1996-12-19 P&Z Meeting City of Southlake, Texas
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 19,1996
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall
WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA:
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of December
5, 1996.
3. Administrative Comments.
4. Consider: ZA 96 -146, SITE PLAN FOR MESCO ADDITION, LOT 5, on property legally
described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mesco Addition, and being approximately 1.190 acres
situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. Location: Northwest
corner of State Highway 114 and Kimball Avenue. Current Zoning: "SP -2"
Generalized Site Plan District to include "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District
uses. Applicant: Strode Property Company. Owner: Anderson Industries, Inc. SPIN
Neighborhood #6.
Public Hearing.
5. Consider: ZA 96 -147, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED BEER
FOR OFF - PREMISE CONSUMPTION), on property legally described as Lot 5,
Block 1, Mesco Addition, and being approximately 1.190 acres situated in the
Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. Location: Northwest corner of State
Highway 114 and Kimball Avenue. Current Zoning: "SP -2" Generalized Site Plan
District to include "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. Applicant: Strode
Property Company. Owner: Anderson Industries, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #6.
Public Hearing.
6. Consider: ZA 96 -148, SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY BANK, on property legally described as
Lot 1E1, W. E. Mayfield Addition, and being approximately 0.892 acres situated in
the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and the Thomas Easter Survey,
Abstract No. 474. Location: 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). on the north
side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), and approximately 280' east of Bluebonnet
Drive. Current Zoning: "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner and
Applicant: Liberty Bank. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
Public Hearing.
City of Southlake, Texas
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA
DECEMBER 19, 1996
PAGE 2
7. Consider: ZA 96 -150, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR THE CHILDREN'S
COURTYARD, on property described as approximately 3.207 acres situated in the
R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being Tracts 1A and 1A1. Location:
South side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 200' west of the
intersection of Waterford Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M.1709). Current
Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SP -1" Detailed Site Plan
District with varied "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. Applicant:
Realtex Ventures, Inc. Owners: Lila M. Pinson (Tract 1A) and Lloyd Martinson
(Tract 1A1). SPIN Neighborhood #13.
Public Hearing.
8. Consider: ORDINANCE NO. 480 -W, REVISIONS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
480, pertaining to telecommunication facilities, including towers, antennas, satellite
dishes, and ancillary structures and the definition of kennel.
Public Hearing.
9. Consider: ORDINANCE NO. 480 -X, REVISIONS TO SECTION 30, "PUD" PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OF THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480,
pertaining to residential density.
Public Hearing.
10. Consider: ZA 96 -151, SITE PLAN OF THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON, PHASE I, being
proposed as Lot 3, Block 60, Timarron Addition, Phase 5, and being legally
described as being a portion of Lots 1C2 and Lot 1B2, Block 1, Dilg Place, and being
approximately 3.50 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
899. Location: South side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast
corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway.
Current Zoning: "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1,
Timarron and permitting "C -2" Local Retail uses on this site. Applicant: Venus
(Drews) Partner V, L.P. Owner: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood
#9.
Public Hearing.
11. Consider: ZA 96 -152, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE CHURCH
OF CHRIST, on property being described as Lot 1, Brock Addition, an Addition to
the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Volume 388 -44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the
portion awarded to the State of Texas by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No.
153 - 127796 -90, a certified copy of which is recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121,
Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Also part of this consideration is a Revised
Concept Plan on property being described as Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition,
an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot 1,
Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to the plat recorded in Volume 388 -44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant
• City of Southlake, Texas
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA
DECEMBER 19, 1996
PAGE 3
County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to the State of Texas by Agreed
Judgement entered in Cause No. 153 - 127796 -90, a certified copy of which is
recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
Location: Southwest corner of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake
Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District (Lot
1, Brock Addition) and "CS" Community Service District (Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No.
18 Addition). Requested Zoning: "CS" Community Service District (Lot 1, Brock
Addition). Applicant: FDS International. Owners: Jimmie O. and Judith A.
Hettinger (Lot 1, Brock Addition) and Southlake Church of Christ (Lot 3R, J. G.
Allen No. 18 Addition). SPIN Neighborhood #15.
Public Hearing.
12. Consider: ZA 96 -71, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE) GREAT
OUTDOOR LANDSCAPE, being legally described as Lot 3, Block A, Hart
Industrial Park, and being approximately 0.998 acres situated in the John N. Gibson
Survey, Abstract No. 591. Location: North side of Hart Court, approximately 225'
east of the intersection of Brumlow Avenue and Hart Court. Current Zoning: "I -1"
Light Industrial District. Owner: Joseph Hart. Applicants: Scott and Carol Malone.
SPIN Neighborhood #7.
Public Hearing.
13. Consider: ZA 96 -155, REZONING FOR CALLICOTT /RHODES FARM, on property
described as being approximately 1.004 acres, and being Tract 1B5C in the L. H.
Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300. Location: Approximately 810' south of the
intersection of East Dove Street and Ridgecrest Drive. Current Zoning: "AG"
Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF -1A" Single Family Residential
District. Applicant: Forshey Consulting Services, Inc. Owners: Cari C. Rhodes and
Kevin Rhodes. SPIN Neighborhood #4.
Public Hearing.
14. Consider: ZA 96 -154, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CALLICOTT /RHODES FARM, on
property described as being approximately 12.98 acres, being Tracts 1B3 and 1B3C
in the L. H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300. Location: South side of East Dove
Street at the intersection of East Dove Street and Ridgecrest Drive. Current Zoning:
"SF -1A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Forshey Consulting
Services, Inc. Owners: Cari Rhodes, Kevin Rhodes, and Sonja Callicott. SPIN
Neighborhood #4.
Public Hearing.
15. Consider: ZA 96 -156, REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TIMARRON ADDITION,
PHASE 5, being 23.82 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
899, and being Tract 2A5, portions of Tracts 2A3, 2B and 5D, and portions of Lots
1 and 2 of Spring Creek Acres. The plat proposes 58 residential lots and 2 common
areas. Location: West side of the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway, approximately
450' north of the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and Lilac Lane. Current
City of Southlake, Texas
• REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA
DECEMBER 19, 1996
PAGE 4
Zoning: "R- P.U.D. No. 1" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner and
Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhoods #9 & #10.
Public Hearing.
16. Consider: ZA 96 -157, SITE PLAN OF TIMARRON NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NUMBER
2, being Lot 30, Block 28 of the approved Final Plat of Village F, and being
approximately 3.471 acres situated in the O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 and
being a portion of Tract 2C 1 A. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of
Byron Nelson Parkway and the proposed Inwood Drive. Current Zoning: "R- P.U.D.
No. 1" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner and Applicant: Timarron
Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #10.
Public Hearing.
17. Consider: MEETING ADJOURNMENT.
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667
North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, December 13, 1996 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to
the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551.
O t
SO U T �i<<����
Sandra L. LeGrand P-
City Secretary
**
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary
48 hours in advance at 481 -5581, extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
L: \WP- FILES \MTG\AGN\ 1996 \12- 19 -96. WPD
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING
December 19, 1996
1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright, Vice - Chairman Rex Potter; Members: Ann
2 Creighton, Debra Edmondson, James Murphy, Dona Schroetke, and Lanny Tate
3
4 COMMISSION ABSENT: None
5
6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineer Ron Harper, Planner Tom Elgin, Planner Dennis Killough,
7 and Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell
8
9 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:10 p.m.
10
11 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
12 Chairman Wright opened discussion of the minutes of the December 5, 1996, Regular Planning and
13 Zoning Commission Meeting.
14
15 Motion was made to approve the minutes of the December 5, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning
16 Commission Meeting, subject to the changes discussed in the work session.
17
1 8 Motion: Creighton
Second: Potter
20 Ayes: Schroetke, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton
21 Nays: None
22 Abstain: Tate, Murphy
23 Approved: 5 -0 -2
24 Motion carried.
25
26 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #25)
27
28 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS:
29 There were no administrative comments from city staff.
30
31 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #31)
32
33 AGENDA ITEM #8, ORDINANCE NO. 480 -W, REVISIONS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
34 NO. 480, AND
35 AGENDA ITEM #9, ORDINANCE NO. 480-X, REVISIONS TO SECTION 30, "PUD" PLANNED
36 UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OF THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480:
37 Motion was made to table Ordinance No. 480 -W and Ordinance No. 480 -X and to continue the
38 Public Hearing to the January 9, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
39
\ Motion: Potter
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 1 of 15
1 Second: Tate
Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
3 Nays: None
4 Approved: 7 -0
5 Motion carried.
6
7 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #48)
8
9 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA96 -146, SITE PLAN FOR MESCO ADDITION, LOT 5:
10 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Site Plan on
11 property legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mesco Addition, and being approximately 1.190 acres
12 situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The property is located on the northwest
13 corner of State Highway 114 and Kimball Avenue. The current zoning is "SP -2" Generalized Site
14 Plan District to include "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. The Land Use Category is
15 Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local
16 and regional needs). The Corridor Recommendation is Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C -1,
17 C -2, C -3 and B -1 districts). The applicant is Strode Property Company. The owner is Anderson
18 Industries, Inc. The property is in SPIN Neighborhood #6. Five (5) written notices were sent to
19 property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received.
20
21 Charles Hodges, Hodges & Associates, 13642 Omega, Dallas, Texas, presented this item to the
Commission. He agreed to comply with all Staff Comments with the exception of the articulation
calculations as discussed in the work session. He stated that the facility was reduced to 4,619 square
24 feet. He also agreed to the sharpening and modification of the northwest driveway.
25
26 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Hodges what color of brick he intends to use. He stated that
27 there are actually three (3) different colors they intend to use. The base brick is dark red which will
28 be used along the lower portion of the building. The lightest shade of brick will be used as a trim
29 band to divide the base brick from the peach brick. Commissioner Edmondson also asked the color
30 of the awnings. Mr. Hodges stated that he does not know that until they determine who the food user
31 will be. He stated that they normally use burgundy, forest green, or navy for the color of their
32 awnings. Commissioner Edmondson asked if there will be brick on the columns, and Mr. Hodges
33 stated that the columns will be bricked in the same pattern as the building.
