Loading...
1995-10-19 P&Z Meeting City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of October 5, 1995. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider: ZA95 -101, Site Plan for R.S.U. Building Addition, being Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Hills R.S.U. Addition. Location: North side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1300' West of White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District. Owner /Applicant: GTE Southwest Incorporated. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA95 -103, Rezoning for 0.112 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, Tract 6C, and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tract 2C1. Location: Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District Requested Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District. Owner: Royal Properties; Applicant: Hodges & Associates. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA95 -104, Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball, being 1.9801 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, Tracts 6, 6B, and 6C; and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tracts 2B, 2C, and 2C1. Location: Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District and "AG" Agricultural District. Owner: Royal Properties; Applicant: Hodges & Associates. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA95 -92, Development Plan for Solana, Phase I, being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, 3A4A, and 3A4B City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 2 and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: "C -3, CS, and P.U.D" Districts; Requested Zoning: "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner: MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. Spin Neighborhood #2. This plan proposes 70 residential lots. Continue Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA95 -93, Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I, being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, 3A4A, and 3A4B and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St.. and West of North White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: "C -3, CS, P.U.D." Districts; Requested Zoning: "R- P.U.D.," Residential Planned Unit Development (currently under consideration). Owner: MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. Spin Neighborhood #2. This plat proposes 72 residential lots. Continue Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA95 -99, Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, being 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2. Location: 1835 N. Peytonville Ave (on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural; Requested Zoning: "SF -1A" Single - Family Residential District. Owners /Applicants: Carleo and Regina Capili. SPIN Neighborhood #11. Continue Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA95 -77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, being 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park. Location: 280 Commerce Street, approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "I -1" Light Industrial District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I -1" Light Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 and the retail sale of furniture. Owner /Applicant: James R. Stacy d/b /a Stacy Furniture Warehouse. Spin Neighborhood #7. Continue Public Hearing. City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 3 11. Consider: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance 483 -D. Continue Public Hearing. 12. Consider: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance 483 -E regarding private streets. Continue Public Hearing. 13. Consider: Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -T to consider permitting outside storage in certain commercial districts and revising the regulations for satellite dishes. Public Hearing. 14. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, October 13, 1995 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. lone" o -\ . rai Kim : sh a i Acti - g City Secretary +� * ** If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481 -5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. G: \WPF \MTG\AGN\ 10- 19 -95. WPD REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 19,1995 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice - Chairman Ernest Johnson; Members: Randy Arnold, James Murphy, Arthur Hobbs, Rex Potter, and Dona Schroetke COMMISSION ABSENT: none CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director Greg Last, Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, Planner Tom Elgin, Engineer Ron Harper, and Secretary Laurie Sheets The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:06 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made to approve the minutes of the October 5, 1995 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting as amended: 1) relocating the first paragraph on page one under agenda item #3, Administrative Comments, to agenda item #6, Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 -D, 2) adding Vice - Chairman Johnson's comment to the second paragraph on page one "not to revise the ordinance until the next review of the Land Use Plan", and 3) revising the last sentence in the seventh paragraph on page three from "He did not provide the Staff with the proper mailing address." to "It was determined that a proper mailing address was not provided." Motion: Hobbs Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Abstained: Murphy Approved: 6 -0 -1 Motion carried. Abstaining Commissioner Murphy was not present at the October 5, 1995 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #0 -46) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 2 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS Director Greg Last discussed the following items: 1) the agenda for the Committee Meeting on October 23, 1995 that will study the feasibility of splitting the Planning and Zoning Commission into two commissions, 2) scheduling a joint work session between the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance No. 480 -Q and general development controls, Vice - Chairman Johnson requested clarification of the topics that will be discussed at the work session to assure adequate time preparation. Director Greg Last commented that members of the development community who attended the Quarterly Developers' Round Table Meeting requested the opportunity to discuss the most recent development controls at the work session. 