1992-05-21 City of Southlake, Texas
M E M O R A N D U M
May 11, 1992
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: ZA 92 -16 Zoning Change Request
REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for 2.47 acres out of the Francis
Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, Tracts 1S, 1T, 1T1, and
1U
LOCATION: North side of E. Dove Road approximately 600 feet West of the
intersection of North Kimball Avenue with East Dove Road
OWNER: Unique, Incorporated; Barbara Bone, President
APPLICANT: James M. and Linda Tompkins
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural
REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -1A" Single Family -1A Residential
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential 1
BACKGROUND INFO - The tracts are adjacent to the WestJright -of -way line of
t Torian Lars9 which has been dedicate ;T me
bill t 'to, i y standards and as not been accepted y t e
NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve
RESPONSES: Two (2) written responses, both in favor:
* Mrs. Jimmie Lee Cox, 1645 Creekside Drive, "I do not
want trailer homes build there."
* Mabel Cate, 2050 E. Dove Road, "No reason to object."
Kpo-
KPG
City of Southlake, Texas
M E M O R A N D U M
May 14, 1992
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: ZA 92 -18 Final Plat, SouthRidge Lakes, Phase V
REQUESTED ACTION: Final plat approval of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase V, Sections
One and Two
Section One has 10.76 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey,
Abstract No. 522, the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract
No. 686, and the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. Sixteen
(16) lots are proposed for Section One.
Section Two is 25.177 acres out of the T.M. Hood Survey,
Abstract No. 706 and the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686. Forty -three (43) lots are proposed for
Section Two.
LOCATION: Section One is in the center of the development, North of
Phase I. Section Two is East of Section One and North of
Phase 2.
OWNER /APPLICANT: Arvida /JMB Partners, L.P. -II
CURRENT ZONING: "SF -20A" Single Family -20A Residential
NO. NOTICES SENT: None Required
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the First Plat Review Summary dated May
15, 1992.
KPG
City of Southlake, Texas
1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
CASE NO: ZA 92 -18 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 5/15/92
PROJECT NAME: Final Plat- SouthRidge Lakes, Phase 5, Sections 1 &2
OWNER /APPLICANT: ENG /SURVEYOR:
Arvida /JMB Partners,L.P. II J. E. Levitt Engineers, Inc.
15303 Dallas Parkway 726 Commerce Street
Suite 350 Suite 104
Dallas, Texas 75248 Southlake, Texas 76092
Phone: (214) 980 -5075 Phone: (817) 488 -3313
Fax: Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE
CITY ON 4/27/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE
STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817)
481 -5581, EXT. 744.
1. Provide all legal descriptions and dedications on both plats.
2. The legal description /boundary for Section One has the
following discrepancies:
- 6th call should be N -E on boundary.
- The call with 30.39' dimension is omitted in the legal.
- Chord bearing on last curve should be N -W.
- Section two has several reversed bearings on lines and both
curves.
3. The rear lot line on Lot 43 Block 4 shows to be one unbroken
line. Lot 1 and Lot 58 show different bearings on the rear lot
lines.
4. Show and label all off -site adjacent easements on both plats.
5. Corner lots are required to have the 35' building line shown on
„..—t e b streets. This affects Lotsf28, 50, 68 and 80 of Block
2 nd ots 74 and 91 o Block 1.
6. Provide the minimum finish floor elevation note on the plat.
7. Label the easement along the south line of Lot 80, Block 2.
8. Tie down the D. +U.E. in the northeast corner of Lot 80, Block 2.
9. Label the existing R.O.W on the Parkway. Show a dimension from
centerline to the R.O.W along the west line of Lot 68, Block 2.
10. Show all Block designations in Section two.
11. Show and dimension the existing R.O.W. adjacent to Southlake
Estates. The R.O.W. dedication should be 60' from the east
R.O.W. at Southlake Estates or 30' from centerline of R.O.W.,
whichever is greater.
1
1
City of Southlake, Texas
1
12. Lots 35, 41, 49, 38, 39 Block 2 do not have the required 100'
lot width at the setback line.
13. The following Lots are missing dimensions:
Block 1, Lots 76, 87, 74 and Block 2, Lot 77.
14. Easements need further tie downs in Block 2, Lots 40, 38 and 80
and Block 4, Lot 58.
15. Label the 10' U.E. along the west line of Lot 74, Block 1 and
correct the building line label.
16. Label the 10' U.E. along the east line of Lot 50, Block 2.
17. Label the detention areas in Block 2 as a drainage and utility
easement.
18. Label the easement on the east line of Lot 71, Block 2.
19. The U.E. between lots 77 and 78, Block 2 should include
drainage and be a minimum of 20' in width.
20. Change the 10' D. +U.E. between Lots 80 and 79, Block 2 to 15'
in width.
* Section two, although currently section 8.01 -F would require
125' lot widths on Lots 75 -89, Block 1, the previously approved
Preliminary Plat did not require this width.
* We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction
plans have been substantially approved. This will ensure
adequate easements and finish floor elevations. Minimum finish
floor elevations may be required on additional lots pending
review of construction plans.
* Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline
mylars prior to filing the plat.
