Item 6B
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 11, 2012
CASE NO:ZA11-062
PROJECT:RevisedPreliminary Plat for Winding Creek
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
Terra Land Management is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for Winding Creek
on property described as Tracts 4, 4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F and portions of Tracts 4D and
4G, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas and currently addressed as 400, 430, 450, 480, 500 and 540, S. Carroll Ave.
and 1001 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: AG – Agricultural
District. Requested Zoning: R-PUD – Residential Planned Unit Development District.
SPIN Neighborhood # 7.
REQUEST:
Terra Land Management is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for Winding Creek
to develop 74 residential lots on approximately 46.65 acres.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a preliminary plat
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Report dated October 17, 2011
(E) Revised Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated January 10, 2012
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council Members Only
(G) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (748-8067)
Richard Schell (748-8602)
Case No.
ZA11-062
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/
APPLICANT:
Terra Land Management, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION:
Generally located south of E. Southlake Blvd. and west of S. Carroll Ave. at
400, 430, 450, 480, 500 and 540, S. Carroll Ave. and 1001 E. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Tracts 4, 4D01, 4E, 4E01, 4F and portions of Tracts 4D and 4G, Obediah W.
Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“AG Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION:
December 8, 2011;Approved (5-0), subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2
dated December 1, 2011.
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN:
The Pathways Master Plan shows a planned eight (8) foot plus, multi-use trail
along the west side of S. Carroll Ave. and a proposed eight (8) foot, multi-use
trail along the future extension of Zena Rucker Rd. from Byron Nelson Parkway
to S. Carroll Ave. The eight (8) foot multi-use trail along the west side of S.
Carroll Ave. is shown on the proposed development plan. The proposed eight
(8) foot trail along the future Zena Rucker Rd. will be provided at the time that
portion of the road is constructed. An eight (8) foot plus, multi-use trail is also
proposed on the Pathways Plan from S. Carroll Ave. through the property to
connect with the Zena Rucker property to the west. A six (6) foot concrete trail
is shown on the plan. An on-street bikeway is planned on S. Carroll Ave.
STAFF COMMENTS:
For additional background information, please see the staff report for the
zoning and development plan (ZA11-061). Revised Plat Review Summary
No. 2, dated January 10, 2012 is attached.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA11-062 Page 1
Case No. Attachment B
ZA11-062 Page 1
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA11-062 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA11-062 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA11-062 Page 2
REVISED PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA11-062Two01/10/12
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Preliminary Plat
Project Name: – Winding Creek
APPLICANT: Paul Spain PLANNER: Curtis Young
Terra land Management, Inc. Sage Group, Inc.
395 W. Northwest Parkway, Ste. 300 1130 N. Carroll Ave. Ste. 200
Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 410-9201 Phone: (817) 424-2626
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
11/28/11 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Please provide pedestrian access easements in the locations of the trails and sidewalks where
they cross private property. The four (4) foot sidewalks are required to be located at least two feet
from the back of curb and only five (5) feet is shown between the curb and right of way on the
“Typical Section 40’ R.O.W.” Exhibit shown on the preliminary plat. Provide pedestrian access
easements for the trails that are wider than the proposed trail width to allow flexibility in the
placement of the trails.
2. Provide adequate right of way for the roundabout planned for the future intersection of Zena
Rucker Rd. and Plaza Dr.
3. In the L.U.D./Zoning section, change the existing zoning from “S-P-2” and “AG” to “AG” only.
* The applicant has agreed to construct the portion of Zena Rucker Rd. adjacent to the Winding
Creek development when the internal road within the development is extended to Zena Rucker
with Phase II of the development if that portion of Zena Rucker has not already been constructed
as part of the development of the properties to the north. Construction of the proposed eight (8)
foot multi-use trail will be required with the construction of Zena Rucker Rd.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11-062 Page 1
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
(817) 748-8229
kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
*
As required, a Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted with the Preliminary Plat. The criteria for
Council approval in Section 7.2(b) is as follows:
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11-062 Page 2
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. CFM
Civil Engineer
(817) 748-8101
sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
PLAT COMMENTS:
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or in the ROW.
* All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or in the ROW.
* The fire line shall be separate from the service lines.
* One meter per service line.
* All sewer lines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Please review the drainage patterns in Block 4 of the Plat. There could be future lot-to-lot drainage
issues. A detailed grading plan submitted with the engineering plans needs to show how the drainage
is going to work without negative impacts from lot to lot.
* This property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction. (Structure 18)
* The drainage from this development is generally to the south and southwest.