34
35 Commissioner Edmondson commented that the actual building square footage will be 4,619 square
36 feet as opposed to 5,325 square feet shown on the site plan which was reviewed by staff.
37
38 Vice - Chairman Potter asked which Site Plan the Commission will take action on tonight: the Site
39 Plan reviewed by staff or the Site Plan given to the Commission in the work session. Chairman
40 Wright responded by saying they had the ability to choose which one they wanted to.
41
42 Vice - Chairman Potter clarified with Mr. Hodges that he does intend to add more curvature to the
43 northwest section of the driveway as discussed in the work session, and Mr. Hodges stated that he
agrees to make the changes.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 2 of 15
1 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Hodges to clarify what signage he intend to use. He stated that
there will be an identification sign for the Texas Petro retail store, a sign for the food tenant, and
3 signs on the canopy for the user (e.g., Texaco, Chevron) which are generally on three (3) sides of
4 the canopy.
5
6 Commissioner Schroetke wanted the applicant to be aware that it is a requirement to screen all roof-
7 mounted equipment.
8
9 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Hodges if there will be solid metal doors on the dumpster, and Mr.
10 Hodges said yes.
11
12 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
13 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
14
15 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -146, Site Plan for Mesco Addition, Lot 5, subject to Site Plan
16 Review Summary No. 1, dated November 1, 1996, incorporating the Site Plan provided to the
17 Commission in work session which modifies the building to be 4,619 square feet; modifying the
18 west driveway to show more curvature to the east; and adjusting the dumpster appropriately to allow
19 for access.
20
21 Motion: Potter
72 Second: Murphy
Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
24 Nays: None
25 Approved: 7 -0
26 Motion carried.
27
28 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #384)
29
30 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA96 -147. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED
31 BEER FOR OFF - PREMISE CONSUMPTION):
32 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Specific Use
33 Permit (for the sale of packaged beer for off - premise consumption) on property legally described as
34 Lot 5, Block 1, Mesco Addition, and being approximately 1.190 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan
35 Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The property is located on the northwest corner of State Highway 114
36 and Kimball Avenue. The current zoning is "SP -2" Generalized Site Plan District to include "C -2"
37 Local Retail Commercial District uses. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use (may include office
38 buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs). The
39 Corridor Recommendation is Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C -1, C -2, C -3 and B -1 districts).
40 The applicant is Strode Property Company. The owner is Anderson Industries, Inc. The property
41 is in SPIN Neighborhood #6. Five (5) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'
42 notification area, and no responses have been received.
43
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 3 of 15
1 Charles Hodges, Hodges & Associates, 13642 Omega, Dallas, Texas, presented this item to the
Commission.
3
4 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
5 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
6
7 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -147, Specific Use Permit, subject to Site Plan Review Summary
8 No. 1, November 1, 1996, incorporating the Site Plan provided to the Commission in work session
9 which modifies the building to be 4,619 square feet; modifying the west driveway to show more
10 curvature to the east; and adjusting the dumpster appropriately to allow for access.
11
12 Motion: Murphy
13 Second: Tate
14 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
15 Nays: None
16 Approved: 7 -0
17 Motion carried.
18
19 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #489)
20
21 AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA96 -148, SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY BANK:
22 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Site Plan on
property legally described as Lot 1E1, W. E. Mayfield Addition, and being approximately 0.892
24 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and the Thomas Easter Survey,
25 Abstract No. 474. The property is located at 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), on the north
26 side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), and approximately 280' east of Bluebonnet Drive. The
27 current zoning is "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use
28 (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional
29 needs). The Corridor Recommendation is Village Center. The owner and applicant is Liberty Bank.
30 The property is in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners
31 within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor.
32
33 Lee Hertel, Senior Vice President of Liberty Bank, 5801 Davis Boulevard, North Richland Hills,
34 Texas, presented this item to the Commission. Mr. Hertel referred to his Contractor, David Ritz,
35 regarding exceptions to the Site Plan Review Summary. Mr. Ritz asked for an exception to Item
36 #5C regarding the width of the fire lane and allowing for it to be 20' instead of 24'. He agreed to
37 make the exception on the fire lane subject to the Fire Marshal's approval. Mr. Ritz also asked for
38 an exception to the articulation requirements on the west side of the building because there is a
39 canopy on that side.
40
41 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Ritz if he would agree to place a metal gate on the dumpsters, and
42 Mr. Ritz said he would.
43
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 4 of 15
1 Commissioner Tate asked Planner Dennis Killough what he thought about the 20' fire lane. Mr.
Killough stated that as long as the plan was approved subject to the Fire Marshal's approval, he
3 would feel comfortable.
