Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1994-03-03 P&Z Meeting
City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 3, 1994 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:30 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes of the January 20, 1994 P & Z Meeting and February 17, 1994 P & Z Meeting. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider: ZA93 -117, Rezoning request for a 2.978 acre tract situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being Tracts 7, 7A and a portion of Tract 5. Current zoning: "SF -1A" Single- Family Residential District and "AG" Agricultural; Requested zoning: "SF -30" Single - Family Residential District. Location: West of Harbor Oaks Subdivision. Owners: David George and Betty Foreman. Applicant: VLMC, Inc. Continuation of Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA93 -118, Rezoning request for a 1.179 acre tract situated in the John Childress Survey, Abstract No. 254, Tract 2F2. Current zoning: "SF -1A" Single- Family Residential District; Requested zoning: "SF -20A" Single - Family Residential District. Location: approximately 200' south of the Denton /Tarrant County line, west of Burney Lane. Owner: David George. Applicant: VLMC, Inc. Continuation of Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA93 -119, Preliminary Plat of Hallwood Addition, Lots 1 -8, Block 1; Lots 1 -16, Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, being 30.868 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tracts 2C, 5, 7 and 7A; and the John Childress Survey, Abstract No. 254, Tract 2F2. Location: West of the Harbor Oaks Subdivision. Applicant: VLMC, Inc. Continuation of Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA93 -128, Final Plat of Lots 1 -8, Block 1 and Lots 1 -4, Block 2 of the Hallwood Addition being 13.785 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207. Location: West of Harbor Oaks subdivision, west of Burney Lane. Owner /Applicant: Tim Fleet, President of VLMC, Inc. 8. Consider: ZA 94 -09, Final Plat of Country Walk being 43.2217 acres situated in the S.H. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1504, Tracts 3 and 4A. Location: On the South side of Continental Blvd., West of Carroll Elementary School. Current Zoning: "SF -20A" Single Family -20A City of Southlake, Texas Residential District. Owner: Continental Joint Venture. Applicant: The Nelson Corporation. 9. Consider: ZA 94 -14, Rezoning and Development Plan request for 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres is recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I. Location: North of Emerald Estates, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of Burney Lane, and west of Lonesome Dove Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural (9.53 acres) and "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential (72.88 acres); Requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners: Mary M. Arnold, Gary Cantrell, Larry D. Parker, Sharon K. Parker, Cindy Atkinson, and Randy A. Parker. Applicant: Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Continuation of Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA 94 -15, Preliminary Plat of Lonesome Dove Estates, 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres is recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I. Location: North of Emerald Estates, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of Burney Lane, and west of Lonesome Dove Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural (9.53 acres) and "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential (72.88 acres); Requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners: Mary M. Arnold, Gary Cantrell, Larry D. Parker, Sharon K. Parker, Cindy Atkinson, and Randy A. Parker. Applicant: Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Continuation of Public Hearing. 11. Consider: ZA 94 -17, Rezoning request for 11.455 acres situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, Tracts 1A3A, 1A5, 1A7, 1E, and 1E1A. Location: North of West Continental Blvd., East of Southlake Hills, Phase 1, West of Timber Lake Addition, and South of Southlake Hills, Phase 2. Current zoning: "AG" Agricultural; Requested zoning: "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential District. Owner /Applicant: Conn - Anderson, Inc. Public Hearing. 12. Consider: ZA 94 -18, Preliminary Plat of Southlake Hills East, being 11.455 acres situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, Tracts 1A3A, 1A5, 1A7, 1E, and 1E1A. Location: North of West Continental Blvd., East of Southlake Hills, Phase 1, West of Timber Lake Addition, and South of Southlake Hills, Phase 2. Owner /Applicant: Conn - Anderson, Inc. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA 94 -19, Development Plan approval for Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and the Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 -8, being 157.34 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, Hollingsworth City of Southlake, Texas Planning and Zoning Meeting Agenda March 3, 1994 Page 3 and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and the O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location: Village E: South of East Continental Blvd. and West of Glendover, Timarron Addition. Village F: East of The Dominion Addition. Village G: North of Brenwyck, Timarron Addition. Current zoning: "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner /Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: ZA 94 -20, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and a Revised Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 - 8, being 157.34 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, Hollingsworth and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and the O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Current zoning: "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner /Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: Revisions to Drainage Ordinance No. 482. Continuation of Public Hearing. 16. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 25, 1994, at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. 11 /44:1 AL. andra L. LeGrand - City Secretary rF.- 4' x v • • w a° If you plan to attend this pubs tubing and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481 -5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING March 3, 1994 MINUTES Commission Present: Chairman, Joe Wright; Members: Nick McGarity, Randy Arnold, Michael Richarme, and Lanny Tate. Commissioner Absent: Ernest Johnson City Staff Present: Community Development Director, Greg Last; (Mr Last arrived after SPIN meeting at 9:45 p.m.) Planner, Tom Elgin; Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy; City Engineer, Ron Harper and Community Development Secretary, Glenda Jaynes. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:30 p.m. Agenda Item #2, Approval of Minutes. Motion was made to approve the Minutes of the January 20, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion: Richarme Second: McGarity Ayes: McGarity, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Abstain: Arnold Approved: 4 -0 -1 Motion was made to approve the Minutes of the February 17, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting as amended. Motion: Richarme Second: McGarity Ayes: McGarity, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Agenda Item #3, Administrative Comments. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that James Murphy has been appointed as the new P & Z Commissioner, but was unable to be here tonight due to a conflict of schedule, however, will be with us on April 7, 1994. Planner Tom Elgin informed the Commission that he and Commissioner Richarme were able to attend an APA Meeting on Corridor Studies presented by Midwest Section of the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association. Mr. Elgin commented that issues such as; State Hwy Funding, urban development, landscaping, and access management. Mr. Elgin then commented that on March 18th, Midwest Section of Texas Chaper will be holding another meeting on the subject of strategic planning and encourage interested parties to attend. Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 2 Commissioner Richarme commented that he found the meeting to be very beneficial and then encouraged the Commission to review the notes taken. Commissioner Richarme informed the Commission that tonight is his last meeting because he plans to file for Place 2 on the City Council. Mr. Richarme then expressed his appreciation to the Chairman, Commissioners and staff. Chairman Wright commented that applicant, Tim Fleet requested items #4, 5, 6 be tabled and continue the public hearing to the April 7 1994 meeting and #7, Final Plat be tabled to the April 21, 1994 meeting. Commissioner Richarme commented that since January 6, 1994 these set of items have been tabled 5 times, and he was concerned that they were getting away from the initial presentation. Motion was made to deny agenda items #4, ZA93 -117, #5, ZA93 -118, and #6, ZA93 -119 without prejudice to the applicant., Tim Fleet, President of VLMC, Inc. Motion: Richarme Motion died due to lack of second. Motion was made to table agenda items #4, ZA93 -117, #5, ZA93 -118, and #6, ZA93 -119 and to continue the Public Hearing at the request of applicant, Tim Fleet, President of VLMC, Inc. to the April 7, 1994 meeting. Motion: McGarity Second: Arnold Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Wright, and Tate Nays: Richarme Approved: 4 -1 Motion was made to table agenda item #7, ZA93 -128 at the request of applicant, Tim Fleet, President of VLMC, Inc. to the April 21, 1994 meeting. Motion: McGarity Second: Arnold Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Wright, and Tate Nays: Richarme Approved: 4 -1 Commissioner Richarme opposed due to the same comment as stated previously. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy commented that Mr. Fleet's SF -1 zoning request ZA 93 -115 has been put on hold until the April 19th City Council meeting with the understanding that those residents within 200 feet will be reminded of that date. Ms. Gandy then suggested that she also inform them of the date of these other items going before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant for Item #8, ZA 94 -09 has requested to table until the C : \NPP \NTO \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 3 April 7 meeting. Motion was made to table item #8, ZA 94 -09, Final Plat of Country Walk as requested by the applicant, The Nelson Company to the April 7, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting. Motion: McGarity Second: Arnold Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Agenda Item #9, ZA 94 -14, Rezoning and Development Plan request for 82.4 acres, Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Chairman Wright advised the audience that the this item was a Public Meeting, but not a Public Hearing; however, he would allow public to speak on issues not brought up at the last meeting. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Rezoning and Development Plan of 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres are recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I. Located North of Emerald Estates, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of Burney Lane, and west of Lonesome Dove Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural (9.53 acres) and "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential (72.88 acres) and the requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners are Mary M. Arnold, Gary Cantrell, Larry D. Parker, Sharon K. Parker, Cindy Atkinson, and Randy A. Parker and the applicant is Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Forty -eight notices were sent out. Four written responses were received in opposition within the 200' notification area as previously noted at the last meeting: Rod Zielke, 1090 Burney; Terry Mulden, 2921 Flamingo; Michael Totin, 919 Emerald Blvd and Pat Otter, 1599 Flamingo Circle. Ms. Gandy commented that she has received several more responses from residents located outside and within the 200' notification area and then summarized the responses as follows: - Mr. Gregory Swain, 2704 Taylor,(outside) called and opposed the development. He was concerned with the drainage, infrastructure to accommodate growth, overburden of schools and increased traffic. - Dennis McWillaims, 1451 Emerald (outside) opposed and was concerned with the drainage, growth, and detention pond. - Mary Blackwell, 1491 Emerald Cir. was concerned with the potential sewer problems and drainage. - Ms. Jolly, 1230 Taylor, (outside) who felt this proposal would be a threat due to the smaller homes and type of people it would bring. - Gary and Susie Griffen, opposed the density. - Pastor Quensenbury, 2380 Lonesome Dove, in favor. - Floyd McGloughlin, 2409 Emerald (outside) opposed. - Mr. Blazer, 1100 Taylor opposed the density proposed and prefers SF20A. C: \MPP \MTG \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 4 - John & Marilyn Van Son, 675 Southview Trail, in favor commented it is important to first have quality home development to attract those commercial entities. - Terry Hess, in favor and felt it would be an asset to our community. - Richard McPherson, 260 Dove, in favor, saying it would be good to have a variety of homes and families, and to have a park. - Bobby and Lisa Rawls, 165 E. Dove St., in favor, they like the neighborhood park. - Janet Murphy with the Southlake Park and Recreation Board noted the proposal for an eight acre neighborhood park within the subdivision was well received by the Park Board. - Jan Maykus, in favor. - Lucy McLeroy, in favor, would like to see less lots. Ms. Gandy commented that the developer has turned in a 3rd submittal of the revised concept plan and staff has not had sufficient time to review it. Tom Matthews d /b /a Hat Creek Development was present to represent this item. Mr. Matthew commented that the revised concept plan addressed most of the concerns stated from the last P & Z meeting. Mr. Matthews then explained the changes and modifications as follows: Reduced 3 lots on Carroll and enlarged the remaining lots on Carroll to 27,750 sq.ft. Increased setback to 45' on Carroll Increased minimum size of homes to 2000 sq.ft. Requiring Hydrology study to assess drainage problem; currently managing water on property by discharging through pipe at headwall of the creek Develop wood panel fence with brick columns along Lonesome Dove Rd. 60' R.O.W. at Carroll entrance (similar to Southview) Relocated street connection from Burney Lane to Lonesome Dove Ave. Public Meeting. Jim Blackwell, 1491 Emerald Cir. Major concern was severe drainage problem. Commented his lot is lower than his neighbor's across Lonesome Dove and the culvert stops at his backyard and the water from it has a tendency to create a lake when there are heavy rains. His second concern is potential heavy traffic on Lonesome Dove. Rod Zielke, 1090 Burney, opposed, commented the closest setback on Carroll is 75' not 45'. Pat Oteter, 1599 Flamingo Cir., submitted a signed petition and commented on concerns regarding hazardous traffic, density and lots not fitting in with the rural setting. Dennis McWilliams, 1451 Emerald, opposed and was concerned with the drainage, growth, and detention pond. C. \WPP \MTG \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 5 Jerry Harrell, in favor, would like to see park and quality homes. Marilyn Gokey, 2999 Lake Dr. not opposed, but concerned about drainage problem. Chris Pakard, Harbor Ct, opposed as he did on the Hallwood Estates development and wanted to bring attention to the impact of other surrounding developments. Colleen Farmer, felt lots should be one acre minimum. Chuck Farmer, concerned about additional taxes, bond issues and heavy traffic. Terry Hess, 1106 Quail Run, in favor, wants park and commented that the traffic situation was helped by the relocation of the High School. Virgina Huss of Dove Estates concerned with safety issues and heavy traffic. John Van Son, 675 S.View Tr., in favor, complimented Southlake for bringing in quality developments stating we need continued progress to bring in commercial. Dennis McGrath, 2403 N. Carroll Ave. concerned with drainage problem at Carroll and Dove. Would like to see SF20 zoning, a brick wall along perimeter, and no park credit for the park land. August Schilling, liked park, felt developer was making good faith effort. Bobby Rawls, 165 Dove Rd. in favor of park, smaller lots, felt there was no traffic problem, however, was concerned with the drainage problem. Richard Snider, 1401 Emerald Cir., in favor, but concerned with drainage. Commented more running water because of cement slabs, no soil to soak up water. Cindy Mast, 2415 Taylor, opposed, doesn't feel we need a park because most residents have large lots and there are open areas at school. Density and drainage is major concern and traffic congestion. John Wilson, 2930 Burney Ln. (Harbor Oaks) consider whole area including Hallwood. Said he purposely moved here to flee from larger cities and heavy traffic. Public Meeting closed. Commissioner Arnold commented she understands drainage problem and it needs to be addressed, however, was in favor of the development and felt the park would be good for younger children. C: \WPP \MTO \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 6 Commissioner Richarme commented he was concerned with the 1.95 density fitting the character of the surrounding area, however, he felt the developer in good faith has met most of the concerns of the residents. Commissioner McGarity felt the park resolved some of the drainage issues and the development could speed up the improvements of Dove Rd. He also felt issues from the last meeting were addressed. Commissioner Tate asked Community Development Director Last what responsibility does the developer have regarding the drainage. Mr. Last said the developer is responsible to meet the requirements of the drainage ordinance, however, regarding existing problems he cannot impact or increase the problem. The Commission discussed modifications to the Lonesome Dove Estate development regulations. Motion was made to approve ZA94 -14, subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and noting on #6 applicants interpretation is net perimeter R.O.W. with the following modifications to the development regulations: - pg. 1, changing the gross acreage to 82.4 - pg. 3, changing maximum density to 1.95 - pg. 3, changing number of residential lots to 160 - pg. 3, deleting the next to last paragraph in the Development Concept section. - pg. 4, adding solid masonry fence at rear of lots backing to Burney and along Lonesome Dove a wood fence with 47.5' on- center masonry column, western cedar, board on board with decorator cap and metal posts. - pg. 4, changing 7.9 acre public park to 7.976 - pg. 4, deleting portion of last paragraph starting with Immediate access... in the Development Concept section. - pg. 5, Development Regulations: 1. adding minimum lot size - on Carroll 26,500 sq.ft. 2. adding minimum lot width - on cul -de -sac lots 85 ft. with lots having 500 or greater of frontage on the curve. 3. adding minimum lot depth - 135 ft. on Burney and Lonesome Dove except when measured on the cul -de -sac. and a minimum lot depth of 169 ft. on Carroll Ave. 4. changing minimum floor area to 2000 sq.ft. 6. adding minimum front yard of 45' set back on Carroll Ave. lots. 11. changing maximum residential density to 1.95 - pg. 6, Roadways: last paragraph change Burney Road to Lonesome Dove. and that the Development Plan labeled as preliminary plat presented tonight be in conformance. Motion: Tate Second: McGarity Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Wright, and Tate Nays: Richarme Approved: 4 -1 CAWFP \HTO \rxa \MZNO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 7 Agenda Item #10, ZA 94 -15, Preliminary Plat of Lonesome Dove Estates, 82.4 acres, Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Chairman Wright advised the audience that this item was a Public Meeting. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Preliminary Plat of Lonesome Dove Estates, 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres is recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I. Located North of Emerald Estates, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of Burney Lane, and west of Lonesome Dove Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural (9.53 acres) and "SF- 20A" Single- Family Residential (72.88 acres) and the requested zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners are Mary M. Arnold, Gary Cantrell, Larry D. Parker, Sharon K. Parker, Cindy Atkinson, and Randy A. Parker and the applicant is Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development. Forty -eight notices sent out and seven written responses received in opposition. Tom Matthews d /b /a Hat Creek Development was present to represent this item. Mr. Matthew commented that he had seen the Plat Reveiw Summary dated February 25, 1994 and had no problems. Public Meeting. Richard Simpson of Dove Estates commented small lots don't sell, people here want larger lots. Dennis McWilliams wanted to keep rural setting, felt the park would benefit only those residents within the development. Public Meeting closed. After further discussion the Commission made the following motion. Motion was made to approve ZA94 -15 subject to the Plat Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 noting on #9 eliminating curvilinear street requirements for lots on Carroll Ave. and making the approval based on tonights submittal of the preliminary plat. Motion: Tate Second: McGarity Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Wright, and Tate Nays: Richarme Approved: 4 -1 Commissioner Richarme commented he had no problem with the plat, but felt it was not appropriate for this area. Agenda Item #11, ZA 94 -17, Rezoning request for 11.455 acres situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, Tracts 1A3A, 1A5, 1A7, 1E, and 1E1A, Conn - Anderson, Inc. C: \wpF \NrG \MIN \NINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 8 Chairman Wright advised the audience that this item was a Public Hearing. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Rezoning of 11.455 acres situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, Tracts 1A3A, 1A5, 1A7, 1E, and 1E1A. Located North of West Continental Blvd., East of Southlake Hills, Phase 1, West of Timber Lake Addition, and South of Southlake Hills, Phase 2. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural and the requested zoning is "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential District. Owner /Applicant is Conn - Anderson, Inc. Nineteen notices were sent out and one response was received in favor from Mr. Pat Livingston, 1007 & 1009 South Lake Hills Dr. John Levitt, Engineer was present to represent this item on behalf of Conn - Anderson, Inc. Mr. Levitt said he had seen the Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and had no problems with the exception of #5, Staff's recommendation of using an alternate plan that moved Hidden Knoll Ct to the East to align with the existing ingress /egress easement. Mr. Levitt said he had spoken with surrounding neighbors and they wanted to keep this easement private, and they agreed with the original submitted plan. Public Hearing. William Bell, 1200 W. Continental Blvd, opposed alternate plan, however was in agreement with proposed zoning and the plan submitted by developer. James Bradley, 1202 W. Continental Blvd., in support of zoning and agreed with the developer's plan but wants to keep easement a private gravel road. Kurt Miller, 1196 W. Continental Blvd., opposed alternate plan. Christie Moore, 1206 W. Continental Blvd., opposed alternate plan. Public Hearing closed. Community Development Director Last said the alternate plan was recommended for the long term benefit to have a public street for future sale or replat of this area with anticipation that private maintenance would fail long term and the citizens would request that the city maintain the road. After a discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission not to go with the alternate plan. Motion was made to approve ZA 94 -17 subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and deleting item #5. Motion: Richarme Second: McGarity Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 C: \NPF \MTG \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 9 Agenda Item #12, ZA 94 -18, Preliminary Plat of Southlake Hills East, Conn - Anderson, Inc. Chairman Wright advised the audience that this item was a Public Hearing. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Preliminary Plat of Southlake Hills East, being 11.455 acres situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, Tracts 1A3A, 1A5, 1A7, 1E, and 1E1A. Located North of West Continental Blvd., East of Southlake Hills, Phase 1, West of Timber Lake Addition, and South of Southlake Hills, Phase 2. Owner /Applicant is Conn - Anderson, Inc. Nineteen notices were sent out and one response was received in favor from Mr. Pat Livingston, 1007 & 1009 South Lake Hills Dr. John Levitt, Engineer was present to represent this item on behalf of Conn - Anderson, Inc. Mr. Levitt said he had seen the Plat Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and had no problems with the exception of #3, Staff's recommendation to provide a standard "knuckle" on Hidden Meadow Ct. and #4 to use alternate plan. Mr. Levitt then requested the Commission's approval on the knuckle as shown on the submitted preliminary plat. Public Hearing. No one responded and the Public Hearing was closed. Motion was made to approve ZA 94 -18 subject to the Plat Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 deleting item's #4 & #3 and approving knuckle as presented and shown on the preliminary plat. Motion: Richarme Second: Arnold Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Agenda Item #13, ZA 94 -19, Development Plan approval for Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and the Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 -8, Timarron Land Corporation. Chairman Wright advised the audience that this item was a Public Hearing. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Development Plan approval for Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and the Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 -8, being 157.34 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, Hollingsworth and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and the O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location of Village E is South of East Continental Blvd. and West of Glendover, Timarron Addition. Village F is East of The Dominion Addition. Village G is located North of Brenwyck, Timarron Addition. Current zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner /Applicant is Timarron C: \NPP \MTO \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 10 Land Corporation. Eight notices were sent out and no responses were received. Steve Yetts, Developer was present to represent this item. Mr. Yetts commented he had seen the Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and had no problems. The Commission discussed the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway and the revised Development Regulations for Villages E, F, and G. Public Hearing. Rick Garrett, 290 Lilac, wants Lilac to connect to Byron Nelson Pkwy and felt the lots should be larger. Bruce McCombs, 280 Lilac had no problem, but would like to see Byron Nelson to open up to Lilac. Dee Perkins, 1350 Bent Creek, was opposed to the small lots and said they should be larger. Public Hearing closed. Motion was made to approve ZA 94 -19 subject to Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 with the following modifications to the Development Regulations: - Village F, Depth of Front Yard: change 75% to 50% - Village G, Lot Size: change to Ten thousand five hundred (10,500) S.F. Minimum and Eleven thousand (11,000) S.F. average. Motion: McGarity Second: Arnold Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Agenda Item #14, ZA 94 -20, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and a Revised Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 - 8, Timarron Land Corporation. Chairman Wright advised the audience that this item was a Public Hearing. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that the applicant's request is for a Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Villages E, F, and G and a Revised Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village C, Block 12, Lots 1 - 8, being 157.34 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, Hollingsworth and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and the O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Current zoning is "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner /Applicant is Timarron Land Corporation. Eight notices were sent out and no responses were received. C: \NPP \MTG \MIN \MINO303.94 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes March 3, 1994 Page 11 Steve Yetts, Developer was present to represent this item. Mr. Yetts commented he had seen the Plat Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and had no problems. The Commission discussed radial lot lines and lot sizes. Public Hearing. No one responded and the Public Hearing was closed. Motion was made to approve ZA 94 -20 subject to Plat Review Summary dated February 25, 1994. Motion: Arnold Second: Tate Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 Agenda Item #15, Revisions to Drainage Ordinance No. 482. City Engineer Ron Harper requested to table and continue the public hearing until the next P & Z meeting. Motion was made to table Item #15, Revisions to Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and to continue the Public Hearing until the April 7th, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting. Motion: Arnold Second: Tate Ayes: McGarity, Arnold, Richarme, Wright, and Tate Nays: none Approved: 5 -0 The meeting was adjourned at 2:00 a.m. Joe Wr gh , Chairman ATTEST: Glenda Jaynes, Community Development Secretary C: \NPF \MTO \MIN \MINO303.04 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 10, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94 -14 Rezoning and Development Plan, Lonesome Dove Estates/ First Reading, Ordinance No. 480 -114 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Development Plan approval of Lonesome Dove Estates, being 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres being recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I, in Cabinet 'A', Slide No. 546, P.R.T.C.T. LOCATION: North of Emerald Estates, East of North Carroll Avenue, South of Burney Lane, and West of Lonesome Dove Avenue OWNER: Mary M. Arnold, Gary Cantrell, Larry D. Parker, Sharon K. Parker, Cindy Atkinson, and Randy A. Parker APPLICANT: Tom M. Matthews, Jr. d /b /a Hat Creek Development CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural (9.53 acres) and "SF -20A" Single - Family Residential (72.88 acres) REQUESTED ZONING: "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Forty -eight (48) RESPONSES: Written responses within 200': (see attached) One (1) in favor and twenty (20) in opposition Written responses outside 200': (see attached) Four (4) in favor and eighty -one (81) in opposition Note letter from Janet Murphy, Chair of the Park and Recreation Board thanking the developer for offering to donate neighborhood parkland in the northern part of the city. P & Z ACTION: February 17, 1994; Approved (6 -0) to table ZA 94 -14 and continue the Public Hearing to the March 3, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting. March 3, 1994; Approved (4 -1) Motion was made to approve ZA 94 -14, subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 and noting on #6 applicants interpretation is net perimeter R.O.W. with the following modifications to the development regulations: - pg. 1, changing the gross acreage to 82.4 acres - pg. 3, changing maximum density to 1.95 du /acre - pg. 3, changing number of residential lots to 160 - pg. 3, delete next to last paragraph in the "Development Concept" section. - pg. 4, adding masonry fence at rear of lots backing to Burney Lane and adding a wood fence with 47.5' on center masonry column western cedar, board -on -board with decorative cap and metal posts. City of Southlake, Texas - pg. 4, changing 7.9 -acre public park to 7.976 -acre park - pg. 4, deleting portion of last paragraph starting with "Immediate access... in the Development Concept section." - pg. 5, Development Regulations: 1. adding minimum lot size - on Carroll 26,500 sq.ft. 2. adding minimum lot width - on cul -de -sac lots, 85 ft. with 50% of frontage on the curve. 3. adding minimum lot depth - 135 ft. on Burney Lane and Lonesome Dove Ave. except when measured on the cul -de- sac; a minimum lot depth of 169 ft. on Carroll Ave. 4. changing minimum floor area to 2000 sq.ft. 6. adding minimum front yard setback of 45' for lots fronting Carroll Ave. 11. changing maximum residential density to 1.95 du /gross acres - pg. 6, Roadways: last paragraph change "Burney Road" to "Lonesome Dove Avenue." and that the Development Plan be in conformance with the Preliminary Plat presented tonight. STAFF COMMENTS: Note that 20% of the land area within 200' of the site is opposed to the rezoning request. To approved the rezoning, a super- majority vote of the City Council will be required. The applicant has met all the review comments of the second Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached third Plan Review Summary dated March 11, 1994. KPG /gj C: \WPF \MEMO \CASES \CC94- 14.pud . i ii, , -,,,,,,,„ __57.- ,::, . , -«,,-„,.