Loading...
1996-10-17 P&Z Meeting City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 17, 1996 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of October 3, 1996. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider: ZA 96 -110, REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST, being legally described as Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition and being approximately 6.8 acres. Location: 2501 W. Southlake Blvd., approximately 300' east of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District. Applicant: FDS International. Owner: Southlake Church of Christ. SPIN Neighborhood #15. 5. Consider: ZA 96 -129, PLAT VACATION, of property legally described as Lots 1, 2, and 3 Spring Creek Acres, being approximately 6.947 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, as recorded in Volume 388 -202, Page 74, P.R.T.C.T. Location: Pine Court East, being approximately 230' east of the intersection of Pine Court East, and Pine Drive. Current Zoning: "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District and "PUD" Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. Owners: Timarron Land Corporation and Keith Freeza. SPIN Neighborhood #10. 6. Consider: ZA 96 -130, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON COMMERICAL, TRACT 1, being approximately 58.202 acres situated in the James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620, Tract 1, as recorded in Volume 9827, Page 974, D.R.T.C.T. Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Dove Road and State Highway No. 114. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SP -2" Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C -3" General Commercial District, "C -4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B -1" Business Service Park District, "B -2" Commercial Manufacturing District, and "HC" Hotel District. Owner and City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 1996 PAGE 2 Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #2. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA 96 -131, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON COMMERICAL, TRACT II, being Tracts 3 and 4A1 in the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299; Tracts 1, 2, and 3A1 in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and being approximately 271.908 acres. Location: East of North White Chapel Blvd., West of North Carroll Avenue and North of State Highway No. 114. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR -PUD" Non - Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C -3" General Commercial District, "C -4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B -1" Business Service Park District, "B -2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "I -1" Light Industrial District, "I -2" Heavy Industrial District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE" Residential Estate District, " SF -1A" Single Family District, "SF -30" Single Family District, and "MF -2 "Multiple Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA 96 -132, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON COMMERCIAL, TRACT III, approximately 200.822 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D. Location: North of State Highway No. 114, East of N. Carroll Ave., South of E. Highland St., and West of N. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR -PUD" Non - Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C -3" General Commercial District, "C -4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B -1" Business Service Park District, "B -2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "I -1" Light Industrial District, "I -2" Heavy Industrial District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE "" Residential Estate District, " SF -1A" Single Family District, "SF -30" Single Family District, and "MF -2 "Multiple Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhoods #4 & #6. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA 96 -133, AMENDED PLAT, for Lot 35R, Block 1, Lots 1R, 3R, and 16R, City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 1996 PAGE 3 Block 4, and Lots 13R and 15R Block 5, being an amendment to Lot 35, Block 1, Lots 1, 3, and 16, Block 4, and Lots 13 and 15, Block 5, Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase Two, being approximately 2.3928 acres situated in the N.E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, and being 6 residential lots. Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase Two, is located Southwest of the intersection of Burney Lane and Lonesome Dove Ave. and the affected lots are on McCrae Trail; along Horsehead Crossing, Hat Creek Trail and Powder River Trail; and along Palo Duro Trail, respectively. Current Zoning: "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 5, Lonesome Dove Estates. Owner and Applicant: H. Creek Development Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #3. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA 96 -134, CONCEPT PLAN OF THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON, being legally described as being Lot 1C2 and a portion of Lots 1B2 and 1A2A, Block 1, Dilg Place, being approximately 7.627 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location: South side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. Current Zoning: "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. Applicant: Drews Realty Group. Owner: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #9. Public Hearing. 