4
5 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
6
7 Harley Eaton, 2550 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, asked if there will be a fence or
8 barrier along the east side of this property. Mr. Easton also asked if the road which runs parallel to
9 Southlake Boulevard will end at the east property line. Chairman Wright stated that it would end
10 at the east property line until the property to the east is developed. Mr. Killough stated that a 10'
11 Type B bufferyard is required on the east property line, but a fence will not be required.
12
13 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
14
15 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -148, Site Plan for Liberty Bank, subject to Site Plan Review
16 Summary No. 1, dated November 15, 1996, stipulating that Item #5C will be subject to the Fire
17 Marshal's approval; modifying Item #9 to be a solid, metal gate; and accepting the plan as shown
18 on the articulation requirements.
19
20 Motion: Potter
21 Second: Murphy
7 2 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
Nays: None
24 Approved: 7 -0
25 Motion carried.
26
27 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #907)
28
29 AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA96 -150, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR THE CHILDREN'S
30 COURTYARD:
31 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and
32 Site Plan on property described as approximately 3.207 acres situated in the R. J. Paden Survey,
33 Abstract No. 1255, and being Tracts 1A and 1A1. The property is located on the south side of
34 Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 200' west of the intersection of Waterford
35 Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M.1709). The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The
36 requested zoning is "SP -1" Detailed Site Plan District with varied "C -2" Local Retail Commercial
37 District uses. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential (may include limited low
38 intensity office and/or retail uses). The Corridor Recommendation is Residential (any Single Family
39 Districts). The applicant is Realtex Ventures, Inc. The owners is Lila M. Pinson (Tract 1A) and
40 Lloyd Martinson (Tract 1A1). The property is in SPIN Neighborhood #13. Thirteen (13) written
41 notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and six (6) responses were
42 received which were all opposed. Five (5) letters outside the 200' notification area were received
43 in which three (3) were in favor, and two (2) were opposed.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 5 of 15
1 Mr. Elgin also pointed out to the Commission that City staff received a Traffic Impact Analysis on
2 this site and that the engineer is available tonight to answer any questions.
3
4 Carl Greer, Realtex Ventures, Inc., 2201 N. Collins Street, Suite 354, Arlington, Texas, presented
5 this item to the Commission. He stated that they will have over 20,000 square feet in buildable area
6 and will have one (1) child per every sixty -six square feet. He also stated that every teacher in this
7 facility will be required to have a degree in child education. They will have one (1) teacher for every
8 four (4) babies and one (1) teacher for every twelve (12) children over four (4) years old. The
9 number of required teachers gradually decreases as the children are older. Mr. Greer stated that he
10 feels this use is a good transition from the high school to the residential. He said that the buildings
11 will look like houses which will be compatible with the surrounding properties. Referring to their
12 Site Plan, Mr. Greer stated that they intentionally placed the northern-most building as far to the east
13 as possible so that the playground for that building could be buffered from the residential properties
14 on the east. The southern-most building will be used for after - school children. He stated that after
15 meeting with surrounding property owners, he agreed to additional plantings of bushes and trees
16 around the south and east property lines to help buffer the houses from noise. Their hours of
17 operation will be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. He stated that there is a traffic engineer present to
18 discuss the details of the Traffic Impact Analysis. Mr. Greer stated that although they have the
19 capacity for 306 students, 154 of those students will be transported to the facility via buses or vans
20 which will alleviate some of the traffic.
21
?2 Mr. Greer asked for an exception to Site Plan Review Summary Item #3B which requires a
minimum driveway spacing from a R.O.W. intersection to be 500'; they only have approximately
24 200'. Mr. Greer stated that they placed the driveway in the most appropriate location possible and
25 cannot meet this requirement.
26
27 Commissioner Creighton commented that the 154 students mentioned earlier who would be
28 transported to the facility via bus or van would still have to be picked up in the evening by individual
29 vehicles.
30
31 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Greer the age of the oldest child accepted at this facility, and
32 he stated that the age limit is twelve (12) years old. Commissioner Edmondson asked to hear more
33 details regarding the traffic study. Mr. Greer referred to his traffic engineer, James Chin.
34
35 James Chin, of DeShazo, Tang & Associates, 400 S. Houston, Suite 330, Dallas, Texas, stated that
36 according to their study it takes approximately twenty -two (22) seconds to make a left-hand turn
37 from Southlake Boulevard into this site during peak hours. Mr. Chin also stated that it takes
38 approximately thirty (30) seconds to make a left -hand turn onto Southlake Boulevard from this site
39 during peak hours.
40
41 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Chin how he arrived at the above figures. Mr. Chin stated that
42 the above figures are the result of a computer - generated model.
43
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 6 of 15
1 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Greer why he is asking for a variance to the throat depth, and
2 he stated that he will change that request and comply with the 75' throat depth requirement. Mr.
3 Greer also stated that City staff had mentioned that they would like a dual access driveway and that
4 he is willing to comply with their request.
5
6 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
7
8 Bob Couch, 2535 Union Church Road, Southlake, Texas, said that he is a broker involved with this
9 project. He feels that the use requested is ideal for this site. He feels that this day care center would
10 be of great service to the City of Southlake.