* The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to
City Council must be received at the City by May 25 , 1992.
All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an
8.5" x 11" revised reduction.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Arvida /JMB Partners, L.P. -II
Levitt Engineers, Inc.
City of Southlake, Texas
M E M O R A N D U M
May 15, 1992
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: ZA 92 -05 and ZA 92 -06 Preliminary Plats
Attached please find a letter from Timarron Land Corporation
requesting that the above referenced plats be tabled until the
June 18, 1992 meeting.
KPG
MOBIL LAND DEV ID:2145410800 MAY 15'92 13:55 No.021 P.02
T I N I A R R O N
May 15, 1992
Via Facsimile
Ms. Karen Gandy
Zoning Administrator
City of Southlake
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Ms. Gandy:
Confirming discussions with City Staff, Timarron Land Corporation
respectfully requests that items ZA 92 -05 and ZA 92 -06 be tabled
and rescheduled for the June 18, 1992 Planning and Zoning meeting.
1
Sincerely,
Steve Y tts, PE
Project Engineer
SY /ers
cc: D. Jerke
s. E. Evans
TIMAkkON I.A \I) (.(I1tPURAI'ION
;101'A,P(.ATi 1N1 1.11FF\VAY SIIITF. 11)5 IRYIV(., 1 LXAs 75O(12
'14 7rA.- s s3 • I' %X 214 341•O8OO
City of Southlake, Texas
M E M O R A N D U M
May 11, 1992
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: EA 92 -17 Concept Plan Approval
REQUESTED ACTION: Concept plan approval for an office /warehouse on Block B, Lot
1R, North Davis Business Park, being 0.75 acres out of the
T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502
Concept plan approval is required prior to submittal of a
development site plan for a building permit.
LOCATION: 2105 Greenwood Drive
OWNER: Clarence Kidd
APPLICANT: Curtis Kidwell
CURRENT ZONING: "I -1" Light Industrial
LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial
NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response, in favor:
* Mercantile Bank of Fort Worth, "I feel that there is a
demand for this type of space in Southlake and that this
building will be a definite improvement to the area."
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the First Plan Review Summary dated
May 15, 1992.
KPG
1
City of Southlake, Texas
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
CASE NO: ZA 92 -17 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 5/16/92
PROJECT NAME: Concept Plan - Lot 1R, Block B,
North Davis Business Park
OWNER /APPLICANT: ENG /PLANNER /ARCHITECT:
Mr. Clarence Kidd Yandell & Hiller, Inc.
2113 Greenbriar Drive 512 Main Street
Suite D Suite 1500
Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Phone: 488 -2366 Phone: (817) 335 -3000
Fax: Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE. CITY
ON 4/27/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE
ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST
AT (817) 481 -5581, EXT. 744.
1. The bearing on the east line should be S -E rather "3 ".
2. Provide the following in the notes:
- Existing Zoning = I -1, Light Industrial.
- Existing Land Use = Vacant.
- L.U.D. = Industrial.
- No existing tree cover.
- Proposed Use = Office /Warehouse, 30% / 70 %.
3. Label Lot 2 to the east and Lot 4R to the south with the
following: Existing Zoning = I -1, L.U.D. = Industrial.
4. Show and label a 10' Bufferyard Level 'A' on the east and south
property lines.
5. Add a note that the dumpster will be screened on all four sides.
6. Label Greenwood Drive as a 56' R.O.W.
7. Staff does not recommend the drive approach at the center of the
street corner.
8. The 30% Office and 70% Warehouse square footage allocation
requires a total of 24 parking spaces. Please change in the
notes and provide adequate parking.
* The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to
City Council must be received at the City by May 25 , 1992.
All revised submittals should be folded 6" x 9" and include an
8.5" x 11" reduction.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Clarence Kidd
Yandell & Hiller, Inc.
City of Southlake, Texas
M E M O R A N D U M
April 15, 1992
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to Ordinance No. 480, Section 34:
"Accessory Uses"
Attached please find a copy of a letter from Brian Hugghins,
owner of the property at 1218 Woodsey. He has presented the
City with building plans to construct a "stick- built" room
addition to his manufactured home and an attached carport.
His property is zoned "MH" Manufactured Housing."
In discussions with Mr. Hugghins, two issues were raised: 1)
"stick- built" construction for an addition in the "MH"
district and 2) no provision in the "Accessory Use" section to
allow carports in the "MH" district.
I consulted the City Attorney's office regarding the permitted
construction method and was assured that there was no case law
that would prohibit "stick- built" construction in the "MH"
district. Having relayed this information to Mr. Hugghins, I
.'. the only solution to the carport issue was to
amend Section 34 of the zoning ordinance to allow carports to be
built in the "MH" district. His letter to Mayor Fickes is the
first step in accomplishing this amendment.
On April 21, 1992, the City Council discussed the carport issue
and requested that Staff investigate other ordinances in an
attempt to consider the long -range aspects of the issue and
hopefully address the major problems during the amendment
process. They further directed Staff to properly notice the
proposed ordinance amendment and solicit the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation on this matter.
In the cities that I have surveyed, carports are regulated as
accessory buildings. I plan to have a city -by -city comparison
available by the meeting.
b
KPG