11. Consider: ZA 96 -135, REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE PROPOSED LOTS 2, 3, AND 4, BLOCK 60, TIMARRON ADDITION, PHASE 5, being legally described as being Lot 1 C2 and a portion of Lots 1 B2 and 1 A2A, Block 1, Dilg Place, being approximately 7.627 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location: South side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. Current Zoning: "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #9. Public Hearing. 12. Consider: ZA 96 -136, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN, for approximately 23.7 acres being Tract 3F and approximately 0.186 acres being a portion of Tract 3E in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. This request proposes 63 residential lots, 2 non- residential lots and 3 common areas. Location: North side of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). approximately 1140' west of the intersection of East Southlake Blvd. and N. Carroll Ave. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District, and "0-1" Office District. Requested Zoning: (on the above referenced 23.89 acres) is "SF -20A" Single Family Residential District. A Concept Plan for Fox Glen totaling approximately 48.9 acres will be considered with the rezoning request plus additional acreage as follows: approximately 21.72 acres, described as the northern portion of Tract 3E in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, previously zoned "SF -20A" zoning and approved as Country Meadow Estates; approximately 1.72 City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 1996 PAGE 4 acres zoned "0-1" Office District; and approximately 1.57 acres zoned "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District. Applicant: Crumbaker Development, Inc. Owners: Beulah Cross c/o Ben Muir (Tract 3F) and Homei Liao and Jai Her Hwang, Trustees (portion of Tract 3E). SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA 96 -137, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FOX GLEN, on property described as being approximately 48.9 acres, being Tracts 3E and 3F in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. This plat proposes 63 residential lots, 2 non - residential lots, and 3 common areas. Location: North side of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1140' west of the intersection of East Southlake Blvd. and N. Carroll Ave. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District, "SF -20A" Single Family Residential, "C -1" Neighborhood Commercial District, and "0-1" Office District. Applicant: Crumbaker Development, Inc. Owners: Homei Liao and Jai Her Hwang, Trustees (Tract 3E) and Beulah Cross c/o Ben Muir (Tract 3F). SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: ZA 96 -138, SITE PLAN FOR KINGSLEY PLACE, an Assisted Living Facility on the proposed Lot 4R -1, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C -1, on property legally described as being the northwestern portion of Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C -1, being approximately 4.246 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. This plan proposes an assisted living facility containing 80 units. Location: East side of North Peytonville Avenue. approximately 200' north of the intersection of N. Peytonville Ave. and W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District. Applicant: Aguirre Inc. Owner: Southridge Center LP. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: ZA 96 -139, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPSED LOTS 4R -1 AND 4R -2, BLOCK 6, SOUTHRIDGE LAKES, PHASE C -1, being a revision of Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C -1, being approximately 8.833 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. Location: East side of North Peytonville Avenue. approximately 200' north of the intersection of N. Peytonville Ave. and W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District. Applicant: Aguirre Inc. Owner: Southridge Center LP. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing. 16. Consider: ZA 96 -140, FINAL PLAT OF THE PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC ADDITION, on property legally described as approximately 0.971 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being a portion of Tract 1C3. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard. approximately 750' west of the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard and Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan " City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 1996 PAGE 5 District. Applicant: Terry Wilkinson. Owner: First American Savings Banc, S.S.B., Shareholder's Trust. SPIN Neighborhood #10. 17. Consider: ZA 96 -119, FINAL PLAT FOR LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 1, FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC ADDITION, being approximately 3.829 acres in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being a portion of Tract 1C3, as recorded in Volume 10641, Page 1628 D.R.T.C.T. The plat proposes four commercial lots. Location: West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 750' west of the intersection of North White Chapel Blvd. and Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan. Applicant: Terry Wilkinson. Owner: First American Savings Banc, S.S.B., Shareholder's Trust. SPIN Neighborhood #10. 