3) the Corridor Study has been submitted to the printers for publication and will be available at the next meeting, and 4) the City Council Minutes for October 3, 1995 are not available at this time. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #46 -133) AGENDA ITEM #4. ZA95 -101, SITE PLAN FOR R.S.U. BUILDING ADDITION Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Site Plan for R.S.U. Building Addition, being Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Hills R.S.U. Addition. The property is located on the north side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1300' West of White Chapel Blvd. The current zoning is "CS" Community Service District. The Land Use Category is Public /Semi - Public. The Owner and Applicant is GTE Southwest Incorporated. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood is #10. Five (5) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written responses. The facility proposes it to be "unmanned" with two parking spaces for the building. The purpose of the facility is to house telephone switching equipment. James Sellers (Darrow, McSpedden, Sellers, AIA), 3115 Loop 305, Suite 100, San Angelo, Texas 76904, and Mark Houston (G. T. E. Southwest, Inc. - Land & Building Division), 500 East Carpenter, Irving, Texas 75062, represented this item. Mr. Sellers stated the following REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 3 comments: 1) providing additional telephone service to the area will require telephone equipment, 2) proposing to add a 500 square feet building adjacent to the existing building, making the total size of the building to be approximately 1,000 square feet, and 3) asking for a variance on the front bufferyard requirement which would allow the parking area at its present location. He stated that at the time of the construction of the existing building, the bufferyard requirement was 10'; however, at the present time, the bufferyard requirement is 20' which is stated in item #6 on the staff review letter dated October 13, 1995. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to clarify the bufferyard requirement, with regard to the existing building and the adopted Corridor Overlay Zone requirements. Director Greg Last commented that the only bufferyard that is affected by the Corridor Overlay Zone is the front bufferyard with the new expansion to the existing building; thus, the front bufferyard will need to be 20'. Commissioner Potter asked if the Applicant will need to comply with the bufferyard planting calculations requirement in item #6 on the staff review letter. Mr. Sellers agreed that the bufferyard planting requirements will be meet. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Vice - Chairman Johnson recommended to forgive the parking intrusion in the front bufferyard. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -101, Site Plan for R.S.U. Building Addition, subject to the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995, amended as follows: 1) allowing the existing parking area in the bufferyard in response to item #6. Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 4 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #134 -437) AGENDA ITEM #5. ZA95 -103, REZONING Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Rezoning for 0.112 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, Tract 6C, and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tract 2C1. The property is located at the Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, and the requested zoning is "C -3" General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Owner is Royal Properties, and the Applicant is Hodges & Associates. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Six (6) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one (1) written response in favor of the rezoning. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to brief the Commission on the surrounding zoning. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated the following surrounding property zoning districts: 1) immediate south is "C -2" Local Retail Commercial, 2) immediate east is "C -3" General Commercial, 3) immediate west, across South Kimball Avenue is "CS" Community Service, 4) southwest, across South Kimball Avenue is "AG" Agricultural (3 acre tract), and 5) north and northwest, across F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) is "C -3" General Commercial. She stated that the bulk of the surrounding zoning is comprised of the "C -3" General Commercial District. Gary DeVleer (Hodges & Associates), 13642 Omega Road, Dallas, Texas 75244, represented this item. He stated the following comments: 1) the property is abandoned Kimball right -of -way, 2) it will be incorporated in the proposed development in agenda item #4, Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 5 No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. No discussion from the Commission. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -103, Rezoning from an "AG" Agricultural District to "C -3" General Commercial District. Motion: Potter Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #437 -563) AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA95 -104, SITE PLAN FOR THE SOUTHLAKE CENTER AT KIMBALL Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball, being 1.9801 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, Tracts 6, 6B, and 6C; and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tracts 2B, 2C, and 2C1. The property is located at the Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C -3" General Commercial District and "AG" Agricultural District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use and is within the 75 LDN Contour. The Owner is Royal Properties, and the Applicant is Hodges & Associates. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one (1) written response in favor of the Site Plan. The previous agenda item #5, Rezoning, will be added to the Site Plan. There will be a driveway entrance that will be shared by the two proposed sites (retail and restaurant) and a driveway entrance to the south for access to Kimball Avenue. Staff submitted Plan Review Letter Revised No. 1 dated October 17, 1995. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to clarify item #15 (articulation requirements) of the staff review letter. Director Greg Last commented that the Applicant needs to submit all of the elevations of the proposed buildings. Planner Tom Elgin added that the elevations are needed for the Staff to determine the vertical articulation. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 6 Gary DeVleer (Hodges & Associates), 13642 Omega Road, Dallas, Texas 75244, represented this item. He stated the following comments: 1) the "2 acre tract" will be subdivided, 2) a Burger King will buy 35,000' square feet at the northwest corner, 3) both tracts will utilize the same driveway entrance onto F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard), 4) common access easements at the adjoining property lines will be platted for future buildings, 5) east and west side elevations on the retail building have a length, less than three times the height, 6) east side of the restaurant site does not meet the articulation requirement due to the continuous canopy for weather protection. This side is adjacent to a heavy landscaped buffer, and Mr. DeVleer requested the Commission allow this elevation to remain without meeting the articulation requirement because it is Burger King's Corporate Plan. 7) a directional turn island has been incorporated in the driveway entrance to prohibit a "left turn out movement" onto F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). This should prevent any problems for the driveway being less than 500' from the east line of Kimball Avenue ( #14C on the staff review letter). Tony Trammel (Deshazo & Tang, Associates) 400 South Houston, Suite 330, Dallas, Texas 75202, represented the Applicant as Traffic Engineer. He stated that the plan called for joint access between two properties which will minimize the traffic movement. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Trammel the direction of the drive -thru. Mr. Trammel stated that it is proposed to go south to north towards F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). Mr. DeVleer stated that there is a continuous left lane from F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) to S. Kimball Avenue. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. DeVleer if the plan proposed to limit access from the north, and if so, how will the traffic from the north get to the drive -thru. Mr. DeVleer commented the circle around the front of the building will provide access to the drive -thru. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Trammel if the eastbound traffic will enter the development with the right turn. Mr. Trammel commented that the traffic can use the right deceleration lane. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 7 Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Trammel if the eastbound traffic will enter the development with the right turn. Mr. Trammel commented that the traffic can use the right deceleration lane. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff the purpose of the Texas Department of Transportation for building the right deceleration lane. Director Greg Last commented that the construction of the deceleration lane was established for a transition to allow a moving lane of traffic in the future. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff about page 4, first paragraph on the staff review letter regarding the landscaping details. Director Greg Last commented that the landscaping details will not be shown on the Site Plan; however, prior to issuing a building permit, they will provide a landscape plan. Commissioner Hobbs asked Mr. DeVleer the location and screening of the air conditioning units with regard to item #15 (articulation requirements of Ordinance No. 480 -S) of the staff review letter. Mr. DeVleer commented that the height of the building is 20' at its lowest point. There will be a continuous parapet around three sides of the building which will screen any mechanical device. Commissioner Hobbs asked him if any mechanical devices could be seen from F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). Mr. DeVleer commented that no such devices will be visual. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. DeVleer which elevation is not screened. Mr. DeVleer commented that the rear will not be screened. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. DeVleer if any mechanical device could be seen traveling north on Kimball Avenue. Mr. DeVleer commented the property to the south is not currently developed, and he does not how it will develop. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to clarify screening requirements as stated in the Corridor Overlay Zone. Director Greg Last commented that all buildings shall be designed such that no mechanical equipment or satellites shall be visible from S.H. No. 114 (Northwest Parkway), Carroll Avenue, F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard), etc. and adjacent right -of -way and or property within 400' of a tract zoned residential. He recommended that any mechanical equipment should be screened so that it is not visible from South Kimball Avenue to comply with the Corridor Overlay Zone. Mr. DeVleer stated that they will comply with this requirement. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. DeVleer if had read the revised staff review letter dated October 17, 1995 and asked him if had any problem with item #7 (dimension the depth of each building). Mr. DeVleer confirmed that he did and stated item #7 will be addressed. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff if the retail building's dimensions on the east and west sides meet the articulation requirements. Planner Tom Elgin stated that the height of the retail building is not stated; therefore, it can not be decided at this time. Furthermore, the Applicant will need to meet articulation requirements unless he requests a variance on this requirement. Planner Tom Elgin stated to the Commission that item #14C (the driveway spacing requirement) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 8 needs to be addressed; apparently, the Applicant is asking for a variance from the 500' requirement on the driveway entrance on F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). He stated that the Applicant is proposing a right - in/right -out and left-in drive which allows left -in turns across the eastbound lanes of F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). Chairman Wright stated that there is some protection from the signal light at the intersection of Kimball Avenue and F.M. 1709. Commissioner Hobbs recommended to move the driveway entrance on F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) further east. Mr. DeVleer commented that the driveway entrance has been planned as far east as feasible with not interfering in relocating the storm sewer inlet in F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. DeVleer if the retail development had any tenants. Mr. DeVleer stated that there is not any at the present time. Due to the relative high elevation of the property, Commissioner Schroetke noted the grade differential of F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) and the property. Mr. DeVleer commented that the grade will be lowered eight to ten feet, "taking down the high spots." Commissioner Hobbs stated the grade elevation is 15'. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commissioner Potter stated that he had a concern with the driveway entrance being only 160 feet from the signal light in relation to the traffic flow on F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard). Motion was made to approve ZA95 -104, Site Plan for the Southlake Center at Kimball, subject to amending the Plan Review Letter Revised No. 1 dated October 17, 1995 as follows: 1) deleting item #14C (The driveway entrance on Southlake Boulevard does not meet the Driveway Ordinance requirement of 500' minimum distance from the east line of Kimball Avenue.) 2) amending item #15 (deleting the east side restaurant site articulation requirement). Motion: Murphy Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Arnold, and Murphy Nays: Johnson, Schroetke, Potter, and Hobbs Approved: 3 -4 Motion failed. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 9 Motion was made to approve ZA95 -104, Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball, subject to the Plan Review Letter Revised No. 1 dated October 17, 1995, as amended as follows: 1) specifying in item #14C to have the driveway onto F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) designated as "right -in" and "right -out" 2) deleting the vertical and horizontal articulation requirement on the east side of the restaurant site in item #15. Motion: Johnson Second: Potter Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #564 -1799) Vice - Chairman Johnson stepped down on the next two agenda items, #7 (Development Plan for Solana, Phase I) and #8 (Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I). AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA95 -92, DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SOLANA, PHASE I Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Development Plan for Solana, Phase I, being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, 3A4A, and 3A4B and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. The property is located Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. The current zoning is "C- 3, CS, and P.U.D" Districts, and the requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /100 Year Flood Plain. The Owner is MTP- IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture, and the Applicant is Maguire Thomas Partners. The property is located in Spin Neighborhood #2. This plan proposes 70 residential lots. Ten (10) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received two (2) written responses in favor of the Plan. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff to expand on item #2 (provide the net acreage of the project and provide an area break down of public park dedication open space and private open space) in the Plan Review Letter No. 1 October 13, 1995. Director Greg Last commented that the Applicant will need to show net acreage for this project which will be the net of the dedication REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 10 for the right -of -way on White Chapel Road. Richard Kuhlman (Maguire Thomas Partners), Ocie Vest (Bury & Pittman D.F. W., Inc.), Chris Miller (S. W.A. Architects) and Rex Whitton (Vice- President of Maguire Thomas Partners), Nine Village Circle, Suite 500, Westlake, Texas 76262, represented this item. Mr. Kuhlman stated the following comments: 1) various lot sizes: a) 15,072 square feet (smallest of the lots), b) 57,738 square feet (largest of the lots, equivalent to 1.33 acres), c) 23,198 square feet (average lot size), and d) 33 out of the 70 lots (equivalent to 0.50 acres). Chairman Wright asked Mr. Kuhlman if the lot sizes have been stated in a legend on the plan. Mr. Vest commented that the lot sizes are stated on the plan. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Kuhlman if the building lines were labeled at break points on the cul -de -sac. Mr. Kuhlman stated that the lines were labeled. 