11
12 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
13
14 Commissioner Edmondson stated that she cannot support this application due to the extreme increase
15 in traffic that this project would bring to an already congested area. Commissioner Edmondson also
16 stated that she does not agree with the traffic engineer's statement that it would take approximately
17 twenty -two (22) seconds to make a left -hand turn onto Southlake Boulevard from this site during
18 peak hours; she feels it would actually take from two (2) to four (4) minutes.
19
20 Planner Tom Elgin stated that the traffic engineer, Larry Hoffman, recommended that the driveway
21 be moved to the west side of the property to allow room for additional stacking in the left in turn
�.2 lane.
24 Commissioner Creighton asked the applicant where the playground for the after - school building will
25 be located.
26
27 Jim Mills, President of Realtex Ventures, Inc., 1825 Wimbeldon, Arlington, Texas, pointed out the
28 playground which is located to the south and to the east of the after - school building.
29
30 Vice - Chairman Potter stated that this is not the use for this property. He is glad to see, however, that
31 the two (2) properties have come together in an attempt to develop this land.
32
33 Commissioner Tate agreed that this use is too intense for this site. He does not agree with the traffic
34 engineer's figures. Commissioner Tate agrees that it should be developed as commercial property.
35
36 Chairman Wright stated that the Commission needs to give the owners of these properties some
37 direction. The Commission agreed that a low intensity office use is most appropriate for these two
38 (2) properties.
39
40 Chairman Wright agreed that this is a great use for the City of Southlake, but it is on the wrong site.
41
42 Vice - Chairman Potter stated that the owners of the properties should be striving to combine the lots
43 and develop it as a low intensity office use.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 7 of 15
1 Motion was made to deny ZA96 -150, Rezoning and Site Plan for the Children's Courtyard.
z
3 Motion: Murphy
4 Second: Tate
5 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
6 Nays: None
7 Approved: 7 -0
8 Motion carried.
9
10 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #2589)
11
12 Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:34 p.m.
13 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 8:49 p.m.
14
15 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice - Chairman Potter presided over Agenda Item #10.
16
17 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA96 -151, SITE PLAN OF THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON:
18 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Site Plan Phase
19 I, being proposed as Lot 3, Block 60, Timarron Addition, Phase 5, and being legally described as
20 being a portion of Lots 1C2 and Lot 1B2, Block 1, Dilg Place, and being approximately 3.50 acres
21 situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. The property is located on the south
7 2 side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast corner of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M.
1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. The current zoning is "P.U.D." Planned Unit
24 Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron and permitting "C -2" Local Retail uses on this
25 site. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential (limited low intensity office and /or
26 retail uses). The Corridor Recommendation is Existing Retail Zoning. The applicant is Venus
27 (Drews) Partner V, L.P. The owner is Timarron Land Corporation. The property is in SPIN
28 Neighborhood #9. Six (6) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification
29 area, and no responses have been received.
30
31 John Drews, Venus Partners V, L.P., 5440 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 150, Dallas, Texas, presented
32 this item to the Commission. He stated that he will be consistent with Timarron's landscaping on
33 Byron Nelson Parkway; he will meet their requirements. He agreed to plant 5" caliper canopy trees
34 in the tree planters and landscaped areas.
35
36 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Drews why he needs the variance to Item #4A regarding the width
37 of the driveway on Southlake Boulevard. Planner Dennis Killough stated that Staff has discovered
38 that the maximum width requirement only applies to standard, undivided two -way driveways and
39 allows for exceptions for restricted, divided driveways such as this one. Mr. Killough stated that
40 Item #4A should be eliminated.
41
42 Mr. Drews stated that by Ordinance there is a bufferyard required on the south side between Phase
43 II and Phase III. He asked for a variance to this Item due to the fact that this is a phased project
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 8 of 15
1 which will not be completed all at once. Mr. Drews stated that in reality there will be a 3 1 /2 acre
2 bufferyard on the south side until Phase III is completed.
3
4 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Drews if he intends to have decorative lighting, and Mr.
5 Drews stated that he does intend to use decorative lighting, probably similar to Timarron's.
6
7 Referring to Item #11, Mr. Drews asked Mr. Killough if the Building 4 rear yard can be considered
8 to be the south side, and Mr. Killough stated that he does not see any problem to that.
9
10 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
11 Vice - Chairman Potter closed the public hearing.
12
13 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -151, Site Plan of The Village at Timarron, subject to Site Plan
14 Review Summary No. 1, dated November 27, 1996, deleting Item #4A, annotating in Item #11 that
15 the south side of Building 4 is a rear yard, deleting Item #6, adding 5" caliper size on canopy trees,
16 and amending Item #2 to read that no bufferyard is required along the south property line and the
17 common lot line of Lots 3 and 4.