„. - -,-- , • A ' I u II /) i ', ^A " (� i 1 C3. �R16� V • \ 1 :! : . : ,.. : ‘, ._ .,:. � II \ I " bA C=1 :v �+ — — 111111111111111111 IIIIlIIIuiillll \ ::.� — — : I - -- -- J. _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ �FIIZWEB.� ?__ - s I — • — J. D. JONES , ' ' ..:. .�. m =I .-/ ' ill _ WM In' - -.L I I .. 1111 1 7.-- .—, ; . %i Illt Ouu I ! J. IRIIZWELL1, 1111 1111111 %:' 1 „././.7.;-;•;•-„ %;:///, . � 'ii 'iii/ '',i' , i 111. ; ;z•• <; ✓ ',, /- - : , DAVID DOUTC4IT 1 ' SIAMIT A-0111 /0 I - DENTON 1 INVILIIRGab © 4 � T/1RRANT _ : hit iipi-; t• • Pl. / HARRIS d'.Z AV DOUTt�I r s s � `` ,,,, . I tali jite.A.I.r.r.m. \ : 1111 IMO • 11,stAo , mil ► — ! ' s s \ I 11111 E iji. am ,w- , 0CIES 4 4 IN ion et prn \ ' • •. % `t'7 �t i � Dyytrab ' � G RAPE•VINE CIT Ull WA ". . /�� /' I IIIK A ������ ■M _, , UNI P. • • • ARA7FD 1 I eT.- ; el AIM j ,I II __XL.,, . K WIiii. IC . _ 111 AIM Y f a jp MI �• 1. K 'OM t � 0 , r �. =_I SUD�V j V 0 . © o II', �,-, ..' :„... _____ w .. . � � rD N wt :� �I LEONARD ■I�'.. I EIb � » �� 1 3 — — ■ 1 �e A I� 711 a. i CORPORA .,1 111111114914. .l� 1 IA . 11111111111. m r �- J MI •..84 I IAN • © LA . � � I 4, Ck r TRACT MAP �� Ii► j � if I riE8 "' " " � - ,S 1 , � ' �R. r il W© Imo CHIVERS 1 44 -(%, 41147 01 CI — - - - a ny ,» f O� Iy . N \ ¢ OI m < HN 0< an m ,. C// ¢� U - b C) - , r m m J �< n Z W CC . Z a { CC 12 r� W o N . < �f r n O � F I ^ rm rm: 1 I �1 V \ ;E:9:-,', W r v<, amyl 1 L r- m ¢ mo J ..� Cz.l Z .. 1 'IN •\ w o u ^ V m `_ 0 i ¢mo 1 1 — LEl H — U , ,t74 F-0 .-0 r m r 1 ` 1 r Q A00 3,40s3N4-1— e , O V • n p m • o .. o /Y ¢ < d U U 7 $ . r w N C N< Q m I 1 1 W4i C cc L . r \ r • • r .- a V \ • • g O ` m\ C - T -- • . �\ - n s purr • • I w .ate .00 n I \ < x -- • ii4:1 LIIIM Rili0 hik W ge ¢ N • ti m K w i co , r w r 1� a We „ - I ,t � .. Nk .! <.z a I N m n i lics ., 1 . r m ?,, . bi. 4 ?., _ ire .: .. o z o ^ „, 114 so , NwO!!0ui N , I 1 7 1 i ., N • ^000000 a3 holkilikV '&;,. ,. VA •- .. I • N I . 7 CC. 113 c ,t , \ x V. U1 s o o n Nit* s r T : Q � u _z_. ( 8 N cc_ IllEk 91,... .,,, 6 r1141 I N i _ . .. Oltld -- l• ' vt --:` - '*''' - I k.e.: 116. ", I biltAM■ ... I V M • YY U U 4 E - t 4 Y V N E <` I - u ry 2 ”- -1 ^E - o N z € V r Y 0 I N .a .. K . m C r °1 . K N U an _ N d . bb\ '' I \ N m N 1 I, r S ii City of Southlake, Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 94 -14 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF REVIEW: 03/11/94 PROJECT NAME: Development Plan for Lonesome Dove Estates, being 82.4 acres situated in the N. E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1563, of which 31.196 acres being recorded as Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I OWNER /APPLICANT: ENGINEER /PLANNER /ARCHITECT: Hat Creek Development, Co. J. E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 5501 Greenbriar Drive 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104 Dallas, Texas 75209 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (214) 987 -3223 Phone: (817) 481 -3313 Fax: Fax: (817) 481 -3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/07/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KAREN GANDY AT (817) 481 -5581, EXT. 743. 1. Add zoning and /or land use designations to the following properties: Dove Estates, L.U.D. = Medium Density Residential Hudson Bay Estates, "SF -1A" Ricket, "AG," L.U.D. = Low Density Residential F.L. Cates, "AG," L.U.D. = Low Density Residential Cox, "AG," L.U.D. = Low Density Residential Quail Creek Estates, "SF -1A" 2. Correct the city limit lines for Southlake and Grapevine. 3. The zoning ordinance requires that a common open space be dedicated which comprises "not less than ten percent (10 %) of the total area devoted to the residential use." (Section 30.10). Previous planned unit developments have provided this based on "gross" acreage. This developer proposes netting out the perimeter R.O.W. prior to the calculation. The 7.976 -acre park does not meet the gross acreage requirement. Staff does not have a problem with the interpretation proposed (i.e. 10% of residential use area only). 4. Correct the rear dimension of Lots 4 and 10, Block 2. * The following comments pertain to the submitted Development Regulations: 5. There are several direction errors on Page 2. 6. On Page 3, modify paragraph under "Proposed Site Zoning" to conform with Ordinance No. 480 -M. There are other references as well. (Please call for clarification.) 7. On Page 3, (second paragraph under "Development Concept, ") correct the reference regarding an additional entrance, changing it from Burney Lane to Lonesome Dove Avenue. t City of Southlake, Texas 8. On the top of Page 4, correct the minimum lot size along Carroll Avenue to 26,500 square feet to agree with the Development Regulations on Page 5. 9. On the top of Page 5, delete the last sentence and add the following sentence: "Finally, any accessory use shall be permitted in accordance with Ordinance No. 480, Section 34.1 for the least restrictive single family zoning district at the time the residential P.U.D. is approved." 10. Maximum residential density (Page 5) should be based on gross acreage, not net of perimeter R.O.W. 11. Correct the spelling of Road in the first paragraph under Roadways on Page 6 and change "Final Site Plan" to "Final Plat" in the second paragraph of this section. 12. Correct zoning district labels on Page 7 to read: "...from "AG" agricultural and "SF -20A" residential to "R- P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development District ..." * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. 94 -14" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 21, 1994. All revised submittals should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 11" x 17" reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Gary Cantrell, 2319 Hall Johnson Rd. Suite B, Colleyville, 76034 Mary M. Arnold, 3404 Southill, Austin, 78703 M/M Larry Parker, Ms. Cindy Atkinson, Randy Parker, 2605 N. Carroll Ave, Southlake, 76092 • .. Y. ' 7 — —%-nt- - 1 ‘., II 1 1 Min .1 gg 1 . 1 1 i ■ 1. ■ 7 C4E4-1 A i 9 5 4 ' '2 rg1 2 • S R Rqg g 1 2 il . • S 1 6, . 3 qi I 1 plan -1 1 I i h11 MAI I 1 ANAV011 1110011111 0111/11031 I 1 1 i I 1 ili 1 e b 11 S t - -iigLII.r _.I.I•e211.10/11.rrISIM. 'W. _ .........■.■.....,... i • I 1p g 1 i. al p , .....,. § is---.,_. , .., . _ .. . a 1 t iL.._. n_. A. • A ., 1 -JO , .*N-. .... ant s • ."" .1r is t'\_,_. , v agN i g 21 11 ,,, ;... . 4 ,_______ - IIRl . . 1: ....-. - - -- -..- W - - - ...- - --.--__. , ........... .1 , .4 : btt 3 Eite " . : r•:.ft•-•, s\( g ) ...1 114ggl • .011: I i i- i lgwe 8 - " d *Al • • Ann „.,, ■ RAN; . ' I ' ) . g 1 ° MIMI ' ""' - Mall UM 1 1 2 11 I i • - '. ' Ann • • ..0 r s\ n . , 1, = 31..„ 1 NE, .1x - ,,,,, , .,, ‘ ilog i A,,,•,-;' . \ .\ 16 II mill . 1 ,•°‘ ' - 1 .? " ‘' ' 1 1 \. I i . I 70a0 OefarKIA i I a i 1 t \ ,.,, :-• A \ ■••\%., d,' ; , - \ \ • L.: 1 g / '''' '.. •• • ■ P` . a ...._.,..., , • ‘4, ,, \ l 2 „, 1111 --,'' . , •,--- \ _ I , 3041 MIE 1 g 6 - 7 ,. ' .-1 io` \ v. , V. s „,, ,,,0 - '. \-= j..e ,.' r .. - \ - . A ,,,II . , '• • • ' 2 I I Oil i t. F: ir4; i UMW .../a. .....#/$ '. 4 4,,,, t. ', • 1 . . \ • - i ,... 4 - SS • g g 2 ' i•--. ... . • ''. ■ .. . . .... 0 - . \ .. ' - ...as . 5 . - II 11.0 , fl.g i 2 t 7 iiiimp. , 4, „• % la, ..-. , A •\ ;0 ,, ,.., a '' ' • 1 r f f 1 : 4 - . 1 ,- '4‘ 4 —.). L . ... ...- . ,. :.:‘ , ,..„._.. ... • . ,i, l i N: 1 ". i g '' . 4_. - -: MI '' .-11.b..• e.-s; , , s NI ' R . . '''' : :$ $C4' ' '* ., . # 64,< 'I ....• ' - :e ' - 4 , •i' r A t ' ...... " 11 4 :e ( .0 4 N. ,\ d A . •1 \ # ,1 gV& ell i _ 1 , 24 i : • Alia • ,. 1 , . ,... , „, 151/ 1 .,.. g I - „., , 1. 4 .e . . \ 1 ,.., • i • t .. - . ' *1 " ' • a --"` \ ' Ar:f 1 1 • % E il ■ . i: 4 . . t 1 . 1 I 1 • 2 1 2 d • 4 . 2 . / f --1 :1 V, I•4 ° 1 '`irt . .:..17 " . II ,..„....."—. ,,, • ,oe . ' '-' I, 1 _ ti I , • 1• • +1 S II . ' S 1 • A "at g I iA• - . \ 41.1 ..• * AM t.rii - * ' • I ri I 1! . • g . I x i 1 11 :-1 - - • t...' •••' . 4 „ ,), ■ 1. t -1.1 • - - — - ----WHIP...VP-M.4AI- • 11--8.18.1404 — - I ... t I , II ! 2 i , _r." . ,..,•• A • • + . . r.. I i - : ' r Nignignin -... _, ' ...." mo. . 0 Atm. I A.R.00 """ I • I r _ 4 1, - )13018 • I 3 0 1 8 - I i • ) * I i " g I I i i-:::-7-1-' i MI M. JOIN 11 let q : limmommimowhimilmonimirrigtinir itt,0.11;100..minma, 12I :74.1.■=l Ja -,...j ' 7 -§-.- • 1 r --,----- - - - - - -7- - - - - Ithi - '...."-**1.' - - - - - - ‘ - - g - "' •• -k ...... ... .-/ • - i I a i 03 c! I A td i ., • gio 111 I i V )0014 II NOOIS at:iel 11 li %21V.114 11.1 Vu-IVN NM I OVII-IF LIAM IMMO "1 SAW 11111112 liVna O A- - 5 . I (lit '00 1N3WdO13A3a )1331:10 1VH � +' swag Mt 114,31. � I II HYd 3A0a 3WOS3NO1 BZ eU IIg paw oa 3T� � � 0V P B3 i+ n J aIIi 'Be1aFaoeBy V '44 r A pli■ in N ;� I q I \ \ 0 -_,... ,2. 9 n\ O i w N c: AUGUSTUS CT. Z r- _ — J Z Z >. _�%, Z N j s o �� �� . W N ; � `7` �. 1 F — U) / � s .. $1\, , W O 0 .d' .�� w g f�.,� �' oC I ` a LLI Cc a ,,,,,, :,�' v ED co Y > °\ CC I I W > W Qk`� .� <1 Q CO > c P "1 �, ; 1 0 o i u 40 O Q� • W F' Z 1111 Y O w rdj -�•�� C ' 1 s,, Q i < 000 1 rr 1 _,. 0 1 LU 1 tb . . 1 0 1 Z I O _ I-- Q nj 1 a :�� m �/ (f) O H CO • J V J Z uj N 1, : - i WW 0� < - Y CC 11.1 �► I 0 F I M • �� • iii; I .... Z I e r 1 / 1 4 ' e `o , I ) .$1 6 1 1 I -- 1 r al g � +a utn +r� } a '00 1N3Wd013A30 N33HO 1VH w r� J p 1IaVd 3A00 3WOS3NOl `°' •' °'°°'xu `°" III g s iDait . . ` siauusid Pus t Dui ' salspossy v 1 "f "W L , i OVOi 3AO0 31 Y Wl AYYORIDI IXV1W S ✓D Ai __ —__ • 1 " 1 1 1 1 ®1 I ' ;k i 1 ®' o''' � � W F t . o Of ,_ 1Vat 3Va:NN1 , M Q O F g g N O N - ' _ •_ ::1•L o i - �.. ;ice_ - . • st, . co N 11� q ' m ';',„1;Z' "_ i. ; W W • ¢ Q N — — —I — ?, o s a E 1 p. z i - - - _ -- c 1 p -- ° - - - , -o ^ ® may` al,:. ;;► . `OW : co .41 4( -- N 1 " .�„ - ° � `~ 1 1 4 N V 39 Aa0 - t�;t _r,, d+ d - - R - % o AUGUSTUS 0T , i _ _ — _ _ — HORSEMEAD ,000 0 " 0 5 �\ " < •:�. i �-E 8. wl 1 PHASE 0 – 3 - - " ' " " ® .-4„..; oI • J - s . Er Z . PHASE 1 - a ` co ____ . _ -10 '13-vi° L ,4„ \ 1 111 1 i I I 1.3 Ain s3vv _ o ` 1 1 , a - - -- J ^__ ��-_ - =.;fry - . 1 E D 1 _ 1Va1 83A11:1 a30MOd _ _ _ _ _ 1 1.3 t�Yd 1 — >._./1 1 I I I I I — - - - - -_� , 'A , 0 r 1 _ _ r .; {.' . c i t y : �.�: N 0 I fl ' i H a ' 7 a ' :Clr `" - -- 1 - --- -- - - -J -- __ � 1 — — ® i ' . , anN3AYY__13PLitiVO r 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-114 `: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A THO P `£ N BT RVE?, < AB °�°•T' 1 > > »1 :3 OF> [WHI: s :` : '''': >:. ": MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT .......................................................................................................................................... ...................IT........A FROM SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC ........................................................................ ............................ ....................................................................... ........................... REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,- residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as <:: X� G:> >:.:;; <::: A::.: elGUI: �: u at »:: >:1:::.::: < >:::;: >::> 4c x: 0 s:::. •:.;;:.;:.;:.:.;:...::.,:.... :: . Ro dant: s : : : :: : <::m'7 ; <; 88 : : :: ;:a::);<:: under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ord. r ance....... and...... �. � ....... ............