* The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22” X 34” full size sheets) and a completed
Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works
Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan
checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer’s Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11-062 Page 3
* A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City
of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance
Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
Fire Marshal Review
David Barnes
FireMarshal
(817) 748-8233
dbarnes@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
* Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and
alternate names as soon as possible.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
1. Fire apparatus access needs to be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis. Fire apparatus access, if necessary, needs to be all
weather surface (asphalt or concrete) 24 feet wide and able to support fire apparatus.
2. Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (minimum of 75,000 lbs GVW).
3. Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. (per
2006 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4 as amended and policy dated 05-27-93 and updated 07-18-97)
Dimension turn radii on site plan.
4. Streets that are to be dead-end until the next phase of construction need to be provided with an
approved turn-around for fire apparatus if the dead-end is more than 150 feet long.
5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads: Developments of one-or two family dwellings where the number of
dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with separate and approved fire apparatus access
roads and shall met the requirement of Section D104.3.
6. D104.3 Remoteness Where two access roads are required they shall be placed a distance apart
equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the
property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses.
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants are to have Hydra-Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper
outlet for five-inch diameter hose.
1. Hydrants are required at maximum spacing R-3 and U Occupancies 400 feet unsprinklered 600
feet sprinklered. All others 300 feet unsprinklered and 600 feet sprinklered. Hydrants are required
at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as
the hose would be laid.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11-062 Page 4
International Fire Code currently amended and adopted.
* All commercial buildings are required to have Knox rapid entry system boxes installed. (per 2006
I.F.C. Sec. 506.1 as adopted) Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire
Marshal’s Office. FDC connections must have a Knox Locking Cap.
* Denotes informational comment.
General Informational Comments:
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected development plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11-062 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
WINDING CREEK
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
Zimmer, Michael R SF20A Medium Density Residential 1.37
1. NR
Stone, Jerri H Etvir Ted SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.54
2. NR
Carlisle, Caroline Etvir James SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.56
3. NR
Tsay, Bing Etux Nancy SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.53
4. NR
Hollingsworth, Gary Etux Judy SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.62
5. NR
Parks, Kyle C SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.53
6. NR
Po-Yu Chuang & Wei Lu Chuang SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.58
7. NR
Lakes La Paloma Res Assoc Inc SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.92
8. NR
Sl Oak Tree Est Homeownr
9. O
Assn SF20B Medium Density Residential 3.26
Ali, Zulfiqar Etux Samreen Ali SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.57
10. NR
Hickman, Mark Etux Christine SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.48
11. NR
Keeter, Neil P Etux Denise N SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.46
12. NR
Duyka, Samuel L Etux Sherri L SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.46
13. NR
Kotter, Mark A Etux Mary J SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.69
14. NR
Regalado, Delmy A Etvir Ronald SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.60
15. NR
Versailles Homeowner's Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.42
16. NR
Keeter, Charles Etux Patricia RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.35
17. NR
Bush, John R Jr RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.45
18. NR
Wyman, Lee Grey Etux Kirsten RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.52
19. NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 1
W
Versailles Homeowners Assoc SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.80
20. NR
Osterberg, Randall Etux Tobin SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.58
21. NR
Romero, Richard Daniel SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.54
22. NR
Thorn, Gregory M Etux Carol A SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.47
23. NR
Smith, Jeffrey S Etux Sammie M SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.47
24. NR
Jameson, David Etux Sandra SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.54
25. NR
Winter, Robert H & Jennifer W SF20B Medium Density Residential 0.49
26. NR
Medium Density Residential, 100-Year Flood
27. NR
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG Plain 50.45
Office Commercial, Medium Density
28. O
Vision SW Silverlake Llc SP1 Residential 4.22
Office Commercial, Medium Density
29. NR
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG Residential 4.24
Rucker, Zena Sullivan AG Medium Density Residential 1.51
30. NR
Prade, C A Jr Est Etal AG Medium Density Residential 0.16
31. F
Office Commercial, Medium Density
32. NR
Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est AG Residential 15.42
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd AG Medium Density Residential 4.81
33. NR
Prade, C A Jr Est & Anita Est AG Medium Density Residential 17.41
34. NR
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd AG Medium Density Residential 1.74
35. NR
Prade, C A Jr Est Etal AG Medium Density Residential 13.00
36. F
Office Commercial, Medium Density
37. NR
Rcp Southlake Blvd #2, Ltd SP2 Residential 16.34
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES
Winding Creek
Notices Sent:
Thirty-seven (37)
Responses Received:
Three (3) – Attached
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 4
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 5
Case No. Attachment F
ZA11-062 Page 6