron.
c. Fencing between two properties shall be 6' -0" in height and shall be board on board
cedar on metal posts.
d. All fencing and walls must not supersede items on the PUD Exhibit.
4.11 Lighting
a. All exterior lighting must be decorative style fixtures. Cut sheets must be provided
for approval by the DRC.
b. Any lighting that is used to accent landscaping, residential wall features, etc. must be
ground mounted up- lighting with shields to block glare from the street or adjacent
properties.
4.12 Residence Identification
a. Each residence shall have a standard Winding Creek cast stone address number block
located on the front elevation.
b. Standard cast iron Winding Creek mailbox shall be located at each U.S. Postal
approved location.
5: Landscape Requirements
5.1 Introduction
It is the intent of the DRC to facilitate the development of a luxurious community
that enhances the quality of life for all residents. It is imperative that the landscape of
each residence follows specific and consistent guidelines in order to preserve the value
and integrity of the community. All residents must comply with the landscape guidelines
set forth in this manual. The overall goal of these guidelines is for the landscaping to be
harmonious throughout the entire community with no incompatibilities between planting
styles. The DRC must use a subiective determination in approving all landscape plans.
5.2 Landscape Guidelines
a. The maintenance of these standards will be the responsibility of the homeowners
under the rules of the HOA once the developer has passed control on to the HOA.
b. Consideration to the local climate and soil conditions must be taken when choosing
plant material species. Foreign or Tropical plants are not encouraged unless as an
understated accent plant.
c. In order to soften the scale of the main structures, large specimen trees must be
planted. The arrangement of trees should be aesthetically pleasing and without too
many competing varieties.
d. All new planted shade trees shall be a minimum of 4" in caliper.
13
e. Tree preservation must adhere to the requirements of the City of Southlake Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
f. Each lot shall contain no less than four 4" minimum caliper trees. This can be
accomplished through the use of existing or new trees. Two of the four trees must be
"street - scape" trees.
5.3 Irrigation Requirements
a. All areas must be fully irrigated with an automatically controlled underground
irrigation system with a water management program.
b. Where possible pop -up style sprinkler heads should be used to minimize visual
intrusion and all equipment must be screened from public view with landscaping.
c. All irrigation plans must be signed and sealed by a licensed Irrigator in the State of
Texas.
5.4 Meters
Meters should be sized to be able to handle the water usage of each residence in
order to prevent a reduction in water pressure to the house.
5.5 Drainage
There should always be a positive surface flow maintained that prevents water
drainage from flowing towards any structure. Damage could result to the soils supporting
the house if drainage is not flowing properly away from areas of concern.
6: Design Review Procedures
6.1 Design Review Procedures
The following outlined procedures must be followed by anyone wishing to
construct a new residence, new addition to a residence, make improvements on the site or
landscape, or remodel an existing residence within the Winding Creek community. The
DRC will closely adhere to the guidelines set forth in this book in order to preserve the
reputation and quality of Winding Creek. It is entirely up to the discretion of the DRC to
determine subjectively the appropriateness of all submitted ideas in regards to the
aesthetic appearance and value of what is proposed.
6.2 Plan Submittal
Prior to the start of construction of a new residence the Builder shall submit two
copies of the Construction Drawings for review by the DRC. One copy will be returned
marked: Approved for Construction or Approved as noted for Construction or
Disapproved as noted.
7: Construction and Builder Regulations
7.1 Construction Area
a. Construction activity should not impose on neighboring lots or residences. All
activity is required to stay on the owner's lot. All materials, vehicles, and equipment
must stay within the boundary of the lot.
b. Each site must provide its own sanitary facilities.
7.2 Working Hours
14
r
All working hours are to comply with the hours set forth by the City of Southlake
at the time of construction.
7.3 Debris and Trash
In no circumstance may any debris, material, trash etc be placed on any other lot
or property. The site and streets must be kept clean and maintained on a daily basis.
Trash containers shall be maintained during the duration of construction and kept from
overflowing at all times.
7.4 Signage
Only one "Builder Sign" allowed per lot.
7.5 Disturbances
Noise, trash, and traffic impacts should be minimal during the construction
process. It is the responsibility of the builder and contractor's to keep all vehicles and
materials on the lot and out of the flow of traffic or neighboring property. Loud music
will not be permitted.
J�
Exhibit A
.
15
� .
13 SOUTHLAKE
CITY OF
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
February 7, 2012
CASE NO: ZA11 -061
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Winding Creek
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Terra Land Management is requesting approval of a zoning change and development
plan on property described as Tracts 4, 4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F and portions of Tracts 4D
and 4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas and currently addressed as 400, 430, 450, 480, 500 and 540, S. Carroll
Ave. and 1001 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: AG —
Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: R -PUD — Residential Planned Unit
Development District. SPIN Neighborhood # 7.
REQUEST: Terra Land Management is requesting approval of a zoning change and development
plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
District to develop 74 residential lots on approximately 46.65 acres.
The applicant's responses to the City Council conditions of approval at first reading on
January 3, 2012 are as follows:
Council Condition of Approval at 1 St
Applicant's Response
Readin
Funds for the Zena Rucker portion of the
The applicant has agreed to this condition.
property that abuts the north side will be
placed in escrow by month 36 for its
portion of the right -of -way acquisition for
completion of that roadway.
There will be appropriate roundabout
The development plan has been revised to
dedication for the Zena Rucker
show the roundabout dedication and the
roundabout located at the northwest
plat will be revised accordingly.
corner of the property.
Fencing on the northwest corner will be
The development plan has been revised to
comprised of wrought iron with cedar
show the fencing as requested.
slats along the western boundary for Lots
1, 2 and 3; as indicated in the site plan
summary there is a stone fence that is
along Zena Rucker Road and then
beginning along the two -acre "notch out"
in the northeast corner of the parkway
continuing with the same cedar and
wrought iron fencing Lots 5-12).
Case No.
ZA11 -061
Applicant is to keep the existing stone
The applicant has agreed to this condition.
walls and hardscaping in place and also
inspect the same for safety to determine
any needed repairs going forward in the
development.
The trail at the southwest corner of the
The applicant has agreed to this condition.
property that is shown to connect into the
adjacent property to the west is proposed
to stop at the existing street and funds
are to be escrowed for the remaining
portion in the event it is developed in the
future.
The applicant will come forward at the
Details of the primary entrances were
public hearing with more detail on the
presented at the January 17, 2012
p rimary entrances.
meetin
Show more landscaping detail for the
Details of the landscaping buffer were
buffer along the southeastern portion of
presented at the January 17, 2012
the property between Carroll and the
meeting
p roposed street.
The applicant's representation for
Details of the garage locations were
garages facing the street would be
presented at the January 17, 2012
behind the primary building line and
meeting
applicant will provide clarification and
location of such garages at the next
meeting.
ACTION NEEDED:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
At the request of City Council at their January 17, 2012 meeting, the applicant has
provided a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The Executive Summary of the TIA is
included in Attachment C (page 6) along with a link to the entire document. The TIA is
under review by City staff and comments will be provided at the February 7, 2012
meeting. A minimum floor area of 3,500 square feet as stated during the meeting on
January 17, 2012 has been added to the development regulations and a letter
summarizing what the applicant has agreed to provide has been submitted by the
applicant and is also included in Attachment C (page 3).
Consider 2nd reading approval of a zoning change and development plan
(The public hearing was held at the January 17, 2012 meeting)
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Report dated October 17, 2011
(E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 7, 2012
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 480 -614
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
Ken Baker (748 -8067)
Richard Schell (748 -8602)
Case No.