18. Consider: ORDINANCE NO. 480-W, REVISIONS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480, pertaining to telecommunication facilities, including towers, antennas, satellite dishes, and ancillary structures and the definition of kennel. Public Hearing. 19. Consider: MEETING ADJOURNMENT. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Frida ; biskal , 1996 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. • s° "s'% a Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481 -5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. L: \W P- FILES \MTG\AGN\ 1996 \ 10- 17 -96. WPD . REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING October 17, 1996 1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Vice - Chairman Rex Potter; Members: Ann Creighton, Debra 2 Edmondson, Dona Schroetke, and Lanny Tate 3 4 COMMISSION ABSENT: Chairman Joe Wright and Commissioner James Murphy 5 6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Greg Last, Zoning Administrator 7 Karen Gandy, City Engineer Ron Harper, and Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell 8 9 The meeting was called to order by Vice - Chairman Potter at 7:05 p.m. 10 11 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 12 Vice - Chairman Potter opened discussion of the minutes of the October 3, 1996, Regular Planning 13 and Zoning Commission Meeting. 14 15 Commissioner Edmondson motioned that the minutes be approved subject to the changes discussed 16 in the work session. 17 1 8 Motion was made to approve the minutes of the October 3, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, as amended. 20 21 Motion: Edmondson 22 Second: Creighton 23 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 24 Nays: None 25 Approved: 5 -0 26 Motion carried. 27 28 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #26) 29 30 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 31 Community Development Director Greg Last reminded the Commission that there is training 32 available to them at North Central Texas Council of Governments, and to call Administrative 33 Secretary Lori Farwell if they desire to attend. 34 35 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 96 -110, REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF 36 CHRIST: 37 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -110 and to continue the Public Hearing 38 to the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. 39 Motion: Tate Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 1 of 13 ' Second: Creighton L Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 3 Nays: None 4 Approved: 5 -0 5 Motion carried. 6 7 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #84) 8 9 AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA 96 -130. REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON 10 COMMERCIAL, TRACT I: 11 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -130 and to continue the Public Hearing 12 to the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. 13 14 Motion: Edmondson 15 Second: Creighton 16 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 17 Nays: None 18 Approved: 5 -0 19 Motion carried. 20 21 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #96) 22 AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA 96 -131, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON 24 COMMERCIAL. TRACT II: 25 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -131 and to continue the Public Hearing 26 to the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. 27 28 Motion: Tate 29 Second: Edmondson 30 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 31 Nays: None 32 Approved: 5 -0 33 Motion carried. 34 35 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #103) 36 37 AGENDA ITEM #8. ZA 96 -132, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON 38 COMMERCIAL, TRACT III: 39 AGENDA ITEM #9, ZA 96 -133, AMENDED PLAT: 40 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA 96 -136, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN: 41 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 96 -137, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FOX GLEN: 42 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -132, ZA96 -133, ZA96 -136, and ZA96 - 43 137 and to continue the Public Hearing to the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 2 of 13 Motion: Tate 2 Second: Creighton 3 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 4 Nays: None 5 Approved: 5 -0 6 Motion carried. 7 8 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #130) 9 10 AGENDA ITEM #17, ZA96 -119, FINAL PLAT FOR LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 1, FIRST 11 AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC ADDITION: 12 Motion was made at the applicant's request to withdraw ZA96 -119. 13 14 Motion: Creighton 15 Second: Edmondson 16 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 17 Nays: None 18 Approved: 5 -0 19 Motion carried. 20 21 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #139) AGENDA ITEM #5. ZA 96 -129, PLAT VACATION: 24 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a 25 Plat Vacation of property legally described as Lots 1, 2, and 3 Spring Creek Acres, being 26 approximately 6.947 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, as recorded 27 in Volume 388 -202, Page 74, P.R.T.C.T. The property is located on Pine Court East, being 28 approximately 230' east of the intersection of Pine Court East and Pine Drive. The current zoning 29 is "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District and "PUD" Planned Unit Development District, being 30 P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. The Land Use Category indicates Low Density Residential (may include 31 limited low intensity office and /or retail uses). The applicant is Timarron Land Corporation. The 32 owners are Timarron Land Corporation and Keith Freeza. The property is in SPIN Neighborhood 33 #10. There were no property owner notifications required on this application, although there were 34 some notices sent in error. 