Loading...
1995-08-17 P&Z Meeting - City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 17. 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:30 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 3, 1995. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider ZA95 -73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential), being 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP -IBM Addition No.1 as recorded in Volume 388 -211, Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, P.R.D.C.T. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St.. and West of North White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District," CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning: "R- P.U.D.," Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner: MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2. Continue Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA95 -74, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solaria (Non- Residential), being 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 1C, 2A, 2A1, 2A2, 2A5, 2A6, 2A7, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being portions of Tracts 1 and 1C. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), South of Kirkwood Boulevard and North of West Dove Road. Current Zoning: "C -3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning: "NR- P.U.D." Non - Residential Planned Unit Development District ", "C -3" General Commercial District, "0-2" Office District, "HC" Hotel District, City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST )4, 1995 PAGE 2 t j and "CS" Community Service District. Owner: MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2. Continue Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA95 -76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1 -6, Block 1, and Lots 1 -7, Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 and being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. Location: South and adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114) and North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1000' West of Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "C- 3" Commercial District. Owner: James Farrar, et. al.; Applicant: The Midland Development Group. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Continue Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA95 -77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, being 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park. Location: 280 Commerce Street, approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "I -1" Light Industrial District; Requested Zoning: "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I -1" Light Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 and the retail sale of furniture. Owner /Applicant: James R. Stacy d /b /a Stacy Furniture Warehouse. Spin Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA95 -79, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park, being 6.715 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R and all of Lot 8, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I. Location: 1475' North of East Continental Blvd. on the west side of South Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "I -1" Light Industrial District; Requested Zoning: "SF -20A" Single Family Residential District. Owners: David and Beverly Thorne and ELFM Corporation; Applicant: Terra Land Development Company. Spin Neighborhood #7. The property proposes thirteen (13) residential lots. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA95 -80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition, being 89.744 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tract 2, and the City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 0, 1995 PAGE 3 John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6A, 6A1, 6B, and 6B1. Location: North of East Continental Blvd. and West of S. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "SF -20A" Single Family Residential. Owners: Clifford Wayne Hood and Glenda Sue Hood, Nolan Lemons and Malacha A. Lemons, Billie Farrar Trustee, Southlake Joint Venture; Applicant: Terra Land Development. Spin Neighborhood #8. The plat indicates 146 residential lots. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA95 -81, Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I, being a revision of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1328, P.R.T.C.T and 0.064 acres of Tract 1B situated in the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519 for a total of 0.833 acres. Location: 302 and 304 Quail Court, Northwest of the intersection of Redwing Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. Current Zoning: "R- P.U.D" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners: The Estate of Audrey L Stone, deceased; the Estate of A.C. Stone, deceased; Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc.; William Byrne and Monica Waite; Applicant: Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. Spin Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing. 11. Consider: Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -Q establishing special regulations for development adjacent to residential areas. Continue Public Hearing. 12. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, August 11, 1995 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. ita itd‘j 4:1 74. im : ush ti A ng City Secretary d`� hamosso- City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST J,1' 1995 PAGE 4 17 If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481 -5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. G: \WPF \MTG \AGN\Q8- 17 -95. WPD REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 17, 1995 MINUTES COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice - Chairman Ernest Johnson; Members: Randy Arnold, James Murphy, Arthur Hobbs, Rex Potter, and Dona Schroetke COMMISSION ABSENT: none CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director Greg Last, Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, Planner Tom Elgin, Engineer Ron Harper, City Manager Curtis E. Hawk, and Secretary Laurie Sheets The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:30 p.m. Agenda Item #2, Approval of Minutes Vice- Chairman Johnson recommended that the paragraph on the bottom of page fourteen and proceeds to the top of page fifteen should be deleted for the matter was addressed again in the latter part of the hearing. Commissioner Hobbs recommended that on page nine, fourth paragraph, first sentence, the name "Potter" be changed to the name "Hobbs ". Motion was made to approve the minutes of the August 3, 1995 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting as amended. Motion: Johnson Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Abstained: Arnold Approved: 6 -0 -1 Abstaining Commissioner Arnold was not present at the Planning and Zoning Meeting on August 3, 1995. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 1, section #0 -60) Agenda Item #3, Administrative Comments No Staff comments. No Commission discussion. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 1, section #60 -62) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 2 Vice - Chairman Johnson stepped down on the next two agenda items. Agenda Item #4, ZA95 -73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential), being 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP -IBM Addition No.1 as recorded in Volume 388 -211, Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, P.R.D.C.T. The property is located Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. The current zoning is "C -3" General Commercial District," CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District. The requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. The owner is MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. The applicant is Maguire Thomas Partners. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #2. Twenty -four written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area; four written responses were received within the notification area from the first notice, one written response was received outside the notification area from the first notice, and one written response was received within the notification area from the second notice (courtesy letter). The Concept Plan proposes Kirkwood Boulevard to be extended through the project, separating the Residential P.U.D. from the Non - Residential P.U.D. to the west. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the request of the applicant to table this item from the August 3, 1995 meeting to tonight's meeting. Tom Allen (Maguire Thomas Partners), Nine Village Circle, Suite 500, Westlake, Texas 76262, was present to represent this item. Mr. Allen requested for 199.2 acres to be zoned for a Residential Planned Unit Development with mixed uses which will allow up to 10% ancillary uses. He discussed the letter submitted on August 7, 1995 that addressed concerns from the last Planning and Zoning Meeting on August 3, 1995 and the Staff comments on the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated July 28, 1995. He informed the Commission that a revised Concept Plan Layout has just been completed and will soon be delivered. He also wanted to address comments recommended from the Staff on the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated August 11, 1995: item #1 (Correct the zoning shown for the Bill Massey Tract to reflect "SP -2" (480 -91).) would be applied and item #2 (Product Type 'B' calls for a maximum lot coverage of 50% on not more than 25% of the lots and a maximum lot coverage of 40% on not more than 75% of the lots. Ordinance 480 -0, Section 30.5, pertaining to residential PUD's, requires that all buildings or structures shall have maximum lot coverage not exceeding 30% of the lot area.) is not • REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 3 appropriate for Product Type 'B'. The requested Product Type 'B' design is similar with the Timarron Golf Villas Development. According to the development of the Timarron Golf Villas, the development had a restriction that allowed for no more than 25% of the lots and to the remaining 75% or more of the lots, there was a maximum 40% lot coverage. However, the 50% lot coverage was designed to accommodate single story, 3,000 square feet houses that could cover the 50% lot coverage. Item #2 was addressed at the last meeting and agreed upon, the plan has been updated to reflect this item. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Allen about the amenities for the planned community. Mr. Allen commented that their proposal is designed to save and enhance the natural aspects of the property. He also commented that across State Highway 114 the Solana Village Center is comprised of a various amount of amenities to offer the proposed development. He stated to the Commissioner that he had meet with the Park Board and discussed the proposal for a 30 feet dedication along White Chapel Road through the City. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Allen about the proposed trail system around the flood plain. Mr. Allen commented that the development proposes to give the City a right -of -way; White Chapel will be widened which will take an additional 10 feet on each side of his property that will be donated to the City and outside of the right -of -way they propose to donate 30 feet for the trail system to tie into the parks, additional land, and will provide a link to the north end. He proposed some kind of trail along one side of Kirkwood Boulevard. He stated that at the present time the creek (flowage easement from Grapevine Lake) would be preserved in its natural setting. Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. Allen if there is a quality builder(s) in mind for the multi - family development. Mr. Allen commented that the plan is striving towards a high quality development . He stated that a numerous amount of telephone calls have been received from developers that are interested in the construction phase of this development. Commissioner Potter addressed Mr. Allen about the concern that was raised from the SPIN Meeting that he had attended regarding the commercial and ancillary use at the bottom of the development, and if it was mostly likely going to be comprised of the office district. Mr. Allen clarified that the composition of the office district was probably referred to at the meeting with the property across the street. Mr. Allen commented that 7 acres will have to be a residential district; the request for uses that could be two- stories or higher has been taken out. The commercial district will have to be compatible to the residential district. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Allen if they could split the proposal having 10% on the north side and 10% on the south side and limit the uses to the southern portion. Mr. Allen informed Commissioner Schroetke that her concern will be looked into and could be addressed after he has had time to consult with the other applicants in the matter. Commissioner Hobbs asked Mr. Allen if gasoline service stations could be considered in the "C -3" REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 4 District comment excluding the permitted uses: tires, batteries, automobile accessories, etc. Commissioner Potter stated to Mr. Allen that he had discussed with the school system the impact the development might have on the schools. Commissioner Potter stated that there might be an additional estimated figure of 176 elementary students from the development and that this would be under the Johnson Elementary School which could not absorb this additional capacity. Commissioner Potter stated that the way the property is designed will not generate revenue to help the schools. Mr. Allen replied that the development is partially in Westlake and Southlake but all of Solana is with the Carroll Independent School District. Mr. Allen also commented that from 1989 through 1995, they have paid approximately 19 million dollars in school taxes and the development has not had one student in the Southlake School District. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Harold Kruckenberg, 1730 Hunter's Creek, Southlake, Texas 76092, asked the Commission if Product Types 'A' and 'B' were requested and if Product Types 'C' and 'D' would be deleted. Chairman Wright stated that the request in the northern portion of the property is for Product Types 'A', 'B', 'C', and 'D'; the middle portion of the property will allow only Product Type 'A'; and the southern portion will allow Product Type 'A' or the ancillary use of commercial. Mr. Kruckenberg asked, "How many would they limit it too ? ". Chairman Wright stated that Product Type 'B' is limited to 70 units, 6,000 square feet lots in the northern portion. Commissioner Murphy stated that the remaining development is limited by the number of acres undeveloped. Mr. Kruckenberg asked how many apartments or houses are in one dwelling unit. Chairman Wright commented that the figure is one. Mr. Kruckenberg also asked if 434 dwellings were still requested. Chairman Wright informed Mr. Kruckenberg that the request has not changed and 2.18 density is based on the 199.2 total gross acres; and if they did use 10% of the 20 acres for commercial use, it would be taken out of their density requirement. Mr. Kruckenberg stated that the growth of the development will overload the school system which will promote the need to build additional schools. Mr. Kruckenberg also stated that the proposed development will have Dove Road as an access road and asked if they could relocate the access road to Kirkwood Boulevard. Marvin Van Hal, 280 Bob Jones Road, Southlake, Texas 76092, is concerned with the goal of the development of Southlake and asked for some time delay of this request to allow other concerned citizens to voice their comments on the matter who could not attend the meeting. Pam Rice, 455 Brooks Court, Southlake, Texas 76092, stated that she has investigated the other amenities across State Highway 1114 and finds them costly and limited in their use. Ms. Rice recommended for the amenities in the residential areas to further studied. Dennis McGrath, 2403 N. Carroll, Southlake, Texas 76092, recommended that Product Type 'A" REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 5 be defined, have the areas designated, and the ancillary uses be limited to the northern area. Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:45 p.m. Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting at 8:55 p.m. Mr. Allen requested a change in the ancillary uses to delete fueling stations in residential areas. Mr. Allen also proposed that only residential uses adjacent to White Chapel access White Chapel Road. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Allen what he proposed to do on the common property line with the Stafford Place Addition which is consisted of 1 acre lots. Mr. Allen commented that per the Ordinance, they are required to have a minimum 30,000 square feet lot around the property and if it is not residential, there are setback requirements. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated that if it was a commercial district adjacent to another commercial district, it would be a 10 feet rear setback; and if it was a commercial district adjacent to another commercial district it would have a 25 feet rear setback. She stated that the bufferyards increase depending on intensity of the commercial adjacent to the residential area. Commissioner Schroetke recommended to having a "SP -1" Detailed Site Plan District in which the uses will be defined. John Richardson, 4537 Homestead Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, requested the Commission to slow the process and cover all the angles of the development. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that part of the P.U.D process is that the level of intensity or commercial use is determined at the zoning phase of the development. After the zoning request has been accepted then the applicant goes before the Commission and the City Council with a Development Plan which will demonstrate the layout of the proposal, the location of where it will be adjacent to residential areas, and the type of bufferyard. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter commented on the following items: 1) opposed to the variance request of 650 square feet instead of the 850 square feet requirement set by the Ordinance, 2) opposed to the depth of the lot from 100 versus 125 feet in the zoning, 3) recommended the area adjacent to Dove Street be residential district instead of the additional "CS" and "C -3" Districts requested, and REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 6 4) opposed to the increased road use on Dove Road. Commissioner Hobbs commented that the 650 square feet apartment is actually limited to a one person individual residence which supports the working single individual concept presented. He stated that "there is a need for additional businesses and the two pieces of property go hand -in- hand ". The property is already zoned "C -3" District and the applicant could request to build a commercial use on the property tomorrow. Commissioner Murphy commented that he did not have any problems with the 650 square feet apartment request and the proposed amenities. Commissioner Arnold commented that the tax base from the commercial district will be substantially more than the residential district; furthermore, there is a need for a residential district to be developed to support the commercial district. Commissioner Hobbs agreed with Commissioner Schroetke in the concern with the commercial use in the southeast area. Chairman Wright commented that there could be restrictions on the P.U.D. if the applicant was requesting a Site Plan instead of the Concept Plan with their zoning change request. Commissioner Hobbs has a concern with No. 25 (skating rink) in the "C -3" District, which will require a large parking area and the height of the building will be substantial to eliminate fogging inside the building due to the vast amount of people inside. This type of usage will not be beneficial in this area. Commissioner Potter asked for the clarification of the lot depth and why the applicant is requesting the setback be bigger in the back of the lot to accommodate the trees. Chairman Wright commented that the reason for this request is for the ability to "shift" the houses in accordance with the layout of the trees, for example, the plan of the development of Timarron. Chairman Wright recommended that the ancillary uses adjacent to Dove Street be limited to 10 acres and need to be defined. Planner Tom Elgin commented that the proposed 10 acre area would have a starting point at the northwest corner of the city water tower and be positioned in a diagonal line of approximately 740 feet to a point on Kirkwood Boulevard north of Dove Road. Chairman Wright called for the applicant to come to the podium to discuss Commission concerns. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff why was the bufferyard determined for Product Type 'A' a "Fl". Commissioner Potter requested to change Product Type 'A' bufferyard to a minimum "F2" requirement which will require a masonry wall. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Allen about the bufferyard preference for Product Type 'A'. Mr. Allen stated that he was opposed to the "F2" recommendation for the bufferyard due to the density proposed will not need large bufferyards. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Allen if the Commission could address the bufferyard requirement on REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 7 the Site Plan to allow Mr. Allen more time in his proposal on the bufferyard. Mr. Allen agreed to allowing the bufferyard specifications to be addressed on the Site Plan. Chairman Wright stated that if the Commission approved the request in which 10 acres would be for ancillary uses, the boundaries for those ancillary uses could be better specified in the Site Plan. Chairman Wright recommended for the multi - family development, such as apartments, to have a maximum of 50% with a minimum floor area of 650 square feet and the remaining 50% having a minimum floor area of 850 square feet. Mr. Allen commented that he had no problem with that request. Commissioner Hobbs asked Mr. Allen his comments about the recommendation for excluding the ice rink request from the permitted uses in "C -3" District. Mr. Allen commented that he had no problem with that request. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential) as amended and subject to Plan Review Letter dated on August 11, 1995 with the following requirements: 1) Multi - Family Units: no more than 50% of the units will be developed under the 850 square feet requirement with a minimum requirement of 650 square feet. 2) Southeast Portion of the Property: no more than 10 acres in that portion will be for ancillary uses having a boundary starting at the northwest portion of the City property, heading northwest to the intersection of the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard. 3) "C -3" General Commercial District: exclude the permitted uses for ice and roller skating rinks; gasoline service stations; tires, batteries, and auto accessory sales from the district. 4) Bufferyards: delete the bufferyard requirement shown on the Concept Plan; but establish bufferyard requirement at the Site Plan stage. 5) Product Type B Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: have a side yard adjacent to a street of not less than ten (10) feet. Motion: Murphy Second: Arnold Ayes: Wright, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, and Schroetke Nays: none Abstained: Johnson Approved: (6 -0 -1) REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 8 Commissioner Hobbs requested that the applicant be sure to deliver the revised Concept Plan to the Commission for future review. Mr. Allen commented that the request would be granted. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 1, section #64 -5177) Agenda Item #5. ZA95 -74. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non- Residential) Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non- Residential), being 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 1C, 2A, 2A1, 2A2, 2A5, 2A6, 2A7, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being portions of Tracts 1 and 1C. The property is located Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), South of Kirkwood Boulevard and North of West Dove Road. The current zoning is "C -3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District. The requested zoning is "NR- P.U.D." Non - Residential Planned Unit Development District, "C -3" General Commercial District, "0-2" Office District, "HC" Hotel District, and "CS" Community Service District with the exception of excluding the tires, batteries, and automobile sales. The owner is MTP -IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. The applicant is Maguire Thomas Partners. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #2. Three written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written response. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the request of the applicant to table this item from the August 3, 1995 meeting to tonight's meeting. Tom Allen (Maguire Thomas Partners), Nine Village Circle, Suite 500, Westlake, Texas 76262, was present to represent this item. Mr. Allen discussed the letter submitted on August 7, 1995 that addressed the Commission and Staffs comments. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Allen for the clarification of the location of the "MF -2" District request. Mr. Allen commented that it is due to the fact of the property's topography. Commissioner Potter commented to Mr. Allen that if it is zoned "MF -2" District it could all be zoned "MF -2 "; therefore, the entire area of ancillary uses could consist of apartments. Chairman Wright requested Mr. Allen to estimate how many apartment units per acre might fit in that 12.7 acres area based on the topography, trees, and single- loaded streets. Mr. Allen estimated twelve apartment units per acre. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 9 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Commissioner Potter recommended not to include the multi - family district in this property. Commissioner Murphy asked the Staff if there were any restrictions on dwelling units per acre in the ancillary use portion of a non - residential P.U.D. Director Greg Last stated that based on the underlying zoning in the multi - family, it would be the 12 units per acre or as permitted. Commissioner Murphy is not opposed to the multi - family district; however, there is a need to restrict the number of units. Commissioner Hobbs questioned the percentage of the mixed ancillary uses. Chairman Wright requested the applicant to define the location of the permanent open space and the land adjacent to the portion that will contain the ancillary uses. Chairman Wright also asked if the flood plain was considered in the open space portion or the ancillary use portion. Mr. Allen pointed out the ancillary use area and the open space area on the Concept Plan for the Commission. The line on the Concept Plan is incorrect. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Allen if he would like to present this item again with a more defined map. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 1, #5177 -6970) Chairman Wright also commented that the applicant provide evidence if the 12 units per acre is realistic or not. Mr. Allen stated that he would like to come back at another time and present the additional information. Motion was made to table ZA95 -74, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non - Residential) per the request of the applicant till the Planning and Zoning Meeting on September 7, 1995. Motion: Murphy Second: Hobbs Ayes: Wright, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Abstained: Johnson Approved: 6 -0 -1 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #0 -94) Chairman Wright asked the Staff for the time in foreseeing Resolution No. 95 -24 coming into effect. Secretary Laurie Sheets commented that it was 10:43 p.m. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 10 Chairman Wright commented that according to the new adopted Resolution No. 95 -24, no zoning case can be addressed after 11:00 p.m. Mr. Stacy suggested to skip the Preliminary Plat and address his case ZA95 -77 before 11:00 p.m. City Manager Curtis E. Hawk commented that the resolution was adopted to give the general public an opportunity to attend the public hearings at a reasonable hour. The policy should be adhered to unless the City Council addresses it otherwise. Commissioner Hobbs recommended for the Planning and Zoning Meetings to start at 7:00 p.m. to assist in moving the cases forward. Chairman Wright informed Rick Stacy that ZA95 -77 cannot be heard until the Planning and Zoning Meeting on September 7, 1995. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #95 -440) Agenda Item #6, ZA95 -76, Preliminary Plat Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1 -6, Block 1, and Lots 1 -7, Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 and being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. The property is located South and adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114) and North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1000' West of Kimball Ave. The current zoning is "C -3" Commercial District. The owner is James Farrar, et. al. The applicant is The Midland Development Group. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #4. Fifteen written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one written response (in favor) within the notification area. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the request of the applicant to table this item from the August 3, 1995 meeting to tonight's meeting. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff to clarify to item #2B (provide minimum center line radii of 600 feet with a minimum common tangent length of 100 feet for Village Center Drive) and item #4 regarding the common lot lines of Lots 4 and 8, Block B on the Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 and the letter from JBM Engineers and Planners dated August 10, 1995. Director Greg Last commented that the subdivision ordinance requires item #2B and the letter from the applicant's consultant is in response to our staff comments on the Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995. The intent of the letter from the consultant is to show justification for centerline radii on four lane street less than 600 feet which is not incompliance with the Subdivision Ordinance. Director Greg Last commented to item #4 in that on the first Plat Review Summary letter dated July REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 11 28, 1995 requested for the applicant to change Blocks A and B to Blocks 1 and 2 and then apparently in the second review letter the revised block name did not get changed to the revised name. Lot 8 should be designated as Lot 5. Commissioner Arnold asked the location of the service road of State Highway 114. Director Greg Last pointed out to the Commission that the connection of Village Center Drive is in the future right - of -way of State Highway 114. Director Greg Last pointed out, on an overhead - projected map, the future right -of -way of State Highway 114 which will be "just upstream of the "gore ". A gore is where the off -ramp ties in with the frontage road. There will be a three lane frontage road. The applicant has shown pad -site lots in the future right -of -way of State Highway 114. Texas Department of Transportation has been not authorized for right -of -way acquisition; however, they have the authorization to purchase the right -of -way if development is imminent. The applicant does own the property and has the right to plat it to their specifications. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff what type of road is specified. Director Greg Last stated that the road would be considered an "A4U" Arterial Four -Lane Undivided road with 70 feet right -of- way and four 12 feet lanes. Commissioner Potter asked the Staff if the back of the future development of the Kroeger Store will be facing the future expansion of State Highway 114. Director Greg Last confirmed this statement. Barry Hudson (JBM Engineers and Planners), 2630 W. Freeway, Suite 100, Fort worth, Texas 76020, and Don Silverman (Midland Development Group), 15935 Century Forest Circle, Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this item. Mr. Hudson commented that the name of the development has been changed from Farrar Addition to Village Center Addition to correlate with the Corridor Study. The two major issues are the street proposal and the lot configuration. The future right -of -way line for State Highway 114 established by the Highway Department has been taken into consideration that area has been divided into one acre lots in the interim, depending upon the time of that expansion. Mr. Hudson stated that the reason for the spine street in the center of the tract is for access to the commercial properties from both arterials (F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114) and is aligned with Westwood Drive in anticipation of a signal light at this location. The development will be developed in two phases: the eastern portion as phase I and the western portion as phase II. Mr. Hudson commented on item #2 (regarding the right -of -way for the deceleration and acceleration lanes) Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated August 11, 1995. He proposes restriping the pavement on the existing F.M. 1709 to facilitate a deceleration and acceleration lane at the intersection. The construction of the pavement section has 12 feet shoulders on both sides of the moving lanes which will allow restriping. Commissioner Potter asked what were the plans for Lots 1 and 2 off of F.M. 1709 because of their smaller pad size. Mr. Silverman commented that the pad could accommodate fast food restaurants, REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 12 banks, or other uses. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Silverman if the access to the property would be off of the Village Center Parkway and not F.M. 1709. Mr. Silverman stated that the design is the interior access from Village Center Drive. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Silverman about the intent for any proposed driveways. Mr. Silverman stated that with the driveway restrictions they probably would have perimeter driveways at both the eastern and western edges of the property to provide commercial access. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Silverman if Lot 2, Block 2 will have a curb cut onto F.M. 1709. Mr. Silverman commented that design at this time does not show a curb cut at Lot 2, Block 2 onto F.M. 1709. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Silverman to explain the open area between Block 1, Lot 3. Mr. Silverman commented that their will probably be buildings between Lot 3 and the existing Wal -mart Store property line set back off of F.M. 1709. Essentially, Lot 3 will be set in front of the buildings. Commissioner Schroetke asked Mr. Silverman if there were any prospective tenants for the property. Mr. Silverman commented that there was a possible grocery store to be developed. Chairman Wright commented that there was a 30 feet access easement that goes to the west that adjoins the adjacent property will not be sufficient. Mr. Silverman commented that it has been recently revised on internal plans that have not been submitted to the Commission yet which will reflect a 50 feet easement from the Village Center Drive to the west. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Silverman what the setback would be for a building from the 50 feet easement. Mr. Silverman commented that the access easement will not have direct parking and no backing into the moving lane and that it is intended to be a fire lane also which will limit parking off of it. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Mike Heath (resident of Woodland Heights), 211 Westwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, is concerned with all the lots down F.M. 1709 and the frontage of the developments to F.M. 1709 . Chairman Wright commented that the Corridor Study will address these concerns. Mr. Silverman commented that the commercial buildings will probably face F.M. 1709. Chairman Wright commented that as long as the lots meet the requirements set forth in city's ordinances and state requirement, then the Commission is obligated to approve the plat with minor changes recommended. Dennis Minder (resident of Woodland Heights),223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed to the road connecting into Woodland Heights and the traffic that will be generated in that addition. Mr. Minder recommended the road to be realigned in a different location. Mike Schroetke (resident of Woodland Heights), 211 Eastwood, Southlake, Texas 76092, thinks that REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 13 this proposal is not serving the intent of the Corridor Study and the proposed intersection's purpose is to serve the site. Mr. Schroetke recommended a new zoning district for that area between the entrance of Southlake at State Highway 114 to Carroll Avenue. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff if they were satisfied with the applicant's comments regarding item #2A (Additional right of way along East Southlake Boulevard will be required for acceleration, deceleration, and turn lanes.) Director Greg Last commented that the information is not available to appropriately answer; however, regardless of the alignment of the road, the uses will require some type of deceleration lane outside of the existing lanes in F.M. 1709. The Highway Department probably built those lanes with anticipation for those lanes to be driving lanes and, if that is the case, there will be a need for additional right -of -way to accommodate a deceleration lane at that road. Director Greg Last recommended that on a contingent basis, the Commission request for the additional right -of -way. Upon review of the Site Plan and the Concept Plan, the traffic impact could be further analyzed to see for how big that should be. Commissioner Potter asked why the Thoroughfare Plan did not develop a road in the entire "C -3" District. Vice - Chairman Johnson suggested Commissioner Potter to consider the timing of the adoption of the Thoroughfare Plan. Director Greg Last commented that those streets could not be defined at that time and were thought of as internal - circulation type streets. Chairman Wright commented to Commissioner Potter that he did not consider the road going through the Village Center to be a Thoroughfare street; that this street is designed to serve this development. Commissioner Schroetke commented on the following: moving the realignment of the street by taking the southern -end of the street and direct it westward toward Carroll Avenue; opposed to the 50 feet access easement proposal due to the insufficient footage; delete the traffic signal request and maybe address it later in the Developer's Agreement in the future. Chairman Wright commented that the Commission does have the authority to request the road to be moved to a different location. Mr. Silverman commented that the proposed road was designed for the management of the traffic flow. Chairman Wright asked the Staff about their comments in reference to the relocating the road. Director Greg Last commented that an internal road of some configuration will be needed for the commercial intensity. Vice - Chairman Johnson recommended that if the road was relocated that it be realigned to the east for practical purposes. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 14 Mr. Hudson submitted to the Commission a revised Preliminary Plat with the proposed road at a different location. Commissioner Murphy asked Mr. Hudson if the new submittal proposed a curb cut in the location of what was the driveway. Mr. Hudson stated that new submittal has not had any site planning and could not confirm this; however, this version has the 50 feet access easement to the west all the way to the Diamond Shamrock property line. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1 -6, Block 1, and Lots 1 -7, Block 2 with the alternate plan submittal, subject to Staff review prior to going to City Council, and subject to the Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 (deleting item #2B comment). Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, and Hobbs Nays: Potter and Schroetke Approved: 5 -2 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #444 -3379) Chairman Wright asked the Staff on the direction that it would like to proceed with on the next two agenda items. Director Greg Last recommended to open the public hearings of cases ZA95 -77 and ZA95 -79 and continue the public hearing. Commissioner Wright again addressed the Resolution No. 95 -24 guidelines which states that a zoning case cannot be addressed after 11:00 p.m. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #3380 -3409) Agenda Item #7, ZA95 -77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, being 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park. The property is located 280 Commerce Street, approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "I -1" Light Industrial District. The requested zoning is "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I -1" Light Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 and the retail sale of furniture. the owner and applicant is James R. Stacy d/b /a Stacy Furniture Warehouse. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. Four written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one written response (in favor) within the notification area. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 15 No discussion from the audience. No Commission discussion. Motion was made to table ZA95 -77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse till the Planning and Zoning Meeting on September 7, 1995 and continue the public hearing. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #3410 -3435) Agenda Item #8. ZA95 -79. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park, being 6.715 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R and all of Lot 8, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I. The property is located 1475' North of East Continental Blvd. on the west side of South Kimball Ave. The current zoning is "I -1" Light Industrial District. The requested zoning is "SF -20A" Single Family Residential District. The owners are David and Beverly Thorne and ELFM Corporation. The applicant is Terra Land Development Company. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #7. The property proposes thirteen (13) residential lots. Five written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received one written response (in favor) within the notification area. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. No Commission discussion. Motion was made to table ZA95 -79, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park till the Planning and Zoning Meeting on September 7, 1995 and continue the public hearing. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 16 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #3435 -3457) Chairman Wright called for a recess at 12:30 a.m. Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting at 12:40 a.m. Agenda Item #9. ZA95 -80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition, being 89.744 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tract 2, and the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6A, 6A1, 6B, and 6B1. The property is located North of East Continental Blvd. and West of S. Kimball Ave. The current zoning is "SF -20A" Single Family Residential. The owners are Clifford Wayne Hood and Glenda Sue Hood, Nolan Lemons and Malacha A. Lemons, Billie Farrar Trustee, Southlake Joint Venture. The applicant is Terra Land Development. The property located in Spin Neighborhood #8. The plat indicates 146 residential lots. Twenty -five written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has received two written responses (in favor) and three verbal responses (Jim Lunsford, P.D. Box 1685, Dallas, Texas 75225, in favor; Sue Hill, 1300 S. Bowen Road, Arlington, Texas 75221, in favor; Peter Sporrer, 1214 Woodsey Court, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed to entrance on Continental and requested signal lights) within the notification area. Commissioner Arnold asked the Staff if the City has an inventory of how many of the "SF -20A" District are in the City. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that there is one called the Residential Development Summary which was updated in May 1995. Planner Tom Elgin stated that the summary is categorized by the total residential lots. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff about item #7 on the Staff Review Letter dated August 11, 1995 regarding the street stub and where does the Staff propose to locate it. Director Greg Last commented that comment needs to reworded differently to state that it should be located off Westminster and headed west to the Nelson tract. Paul Spain (Terra Land Development Company), 920 S. Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, was present to represent this item. Chairman Wright asked Mr. Spain if he had any comments regarding the Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995. Mr. Spain commented that he was concerned with item #5 (would like to keep the length of the cul -de -sac) and the comment pertaining to too many lots on the cul -de -sac. It has the correct number of lots on it. Mr. Spain requested to widen the right -of -way 60 feet and widen the street pavement to 37 feet to eliminate the problems associated with the length of the cul- REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 17 de -sacs. Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. Spain if he planned to phase the development out. Mr. Spain confirmed that was the intent. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Spain about the comment from Staff, item #5. Mr. Spain stated that the Staff might have counted the two lots that front on the crossing street. Director Greg Last commented that was probably what was figured. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Dennis Minder (resident of Woodland Heights), 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, asked if the Commission would address the drainage issue at Kimball Avenue and Woodland Heights Subdivision. Mr. Minder asked if the pads for Lots 73, 74, and 75 not be built up so high in which it would create their water to be pushed backed into their lots. He recommended that the Commission not waive 1000 feet requirement on Manchester Court. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: Chairman Wright asked Mr. Spain to point out the phases of the development. Mr. Spain pointed out the phases on a map for the Commission. Commissioner Potter asked Mr. Spain why he did not want to widen Manchester Court. Mr. Spain stated that it was because it met the 20 lot requirement it did not seem imperative; however, he would comply with the request. Vice - Chairman Johnson asked the Staff how the Nelson tract would develop if there was a street stub from Westminster Way to the west. Director Greg Last commented that there was not a need to "over- stub" the Nelson tract. He recommended running the stub from Westminster Way into the Nelson tract and keep the South Hollow tract and eliminate the Windsor Drive stub. Chairman Wright commented that the applicant is aiming towards developing a gated (guarded) community which will do away with the street stub. Vice - Chairman Johnson commented the development would be better off having Windsor Drive stubbed or having an alternative which will be further to the south off of Westminster Way. Motion was made to approve ZA95 -80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition subject to Preliminary Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 (specifying in item #5 that Westminster Way and Windsor Drive have 60 feet width of right -of -way and the street pavement have the width of 37 feet, allow the length of the cul -de -sac on Manchester Court as shown, and forgive the REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 18 Manchester Court discrepancy of the number of lots; and delete item #7, "A street stub is required into the common west line of the project tract and the east line of the Foster tract." Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #3458 -4668) Agenda Item #10, ZA95 -81, Plat Revision Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for the Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I, being a revision of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1328, P.R.T.C.T and 0.064 acres of Tract 1B situated in the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519 for a total of 0.833 acres. The property is located 302 and 304 Quail Court, Northwest of the intersection of Redwing Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. The current zoning is "R- P.U.D" Residential Planned Unit Development. The owners are The Estate of Audrey L Stone, deceased; the Estate of A.C. Stone, deceased; Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc.; William Byrne and Monica Waite; Applicant: Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. The property is located in SPIN Neighborhood #13. Three written notices were sent out to property owners within the 200 feet notification area, and the Staff has not received any written response. Fred Joyce (Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc.), 1017 William D. Tate Avenue, Grapevine, Texas 76051, was present to represent this item. Mr. Joyce had a concern with item #8 (The common lot line of Lots 6R and 7R does not meet the intent of the requirement of radial side lot lines) staff comment on the Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995. If the staff radial comment is accepted, it will the plat in the position it was before. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. No Commission discussion. REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 19 Motion was made to approve ZA95 -81, Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I subject Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 with item #8 deleted. Motion: Hobbs Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #4668 -4880) Chairman Wright commented that, according to the new adopted Resolution No. 95 -24, no comprehensive planning items can be addressed after 11:00 p.m. Commissioner Potter recommended for the Commission to schedule a workshop on the next item. Chairman Wright commented that the zoning case should be tabled to the next meeting and have a workshop between meetings. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy recommended to table this item until September 7, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting. Additionally, she confirmed that it was feasible to have a workshop on the next agenda item, and have it as discussion item on the workshop agenda. Agenda Item #11 Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -Q Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 -Q establishing special regulations for development adjacent to residential areas. Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No discussion from the audience. No Commission discussion. Motion was made to table Ordinance No. 480 -Q till the Planning and Zoning Meeting on September 7, 1995 and continue the public hearing. Motion: Murphy Second: Johnson Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1995 PAGE 20 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 03 -95, tape 2, section #4880 -4966) Discussion: The Commission and the Staff came to the agreement to have a workshop on Ordinance No. 480 -Q on August 23, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 03 -95, tape 2, section #4966 -5030) Agenda Item #11, Meeting Adjourned Chairman Wright adjourned the meeting at 1:17 a.m., Friday, August 18, 1995. Motion: Johnson Second: Murphy Ayes: Wright, Johnson, Arnold, Murphy, Hobbs, Potter, and Schroetke Nays: none Approved: 7 -0 (Planning and Zoning Meeting, 08- 17 -95, tape 2, section #5030 -5036) oe Wright, Chairman ATTEST: C�- G`te21e Laurie Sh 'ets Community Development Secretary G: \W PF \MTG \MIN \08- 17 -95. MIN THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ((, * I, C ' h h •-.. S ''' a‹.-----member of the Pck 6,A'.,—'-- make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and/or a person or persons related to me, have a substantia in erest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote or decision of the Q S ) ? t 2 � � as those terms are defined in Chapter 171, Texas Local Governme nt Code. The business entity is l Al' A NC AsI pj (// (name and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. . /Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever. It Signed this(? -may of U /...------- , 19 , I C / � _................_%.„„„. _ / �i. -- _ S' • nature of Official ir 01 Le ccut.criu, FA . Title / BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared and on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of knowledge or belief. Swogi to and subscribed to before me on this day of , 19 . aa 0. Notary Public in and Mi e State of Texas Type/Print Notary's Name My Commission Expires: 0.1.J. LINDA CARPENTER ( I ' * ) y STATE OF TEXAS +rF uF {w + My Comm. Exp. 03/22/97 G:\ W PF \FORMS\AFFID. FRM City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM September 7, 1995 TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS FROM: LAURIE SHEETS, SECRETARY SUBJECT: REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1995 Attached is an updated version of the minutes from the previous regular meeting. Below are the items that were changed: 1) page 1, agenda item #2, fourth paragraph, the word "dissenting" needs to be replaced with the word "abstaining ". 2) page 6, third paragraph, first sentence, the word "foggy" needs to be replaced with the word "fogging ". 3) page 14, case ZA95 -76, omit the names "Potter" and "Schroetke" from the Ayes section of the approval 4) page 15, third paragraph, first sentence, the word "on" needs to be placed between the . words "Meeting" and "September ". 5) page 19, last paragraph, change the word "to" to the word "till" and replace the words "this till" with the word "on ". cc: Greg Last, Director Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator attachment