18
19 Motion: Murphy
20 Second: Creighton
21 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
?2 Nays: None
Abstain: Wright
24 Approved: 6 - -
25 Motion carried.
26
27 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 1, section #4545)
28
29 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
30
31 AGENDA ITEM #11. ZA96 -152, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE
32 CHURCH OF CHRIST:
33 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and
34 Concept Plan on property being described as Lot 1, Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of
35 Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388 -44, Page 40, Plat
36 Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to the State of Texas by
37 Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153- 127796 -90, a certified copy of which is recorded in
38 Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Also part of this consideration
39 is a Revised Concept Plan on property being described as Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an
40 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet
41 A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot 1, Brock Addition, an Addition to the
42 City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388 -44, Page
43 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to the State of Texas
by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153- 127796 -90, a certified copy of which is recorded
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 9 of 15
1 in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is located on the
southwest corner of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The
3 current zoning is "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District (Lot 1, Brock Addition) and "CS"
4 Community Service District (Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition). The requested zoning is "CS"
5 Community Service District (Lot 1, Brock Addition). The applicant is FDS International. The
6 owners are Jimmie 0. and Judith A. Hettinger (Lot 1, Brock Addition) and Southlake Church of
7 Christ (Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition). The property is in SPIN Neighborhood #15. Twelve
8 (12) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and two (2)
9 responses were received which were both opposed.
10
11 Michael Skaistis, FDS International, 320 Decker Drive, Suite 200, Irving, Texas, presented this item
12 to the Commission. Mr. Skaistis stated that in their last SPIN meeting, it was agreed upon that the
13 lot on Brock Drive would only be used for an overflow parking lot and only on Sunday mornings.
14 He also agreed that they would immediately begin landscaping the lot on Brock Drive. Currently,
15 there is a residential driveway on Brock Drive, and Mr. Skaistis agreed to chain off this driveway
16 for all church related traffic. This driveway would only be used for service related uses for the
17 residence which is currently on that lot.
18
19 Mr. Skaistis agreed to all staff comments except for Item #2C which stipulates that there be a 500'
20 minimum spacing between the driveways. Their traffic engineer suggested the driveway layouts as
21 shown, and he requested that the Commission allow them as shown.
72
He also asked for a variance to Item #2D which stipulates minimum driveway throat depth
24 requirements. Mr. Skaistis stated that due to existing structures, the existing driveway does not meet
25 the required throat depth.
26
27 Mr. Skaistis asked for a variance to Item #3 which states that the parking spaces encroach into the
28 north bufferyard. Again, he stated that this is an existing parking lot and bufferyard, and it would
29 be a great financial hardship to remove them.
30
31 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Skaistis to clarify the use of the driveway on Brock Drive. He
32 stated that he is requesting that they be allowed to maintain that driveway for service needs only.
33 He stated that examples of the service needs might be: service to utilities, the moving of furniture,
34 repairs to the house, etc. The residence will be used as a teaching facility for the time being. Mr.
35 Skaistis stated that the driveway will be removed completely when the residence is removed, and
36 at that time, a parking lot will be built and the entrance to this lot will be moved to the west property
37 line.
38
39 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Skaistis why he increased the number of parking spaces from
40 the last plan by approximately 120 spaces. She stated that one of the surrounding residents' concerns
41 on the last plan was the number of parking spaces. She stated that this site already had drainage
42 problems without an additional acre of parking. Mr. Skaistis stated that this plan meets all statutes
43 and ordinances in the City of Southlake. He does intend to meet every requirement of the
ordinances.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 10 of 15
1 Commissioner Creighton stated that Ms. Vargas, an adjacent homeowner, told her that she is very
2 concerned about the additional number of parking spaces and their impact on the drainage.
3
4 Mr. Skaistis stated that he intends to use box -type lighting which will not project light onto
5 neighboring properties.
6
7 Mr. Skaistis stated that there has been a dispute regarding the south property line. He had a surveyor
8 look at the property and upon his findings, Mr. Skaistis will replat the property to show that the
9 south property line is to follow the fence line. He believes that the adjacent property owner, Jack
10 Weisman, is in agreement with the survey.
11
12 Toby Slowe, preaching minister of the Southlake Church of Christ, stated that he is one of the few
13 people that have been with the church from the beginning. He feels as though the development of
14 the buildings "got away" from them in the beginning. In order to cut costs, they hired a one -man
15 architectural firm. He admits now that they made a mistake that caused flooding to neighboring
16 properties. He wants to be sensitive to his neighbors and feels they are on the right track by hiring
17 the architectural firm of FDS International.
18
19 Commissioner Creighton stated that she would like to hear the opinion of the City Engineer, Ron
20 Harper, regarding the drainage problems.
21
22 Mr. Harper stated that he received the drainage information from Post, Buckley, Schuh, & Jernigan,
and he does not feel it is detailed enough for him to determine if this property can handle its water
24 on -site. He stated that the engineering department made several requests for more detailed
25 information, and they still have not received it. Mr. Harper stated that he is not saying that the water
26 cannot be properly detained; he is saying that it has not been proven to him. He does not feel
27 comfortable with the information he currently has. He feels the neighbors have legitimate
28 complaints regarding this facilities' drainage problems. He acknowledged the fact that drainage
29 normally is not discussed in detail at the concept plan stage, but he feels that this is the time to
30 discuss it on this particular case due to the extreme sensitivity of the issue.