35 36 Todd Janssen, Carter & Burgess, 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas presented this item 37 to the Commission. 38 39 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -129, Plat Vacation. 40 41 Motion: Tate 42 Second: Edmondson 43 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton Nays: None Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 3 of 13 Approved: 5 -0 2 Motion carried. 3 4 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #225) 5 6 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA96 -134, CONCEPT PLAN OF THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON: 7 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a 8 property being legally described as Lot 1C2 and a portion of Lots 1B2 and 1A2A, Block 1, Dilg 9 Place, being approximately 7.627 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. 10 The property is located on the south side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast 11 corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. The current 12 zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. 13 The Land Use Category indicates Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity 14 office and/or retail uses). The Corridor Recommendation is Existing Retail Zoning. The applicant 15 is Drews Realty Group. The owner is Timarron Land Corporation. The property is in SPIN 16 Neighborhood #9. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification 17 area, and one (1) response outside the notification area was received and was in favor. 18 19 John Drews, Drews Realty Group, 5440 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 150, Dallas, Texas presented this 20 item to the Commission. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Drews why there were so many Staff 21 Comments, and Mr. Drews stated that most of the items were simply narrative items and not terribly critical, but that they would be corrected. -J 24 Tony Callaway, Callaway Architects, 17738 Preston Road, Suite 125, Dallas, Texas stated that the 25 concept they are incorporating into this development is an entirely new concept in this area. It is 26 more of a "village" concept than a typical retail - commercial development. He stated that this 27 concept encourages pedestrian traffic. He stated that the site is small and does not allow room for 28 minimum throat depth requirements. 29 30 Commissioner Tate asked Mr. Drews if he has any exceptions to the Staff Review Letter. Mr. Drews 31 asked for an exception to Item #6B regarding the bufferyard requirements. Mr. Drews stated that 32 since Timarron Land Corporation owns the property, he is required by them to be consistent with 33 the bufferyards already on Byron Nelson Parkway and that those requirements exceed the City's 34 requirements. 35 36 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Drews if the labeling is incorrect on the concept plan which 37 shows a 5' bufferyard with Type A plantings on Byron Nelson Parkway. He stated that it should 38 read 30' bufferyard with Type C plantings, and that he would make that correction. 39 40 Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Drews if the fencing on the east property line is supposed to be 41 masonry according to the Corridor Overlay Ordinance, and Community Development Director Greg 42 Last stated that the only bufferyards that were changed in the Corridor were the ones actually along a3 the Corridor and not the ones between adjacent uses. Mr. Drews stated that he intends to place a Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 4 of 13 masonry fence along the east property line, anyway, and that he will make that change on the 2 concept plan. 3 "' 4 Mr. Drews stated that he is requesting a variance on Item #9B which states that the proposed • 5 driveway intersecting F. M. 1709 must be a minimum of 500' from the southeast intersection of F.M. 6 1709 and Byron Nelson Parkway. He also requested a variance on Item #9C which states that the • 7 minimum driveway throat depth required for each driveway into the site is 100'. Mr. Drews also 8 asked for a variance on Item #9E which requires a traffic impact analysis. 9 10 Commissioner Schroetke stated her concern regarding the lack of interior landscaping on this site. 4" 11 She said that there are a large number of buildings on this site which require the removal of interior ". 12 bufferyards. 13 1.1 14 Mr. Callaway stated although it does not have much interior landscaping, The Village at Timarron 15 will be highly hard - scaped with many details in items such as awnings, park benches, potted plants, 16 and decorative lighting fixtures. 17 " 18 Mr. Last stated that City Staff would calculate the interior landscaping upon submittal of a site plan, 19 and he recommended for the Commission to defer consideration on the interior landscaping at this 20 time. 21 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Drews if the full access driveway on Southlake Boulevard could 3 be down- graded any at all, and Mr. Drews stated that the full access driveway is essential to the bank 24 which will be located on the northeast corner of the property. 