�.............� :::. WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate C: \ORD \ZONING \480.114 O Page 1 neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: ............... ............... Being approximately a a: acre tract of land out of the IS E _ S;: >:S ::`; ry 2 :: : ::. t ' 1 < S' 3 and more fully .......................00 ari and . completely . described in kfiiliit " ; "' attached hereto and incorporated herein. C: \ORD \ZONING \480.114 Page 2 .::::::::::::::::: F rom : .:.. . >:<::;::;A .::: :0` ,. . ,a 00.0i:::. 9:< :3 >:: *6 ii+iiiii :::<::<:::4 3 d:: :: :: >:: : ': ; 2: : E3 :: >::; :< : 3.* : , i . '�:�:..;}i >i ?::i::::• ..': :• •: .:. ::. :. • ?. iii:jii::: ::.:::' <ij.:. ..:i::i::i::i::i :: •. :. :: : is %v:i;:::i:ji RgO$400ttalnPIatibb d::: >Urt: >:;:fde:Opiue: <::: . Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the C: \ORD \ZONING \480.114 1'4-10 Page 3 effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C: \ORD \ZONING \480.114 04-11 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" BEING a part of the N. E. THOMPSON SURVEY, Abstract No. 1563, situated in the city of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; embracing a portion of Tract No. 2, all of Tracts No. 1 and 3 described in the deed to Shannon E. Miller recorded in Volume 1569, Page 197, in the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.,TX.) and all of a called 10 acre tract described in a deed to C. A. Parker of record in Volume 1311, Page 125, D.R.T.C., TX., being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a 1" iron for the Northwest corner of said C. A. Parker tract and the Northeast corner of a tract described in a deed to the city of Southlake of record in Volume 5698, Page 304, D.R.T.C., TX., said point also being by deed calls, South 89 degrees 37 minutes East 30.0 feet and South 00 degrees 23 minutes West, 1,045.3 feet from the Northwest corner of said Thompson Survey; THENCE North 00 degrees 22 minutes 12 seconds East, along the east line of said 30 feet wide strip described in the deed to the city of Southlake recorded in Volume 5752, Page 48, D.R.T.C., TX. for the said east line of North Carroll Avenue, 1,045.36feet to a railroad spike for the Northeast corner of said City tract in the North line of said Survey and said Tract No. 2, in Burney Lane. THENCE South 89 degrees 37 minutes East, along the said North line of Survey, the said North line of Tract No. 2, in said Burney Lane, 2,122.93 feet to a railroad spike for the Northeast corner of said Survey and Tract No. 2. THENCE South 00 degrees 22 minutes 57 seconds West, along the East line of said Survey and the East line of said Tract No. 2, to and along the East line of said Tract No. 3, a distance of 1,485.54 feet to the Southeast corner of said Tract No. 3 and the Northeast corner of the 0.308 acre tract described in the deed to Lonesome Dove Cemetery Association recorded in Volume 9239, Page 762, D.R.T.C., TX.; THENCE North 89 degrees 58 minutes 33 seconds West, along the North line of said 0.308 acre tract and along a line in said Tract No. 3, 511.67 feet to a 2 -1/2" chain link fence post for the Northwest corner on said 0.308 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 29 seconds East 269.99 feet, along the West line of said 0.308 acre tract to a 1" iron for the southerly Southeast corner of said_Tract No. 3, and the Southwest corner of 0.308 acre tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 22 minutes 19 seconds West 1,615.23 feet, along the South line of said Tract No. 3 and said called 10 acre Tract and along the North line of Block 1 of Emerald Estates as recorded in Volume 388 -165, Page 48 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (P.R.T.C., TX.), to a 1/2 " iron set in same at the Southeast corner of the tract described in a deed to the city of Southlake in Volume 5698, Page 304, D.R.T.C., TX.; THENCE North 00 degrees 24 minutes 23 seconds East 706.45 feet, along the East line of the last referenced tract said line being the East R.O.W. of N. Carroll Avenue and the West line of said called 10 acre tract to the Point of Beginning and containing 82.4 acres. p C: \ORD \ZONING \480.114 0 F IJ Page 5 LONESOME DOVE ESTATES DEVELOPMENT REGULATION MARCH 1, 1994 A Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") Residential Community Southlake, Texas This proposal is made by Tom M. Matthews, Jr. and Hat Creek Development Company on behalf of the current property owners described herein requesting the property be rezoned from SF -20 and Agriculture to a Planned Unit Development to be known as Lonesome Dove Estates. The 82.4 acre project will be improved as a single family residential community with a public neighborhood park. The master plan has been designed to create a neighborhood community which affords the benefits to North Carroll Avenue area of Southlake of a neighborhood park while concurrently providing transitional zoning between the surrounding zoning and uses while also alleviating the current storm water drainage problem to the south in the Emerald Estates subdivision. This presentation to the City of Southlake will document and provide information in three areas: 1. Review of the existing site with its current ownership, uses, natural features, etc., and review of surrounding conditions such as, adjacent zoning, land uses, perimeter streets, etc.; 2. Description of the proposed development concept for the requested PUD including land use and the integration with the surrounding uses, density, development standards and requirements, mandatory home owners association, sidewalk system and park facility; 3. Detailed description and evaluation of on -site and off - site development improvements including paving, storm water drainage, water and sewer facilities and the benefits of the integration of each into the surrounding properties and general area. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Lonesome Dove Estates subdivision will be located on the south side of Burney Lane, bounded on the west by North Carroll Avenue, on the east by Lonesome Dove Avenue and the city of Grapevine, and on the south by the Emerald Estates subdivision. The property is square in shape with a small cut -out at the southeast corner of the property adjacent to the cemetery of the Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. The property is, for the most part, unimproved except for two (2) Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 1 SA -13 existing residential structures and their associated structures (garages,etc.). The general area of Lonesome Dove Estates is primarily improved with single family residential developments except that area abutting the Lonesome Dove property to the east, in the city of Grapevine, which has a wide variety of commercial uses. To the north of Lonesome Dove Estates is the neighborhood of Dove Estates with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. To the east and northeast are the subdivisions of Quail Creek Estates, a one acre lot size development and the large lot subdivision of Harbor Oaks. Bordering Lonesome Dove Estates on the south is the one acre lot size development of Emerald Estates, and the Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. Off the southwest corner of the Lonesome Dove Estates property, and across Carroll Avenue is the Carroll Middle School and the Carroll Independent School District football stadium. The property is on a ridge with a gentle slope from the center of the property primarily towards the northwest corner and to the south. The property has a sporadic covering of mesquite trees with a more dense stand of large oak trees at the southeast corner of the property. The southern section of the property and the property now developed as Emerald Estates is very flat in character. This lack of topography has caused a problem of poor surface drainage for the existing development, a problem, which will be addressed and capitalized upon with the development of Lonesome Dove Estates. The different land uses and zoning of the surrounding properties have been taken into consideration in the creation of a master plan and preliminary plat for Lonesome Dove Estates so as to cause a suitable and appropriate transition between all of the different properties while creating an attractive and marketable residential community. OWNERSHIP The respective properties are currently owned by the following parties: Ten acres at the southeast corner of Burney Lane and Carroll Avenue is owned by Lonesome Dove Joint Venture; Nine and one half acres located immediately south of the above noted property is owned by Larry Parker, Randy Parker and Cindy Atkinson; The balance of the property, approximately 60 gross acres, is owned by Mary Miller Arnold of Austin, Texas. Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 2 8A -i4 Approximately 2.5 acres of the property currently owned by Larry and Randy Parker and Cindy Atkinson will remain in their ownership but the property will be platted as part of the Lonesome Dove Estates subdivision. The two (2) lots created from this 2.5 acres of land will be in compliance with the Lonesome Dove Estates PUD Development Regulations as discussed further herein. The balance of the property, approximately 77.5 acres, will be developed in a single coordinated effort by Tom M. Matthews, Jr. and Hat Creek Development Company. PROPOSED SITE ZONING AND LAND USE The proposed zoning of Lonesome Dove Estates is a Planned Unit Development District ( "PUD ") according to Section 30 of the city of Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Number 480 -M, dated September 19, 1989, and in further compliance with subsection 30.7, item 2b, requiring submittal of a Development Concept Plan for the entire Planned Unit Development. Concurrently with this submittal we are applying for approval of the Development Site Plan for Phase One of Lonesome Dove Estates. Development Site Plans for future phases will be submitted for approval prior to the actual development of those phases. The proposed land use for Lonesome Dove Estates is for single family, detached residential units with a maximum density of 1.95 units per acre or approximately 160 residential lots. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The goal of the Lonesome Dove Estates development is to have a quality, family oriented residential community offering a peaceful environment while affording the convenience and enjoyment of a public park to its residents and neighbors. Primary access to the subdivision will be located off Carroll Avenue, directly across from and mirroring the entrance to Quail Creek Estates. This location has been made possible by combining the different property ownerships into a single development effort. The primary benefit to this location is the reduced number of ingress and egress points to and from Carroll Avenue. An additional entrance into the community will be constructed on Burney Lane in a future phase of development. Internally, the streets are curvilinear in nature with numerous cul de sacs which provides a more pleasing visual streetscape while also discouraging cars from traveling at excessive speeds. The Detailed Site Plan presented with this proposal calls for an overall configuration and lot plan to compliment the surrounding Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 3 Y4 -15 zoning and uses. Specifically, the lots backing to Lonesome Dove Road and Burney Lane are generally deeper than the standard lot depth in the community. This added depth serves as an additional buffer for those lots within the community backing to these particular streets. With these larger lots, it is the intention of the plan to not cause the perimeter of the property to be developed with smaller or less expensive houses than those houses found on the interior of the subdivision as is often the case in the ultimate build -out of other residential developments. To enhance the transition and compliment the existing improvements, the Detailed Site Plan also calls for those lots along Carroll Road to front Carroll as do those lots on the west side of Carroll Road. For the most part, the property lines of those lots within Lonesome Dove Estates fronting Carroll Road, line up with those lots across Carroll. These lots are also a minimum of 26,000 square feet (ie. The size of these lots are larger than the currently approved zoning). A six (6) foot masonry fence will be constructed on the perimeter of the property along Burney Lane. Additionally, along the perimeter of the property on Lonesome Dove Road, the project will have a six foot wood fence with brick columns 47.5 feet on- center, with board on board inserts of cedar wood pickets and metal posts and a decorative wood cap. On the south boundary of the property, adjacent to Emerald Estates, a 7.976 acre public neighborhood park has been planned whose improvement will be completed simultaneous with the first phase of development. To divert the flow of storm water into Emerald Estates from Lonesome Dove Estates which will alleviate some of the current drainage problems experienced by the residents of Emerald Estates, a water detention system will be constructed within this park. By incorporating this detention area in the park, a rigid holding area for storm water is not needed. Rather, the park will have a much wider detention area which can then be used as open, grass covered play areas except during those times immediately following prolonged and /or excessive rainfall. The park will be improved according to the guidelines set forth by the Southlake Park Plan. Access and use of the park will be open to the public. As Emerald Estates is the only residential property not separated from Lonesome Dove Estates by a public roadway, the park affords a transition into the new residential development while maintaining the current open area adjacent to those lots on the north side of Emerald Estates. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Except for the public neighborhood park, all of the property within Lonesome Dove Estates will be used for a single family Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 4 detached residential development. All lots within the community will be improved with sidewalks which will then be integrated into the park. Utility distribution facilities, temporary buildings and associated facilities for construction purposes and temporary real estate sales offices shall be permitted under the requested PUD. Special exception uses as approved by the City of Southlake Board of Adjustment as authorized under Section 44.12 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance shall also be included in the PUD. Finally, any use accessory to an approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies within the conditions for an accessory use. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The following development regulations shall be applicable within Lonesome Dove Estates: 1. Minimum Lot Size - 12,350 square feet except 26,500 square feet on Carroll Road. 2. Minimum Lot Width - Ninety -five (95) feet, except eighty -five (85) feet as measured on the curve of the building line where over fifty percent (50 %) of the lot is on the curve of a cul -de -sac. 3. Minimum Lot Depth - One hundred twenty (120) feet, except one hundred thirty -five (135) feet for those lots which back up to Burney Lane or Lonesome Dove Road except where those lots have over fifty percent (50 %) of their frontage on the curve of a cul -de -sac, in which case the minimum one hundred twenty (120) foot depth shall prevail. 4. Minimum Floor Area - Two thousand (2,000) square feet. 5. Maximum Height - 2 -1/2 stories or thirty -five (35) feet. 6. Minimum Front Yard - Twenty -five (25) feet, except forty -five (45) feet for lots fronting on Carroll Road. 7. Minimum Rear Yard - Twenty (20) feet. 8. Minimum Side Yard - Ten (10) feet. 9. Side Yard Adjacent to a Street - Twenty (20) feet. 10. Maximum Lot Coverage - Thirty -five percent (35 %). 11. Maximum Residential Density - 1.95 units per gross acre, exclusive of perimeter road right of way. Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 5 g1} - -17 Pursuant to the city of Southlake zoning ordinance for a Planned Unit Development, ten percent (10 %) of the gross area, exclusive of those areas to be dedicated to perimeter roads, will be set aside and improved as a public neighborhood park. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION A home owners association will be established and be in place from the outset of the development whereby all homeowners will be members of the association. The responsibilities of the association will be to maintain all community owned common areas and to enforce the Lonesome Dove Estates' deed restrictions in order to maintain the quality, character and values of Lonesome Dove Estates. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Roadways As previously discussed, the proposed Lonesome Dove Estates is bounded by three existing roadways. The roadways include N. Carroll Avenue, Burney Road and Lonesome Dove Toad. These streets are two -lane asphalt roadways. The City has recently upgraded N. Carroll Ave. The proposed roadway alignment for Lonesome Dove Estates as shown on the Development Concept Plan contained in Plate 1 is conceptual in nature and subject to modification based on the Final Site Plan presented to the City of Southlake. As currently planned, there are to be two ingress /egress locations into the subdivision; on North Carroll Avenue and one on Lonesome Dove Road. Drainage Lonesome Dove Estates is situated on a ridge in the Denton Creek (Lake Grapevine) drainage basin. The majority of the acreage flows to the south into Emerald Estates. A detention pond will be a integral part of the drainage improvements. As previously proposed and reviewed by the city's consulting engineers, the storm water discharge is taken to the east of Emerald Estates by a 30" RCP and discharged into Dove Creek. All streets and drainage systems will be designed in accordance with the City of Southlake subdivision criteria. Water Distribution System Lonesome Dove Estates will be served by an existing 8" water line Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 6 M-18 located in N. Carroll Ave. and Burney Road. Following discussions with city staff, it was agreed that the design of the on -site water distribution system for the entire project would include a connection to an existing 6" water line in Emerald Estates. This connection would provide an additional supply point to areas north of Lonesome Dove Estates. Sewage Collection System Sanitary sewer service will be provided by two proposed lift stations within the project. Both lift stations will pump to the existing lift station at the Carroll I.S.D. Middle School. A third pump with capacity of 150 GPM will be added to the existing Carroll I.S.D. Middle School lift station as recommended by the city's consulting engineers. All design efforts will be closely coordinated with the city of Southlake engineering staff, as well as the city's consulting engineers. SUMMARY The proposed community of Lonesome Dove Estates is designed and will be developed as family oriented single family residential community with ample consideration given to the surrounding zoning and uses so as to be a positive and homogeneous addition to this area of Southlake. I respectfully request the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council consider and approve a change in zoning from "AG" agricultural and "SF -A" and "SF -B" residential to "PUD" Planned Unit Development District pursuant to the criteria presented and discussed herein. Case No. 94 -14 Lonesome Dove Estates page 7 GARY CANTRELL J r MARY ARNOLD I � I L L.D. PARKER Sempco Inc. 3208 S. Main Proj. No. 6107E Ft. Worth, Texas SCALE 1" =300' OWNERSHIP SHEET NO. DWN: JWB EXHIBIT MAP PROPOSED 3 - - 94 LONESOME DOVE EST. . acwva) e ( 2,, Z il OPPOSITION WITHIN 200' AREA INDICATED WITH AN 11 * 11 February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. * . , ■ , * R. , .......#" 4 R.Lietkc sew ictfce AO' r A;;:lOrt /e6e7 /1. ,-.--- .2e..6......,./-- - e 0 (Itik 01/4 sz( I ccd t l- L-1CARSzCZ. V<Aita_c_g.: i Ai N;AX - • .; 1 - I 1 aNtStik Rit-geti. >.. Ze-t4-p-kia-, //AO / / A / 1,/-2---- /// A"' 0 7-9?2 . IgadelliC_V ...._.2 (49'1AX, , _____.....,<____________________,_________ _.1.v25. —1 30a-r- _________ . , 0 - q Poccbx -c1 '-------- - ------ 14 bc3u14 - • a;.:1 G Li 14.. co,-- . ■ AWH// 4/;......., N.Carro't a a 7°4. _ Nufa.._______ l c: 29,c Q. Fu.-ye we-t P at,j 10‘0/2 5 I eil-el i 513 tAe -.-- ism_ _9 7 , 7 5 , ././ .... Z'a 8 Pr - LI i f 1 February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southiake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed p an known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating resid =. lo less than 1/2 acre in size. - 30qt Fle' Cdr'C q I F z oq F L rae ' • "or , 7t . 14kr,w5 / 1 t -1x) .^ | February 21,1994 City of Southlake We the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby ' to stand petition our city government d with us in opposition to ZA 94-14, the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove E s residential l ts less than 1/2 acre in size. creating / ����/' �� ' ��� C (`' ,4k11).6Z__, ye40 PAALalla .' ( l ' 7 ' (\ / z/ itleoli-L 3 )6.11 4Qc.k__A. 16 0 14.? 1 , ., , 4..."" . a 26 4_,-7/(_ pr. _If___7‘e?./43 ,,, F 1 36 ?.4 AqA.A / 1 6 6_92, 2( ,Xj-(Axj. 32‘) 1?e n I fi Ski A- .7 ( e 0 92 - 14 (lR t2 �� d . i ti, - I ---/2 - CLL- A:41...'' ' „ez.12 ...320rn iido,....„.*Je.:7 --' it j jta.,,_,1 ,.. ' `-' 4 z/ .- - .-- . ittLik.._ ,- t t k ._____________ ._..; - )70 ._: 'RLeyet. ik, i ti 4--- ALL-) 6 ---- ,//v-0 ,,,,r, :„s„ /Q.,,,,,„..pixf ,...„,, ,„$:,,,h .2 ' __. 0 4LCS-g-.._itic--Q-kJta _3 la-lee- :1 J Z ' A.971%;/_______...___________ _._1,_....Arii.Q.:__._k:_...,4A-Zdel-ji :--' if 2 I 4 P- fr_A- ,se4,A4J,ei -2:,) f 101, . _u, .1)-1 __, ...___%. _ _ .2. _ ___________ .1. tu.___. thsiii,6 Li 1p' c 4 --- oti in ke - 3;)- ... a._ , ...... , c ,,,, 0,./\-43 3 1_ ?)(7._rc.ri.',.nsc,tio .SI41.4.0tiktz, 33 .. I Ji ___ „„-"-=-J----,_,. ..,,_....._... 3i 3 ,5 ic ( 't/S ig_____All_ -- ' 0 fr--- ---- :.._{.i_D.._?0:Y/A(51( A c-f7" 3,s _~ . �8 1� | �� �� / .___ February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, crying 7identi 1 lots less than 1/2 acre in size. * ... iipli ‘61 i L.9.A.A..40,41 e ■ ,i____ ) 7 / -„Zet&I-2:4-& X ZO 9 0 1 Z- 1 (-)<--) - rf- , -4/LC -)-1■- -f -*- 1.5, Co\5\,61. B. A r ro y • - -- E - K .7._ ______ / 6) 7) AA 4-e- ' ..:Yl_."