The URL can be used to link to this page

1996-02-22 P&Z Meeting City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 22,1996 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 8, 1996. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider: ZA95 -116, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR COMMERCE SQUARE, being approximately a 7.22 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A. Location: south of E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and immediately east of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" (Office), "I -1" (Light Industrial), and "B -1" (Business Service Park) uses. Owners: Steve and Sue Pritchett; Applicant: Pima Properties, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA95 -117, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (OUTSIDE STORAGE FOR MINI- WAREHOUSE STORAGE, OFFICE /SHOWROOM AND OUTSIDE STORAGE) FOR COMMERCE SQUARE, per Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (27), being approximately a 2.53 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A (Southern one - third). Location: south of F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) and immediately East of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" (Office), "I -1" (Light Industrial), and "B -1" (Business Service Park) uses. Owners: Steve and Sue Pritchett; Applicant: Pima Properties, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA95 -126, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR WHITE CHAPEL PLAZA, being 24.776 acre tract of land situated in the Little Berry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tract lA the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tracts 3C, 3L, 3M, and Lot 4, H. Granberry Addition No. 581. Location: on the southwest corner of North White Chapel Blvd. and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District, "0-1" Office District, and "CS" Community Service District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 2 "C -3" uses. Owners: Niley M. Church, Southlake Baptist Church, Inc., and Michael D. Vouklizas; Applicant: Ewing Properties. SPIN Neighborhood #14. 7. Consider: ZA95 -131, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WHITE CHAPEL PLAZA, Lots 1 -4, Block 1, being 24.776 acre tract of land situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tract 1A; the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tracts 3C, 3L, 3M; and Lot 4, H. Granberry Addition No. 581. Location: on the southwest corner of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District, "0-1" Office District, and "CS" Community Service District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C -3" uses. Owners: Niley M. Church, Southlake Baptist Church, Inc., and Michael D. Vouklizas; Applicant: Ewing Properties. SPIN Neighborhood # 10. Public Hearing 8. Consider: ZA96 -01, CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA, being legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Block 6, Diamond Circle Estates Second Installment as shown on the Plat recorded in Volume 388 -181, Page 69, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, situated in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687, and being approximately a 1.70 acre tract of land. Location: on the northeast corner at the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Frank Putt; Applicant: Crossroad Square, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing 9. Consider: ZA96 -02, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED BEER FOR OFF - PREMISE CONSUMPTION) FOR MAGIC MIKE'S TEXACO, per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) and 45.6 (a and b), being legally described as Lot 5, Block 6, Diamond Circle Estates Second Installment as shown on the Plat recorded in Volume 388 -181, Page 69, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, situated in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687, and being approximately a 0.94 acre tract of land. Location: at the northeast corner at the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Frank Putt; Applicant: Crossroad Square, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing 10. Consider: ZA96 -03, REZONING, being legally described as Tract 5 -R -1, The Glory Place Addition shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1626 , situated in the Hirman Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and being approximately a 11.17 acre tract of land. Location: 1111 S. White Chapel Blvd., and being on the east side of S. White Chapel Blvd. and approximately 900' north of the intersection of S. White City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 3 Chapel Blvd. and E. Continental Blvd. Current Zoning: "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District; Requested Zoning: "RE" Residential Estate. Owner /Applicant: Gary Hargett. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing 11. Consider: ZA96 -04, REVISED SITE PLAN FOR SCHLOTZSKY'S, on property being proposed as Lot 1, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 2B in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately a 0.83 acre tract of land. Location: north of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 800' east of Randol Mill Ave. Current Zoning: "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Schlotzsky's N.E., Inc.; Applicant: N. S. Associates. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing 12. Consider: ZA96 -06, SITE PLAN FOR VILLAGE CENTER, PHASE I (EAST), Lot 3, Block 1, being approximately a 13.07 acre tract of land situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 6, and being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat. Location: south and adjacent to E. Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114) and north and adjacent to E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). approximately 1000' west of Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District. Owner: James Farrar, et. al.; Applicant: Midland Development Group. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Public Hearing 13. Consider: ZA96 -11, FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW, PHASE I, being 24.098 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tracts 2B and 2C. Location: north side of East Continental Blvd. and approximately 250' East of Carlisle Lane. Current Zoning: "SF -20A" Single Family Residential District. Owner /Applicant: Vista Oaks Development, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #8. The plat proposes 39 residential lots and 3 common areas. 