ZA11 -061
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Terra Land Management, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located south of E. Southlake Blvd. and west of S. Carroll Ave. at
400, 430, 450, 480, 500 and 540, S. Carroll Ave. and 1001 E. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 4, 4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F and portions of Tracts 4D and 4G, Obediah W.
Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "AG Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends S. Carroll Ave. to be a four lane
divided arterial with eighty -eight (88) feet of right -of -way and the future Zena
Rucker Rd. to be a two lane collector with sixty (60) feet of right of way.
Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plan for S. Carroll Ave.
The southern right of way line for the future Zena Rucker Rd. is the northern
property line for this development. The applicant has agreed to construct the
portion of Zena Rucker Rd. adjacent to the Winding Creek development when
the internal road within the development is extended to Zena Rucker with
Phase II of the development if that portion of Zena Rucker has not already
been constructed as part of the development of the properties to the north.
Construction of the proposed eight (8) foot multi -use trail will be required with
construction of Zena Rucker Rd.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The approved concept plan proposes that the site will have two (2) accesses
directly onto S. Carroll Ave. and one access onto the future Zena Rucker Rd.
The Zena Rucker connection will not be constructed until Phase II of the
development is underway.
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: The Pathways Master Plan shows a planned eight (8) foot plus, multi -use trail
along the west side of S. Carroll Ave. and a proposed eight (8) foot, multi -use
trail along the future extension of Zena Rucker Rd. from Byron Nelson
Parkway to S. Carroll Ave. The eight (8) foot multi -use trail along the west side
of S. Carroll Ave. is shown on the proposed development plan. The proposed
eight (8) foot trail along the future Zena Rucker Rd. will be provided at the time
that portion of the road is constructed. An eight (8) foot plus , multi -use trail is
also proposed from S. Carroll Ave. through the property to connect with the
Zena Rucker property to the west. An on- street bikeway is planned on S.
Carroll Ave.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA11 -061 Page 1
WATER & SEWER: A 12 -inch water line and a 10 -inch sewer line exist in S. Carroll Ave. to serve
the property.
DRAINAGE: The drainage from this development is generally to the south and southwest
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed Tree Conservation Analysis is attached. The Development Plan
Review Summary includes a comment to provide additional information on the
analysis to include, at a minimum, the approximate area of the trees to be
preserved and the percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved.
SOUTHLAKE 2030
PLAN: Carroll /1709 Small Area Plan Recommendations
The Carroll /1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September 20, 2011. The
following recommendations are relevant to the medium density cluster residential area
designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map (below chart).
Ref.
Issue
Recommendation
No.
LU3
1. Land use designation Medium
Retain the Medium Density Residential
Density Residential
designation for the area south of Zena
Rucker Road
2. Considerable amount of area
dedicated to floodplain and other
Encourage "cluster" residential
water features
development
Preserve heavily wooded areas,
especially within drainage areas and
floodplain
E2
1. Environmental stewardship and
Encourage water reuse for irrigation
innovation in green building
Encourage green building design
2. Reserved open space /landscape
practices
areas require heavy irrigation
Preserve and enhance existing ponds
3. On -site drainage detention facilities
Reflect the desired preservation on the
Carroll /1709 Small Area Illustrative Map
on the Environmental Resource
Protection map
M1
1. Desire to decrease dependence on
Development should be pedestrian
the automobile for everyday needs
oriented, emphasizing pedestrian
connectivity in any residential areas.
2. Two schools, shopping and offices
all within close proximity of the site
Provide passive trails through preserved
natural areas which also provide
connectivity to the sidewalk system
M2
1. Round -a -bout approved at
Consider a roundabout at the
intersection of "Plaza Drive" and
intersection of Rucker and the
Zena Rucker Road
north -south connector
M3
1. Create a vibrant and appealing
Provide curvilinear streets
streetscape along the area's local
streets
Provide street trees between the
sidewalk and the street curb
Case No. Attachment A
ZA11 -061 Page 1
Ref.
No.
Issue
Recommendation
M4
1. A landscaped parkway concept with
Consider the creation of a new 60' ROW
minimal pavement is desired for
2- lane divided collector (C2D) with
Zena Rucker Road
medians and left- turn /stacking lanes at
intersections in the Mobility Plan to
2. Landscaped medians preferred
apply to Zena Rucker Road
3. No on- street, parallel parking is
"Urban" cross section which includes
desired
curb, gutters, medians, street trees and
sidewalks.
Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
Design as a local slow movement
roadway.
U2
1. Appropriately buffer and screen
Recommend a parkway buffer and street
residential south of Zena Rucker
trees adjacent to Rucker Road.
Road from any non - residential uses
to the north side of Zena Rucker
Road
Case No.
ZA11 -061
Carroll /1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map
Attachment A
Page 1
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: December 8, 2011; Approved (5 -0), noting the applicant's willingness to put up
an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the west property boundary at the
onset of the development of the project and subject to Development Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated December 1, 2011.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: January 3, 2012; Approved (7 -0), subject to the following stipulations: funds for
the Zena Rucker portion of the property that abuts the north side will be placed
in escrow by month 36 for its portion of the right -of -way acquisition for
completion of that roadway; there will be appropriate roundabout dedication for
the Zena Rucker roundabout located at the northwest corner of the property;
fencing on the northwest corner will be comprised of wrought iron with cedar
slats along the western boundary for Lots 1, 2 and 3; as indicated in the site
plan summary there is a stone fence that is along Zena Rucker Road and then
beginning along the two -acre "notch out" in the northeast corner of the
parkway continuing with the same cedar and wrought iron fencing (Lots 5 -12);
applicant to keep the existing stone walls and hardscaping in place and also
inspect the same for safety to determine any needed repairs going forward in
the development; the southwest corner of the property for the indicated trail
plan into the adjacent property located to the west is proposed to stop at the
existing street and funds to be escrowed for the remaining portion to the
property located to the southwest in the event it is developed in the future;
applicant will come forward at the public hearing with more detail on the
primary entrances —along the north side of the property at Zena Rucker,
primary entrance along Carroll and secondary entrance along the south
portion of Carroll; show more landscaping detail for the buffer along the
southeastern portion of the property between Carroll and the proposed street;
applicant's representation for garages facing the street would be behind the
primary building line and applicant will provide clarification and location of such
garages at the next meeting; and subject to the development plan review
summary No. 3, dated December 27, 2011.
January 17, 2012; City Council approved a motion (6 -0) to table the item
to the February 7, 2012 meeting to obtain a traffic study.
STAFF COMMENTS: Development Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 7, 2012 is
attached.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA11 -061 Page 1
Vicinity Map
Winding Creek
ZA11 -061
Zoning Change and
Development Plan
400 - 540, S. Carroll Ave. and
N 1001 E. Southlake Blvd.
w
0 625 1,250 2,500
S
Feet
Case No.
ZA11 -061
Attachment B
Page 1
Residential Planned United Development District -
Land Use and Development Regulations
for the 46.65 acre development known as
Winding Creek
Southlake, Texas
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the
City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it
pertains to the "SF -20A" Single - Family Residential zoning district and the City of
Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following
exceptions:
Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than fifteen thousand
(15,000) square feet.
Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty (30)
feet.
Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of twenty -five (25) feet.
Lot Width: All lots shall meet the lot width requirements of the "SF -20A"
district (100') except for the following lots:
Block 1, Lot 2: 95'.
Block 3, Lot 13: 90'
Block 3, Lot 15: 99'
Block 5, Lot 5: 87'
Block 6, Lot 3: 96'
Block 6, Lot 5: 92'
Lot widths shall be measured at the Front Yard setback line for
each lot as indicated on the Zoning Development Plan.
Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not
exceeding forty percent (40 %) of the lot area, except the sum
total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet.
