1990-02-20 City of Southlake, Texas
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 1990
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall
WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M.
1. Discussion: All items on tonight's meeting agenda.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to order. Invocation.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the February 6, 1990, Regular City
Council Meeting.
3. Mayor's Report.
4. City Manager's Report.
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City
Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of items unless a Council member or citizen so
request, in which event the item will be removed from the general
order of business and considered in its normal sequence.
5. Consider: Resolution 90 -09, in support of Toyoma, Japan as a
Sister City.
6. Consider: Resolution 90 -12, authorizing the City to
participate with Maguire Thomas Partners and the
Perot Group in funding a project with Lockwood,
Andrews, and Newnam to Develop a Scaled Schematic
for the Southake portion of SH114; Authorizing and
Directing the Mayor to Enter in an Ad Valorum Tax
Deposit Agreement with Maguire Thomas Partners to
fund the City of Southlake's participation.
7. Consider: Resolution 90 -13, authorizing the Director of
Public Works to advertise for bids for metal
halide lighting fixtures for Bicentennial Park,
Baseball Field #2.
8. Consider: Resolution 90 -16, selection of a "make up day"
for the second City Council Meeting in March.
9. Consider: Resolution 90 -15, Setting public hearing on land
use assumptions relating to possible adoption of
impact fees.
City of Southlake, Texas
City Council Agenda
February 20, 1990
page two
REGULAR AGENDA
10. Public Forum.
11. Presentation: Planned Cable Company. Bill Kassul and Rob
Meyer.
12. Consider: lst public hearing in regards to annexation of
certain lots, tracts and parcels of land.
13. Consider: Ordinance No. 480 -11, 2nd reading. (ZA 89 -71)
A zoning change for a 33.626 acre tract of land out
of the Harrison Decker Survey, Abstract No. 438,
Tracts 1B1, 1B1C, and 1B1B. Current zoning is
Industrial -1 Zoning District, with a request for
Industrial -2 Zoning District.
Owner: Conoco, Inc. /CITGO Petroleum Corp.
Continuation of Public Hearing.
14. Consider: Ordinance No. 480 -13, 2nd reading. (ZA 89 -72)
Zoning change for a 37.253 acre tract of land out of
the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505,
Tracts 1C, 1D, and 1L. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for the Single Family 20.OA
Zoning District.
Owner: Dolores M. and William D. White.
Public Hearing.
15. Consider: Final plat of Arnold Estates. 5.23 acre tract of
land out of the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No.
706, tract 8H.
Owner: Mary Arnold.
16 Consider: Preliminary plat of Austin Oaks Addition. 1.33
acre tract of land out of the Thomas Easter Survey,
Abstract No. 458, Tracts 2C and 2D. This tract will
access a 39.91 acre Single Family development in the
City of Grapevine.
Owners: Javatex, Inc.
17. Consider: Ordinance No. 479, lst reading. Airport Compatible
Zoning Ordinance.
Public Hearing.
18. Consider: Ordinance No. 497, lst reading. Establishment and
Administration of a Records Management Program for
the city.
19. Consider: Ordinance No. 500, 1st reading. Signalization at
the intersection of SH114 with Wall Street and Park
Blvd.
City of Southlake, Texas
City Council Agenda
February 20, 1990
page three
20 Consider: Garbage Collection Rate Increase.
21. Presentation: Fiscal Year 1989 Audit Report.
22. Consider Developers Agreement for Chapel Downs Addition.
23. Consider: Request to build in drainage easement in Continental
Park Estates. Request by Rob Rankin.
24. Discussion: Sewer fee connections.
25. Discussion: Adding additional inspection personal.
26. Executive Session:
Pursuant to the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252 -17 V.T.A.S.,
Section 2 (e), 2(f), 2(g). Refer to Posted list of
litigations.
A. Discussion: Pending or contemplated litigations. (Refer
to posted list) .
B. Discussion: Personnel matters, including Boards and
Commissions. (Refer to posted list).
C. Discussion: Land Acquisition.
D. Return to Open Session.
27. Consider: Action necessary in regards to pending or
contemplated litigations (Refer to posted list)
28. Consider: Action necessary in regards to land acquisition.
29. Meeting Adjourned.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, February 16, 1990, at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the
Open Meetings Law, Article 6252 -17 V.T.A.S.
d ti n at i tk • .%
gandra L. LeGrand : o . . r
City Secretary =" '�� j ;'s
d
• .
n uaun
City of Southlake, Texas
EXECUTIVE SESSION
PERSONNEL
The City Council may consider the appointment, employment,
evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the
City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, Municipal Court Judge
and City Boards and Commission Members. A complete list of the
City Boards and Commissions are on file in the City Secretary's
Office.
After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session,
any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City
Council.
PENDING LITIGATION
The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation
subjects. The following subjects may be discussed:
1. Jerry W. Crowder v. City of Southlake. October, 1988.
2. Billie N. Farrar v. City of Southlake. June, 1988.
3. Ray L. Whitmore, Louis Messina and Marie J. Robinson v. City of
Southlake. 1980.
4. Russell Sivey v. City of Southlake. September, 1989.
CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION
5. Walter D. Garrett et. al. v. City of Southlake.
6. Vibra Whirl v. City of Southlake
7. Margaret Freemen Claim. January, 1990.
Litigation is, by nature, an on -going process, and questions may
arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City
Council. Upon occasion, the City Council may need information from
the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated
litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending
and contemplated litigation subjects, in executive session, any
final action, or vote taken, will be in public.
If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted
subject matter of this City Council Meeting, an executive session
will be held.
SLL 2/16/90