14. Consider: ZA96 -12, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW, PHASE II, being approximately 10.650 acres situated in the J. A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6B2 and 6B3. Location: north side of E. Continental Blvd. and approximately 1,100' east of Carlisle Lane. Current Zoning: "SF -20A" Single Family District. Owner: Robert F. McMurray; Applicant: Carter & Burgess, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #2. The plat proposes 17 residential lots and 1 common area. Public Hearing 15. Consider: ZA96 -13, ZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE GARDEN OFFICES, being approximately 5.734 acres situated in the L. G. Hall. Tract 3B2. Location: north side of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and approximately 800' City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 4 west of Shady Oaks Dr. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Owner: Harold Wayne Clowers, et al.; Applicant: David L. Ford. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing. 16. Consider: ZA96 -14, SITE PLAN FOR PRIMROSE SCHOOL, being approximately 1.7892 acres situated in the G. W. Main Survey, Abstract No. 1098, Tract 2E. Location: on the east side of S. Kimball Ave.. approximately 300' south of the intersection of S. Kimball Ave. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Frank Cangelosi; Applicant: Patrick Saucedo. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing 17. Consider: Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 16, 1996 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. / ` p TM S. dra L. LeGrand v /k"' City Secretary * ** 'tnnuuwn If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481 -5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. G:\WPF\MTG\AGN\1996\02-22-96.WPD COMMISSION MEETING REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING FEBRUARY 22, 1996 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright, Vice - Chairman Ernest Johnson; Members: Randy Arnold, Jim Murphy, and Arthur Hobbs COMMISSION ABSENT: none CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director Greg Last, Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, City Civil Engineer Shawn Poe, and Administrative Secretary Laurie Sheets The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:05 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made to approve the minutes of the February 8, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, amended the redline /strikeout version as follows: 1) page 4, item #13.b needs to placed in a different paragraph 2) page 18, replace the word "will" to "would be" , replace the word "on" to "in ", and add the word "Stage" after the word "Plan ". Motion: Johnson Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #0 -43) AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS No comments. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #44 -50) The next two agenda items were moved forward on the agenda due to the request to table from the Applicant. AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA95 -126, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR WHITE CHAPEL PLAZA Motion was made to table ZA95 -126, Rezoning and Concept Plan for White Chapel Plaza, to March 7, 1996, per the Applicant's request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 2 Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #51 -72) AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA95 -131, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WHITE CHAPEL PLAZA Motion was made to table ZA95 -131, Preliminary Plat for White Chapel Plaza, to March 7, 1996, and continue the public hearing per the Applicant's request. Motion: Arnold Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #73 -89) AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA96 -01, CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA Motion was made to withdraw ZA96 -01, Concept Plan for The Plaza, per the Applicant's request. Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #90 -110) AGENDA ITEM #9, ZA96 -02, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED BEER FOR OFF - PREMISE CONSUMPTION Motion was made to withdraw ZA96 -02, Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Packaged Beer for Off - Premise Consumption, per the Applicant's request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 3 Motion: Hobbs Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #111-127) AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA95 -116, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR COMMERCE SQUARE Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square, being 7.22 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A. The property is located South of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and immediately East of Crooked Lane. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, and the requested zoning is "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan with certain "0-1" Office District uses and all "I -1" Light Industrial District uses with certain exceptions: aluminum product fabrication, armature winding, blacksmithing or horse shoeing, broom manufacturing, creamery and dairy product process, egg storage, candling, sorting and grading, farrier, ice manufacturing and bulk ice storage, ornamental iron works, plastic fabrication, sheet metal shop, spray painting shop, sheet metal shop, spray painting shop, and store fixture manufacturing and sales. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /65 Ldn Contour. The Corridor Designation is Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C -1, C -2, C -3, and B -1 Districts). The Owners are Steve and Sue Pritchett, and the Applicant is Pima Properties, Inc. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Ten (10) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received two (2) written responses (1 in favor and 1 undecided) of the plan. On December 7, 1995, December 21, 1995, January 4, 1996, and February 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Applicant's request to table this item until tonight's meeting and continue the public hearing. Concept Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. David McMahan (Pima Properties), 1335 Hidden Glen, Southlake, Texas 76092, represented this item. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. McMahan if he was still going to apply for a separate Specific Use Permit for the office /apartment quarters for the caretaker of the mini - warehouse storage facility. Mr. McMahan confirmed that he was going too. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. McMahan if he had an opportunity to review the Staff Review Letter and if he had any comments that he would like to address. Mr. McMahan requested to delete PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 4 item #3 (Provide a 5' Bufferyard `A' along the full extent of the east property line.) starting from the mini - warehouse storage facility to the south property line. Commissioner Murphy commented that the staff review letter addressed the driveway issues and asked the Commission where are they in terms of agreement with the Applicant since this item has been an extensively discussed topic in the previous meeting. Chairman Wright confirmed that this has been a major issue, and that the driveway location presented is probably the best solution that the Commission and Applicant could come to an agreement upon. He asked the Commission if they were comfortable with this. Commission Murphy commented that since their has been a consensus on this, then they should forgive the Applicant on this requirement. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing Arnold Wieder (Timarron Resident), 130 Highland Oaks Court, Southlake, Texas 76092, requested the Applicant buffer the neighboring residents from the development. Chairman Wright commented that this topic has been discussed at previous meetings, and that the adjacent residential property owners within the 200' notification area had been notified and the Commission has not received any written or oral opposition responses. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commissioner Murphy pointed out that the current zoning is "I -1" Light Industrial. He believed that the requested zoning "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District with certain uses from the "0-1" Office District, "I -1" Light Industrial District, and "B -1" Business Service Park District is a more appropriate zoning district in this area taking into consideration the new development cases to the east (ZA95 -130, Site Plan for Anderson Profession Building) and west (ZA95 -106, Concept Plan for Liberty Bank, and ZA95 -103, Rezoning). Motion was made to approve ZA95 -116, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) amending item #3 (provide a 5' Bufferyard `A' along the full extent of the east property line) to state "approved as submitted on plan dated February 7, 1996" 2) deleting item #2 (provide driveway entrance locations in accordance with Driveway Ordinance No. 634). Motion: Hobbs Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 5 Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #127 -600) AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA95 -117, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR COMMERCE SQUARE (OUTSIDE CONTAINERS) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for a Specific Use Permit (outside storage for mini - warehouse storage, office /showroom and outside storage) for Commerce Square, being 2.53 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A (Southern one - third). The property is located South of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and immediately East of Crooked Lane. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, and the requested zoning is "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan with certain "0-1" Office District uses and all "I -1" Light Industrial District uses with certain exceptions. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /65 Ldn Contour. The Owners are Steve and Sue Pritchett, and the Applicant is Pima Properties, Inc. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Three (3) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written responses. On December 7, 1995, December 21, 1995, January 4, 1996, and February 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Applicant's request to table this item until tonight meeting and continue the public hearing. The Specific Use Permit will be for the southern portion of the property from the fenced boundary to the southern property line. Commissioner Hobbs asked Staff if this item had the same review letter as ZA95 -116, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square, or if there was an additional letter for the case. Director Greg Last stated that the two cases have the same staff review letter. David McMahan (Pima Properties), 1335 Hidden Glen, Southlake, Texas 76092, represented this item. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. McMahan if he could note the deletion of container storage on the plan. Mr. McMahan stated that he would comply. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -117, Specific Use Permit for Commerce Square for Outside Storage, subject to Plan Review No. 5 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 6 1) incorporating the prohibition of container storage on the plan. Motion: Johnson Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #601 -733) AGENDA ITEM #10, REZONING Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for Rezoning for a residential lot, legally described as Tract 5 -R -1, The Glory Place Addition shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1626 , situated in the Hirman Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and being approximately a 11.17 acre tract of land. The property is located at 1111 S. White Chapel Blvd., and being on the east side of S. White Chapel Blvd. and approximately 900' north of the intersection of S. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Continental Blvd. The current zoning is "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District, and the requested zoning is "RE" Residential Estate. The Land Use Category is Low Density. The Owner and Applicant of the property is Gary Hargett. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #10. Seventeen (17) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has two written responses in favor of the rezoning. It does meet the minimum 5 acre area requirement. On February 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved to table this item until tonight's meeting due to Resolution 95 -24 (case limitations); the Commission was unable to take action on this item. Mr. Hargett was not present at this time to represent this item. Chairman Wright recommended tabling discussion of this item until after the next agenda item is presented with the anticipation of the arrival of the Applicant. The Commission agreed upon this recommendation. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #733 -898) AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA96 -04, REVISED SITE PLAN SCHLOTZSKY'S Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Revised Site Plan for Schlotzsky's Restaurant, being proposed as Lot 1, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 2B in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately a 0.83 acre tract of land. The property is located north of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 800' east of the intersection of Randol Mill Ave and W. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 7 Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Owner of the property is Schlotzsky's N.E., Inc., and the request is being submitted by the Applicant, N.S. Associates. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #13. Five (5) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written responses. On February 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved to table this item until tonight's meeting due to Resolution 95 -24 (case limitations); the Commission was unable to take action on this item. The Applicant requested the following changes: reducing the building size (from 2,700 s.f. to 2,189 s.f.), changing the main entrance, changing the roof design and material (from metal standing seam to composition shingle). The circulation throughout the site is the same as previously. Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. B.J. Rosow (Schlotzsky's, Inc.), 5580 LBJFreeway, Dallas, Texas, represented this item. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Rosow to address item #4 (regarding articulation on the north side) in the staff review letter, and asked him to clarify what the north line on the plan represents. Mr. Rosow stated that the line represents the separation of the drive - through lane from the passing lane. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Rosow his reason for requesting a variance on the north side articulation requirement. Mr. Rosow stated that this articulation faced the back of the property away from W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). He added that the kitchen will be located in this vicinity. He requested a variance for the north side articulation requirement. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Rosow if he was aware that the ordinance requires this. Mr. Rosow stated that he was aware. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Staff if the City Council approved the articulation variation on the previous Site Plan (ZA95 -94). Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated that they had. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Rosow if had any other concerns to address regarding the staff review letter. Mr. Rosow stated that the only concern was with item #4 for the north side articulation. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Judy Looney (Princeton Park Resident), 1502 Coryell Court, Southlake, Texas 76092, asked about the bufferyard and landscaping requirements and requested this be displayed in a nice fashion. She expressed her concern that this development will resemble "Albertsons" across the street with wall - to -wall parking. Mr. Rosow commented that he appreciated the concern and stated that the development will have to meet all the City's requirements on landscaping, building set - backs, and parking. He presented and discussed the points of the outside elevation. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 8 Chairman Wright commented that a "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District gives the Commission and Council flexibility to negotiate requirements with the developer; however, this item is straight zoning ( "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District) which requires the Applicant to meet all the requirements set forth by the City, and the Commission and Council can not place additional requirements on the bufferyard except what is stated in the ordinance. Carolyn Morris (The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, requested the Applicant be more descriptive in the detail of the landscaping and provide more information on the parking and flow of traffic. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Staff to point out the width of the bufferyards, etc. Director Greg Last stated the following: 1) the Zoning Ordinance adopted by the City requires bufferyards on the perimeters of the property 2) the Applicant has provided the required 10' bufferyard with a 6' fence on the north property line which requires a certain number of canopy trees, accent trees, and shrubs based upon the length of the property 3) the Applicant has provided a bufferyard along the front of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) 4) the landscaping requirements are based upon the size of the building and are located in the parking areas adjacent to the building with additional canopy trees, accent trees, and shrubs; the Applicant has met this requirement of the ordinance Motion was made to approve ZA96 -04, Revised Site Plan for Schlotzsky's Restaurant, subject to Plan Review Letter No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) forgiving the north side articulation requirement in item #4 (provide horizontal and vertical articulation of the north, east, south, and west facades of the building). Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #899 -1315) Director Greg Last commented that he attempted to contact Gary Hargett by telephone but had no success. Chairman Wright called for a recess at 7:55 p.m. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 9 Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting at 8:03 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA96-03. REZONING (CONT.) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy asked the Commission if they would like for her to restate the case information. Chairman Wright commented that he thought it was not necessary, and called upon the Applicant to represent this item. Gary Hargett, 1111 S. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake Texas 76092, represented this item. He apologized for not being present when his item was presented, he anticipated a long delay taking into consideration the length of the last meeting. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Hargett why a small portion of land was zoned "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District. Mr. Hargett stated that he had worked out the details with Staff on this matter. He added that the reason for this reclassification is to build a new house and barn with the existing house. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that the smaller portion of land that is owned by his daughter and son -in -law is zoned "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District because it is less than five (5) acres. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA96 -03, Rezoning Request. Motion: Murphy Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA96 -06. SITE PLAN FOR VILLAGE CENTER, PHASE I (EAST) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Site Plan for Village Center, Phase I (East), Lot 3, Block 1, being approximately a 13.07 acre tract of land situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 6, and being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat. The property is located south and adjacent to E. Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114) and north and adjacent to E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1000' west of Kimball Ave. The current zoning is "C- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 10 3" General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /65 Ldn Contour in the Airport Overlay Zone. The Corridor Designation is Village Center. The property Owner is James Farrar, et. al., and the request is being submitted by the Applicant, Midland Development Group. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #4. Eight (8) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has one (1) written response in favor of the plan. On February 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved to table this item until tonight's meeting due to Resolution 95 -24 (case limitations); the Commission was unable to take action on this item. Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Staff if item #9a (As proposed, the facade finish materials are synthetic stucco and decorative block. Ordinance 480 -S allow decorative block provided that "...the use of standard concrete block shall be limited to 10% of any facade visible from adjacent public right -of- way." Ordinance 480 -S also allows synthetic stucco provided that it is of "...equal or greater strength and durability specifications" compared to a 3 -step plaster process over diamond metal lath mesh to 7 /8th inch thickness.) in the staff review letter was a problem or informational comment. Director Greg Last stated that the Applicant has brought an architect tonight to explain the details. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Staff about item #9b (Correct the front south facade of Building "B" shown on Sheet A3.4. The cross - section plan view does not correspond to the elevation used to demonstrate the vertical articulation.) in the staff review letter. Director Greg Last stated that the articulation was calculated on elevations provided. He added that the Applicant will explain in more detail. Don Silverman (Midland Development Group), 15935 Century Forest Circle, Dallas, Texas 76020, Joe Patti (Good, Fulton, and Farrell), 3102 Oaklawn, Dallas, Texas 75219, and Barry Hudson (JBM Engineers and Planners), 2630 W. Freeway, Suite 100, Fort Worth, Texas 76020, represented this item. Mr. Silverman commented that he did not have an opportunity to review item #8 (Traffic Impact Analysis) on the staff review letter. Director Greg Last commented that the City Engineering Staff has been in correspondence with their engineering staff. He added that the outcome of their analysis is that the short-term basis will have no affect. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Staff their preference on how to address this issue. Director Greg Last recommended that if the Commission desired to approve this agenda item, then it should be addressed on item #8 in the motion. Mr. Silverman commented on the following items that addressed item #9a (facade finish materials) on the staff review letter: 1) proposed synthetic stucco will be on portions of the building that will cover standard block construction with decorative block/split -face PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 11 2) requested a variance to allow synthetic stucco on tilt -up construction buildings (Ca, Cb, and Cc) 3) the building construction has greater strength with the synthetic stucco then the straight stucco. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Silverman if the synthetic stucco will be directly applied to the standard block. Mr. Patti stated that the material will be applied directly over the block. He added that the mortar will not seep into the finish. Chairman Wright asked Staff the difference between decorative block and standard block. Director Greg Last stated it is differentiated in the ordinance. Chairman Wright also asked Mr. Silverman what percentage of the building will be visible of the standard block material. Mr. Silverman stated that there will be 0 %. Vice - Chairman Johnson stated that tilt wall is prohibited in the Corridor Overlay Zone. Chairman Wright commented that tilt wall will not be visible because it will be covered. He added that it will be built on concrete block which will provide strength. Commissioner Hobbs asked Mr. Silverman if the synthetic stucco will cover both the tilt wall and the standard block. Mr. Silverman stated that this was correct. He added that there are building codes for synthetic stucco which are similar to SMT standards. Mr. Patti commented on the following proposed building composition: 1) the buildings will have concrete panels (12" block walls with studs and sheeting) 2) the stucco will not be applied low to the ground, foreseeing being struck with a car or a shopping cart 3) the rear wall is tilt wall covered by synthetic stucco. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Patti if any of the walls were weight - bearing. Mr. Patti stated that there are none. Mr. Patti commented that they are trying to meet the articulation requirements in item #9b (correct the front (south) facade of building `B "). He added the following comments pertaining to item #9c for Building "A ": 1) the south facade will have three elevations with the canopy having a different height from the main building a. it will not have a flat facade do to its having four planes b. the staff comment will affect the articulation of the building 2) the docks on the north facade will be varied in height 3) the east facade will be set adjacent to another building and it might be altered after working with a tenant 4) west facade is trying to break the mass of the building a. blocks of different texture and color will be used 1. colors will be picked at the site due to the lighting effects b. the 4 ft. inset panels (blind windows) will be regular masonry with decorative tile above PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 12 1. the color is not decided, it might have a burnished, polished, look 2. the starting point of the panels is 2 ft. from the ground 5) there will be treatment wraps around the building 6) the building will have heavy cornice at the top of building with lintels 7) the entrances and exits will be clearly designated according to the requirements set forth by ADA. Chairman Wright commented that the inset panels resemble garage doors and asked Mr. Patti if they could be