25 w. 26 Commissioner Schroetke was concerned with the safety of a full access driveway regarding the 27 proposed light at the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. She said it " 28 would create a dangerous situation because people traveling west on Southlake Boulevard would be 29 entering the left hand turn lane, and people exiting this site would be turning left into the same lane. 30 31 Commissioner Tate asked Mr. Last the approximate stacking length of the left hand turn lane on 32 Southlake Boulevard. Mr. Last stated that it would be approximately 200' -250'. 33 34 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Drews to eliminate some parking spaces to reduce the number of 35 cars backing up into the full access driveway on Southlake Boulevard. Mr. Drews agreed to • 36 eliminate five (5) parking spaces closest to the driveway on Southlake Boulevard, three (3) parking 37 spaces closest to the full access driveway on Byron Nelson Parkway, and three (3) parking spaces 38 closest to the right -in, right -out driveway on Byron Nelson Parkway. He stated he would instead gm 39 enlarge the landscape parking islands in these areas. as 40 41 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. "" 42 Vice - Chairman Potter closed the public hearing. 43 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 5 of 13 Commissioner Creighton stated that in rush -hour traffic this property will be used as a cut - through 2 to avoid the light, although it would probably be used more for a right -out onto Southlake 3 Boulevard. 4 5 Motion was made approve ZA96 -134, Concept Plan of The Village at Timarron, subject to Concept 6 Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated October 11, 1996, amending the bufferyard along Byron Nelson 7 Parkway as 30' with Type C plantings, deleting the five (5) closest parking places to the driveway 8 on Southlake Boulevard, deleting the three (3) closest parking places to both driveways on Byron 9 Nelson Parkway, deleting Items #9B(driveway spacing on F.M.1709), 9C (driveway throat depth), 10 and 9E (traffic impact analysis), deferring action on Item #6B regarding all internal bufferyards until 11 the Site Plan, and showing a solid masonry wall on Item #7. 12 13 Motion: Creighton 14 Second: Tate 15 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 16 Nays: None 17 Approved: 5 -0 18 Motion carried. 19 20 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #2407) 21 AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA96 -135, REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE PROPOSED LOTS 2. 3, AND 4, BLOCK 60. TIMARRON ADDITION, PHASE 5: 24 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a 25 property being legally described as Lot 1C2 and a portion of Lots 1B2 and 1A2A, Block 1, Dilg 26 Place, being approximately 7.627 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. 27 The property is located on the south side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast 28 corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. The Land Use 29 Category is Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and /or retail 30 uses). The Corridor Recommendation is Existing Retail Zoning. The current zoning is "R- P.U.D." 31 Residential Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron. The owner and 32 applicant is Timarron Land Corporation. The property is in SPIN Neighborhood #9. Nine (9) written 33 notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response outside 34 the notification area was received and was in favor. 35 36 Todd Janssen, Carter & Burgess, 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas presented this item 37 to the Commission. He asked to defer the requirements listed in Staff Comments Items #3 (revised 38 water, sewer, and drainage plans) and 5A (drainage and utility easements per the Public Works 39 Department) until the Site Plan. 40 41 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 42 Vice - Chairman Potter closed the public hearing. 43 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 6 of 13 Motion was made approve ZA96 -135, Revised Preliminary Plat of the proposed Lots 2, 3, and 4, 2 Block 60, Timarron Addition, Phase 5, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 3 1996, deferring Items #3 and 5A until the Site Plan. 4 5 Motion: Creighton 6 Second: Edmondson 7 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 8 Nays: None 9 Approved: 5 -0 10 Motion carried. 11 12 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #2592) 13 14 Vice - Chairman Potter called for a recess at 8:29 p.m. 15 Vice - Chairman Potter called the meeting back to order at 8:40 p.m. 16 17 AGENDA ITEM #14, ZA96 -138, SITE PLAN FOR KINGSLEY PLACE: 18 Vice - Chairman Potter stated that due to property owner notification problems, this item must be 19 tabled until the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. Although the applicant 20 will present this case to the Commission and the Public Hearing will be opened, action must be 21 deferred until the next meeting. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for an 24 Assisted Living Facility on the proposed Lot 4R -1, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C -1, on 25 property legally described as being the northwestern portion of Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, 26 Phase C -1, being approximately 4.246 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. 