2) plan proposal: a) saving the existing trees were taken in consideration by utilizing the "meadow areas" for the smaller lots and working around the large existing trees to configure the larger lots, b) proposing the north east side of the development, adjacent to North White Chapel Road and on the west side of the Kirkwood Boulevard, to part of the City's park system, and c) platting Phase II to the north for larger single family residential lots. 3) screening areas: a) along the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard (50' from the edge of the road) 1. dedicating another 30' strip of land (open space area, part of the park dedication), 2. grass and trees will be located in the 10' parkway from the edge of the curb, REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 11 3. within the 50' bufferyard there will be a walk/jog path (6' wide) and a raised 2 to 3' berm with a 6' ornamental metal fence with combination masonry (2 x 2) columns of 50' on center, 4. flowering trees will be located in the intervening area, and 5. informal trees will be located between the flowering trees and the fence to provide a buffer for lots, streets, and commercial property across the street. b) along the entire length of White Chapel Road 1. dedicating 20' for the expansion of White Chapel Road according to the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan; providing additional 10' for the required future trail 2. screening device - construct a 6' fence with a combination of board -on -board with masonry (2 x 2) columns of 50' on center constructed within the lot to be sold by the developer and installed during the development phase. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Kuhlman why he didn't propose a full masonry fence. Mr. Kuhlman commented that a good quality fence will be developed. Commissioner Hobbs is concerned with the proposal of the maintenance of the wood fence. Chairman Wright suggested putting the perimeter fences under the maintenance of the homeowner's association. Director Greg Last requested to add item #4 (pedestrian access easement to the trail plan for the west right -of -way for White Chapel Road) to the staff review letter. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Kuhlman if he concurred with the added item #4. Mr. Kuhlman commented that he preferred not to comply with this request because there will be a future walk/jog path along White Chapel Road and the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard. The two walk/jog paths will connect along Dove Road. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Kuhlman about item #2a (provide the net acreage of the project) in the staff review letter. Mr. Kuhlman commented that the 54.99 gross acres is comprised of the following: 1) 43.26 acres is for residential lots and residential right -of -way, 2) 1.50 acres is for common open space, 3) 1.40 acres is for park dedication, and REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 12 4) 8.83 acres is for the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard right -of -way. Mr. Kuhlman added that the overall acreage for the proposed park dedication is 21.1 acres within the Residential P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development). Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter stated that he did not agree with the fencing material. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -92, Development Plan for Solana, Phase I, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995, as amended as follows: 1) deleting suggested item #4 (pedestrian access easement to the trail plan for the west right -of -way for White Chapel Road). Motion: Murphy Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, and Schroetke Nays: Potter Abstained. Johnson Approved: 5 -1 -1 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #1799 -2943) Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:45 p.m. Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting at 8:54 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA95 -93, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOLANA, PHASE I Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I, being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 13 3A4A, and 3A4B and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. The property is located Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. The current zoning is "C- 3, CS, P.U.D." Districts, and the requested zoning is "R- P.U.D.," Residential Planned Unit Development (currently under consideration). The Land Use Category is Mixed Use /100 Year Flood Plain. The Owner is MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture, and the Applicant is Maguire Thomas Partners. The property is located in Spin Neighborhood #2. Ten (10) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received two (2) written responses in favor of the Preliminary Plat. This plat proposes 70 residential lots. Chairman Wright asked the Staff for clarification on item #2 (Show all existing and proposed easements within the project site which would significantly impact the site.) on the Plat Review Letter No. 1 dated October 13, 1995. Director Greg Last commented that the requirement is for any existing easements (for example, a transmission line or an electric service) that might have an impact on the layout of the plan. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff for clarification on item #6 (Consult with the City Engineering Staff on construction of the cul -de -sac and landscape area at the intersection of Streets `B' and `C'.) on the staff review letter. Director Greg Last commented that the City's Engineering Staff will need to verify that the Applicant will meet the turnaround and pavement fire lane requirements in that area. Director Greg Last requested to add comment item #13 (pedestrian access easement to White Chapel Road) to the staff review letter. Richard Kuhlman (Maguire Thomas Partners), Ocie Vest (Bury & Pittman D.F. W., Inc.), Chris Miller (S. W.A. Architects) and Rex Whitton (Vice- President of Maguire Thomas Partners), Nine Village Circle, Suite 500, Westlake, Texas 76262, represented this item. Mr. Kuhlman stated the following comments: 1) there are no existing or proposed easements within the project site 2) will comply with all of the comments except for suggested item #13 on the staff review letter 3) request to delete item #9 (The Subdivision Ordinance requires a street into the following boundary lines of the project: a) The north west boundary adjacent to Lots 1 -11, Block 2. Mr. Kuhlman stated that they own the land adjacent to the site which will be REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 14 considered for future development. The two subdivisions will not be connected. b) The northeast boundary adjacent to Lots 11 -23, Block 2 and North White Chapel Boulevard. Mr. Kuhlman stated that there was a consensus with the land owners across White Chapel not to impact the traffic flow along White Chapel Road. c) The most northerly south line adjacent to Lots 24 -28, Block 2, and Lot 2 Stanford Place Addition.) Mr. Kuhlman stated that the 18 acres is currently zoned Single Family Residential District, could be subdivided, and developed independently. He stated that he does not want to stub streets into that area. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Kuhlman about the street names listed on the plat. Mr. Kuhlman stated that the street names listed are just "fillers ". Director Greg Last commented that the Staff requires the Applicant to state streets names for easier reference to locations during this phase. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter recommended to delete suggested item #13 because of the location, and recommended it to be relocated to the north. Director Greg Last commented that Staff had no problem with this recommendation but requested for some type of connection be provided. He stated that the connection was not critical to this phase. Chairman Wright recommended the open space to the north for connection of the trail system. Mr. Kuhlman commented that the property to the north is currently not in the planning phase, and this item would be considered during its planning phase. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -93, Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995, as amended as follows: 1) deleting item #9 (provide a street into the boundary lines) 2) deleting suggested item #13 (provide a pedestrian access easement to North White REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 15 Chapel Road). Motion: Potter Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Abstained: Johnson Approved: 6 -0 -1 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #2953 -3454) AGENDA ITEM #9. ZA95-99. PLAT SHOWING Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, being 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2. The property is located 1835 N. Peytonville Ave (on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, and the requested zoning is "SF -1A" Single - Family Residential District. The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential. The Owners and Applicants are Carleo and Regina Capili. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #11. Ten (10) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written responses. On October 5, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted the Applicant's request to table to tonight's meeting and bring forth a new submittal with a more detailed blueline that will state dimensions. Commissioner Murphy asked the Staff to clarify item #4 (Lot 3 does not met the intent of the 100' minimum lot width requirement.) on the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated October 13, 1995. Director Greg Last commented that Lot 3 needs to have a minimum 100' lot width at the building line. Carleo Capili, 914 Raven Court, Southlake, Texas 76092, represented this item. He stated the following comments: 1) the new revised bluelines will be submitted on Monday, October 23, 1995 2) concerned with item #4. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 16 No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Vice - Chairman Johnson stated that the Ordinance needs to be clear on the 100' lot width requirement. Chairman Wright agreed with the Vice - Chairman in looking into the clarification of the requirement to prohibit the series of "flag lots ". He recommended a future discussion for revising the Ordinance to clarify the requirement with regard to "flag lots ". Director Greg Last stated that the Applicant's sketch shows the house to be off -set 15' to the proposed dividing line of the two lots. He added that the Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy had previously recommended to the Applicant to specify a 25' off -set, and that the Ordinance specifies a 20' off -set. If the Commission allows the lot line as shown, it would create an encroachment in the side yard setback of the existing house. He recommended the side yard requirement be slightly in excess of the 20' required. Vice - Chairman Johnson stated that it would have an effect of narrowing the throat depth by 5'. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -99, Plat Showing Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated October 13, 1995, as amended as follows: 1) deleting item #4 (Lot 3 have a 100' minimum lot width) 2) ensuring the Applicant meet item #6 (existing house on Lot 2 meet the 20' side yard requirement in relation to the proposed south lot line of Lot 2). Commissioner Potter asked the Staff if there would be adequate "drive space ". Director Greg Last commented that there would be sufficient room. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #3454 -3858) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 17 AGENDA ITEM #10. ZA95 -77, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR STACY FURNITURE WAREHOUSE Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the Applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, being 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park. The property is located at 280 Commerce Street, approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "I -1" Light Industrial District, and the requested zoning is "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I -1" Light Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 and the retail sale of furniture. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Owner and Applicant is James R. Stacy d/b /a Stacy Furniture Warehouse. The property is located in Spin Neighborhood #7. Four (4) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one (1) written response in favor of the Rezoning and Site Plan. On August 17, 1995, September 7, 1995, and September 21, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted the Applicant's request to table. The case was submitted prior to the adoption of the Corridor Overlay Zone. The Applicant meets 54% of the required number of parking spaces. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff for clarification on item #5 (project site does not meet the interior landscape area requirements or the ground cover requirements) on the Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated October 13, 1995. Zoning administrator Karen Gandy commented that the Applicant is proposing the correct number of required plants; however, the required space for the plants is not provided. She stated that the Applicant's proposal for ground cover will be grass; the Ordinance does not recognize grass as a ground cover. She added that the interior landscaping is based on the square footage of the building. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff for clarification on item #6 (Provide architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures, noting whether or note the facades meet the Masonry Ordinance requirements.) on the staff review letter. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that this item has been presented in previous staff review letters. Buddy Clapp (B. C.1.), 5412 Hidden Oaks Lane, P.O. Box 171886, Arlington, Texas 76003, represented this item. He stated that the proposed parking on the south has been added. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Clapp to clarify the north building's floors. Mr. Clapp stated that the blueline does specify the 30,000 square feet warehouse and the "half line" does specify the second floor 15,000 square feet mezzanine. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Clapp if the mezzanine in the existing warehouse (counted as retail space) was included in the number of parking spaces calculation. Mr. Clapp stated that it was included. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to clarify item #1 (The mezzanine floor areas should be included in the Site Data Summary under the intended uses and included in the required parking and loading calculations.) in the staff review letter. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy recommended for the Applicant to REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 18 state the square footage on the mezzanine floor areas and include it in the grand total of square footage of the development. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff what the differential of the number of parking spaces would be if the building was considered "retail or a warehouse ". Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that parking for the retail sales of furniture factor would be at a 1 to 400 ratio; the warehouse (industrial) is 1 to 1,000 ratio. She stated that the square footage on the mezzanine is 15,200. Mr. Clapp stated to the Commission that "the number of parking spaces has more than doubled ". Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Clapp about item #6 (building elevations) in the staff review letter. Mr. Clapp commented that all buildings will be constructed of masonry material. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff if the Applicant has meet the interior landscaping requirement in accordance with the Landscape Ordinance (11,754 square feet area). Director Greg Last commented that the Applicant has meet 10,100 square feet; the Applicant has intended to provide the number of plants in accordance with the 11,754 square feet area. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter stated that Mr. Stacy promised to bring comparisons of other cities' parking space requirements for similar furniture stores to alleviate some other the parking concerns. Mr. Clapp commented that Mr. Stacy was unavailable. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse subject to Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated October 13, 1995, as amended as follows: 1) clarifying item #1 (mezzanine floor areas), 2) clarifying item #2 (floor areas of the warehouse area of the north building addition), 3) deleting item #4A (5'A bufferyard is required along the south property line), 4) deleting item #4B (10' -F1 bufferyard with minimum 6' stockade fence is required REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 19 along the west property line), 5) deleting the overall space requirement in item #5, but will have to comply with supplying ground cover, 6) ensuring item #6 is submitted (architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures) and meet the Masonry Ordinance requirements, 7) accepting the number of parking spaces, and 8) deleting item #8 (screening requirements for the trash dumpster). Motion: Johnson Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #3859 -4763) AGENDA ITEM #11, REVISIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 483-D Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that the curvilinear requirements noted from the previous meeting have been incorporated in Draft No. 4 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 -D. He presented a comparison of the current versus proposed standards of curvilinear requirements in existing additions. The Commission recommended the following: 1) change Section 5.03(A)2 -4 as follows: a) changing percentage to 50% minimum of the lots to be curvilinear. This was determined by looking at the curvilinear comparison which determined that even the small gross acreage additions were meeting the 50% minimum curvilinear design. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 20 No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 -D, Draft No. 4, as amended as follows: 1) Section 5.03(A)2 -4 changing percentage to 50% minimum of the lots to be curvilinear. Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #4764 -5545) AGENDA ITEM #12, REVISIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 483-E Planner Tom Elgin presented Draft No. 3 of the Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 -E. The Commission recommended the following: 1) for the Staff to clarify the sentences in the memorandum from Tom Elgin dated October 13, 1995, "Please be aware that this draft does not contain any changes with regard to the "Hold Harmless" language. The City Attorney is researching recent case law information with regard to applicability of such clauses if there is negligence." , Director Greg Last recommended for approval subject to the city attorney's providing an opinion on the "Hold Harmless" clause. 