..:i "/ I / 17 (e • 4 - „z =, .s. c c.o( .L. o / - .._ .,Y-J,c._ I _____________. ..____-g.Q..iaLi-- TA - &.CJ c./-7N 3 36q0 ,9 • Ctn , .__34C5Cte-- ! ' ' L... -- Lfa._Det a- * \ CM. , r. j6i tY • Ja a._' L-c&a(_1___7_ kr)._ - U LotRSD.LR.. .._..1 , a0 __L___D__Ao.a0.0.A._1 0/z-4? Yjc,...7„,4,/ ,-,e- 30d I X,. _____p- Q.;,..,/,,4-4_ 7 6 1 4 i , .e:,„ "bi . _:bi x_YeLhz,-/11419e2._e___ZA. „LA:A-44.41L—Ti. /e 7 GI CR , - V 76 , . ! (: • __ _ f , __ ' AN . - v -- -- fr -------- .21(.16 ilifLSL_J.C,t____ Stl k _ _* _ c/J _. _.._. a..i._ 4, a-' _ 5.7____Pz--efp(i_sazA 4 3rtr . :3,20... ..z..9_z.-2,5-.E././a_Oc,.....___.Q, re_ i _ CL\ il) ' - LL.i " 1344- -. c- ------- 1 - 421 - - -- - ---- 7 . , A- -Pt . , ! " February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. � � / OA —1 _ ��^]�� ��� �,�� �� A 0-‘ - CfLaAl , ,_ i 5' AceAf to 4 0 f^ -4863 - 4 - 3° / ,fr 44 la , „ .„..-"U.W. - Z1 v -b - - / EjagiV 6_6-1____:4/1/714tY5- 9 R i ' fq 5 i Pfi 9 ' F . 61-H LZ , L {66 - 3 to g' 60(/ (?„,.2,74.„..,Lni_ . _122d4 /9-5" ..itm'w.,9_d____Cet.__Vse_47: sz •- i q 344/14:6_ 3,966 J.L..+a. ti?.y.cg-00 5 3 it / , �~'r ^ ' °" ° �-~- ~~- .~_�~ �C� u�� ��x8�� p 36 � � ���� ��, w _- �w� , "- __- �� _'-___----_ »���'��� ` �� " ~ .._" �� ^y � �� ~�� ���^ ' ' ��~��^ ': _---' ___- _____ _ __- . �����1 Dd' t /' � _IV _ _A-k:....._ ..13_11.__Fuee...±A. la-- Lmt - 7 -R '',. :: 7 _ > - P ,,, c4 v . - 40 0, . . 1. ,,a,er _ y R t _ 7 .1.15- ,--- - . e € -10,4 — ■ d i • fr 6;71,6,4C6e.t., .1.3's .-. Vol) ) / c-r)/ , / 4---, / * 7d -jr r / a- cia rz,,,, ,,,,...t yc 70 z_5 , <VP'. .7;:z: );; 24ff- 1-; / -- i J 1 p10 I &tie- a to (Liz_ 3 --1 2 --(5 F s? <1 .t- i c k _.. . _ - , \,,,,,‘_%,).,. \*a \,,,\ Lig/ , :3' dh-75 . . • ~ February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. 7 ---e---el ./?,>:-..,_,---- "--- /,---, /- - /- --, , ,, _ e Cr' /(0 \ � 1 - °/- / ; 5 � ' ~~ �7 i 47b//7/ I '3ct_ tak 62) -i n ''' Cl ?) Of ' / / /` �� /c 6) - ii L - ^ ~ / - ‘,. W . q_g :5 __ ^ 7 /377 toffIrz._ tai‘-26-. .' ''' . _i_g_2._.._....X.4E___. ' // ' & / . ��\) y ( 7- v' __- �� '`�z� - _ _ � 0:__ �r ?� / 777._ ����' _ 14 ..-_-__-- • - � /l ' l� 8 '/ «"" . . ~ February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. �� �. ' / _� � ���-- r- /� ' ' � , '7 N . ; p,,.. - I\ \ \ J"..• ' \s 1... c -,.\ ,..,,,i.iz , L3 77 47‘44i_zr2.4i eff- .---- - , . ,,,;; .S57r..-CL‘-2-.4.A-' *_ ),3 15 .6)R--.._. _,,,,___s) -g)t--_ A r k zxr VW Y<" - ~ ' - — w �I" ' ..,A.--.. - 414 �� l� �� YC 7 7° � 7 ii• ..- at t , l \ 8, _ ___ ���� ����� , � ) ' 1, �� 1� | oV '' /' February 21,1494 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. - 7 C S S' 4k:S1/44 C k LOX _ !' 31] PeirainsulaIc____1 ) 74 • _A4Z4L-_e& 3/4 / ,Sexo T,y - / ,04/ 'clo 71 ' , " _ ..... _ .(/(1ez vog tale pri s r/ Pg Of 11.d • Dic 3ocetil/ . 42e • - • 1. • • ... . February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southlake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates "LA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. _., * , ...____..._ .....____ _ ..... ....._ 1 . 1 . , February 21,1994 City of Southlake We, the undersigned, citizens of Southiake, Texas hereby petition our city government to stand with us in opposition to the proposed plan known as Lonesome Dove Estates ZA 94-14, creating residential lots less than 1/2 acre in size. ,4 Zt M -30 City of Southlake �• uthfa March 2, 1994 .yor: Gary Fickes {t I Mr. Tom Matthews 1 . yor Pro Tem: is ry Farrier Oak Tree Financial Corporation I - 5646 Milton, Suite 421 Councilmembers: Dallas, Texas 75206 [ rry K. Emerson 1 Ralph Evans b,aphen W. Apple Sr. Jon Michael Franks P - drew L. Wambsganss Dear Mr. Matthews: y Manager: Y Curtis E. Hawk Th you P ou for the presentation you made to the Southlake Park and Recreation Board on February 7, 1994 regarding plans for park development within the y Secretary: ndra L. LeGrand proposed Lonesome Dove Estates subdivision. As you know, your proposal for an eight acre neighborhood park within the subdivision was well received by the Park Board, and we are anxious to work with you on its development. The Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan calls for a neighborhood park, as well as a joint use facility in the zone in which your proposed subdivision is located. The development of a public park in your proposed subdivision will assist us in meeting the open space requirements for the north western portion of our city. Donation of this park to the City will reduce the need for the City to purchase and improve land in that area. On behalf of the Park Board, thank you for working with us to provide recreational opportunities for the citizens of Southlake. Sincerely, (AN Janet Murphy, Chair Southlake Park and Recreation Board 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southiake, Texas 76092 (817) 481 -5581 • FAX (817) 481 -0036 "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" • t .2oo hrea iti MAR 0 3 1994 I • . Lt., 1 7_ 1 r .4a/no4 x,nc//:_.e...a)2/11,Ati diLte JCttiaJ e„); /4t,;,c Jt iy fins.0.4-4 (6 eb 07<-t , "e iiutta) _ yzezze / sk9441 -/ n Oe*L1,6Xe ,a/A/IV ,/1Q) c re 2, <Z 7 -/- 2 Ot 'ent ( 4 7 )1 4) eft mta ./L2 Olev 20 -dz)A0 LueLl %' L cti..o&cliazd itd) di% .) S;lialii:PAIL) c/itz. ai•- et, 9,)/ o 1)4- ,cf-enka/LA) (--e-Lc4 dlittbaf5 (7 citA2,0bit7 izyz4ALL a-9i) (c. C) 7 /191-6u -YQL91,9 Ci ,-42,1A-' 0 ±tk_) ULL CUrt4,yti Lt &J /_e_YLEeTk_0(7 t i) 1 41,a/z ) /&*() --eckluukd t7 ie .7b-Latc.4 ),) t jto 2fA JaA.czkt ittiLttia,C6 Ao-c/1,6 (LibLett3_ Covne .yc,5 L-td -ZdAct"&-(92-1 u f Leo-1.4) ,09 et0 (Al& jcilt Jt 1/44 xpunt . 7ruk'd & 4I LA b36.: ) 07 ,1,6za 2, 0 XxeJ z ny ‘iwy- .r?AZ"' flA ceiwy;1-4i M€11 zeiteGt- ie/' -.31) j 1/ 2)2 P Al') Jib.) . •6teLe , C ■ 11r) OteniArji d92 j2L) I YLI4 0 (1/A eZ 2,•4471,1 / ‘,6unt-toti /ftoz (LL(/-'412 Th /Lo evt ,,OLcut .„0,9-1-0(60 e jubc a ,ALu nc)24 D itzeny2z- 7Z,ZzzAV .Z‘:Za par7/1-) J6 i 72,, /. dc- Murru40 l.uzaz.L0/ }Lave) 'Law aiate-4/2 ,i6 ,e_/e/Q ( • ' -er /75 %Lre-er-- 714 f 4t - 1 / 41/L eP-'" 2 Clq COPyaCCO alat CU - .7(j(-671-41e- fh ■/& /t? 9 Z ILO/e ft a"r-d } ./Mtc-c .41-od Cluitliv ,172 juul 6€14:dt Ct7 2 Lakkat izeka_u v e,u7 .4RAL-- 422- cif) ``` 6( (1y2 6172D , /zIJ 4v.yD/6Luk2-2_0t) „It Jo' tlx- p JJP/Lz9/: /1 /-Le/ 2-4L2 "Lino a,21_,0/ Azy jity/t ,,;(7L,) ,JnjA-.% 11-(1..(4:7 ( Xt )7? ' y J2zQx,t;t1 ci3O4,4,t 6t ota: .yr.)2J , 7 4 : 1) jij?ji jj -01 ,07 2 .t.) a,020/ M/CAZ ttefwnzA ,62-c) Al,o;-6 • 404 N. Carroll Ave, � / . � � ' {3 of ��\�C� ���(7 /`Yea ` ' __ March 3, 1994 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City Of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Lonesome Dove Custom Home Development Dear Ms. Gandy: We purchased land and built a new home in Southlake ten months ago, and are very pleased with our community. We have learned that the Lonesome Dove Custom Home Development has been proposed and is being considered by the Zoning and Planning Commission. As a satisfied homeowner in Southlake, we would like to voice our support for this proposal. We understand that the proposal is for a Residential Planned Unit Development and will include an eight acre park area. As Southlake continues to grow, we feel it is important to use quality developers and builders. The principals of this proposed development, Mr. Kosse Maykus and Mr. Bob Kresler, fit that description very well. Both have their homes in Southlake and are aware of the need for proper planning and development. As Southlake grows, it will become increasingly important to balance the tax base with properly planned commercial areas, but quality home development is necessary first in order to attract those commercial entities. Therefore, we would like to add our wholehearted support to this proposal and ask that the Zoning and Planning Commission give it s consideration and approval. Sincerely, 4 .....3 CY1 ' d Tohn and Marilyn Van Son' 75 Southview Trail Southlake, Texas 76092 481-0264 M.3J • 1121201721 •r Zodiac Pools ki: A 855 Davis Blvd. Ste. A Southlake, Tx. 76092 City Of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Tx. 76092 Dear Ms. Gandy: I live in Southlake and I also own a business in Southlake. I am very aware of the new Sub - Division that Bob Kressler & Kosse Maycus will be developing on Carroll Rd. Lonesome Dove Estates will be a very elegant addition to our community. I think it is very kind of them to put in a Community Park. I Live across the road from this new develpment and would love to see it go in. I have two children and there is no place for them to go play. I think that this would be an asset to our Community. We should have more builders that live in our Community and care about it as these two do. Yours incerely, Terry R. Hess ) 4„1„u-V omsa, z x. <a rnri� �r I r R MPR D 9 X994 � he �s1OiL2 8�2'e,r�w .t �z 3 � � - { ..tv a� i61 , au mia�0 H„� na c d: � f4 cv zt,4(4, ;/2e% /r lime_ . /„e, 00, P ara, a6--e. fa -t �1.. /2ta)9 /Yl e .Z)1 Q12N, %� .o �� tea ^' • b lerl. o eh /1-e//27-Ze-cca-/--,--6-6 - dvaj Z7 ‘ 2( / ea'2c9V- ZYajaYelf 42_ L /z,f214 i1.40')'ce-c/ `6-)ez /2.914,z, 4/1ZXdt2-174-1 ZAL)12az-924 ' a. o ' y _ • O, f � c(s -6/ / y D -CMG 3u-/ J/ .,i e6q.. -- /fotu �` d a4� emu, c sir y t� � rk l � � t e < � a � ;�. in !c ;xd 5 ./e) sew e hP�d fsm�F , 04,-dre/ hO-79/ Dj � 4}wv .9re/. n om . �i,f . . kh-c, Q//oa' - e/Le - /z(27 427 • / ` (11A--e6, 6/7-6-Ze- • ' 1 /-€J OtArvi-- '# Z-c-C-7Z 4 2-t ( v te- L)ko),-L,A, „AD 9A -31 004 200 Pkfca [ f.r 2Pn nrP.�` � 3 1994 u �r Lb U March 2, 1994 To: Ms. Karen Gandy Planning & Zoning Re: N. Carroll Custom Home Development We understand that there is a proposed custom development in the works for the north section of Southlake. As new residents to the city, we are very much in favor of having such a great addition. We have small children and it would be wonderful to walk down the street for a visit to a clean and beautiful city park with the surroundings of quality built custom homes. We realize that the lots would be slightly smaller than the surrounding properties but, in exchange the City would receive a neighborhood park for all to enjoy. The growth of Southlake is inevitable and it would benefit everyone to have a jump start on good quality living while we have the opportunity. We have seen the proposed plan and our city would have the advantage of choosing beautiful custom homes in the north section rather than the abundance of track homes taking over the south section. We support this plan for development and hope that the board takes this into consideration in making your decision on this matter. Sincerely, C! / Bobby and Lisa Rawls 165 E. Dove St. #329 -5486 SA - 38 LDT Cr on r n r ...n (T } ( 1 L[ ST ! I JAN 0 71994 ! t � Z oo pr, The following form may be filled out and mailed • L . L._ ` Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94 -14 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the Allow ng reaso . „ea/4 „zi) /le i AM-ccAtd-efit faa .J --t `Wc-g49-714 a - • r1._ i ...L. o ; 0 ' et . I L . . 1 . I. I A ' . t ' /_ / / / 1 / A. -- l L2 . � _ .ice A. , l • jir., � .�. ! , i.. ' ! 0 / i _. .. , 1 f_a i_e i i , j r- SIGNATURE : /..' ' I 0 ` _1 i ADDRESS: q I 6 1 F/YKVI-et.e4 2 z~, Da/04414 o t via vi t6 lo 1050 ` 'cA4` &ryttiacE Ede-d- i ,,e,ti& at_ L4, ,,,,„ ,,,,,,p_ ,t4,41, „aged-mit/eh a44 cl u `'` )A ' "/"ItrcL"' ic) Llom ' oua vuej --Vee&t ;'? P . L/4 dIA--- 1321-v°41. 