31
32 Wayne Barton, of Post, Buckley, Schuh, & Jernigan, 5999 Summerside Drive, Dallas, Texas, stated
33 that he is a drainage engineer who has been designing detention ponds for about twenty (20) years.
34 Although he does have extensive experience in drainage, he acknowledged that he does not have
35 extensive experience with this particular site. Initially, he was asked to analyze the main site,
36 excluding the Brock Drive lot, from a concept basis only and to determine its' feasibility to construct
37 detention facilities on -site that would be able to release water at a rate that is no greater than what
38 existed prior to any improvements on the site under natural conditions. Upon doing some initial
39 calculations, he determined that by using several shallow storage facilities, there is enough land to
40 accomplish his goal.
41
42 Commissioner Creighton stated that she feels it is premature to ask the Commission to consider this
43 item until further drainage calculations are completed.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 11 of 15
l Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Barton if he intends to detain any water on the roof of the building.
Mr. Barton stated that he does not recommend roof storage. Mr. Barton stated that the areas shown
3 on the plans are intended to be detention ponds, not retention ponds. They are designed to fill up
4 in a storm and be completely drained by the next storm. He always designs them to be completely
5 drained in twenty -four (24) hours.
6
7 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Barton if he has done additional work on this site since his
8 initial calculations. Mr. Barton stated that he has had one (1) phone call with Mr. Harper and has
9 sent one (1) letter to Mr. Harper. He also attended the SPIN #15 meeting with the Southlake Church
10 of Christ at their request.
11
12 Chairman Wright thanked Mr. Barton for being extremely candid with the Commission and asked
13 the Commission to set aside the drainage issues for the time being to discuss other concerns since
14 the drainage issues obviously were not going to be solved in one (1) night. Chairman Wright stated
15 that the Commission needs to lead the applicant in the right direction regarding the concept plan.
16
17 Commissioner Murphy questioned whether or not the Commission should spend any time at all
18 reviewing this plan because he feels it will significantly change after Mr. Barton completes further
19 drainage calculations.
20
21 Commissioner Creighton agreed with Commissioner Murphy that the Commission could be wasting
22 their time reviewing a plan which might be drastically changed after further studies are completed.
24 Vice - Chairman Potter asked the applicant how he intends to restrict the access to the entrance only
25 and the exit only driveways. Mr. Slowe responded by saying that the church intends to physically
26 man the two (2) driveways. He continued by saying that they do not have unattended parking at any
27 time.
28
29 Chairman Wright suggested that the applicant switch the locations of the entrance only and the exit
30 only driveways to allow for enough throat depth on the entrance only driveway. Mr. Skaistis agreed
31 with that recommendation. Vice - Chairman Potter asked the applicant if he would also extend the
32 bufferyard down on the new entrance only driveway in order to create more throat depth, and Mr.
33 Skaistis said he would do that.
34
35 At 11:00 p.m., Chairman Wright announced that due to Case Limitation Resolution #95 -24, the only
36 case that can be heard after this one is Agenda Item #15.
37
38 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Skaistis if he would remove the parking spaces directly in
39 front of the new exit only driveway, and he stated that he would.
40
41 Vice - Chairman Potter asked if the applicant would increase the south and east bufferyards on the
42 Brock Drive parking lot in order to buffer the residential properties.
43
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 12 of 15
1 Chairman Wright stated that he wants the Brock Drive house removed completely the minute that
2 lot is used as a parking lot. He does not want to see cars parked on the grass in front of that house.
3
4 Commissioner Edmondson asked that the applicant return to Planning & Zoning Commission with
5 figures for the building size and the lot coverage.
6
7 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
8
9 Jack Weisman, 2607 W. Southlake Blvd, Southlake, Texas, found it ironic that this application which
10 is ZA96 -152 does not differ much from ZA96 -110 which was denied by Planning & Zoning
11 Commission. He thinks that it is a good thing that the church is expanding, but he is extremely
12 concerned about their ability to detain the water. He would like to see a water detainment plan and
13 an elevation plan on this property. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Weisman if he would work with the
14 church if they needed an easement on his property, and he said he would be willing to work with
15 them.
16
17 Wayne Haney, SPIN #15 Representative, 400 Brock Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that Mr. Peters
18 and Mrs. Horton are getting considerable run -off from the church's property. Mr. Peters and Mrs.
19 Horton also get lighting from the parking lots and noise from the air conditioner. Mr. Haney feels
20 that with adequate landscaping, these problems can be significantly reduced. He is not opposed to
21 the plan, but he is very concerned about the drainage problems.
22
Chairman Wright asked the applicant if he could place something around the air conditioner in order
24 to minimize the noise, and Mr. Slowe said he could do that.
25
26 Chairman Wright asked the applicant to have more detail and commitments on the lighting when
27 they return to Planning & Zoning Commission.
