Loading...
Item 6A & 6Bu�"--ITY OF SOUTHLAKE ZA11-025 & ZA11-026 Owner/ Applicant: Greenway-1709/Eleven Partners and Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. Request: (1) Zoning Change and Site Plan for a one- story 20,150 square foot retail / restaurant building Kimball Crossing (2) Plat Revision for Lot 1, Block 1, Kimball Crossing Location: 2171, 2175 & 2185 E. Southlake Blvd. Future Land Use Existing Land Use: Retail Commercial Kimball Crossing Future Land Use LU_TYPE - _ = 100-Year Flood Plain - _ - Corps of Engineers Property - _ Public Park/Open Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential Town Center Medium Density Residential Regional Retail Office Commercial - Retail Commercial -�t - Mixed Use Town Center Regional Retail - Industrial 0 X0 400 800 Fee[ n T e Zoning ry Current Zoning: "SP1" Detailed Site Plan Kimball Crossing "B1" Business Service Park Zoning Districts: 0 AG MCI - ®RE MC2 f- 0 SF1A - C3 0 SH B M C4 ® SF2 M NR-PUD ' • SF30 M HC J SF20A 0 B1 SF20B 0 62 R-PUD 11 - MF1 M 12 - MF2 0 SP1 MH 0 SP2 ,,. CS M DT 0 01 M TZD 0 02 M ECZ 0 2115 425 eso F- I I IJ j ty . ■D Alp A 4 �i3 P • . -INK m a t P Xf IN b 6. M ■ �s �m ;�' � ■fie �! e � ��� � --------------- 11 9 6 12 - 1-19.9tLTALAKE BOULEVARD_-______ -- — ---------- — --- Sidewalk increased to 8 feet; set back and meanders more EWMGMRHOURE sraRE Driveway stub to Ethan Allen provided Added landscape area to help screen building's side elevations Pavement poured (offsite) to southern property boundary 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . . . . . . . . . . . s REVISED FRONT ELEVATION & POTENTIAL DINING AREAS OR ME -r 17 F-TE- ON oz The applicant did revise their building material selection after some feedback from City Council. They have replaced the gray paint color with a more earth -tone beige or tan. They have also added color to the building by providing red and blue fabric awnings. The remaining ties to the Ethan Allen building will be the gray awning fabric and the lighter beige paint. If you recall, one of the Southlake 2025 recommendations for this specific area 4.11 AUGUST 2 FRONT ELEVATION SEPTEMBER 6 FRONT ELEVATION Stone 45% 48% Stucco 55% 52% This slide shows a comparison of the front elevation 19 /_INIe1I&9MA:7M_1:»IOR%IIIEel aI y:IaIMI 13M=02-.001: 140/01Eela Stone 17% 27% Stucco 83% 73% On the rear fagade, the applicant has removed the gray color and replaced it with a more earth -tone beige. The stone end caps also wrap around to the rear fagade. Additionally, slight recesses or insets were created where you see the lighter color beige to add some building articulation. 0411 AUGUST SIDE ELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION 05 WEST ELEVATION 06 -44000FEMMI, -IMF, EAST ELEVATION 05 WEST ELEVATION 06 SEPTEMBER6 SIDE ELEVATIONS Stone 26% 60% Stone 38% 65% Stucco 74% 40% Stucco 62% 35% The biggest revision the side elevations is the end caps on the rear of the building changing from mostly stucco to all stone. Those end caps were also increased in height to create some additional articulation. As I mentioned earlier, landscaping was added as well to help soften the sides of the building. 21 This is the tree conservation plan presented at the August 2 City Council meeting. With the proposed site plan revision, the tree conservation plan is not affected. They still intend to preserve a cluster of existing trees in the north bufferyard and a large tree on the southwest corner of the property. PA FM 17091SOUTHLWEEMMARD ---------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------- " 'r ------------- 23 eouLEYiNo -_----__ 1: Ra L Y aA Efgi-! co Est 24 • 85 caliper inches of mitigation required on this lot from the previous submittal (1) 4" Cedar Elm (17) 4" Live Oaks (4) 4" Red Oaks Total: 88 Caliper Inches • 12 caliper inches of mitigation require on this lot from this site plan submittal based on previously approved TCP (2) 4" Cedar Elms (1) 4" Red Oak Total: 12 Caliper Inches 25 S-P-1 Zoning Regulations Permitted Uses • This property shall be limited to the permitted uses as