61&- I/ leAd_e_s 61 / qk M3 . 4(cA1)1''411-3-- l LU LL U'Y 1VL J'JV tIIILVV Alllll 11 111V Vl 111 11111 1lVl 13 1RUL 1 VVJ 1 • UL The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commi$si• • i�or£h carr441.1 Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. ` '• 4 _11 -;� .� = • REFERENCE NO.: ZA 54- ; A 1 am (in favor of) (opposed to) (' � = d - : a ,out f a request for the following rea8o WE NEED TO ; . . .►, I. +t I, I 1 ; 1.1 APPEAL!!! SCHOOLS, TAXES, CRIME AND Ali MUD D RE 4 MAJOR_ CONCERN FOR THIS ARFA ! ! ! WF SHOULD NOT BE SO QUICK TO SIGN ARN R THIS TOWN INTO JUST ANOTHER CITYIIIIII 4)//pt ADDRESS: 61 "1 A J l" 111 ( �E �T t - Iro T 1 i very truly yours, v 14-1 R Zic1i i Planning and Zoning Commission ldy0 &)rnc j Lot R44 OQICS City of Southlake, Texas 1,) L° 4- (x-44 20, °-o ° - th Z) �, ,I t, .t �� f c l l c. { ..re TN R GL 4^-v - c, , wN,, .„„ - 4..._e.JVli..cay / z ) �€.\ 0 j M it ,.• ! fi - u. 7 3) Cam;-cJ y (mod) T ap�ti x� . & ' x .044: A . ,a(,e .21c _ �:) CI44. 04- -1- N D � Q Dui //-' . ( 1�,, e cam` fiatccAl, 0. c.„ �,,.h . �"� � �° i 1 / a� �. �4 (..v5 per. k � 7) s ' fi j� g11 4 • s The fol?.o:•:in form may h filled l i: g _ ed out and mailed to the i' Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Ca, �, t '' T,; , • , i Southlake, Texas 76092. ''�''� 4 , - REFERENCE NO .: ZA 94-15 FEB 2 8 1994 LULL / 15 L pp I am (in favor of) (oC pposed t�o (undecided about ' • - -quest for the following reasons: Request ZA 94 -15 is inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhoods and is in direct conflict with the lot sizes of the area. Phase 1 of the request, with the exception of one lot, is across from Burney Place to the North, Quail Creek Estates to the West and to the South, Emerald Estates, which consist of 1 plus acre lots. • Y•- • -• • • •' -• - .• • •- -. - •- • . • • -•_• • hat area as well as add to the traffic flow on Carroll and Dove. I further have concerns about a density of this Size with its affect on drainage to the North and if this request is approved, the type of fence that will be used as a buffer between the properties to SIGNATURE: the North. Fence hni l t should he of material of stone or brick designed to be permanent. This would rule out a wooden or stockade fence. ADDRESS: li 24 ,, , i 6: 0 jd, . , , , : . _ P - - - ________ 4 5. 0 ' ,1:7a.-7i e. L /L 40 5'4 i The following form may he filled our and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carr i Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092. !1 !_ j, :�� 1 'n'rp i ;r �� REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94 � ;" Q :� Q - ,� c i v I am (in favor of) o osed to) (undecided about) .•).1: __. s tJ for the following reasons: Request ZA -94 -15 would squeeze too many homes into too small an area. This would harm the surrounding neighborhoods as well as increase the amount of tratt down Carroll Avenue and thereby add to the dangers for school children getting to to Johnson Elementary, Carroll Middle and Intermediate .Schools. / SIGNATURE: / A- , / '�CP■ J4 v ��Y/1/ /� ;� ADDRESS: �� jO deei/g eG! 41 ,- 3 // r i. i i - -,. • . . , , ‘:,,.,,,,. \_. ,, .... .c,„, _.i , . ... . :. U f • i _ T nii i WtTift 6 mica The following form may be filled out and mai : t ri Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 No j1 en i Southlake, Texas 76092. 16 ' 1 t L REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94 - 14 I am (in favor of) (opposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reas /) A / / ; SS s S IGNATURE : ' ; t / 4://7_,e.,,,::, .r , . , 4 , _ ADDRESS: ,, . i (? c 4-'?"1.,K.."'.3 — . r # { ' : .1 - / 7 : r'r 2 e 4 , , a , Go6 cA 7 00 `-'"I'ter""#'.e'K' • OUTS IUD 240 March 2, 1994 Mrs. Karen Gandy Re: Lonesome Dove'Estates 1 Zoning Administrator l fl F fl r City of Southlake O MAR (i67 North Carroll Avenue Q 21994 Soulhlal:e. TX 76092 Dear Mrs. Gandy: " L La `' V L , As ,i residents of Emerald Estates in Southlake, We are concerned about, the zoning issues relating to the proposed adjacent development of Lonesome Dove Estates. 1. We understand, the drainage for a high percentage of this new development is currently planned to be directed through a 30" pipe at the rate of 25 feet per second (187 gallons per second, 11,220 gallons per minute, 673,200 gallons per hour). This pipe would then terminate at a culvert adjacent to my back yard. Obviously, there is high concern for the incremental volumes that at the least, our property will become a lake during periods of high run -off. We have already experience major problems in past years. 2. There has been "talk" over the last several years about the dire need for a sewer system for Emerald Estates. The residents have petitioned the city to act on this matter to solve the high degree of surface sewage that is prevalent in the area. This is a severe health concern, and we would expect some action in this area. It is inconsistent to allow a new development to tap into the existing lift station on Carroll Avenue, while forcing the current long term taxpayer residents of Emerald Estates to suffer sub - standard sanitation conditions. 3. Although Lonesome Dove road is considered a normal residential street, it is in fact a major route for those North of Dove. There is considerable concern that the infrastructure in this area will not support the additional homes planned for Lonesome Dove Estates. We recognize that detailed plans are normally submitted after zoning and just prior to construction. However, in this case, it is better to address these issues early. We believe it is appropriate for the City of Southlake to require that pre - development detailed sewage and drainage plans be submitted by the de.veioper prior to zoning rulings. We would then request that the city engineers not only carefully analyze the plans as submitted, but also gain an in depth understanding of the abnormal drainage problems associated with this area. As you know, when it rains here, it rains with vigor! Sincerely, gi • C 1 1bY 1 A tf�� ,5 7C40? . �� -J- MR 03 '94 14 :24 STONEBRID€E CTRY CLB P.2 /4 D OT511) 200' AREA ID fpnn STONEBRIDCE MAR 0 3 1994. COUNThY CLUB ft wuui LJ Th.) IL„, „4.,„4„ G -14 q- 4, ;-6 4 y"'i OkiAL-J-t#4-• C a6 rAckftlafatu_, . (- . . . 1 cre-. i QA,, "6 C; - aar � /1 - 0 .c,,,- - U.e..^d41C5 sue - - --�..- "7 fr,2Aije-fro ( q . 2 .1 2 4z... - Aif24, 0.A a. -�1� .�- :� --rte- . Lt.) ."-, 7003 Beacon Hitt Road • McKinney. Texas 75070 • (214) 5404000 • 529 -5993 Metro • FAX (214) 540 -5501 jflf I ' NK UJ ' 'y4 14 b I UIYtt)k1 LX L C I H Y C.Lt3 P.3/4 . nov,11_, tt nom.. CX 1 °X.944-"' �r - , — " t '' d"tx -t taec`+a-4.� 1"`Q` e" Z �� 043.0_4. 3.e,ca-- sit-Acit }CAA CO 644 0 5- f—ce -J2 1" 4 "' (A- 75 t , iu ffi- • - .. _ - - • ..- • � v J I V O 0-4J1 -L. uv � -. • • � v _ u 1 • Y C A) - 43, 4 ,XP0,1 , t-u-48R-glirra.;) -42 - V 0199- 6v-r.a.e.„ . ,t,j2S2. Jte- GY6 �-- 4. - - (A.- 3 a -►��_ � ..�,�., .�� .,�•.�... - c- d�...._ , - ►►-- �...A1 1416 " Ouf 100' r a Fellow Emerald Estates and nearby neighbors Feb.27 . ' • From: Subiect:Proposed zoning P.tJ.D_,Pre.l•iminary Dennis McGrath Plat Lonesome Dove Estates 2403 N. Carroll I believe the Proposed subdivision is going to destroy the country . atmosphere that we residences on the north side of town enjoy. This subdivision is so out of character with everything around it. I beleive it is in our best interest to work together to defeat this rezoning. We need everyone within 200 feet of subdivision to call Karen Gandy, Planning Administrator, City of Southlake,481- 5581,ext.743 and tell her that you are against this rezoning. If 20 % of the homeowners are against the rezoning it will take a super maiority of the Planning and Zoning Commision to approve the request. Thusly it will be substantially easier to defeat. This rezoning request by the developers is to best maximize their profits. This is not in our best interest or the hest interest of Southlake. I believe it is in our best. interest to support the present SF 20 zoning and these are.my reasons. The proposed Lonesome Dove has R2.4 acres and 166 lots for a density' of 2.00 dwellings per acre. The present SF 20 zoning has 72.52 acres and 112 lots for a density of 1.54 dwellings Per acre. That is a difference of 54 fewer lots. The homes will cost more. This is a substantial decrease in density which translates into 100 fewer cars, 70 fewer kids going to school, 54 less houses means 2500 less • heavy trucks and pick -ups tearing up our new road. 54 fewer homes means less city property tax base but more importantly 70 fewer students means our school taxes won't go up. It takes approximately $5000 per student for education in the Carroll schools, while a $170,000 generates $2770 in school taxes leaving a deficit of $2300 per house. The present Lonesome Dove SF 20 has two phases. Phase 1 is final platted and is the northern section of Property. Phase 2 is the southern section of the property and the Parker property and has only been preliminary platted. Lots around the Parker property would have to be zoned 30,000 square foot lots and we can impress upon the city the need for better drainage solution. In the present zoning, I believe the developers don't think they are getting a big enough rate of return on their �r.2ir «.one, . This is not our concern. If they get their zoning they will develop, if not, I believe they will not develop the present zoning plan. • If they are turned down, they might try to redo the present zoning SF 20 to get more lots but we will also be able voice our opinions I believe the worst case scenario with SF 20 zoning would be about 120 lots vs. 166 lots. Our best case scenario would be the developers not liking their rate of return would go away and not develop the property. I urge everyone especially everyone within 200 feet to call Karen • Gandy to voice your opposition to this rezoning by March 1. If you have any questions call we at 488 -2277. Also, PLEASE, be at the Planning and Zoning meeting March 3, 7:30pm. • metwell z/ /qL P)t but February 17, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, First, I would like to state that I am not against the concept of Lonesome Dove Estates. However, I do have some concerns that I would like to share with you. 1. I would like to see the existing 1/2 minimum acre lot size continue to apply not only to Lonesome Dove Estates, but throughout the entire community of Southlake. 2. I would like to see the outer perimeter wall, if any, of Lonesome Dove Estates be a durable, long lasting, low maintenance brick /stone wall as in other subdivisions in the city of Southlake. This would make less of an impact on the residents already living in this area and make the addition more attractive to potential home buyers. 3. Square footage of homes in Lonesome Dove Estates to be a minimum of 2000sq /ft. would also continue with the majority of homes built in the same area. 4. Houses on Burney Ln. facing Burney, would eliminate the need for a brick /stone wall. This reducing need for expense and maintenance. This would also stay consistant with the surrounding developments. Uf 2cDET. Patrick and Diana O'Teter 1599 Flamingo Circle Southlake, Texas 76092 Qt U ,� Patrick O'Teter Diana O'Tet r !/? 4