28
29 Motion was made to table ZA96 -152, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Southlake Church of Christ,
30 and to continue the Public Hearing until the January 23, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning
31 Commission Meeting.
32
33 Motion: Potter
34 Second: Murphy
35 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
36 Nays: None
37 Approved: 7 -0
38 Motion carried.
39
40 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 2, section #2315)
41
42 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice - Chairman Potter presided over Agenda Item #15.
43
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 13 of 15
1 AGENDA ITEM #15, ZA96 -156, REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TIMARRON
2 ADDITION:
3 Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Revised
4 Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, Phase 5, being 23.82 acres situated in the Obediah W.
5 Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tract 2A5, portions of Tracts 2A3, 2B and 5D, and Lots
6 1B and 2B of Spring Creek Acres. The plat proposes 58 residential lots and 2 common areas. The
7 property is located on the west side of the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway, approximately 450'
8 north of the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and Lilac Lane. The current zoning is "R- P.U.D.
9 No. 1" Residential Planned Unit Development. The Land Use Category is Low Density
10 Residential (may include limited low intensity office and /or retail uses) and 100 Year Flood Plain.
11 The owner and applicant is Timarron Land Corporation. Thirteen (13) written notices were sent
12 to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses were received.
13
14 Todd Janssen, Carter & Burgess, Inc., 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Dallas, Texas, presented this item to
15 the Commission. He asked the Commission to waive Item #6 in order to get a better configuration
16 of lots in the subdivision.
17
18 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
19 Vice - Chairman Potter closed the public hearing.
20
21 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -156, Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, subject
2 2 to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated December 13, 1996, deleting Item #6.
24 Motion: Murphy
25 Second: Edmondson
26 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
27 Nays: None
28 Abstain: Wright
29 Approved: 6 -0 -1
30 Motion carried.
31
32 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 2, section #2624)
33
34 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
35
36 AGENDA ITEM #12. ZA 96 -71, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE) GREAT
37 OUTDOOR LANDSCAPE;
38 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA96 -155, REZONING FOR CALLICOTT /RHODES FARM;
39 AGENDA ITEM #14, ZA96 -154. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CALLICOTT /RHODES FARM,
40 AND
41 AGENDA ITEM #16, ZA96 -157, SITE PLAN OF TIMARRON NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
42 NUMBER 2:
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 14 of 15
1 Motion was made to table ZA96 -71, ZA96 -155, ZA96 -154, and ZA96 -157 and to continue the
2 Public Hearing to the January 9, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting due to
3 the Case Limitation Resolution No. 95 -24.
4
5 Motion: Murphy
6 Second: Creighton
7 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
8 Nays: None
9 Approved: 7 -0
10 Motion carried.
11
12 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 2, section #2646)
13
14 AGENDA ITEM #17, MEETING ADJOURNMENT:
15 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 11:53 p.m. on December 19, 1996.
16
17 Motion: Murphy
18 Second: Potter
19 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Wright, Potter, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton
20 Nays: None
21 Approved: 7 -0
92 Motion carried.
24 (Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, 12- 19 -96, tape 2, section #2654)
25
26
27 ,
3§ ri h�
30 Joe W g
31 Chairman
32
33
34 ATTEST:
35
36
37 1
i§ a� (. tr(.41..(X.-0
40 Lori A. Farwell
41 Community Development Secretary
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on December 19, 1996 Page 15 of 15
THE STATE OF TEXAS *
*
COUNTY OF_____1 r ra ► *
1, i 0 1,Or 1 ` k-1' as a member of the N" (a 0 ✓ III "4
make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and/or a person or persons related
to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote
or decision of the i-A ( - « 1 `f 7-A 1662 as those terms are defined in
Chapter 171, Texas Local Government Code.
The business entity is -- Vol cAr r 0 L dkCC l ryor r riA
(name) ?cam . Cyr '' -{'E'" 4 'u I4Q I LI 2c
-r r v l i . , - TX 7 EO c- 2
(address)
I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (check all which are
applicable)
Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity.
Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the
business entity.
_Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the
previous year.
_Real property is involved and have an .
equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500.
A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that
would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a member.
Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on
any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter
whatsoever.
Signed this . day of • Vti , 19 ► .
i
/
Signature o s fficial
V 4 2 '
Title
1 L.
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared G(r''. tt riei �
U i
on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of VV1 l 1 knowledge or
belief.
Sworn to and subscribed to before me on this I day of l IC' -eti/1/1 , 19 % .
�q
kl PU KAREN P. GANDY Fl // onaA _
,
. ; � r\ * Notary Public i
�. ' . Notary Public in and for e State of Texas
'' STATATE OF Ti=XAS �
' s My Comm. Exp. 03/19/98
! /
! ..1. \.,ti. AN1S.a
.,. !♦.. ,. \ - !l,,. Karol /�� I P. GAnd j
Type/Print Notary's Name
My Commission Expires:
311q /q1
G:\WPRFORMS\AFFID.FRM