Minimum House Size: All houses shall be a minimum of 3,500 s.f. in area.
A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along the internal street
frontage of all Residential Lots. Sidewalks and trails within the Open Space Lots
shall be as shown on the Zoning Development Plan and Pedestrian Access Plan.
Streets shall have a 40' R -O -W, with 30' of paving.
Case No. Hiiacnmeni C
ZA11 -061 Page 1
Open Space Management Plan:
All Common Open Space shall be owned and maintained by the Winding Creek
Homeowners Association (HOA). All other areas shall be the responsibility of the
individual property owners, including the front yards and required streetscape
trees of the residential lots. All property owners shall be required to be a
member of the HOA. Dues assessments, required for the maintenance of the
common areas and other HOA activities, shall be mandatory.
The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the protected
open space within the development. The expenses required to maintain the
common areas at a quality level shall be estimated annually by the HOA Board,
and dues shall be determined and assessed on each property owner in an
equitable fashion at such a rate as necessary to maintain such a level of quality.
Authority to enforce these requirements, and to place a lien on the property if
such dues are not paid, shall be in the form of written Deed Restrictions and
Covenants, agreed to by all property owners at purchase, and shall run with the
land.
Provisions shall be made, in the HOA bylaws and Deed Restrictions, that in the
unlikely event the HOA fails to maintain all or a portion of the protected open
space in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not
required to, assume responsibility for it's maintenance and take corrective action,
including the provision of extended maintenance. The costs of such maintenance
may be charged to the HOA or individual property owners that make up the
HOA, and may include administrative costs and penalties which shall become a
lien on all property in the development.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA11 -061 Page 2
APPLICANT'S SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS
TERRA LAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
February 1, 2012
Mr. Kenneth Baker
1400 Main St.
Suite 310
Southlake, TX 76092
Dear Mr. Baker:
Below is a summary of the items we agree to include in our zoning submission.
1. Complete a TIA by the next meeting, addressing traffic at all three entries.
2. Build an 8' stained wood fence along the western boundary, using metal posts with
screws, not nails, to be maintained by the HOA.
3. Provide a gate and paved drive for Zena's emergency use, separate from the trail and in
an easement, also to be maintained by the HOA.
4. Garage arrangement as presented to have a gate on all drives leading to a front facing
garage.
5. Minimum house size of 3,500 s.f.
6. Escrow funds for adjacent portion of Zena Rucker Road, the sidewalk leading to the
Rucker property in the SW corner of the development, as well as the 8' trail along
Carroll Avenue, from Carroll Pond to our northern boundary.
7. Keep the majority of the existing stonework that Mr. Prade built, subject to a soundness
and safety evaluation.
8. Build stone masonry wall along Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road frontages and at
entries, as presented.
9. All garage doors shall be made of decorative cedar, with no more than three stain colors.
10. All trails within the open space shall be contained within Access Easements.
11. We will build five head -in parking spaces at the city park for visitors.
12. Deed restrictions shall be comparable with those in Estes Park, Shady Oaks, etc.
Sincerely,
�� Sp .
I
Terra Land Management, Inc.
** 395 W. Northwest Parkway, Suite 300 * Southlake, Texas 76092 * Ph 817 -410 -9201 * Fax 817 -410 -9205 **
Case No. Attachment C
ZA11 -061 Page 3
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTED AT IT READING JAN. 3, 2012
66
33 a
I
it
lij
fil a
111111 HIM ilfi I
Case No.
ZA1 1 -061
o
�
�
3o
U
C
0
'Jill
• POO
v .
it
M IR
All
C:
a—
Ul)
U)
u
4-+
U
(v
- 0
06 4-
E
a-
0
Attachment C
Page 4
sit
'Jill
v .
93
M IR
6
��
Attachment C
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTED AT 2 ND READING JAN. 17, 2012
- 1 t - 1:
I
to
M
-*u
C:
fu
0-
Ln
Ln
ai
U
u
fo
d.
.
06
2
C
(ii
rn
E -21
0
X X
Cr
WI-2
L -A
0
Case No. Attachment C
ZA1 1-061 Page 5
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LINK TO ENTIRE DOCUMENT
Winding Creek January 31, 2012
South Carroll Avenue AVO 28610
Southlake, Texas
Executive Summary
Halff Associates, Inc. (Halft) conducted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) on behalf of DeOtte,
Inc., for the proposed new single - family residential development, called "Winding Creek," to be
located on the west side of South Carroll Avenue south of FM 1709 in Southlake, Texas.
Construction of the development is scheduled to begin in April / May of 2012, with the full build
out of 74 residential lots expected by 2014.
Halff conducted the TIA at the direction of the City of Southlake. The TIA focused on access to
the site from two proposed streets along South Carroll Avenue. The TIA also addressed the need
for left turn deceleration lanes at the two streets, and the development's impacts to through traffic
on South Carroll Avenue.
Halff conducted weekday AM and PM peak period turning movement traffic counts at the South
Carroll Avenue / Westmont Drive intersection on Thursday and Friday, January 26 and 27, 2012.
Halff also conducted a 24 -hour directional traffic count along South Carroll Avenue south of
Westmont Drive on Thursday and Friday, January 26 and 27, 2012. The existing (2012) AM and
PM peak hour traffic volumes were identified from the traffic count data, and these volumes
were increased by an annual growth rate to estimate the build out (2014) traffic volumes at the
study intersections and along the study road.
Halff generated trips for the proposed development assuming frill build out (74 lots), and
distributed them at the two proposed site access points along South Carroll Avenue and at the
South Carroll Avenue / Westmont Drive intersection. (A third access point is planned along the
future extension of Zena Rucker Road on the north side of the development. Since it is not
known when this road will be in place, Halff presented a conservative analysis scenario
assuming all development traffic has to enter and exit the site via South Carroll Avenue.) These
development trips were then added to the estimated build out year (2014) background volumes at
the study intersections and along the study road to give the projected total (background plus site)
traffic volumes for the study analysis scenarios. Halff then conducted AM and PM peak hour
analyses of the site access points and the South Carroll Avenue / Westmont Drive intersection,
and along the study road for the various analysis scenarios.
The results of the intersection analyses show that without a northbound left turn lane in place at
the Winding Creek main (north) access point or the south access point, the northbound
approaches to both access points (shared left turn / through movements) are projected to operate
at a good LOS A with very minimal delays (0.6 seconds per vehicle or less) during the AM and
PM peak hours.
Halff also evaluated the South Carroll Avenue / Westmont Drive intersection and the two
proposed site access points along South Carroll Avenue assuming northbound left turn lanes
were provided at the two site access points. The build out year (2014) total volumes were
evaluated for this geometric scenario. The results of this analysis show that providing
northbound left turn lanes along South Carroll Avenue at the two proposed site access points
does not have any impact on the AM and PM peak hour operations at the South Carroll Avenue /
Westmont Drive intersection.
HALFF
Case No. Attachment C
ZA11 -061 Page 6
Winding Creek
South Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
Januarn 31, 2012
AVO 28610
It should be noted that the City of Southlake does not have a set of defined design criteria to
evaluate the need for left turn deceleration lanes at site driveways or minor street intersections.
TxDOT, in their Roadway Design Manual, does publish a "Guide for Left -Turn Lanes on Two -
Lane Highways." The TxDOT guide defines situations where left turn deceleration lanes should
be considered. It is Halffs opinion that the TxDOT guidelines should not be used to evaluate the
need for left turn deceleration lanes at the two proposed site access points, because the conditions
surrounding the Winding Creek development site do not meet the basic criteria outlined by
TxDOT.