raised. Mr. Patti stated that, after the building materials are in place, it will not resemble garage doors. Commissioner Hobbs commented that, because the inset panels are square- shaped, is the reason for the similarity. Mr. Silverman commented that he will work with the architect and City Staff on this matter, and he will try to redesign the inset panels to resemble more like a window design than a door design. He added that there will be landscaping and no driveways. He requested the Site Plan go to City Council and the inset panels will be redesigned for the City Council's review. Mr. Silverman commented that he will request a building height variance on Building `B" with the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Scott Martin (SPIN Representative #4), 591 E. Dove St., Southlake, Texas 76092, is in favor. He has had numerous conversations with Mr. Silverman. He added that Mr. Silverman did a presentation for the SPIN Quarterly Meeting. Sharon Richardson (The Dominion Resident), 400 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, commented that the building looks beautiful. She asked the Commission if there are certain restrictions on grocery stores regarding outside storage (the sale of barbecue grills, firewood, etc.) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated that retail stores can have 5% of store area in outside storage, and that there are restrictions that are applied to the type of merchandise. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Vice - Chairman Johnson commented that the Applicant is trying to meet the intent of articulation requirement. The Commission wanted it to be noted that there will be tilt wall under the synthetic stucco. Motion was made to approve ZA96 -06, Site Plan for Village Center, Phase I (East), subject to Plan Review Letter No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 13 1) deleting item #9A (facade finish materials) 2) accepting articulation as presented tonight 3) noting west wall of Kroger will have additional landscaping Motion: Johnson Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. Chairman Wright stepped down and Vice - Chairman Johnson presided on the next two agenda items. AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA96 -11, FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW. PHASE I Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Final Plat for South Hollow, Phase I, being 24.098 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tracts 2B and 2C. The property is located north side of East Continental Blvd. and approximately 250' East of Carlisle Lane. The current zoning is "SF -20A" Single Family Residential District. The request is being made by the Owner and Applicant, Vista Oaks Development, Ltd. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #8. No written notices were required to be sent to property owners due to this item being a Final Plat. The plat proposes 39 residential lots and 3 common areas. Staff finds that the Final Plat substantially conforms to the previously approved Preliminary Plat. Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. Paul McCracken (Carter & Burgess, Inc.), 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, Texas 75247, represented this item. He commented on the following items: 1) item #6 (Lot 23, Block 1 does not meet the 100' lot width at the building line.) has been corrected 2) the Planning and Zoning Commission accepted the requirement item #8 (It appears that Council's approval of the Preliminary Plat required a 30' building line in Lot 3, Block 2 along Continental Blvd. and in Lot 10, Block 2 along Pine Meadow Way.); however, City Council did not approve it 3) at this time, item #10 (Our records indicate the existence of Diamond Shamrock right -of -way or easement along or adjoining the east line of this site. Show the location and label the owner, type easement, width and county records volume and page if this easement exists.) cannot be found; however, they are working with Diamond Shamrock to get the locations of the easement and the pipeline. He added that they will be noted on the plan. Motion was made to approve ZA96 -1 Final Plat for South Hollow, Phase I, subject to Plat Review Letter No. 1 dated February 16, 1996 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 14 Motion: Murphy Second: Arnold Ayes: Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Abstained: Wright Approved: 4 -0 -1 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #3377 -3474) AGENDA ITEM #14. ZA96 -12, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW, PHASE II Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Preliminary Plat for South Hollow, Phase II, being approximately 10.650 acres situated in the J. A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6B2 and 6B3. The property is located north side of E. Continental Blvd. and approximately 1,100' east of Carlisle Lane. The current zoning is "SF -20A" Single Family District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The property Owner is Robert F. McMurray, and the request is being made by the Applicant, Carter & Burgess, Inc. Eight (8) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has one (1) written response in favor of the plan. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #2. The plat proposes 17 residential lots and 1 common area. Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. This will be a companion piece for Phase II for the South Hollow Project. Commissioner Hobbs asked Staff if the project met the curvilinear requirements. Director Greg Last stated that the cul -de -sac length limit falls between Lots 2, 3, 12, and 13. He added that the lots that qualified were Lots 3 through Lot 12. Paul McCracken (Carter & Burgess, Inc.), 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, Texas 75247, represented this item. He requested to delete item #7 (A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages of Lots 1 and 14, Block 2.) due to the lots being back -to -back lots, and would like a variance on the reduced side yard setback line. Vice - Chairman Johnson opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Vice - Chairman Johnson closed the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA96 -12, Preliminary Plat for South Hollow, Phase II, subject to Plat Review Letter No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 15 1) allowing the 15 ft. building line on item #7 (building setback line) as proposed on plan. Motion: Arnold Second: Hobbs Ayes: Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Abstained: Wright Approved: 4 -0 -1 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #3475 -3650) AGENDA ITEM #15, ZA96 -13, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE GARDEN OFFICES Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant provided a two page introductory memorandum dated February 22, 1996, addressing the staff review letter's comments. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Southlake Garden Offices, being approximately 5.734 acres situated in the L. G. Hall, Tract 3B2. The property is located north side of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and approximately 800' west of Shady Oaks Dr. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, and the requested zoning is "0-1" Office District. The Corridor Designation is Residential. The property Owner is Harold Wayne Clowers, et al., and the request is being made by the Applicant, David L. Ford. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #13. Eight (8) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received five (5), 3 opposed and 2 in favor, written responses within the area and six (6) written responses outside the area opposed of the plan. There will be a single point of access to the site. The maximum building height will be 18 ft. The parking lot area is located within the project rather than on the exterior of the project. Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. David Ford, 536 Indian Creek, Trophy Club, Texas, represented this item. He commented on the following items: 1) item #4 (Due to the adjacency of this site to properties designated as low density residential on the north, east, and west, all structures which did not exceed 20' in height shall provide a minimum setback of 40'. All structures exceeding 20' in height shall not encroach a 4:1 slope line from the north, east, and west property lines.) on the staff letter is addressed in the memorandum dated February 22, 1996 2) item #5 (Note the distance to the nearest right -of -way intersection, and /or driveway entrance centerline, in both directions, from the proposed driveway entrance centerline per the Driveway PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 16 Ordinance No. 634. It appears from the number of parking spaces shown and from the single point of access proposed that the minimum driveway throat depth should be increased to 150'.) is addressed in the memorandum dated February 22, 1996 3) the proposal is for single story buildings which will be constructed of 100% brick with cast stone trim around the windows, etc. 4) the plan resembles residential property to make it more compatible to the existing homes in the area. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. Ford about item #4 (4:1 slope line) in the staff review letter. Mr. Ford requested a variance on this comment for it would alter the parking location. He added that he would have to relocate his parking to the outside perimeters of the complex and by doing this, it would resemble that of a strip center. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Dennis McGrath, 2403 Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and commented that the City's Land Use Plan had many invested hours of planning. He added that the Land Use Plan designated this area to be residential and requested it be developed this way. He is opposed and requested it be denied. Gary Hargett, 1111 S. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and requested the Commission and City Council take a stand and take into consideration the adopted Land Use Plan and Current Zoning District. He asked if the area could be preserved to its present zoning district and land use designation. Carolyn Morris (The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and requested the Commission keep controls tight. She recommended putting this high density use in a different location. R. J. Stacy, 320 N. Shady Oaks Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and commented that his side property line adjoins the back of this property. He added that there will be to many dumpsters which will bring in noisy trash trucks. He requested the present zoning district be kept. Ross Owens, 480 Shady Oaks Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and commented that his father owned property to the west. He added that this area is a showplace and requested it remain low density. Randy Stacy, 300 N. Shady Oaks Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and commented on the following: 1) that his property and surrounding properties are zoned agricultural, and asked if his property PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 17 needed to be rezoned to protect it 2) requested the Commission enforce the Land Use Plan 3) the two people in favor of the plan are adjacent to the proposed developing in hoping to sell their property as commercial 4) the ten office buildings will have 50 different offices 5) agenda item #6, ZA95 -126, Rezoning and Concept Plan for White Chapel Plaza, is already partially zoned "0-1" Office District as well as other pieces of property located throughout the City and requested the Applicant look in that direction. Dorothy Owens, 480 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed and commented on the following: 1) they own Tract 3A and the adjoining properties are owned by her family and the Stacy's family 2) their children and grandchildren are allowed to roam freely around this area and she does not like this development to be adjacent to her property 3) this takes away their security because the view would be blocked 4) the Love Henry Area is buffered from the Food Lion Grocery Store, and this development does not provide a buffer to the area. Harold Wayne Clowers, et. al., is in favor and commented that this plan is the best that they have seen. He added that the planning of this development provides its own buffering which keeps all the activity in the middle of the development. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. The Commission could not support this due to the Land Use Plan. Motion was made to deny ZA96 -13, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Southlake Garden Offices. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried Director Greg Last stated that this item will go forward to City Council on March 5, 1996, with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation for denial. He added that the audience could address this issue before City Council with some of their concerns. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #3652 -4951) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 18 AGENDA ITEM #16, ZA96 -14, SITE PLAN FOR PRIMROSE SCHOOL Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Site Plan for Primrose School, being approximately 1.7892 acres situated in the G. W. Main Survey, Abstract No. 1098, Tract 2E. The property is located on the east side of S. Kimball Ave., approximately 300' south of the intersection of S. Kimball Ave. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /75 Ldn Contour. The Corridor Designation is Retail Commercial. The property Owner is Frank Cangelosi, and the request is being submitted by the Applicant, Patrick Saucedo. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Five (5) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one (1) written response in favor of the plan. Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated February 16, 1996, was provided to the Commission in the packet. Staff requested to amend item #14 regarding building articulation. Director Greg Last commented that the facades are within 400' of a residential area taking into consideration their visibility to E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709); therefore, all facades will have to meet building articulation requirements set forth in the Corridor Overlay Zone. He added that Staff cannot determine if the Applicant has met the facade requirements because the lack of material presented to them. Frank Cangelosi (Cangelosi Enterprises), 305 W. Chapel Downs, Southlake, Texas 76092, and Patrick Saucedo (A.I.G., Inc.), 1521 N. Cooper, Arlington, Texas 76011, represented this item. Mr. Cangelosi commented on the following items: 1) requested a variance on item #14a (Verify the visibility of the north, east, and west facades of the building from E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Provide vertical and horizontal articulation in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance 480 -S, Section 43.c.1.c. for building facades visible from F.M. 1709 and the south facade which is within 400' of a residentially zoned property.) 2) requested to go forward with the plan presented tonight because the facades are designed to meet the state requirements. Thus, it will hinder the integrity of the project. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Cangelosi if he was aware of the articulation requirements. Mr. Cangelosi stated that he was not aware of the requirements; however, he still does not want to comply. Mr. Saucedo commented on the following items: 1) A.I.G., Inc. has been the architect for Primrose School for the past three (3) years 2) the north elevation was provided to the Staff 3) requested a variance on the north and east elevations taking into consideration that safety is the essential factor in this request 4) the plan has evolved out of ten (10) years of designing schools. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 19 Vice - Chairman Johnson commented that he could not support this without the Applicant providing all the elevation information. Mr. Saucedo commented that they will comply with all of the comments on the staff review letter except for item #14a and requested to go forward with the plan as submitted. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Jim Makins, 2220 Airport Freeway, Bedford, Texas, 76022, is in favor and commented on the following: 1) representing owners to the north of the development (Royal Properties) 2) the development of this use is needed for Southlake 3) discussed with Janice Young (adjacent property owner to the south); she stated that her only objection is that she requested a fence along the development's south property line. Mr. Cangelosi commented that they would comply with item # 14a on the staff review letter. Vice - Chairman Johnson commented that in normal circumstances the Staff is provided with all the building dimensions, exhibits, etc. He asked Staff if they thought the Applicant would be in compliance with the Corridor Overlay Zone and Zoning Ordinance requirements. Director Greg Last stated that there are not vertical dimensions to the plan; hence, the building height cannot be determined. He added that the two elevations that are presented come close to meeting the articulation requirements. He recommended that if the Commission is comfortable with conditional approval, that the Applicant provides all elevation dimensions prior to the City Council Meeting. Chairman Wright commented that he likes the plan and is in favor of the plan; however, he is opposed at this time due to the Applicant not providing articulation dimensions. Commissioner Hobbs commented that there is a need for the requirement for it would serve justice to anyone that comes forward now or in the past. He added that this requirement has been enforced in the past, and this requirement should be applied to everyone fairly. Chairman Wright commented that the Commission does not know at this point if, after applying all the elevations, there might arise another issue or some of the items could be waived. Mr. Saucedo commented that all the dimensions are on the large scale blueprint; however, he stated that Staff informed him that full -size elevations were required. Mr. Cangelosi requested to table this until the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 7, 1996. Director Greg Last commented that the Applicant needs to resubmit new bluelines by 5:00 p.m. on PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1996 PAGE 20 Monday, February 26, 1996. Motion was made to table ZA96 -14, Site Plan for Primrose School, and continue the public hearing till March 7, 1996. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #4953 -5987) AGENDA ITEM #17, ADJOURNMENT Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:05 p.m. on Thursday, February 22, 1996. Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 02- 22 -96, tape 1, section #5993 -6001) Joe Wrig t Chairman ATTEST: ■ 11./ ie Sheets Secretary G:\WPF\MTG\MIN\1996\02-22-96.WPD THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF 44.An_a,t 1 1 1 I & as a member of the //ti- r/ :11L • make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and/or a person or persons rAted to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote or decision of the 1- //6 -/) G o ' -42- as those terms are defined in Chapter 171, Texas Loca,Governm l 3 The business entity is , d � � 14)9 Atd-e name) (address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever. G / Signed this day of -f/i/J 1�_r -), 00 Signature of Official Title BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared 91a-- on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of,4��(,.2 nowledge or belief. Ir to before me on this a�. da of i , 19 W . Sworn to and subscribed y d �� aRY pU�� LAURIE gTE OF M. S ` ■ , j�� * Not Public l9 o t �� P S ST TEXA MY CommExp10 /99 ; N 4a4:7)2 ublic in and f e State of Texas Type/Print Notary's Name My Commission Expires: • G:\ W PF\FORMS\AFFID. FRM