2011-04-25 Meeting Report (930 East Dove Road)SPIN MEETING REPORT
PROJECT:
930 E. Dove Road (Residential Subdivision Project)
SPIN DISTRICTS:
SPIN #2
MEETING DATE:
April 25, 2011
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A& 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
One(1)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
David Alexander (SPIN #2)
APPLICANT PRESENTING:
Carolyn Apodaca with Delta 8 Properties, LLC & Chuck Hallett
with Bethel Methodist Church
STAFF PRESENT:
Daniel Cortez, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT:
Daniel Cortez –(817) 748-8070 dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Situation
930 E. Dove Road is located west of N. Carroll Avenue and on the north side of Dove Road adjacent
to the existing Carroll Middle School.
Plan Details
The Option 1 concept consisted of potentially 24 residential villa type lots on approximately 10.2
acreswith some openspace towards the middle of the tract. Option 2 consisted of 3 large residential
estate lots and a road
COMMENTS
The 24 residential lot option will be similar in nature to the villas off of John McCain in
Colleyville.
Density may be an issue north of Dove Road.
The second option provides 3 residential estate lots but the difficulty we’ve encountered is
having interested people. Wehave also considered doing a 13 lot subdivision and isstilla
possibility.
Some curvature in the road with a greenbelt should be considered if the option taken is the 3
lot subdivision.
The road alignment and location on either east or west of the subdivision will be a difficult
problem to resolve.
Landscaping will be necessaryto buffer the residents to thewest.
GENERAL CONCERNS
Density
Open Space
Road Alignment
Lot Size
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report
is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff,
and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made.Responses as
summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant.Interested parties are strongly
encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.