Based on the results of the peak hour intersection analyses and a review of the development site
plan, Halff recommends the following:
• Install stop signs and stop bars on the eastbound approaches of both site access streets to
South Carroll Avenue.
• The City of Southlake should consider accelerating the constriction of the western half of
the road, in order to accommodate the vehicular demand currently using the road.
- ii- HALFF*
Case No. Attachment C
ZA11 -061 Page 7
13SOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
PROJECT NAME:
SPIN DISTRICT:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION:
N/A
Winding Creek
SPIN # 9
October 17, 2011 — 8:00 PM
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
Training Rooms 3 A/B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirteen (13)
• SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Ray Tremain (# 9)
• APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Paul Spain
• STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Cortez, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT: Dan iel Cortez, Planner 1 (817)748 -8070; dcortez @ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
• The property is located south of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) across from Oak Tree
Estates and Versailles subdivisions and north of The Lakes at La Paloma subdivision.
Development Details
• Terra Land Management Co. is proposing a 74 residential lot subdivision on
approximately 46.7 acres being called Winding Creek.
QUESTIONS /CONCERNS
• Are you putting any of Zena Rucker Road?
o Yes, up until the entrance to the subdivision.
• When do you think you'll start the subdivision?
u Hopefully zoning will be approved by February so at some point immediately
after.
• Will there be any attention to the wildlife and snakes getting displaced to other adjacent
properties?
o We haven't looked at that but there is a beaver we know we'll have to relocate.
• Will the existing trees on site be protected since they are so old?
We do have the record of protecting as many trees as possible and we will follow
the City's requirements to maximum extent possible, we will provide a tree
survey.
• 1 don't want this development to add to the people that come onto my property and
deface it.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA11 -061 Page 1
• What's the density?
Less than 1
• What builders have expressed interest?
We are still currently evaluating which builder will come in and build the
subdivision.
• Issues /Concerns — Lot size, orientation of garages, separation from La Paloma to the
proposed development, drainage, fence line adjacent to La Paloma. City image with this
important piece of property and quality of product.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The
report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes, rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City
staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as
summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly
encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA11 -061 Page 2
REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA11 -061 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 02/07/12
Project Name: Development Plan — Winding Creek
APPLICANT: Paul Spain
Terra land Management, Inc.
395 W. Northwest Parkway, Ste. 300
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 410 -9201
PLANNER: Curtis Young
Sage Group, Inc.
1130 N. Carroll Ave. Ste. 200
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 424 -2626
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
02/01/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8072.
1. Show the right of way dedication for the roundabout planned for the future intersection of Zena
Rucker Rd. and Plaza Dr. on all plans.
2. In the L.U.D. /Zoning section, change the existing zoning from "S -P -2" and "AG" to "AG" only.
3. Please clarify the language in the revised R -PUD regulations regarding minimum house size to
state that the minimum livable floor area is 3,500 square feet.
4. Please revise all plans that show fencing to match the fencing on the Development Plan
submitted January 11, 2012.
The applicant has agreed to construct the portion of Zena Rucker Rd. adjacent to the Winding
Creek development when the internal road within the development is extended to Zena Rucker
with Phase II of the development if that portion of Zena Rucker has not already been constructed
as part of the development of the properties to the north. Construction of the proposed eight (8)
foot multi -use trail will be required with the construction of Zena Rucker Rd.
Pedestrian access easements will be required in the locations of the trails and sidewalks where
they cross private property. The four (4) foot sidewalks are required to be located at least two feet
from the back of curb and only five (5) feet is shown between the curb and right of way on the
"Typical Section 40' R.O.W." Exhibit shown on the preliminary plat. Pedestrian access easements
for the trails should be wider than the proposed trail width to allow flexibility in the placement of the
trails.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -061 Page 1
Tree Conservation /Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
(817) 748 -8229
kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
The criteria for Council approval of a Tree Conservation Analysis in Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -
D, Section 7.2(b) is as follows:
b. For property sought to be zoned for the Doti 11town zoning district or a planned development zollii
district. including an S -P -1 Site Plan. S -P -2 Site PlaIl. TransitioI1. Rural Conser'ation. Planned UI . it
Development. or Employment Center zonnng district. the City Council shall consider the application
for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in coiijuunction v%-idi the corresponding development application
(as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoniing Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regardiIlg the application. The City Council shall
approve the Plan or Analysis if the Cowicil folds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
1. placement of building pads. parking areas. driveways. streets. and utility easements so as to
lnaxinlize the preservation of enviromnental features of the property including innature tree
stands. natural creeks and ponds. and significant grades:
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree corer preservation areas indicated on the Elnvlromllental
Resource Protection Map:
iii. maxiizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
fi the noise. Glare. and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maxinizes the preser-,-ation of existing trees. if any. adjoining a natural or man -made drainage
creek:
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along r ral roadways and other streets as
identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation: and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Orduiance.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -061 Page 2
Public Works /Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. CFM
Civil Engineer
(817) 748 -8101
sanderson @ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15'
minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
PLAT COMMENTS:
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or in the ROW.
All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or in the ROW.
The fire line shall be separate from the service lines.
One meter per service line.
All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Please review the drainage patterns in Block 4 of the Plat. There could be future lot -to -lot drainage
issues. A detailed grading plan submitted with the engineering plans needs to show how the drainage
is going to work without negative impacts from lot to lot.
2. Drainage Date Tables need a row for B -4.16
This property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction. (Structure 18)
The drainage from this development is generally to the south and southwest.
The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed
Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works
Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan
checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website.
A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
A Developer's Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -061 Page 3
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City
of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance
Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way.
Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
Fire Marshal Review
David Barnes
FireMarshal
(817) 748 -8233
dbarnes @ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and
alternate names as soon as possible.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay' basis. Fire apparatus access, if necessary, needs to be all
weather surface (asphalt or concrete) 24 feet wide and able to support fire apparatus.
2. Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (minimum of 75,000 Ibs GVW).
3. Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. (per
2006 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4 as amended and policy dated 05 -27 -93 and updated 07- 18 -97)
Dimension turn radii on site plan.
4. Streets that are to be dead -end until the next phase of construction need to be provided with an
approved turn - around for fire apparatus if the dead -end is more than 150 feet long.
5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads: Developments of one -or two family dwellings where the number of
dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with separate and approved fire apparatus access
roads and shall met the requirement of Section D104.3.
6. D104.3 Remoteness Where two access roads are required they shall be placed a distance apart
equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the
property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses.
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants are to have Hydra -Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper
outlet for five -inch diameter hose.
1. Hydrants are required at maximum spacing R -3 and U Occupancies 400 feet unsprinklered 600
feet sprinklered. All others 300 feet unsprinklered and 600 feet sprinklered. Hydrants are required
at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as
the hose would be laid.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -061 Page 4
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the
International Fire Code currently amended and adopted.
All commercial buildings are required to have Knox rapid entry system boxes installed. (per 2006
I.F.C. Sec. 506.1 as adopted) Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire
Marshal's Office. FDC connections must have a Knox Locking Cap.
Denotes informational comment.
General Informational Comments:
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected development plan, irrigation
plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This
may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water &
Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -061 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
WINDING CREEK
SPO # I Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreag Response
P
1.
Zimmer, Michael R
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
1.37
NR
2.
Stone, Jerri H Etvir Ted
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.54
NR
3.
Carlisle, Caroline Etvir James
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.56
NR
4.
Tsay, Bing Etux Nancy
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.53
NR
5.
Hollingsworth, Gary Etux Judy
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.62
NR
6.
Parks, Kyle C
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.53
NR
7.
Po -Yu Chuang & Wei Lu Chuang
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.58
NR
8.