27 This plan proposes an assisted living facility containing 80 units. The property is located on the east 28 side of North Peytonville Avenue, approximately 200' north of the intersection of N. Peytonville 29 Ave. and W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The Land Use Category is Mixed Use (may include 30 office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs). The 31 Corridor Recommendation is Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C -1, C -2, C -3 and B -1 32 districts). The current zoning is "C -3" General Commercial District. The applicant is Aguirre, Inc., 33 for their client, Integrated Living Communities. The owner is Southridge Center LP. The property 34 is in SPIN Neighborhood #13. Twenty -five (25) written notices were sent to property owners within 35 the 200' notification area, and two (2) responses was received which were opposed. 36 37 Jake Ussery, Aguirre, Inc., 12700 Park Central Drive, Suite 1508, Dallas, Texas presented this case 38 to the Commission. Mr. Ussery stated that he attended a SPIN Meeting approximately one (1) 39 month ago in which he presented this site plan. He said there will be eighty (80) units in which 40 about four - tenths of the residents will have vehicles, so thirty -two (32) parking spaces would be 41 adequate, although the site plan is showing 80 parking spaces as required by Staff. 42 43 Mac McWilliams of Carlson, Salcedo, McWiliiams, Inc., 1201 Main Street, Suite 1530, Dallas, Texas is the engineer on this project. He stated that he received Staff Comments and can comply Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 7 of 13 • with all comments except for Item #5 in which he asked for an exception to the required throat depth 2 depending on the number parking spaces required by Staff. If they have thirty -two (32) parking 3 spaces, they will meet the throat depth requirement; if they have eighty (80) parking spaces, they do 4 not meet the throat depth requirement. 5 6 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy her reading on the number of 7 parking spaces required on this site. Ms. Gandy stated that the Zoning Ordinance, Section 35.6 (4) 8 reads: 9 10 "Nursing, Rest or Convalescent Home, Home for the Aged, Senior Citizens Apartment 11 Dwelling, or Other Similar Dwelling or Institution: 1 space per each 3 beds or 1 space per 12 individual sleeping unit, whichever is greater." 13 14 Ms. Gandy proceeded to say that one (1) space per individual sleeping unit is the greater of the two 15 (2), which would equal eighty (80) parking spaces. 16 17 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Ussery if he had examples of other facilities built by Aguirre, Inc., 18 and Mr. Ussery stated that this will be the first facility of this type by Aguirre, Inc. Mr. Ussery said 19 that Aguirre, Inc. has approximately 150 nursing homes around the country, but this will be their 20 first assisted living facility. 21 Commissioner Schroetke stated her extreme concern for the safety of this facility's residents due to the lack of sufficient bufferyards and perimeter fencing. She is also concerned about the safety of 24 the residents who have diminished mental capacity being that this is such a busy intersection. 25 26 Mr. Ussery responded by saying that there will be employees to watch the residents twenty -four (24) 27 hours a day, and that the residents Ms. Schroetke referred to will be watched very closely at all 28 times. He said they do not want to build a wall around this facility which would create an 29 institution -like environment. 30 31 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Ussery the name of the principal owner who built the 150 32 nursing homes mentioned earlier. Mr. Ussery stated that their name is Integrated Living 33 Communities, and they are on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange as ILCC. 34 35 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Ussery if he can meet the articulation requirements as stipulated 36 in the Staff Comments. Mr. Ussery stated that he will meet with his architect and submit revised 37 drawings in an attempt to comply with Staff Comments. Vice - Chairman Potter again stressed the 38 importance of meeting the articulation requirements. 39 40 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. 41 42 Tom Chapman, 402 Valverde Court, Southlake, Texas was concerned about how this facility will 43 impact Southridge Lakes subdivision. He was worried about items such as parking lot lighting, hours of deliveries, arrivals of ambulances, and outside storage of kitchen racks, etc. He also stated Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 8 of 13 his concern with the safety of the residents at this busy intersection. He would also like to know 2 what materials were going to be used on this building and if they would be compatible with 3 Southridge Lakes. 4 5 Vice - Chairman Potter asked Mr. Chapman if he would rather have retail at this location, and Mr. 6 Chapman said he would rather see garden offices or some type of quality retail center that would 7 enhance both the retail side and the residential side. 8 9 James C. Piatt, 111 Killdeer Court, Southlake, Texas stated that he lives in Lot 8 which is directly 10 opposite the driveway to the proposed facility. He is very concerned that car lights going in and out 11 of the property will shine into his bedroom window. He attended the SPIN meeting and was told 12 that this property would be on seven (7) or eight (8) acres instead of the four (4) acres as proposed. 