found in the "C-3" General Commercial District as described in Section 22 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, excluding the following uses: 1. Taverns 2. Clubs 3. Golf driving range 4. Theater PW S-P-1 Zoning Regulations Development Regulations This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the "C-3" General Commercial District and all other applicable regulations, with the following additions and exceptions: 1. No buffer yard shall be required on the eastern boundary of Lot 1 Block 1 Kimball Crossing. The plant material normally required in a 5' Type "A" bufferyard of 330 feet shall be required in the south bufferyard; 2. 85 caliper inches of tree mitigation on Lot 1, Block 1, Kimball Crossing Addition shall be provided in addition to what would otherwise be required; 3. A berm of a minimum of two feet shall be provided between the parking and the sidewalk on FM 1709 to help screen the parking; 4. No signage or logos shall be provided on any building awning. 27 Driveway Variance Requests 1. Driveway stacking depth of +/- 53 feet; 2. Driveway spacing for right-in/right-out drives of +/- 237 feet; 3. Driveway spacing for full -access drives of +1- 490 feet; ------------- ----- -- - --------------- PO OF BEG NNING TTI 2"­CCESS r r� ----------------- -- - --- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------- -------------- --------- - --------------------------------- - ----------- - ----- - --- ------ - ------------------------- ------------ . .... ... ... 144.44 4.44 _j . ... ... .... ... I 1 172 JIM M.j P 30 ,c- 31 32 33 Citizen Input / Board Approval SPIN June 13, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission July 21, 2011; Approved (7-0), granting the requested variances to Driveway Ordinance regarding stacking and spacing; subject to the applicant's willingness to provide an access stub to the property to the west near the southern portion of the site; subject to the applicant striping said access stub with parking stalls until such time the adjoining property wishes to connect; and subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 15, 2011. City Council August 2, 2011; Approved (6-0), granting the requested Driveway Ordinance variances; [subject to City Council's requests for revisions at second reading;] subject to the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendation regarding the connection to Ethan Allen; and subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 15, 2011. IM i.iw..uw.. r.i nwnvma _ 6WMVN nMY - rm.... ....m.v. s..m vu...r. r..v.. n..v.w..re�.0 n .a.. ......v......ww�. ,....w....mm..e .x..r e..rx.w..... +w..»...v...... .nw.r.....m .w IC j''``^ _ sr.. S� H.m • i Vi =_ m�mm®m® oommm®� 35 •�•F••� F. J/. ROAD No. 1709 Point of Beginning T xo x rcx ®or9l�_E rrI Me r rcr. as m m`hN eMAM eE 6[u[xr ®"svv.'craT .gyp ue.0 r vniry exseww rry •T=ssa�-ooAn••�M 1L______•zoxu -=_P Iv�w:.c, r. iwss-ena�swaa mI�s -L------------ �.11a-=s=___--.- _ r�-/l-hwA_• __ co I , -`r-T7 p& --- r-r---r --t-_-_-�__--_- LJ I L_L I I �_ I 'T 5 �µ aaoo•o -F-- ;� al�� - I M9T74' E •� Icri,acr I a,ci�s�' dl r.ro.om s �_ rc .00 y LeTi Moms, EMAN ALLEN /M9 AUO'TfON I. I 7 ° 0`. r/ spar PF.r•r II,Wg IW I� IeI+°r^��. I✓�I ✓ xwoN� LP ICI LOT L MOW I K VALL CxOS5 J �re l �I Isg �iMw���•rE � '`� li I � I I f rIM81 $ I ,I � p — r ®�.••�-�-�n� it ; I e `--- — — — - �-F}��I --- _ dl ` 'T a 'ffi �I w Pay x awar x r °I ma s> -- I oar£P.�a« � m•. LLL mow• ��-» III �r------------ I I I -- 4I—pT"e eE.wEaE.rw a°� P. �.wr oa,�,. E.�w .>rr w :�",.'A �/�✓, __ w B �www L4________ 'I �J — I - 3 e9.3T'39' w S/Be x „—.a>.,,— —�_ — — s3, w,. ,Er �. N,ELNwa.aro9,t, E,�x LP �w •.r ~' I I , `O U�'--ITY OF SOUTHLAKE 37 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- __- iOBIS_O_UTH- B ULEVARU d 6- __ __ _-_- - 0 0 0 �t- d �k 91.3 OUMPSIEN ELEVFTION N MATERIFLCOVENAGE O] Po68�iMuu &IILGNGELEVMpNS `r a ���L� 4 c 1��� �21 f� ► V S�9 - '-a � ■ Iv�i EANI m pelss� a. —• o �smmmmm® ¢mC3 ¢mmmmm� emmmmm� ¢mmmmm��+�� aommmmo ®mmmmms _i e©om®© _� m I ¢mmmmm ¢mmmmm ® @mommm ¢mmmmm i ®ommm® ®mmmmm El