Lakes La Paloma Res Assoc Inc
SF20A
Medium Density Residential
0.92
NR
9.
SI Oak Tree Est Homeownr Assn
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
3.26
U
10.
Ali, Zulfiqar Etux Samreen Ali
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.57
NR
11.
Hickman, Mark Etux Christine
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.48
NR
12.
Keeter, Neil P Etux Denise N
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
13.
Duyka, Samuel L Etux Sherri L
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.46
NR
14.
Kotter, Mark A Etux Mary J
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.69
O
15.
Regalado, Delmy A Etvir Ronald
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.60
NR
16.
Versailles Homeowner's Assoc
RPUD
Medium Density Residential
0.42
NR
17.
Keeter, Charles Etux Patricia
RPUD
Medium Density Residential
0.35
NR
18.
Bush, John R Jr
RPUD
Medium Density Residential
0.45
NR
19.
Wyman, Lee Grey Etux Kirsten W
RPUD
Medium Density Residential
0.52
NR
Case No.
ZA11 -061
Attachment F
Page 1
20.
Versailles Homeowners Assoc
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.80
NR
21.
Osterberg, Randall Etux Tobin
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.58
NR
22.
Romero, Richard Daniel
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.54
NR
23.
Thorn, Gregory M Etux Carol A
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.47
NR
24.
Smith, Jeffrey S Etux Sammie M
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.47
NR
25.
Jameson, David Etux Sandra
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.54
NR
26.
Winter, Robert H & Jennifer W
SF20B
Medium Density Residential
0.49
NR
27.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr
AG
Medium Density Residential, 100 -Year
Flood Plain
50.45
F*
28.
Vision SW Silverlake Llc
SP1
Office Commercial, Medium Density
Residential
4.22
NR
29.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr
AG
Office Commercial, Medium Density
Residential
4.24
F*
30.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan
AG
Medium Density Residential
1.51
F*
31.
Prade, C A Jr Est Etal
AG
Medium Density Residential
0.16
NR
32.
Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est
AG
Office Commercial, Medium Density
Residential
15.42
F
33.
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd
AG
Medium Density Residential
4.81
F
34.
Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est
AG
Medium Density Residential
17.41
F
35.
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd
AG
Medium Density Residential
1.74
F
36.
Prade, C A Jr Est Etal
AG
Medium Density Residential
13.00
NR
37.
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd
SP2
Office Commercial, Medium Density
Residential
16.34
F
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
* In Favor if conditions are met
Case No.
ZA11 -061
NR: No Response
Attachment F
Page 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES WITHIN 200'
Winding Creek
Notices Sent: Thirty -seven (37)
Responses Received: Five (5)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZA11 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd
8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110
Dallas Tx, 75225
A 899 4D01
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature:
Additional Signature:
Date: I
Date:
Printed Name(s): "��5' yy�y
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. fOtherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 4
Notification Response Form
ZA11 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM
Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est
PO Box 553
Blair Ok, 73526
A 899 4D 02
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the er(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above_
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: C. �Q_ Date: �nir
Additional Signature:
Date:
Printed Name(s): ?.
Must be property owners; whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise c act the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Z - d 8096£99089 Aw doz:90 11 90 09a
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 5
12/05/2011 14:22 8174212033 MARYKOTTER PAGE 01/01
Notification Response Form
ZA11 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6 :30 PM
Kotter, Mark A Etux Mary J
406 Edgemont Dr
Southlake Tx, 76092
n0717C 3 4
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE $TART OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of =opposed undecided about
(circle or underline cane)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
a F i r —
se 1741111' I kA I'-(.
__.- . _ .. I ... . .. -
00
4 L i • e� `5 �,4✓.
A_ju -.4 1 t ...`
Signature: Date:
ja
Additional Signature: Date.
Printed Name(s): _-
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are
at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 6
2!7112 Ci_southlakalxus Mail - FW; winding Crook Development
19 C" OF
SOUTHLAKE Richard Schell <rsche11 i@cl. south fake.tx.us>
FW: Winding Creek Development
1 message
Brandl Harris <bharris@ai.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM
To: Pilchard Schell <rschell @ci- southlake.tx.us>
— Original Message —
From: mark kotter [mailto
Sent: Monday, February 015 X112 635 PM
To: Mavorand-City ouncil @ci.southlake.tx.us
Cc: otehoa@googlegroups.com
Subject. Winding Creek Development
Dear Mayor and City Council Members;
I want to thank you for hearing the concerns of myself and my neighbors
regarding the proposed entrance to the Winding Creek Development. I also
thank you for requesting a traffic study regarding the impact of the
development on the traffic on South Carroll Avenue, I have not changed my
opinion or concern over the proposed location of the entrance to Winding
Greek and while I thank you for requesting the traffic study I do also
have some concerns over the study that I must address:
1. 1 did not hear any specifics as to what the study would actually
entail. If it is just a survey of additional traffic without addressing
specifics such as time of day or day of the week, I have to suggest that
the survey will not tell you much. The real concern is typically during
the weekdays at the following times: 06300830, 11:30- 1:00pm and from
5:00pm- 7:00pm. I suggest that these will be the same times that the
residents of Winding Creek will be using South Carroll as they depart and
arrive from work, school and other activities that are normal for
Southlake residents.
2. While I appreciate you asking the developer to have the traffic study
done, I am enough of a realist to be concerned that the study would be
done without bias. The devtafoper has already changed his statements
regarding the percentage of residents that would use the main entrance
from his first presentation at the Zoning committee meeting to what he
stated last month, He also made it clear at the last meeting that he did
not feel there would be an impact on traffic on South Carroll due to his
development.
With these Issues In mind, I would like to request from one of you the
necessary information that we would need to request the city put stop
signs on South Carroll where it intersects with our entrance to Oak Tree
Estates to help protect our residents,
Thank You
Mark Kotter
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 7
Mrs. Zena Rucker
650 S. Carroll Ave
Southlake, Texas 76092
8141481 -1185
December 8, 2011
Mr. Darrell Faglie, Chairman
Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: Prade Tract, ZA11 -061 and ZA11 -062
Dear Mr. Faglie,
I request that you please read this letter into the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of December 8, 2011 so as to clearly state my position towards cooperating with the
planned development of the Prade tract which abuts my property on my east property line.
As a long term owner and resident of my property I do not oppose the proposed development of
the Prade tract, but I request the development be executed in a manner so as to minimize its
intrusion to the safety, privacy and quiet enjoyment I currently have. To that end, I request an
eight foot masonry wall be constructed along the west property line of the Prade tract which
property line is a shared property line with my eastern property line.
In lieu of a masonry wall, I request that the developer construct an eight foot, board on board
wood fence with heavy gauge metal posts set in concrete four feet into the ground. I further
request that the fence pickets be six inches in width, that the fence be stained and that a finished
side of the fence be constructed facing my property. In order to preserve the safety and privacy of
my property I request that this fence be constructed by the developer at the outset of any on -site
development work on the Prade tract.
Recognizing the significant tree coverage along the property line I share with the Prade tract, and
hoping that this tree coverage will be preserved, I request the City designate the most westerly
twenty-five feet of the Prade tract a tree protection/mitigation area. If trees are removed from this
area, they should be mitigated pursuant to the City of Southlake's tree preservation ordinance.
Thank you for your consideration of my request.
Sincerely,
Zena Rucker
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 8
Notification Response Form
ZA11 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM
Rucker, Zena Sullivan
650 S Carroll Ave
Southlake Tx, 76092
A 899 3E
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
O
Signature: (/ .�_ Date: - Z. 1- 3
Additional Signature: � , �A Date: , L�
Printed Name(s): Z -r-: ly,A Z LI c-, Ke, r
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional): / % - 1 -7`
r/ - G /
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 9
Notification Response Form
ZA71 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr
650 S Carroll Ave
Southlake Tx, 76092
A 899 3D02 01
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
/ r
P�
r .