13 He was also told at the SPIN meeting that the entrance would be on Southlake Boulevard, not on 14 Peytonville Ave. He would definitely prefer a quality retail development over this proposal. He 15 feels that the 5' bufferyards are inadequate, and that Aguirre, Inc. should be required to have eighty 16 (80) parking spaces. He was also wondering if Peytonville Ave. is going to be widened and the 17 effect that would have on this property and on his property. 18 19 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Piatt if the plan brought to the SPIN meeting was different 20 from the plan proposed tonight, and he said it was significantly different. 21 Ruth Ann Askew, 1213 Cross Timber Drive, Southlake, Texas represented the Senior Advisory Commission in stating that there needs to be an assisted living type of facility in Southlake. She 24 asked the Commission to please not confuse multi - family housing with this type of facility. 25 26 Noel Wallace, 200 Donley Court, Southlake, Texas stated his concern regarding the problems with 27 property owner notifications. He said that he initially received the wrong notification and has not 28 received the correct notification yet. He is frustrated about the piecemeal approach this commercial 29 development is taking. He is also concerned about parking lot lighting, delivery times and 30 bufferyards. He would like to see more landscaping between this property and the residential 31 properties. 32 33 Vice - Chairman Potter reiterated the fact that the Public Hearing will stay open until the November 34 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning Meeting. 35 36 Mr. Ussery stated that he did not even have a site plan for the SPIN meeting referred to earlier. He 37 stated that he did not know at the time of the SPIN meeting that the property entrance was not on 38 Southlake Boulevard. He stated that he was made aware of that fact the following day and informed 39 the SPIN representatives who were at the meeting and Commissioner Schroetke as soon as he found 40 out. He said that he did not mean to mislead anyone. 41 42 Commissioner Edmondson stated her frustration with assisted living facilities which look like 43 "institutions ". She hopes that Aguirre, Inc. strives to avoid that as much as possible. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 9 of 13 Mr. Ussery stated that they (Aguirre, Inc.) are willing to match the brick, color of brick, and color 2 of paint to coordinate with the Southridge Lakes residential development. 3 4 Vice - Chairman Potter asked that Mr. Ussery try to minimize Staff Comments and to organize 5 another SPIN meeting before the next meeting, and he said he would do that. 6 7 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -138, Site Plan for Kingsley Place, and 8 to continue the Public Hearing to the November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. 9 10 Motion: Edmondson 11 Second: Creighton 12 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 13 Nays: None 14 Approved: 5 -0 15 Motion carried. 16 17 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #4897) 18 19 AGENDA ITEM #15, ZA96 -139, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 4R -1 AND 4R- 20 2, BLOCK 6, SOUTHRIDGE LAKES, PHASE C -1: 21 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA96 -139, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots " . 4R -1 and 4R -2, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C -1, and to continue the Public Hearing to the -J November 7, 1996, Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting. 24 25 Motion: Creighton 26 Second: Tate 27 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 28 Nays: None 29 Approved: 5 -0 30 Motion carried. 31 32 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #4977) 33 34 AGENDA ITEM #16, ZA96 -140, FINAL PLAT OF THE PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FIRST 35 AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC ADDITION: 36 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for 37 property legally described as approximately 0.971 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, 38 Abstract No. 686, and being a portion of Tract 1C3. The property is located on north side of West 39 Southlake Boulevard, approximately 750' west of the intersection of White Chapel Boulevard and 40 Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The Land Use Category is Mixed Use (may include office buildings, 41 hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs). The Corridor 42 Recommendation is Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C -1, C -2, C -3, and B -1 districts). The 43 current zoning is "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District. The applicant is Terry Wilkinson. The Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 10 of 13 owner is First American Savings Banc, S.S.B., Shareholder's Trust. The property is in SPIN 2 Neighborhood #10. There are no property owner notifications required on Final Plats. 3 4 Terry Wilkinson, 930 Parkview Lane, Southlake, Texas presented this item to the Commission and 5 is in agreement with all Staff Comments. 