2) specify in Section 5.04(C)4 that the homeowner's association has the ability by vote to change their restrictions, and 3) specify in Section 5.04(D)3 that the homeowner's association affiliated with private streets cannot change their restrictions unless the City can approve the change(s) or turn the streets over to the City. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 21 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. No Commission discussion. Motion was made to approve Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance 483 -E, Draft No. 3, as amended as follows: 1) subject to City Attorney's investigation and opinion on the "Hold Harmless" clause 2) specifying in Section 5.04(C)4 the City Attorney Review be limited to private street issues. Commissioner Hobbs suggested for the City Attorney's comments be attached to the ordinance as it goes forth to City Council. Director Greg Last commented that it will be attached to either a separate opinion or be included in the City Manager's letter. Motion: Johnson Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #5549 -6011) AGENDA ITEM #13. REVISIONS TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480-T Zoning Administrator Karen presented Draft No. 1 of Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -T to permit outside container storage for retailers in the "C -3" General Commercial District. She recommended to amend the Section 22, Specific Use in the Zoning Ordinance, adding Section 38 to allow outside storage for retail purposes for users that can meet the follow criteria: 1) the sole tenant structure exceeds 100,000 square feet of floor area REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 22 2) total area of outside storage does not exceed one percent of the lot area 3) outside storage area is located behind the front facade of the building, in the side or rear buildable, area and not encroaching into any required setback or designated fire lane; and 4) a minimum 6' screening fence or wall of masonry or wood, in combination with a metal frame, and an opaque gate enclose the storage area. The Commission offered the following: 1) recommended not to support the permit of outside containers due to the fact of recent approval of the regulations and articulation requirements of the Corridor Overlay Zone, 2) stated outside storage facilities are not taxed, and 3) stated that there is a nearby existing storage facility. Commissioner Hobbs recommended that City Council put restrictions, taxes, or fines for removal of these outside storage containers. Zoning Administrator Karen presented Draft No. 1 of Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -T to permit certain satellite dishes as permitted uses in certain non - residential district rathers than permit them as accessory uses. She added that certain retail stores would like the modern technology that a satellite dish offers for business transactions. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 1, section #6011 -7037) Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter asked the Staff if this agenda item was disapproved, will it go forth to City Council. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that it will go forth to City Council as a recommendation to denial. She added that it will take a 3/4 vote for approval. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 23 Motion was made to disapprove Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -T, Draft No. 1. Motion: Potter Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 2, section #0 -191) CONTINUATION OF AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS Director Greg Last said he will be faxing a memorandum to City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the work session on Ordinance No. 480 -Q. This memo will provide an opportunity for people to prioritize their date preferences for the work session which will play a vital factor in assuring a high attendance. Vice - Chairman Johnson recommended that the City Mayor be present at the work session. The Commission requested a clean copy of Ordinance No. 480 -Q, that was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, which will go forth to City Council. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 2, section #191-717) AGENDA ITEM #14. MEETING ADJOURNMENT Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:50 p.m. on October 19, 1995. Motion Potter Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 10- 19 -95, tape 2, section #717 -723) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1995 PAGE 24 Joe Wriiht Chairman ATTEST: Laurie Sheets Secretary G: \ W PF \MTG \MIN\ 1 0- 19 -95. MIN THE STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTY OF * / t am . CP�� I, 66A t kl �c � as a member of the tf �1 et 26-4 make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and/or a person or persons related to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote or decision of the 2 1 S- , 7 Z 7 4 5 7 as those terms are defined in Chapter 171, Texas Local e. Government Code. The business entity is �5 n" \ �-„---` c 0 -..,7- A .A..„- 0.-L 1 ,......)L-( (name and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (check all which are applicable) • Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever. ( 4---- Signed this l � 'day of (2 L v2— , 19 ( \ . ,rsL......._._____,__ ignature of Official L �.L r -P Title BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared 54eAtAt and on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of ) knowledge or belief. Swor and subscribed to before me on this / / day of 19 Atio."0.44eke •P � SANDRA L L GRAND $ o tary Public i n and for the State of Texas s NOTARY PUBLIC State of Texas Comm. Exp. 02 -04-97 Type/Print Notary's Name My Commission Expires: G:\ W PF\FORMS\AFFID.FRM