Signature: �i �� �- �L �� Date: -Y ' -//
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s): Z- If G ��
Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional): 9 - 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 10
Mrs. Zena Rucker
650 S. Carroll Ave.
Soutblake, Texas 76092
817/481 -1185
January 12, 2012
City Council
City of Southlake, Texas
Re: Drainage
Please accept this letter as an expression of my concern for the Winding Creek development
being considered on property previously owned by Chauncey Prade which property is located
adjacent and upstream from my property. 1 would like to have an answer as to how this new
development will address the existing drainage problems and how it will effect or burden my
property. I understand the ordinances of the City of Southlake do not allow a development to
increase the rate of flow of storm water in a post development condition from that which exists in
a pre - development condition. It appears from reviewing the preliminary drainage study
performed for the Winding Creek development that that condition is met. I further understand
though, that any new development must take into account existing conditions. As you may know,
it does not appear that the construction of the Lakes of La Paloma subdivision, located between
the Prade property and my property, was executed according to the engineering plans. I
specifically refer to the drainage and the capacity of the culverts beneath the driveway leading to
the most westerly lot in La Paloma. There currently exists a drainage problem in this area that
affects access to my house and appears to affect, or will affect with the new development, the
drive to the westerly La Paloma lot. Please refer to the third paragraph in the attached letter from
JBI Partners, Ina which better describes this problem.
If a new development is required to address existing conditions, is this requirement limited to the
last development to take place in a drainage basin, or the most down - stream development in a
drainage basin, or is it any development within a drainage basin? Obviously, I do not believe it
should be incumbent upon my property, or the development of my property, to address an
existing problem that might affect the entire drainage basin without some offset to the cost and
potential loss of developable property.
As I have stated before, I am not opposed to the proposed development though I may not support
it. I do, though, feel it is appropriate that the city and/or this new development investigate and
study the entire basin, not just the new development property and its upstream properties, to
determine how the overall drainage will be handled and the costs shared before resolution of the
drainage problems are left for only one property, mine.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
Zena Rucker
--°L JAN 1 3 2012
cc: TofOffigier, Esq.
OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 11
January 7, 2012
Ms. Zena Rucker
650 S. Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
16301 Quorum Drive
Suite 200 B
Addison, Texas 75001
T.972.248.76T6
F.972.248.1414
Re: Drainage Study for proposed Winding Creek Development (Prade property)
Southlake, Texas
Dear Ms. Rucker:
Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the drainage study for the proposed Winding
Creek development (Prade property) prepared by Deotte, Inc. on October 5, 2011. My
review is based on the results presented in the report. I did not verify, recalculate or
check the numerical data presented in the report, which would have taken a
tremendous amount of time. The report results look reasonable and the firm who
prepared the report is reputable, so for the purpose of my review, I assume the
numerical data presented is correct.
The report presents a comparison of the amount of stormwater (cfs — cubic feet per
second) leaving the south property line of Winding Creek development. Various
intensities of storm events were used - 2-year, 110-year and 100 -year. Deotte compares
the stormwater leaving the development using (1) the existing ground conditions, which
includes the existing southern pond with no formalized spillway or outfall structure as it
exists today versus (2) the developed runoff conditions of the property and a proposed
rework of the pond's outlet by incorporating a 3- barrel, 10 foot wide by 5 foot high box
culvert. Deotte assumes all land conditions upstream is developed for the comparison.
The results show a reduction of stormwater leaving the Prade property when the Prade
property is developed. The reduction amount ranges from 3% for the 2 -year storm
event to 15% for the 100 -year storm event. Intuitively, the results make sense because
introducing drainage structures into a drainage system, such as a culvert as Deotte has
proposed, typically backs up water and slows down the flood wave.
The report does not study the current conditions of the drainage way through La Paloma
addition and /or across your driveway and property. The DeOtte report shows the
detained 100 -year stormwater discharge leaving the Winding Creek development as
1,206 cfs. Several years ago, I reviewed the May 1996 engineering plans for La
Paloma which showed the 100 -year stormwater discharge used to design the La
Paloma drainage system as 660 efs. If you recall, the box culverts in La Paloma are
submerged and I believe they their capacity is much smaller than the original design
1V0IDS0riDab�Projecls�WCD0.7S� .satd'co:- jpmP7s. 7 —a Rwc — 20170107.d=
Case No.
ZA11 -061
www,jbipariners.com
Attachment F
Page 12
January 7, 2012
Ms. Zena Rucker
Page 2 of 2
condition of 660 cfs. Also, significant amounts of water run across your driveway which
make it impassable during some storm events. i believe DeOtte's flow of 1,206 cfs to
be representative of today's condition in the watershed, so issues across La Paloma
andyour property are potentially worse than originally suspected.
In conclusion, Deotte's study shows the development of the Winding Creek does not
increase stormwater flows downstream when compared to current watershed
conditions. However, the study does not address the downstream drainageway
conditions across La Paloma and your property. These conditions could influence the
results presented in DeOtte's report. In any event, I think this the City needs to be
aware of the potential issues and possibly further evaluate the situation.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me (972 - 738 - 0218).
Sincerely,
Jeff Miles, PE
JBI Partners, Inc.
TEF No. F-438
.........................:
JEFFREY P MILES
80253 , k.
NBID5031Dafa` Ptvjen3lW C'DDOS:a'ord`COrypm -�1s Zena Rucker- 20120707 docz
Case No.
ZA11 -061
Attachment F
Page 13
RECEIVED
To: Southlake City Council
From: Zena Rucker
650 S. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, Texas 76092
Date: January 24, 2012
JAN 252012
OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY
Pursuant to the City Council meeting of January 17 and previous agreements made by
the developer at the Planning and Zoning Commission, I am in agreement to withdraw
my objections to the Winding Creek development provided I first receive a satisfactory
response to the question of 660 vs. 1206 efs of drainage raised in my letter of January 24,
2012 to the City Council and secondly, the Winding Creek developer agreeing to the
following conditions:
1. Construct a wood fence along our common. property line which fence shall be
constructed at the time of initial development activity. The fence shall be
constructed using metal posts, the finished side shall face my property and the
face shall be cedar installed in a board on board style with cap. Maintenance
of the fence shall be the responsibility of the Winding Creek homeowners
association, not the individual lot owners.
2. Eliminate the most southwesterly lot within the proposed Winding Creek
Development creating a vacant, open space area north of the Winding Creek
south property line of approximately 200 feet;
3. Construct a paved access drive on a recorded access easement from the most
southwesterly street in Winding Creek to the Rucker driveway at the location
closest to Winding Creek. Maintenance of this drive and the gate noted below
will be the responsibility of the Winding Creek homeowners association;
4. Construct an access gage across the access drive described above at the
common property line between Winding Creek and Rucker. Use and control
of the access gate will be limited to Rucker.
5. Resolve the drainage over the existing Rucker drive by, at minimum,
constructing an upstream weir structure and installing adequate drain pipes
beneath the existing, or reconstructed, drive to cause or allow water from the
pond to flow directly into the existing creek and not over the driveway.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 14
Notification Response Form
ZA11 -061
Meeting Date: December 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM
SI Oak Tree Est Homeownr Assn
PO Box 93191
Southlake Tx, 76092
30717C 1 0
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to .(uhdecided about:
•
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position
0 u/U.
P , "I',-
Signature: - Date:
g
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s): �WV' I ( S
Must be property owner(s) whose nam(s) are printed at top.