6 7 Motion was made to approve ZA96 -140, Final Plat of the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, First American 8 Savings Banc Addition, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated October 11, 1996 9 10 Motion: Creighton 11 Second: Schroetke 12 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 13 Nays: None 14 Approved: 5 -0 15 Motion carried. 16 17 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 1, section #5191) 18 19 Vice - Chairman Potter called for a recess at 9:46 p.m. 20 Vice - Chairman Potter called the meeting back to order at 10:00 p.m. 21 2 AGENDA ITEM #18, ORDINANCE NO. 480-W, REVISIONS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480: 24 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the first item is a revision on the 25 definition of kennel. There was a revision of the Animal Control Ordinance No. 530A earlier this 26 year where the definition of kennel was deleted and the Animal Control Ordinance No. 530A now 27 becomes the sole enforcement authority for controlling the number of domesticated animals in 28 residential settings. Ms. Gandy stated that what we are now calling a kennel is purely a commercial 29 operation so the Zoning Ordinance will be addressing kennels only in a commercial sense. The 30 proposal is to strike out the definition as it stands today and revise it to read: 31 32 "KENNEL -A commercial establishment (with indoor and/or outdoor pens and runs) in which 33 dogs, cats, or domesticated animals are housed, boarded, groomed, bred, trained, or sold all 34 for a fee or compensation." 35 36 Ms. Gandy stated that all requests would still need to appear before Planning and Zoning 37 Commission and City Council in the form of a Specific Use Permit after obtaining a "C -3 ", "C -4 ", 38 "B -2 ", or "I -1" zoning. 39 40 Ms. Gandy stated that the second issue that Ordinance No. 480 -W addresses is telecommunication 41 towers antennas and ancillary structures. The city has been allowing telecommunication towers, 42 antennas, and ancillary structures in the "CS" Community Service District, and Section 8.2 of the 43 Zoning Ordinance No. 480 is being amended to reflect that fact. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 11 of 13 Vice- Chairman Potter stated that he feels there should be a maximum height allowed on the 2 telecommunication towers, and Ms. Gandy responded that the Commission would determine that 3 on a case -by -case basis based on the coverage area and the elevation of the site. It would be the 4 applicant's responsibility to convince the Commission of the height needed for their tower. 5 6 Vice - Chairman Potter stated that he would like to see some criteria included to aid in evaluation, 7 possibly addressing buildings and height of towers. He said that maybe it should be in guideline 8 format. 9 10 Commissioner Edmondson asked if there is any landscape or bufferyard requirements in "CS" 11 Community Service District zoning. Ms. Gandy said that it depends on what is adjacent to the 12 particular site in question. 13 14 Commissioner Edmondson also asked if there might be any "perks" to the City of Southlake for 15 these towers. Ms. Gandy stated that if they are co- locating on public facilities such as water towers, 16 the City can obtain leasing fees. 17 18 Vice - Chairman Potter stated that he does not feel comfortable approving this item without specific 19 guidelines to follow. 20 21 Commissioner Edmondson asked Staff what type of studies or tests are referred to in Section 45.1 ? (38.a). Ms. Gandy said that those tests are used to determine the appropriate signal coverage of a particular site. Commissioner Edmondson said she would like to see more elaboration in that item. 24 Ms. Gandy stated that the City may need a consultant on retainer to assist in evaluations. 25 26 Commissioner Edmondson stated her concern about the vagueness of the criteria, and that it needs 27 more teeth. She also stated that it should be specified who maintains the landscaping, etc. in order 28 for it to be aesthetically pleasing. 29 30 Ms. Gandy asked if the Commission is in agreement that Section 34.3 be deleted in order to avoid 31 conflict in the Ordinance, and they agreed that it should be deleted. Ms. Gandy agreed to "beef -up" 32 Sections 2 and 5 after further discussions with the City Attorney. 33 34 Vice - Chairman Potter opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 35 36 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table Ordinance No. 480 -W, Revisions to the Zoning 37 Ordinance No. 480, and to continue the Public Hearing until the November 21, 1996 Regular 38 Planning and Zoning Meeting. 39 40 Motion: Creighton 41 Second: Tate 42 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 43 Nays: None Approved: 5 -0 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 12 of 13 • Motion carried. 2 3 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 2, section #822) 4 5 AGENDA ITEM #19, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 6 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 11:00 p.m. on October 17, 1996. 7 8 Motion: Edmondson 9 Second: Creighton 10 Ayes: Schroetke, Tate, Potter, Edmondson, Creighton 11 Nays: None 12 Approved: 5 -0 13 Motion carried. 14 15 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 17 -96, tape 2, section #882) 16 17 18 21 Rex ' 22 Vice - Chairman 25 26 ATTEST: 27 28 29 0 -- kucw-d,C 32 Lori A. Farwell 33 Community Development Secretary 34 35 36 L: \WP- FILES \MTG \MIN \1996 \10- 17- 96.WPD Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on October 17, 1996 Page 13 of 13