Date:
contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 15
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES OUTSIDE 200'
(ALSO INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR ZA11 -062)
From: Craig Smith Cmaiitc ��
Sent: Tuesday, January 1T, - 201- 2:OS �
To: MayorCa ci.southlake.tx.us; arichardson @ci.soutlilake,bcus
Subject: Re: Winding Creek development proposal
Craig Smith
craig.smithMvedzon.ret
As a resident of Southlake, I am not opposed to the Winding Creek development. I think it would be a great asset
for the city. However, as a resident of Oak Tree Estates, I have major concems about the proposed main
entrance to Winding Creek and its impact on the traffic on South Carroll. We already have an issue
with increased traffic on South Carroll. It is already difficult for us to get in and out of our development.
I am very opposed to the current proposed main entrance for Winding Creek, as I think it would exacerbate the
traffic issues we have now. I think it would be much better if the Winding Creek entrance was lined up with the
main entrance to Oak Tree Estates. This would also seem to be the logical place for a traffic light if and when
South Carroll is widened as opposed to a light further north on toward 1709.
In looking at the developer's plans, I truly do not see how shifting the entrance would have a negative impact on
the overall functionality of the development. It would, however, greatly help the Oak Tree Estates residents as
they come and go.
I urge you to require the developer to alter their plans to accommodate this change.
Thank you,
Craig Smith
1303 Forest Hills Court
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 16
-- Original Message- -
From: Linda Kay [maiito•
Sent: Tuesday, January 1", :30 WU
To: Mayor (&ci.southlake.tx.us
Cc: adchardsonCa)ci.southiake.tx.us
Subject: Winding Creek development proposal
I am not opposed to the Winding Creek development, but I have major
concems about the traffic on Carroll Ave. I live in Oak Tree Estates and
we already have an issue with congestion on Carroll for us trying to get
in and out of our development. I am very opposed to the proposed main
entrance for Winding Creek, as I think it would add to the problem. I
think it would be much better if the Winding Creek entrance was lined up
with our entrance to Oak Tree Estates. This would also make for a great
place for a traffic light in the future when Carroll is widened.
I will not be able to attend the meting tonight, but hope you will
consider my opinions.
Thank you,
Linda Kay Smith
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 17
From: Bonnie Aughenbaugh [mail MIMW
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:05 PM
To: mayor ci.southlake.tx.us; arichardson ci.southlake,fx_.us
Subject: Oak Tree /Winding Creek Entrance
Dear Sir,
It has been brought to my attention that there is debate about where to locate the entrances to the proposed
Winding Creek subdivision I am not opposed to the neighborhood; I am actually very excited to have
neighbors across Carroll. My concerns are traffic and emergency response time. The area can be very
congested and difficult to pull in and out of The Westmont entrance into Oak Tree is the begim* of the
emergency services route to Cambridge, papa Valley, parts of Versailes and Oak Tree. If the master plan
is for Carroll to become a four lane road, I think it would make sense for Oak Tree and Winding Creek to
share an entrance and also a stoplight to assist with traffic during emergency situations to al ow emergency
response teams to arrive at their destination promptly. I am not able to attend the public hearing this evening,
but please consider the issues of trams and emergency response when voting on the development of the
proposed Winding Creek subdivision.
Thank you,
Bonnie Aughenbaugh
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 18
From iit���
Sent: Tuesday, January 17; 2012 3:'x"17`
To: Mayor2ci.southlake.tx.us arichardson (aci.southlake.tx.us markkotter(fterizon.net
Subject: Winding Creek
We agree with Mark Kotter's position on the main entrance to the new development (across
from the entrance to Oak Tree Estates) and locating the traffic light at this intersection.
It does not make sense to control the traffic into and out of Central Market's receiving
location at the expense making it even more difficult for OTE residents to get onto Carroll or
off of Carroll into the development
Please give this logic serious consideration.
Thank you.
Phil and GinnyCarkner
306 Lakeside Ct.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 19
-- Original Message-- -
From: Karla [mailtr
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 20 2 '4:
To: mayorc— Dsouthlake.tx.us arichardsonAci.s out hlake.tx.us
Subject: Winding Creek Development -Brief request to consider
Good City Council members and Mayor Terrell,
As a concerned Oak Tree Estates resident, I want to voice my concern
regarding traffic flow on Carroll and the upcoming housing development.
It has come to my attention that the proposed WC exit off Carroll is not
coinciding with Oak Tree exit. I believe that it would be in the best
interest of all concerned (Both City Traffic Dept. and Neighborhood
drivers) that you good folk consider moving the Winding Creek exit to
coincide with the Oak Tree exit off Carroll.
Reason being, a future intersection light could support heavy traffic flow
exiting both subdivisions. To date, this area N and S off Carroll and
Westmont toward Central Market is a hazard and ar y further traffic will
only increase the possibility of an accident - Via auto, cycles, and foot
trafficl
This area has a large population of children.. Please keep this plan
focused for all to benefit.
Thanks for your kind consideration.
Karla Cogbum
Eclectic- Maison Designs, LLC
Eclectic Construction Mgmt, LLC
Resident at:
1308 Westmont Ct
Southlake, Tx 76092
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 20
Front Jeff Fancher [mailto
Sent; Tuesday, January 17, :25 PM
To: mayorOci.southlake.bx.us markkotter(&verizon.net
Subject: Winding Creek Development
Mr. Terrell,
I was wrinting to express my concern around the proposed entrance and traffic light location for the Winding
Creek Development. It has come to my attention that the proposed main entrance is slated to be roughly 300 feet
south of the entrace to Oak Tree Estates. In addition, it sounds like a traffic light is going to be put in near the
service road entrance for Pier One and Central Market. That location for the subdivision entrace and traffic light
makes no sense. I would like to know it the council has required the developer to get a traffic study to determine
the optimum location. You would think that common sense would tell you to put the light and subdivision entrance
across from the Oak Tree Estates development to make the most efficient use of the light for all parties.
Congestion is pretty bad right now and the placement of the traffic light in the proposed location will make it even
worse. This really needs to be looked at in detail before any approvals are given.
I fear the council is just rubber stamping what the devioper has requested without stepping back and looking at
what makes sense. Please bring my concerns forward to the council.
Thanks,
Jeff Fancher
1308 Burgundy Ct
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 21
Forwarded messa ee
From:
Date: ue, an - 11 , 2b12 at R52 PM
Subject: Against Winding Creek entry—unless we get a light at Westmont and Carroll
To: adchardson (a)ci.southlake.tx.us mayorla ci.southlakeUms mark kotter < markkotterfterizon.net >
I am not a supporter of the current plan. As much as I would not like any traffic accidentally coming into
Westmont with the "collector theory"..I think something will need to be done.
I have waited once for 18 cars to pass Westmont going N on Carroll when I was trying to turn N on Carroll off of
Westmont. No gaps were to be had. Trying to go south on Carroll off of Westmont and crossing two lanes.. is
sometimes impossible. If the current entrance is going to happen ..then maybe a light at the Westmont / Carroll
intersection. Maybe not the best solution, but maybe the only one if Winding Creek entrance stays
Thanks
Scott Stalets
1316 Westmont Ct
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 22
Ffo [mailto 1
Sent: Tuesday, FebruaTV 07, 2012 11:03 AM
To: mayorandcitvcouncil (aci.Southlake.tx.us
Subject: Winding Creek
To Mayor and City Council Members
We cannot add much more to Mr. Kotter's comments below. As a decade plus resident of living on Westmont
Ct.. what he states below is accurate. It is becoming a game of chicken sometimes to turn off of Westmont on
to Carroll going north bound. if feeling really daring, sometimes I will actually navigate an entry point against
traffic flow in both directions and attempt to head southbound. Regarding the expressed concerns regarding the
traffic study-since the developer is funding this, I suggest the City mitigate any possible future liability concerns
and retain an unbiased third party to at least evaluate the results of the study.
Thanks
Scott and Valerie Stalets
Dear Mayor and City Council Members;
I want to thank you for hearing the concerns of myself and my neighbors regarding the proposed entrance to the
Winding Creek Development. I also thank you for requesting a traffic study regarding the impact of the
development on the traffic on South Carroll Avenue. I have not changed my opinion or concern over the proposed
location of the entrance to Winding Creek and while I thank you for requesting the traffic study I do also have
some concerns over the study that I must address:
1. 1 did not hear any specifics as to what the study would actually entail, If it is just a survey of additional traffic
without addressing specifics such as time of day or day of the week, I have to suggest that the survey will not tell
you much. The real concern is typically during the weekdays at the following times: 0630 -0830, 11:30- 1:00pm
and from 5:00pm- 7:00pm. I suggest that these will be the same times that the residents of Winding Creek will be
using South Carroll as they depart and arrive from work, school and other activities that are normal for Southlake
residents.
2. While I appreciate you asking the developer to have the traffic study done, I am enough of a realist to be
concerned that the study would be done without bias. The developer has already changed his statements
regarding the percentage residents that would use the main entrance from his first presentation at the Zoning
committee meeting to what he stated last month. He also made it clear at the last meeting that he did not feel
there would be an impact on traffic on South Carroll due to his development.
With these issues in mind, I would like to request from one of you the necessary information that we would need
to request the city put stop signs on South Carroll where it intersects with our entrance to Oak Tree Estates to
help protect our residents.
Thank You
Mark Kotter
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 23
front Gerald ZERM [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, January 17,
To: mavor0ci.southlake.tx.us
Cc: markkotter(a verizon.net
Subject: Winding Creek Development.
I am a rather new resident of Southlake, living here less than 2 years. I have had to do a little catch up and a self
guided tour of the local area where this proposed ( ?) development is located and how it might impact our area. I
reside in Oak Tree Estates at 1315 IGngs Brook Court. I must disagree with the location of the street (Zena Rucker
Road) and how it intersects Carroll Avenue. Should not this avenue meet Carroll at the same place of the
entrance to the Oak Tree development? Should it not be the same physical size of that entrance, le @ 4 lanes
wide so the flow in and out of the development is more orderly? If need be a traffic signal located there would
ensure a smoother flow of traffic. As proposed the Zena Rucker Road meets Carroll at the service driveway of the
shopping center with a signal light. Isn't that an impediment to a smoother flow of thru traffic on Carrol and the
flow of traffic into and out of the shopping center. In•the short time I have lived here, this area is easily
congested, the left hand turn from Carroll into the shopping center drive is poorly marked as many time drivers
making a left hand trun are actually attempting the turn from the thru traffic lane, not the turn lane. As Zena
Rucker Road is being extended from its present terminus just east of Byron Nelson Drive, more thru traffic will use
this path as a way to get to the Central Market Shopping Center, as an alternative to going out to 1709 ( Southlake
Blvd). I would also take issue that Carroll Avenue is not improved to a level to handle the increase in traffic needs
that this development will certainly bring. The residents of Oak Tree Estates deserve consideration in this matter.
Please forward this to the Council for there consideration on this matter.
Thank You,
Gerald A. Zerm
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 24
Fronx Um [mailtq
Sent: ues a ; ary , 1211:55
To: mayorandci councilCDci.southlake.tx.us
Cc: oaktreeestate@yahoo.com
Subject: Carroll Ave. traffic
Dear Mayor and City Council members,
As a long -time resident of Oak Tree Estates, I am finding it more difficult each day to exit my development on
Carroll and drive south due to increased traffic. I understand that the development across Carroll Ave. is going to
be developed into residential, so this will significantly add to the traffic. It would be nice to have a traffic light at
the entrance of our Oak Tree Estates, which could also be opposite their entrance to allow for us to move traffic,
or possibly a round -a -bout, there. i am emphatically opposed to a round - a-bout being where Zena Rucker will
extend into Carroll Ave. As you know when the Shops of Southlake was approved, we were promised by the City
Council (including Carolyn Morris) that the driveway would never be a through street and traffic would be very
limited to delivery trucks for the shops located there, as well as hours of their deliveries would be limited, as the
sign indicates(none between 10PM -6AM). Central Market has honored these promises and I expect you to, also.
Thank you for your time and service.
Regards,
Jane H. Cravens
304 Lakeside Ct.
L817) 329 -5929
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 25
— Original Message
From: Aaron Choate [rnaift
Sent: Tuesday, February 0 ,
To: MaayorandCityCouncilOci .southlake.tx.us
Cc: markkotterOverizon:net
Subject: Re: Winding Creek Development
I wish to echo the concerns stated in the forwarded message below. As one
of the original homeowners in Oak Tree Estates, 1 have seen tremendous
growth in the traffic on South Carroll in the nearly 15 years since we
moved in. I commend the city of Southlake on managing growth so well over
the years, and expect that this decision willpower reflect the same
thoughtful consideration we have seen in the past.
sincerely hope that the decision reached regarding this development
answers our needs for improvement in traffic conditions at the entrance to
Oak Tree Estates.
Thank You,
Aaron H. Choate
403 Wellington Court
Sent from my Phone
On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:35 PM, mark kotter wrote:
• Dear Mayor and City Council Members;
• I want to thank you for hearing the concerns of myself and my neighbors
regarding the proposed entrance to the Winding Creek Development. I also
thank you for requesting a traffic study regarding the Impact of the
development on the traffic on South Carroll Avenue. I have not changed my
opinion or concern over the proposed location of the entrance to Winding
Creek and while I thank you for requesting the traffic study I do also
have some concerns over the study that I must address:
> 1. 1 did not hear any specifics as to what the study would actually
entail. If it is just a survey of additional traffic without addressing
specifics such as time of day or day of the week, I have to suggest that
the survey will not tell you much. The real concem is typically during
the weekdays at the following times: 0630 -0830, 11:30- 1:00pm and from
5:00pm- 7:O0pm. I suggest that these will be the same times that the
residents of Winding Creek will be using South Carroll as they depart and
arrive from work, school and other activities that are normal for
Southlake residents.
> 2. While I appreciate you asking the developer to have the traffic
study done, I am enough of a realist to be concerned that the study would
be done without bias. The developer has already changed his statements
regarding the percentage of residents that would use the main entrance
from his first presentation at the Zoning committee meeting to what he
stated last month. He also made it clear at the last meeting that he did
not feel there would be an impact on traffic on South Carroll due to his
development.
> With these issues in mind, I would like to request from one of you the
necessary information that we would need to request the city put stop
signs on South Carroll where it intersects with our entrance to Oak Tree
Estates to help protect our residents.
• Thank You
• Mark Kotter
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11 -061 Page 26
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480 -614
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 4,
4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F AND PORTIONS OF TRACTS 4D AND 4G,
OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 46.65 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG"
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R -PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B ", SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 2
under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 3
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tracts 4, 4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F and portions of Tracts 4D and 4G,
Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 4
Texas, being approximately 46.65 acres, and more fully and completely described in
Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B ", and subject to the following conditions:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 5
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract
or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,
under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until
final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 6
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 St reading the 3rd day of January, 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2 nd reading the day of , 2012.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 7
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 8
EXHIBIT "A"
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 9
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for approved Development Plan
Case No. Attachment G
ZA11 -061 Page 10